"You can find any pattern you want to any level of precision you want as long as you're prepared to ignore enough data." That's a huge thing to realize.
You're all so right! Still, it's quite unbelievable, in this day and age, that people will listen to a person like Donald Trump. Sadly I guess it comes down to the premise of 'fake news' and the morons who buy into it!
you did take good look the public animate.. Corona exlude public, am i getting mad and they (beside the few moving wich axtract brain automaticly focus only those moving.. However now i told you look at the adience aint moving.. What adience aint moving...ahh then look closely examin some movements using cheap algoritme..and only part is moving other wise prob looked adience hockey game in the audience computer game! Wannah bet?
From the moment the first spin landed on "probability" I had a feeling it was going to be a long-haul joke; I just couldn't decide whether the wheel was weighted or it was done in multiple takes. Well done, Matt; and props to that audience for being so patient hahaha
I was sure the wheel was rigged... and, they probably could has saved a ton of time if they had rigged it. The participants spin the wheel clockwise, but Matt spins it counter. 🤔🤔🤔 And, once, even claims, "it does land on other colors".
"Texas, undone by a lone star" That's a lot funnier than the audience reaction gives it credit. That would have been mystery-bisuit worthy on Citation Needed.
Many in the audience likely just didn't get it as Texas being known as the "lone star state" might be common knowledge in the US but over here it's just a piece of American trivia that could win you a point during a pub quiz :D
[I mean no disrespect by this Comment.] The audience reaction is typically British. Low key, nothing to get too excited about, no need for any whooping or cheering or flag waving etc. Just a pun. We do puns. Meh. We Brits may not know about all the different US State names - familiar day-to-day names such as Nutmeg, Peach, Prairie, Show Me, Pelican, Badger, Beaver (steady...) simply don't feature in schools here, but I'm pretty sure everybody with enough curiosity to turn up to a Royal Institution lecture will have read enough to know that Kentucky's the Bluegrass State; Florida's the Sunshine State; New York's the Empire State; and that Texas is the Lone Star State. I doubt if many Brits know that South Dakota is ALSO a Sunshine State, or that Minnesota is the NORTH Star State; and we ain't got none o' them thar pesky Minnesota Gophers over here, neither...
"Maths is difficult, but the people who're enjoying maths are not the people who finds it easy but the people who enjoy how difficult it is." very inspiring.
Ignore teachers. Their teachers lied o them too. And the teacher then lied to his students.None of these quantum theorists have thought an original thought or questioned their fanaticism. And dogmatic religious fanaticism always holds back the pursuit of knowledge. As did the quantum forefathers... the religious fanatics running europe in the Renaissance. They stopped copernicus and Galileo from publishing. As with modern quantum clerics...The truth was too much to take.
Teacher here. When that happens to me, I sometimes like to go: Is there anyone who....[all hands in the air].... Peed their pants? :D humor is easy with kids, I love it.
The topics sex and procreation aren't harmful to children, and the phrase "a lot of my friends procreate" is the exactly same kind of phrase as "a lot of my friends have children".
At a disability lunch at the Bison Park, a man attending with his wife, introduced himself as a father of four! So what was this all about? He managed a heterosexual act four times?
The 3 cogs logo is a surprisingly common mistake. It happened at my work - a multi-national engineering firm. Upper management proudly emailed their new logo to tens of thousands of engineers, hilarity and red faces followed.
@@rhabenic in a drafting course that was required of civil engineering students, one day we were shown a video of a guy demonstrating how to go about sketching a threaded rod. He was doing a great job until he noticed that the threads on the model went the other way than in his sketch. I immediately laughed out loud as I knew what he was going to do correct the discrepancy. But when he turned the model end for end i was very disappointed to not hear anyone else laughing. I guess the guy thought that screws did not become left or right handed until they were given a head.
And, in the case of the gear train on the coin, it’s more complicated than just having an even number of cogs. The gear ratios have to be correct so that it runs smoothly without locking up.
@icemetalpunk This is what didn't happen: "Is it tails on one side?" "No, it is tails on 2 sides." It's so difficult to convey a different perspective!
Clearly, you don't run in truly geek circles! LOL (I don't either - now - but I was in an accelerated class with three super geniuses starting in fourth grade through 12th grade. Such a sentence would not have been at all unusual in that class!)
Yes it does. Not my choice when to start it - I think the fact they had 3 super geniuses meant they needed to up their game fast. Please note I was NOT one of the three!
Just went through the comments and I'm kinda shocked to see how little people appreciated this lecture. This guy is absolutely phenomenal. I was smiling throughout and learning some really cool stuff at the same time. He did an amazing job and I hope to see more from him on Ri. Huge fan, Matt!
There are thousands of comments and certainly you didn't read all of them? Even if you did what about all the people who watched but didn't comment(millions) which you can't know their level of appreciation. Maybe you appreciated it but you certainly didn't learn anything about ignoring data did you?
See, but by specifically mentioning that they didn't edit one bit out, they imply that they aren't editing anything else out! So it sort of sets us up.
@@katherinekellmeyer5428 Hi and Hello. I gather people for a good cause: I wanna provide people with Links leading to bad or toxic people. Mobber, Racists, Sexists, Bullies, more. I got the Links and i need help with reporting them. RUclips is in a bad state and i think you heard of that. Many complain about it, its strike-system and its CEO: Susan. But... I mean... complaining about the State of the world is nice and dandy, but... how about acting? Doing something? So i made a Wiki where i store Links for all to use. You can at least pre-emptive 'block user' regarding the Racists and all those, but you can also do one thing more and report them, so YT becomes a better place. Interested?
Here's one for the book. I learned in a highway design course that early on, they studied accident statistics and determined that, since accidents were more likely when driving on a curve or over a hill, that they could reduce the number of dangerous stretches of road by combining curves and hills whenever possible. This worked perfectly in achieving that result; of course that made the road even more dangerous.
@@sMASHsound our prof didn't say, but I think accident statistics might have had a hand in it. Either that and/or someone realized the logical error and explained it. Note that the people who made the invalid deduction might or might not have changed their minds. It is not as if there is a single cabal of engineers who make decisions about design methodology, and are the ones responsible for correcting their mistakes.
You can simulate the same phenomenon in a bathtub full of water. If you shove your hands back and forth randomly, no meaningful waves will form. Only if you hit the resonance frequency of the tub (that is dependant on the size and shape of the tub) will a big wave form. For normal sized tubs that means pushing way slower than your intuition tells you.
I've been very pedantic regarding the "stars where the moon should be" for years now, the difference between me and Matt is that he makes people laugh about it and I make people want to throw things at my face.
It's our birthday today! And we couldn't think of a better present than this extremely enjoyable talk all about maths and what happens when it goes wrong. We've even been told there's Pi. Mm, pi...
I'm really sad more people didn't get the joke, but I can't honestly expect people in the UK to know the nicknames of the states when I don't even fully understand exactly what countries and regions "the UK" even is.
