The real date of Christmas!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024

Комментарии • 9

  • @josephjude1290
    @josephjude1290 9 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks for the interesting information

  • @30thMay
    @30thMay 9 месяцев назад +1

    Amazingly, this is the best RUclips *logical explanation* for why the catholic church's date of *25th December is pretty accurate for the date Christ Jesus was born!*
    Although the actual date was 29th December! We can rest assured that Christ Jesus' date of birth was *definitely* very close to the already established *25th December!*
    Therefore, confidently Celebrate/Commemorate, *reverentially,* the Birth of The SON of GOD THE FATHER!

  • @joanna400
    @joanna400 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you, I don't see enough people explaining this - which is very clear in Holy Scriptures. Many people are decived on this, not understanding there's logical reason for the Church celebrating when we do.

  • @cozycastle
    @cozycastle 2 месяца назад

    December 25 is nimrods son’s birthday. So I stick with January 7th because there is no pagan Holliday on that day.

  • @restoredtotruth
    @restoredtotruth 9 месяцев назад +1

    The lambs are given birth to in the spring time, so also The Lamb of God has to be born during the time that the other lambs are born.
    Christmas is an invention brought about by pagan Rome to celebrate their son god. When the days of darkness begin to return to the sun returning to its strength.
    _"... when Christianity was brought into Romanism and _*_mixed_*_ at Nicaea, then they had the sun god, Jupiter, the sun god of Rome, his birthday was on the--between the--about the twenty-fifth day of December. Because the Roman circus started on the twenty-first and lasted till the twenty-fifth, which was _*_in celebration_*_ of the _*_sun god's_*_ birthday. So _*_blending_*_ Romanism paganism to--to Christianity, they said, "Let's make it the _*_Son of God's birthday,_*_ and then we can _*_all agree_*_ upon it. ..."_

    • @alxdava2004
      @alxdava2004 9 месяцев назад +3

      What a stupid analogy.

    • @stevepa999
      @stevepa999 9 месяцев назад +1

      What he didn't mention is that the census mentioned in Luke at the time of Christ's birth was still publicly available and could be looked up. Which the early Christians did. The reason why Western apologists do not reference them is that they are unaware of them because they are in the Eastern church.

    • @paulkendrick8244
      @paulkendrick8244 8 месяцев назад

      What utter nonsense. Protestant heretical drivel!!

    • @cozycastle
      @cozycastle 2 месяца назад

      I agree with this