CAPTAIN_NOOB BG I know... I already researched that superb example of attack carrier on mobile, but i want the Essex also on pc, where the graphic is a little better
It would be cool if your friend playing World of Warplanes could join your carrier as a pilot and lead a squadron, and he could land at your CV for repairs and to replenish his lost planes and get some more ammo for him and his squadron.
Cool idea and you might need to factor in that US aircraft carrier planes like the multipurpose tier 5-7 F4U are more durable than their Japanese counterparts
Klock Bence better could be by adding a new game, World of War (Having Tank modes/Ship modes/Plane modes also A Hybrid mode where you control 2 or more things (Most likely Ships and Planes and Tanks and planes)
dang I miss this system. it was so cool to watch all the squadrons on the map do their separate tasks(spectating them was fun too), and I loved how each country's carriers had their perks, the IJN having more squadrons and less lanes, and the US ones having the reverse of that. I never made it past Bogue, but I had an absolute blast with her.
Carriers used to be one of the most deadly class of warships. Release 0.8.0 with the "CV Rework" made them floating junk piles. Basically almost no help for the team. And we lost all odd tier Carriers as well. The dev team is of fools.
+the fuhrer epicness I cant agree with that 100%. Shinano didn't carry many aircraft, 47 limit. If all of them were shot down, it has no offensive capability's and could only rely on its amour from Yamato. I can see where your going but as an tier X aircraft carrier, Shinano is not the best. Edit: Ok I might have said it wrong. The Shinano could carry around 167 aircraft but only 47 of them could be kept on the flight deck, the rest were in storage. Unlike other aircraft carriers who could launch more squadrons of planes of up to 80 or 90 aircraft.
Shinano would be horrible as a tier 10. it may have been based on a Yamato hull, but that meant that it had a tiny hanger capacity of 47 aircraft. I've researched the hanger capacity, and nothing I dug up said anything about a capacity of 167. It may have been a concept or something, but since there was only one hanger deck that could fit on the ship (due to the already completed battleship hull they had to work with, everything I've found firmly says 47 was the capacity. you look at the Midway at tier 10, it can hold 136 aircraft, and the Hakuryu has 100. If Shinano would be implemented in game, it'd have to be a premium. Going on capacity alone, the Shinano would only work as a tier 6 or 7, so if they want it to work at higher tiers, they'd have to go fantasy hanger on us.
TeK RaVeN Developers said in Q&A that there will not be submarines because they would be too overpowered. Think about somebody going underwater shooting torpedoes at everybody when cruisers and battleships cannot shoot it and it would be hard to spot one anyways for destroyer to kill.
UnderShotButton Also, a sub can usually do about 17 knots above the water, and 5-9 knots underwater. (unless you're in a type XXI which did 17 underwater) can you imagine how boring that would be?
UnderShotButton Actually submarines in Battlestations Midway where quite balanced for example they had to surface every few min to replenish the air which made them very vulnerable also destroyers would tear them apart with depth charges. I think WG is making a mistake here.
Moon Gazer No way. The game is way too quick and fast paced for Subs. As I said, their speed means you would not contact the enemy until that battle was almost half over. And in reality, subs did not need to come up for air every few minutes but every few hours. Submarines are ok in battlestations midway because of a much more tactical and slow game. In WOWS, subs are neither fun for the user now the victim
Mancboy2000 I believe they are planning on adding another tech tree with carriers to each nation. For the Japanese this is where ships like the Akagi, Shinano and Chotise will be. Basicly all ships converted in to carriers. No idea about the Yorktown class. Enterprise might be a seperate premium version of the yorktown later. Though they have stated that they will add more nations first before they stat to add more line to the IJN and USN.
if you were playing World or warplanes u would know high tier (late) japanese planes actually had their propellers on their back, pushing air and not going against air. anyways the problem with japanese aircraft is their fuel tanks. The US aircrafts had fuel tanks of rubber and as fuel was getting less the fuel tank was getting smaller, therefore harder to hit. But Japanese planes had fuel tanks made of metal, and as fuel was getting used , fuel vapor would appear and if the fuel tank got hit the whole plane just blew up.