Great show from Matt as usual! And Happy Birthday RI! The cogs thing reminds me of when my wife showed me her team's illustration of a marketing process with interlocking cogs: "that won't work!" I said. She was unconvinced it would matter, but did go back with my fixes. The next customer she spoke to confirmed that they were all engineers and, yes, it would have been a major barrier to credibility if they'd carried on with it as it was. I don't think I got any brownie points: she just realised that 'nerd' is a wider-spread condition than she'd thought.
@@stupidtreehugger Ummm, excuse me, what the frick? That is the most forced transition I have heard in a long time and I don't see how your single-origin stuff is related to the original comment or video in *any* way whatsoever. I'd write you off as a bot if it wasn't for this horrible introduction that shared a word with the original comment. That would still be impressive to pull of for a bot.
In the crescent moon misrepresentation, Matt correctly points out that stars shouldn’t be drawn inside the moon’s circumference. What is more troubling (to me) is that the tips of the horns have to be antipodal, I.e. 180 degrees apart.
The glitch in the matrix started when the 'guest' spinner was supposed to call out the category, but then Matt did for the teen and adult. A good use of a Good Hour! Keep up the great content!
@ K W I know what you mean, but the logic of what you actually said doesn't work. If you never thought that "X is my favourite mathematician" was something you'd say about a mathematician, then that suggests you thought you'd say it about a non-mathmatician, which obviously is then a paradox.
@@MrDannyDetail I don't think never thinking to say "X is my favourite mathematician" about mathematicians implies that they would have thought it of non-mathematicians either. It definitely makes it ·strange· to specify mathematicians, but that doesn't necessitate that they would have thought about it at all. "I would have never thought I would have a favourite member of set A that was in set A" is logically equivalent to "I would have never thought I would have a favourite member of set A", since any favourite one could have from set A must also ·be· in set A. I think this is more of a linguistic question of what including that redundant detail implies of the speaker, rather than a question of logic. When it comes to language, including unnecessary details like that imply that there exists a possibility that something could've been otherwise, or at least that the speaker thinks so. "I picked up a stone, and it was a stone" is completely true and logically valid, but the fact that the second clause is in there makes it sound like it the speaker is surprised that the stone was a stone, which is an illogical thing to be surprised by.
@@liebert234 Great response! As you say it's a linguistic amibiguity that depends on whether you consider the 'about a mathematician' part to be unnecessary repetition of the same fact, or a new piece of information that's critical to the intended meaning, which in turn depends on how the person says it. Perhaps I misspoke when using the word 'logic', but I'm not sure what other word could be used in it's place. I mean the deduction that the repetition would not be there unless it conveyed the possibility that something could have been otherwise, is itself a form of logic. I guess it only fails to be true logic because it would be an assumption rather than a hard fact.
You know, when it landed on probability the first time, I figured that Matt had rigged it to land on probability all three times. I did not expect him to have people spin it until it got green all three times, I figured these talks had a time time schedule and at 1:07 it had probably already spilled over by a bit. Bravo.
When wheel landed on purple the 2nd time i suspected it was rigged but I underestimated Matt. He actually went out of his way to involve the audience and editors to fool us viewers! Love it!
I just recently started realising what Matt meant when he said that math is about "getting it wrong and working towards the right answer". That is exactly what my current course in Applied Mathematics is like - that course is about a bunch of super-complicated equations that simply cannot be solved exactly, and instead require a lot of trial and error with various approximation techniques.
Hats off to you, Matt! Loved it, esp. the ending -- @ 1:07:14 "...and I'm like, yeah, people have to earn the book"......yes, Matt, I'll do that.....thank you for this superb video!
You raise an interesting point, except that he probably could have better explained. This is a skewed distribution, so in this case the average is in fact better than 50% of the books.
Actually, median, mean and mode can all be called average, which is where a lot of misleading statistics comes from. I read this in Darell Huff's excellent book "How to Lie with Statistics".
I used the median recently in a report and to avoid the confusion of talking about the 'average' value, and knowing that the audience would not have heard of the median, I referred to the result as the 'typical' value i.e. the typical number of days worked, rather than the average number of days worked.
I honestly thought the wheel was rigged, as the audience were turning it clockwise and matt was spinning it anti-clockwise and there was some mechanism that only worked in one direction.
more pertinently what are the odds of a complex clockwise/anti-clockwise fixing mechanism versus matt just re spinning till he get's green and editing the video But to answer your question, it's 1 in 5, or for 3 probability in a row I believe it's 1 in 125 (1 in 5^3)
i thought the same thing. and after he said the "dont believe everything you see on the internet" thing, i thought "but what if the video ISNT edited?"
I love the idea of maths being a progression in which you get less and less wrong. At school I got a lot wrong. Five years later I met my old maths teacher and he asked me what I was doing now. I was able to tell him that I was teaching maths!
Mildly interesting probability story. I once visited Tokyo and during a wild night out lost my mobile phone. The next day my friend received a phonecall to come and pick up my phone. Turns out, it had been picked up by someone I had gone to primary school with 15 years prior who had recognised me in the photos on my phone, had contacted back to our mutual home country to get all the relevant phone numbers and then called through to arrange a meeting spot. The chances are pretty small and I am eternally thankful they went to the effort.
I don't know about luck. what I do know is that it has nothing to do with my comment that you are replying to. Maybe you meant to put in the main thread?
Of the 300+ video's I've watched on math and science, Matt Parker is my absolute favorite presenter. I am surprised, however, that a man of his obvious brilliant intellect would to ask, "Can everyone hear me OK?" as if anyone who couldn't hear him could possibly answer a question they haven't been able to hear!?!?! That sounds a bit like asking the audience, "Please raise your hand if you were unable to be here tonight"? LOL!
46:20 remembered a quote that is incredibly relevant to what he says here "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong" - Albert Einstein I remembered that from a Space Engineers loading screen, I don't look up Albert Einstein quotes in my free time fyi
45:15 Another fact that has to be considered is that the projections that the maps used to pinpoint the locations could also affect the shape. The previous researcher could have even selected the same locations on a different kind of a projection and identified another pattern. They're just random conincidents.
I wonder how many RUclips videos I'm in? It's actually scary to think there has almost certainly been a time, where someone online looked at me in the background of someone else's video (from a local vlogger or filmmaker for example). It's not scary that someone has seen me, what's scary is that I'm still there right now, and there are many short moments of my life literally sitting in servers all over the world, accessible to almost anyone.
