Ready to dominate the GMAT? Try us FREE and see for yourself why students trust DTP for their GMAT Prep. Start your Free Trial: www.dominatetestprep.com/offers/VYpvBfXa
That's awesome, Shiv. Thanks for sharing. I'm glad you've been finding my videos helpful! And whenever you're ready to dive deeper, I know you'll benefit from my comprehensive course material as well: www.dominatethegmat.com/video-purchase/. Good luck!
Thank you Brett for ths video that pushed my traditional thought processes, especially @ 06:1 2 m/s, where chouice "D" seemed to be the 'equilateral' obvious choice was destoyed and you providede the definitive reasoning for choice "E".
Your videos are concise and very helpful. I suggest a video on applying logic rather than conventional math skills to solve questioins classified as "hard" on the GMA Quant section (both DS and PS)
+Alexander Gafoor I appreciate the recommendation and will look into it (obviously I cover those types of strategies in detail in my paid courses). In the meantime, here's an article I wrote that provides a great example of what you're asking about: www.dominatethegmat.com/2014/06/why-thomas-paine-would-have-crushed-the-gmat/. Enjoy!
No, eliminating A doesn't automatically eliminate B. If (1) is not sufficient by itself, it's still possible that (2) could be possible by itself. So the answer could still end up being B. And visa versa.
Ready to dominate the GMAT? Try us FREE and see for yourself why students trust DTP for their GMAT Prep.
Start your Free Trial: www.dominatetestprep.com/offers/VYpvBfXa
You did that Brett! You did that. Awesome. Clear & easy to understand. Thank you!
You are good!! Your lessons helped me a lot. I recently gave one mock test and now I can relate to the explanations of the questions even better.
That's awesome, Shiv. Thanks for sharing. I'm glad you've been finding my videos helpful! And whenever you're ready to dive deeper, I know you'll benefit from my comprehensive course material as well: www.dominatethegmat.com/video-purchase/. Good luck!
Thank you Brett for ths video that pushed my traditional thought processes, especially @ 06:1 2 m/s, where chouice "D" seemed to be the 'equilateral' obvious choice was destoyed and you providede the definitive reasoning for choice "E".
My pleasure, glad you found it helpful!
Your videos are concise and very helpful.
I suggest a video on applying logic rather than conventional math skills to solve questioins classified as "hard" on the GMA Quant section (both DS and PS)
+Alexander Gafoor I appreciate the recommendation and will look into it (obviously I cover those types of strategies in detail in my paid courses). In the meantime, here's an article I wrote that provides a great example of what you're asking about: www.dominatethegmat.com/2014/06/why-thomas-paine-would-have-crushed-the-gmat/. Enjoy!
Very clear in content and teaching
Thank you!
Thanks Brent!
You're welcome 😀.
Does Eliminating A and B automatically eliminates D too .Coz it says either statement 1 or statement 2 is sufficient alone .?
No, eliminating A doesn't automatically eliminate B. If (1) is not sufficient by itself, it's still possible that (2) could be possible by itself. So the answer could still end up being B. And visa versa.
Add verbal topics also
U didn't show the answer
What do you think it is?