You should make it so we can make custom squadron layouts. Like if you have 3 squadrons. Instead of having a set load out like 2 torps and 1 fighter, you could make your own
TTT135 You are very wrong. Yes, they were of similar design, but it is wrong to say they are of the same class. Saying they are Soryu or Hiryu class implies that there are few differences between the two. Soryu differed MASSIVELY from Hiryu. The best way to tell the two apart? Soryu's bridge island was on the starboard side, whilst Hiryu's was on the port side. The ship in game has the bridge on the port side, therefore it is Hiryu.
BMWM3GTRLOVER Ah I see now, but if they are so different can you tell me some other different things ? Where the bridge is placed isn't such a big difference.
Well it is not the same carrier as CV-2 First off it was an Essex class very similar to the carrier near me in california called Hornet Second off it’s name came from CV-2s name after it was sunk like Hornet cv-8 when CV-12 was being built it would originally have been named keasarge but after Hornet was sunk it was named after the Hornet And last of all Lexington cv-2 was sunk in 1942 and a month before midway
Why are the planes in my game maneuvering different. it only shows one plane and not the whole squadron... And instead of moving like planes, they just jerkingly move around. Is it a certain setting or game mode? Pls help
Rees Mayhew That is because you don't have the "Animate small objects" option checked in the graphics menu. Check the box next to it and wala, you can now see your planes in all their glory :D
lexington was supposed to be a battlecruiser that smoke stack was the smoke stack in the proposed project the lexington was a the first aircraft carrier of the us in 1941
Guys, please tell me how to use a torpedo bomber and a bomber with manual attack in the newest 0.6.7 version. And why i cant make a manual torpedo attack. WHY ?
Somebody know the name of those 2 engine planes at 1:00 ? I think they weren't carrier born planes and they are not i the game anymore. But still, I'm looking for the name of that type of plane for like 1 year now, so if somebody still watching this vid and know the name of those planes plz answer me :D thx ^^
I'm loving this game, I always find my self raging at WoT but this is really fun to play.
TGGamesmaster shame it ain't on Xbox tho
Jack sparrow its on mobile now
FalconAviator88 wut
FalconAviator88 no it isn't unless ur talking about naval creed
It is on mobile, I'm playing it
sometimes I come and watch this video to remind my self of carriers before the got scuffed
wish we could turn back time, to the good old days~
bring back the aircraft carriers that are gone
Since when they are remove some Air craft carrier?
@@anzennaufal437 they changed the game play from rts to third person control
Ân Vũ Trọng any clue from WG of taiho and essex comeback?
Essex was here she was with the mobile gamers not the pc
CAPTAIN_NOOB BG I know... I already researched that superb example of attack carrier on mobile, but i want the Essex also on pc, where the graphic is a little better
It would be cool if your friend playing World of Warplanes could join your carrier as a pilot and lead a squadron, and he could land at your CV for repairs and to replenish his lost planes and get some more ammo for him and his squadron.
What? :D
Klock Bence the game is dead, that is
Pretty much what they mean
Cool idea and you might need to factor in that US aircraft carrier planes like the multipurpose tier 5-7 F4U are more durable than their Japanese counterparts
Klock Bence better could be by adding a new game, World of War (Having Tank modes/Ship modes/Plane modes also A Hybrid mode where you control 2 or more things (Most likely Ships and Planes and Tanks and planes)
dont worry, war thunder will do it soon
dang I miss this system. it was so cool to watch all the squadrons on the map do their separate tasks(spectating them was fun too), and I loved how each country's carriers had their perks, the IJN having more squadrons and less lanes, and the US ones having the reverse of that. I never made it past Bogue, but I had an absolute blast with her.
I miss the RTS style ;(
go play blitz
@@Ez-jd6ky :D
@@Ez-jd6ky yeah, I'm t6 on it and don't get why PC cv players don't play it to experience rts
wargaming: naval academy
me, an intellectual: Highschool fleet
Lol weeb
Wargaming pls bring back the old carriers, we miss them :(
Carriers used to be one of the most deadly class of warships. Release 0.8.0 with the "CV Rework" made them floating junk piles. Basically almost no help for the team. And we lost all odd tier Carriers as well. The dev team is of fools.
i hope they dont do the same at blitz lol
@@Ez-jd6ky they didn’t for America, Britain, or Japan.
they should replace hakuryu with shinano because shinano was a yamato class battleship converted into aircraft carrier and was actually built.