To speak to the probability stories in this video: My wife is originally from Utah, and her dad grew up in American Fork. After we moved to the Portland, Oregon area, we were in a mall where we overheard a woman talking to a store clerk about her upcoming voyage to Utah. We had just moved to Oregon (literally a few months before), and we interjected ourselves into the conversation saying that we had just moved from Utah and was curious as to where she was going. She mentioned where she was going, but she also happened to mention that she lived in American Fork for a while. My wife said, "That's where my dad's from!" She asked his name, and when my wife told her his name, she exclaimed, "I dated your dad in junior high school!" We were BLOWN AWAY. Right then, my wife called her dad, and they talked for about twenty minutes on the phone in the most impromptu lovers' reunion I had ever experienced. It still brings a smile to my face.
Mmm... it's no longer something that happens to somebody in the world, but now we need to take into account it happening to a viewer of Mats video. That is a much lower chance.
@@renedekker9806 You have to increase the probability by a factor of how many strange coincidences you allow, as well as distance from the teller of the story. Matt's specific examples revolved around pictures shown to those about to get married. Now we're up to meeting someone who had a passing relationship with n degrees of separation. Each of these makes things exponentially more probable.
Last summer a young lady I had never met had her small puppy named "Stevie Nix" chase my young kitten named "Little Richard" up a tree. Strange coincidence? Sure, but that's not the real strange coincidence. After finally retrieving poor Little Richard, we got to talking and discovered that we had both gone to the same high school - 4500 km away. Albeit 40 years apart That was a day to play the lottery.
@@MrSJPowell Not to mention that we have to factor in what constitutes a "weird occurence". If there are no rules set up before hand, literally anything goes. While it is unlikely that one specifik freak occurrence happens to one person, and it is likely that it will happen to someone at least once, it is also,. by the same logic and reasoning, impossible to go through life without experiencing at least one weird event as an individual. You just need to look for the patterns.
Small number of people in the same location. And its easy. Only 300+million outta a few billion so what are the odds? Remember most Americans never leave the States. East coast to West coast its not even the entire continent.
When it fell on "probability" the second time I joked to myself, "what's the probability of that!?". When it happened the third time I thought, surely it's rigged, but then I remembered you spinning it at the beginning and then you spun it again. Once you revealed the truth, it put my mind at ease, "oh thank God, it's just someone on the internet lying to me.".
I'll have to say that the way you brought this with comedy, metaphors and plot twist this is one of the best shows I have seen so far. Amazing work I'm a great fan or yours
I was in an 80 story building during construction that during a strong wind storm that started twisting ( not just swaying) like crazy. It was quite scary. This was before the mass damper tank was constructed on top which I’m sure was where all the maths came in 😊
I worked in a brand new office building in Florida, someone didn't do their maths right because the first time we had a big wind storm the building bent and twisted enough to make some of the windows pop out of their frames. Anyone who parked in the lot adjacent to the building (think: upper management) had huge sheets of glass falling on their cars.
Matt, I'm from Texas and it's obvious that star is where it is from gravitational lensing. On an unrelated note, I'm not sure how to convey in text when my voice clearly indicates I'm grasping at straws.
This makes me realize how easy it is to mess something up. Like imagine writing an entire movie franchise without having these kind of mistakes would be so hard.
I used to be a C++ software engineer. Before that I was an Ada software engineer. The Ada language has built in checks, one of which is a constraint error. If you get a constraint error, which is propagated out of the program - which goes up wires, which means different things to different bits, which... bang. I had the ESA crash report for Arian 501 pinned to my cubicle wall for decades :)
It has to leave the atmosphere at an angle or else the friction from the atmosphere burns up the shuttle. Like how it is softer to dive into a pool than it is to do a cannon ball.
As a math major during the Middle Ages (actually, the 1970s), I loved your lecture. Also, as an amateur astronomer in the 1960s, I seem to recall an image of a crescent moon with a star coming through the dark side. We had a good laugh about that.
"Till clomb above the eastern bar / The hornèd Moon, with one bright star / Within the nether tip." The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
I found this video while aimlessly browsing (It's COVID time and I'm bored). Well, it could be a turning point in my life, or not... But either way, thank you so much for sharing your time, energy, friends, and family with the rest of us. For now, my lips are frozen in the shape of a big warm smile.
cuh. and I thought j was the square root of -1 when all along it was i. i of all things.
5 лет назад+4
Just recently I learned that English doesn't actually have real rules, which is crazy to me as a German, where there are rules for everything in language. And they were even recently changed to be more logical: GAR NICHT SCHEIẞE!
Although I will probably (pun intended) never be a huge maths enthusiast myself. I can appreciate the fun you can do with it and the important part it plays in the world we live in. Thanks for this interesting video! My younger self would've never believed I'd spend an entire hour watching a video about math in my spare time and enjoy it ;-).
This is perhaps one of the hardest things to teach: that it's okay to make mistakes. The first solution you come to doesn't matter. What does matter is how you came to that solution, and what you do to make subsequent solutions better.
South Korea, buildings, exercising Paul Shepherd and Jenga! (relates to the bridge feedback chapter). There is a Korean show on netflix called "my Mister" where the lead plays a civil engineer who designs buildings, and it mentions a building he designed where a gym caused problems and the damping mechanism he put in to counter it.
Wonderful video! I really enjoyed it. One quibble though. The Ariane 5 failure was not a math error. It was a software engineering failure. The program was designed correctly for the requirements they had for Ariane 4. The problem is that they didn't recheck it for the range of inputs that the Ariane 5 would produce. The failure would've been detected if they had simply simulated the launch. (IIRC, they did see it in some simulations but they just rebooted and ran it again. I could be wrong about this.) They had redundant data processing units in the rocket and they assumed that if there was a crash, the other units would take over. Unfortunately, all the computers were using the same inputs and the same software, so they all simultaneously crashed. This is a classic software engineering cautionary tale about the dangers of reusing software.
and an even greater one of taking shortcuts, and not looking into all the what ifs. cascading failures indicate an inherent overall software design fault
Great Presentation - I like math because no matter how long it takes me to get to a solution, the math never gets mad or frustrated - it patiently waits for me to succeed!
