Want to design complex curved surfaces in Onshape? Look no further!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
  • Want to design stunning curved surfaces in Onshape? This beginner-friendly tutorial takes you step-by-step through . Learn essential commands like revolves, lofts, and sweeps, while exploring advanced features like curvature control and tangency constraints. Master surface analysis with Zebra stripes and unlock your design potential. Join me now and bring your 3D dreams to life!
    Join me in this tutorial and build this design with surface commands. Master revolve surface, split with sketch lines, then mirror and rotate, loft surface with curvature, ruled surface, fill command with tangency. With this curved surface finally a sweep of a circle and a pierce constraint. Analyze with zebra stripes the quality of your design.

Комментарии • 39

  • @pusnirizda5481
    @pusnirizda5481 Год назад +11

    Thanks for adding keypresses overlay! It''s just as awesome and useful as i expected it to be.

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад

      I'm glad that helps, and thank you for the suggestion.

  • @mysticmarble94
    @mysticmarble94 Год назад +8

    Finally a CAD channel that uses a keyboard overlay 🤌

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад +2

      one subscriber suggested that!

  • @professorsanjivkumargupta5595
    @professorsanjivkumargupta5595 Год назад +7

    Wonderful demonstration and I can appreciate your understanding of the 3 dimensional space and the construction geometry. Great going and thanks.

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @RichPenn
    @RichPenn Год назад +3

    Other than trying a simple loft , I have never looked at the surfacing tools.
    Thanks for the brief lesson in surfacing. Now I have a new project for the wet and cold weekend !!

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад +1

      Well, let's loft much more to heat things up!

  • @shedrackjassen913
    @shedrackjassen913 Месяц назад +1

    Finally, somebody who values being understood to flexing their skills ⭐⭐⭐

  • @YungSunBeats
    @YungSunBeats 2 месяца назад +1

    Recommend watching this in 1.5x. Still Learned a lot tho! Great job

    • @cademist
      @cademist  2 месяца назад

      Good to hear!

  • @garya418
    @garya418 Год назад +1

    Thanks for another awesome model.
    It will be fun to try this in Fusion 360. You have given enough clues.

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад

      You are giving me the idea to publish this on that side as well!

  • @hameedetemadi8390
    @hameedetemadi8390 Год назад +2

    Good Job

  • @foshyurgason
    @foshyurgason 4 месяца назад

    Very helpful. Cheers

    • @cademist
      @cademist  4 месяца назад

      Glad to hear it!

  • @alistairdrozario3590
    @alistairdrozario3590 5 месяцев назад

    Amazing thank you sooo much

    • @cademist
      @cademist  5 месяцев назад

      You're welcome 😊

  • @StephenEtherington
    @StephenEtherington 4 месяца назад

    Fantastic

    • @cademist
      @cademist  4 месяца назад

      Thank you so much 😀

  • @JorgeVismara
    @JorgeVismara 3 месяца назад +1

    thinking to 3D print this piece, I see you have not defined the thickness of the walls... where/when is that defined?
    thanks

    • @cademist
      @cademist  3 месяца назад +1

      That's the transition from surface to solid by "thicken" , which is the fifth command from the left on top.

  • @pusnirizda5481
    @pusnirizda5481 Год назад

    Thanks for the video!
    By the way, do you have any experience with a freecad? As a CAD newcomer i found it totally counterintuitive compared to onshape or fusion or even autocad. Any chance you can make a video making any model you like in freecad just for example?

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад

      I had a look at it so far, but have not really worked with it, although I share your interest.

  • @config2000
    @config2000 Год назад

    I would like to know a bit more about the purpose of surfaces. In terms of 3D printing do they have any practical reason to use them? I am stuck thinking that surfaces have no actual thickness.

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад +2

      They are more flexible for modeling-how could one have designed that fill surface otherwise? If you want to 3D-print that type of object you just apply a thickness (thicken is the command) and you are ready

    • @config2000
      @config2000 Год назад +1

      @@cademistAh, thicken is what I needed. I was trying the extrude option again after creating a surface from a sketch. That would only pick one part of the sketch pattern though. Thanks

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад +1

      I'm glad I could help you out@@config2000

  • @shedrackjassen913
    @shedrackjassen913 Месяц назад

    Why the .4 what does it have to do with anything at 6:30

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Месяц назад

      that is the magnitude value, a value to refine how much the curvature is matched.

    • @shedrackjassen913
      @shedrackjassen913 Месяц назад +1

      @@cademist
      Then why not use the tangency property so that they can match 100%?

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Месяц назад

      @@shedrackjassen913 good question-when you analyze the result though, the curvature takes not only the tangency, but the surface itself into the calculation.

    • @shedrackjassen913
      @shedrackjassen913 Месяц назад

      @cademist
      But then, why not set it to '1' (or 100, I don't know), so that the curvature can match better than that 0.4??

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Месяц назад

      @@shedrackjassen913 this value just appealed to me, it's not set in stone--

  • @professorsanjivkumargupta5595
    @professorsanjivkumargupta5595 Год назад

    Cannot use the fill tool. it says the requirements may be too high.

    • @cademist
      @cademist  Год назад +1

      First try "position". control your lines, especially the two arcs: there can't be any overlap!