+the fuhrer epicness I cant agree with that 100%. Shinano didn't carry many aircraft, 47 limit. If all of them were shot down, it has no offensive capability's and could only rely on its amour from Yamato. I can see where your going but as an tier X aircraft carrier, Shinano is not the best.
Edit: Ok I might have said it wrong. The Shinano could carry around 167 aircraft but only 47 of them could be kept on the flight deck, the rest were in storage. Unlike other aircraft carriers who could launch more squadrons of planes of up to 80 or 90 aircraft.
According to Wikipedia, it could carry up to 167. I reckon they may add it at a tier X premium.
random guy they should add another branch like what they did with dd
They'd probably get a bit short on them, but... yeah...
Shinano would be horrible as a tier 10. it may have been based on a Yamato hull, but that meant that it had a tiny hanger capacity of 47 aircraft. I've researched the hanger capacity, and nothing I dug up said anything about a capacity of 167. It may have been a concept or something, but since there was only one hanger deck that could fit on the ship (due to the already completed battleship hull they had to work with, everything I've found firmly says 47 was the capacity. you look at the Midway at tier 10, it can hold 136 aircraft, and the Hakuryu has 100. If Shinano would be implemented in game, it'd have to be a premium. Going on capacity alone, the Shinano would only work as a tier 6 or 7, so if they want it to work at higher tiers, they'd have to go fantasy hanger on us.
Does anyone else think that Shinano should have been the Tier X japanese carrier
Bring back RTS CVs
The only thing missing from this game is submarine.
TeK RaVeN Developers said in Q&A that there will not be submarines because they would be too overpowered. Think about somebody going underwater shooting torpedoes at everybody when cruisers and battleships cannot shoot it and it would be hard to spot one anyways for destroyer to kill.
UnderShotButton Also, a sub can usually do about 17 knots above the water, and 5-9 knots underwater. (unless you're in a type XXI which did 17 underwater) can you imagine how boring that would be?
UnderShotButton Actually submarines in Battlestations Midway where quite balanced for example they had to surface every few min to replenish the air which made them very vulnerable also destroyers would tear them apart with depth charges.
I think WG is making a mistake here.
Yeah we need U boats!
Moon Gazer
No way. The game is way too quick and fast paced for Subs. As I said, their speed means you would not contact the enemy until that battle was almost half over. And in reality, subs did not need to come up for air every few minutes but every few hours. Submarines are ok in battlestations midway because of a much more tactical and slow game. In WOWS, subs are neither fun for the user now the victim
Hope that one day they will add the British destoryers that the British actually did build as well as Aircraft carries like Ark Royal or Courageous
They did now
3 yrs later and there broken, good job... off to blitz!
Yay another one who left
bring back the aircraft carriers
I miss this Carrier Gameplay.
I just love those videos, because they are telling much about the ships :D
No Akagi, no Enterprise and no Shinano. What the hell WG?
ApexPredator_ I think that Akagi and Shinano will be added in another Japanese carrier tech tree, and for yorktown class I don't know
ApexPredator_ Expect them to be either premiums or appear it separate branches.
This only the first wave of carriers released.
Mancboy2000 I believe they are planning on adding another tech tree with carriers to each nation. For the Japanese this is where ships like the Akagi, Shinano and Chotise will be. Basicly all ships converted in to carriers. No idea about the Yorktown class. Enterprise might be a seperate premium version of the yorktown later. Though they have stated that they will add more nations first before they stat to add more line to the IJN and USN.
I think enterprise will never be added, probably because it is too modern
hes talking about USS Enterprise (CV-6)
Lets be honest here we all miss Zuiho, Hiryu and Taiho
1:28 plane flying backwards? ;)
mrspidey80 The prop is mounted on the back.
+mrspidey80 Benjamin is correct ! The plane is a Shinden by the way !
if you were playing World or warplanes u would know high tier (late) japanese planes actually had their propellers on their back, pushing air and not going against air. anyways the problem with japanese aircraft is their fuel tanks. The US aircrafts had fuel tanks of rubber and as fuel was getting less the fuel tank was getting smaller, therefore harder to hit. But Japanese planes had fuel tanks made of metal, and as fuel was getting used , fuel vapor would appear and if the fuel tank got hit the whole plane just blew up.