I have 4 probability events similar to the young couple who were strangers in the same photograph as children: 1. My sister was visiting Hawaii with a girlfriend and while there, unexpectedly met the husband of another friend. She recognized him. Turns out that she had met him 40 years earlier at his house when we were all children. We were at their house to encounter buggy driving with Shettland ponies. I was 8. Why she remembered the boy and this event was because of her keen interest in the beautiful drawing of a male African lion's head on the wall of this boy's bedroom (which he had drawn). She was a budding artist at the time. Fast forward up to her trip to Hawaii and recognizing him although he was thoroughly stumped who this woman was who was describing his childhood home to great detail back in California 1966. 2. My niece was getting married in Washington state into a family of preachers. The the family tree branch this young man was on was lateral to the one that I and my siblings were familiar with, but with the same sir name and same grandmother. At the family dinner prior to the wedding day, I was seated at the patriarchal table next to the matriarch of the family, herself. We strike up conversation and she asks me where I live. (central California) She says, "Is that a fact", well do you know my dear friend Victor D.?" I reply, astonished, "why, yes I know him, in fact we play music at church together almost every week!!... How do you...?" . She replies, "we adopted him and his family when he was a child in Burma. How is he doing?" 3. My daughter, who grew up in Central California, decided to attend college out of state. Her best friend, Meg, would take my daughter home with her during breaks because of the long distance back home to California. On one occasion, Meg's uncle states, "So, I understand we are related." Intrigued, my daughter asks how they could be related. "If your last name is _________, and your dad's name is _________, then your grandfather is Donald, his father was Walt, mother Ev.....and proceeded to name off our immediate up-line (to borrow a marketing term) all the way to the branching where their family name changed when their great grandmother married. The girls became cousins after being friends for years. 4. My most improbable event because of the ending....read on. Just before entering high school our family moved from southern California to central Pennsylvania. I attended a boarding academy there. In early Fall of my sophomore year, a busload of us students were on a club or band trip. As luck would have it, I got to sit with several very cute girls, chatting about this and that, and well, just about everything. Suddenly all the mannerisms of one of them reminded me of a former classmate I'd had a crush on in grade school back in California, a mere 4 years earlier. I turned to her and exclaimed, "sweetie, do you know who you remind me of??!! When I opened my mouth to utter the answer, what was heard was in the voice of one of the other new girls to the school: "Theresa ________!!!" she shot out in unison to my own "Theresa________!!!" "Wait!! Where do you know Theresa from??!!" California. "Wait!!, where do YOU know her from??!!" "Montana". It really IS a smaller world then we expect.
There is a dog park at the end of the Tacoma Narrows bridges where I was taking my dog for a few weeks before I noticed a plaque dedicating the park to Tubby, a dog who was the sole victim of the first Tacoma Narrows bridge. She was too afraid and wouldn't get out of the car.
The Parker square needs no justification. Except that it does. That is an inherent property of a Parker square. That is THE inherent property of a Parker square.
Times are changing - en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/dice - "Historically, dice is the plural of die, but in modern standard English dice is both the singular and the plural: throw the dice could mean a reference to either one or more than one dice."
People really should say "dice" for the singular form and "dices" for the plural form. The only reason why people are uncomfortable with those forms is because those aren't the official spellings.
@@qwertyuiopzxcfgh Not really, most languages are just arbitrary like that. Ideally, all words should use regular forms, since this would be much more convenient, but reality is always more complex than that.
Having got married in 1990 a few years on we were discussing a particular music festival in 1983 and I had photos of my group mucking about outside our tents. She then pointed to the next row of tents - and the one actually pitched next to mine - and said "hey - that's my tent!" We didn't meet until around 1988.
I notice the 'stars visible through the moon' mistake in many popular anime shows even today, I guess the lack of basic astronomy knowledge is common even for professional artists
This is my favourite Matt Parker video because not only is it the length of a feature film, but it has the plot twists of one too.
I got the "aw come on" reaction when he said "what are the chances" at the second probability roll, because that's some dad level pun. It wasn't.
Still a better love story than twilight?
@@JB-ym4up: Static white noise has a better lovestory than twilight.
I was like... the probability of getting probability 3 times is 1/5^3 = 1/125 = 0.8%, or 1 out of 125. WHAT ARE THE ODDS lol.
I'm genuinely not sure if he was serious about the spinner or not.
"You can find any pattern you want to any level of precision you want as long as you're prepared to ignore enough data."
That's a huge thing to realize.
The basis of every crazy conspiracy theory. 😂
that's like the definition of bias ... DUH~
You're all so right! Still, it's quite unbelievable, in this day and age, that people will listen to a person like Donald Trump. Sadly I guess it comes down to the premise of 'fake news' and the morons who buy into it!
Hence if Pi turns out to be truly random, every single number is somewhere in it, and even every written work (encoded by any/every encoding system)
@@tristanridley1601 Nice observation!☺
People in the live audience have no idea how huge those name drops were. "My friend James Grime... My friend Tom Scott..."
They didn't know about Matt's huge nerd clout.
you did take good look the public animate.. Corona exlude public, am i getting mad and they (beside the few moving wich axtract brain automaticly focus only those moving.. However now i told you look at the adience aint moving.. What adience aint moving...ahh then look closely examin some movements using cheap algoritme..and only part is moving other wise prob looked adience hockey game in the audience computer game! Wannah bet?
@@raadtmaarwat5781 I am sorry, do you know English?
James Grime ? Tom Scott ?
My favourite Easter eggs.
From the moment the first spin landed on "probability" I had a feeling it was going to be a long-haul joke; I just couldn't decide whether the wheel was weighted or it was done in multiple takes. Well done, Matt; and props to that audience for being so patient hahaha
Yeah, that was possibly going to happen.
As soon as I saw probability as a subject to be chosen *at random* my eyes narrowed. Well done.
same
@@joyfuljaj :
me also
not only was it chosen at random, it was chosen at random 3 times out of 3
I was sure the wheel was rigged... and, they probably could has saved a ton of time if they had rigged it. The participants spin the wheel clockwise, but Matt spins it counter. 🤔🤔🤔 And, once, even claims, "it does land on other colors".
@@HappyBeezerStudios What are the chances of that?
"Texas, undone by a lone star"
That's a lot funnier than the audience reaction gives it credit. That would have been mystery-bisuit worthy on Citation Needed.
Tim H. Exactly what I thought!
Many in the audience likely just didn't get it as Texas being known as the "lone star state" might be common knowledge in the US but over here it's just a piece of American trivia that could win you a point during a pub quiz :D
[I mean no disrespect by this Comment.] The audience reaction is typically British. Low key, nothing to get too excited about, no need for any whooping or cheering or flag waving etc. Just a pun. We do puns. Meh.
We Brits may not know about all the different US State names - familiar day-to-day names such as Nutmeg, Peach, Prairie, Show Me, Pelican, Badger, Beaver (steady...) simply don't feature in schools here, but I'm pretty sure everybody with enough curiosity to turn up to a Royal Institution lecture will have read enough to know that Kentucky's the Bluegrass State; Florida's the Sunshine State; New York's the Empire State; and that Texas is the Lone Star State.
I doubt if many Brits know that South Dakota is ALSO a Sunshine State, or that Minnesota is the NORTH Star State; and we ain't got none o' them thar pesky Minnesota Gophers over here, neither...
@@EleanorPeterson This is the most British comment I've ever read.
The lone Star State (:TEXAS :) !! Love TX
"Maths is difficult, but the people who're enjoying maths are not the people who finds it easy but the people who enjoy how difficult it is."
very inspiring.
who're is not a word.
@@Michelle-pn9xt it’s included in several dictionaries although it’s considered improper for formal use. But it is a word.
@@peteconrad2077 But look how hilarious it is omg. Another eg.
@@Michelle-pn9xt But you're
@@huskiehuskerson5300 it probably is to little minds....
"Texas undone by a lone star.", is a great line. I think you would have gotten a bigger laugh in the states.
haha I was surprised by the silence, forgot where the talk was
@escorpiuser Texas is nicknamed "the lone star state"
Matt did the same thing at google and somehow got even less laughs.
@@melvyniandrag that still isn't funny.
@@TXDude not to be rude but math is one of the largest components of physics. Math is at the core of it all.
Probability comes for the second time:
"What are the chances!?"
Audience: "..."
@omar garaali Thanks
@@janas.8735 np fam
It's because he edited out the spins that weren't probability, meaning the audience were in on it
@@joshwatt5434He did? When does he say that?
@@oscarthegrouch23 this comment is two years old and I am not rewatching to find out what this was about lol
"Are there any... wait for the end of the sentence."
This has 'teacher' written all over it, I love it
@MichaelKingsfordGray it has work boss stapled all over it.
Ignore teachers. Their teachers lied o them too. And the teacher then lied to his students.None of these quantum theorists have thought an original thought or questioned their fanaticism. And dogmatic religious fanaticism always holds back the pursuit of knowledge. As did the quantum forefathers... the religious fanatics running europe in the Renaissance. They stopped copernicus and Galileo from publishing. As with modern quantum clerics...The truth was too much to take.
Teacher here. When that happens to me, I sometimes like to go:
Is there anyone who....[all hands in the air].... Peed their pants?
:D humor is easy with kids, I love it.
@@classicalphysic What.
Wait for the end, not if Sheldon Cooper said it. It would still be going on.
"Lots of my friends procreate" as a bridge to talking about children's books was suboptimally received.
The topics sex and procreation aren't harmful to children, and the phrase "a lot of my friends procreate" is the exactly same kind of phrase as "a lot of my friends have children".
Well said
And he said so calmly lol
At a disability lunch at the Bison Park, a man attending with his wife, introduced himself as a father of four! So what was this all about? He managed a heterosexual act four times?
Well, you could say it was optimally received, if the desired variable were "unease."
Just optimized for a different variable than you anticipated.
"But neither of them are going anywhere because parents are jamming up the whole system..."
fell out my chair, Matt
The 3 cogs logo is a surprisingly common mistake. It happened at my work - a multi-national engineering firm. Upper management proudly emailed their new logo to tens of thousands of engineers, hilarity and red faces followed.
Ha! Not a 'good look' for an engineering company, I presume.
@@rhabenic in a drafting course that was required of civil engineering students, one day we were shown a video of a guy demonstrating how to go about sketching a threaded rod. He was doing a great job until he noticed that the threads on the model went the other way than in his sketch. I immediately laughed out loud as I knew what he was going to do correct the discrepancy. But when he turned the model end for end i was very disappointed to not hear anyone else laughing.
I guess the guy thought that screws did not become left or right handed until they were given a head.
@@AlDunbar I laughed so hard
and it was the artist that decided to make it work...
And, in the case of the gear train on the coin, it’s more complicated than just having an even number of cogs. The gear ratios have to be correct so that it runs smoothly without locking up.
"Is it a head on both sides"
"No"
"Is it tails on one side"
"Yes"
Wait a minute...
I thought the same thing! "So it could be tails on both sides?"
The number of sides which are tails is 1.
Not "1 side is tails, but this tells me nothing about the other side."
hahahahahahaha
@icemetalpunk
This is what didn't happen:
"Is it tails on one side?"
"No, it is tails on 2 sides."
It's so difficult to convey a different perspective!
Yes, that was my instant reaction as well.
This guy would have done well as a lawyer.
Watching Matt keep holding back smiles as his wife demonstrates the evidence of the recovery was amazing. That's a team.
"A lot of my friends procreate" is one of the strangest sentences I've ever heard. (9:56)
Clearly, you don't run in truly geek circles! LOL (I don't either - now - but I was in an accelerated class with three super geniuses starting in fourth grade through 12th grade. Such a sentence would not have been at all unusual in that class!)
What does that mean?
@Sathvick Satish
The most common word that is very close in meaning "reproduce"
@@julieenslow5915 That seems a little bit young to be using that sentence, even in an accelerated class.
Yes it does. Not my choice when to start it - I think the fact they had 3 super geniuses meant they needed to up their game fast. Please note I was NOT one of the three!
Just went through the comments and I'm kinda shocked to see how little people appreciated this lecture. This guy is absolutely phenomenal. I was smiling throughout and learning some really cool stuff at the same time. He did an amazing job and I hope to see more from him on Ri. Huge fan, Matt!
There's not enough of us in this world who appreciate knowledge... who possibly want to expand themselves, learning new topics... he's quite good...
There are thousands of comments and certainly you didn't read all of them? Even if you did what about all the people who watched but didn't comment(millions) which you can't know their level of appreciation. Maybe you appreciated it but you certainly didn't learn anything about ignoring data did you?
As an Australian, watching him discuss the ancient Woolworth stores in England is fascinating.
I'm a simple man. I see Matt Parker on RI, I hit like and binge an hour watching him rant about numbers
This is true
you have failed to use the word "binge" correctly
please try again
your not the only one.
I hit like and made the number of likes the first 3 digits of pi.
Nice.
(Assuming an accuracy over 3 digits, no rounding)
@@lunadusk8590 you have failed to use the word "your" correctly
please try again
3:08 "were not gonna edit it out" but you will edit out the 50+ spins of that wheel
tis the point of the talk
See, but by specifically mentioning that they didn't edit one bit out, they imply that they aren't editing anything else out! So it sort of sets us up.
@@katherinekellmeyer5428 Hi and Hello.
I gather people for a good cause:
I wanna provide people with Links leading to bad or toxic people.
Mobber, Racists, Sexists, Bullies, more. I got the Links and i
need help with reporting them.
RUclips is in a bad state and i think you heard of that.
Many complain about it, its strike-system and its CEO: Susan.
But... I mean... complaining about the State of the world is nice
and dandy, but... how about acting? Doing something?
So i made a Wiki where i store Links for all to use.
You can at least pre-emptive 'block user' regarding the
Racists and all those, but you can also
do one thing more and report them, so
YT becomes a better place.
Interested?
we're*
Here's one for the book. I learned in a highway design course that early on, they studied accident statistics and determined that, since accidents were more likely when driving on a curve or over a hill, that they could reduce the number of dangerous stretches of road by combining curves and hills whenever possible. This worked perfectly in achieving that result; of course that made the road even more dangerous.
lolllllllllllll. if that was early on, im interested to know what they did later on.
@@sMASHsound when they realized their error they stopped designing roads that way.
@@AlDunbar what led them to realize it what bad?
@@sMASHsound our prof didn't say, but I think accident statistics might have had a hand in it. Either that and/or someone realized the logical error and explained it.