Its a special warplane that their propellers on their back, many japanese planes are that designed.
It is a special Japanese fighter plane design with a rear mounted propellor and angled wings for higher speed
Bruh it would be cool to have rts style and 3rd person style merged like you can launch several squadrons and control one
You should make it so we can make custom squadron layouts. Like if you have 3 squadrons. Instead of having a set load out like 2 torps and 1 fighter, you could make your own
good keep it this way with out the rework. and why was the jw1 shiden removed?
remember when carriers were good?
rest in peace, all the carriers that got deleted
I wish you guys would put it on the PS4 because I don't have a computer to play it.
It is on iOS :)
Random _ Item We will in 2019 😁
update 0.8.0 Aircraft Carriers deleted this game!
I love the narrator’s accent lol
Same lol
me three
is new update on world of warships coming in which we can experience the ships of all countries 😀😀
Has anyone ever been hit by a falling aircraft? I'd figure I'd mention this because of the topic of carriers.
The Alienware Gamer yep I got hit once in my cruiser. It caused a Detonation :(
Hyunjun Park, Ahahah I get it
The Alienware Gamer i once got a kill cause of that
WHOA KAMIKAZES IN COMING
Tenno heka BANZAI intensifies...
i love the names of the japanese aircraftcarriers xD so good
Add these carriers to world of warships legends please THE GAME NEEDS THEM
So which is better?
Bring back RTS CVs they are way cooler and more fun to play than current CVs.
Soryu?! Hiryu is in the game, not Soryu. And they were both VERY different.
BMWM3GTRLOVER Different ? Nope they weren't, Hiryu is same class as the soryu and thus same ship, no difference other than name.
TTT135 You are very wrong. Yes, they were of similar design, but it is wrong to say they are of the same class.
Saying they are Soryu or Hiryu class implies that there are few differences between the two.
Soryu differed MASSIVELY from Hiryu. The best way to tell the two apart? Soryu's bridge island was on the starboard side, whilst Hiryu's was on the port side. The ship in game has the bridge on the port side, therefore it is Hiryu.
BMWM3GTRLOVER Ah I see now, but if they are so different can you tell me some other different things ? Where the bridge is placed isn't such a big difference.
TTT135 Hiryu's bow has a slightly higher rake to it, Hiryu's bridge was amidships, whereas Soryu's was much closer to the bow... I could go on
BMWM3GTRLOVER Okay then, I agree, you're right they were different, my bad .
We need old CV
I've been to the midway museum
Anna Wiegand gg
Good job WG, you made that game MUCH MUCH better then WoT :)
not anymore it the worst game ever im playing war thunder
Bring back the rts gameplay please
Akagi ?
It be so cool to have attack submarines, but also ships need have depth charges to counter the subs
They on their way
They are already here
In blitz why does the Bouge not have fighters along with langley
in blitz fighters are from tier 6 so it's easier for new players to get used to the carrier gameplay
how do i get to view the full squadron?
I can't find the Bogue and Independence at all. Are they has been removed? And how to control aircraft using the map?
does anyone know the soundtrack used at 4:50?
how long we'll add Essex and Taiho will returned in WoWS because of new gameplay mechanics?
WG please compare this video with the new one...
Maybe you recognize something...
Well the Dmg from the Torpido Bomber are the same on all levels...
Actually when i zoom in on my carrier i only see one plane why?and it seems so basic i cant see dogfighting why?
Go to the settings and tick "animate small objects"
the USS Lexington is in my city at the harbor
Electric Ice Corpus Christi, baby! My dad learned to land a jet on that old girl!
Well it is not the same carrier as CV-2
First off it was an Essex class very similar to the carrier near me in california called Hornet
Second off it’s name came from CV-2s name after it was sunk like Hornet cv-8 when CV-12 was being built it would originally have been named keasarge but after Hornet was sunk it was named after the Hornet
And last of all Lexington cv-2 was sunk in 1942 and a month before midway
@@DividedByZeero USS Lexington CV 16
Nice video guys just got my first CV,
how's the grind going for the past 3 year's?
Who the best aircraft ?
y is there no british aricraft carriers
Give us back the old RTS please
No Hornet?