Note that the people who made the invalid deduction might or might not have changed their minds. It is not as if there is a single cabal of engineers who make decisions about design methodology, and are the ones responsible for correcting their mistakes.
There is another road in Spain I think that is completely straight and has one of the highest accident rates in the world. It is a very long road.
"In every second story, everybody died."
Perfectly balanced...
*Harvey Dent wants to know your location*
...as all things should be
Thanos would be proud
That put a smile on my face.
not quite because if there is an odd number of stories its not balanced ruclips.net/video/prh72BLNjIk/видео.html
When he showed the falling Jenga tower that required less energy because of the resonance, that was absolutely amazing.
You can simulate the same phenomenon in a bathtub full of water. If you shove your hands back and forth randomly, no meaningful waves will form. Only if you hit the resonance frequency of the tub (that is dependant on the size and shape of the tub) will a big wave form.
For normal sized tubs that means pushing way slower than your intuition tells you.
Its so easy to show.
Take a swing set.
Watch someone swing.
There you go?
@@DacuberTM I thought the same about swinging and how it's like two things (the person and the swing) moving synchronously
now go find a gyroscope.
I've been very pedantic regarding the "stars where the moon should be" for years now, the difference between me and Matt is that he makes people laugh about it and I make people want to throw things at my face.
It's our birthday today! And we couldn't think of a better present than this extremely enjoyable talk all about maths and what happens when it goes wrong. We've even been told there's Pi. Mm, pi...
Happy birthday! And thank you: you make my day any time you publish a new video!
Greetings from Italy!
The Royal Institution HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
My birthday too, how improbable.
(:
Happy Birthday The Royal Institution.
Keeping up the good work for another year :)
"Texas, undone by a Lone Star." Very nicely done.
Bob, Squirrel King honestly, how did that not get more applause
@@skylerbirch8248 Because it's in England... literally NO ONE in England knows Texas IS "the lone star state"
eidodk ah, I thought it was a more common name across the way
Connor Mcnally huh. Well thanks for educating me on this lol
I'm really sad more people didn't get the joke, but I can't honestly expect people in the UK to know the nicknames of the states when I don't even fully understand exactly what countries and regions "the UK" even is.
It's amusing when he asks Lucy what is her research, as if he doesn't know.
It's even more amusing when you realise they are married.
Great show from Matt as usual! And Happy Birthday RI!
The cogs thing reminds me of when my wife showed me her team's illustration of a marketing process with interlocking cogs: "that won't work!" I said. She was unconvinced it would matter, but did go back with my fixes. The next customer she spoke to confirmed that they were all engineers and, yes, it would have been a major barrier to credibility if they'd carried on with it as it was. I don't think I got any brownie points: she just realised that 'nerd' is a wider-spread condition than she'd thought.
@@stupidtreehugger Do you realize that none of those links work?
IceMetalPunk, LMAO. 😂😅🤣
@@stupidtreehugger Ummm, excuse me, what the frick? That is the most forced transition I have heard in a long time and I don't see how your single-origin stuff is related to the original comment or video in *any* way whatsoever.
I'd write you off as a bot if it wasn't for this horrible introduction that shared a word with the original comment. That would still be impressive to pull of for a bot.
Bwahahahahaha!
Thats a good one!! 👌
I liked this video purely for the joke
“Troops should not break... dance”
This guy is precisely my kind of pedantic nerd, and I freaking love it
In the crescent moon misrepresentation, Matt correctly points out that stars shouldn’t be drawn inside the moon’s circumference. What is more troubling (to me) is that the tips of the horns have to be antipodal, I.e. 180 degrees apart.
The glitch in the matrix started when the 'guest' spinner was supposed to call out the category, but then Matt did for the teen and adult. A good use of a Good Hour! Keep up the great content!
Parker is my favorite mathematician which is something I never thought I'd say about a mathematician xD.
Except he doesn't do what a mathematician should. He is rather a standup comedist.
And what "should" a mathematician do, exactly? You do realize that people can be more than one thing, right?
@ K W I know what you mean, but the logic of what you actually said doesn't work. If you never thought that "X is my favourite mathematician" was something you'd say about a mathematician, then that suggests you thought you'd say it about a non-mathmatician, which obviously is then a paradox.
@@MrDannyDetail I don't think never thinking to say "X is my favourite mathematician" about mathematicians implies that they would have thought it of non-mathematicians either. It definitely makes it ·strange· to specify mathematicians, but that doesn't necessitate that they would have thought about it at all.
"I would have never thought I would have a favourite member of set A that was in set A" is logically equivalent to "I would have never thought I would have a favourite member of set A", since any favourite one could have from set A must also ·be· in set A.
I think this is more of a linguistic question of what including that redundant detail implies of the speaker, rather than a question of logic. When it comes to language, including unnecessary details like that imply that there exists a possibility that something could've been otherwise, or at least that the speaker thinks so.
"I picked up a stone, and it was a stone" is completely true and logically valid, but the fact that the second clause is in there makes it sound like it the speaker is surprised that the stone was a stone, which is an illogical thing to be surprised by.
@@liebert234 Great response! As you say it's a linguistic amibiguity that depends on whether you consider the 'about a mathematician' part to be unnecessary repetition of the same fact, or a new piece of information that's critical to the intended meaning, which in turn depends on how the person says it.
Perhaps I misspoke when using the word 'logic', but I'm not sure what other word could be used in it's place. I mean the deduction that the repetition would not be there unless it conveyed the possibility that something could have been otherwise, is itself a form of logic. I guess it only fails to be true logic because it would be an assumption rather than a hard fact.
You know, when it landed on probability the first time, I figured that Matt had rigged it to land on probability all three times. I did not expect him to have people spin it until it got green all three times, I figured these talks had a time time schedule and at 1:07 it had probably already spilled over by a bit. Bravo.
Some game of luck
maths and doing things incorrectly, finally a video showcasing both of my skills.
Parker maths
I remember his last lecture. Good to see you again matt.
Matt, Thank you very much for being honest that took so many times to get three instances of Probability.
I thought it was a crooked wheel...
it's scripted that he will reveal it though
When wheel landed on purple the 2nd time i suspected it was rigged but I underestimated Matt. He actually went out of his way to involve the audience and editors to fool us viewers! Love it!
Fun with magnets!
Man, about five spins each time
When Matt asked "Does the coin have two heads?" and "Is there tails on one side?" it still could have been a coin with two tails :)
If there's tails on one side there's tails on one side.
@Sthaman Sinha How do you know? That doesn't follow from the data available at that point.
@@KaiHenningsen
I think (s)he means that "tails on one side" is supposed to explicitly say that there is a tails on ONLY one side.
he stressed 'one' so i assume he meant 'only one side'
@@sleekotter1109 But still, that's not tails on only one side.
I just recently started realising what Matt meant when he said that math is about "getting it wrong and working towards the right answer". That is exactly what my current course in Applied Mathematics is like - that course is about a bunch of super-complicated equations that simply cannot be solved exactly, and instead require a lot of trial and error with various approximation techniques.
"Making cogs grate again"?
Tim Fairless puns will never grind my gears
OMG that joke totally flew over my head when he said that in the video. I totally forgot that great had a homonym.
I wonder how many people didn't get that, also the the three cogs cannot rotate? Maybe they are not cognisant😬
OH. That's good. I did not get that at first.
@@MrDannyDetail *homophone
Omg, by the third one, I knew something was up but I thought it was a weighted wheel or something 😂
Also the props he had on him.
Nothing was up. That's why he said he'd never use the wheel again, because he wanted to bring up something else than probability 3 times.
solomonarbc I’m not sure if this comment was meant to be a joke but he said that they just cut out all the footage in the middle
@@aryamankejriwal5959 I think he was joking about that. Like he said, don't believe everything you learn on the internet. >:)
OrangeC7 😂😅
Hats off to you, Matt! Loved it, esp. the ending -- @ 1:07:14 "...and I'm like, yeah, people have to earn the book"......yes, Matt, I'll do that.....thank you for this superb video!
"Average means I'm above 50% of books"
Should we from now on call median a Parker average? I'm fine with that.
You raise an interesting point, except that he probably could have better explained. This is a skewed distribution, so in this case the average is in fact better than 50% of the books.
Actually, median, mean and mode can all be called average, which is where a lot of misleading statistics comes from. I read this in Darell Huff's excellent book "How to Lie with Statistics".
@@shambosaha9727 median, mean and mode can all be called average ONLY if the data you are looking at follows a normal distribution.
@@surfingbilly9654 Technically speaking, they can all be called average ALWAYS. They have the SAME VALUE if the distribution is Gaußian.
I used the median recently in a report and to avoid the confusion of talking about the 'average' value, and knowing that the audience would not have heard of the median, I referred to the result as the 'typical' value i.e. the typical number of days worked, rather than the average number of days worked.
I honestly thought the wheel was rigged, as the audience were turning it clockwise and matt was spinning it anti-clockwise and there was some mechanism that only worked in one direction.
What is the odds of it landing on probability?
more pertinently what are the odds of a complex clockwise/anti-clockwise fixing mechanism versus matt just re spinning till he get's green and editing the video
But to answer your question, it's 1 in 5, or for 3 probability in a row I believe it's 1 in 125 (1 in 5^3)
i thought the same thing.
and after he said the "dont believe everything you see on the internet" thing, i thought "but what if the video ISNT edited?"
3 _green_ is 1 in 125
but 3 _same_ in a row is 1 in 25
I’m a magician. Probability is my game. I was blown away, that they did several takes to make this happen :)
Matt Parker is a great math and science communicator. Thanks to Matt and The Royal Institution.
47:11 Wheel was on green, camera cuts to man about to spin, wheel is on red.
Good eye, good eye !
Ah, can also freeze frame at 26:18 to notice the peg grabbed in the wide shot, is not the peg released in the "good spin" close up.
JamieJamez
Did you watch the whole presentation?
@@nicholasn.2883 Frame-by-Frame
@@JamieJamez I assume he ment, if you watched the whole video. Because in the video itself this exact gets explained and specificly adressed.
I love the idea of maths being a progression in which you get less and less wrong. At school I got a lot wrong. Five years later I met my old maths teacher and he asked me what I was doing now. I was able to tell him that I was teaching maths!
The jenga buildings part really resonated with me... 😋
Guy called “Tom scott” Lmao
Nah fam i just had a laugh how casual that mention was
Clearly his full name is Thomas Scottland.
@@twinsunianlp7359 Thomas "red shirt" Scottland
Mildly interesting probability story. I once visited Tokyo and during a wild night out lost my mobile phone. The next day my friend received a phonecall to come and pick up my phone. Turns out, it had been picked up by someone I had gone to primary school with 15 years prior who had recognised me in the photos on my phone, had contacted back to our mutual home country to get all the relevant phone numbers and then called through to arrange a meeting spot.
The chances are pretty small and I am eternally thankful they went to the effort.
I don't know about luck. what I do know is that it has nothing to do with my comment that you are replying to. Maybe you meant to put in the main thread?
Of the 300+ video's I've watched on math and science, Matt Parker is my absolute favorite presenter. I am surprised, however, that a man of his obvious brilliant intellect would to ask, "Can everyone hear me OK?" as if anyone who couldn't hear him could possibly answer a question they haven't been able to hear!?!?! That sounds a bit like asking the audience, "Please raise your hand if you were unable to be here tonight"? LOL!
Sir you won hearts when at the very beginning you said, " that person is on phone, while I am talking. once a teacher, always a teacher'.
46:20 remembered a quote that is incredibly relevant to what he says here
"No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong"
- Albert Einstein
I remembered that from a Space Engineers loading screen, I don't look up Albert Einstein quotes in my free time fyi
45:15 Another fact that has to be considered is that the projections that the maps used to pinpoint the locations could also affect the shape. The previous researcher could have even selected the same locations on a different kind of a projection and identified another pattern. They're just random conincidents.
I had a "that's me" moment, surfing random videos on you-tube, finding myself in the background.
I wonder how many RUclips videos I'm in? It's actually scary to think there has almost certainly been a time, where someone online looked at me in the background of someone else's video (from a local vlogger or filmmaker for example).
It's not scary that someone has seen me, what's scary is that I'm still there right now, and there are many short moments of my life literally sitting in servers all over the world, accessible to almost anyone.
It only counts if you married the uploader before seeing the video. 😅
To speak to the probability stories in this video: My wife is originally from Utah, and her dad grew up in American Fork. After we moved to the Portland, Oregon area, we were in a mall where we overheard a woman talking to a store clerk about her upcoming voyage to Utah. We had just moved to Oregon (literally a few months before), and we interjected ourselves into the conversation saying that we had just moved from Utah and was curious as to where she was going. She mentioned where she was going, but she also happened to mention that she lived in American Fork for a while. My wife said, "That's where my dad's from!" She asked his name, and when my wife told her his name, she exclaimed, "I dated your dad in junior high school!"
We were BLOWN AWAY. Right then, my wife called her dad, and they talked for about twenty minutes on the phone in the most impromptu lovers' reunion I had ever experienced. It still brings a smile to my face.
Mmm... it's no longer something that happens to somebody in the world, but now we need to take into account it happening to a viewer of Mats video. That is a much lower chance.
@@renedekker9806 You have to increase the probability by a factor of how many strange coincidences you allow, as well as distance from the teller of the story. Matt's specific examples revolved around pictures shown to those about to get married. Now we're up to meeting someone who had a passing relationship with n degrees of separation. Each of these makes things exponentially more probable.