THE NOSTALGIA
Why are the planes in my game maneuvering different. it only shows one plane and not the whole squadron... And instead of moving like planes, they just jerkingly move around. Is it a certain setting or game mode? Pls help
Rees Mayhew That is because you don't have the "Animate small objects" option checked in the graphics menu. Check the box next to it and wala, you can now see your planes in all their glory :D
why so large smokestack on Lexington?
lexington was supposed to be a battlecruiser that smoke stack was the smoke stack in the proposed project the lexington was a the first aircraft carrier of the us in 1941
+aries paddayuman Langley was build in 1915
The first aircraft carrier was created after ww1 ie 1922
26.000.000 free experience... i want this too!
By The way, How do you make Amazing/Cool games
Because it looks Very Nice
I miss this made of use the carriers :c
Shouldn’t fighters be able to shoot down other planes, it makes sense cuz when did they ever get missiles
I want also one for :How Unfair is to play against one until tier 7.
How about the Grafft zeplin?
How do you get aircraft carriers in this game?
Is there are only Carriers for Tier IV, VI, VII and X? Where are the fifth, seventh and ninth?
in WoWS Blitz
WHERE ARE THE BRITISH AIRCRAFT CARRIER'S?????
In the game
What about World of Warships Blitz for the appearance of British Carriers?
@@mystyle_jm8997 Nobody plays this game, the real game is on PC
@@mystyle_jm8997 world of warships biltz is Japan, America bias.
@@mystyle_jm8997 announced autumn 2021 iirc. Currently there are 2 premiums, Ark Royal and Indomitable.
3:31 is not midway
Aircraft carriers are basically WOT Arty in WOWs
not really, Carrier more to RTS
Im gonna get a hoshi soon , i need a few more stars.
just wanted to take a look
Hosho you mean
Ahh yes back when carriers were actually good
Guys, please tell me how to use a torpedo bomber and a bomber with manual attack in the newest 0.6.7 version. And why i cant make a manual torpedo attack. WHY ?
Matej Manevski Left ALT but only tier six and up ;)
world of warships have something wrong and missing they forgot to make submarine and then replace shinano and hakuryu battleship to aircraft carrier
I must say Zuihō looks a lot like Kaga if you just look at her from the bow
Thank you I couldn't find out how to get aircraft carriers because it doesn't show you on Xbox one
No Kaga?
These destroyers should list when they fire their main guns
sadly the Jet already gone
Hey can you?
add USS Enterprise
"they demonstrate the might of the imperial japanese navy"
Taihou: *gets one shotted by a torpedo*
any idea about what music plays from 3:14 to 5:20?
It's an in-game theme.
World of Warships - Friend or Foe
After 7 years… :)
If their gonna introduce a new AF line it should be UK
Somebody know the name of those 2 engine planes at 1:00 ? I think they weren't carrier born planes and they are not i the game anymore. But still, I'm looking for the name of that type of plane for like 1 year now, so if somebody still watching this vid and know the name of those planes plz answer me :D thx ^^
島風 It's either J5N1 Tenrai or Ki-83.
00:18, anyone know the BGM tittle?
I just wish that the dive bombers were more accurate since they only get one or two hits
What is the name of the first music? About 0:44
all soundtrack of world of warships: ruclips.net/video/0JhP4HHWmV8/видео.html
Bring back rts carriers. They were soo funn. And allowed poeple with bad gaming laptops to play
Where's the USS Yorktown Carrier and USS hornet on the US tech tree
From the Japanese where's the IJN Zuikaku, IJM Agaki and IJN Hiryu ?
Yep In division or class its right
Take back ships that is missing please
OK, once the new CV changes are out, please make another video like this one!!! Very Much Thanks in advance.
Poor graff zeppelin and KMS weser (formerly Seydlitz an admiral hipper class cruiser) never made it to the battle
Pls add the Habakkuk
The only missing on aircraft carrier tier x is enterprise
no, Enterprise was 1936 ship, she do well at tier 8, And Midway indeed perfect for tier 10
good times
Wow i am downloading this right now i mean it looks fun!!! :D
The only thing missing from legends
also y isnt there any kamakazie planes from japan
Kamikaze were from land based not carrier based
Im saving up for an aircraft carria