Last summer a young lady I had never met had her small puppy named "Stevie Nix" chase my young kitten named "Little Richard" up a tree. Strange coincidence? Sure, but that's not the real strange coincidence. After finally retrieving poor Little Richard, we got to talking and discovered that we had both gone to the same high school - 4500 km away. Albeit 40 years apart
That was a day to play the lottery.
@@MrSJPowell Not to mention that we have to factor in what constitutes a "weird occurence".
If there are no rules set up before hand, literally anything goes.
While it is unlikely that one specifik freak occurrence happens to one person, and it is likely that it will happen to someone at least once, it is also,. by the same logic and reasoning, impossible to go through life without experiencing at least one weird event as an individual.
You just need to look for the patterns.
Small number of people in the same location. And its easy. Only 300+million outta a few billion so what are the odds? Remember most Americans never leave the States. East coast to West coast its not even the entire continent.
When it fell on "probability" the second time I joked to myself, "what's the probability of that!?". When it happened the third time I thought, surely it's rigged, but then I remembered you spinning it at the beginning and then you spun it again. Once you revealed the truth, it put my mind at ease, "oh thank God, it's just someone on the internet lying to me.".
Parker is funny, articulate, and entertaining. The way in which he has explained these concepts and ideas is remarkable, good show.
I'll have to say that the way you brought this with comedy, metaphors and plot twist this is one of the best shows I have seen so far. Amazing work I'm a great fan or yours
I was in an 80 story building during construction that during a strong wind storm that started twisting ( not just swaying) like crazy. It was quite scary. This was before the mass damper tank was constructed on top which I’m sure was where all the maths came in 😊
I worked in a brand new office building in Florida, someone didn't do their maths right because the first time we had a big wind storm the building bent and twisted enough to make some of the windows pop out of their frames. Anyone who parked in the lot adjacent to the building (think: upper management) had huge sheets of glass falling on their cars.
i love how there are so many kids willing to learn, listening in the talk
get em young then they're gone.
Matt, I'm from Texas and it's obvious that star is where it is from gravitational lensing. On an unrelated note, I'm not sure how to convey in text when my voice clearly indicates I'm grasping at straws.
james jones it’s obvious. * tips hat *
This is because in Texas the moon is way bigger
I don't think gravitational lensing can explain the gradient background showing through...
Perhaps the Earth's shadow on the moon merely coincidentally resembles the plate's background very, very closely.
I thought it was just Texas redefining the size of the moon, like Indiana did with pi.
55:00 After getting the two probability stories, I thought the third one would be explaining how the wheel is rigged.
I am 5:00 into the video and i gotta say.. this is why Matt Parker is my fav. maths educator on this planet.
Buffer Overflows, Hydrazine, and Giant Jenga; An Introduction to Statistics by Matt Parker
And Parker Square
This makes me realize how easy it is to mess something up. Like imagine writing an entire movie franchise without having these kind of mistakes would be so hard.
I just assumed the spinner was rigged. Of course he'd go about it the Parker way--don't cheat, just repeat.
Well, James Grime did it with the 10 coin flips in a row video.
Love your avatar
it was a little suspect that it stopped on the purple before the green on the last one. that (at least in my mind) confirmed the rigging
9:55 I love how you just gloss right over that "a lot of my friends procreate" joke. Hidden gem.
I used to be a C++ software engineer. Before that I was an Ada software engineer. The Ada language has built in checks, one of which is a constraint error. If you get a constraint error, which is propagated out of the program - which goes up wires, which means different things to different bits, which... bang. I had the ESA crash report for Arian 501 pinned to my cubicle wall for decades :)
- What happens when MATT goes wrong?
- They call it a square.
11:30 "That's not a bad angle for the shuttle taking off". Except the shuttle takes off vertically.
It has to leave the atmosphere at an angle or else the friction from the atmosphere burns up the shuttle. Like how it is softer to dive into a pool than it is to do a cannon ball.
@@joeydunn7727 Agreed - what you need to achieve is velocity parallel to the Earths surface if you want to go into orbit.
As a math major during the Middle Ages (actually, the 1970s), I loved your lecture.
Also, as an amateur astronomer in the 1960s, I seem to recall an image of a crescent moon with a star coming through the dark side. We had a good laugh about that.
"Till clomb above the eastern bar
/ The hornèd Moon, with one bright star / Within the nether tip." The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
And the star in the crescent is a big Muslim icon, they've got it on the flags and everything.
I was expecting a documentary about Parker Squares.
I was looking for this comment
@@dcs_0 it's even titled "Maths Goes Wrong"
@@Roescoe That makes this quite the Parker video then, hey?
"Is it heads on both sides?"
"No"
"Is it tails on one side"
"Yes"
A Parker coin.
I thought it was Trey Parker
I found this video while aimlessly browsing (It's COVID time and I'm bored). Well, it could be a turning point in my life, or not... But either way, thank you so much for sharing your time, energy, friends, and family with the rest of us. For now, my lips are frozen in the shape of a big warm smile.
grammarist.com/spelling/math-maths/
Discuss.
Update: we've now added English language subtitles to this video!
cuh. and I thought j was the square root of -1 when all along it was i. i of all things.
Just recently I learned that English doesn't actually have real rules, which is crazy to me as a German, where there are rules for everything in language. And they were even recently changed to be more logical: GAR NICHT SCHEIẞE!
@ What you mean by 'real rules' because I've studied both English and German and they both have rules.
@@teun4767 In English, there is no central institution that defines the rules, it's all just convention.
Dicky Bannister that’s awesome, that’s why I hate script writing
P.s it stands for imaginary just Incase you didn’t realize
So 2011 is "disturbingly recent" but 2010 is "the distant past"?
2011 is as far into the past from 2019 as 1997 is to 2005
gotta draw the line somewhere
Well it depends on what it is that is recent, i guess
@@hdckighfkvhvgmk "anything" I think was what he said.
It's the "rule of 7"
most of 2011 is within 'seven point something' years ago, while 2010 isn't.
Although I will probably (pun intended) never be a huge maths enthusiast myself. I can appreciate the fun you can do with it and the important part it plays in the world we live in. Thanks for this interesting video! My younger self would've never believed I'd spend an entire hour watching a video about math in my spare time and enjoy it ;-).
This is perhaps one of the hardest things to teach: that it's okay to make mistakes.
The first solution you come to doesn't matter. What does matter is how you came to that solution, and what you do to make subsequent solutions better.
"When maths goes wrong" I'm sorry, did you mean... Parker maths?
I came to say something like that too but you said it
Parker Maths, when something is so close to being right but is still wrong.
Liam West haha
Yessss
What is parker maths
South Korea, buildings, exercising Paul Shepherd and Jenga! (relates to the bridge feedback chapter). There is a Korean show on netflix called "my Mister" where the lead plays a civil engineer who designs buildings, and it mentions a building he designed where a gym caused problems and the damping mechanism he put in to counter it.
45:43 Tom Scott mention!
Wonderful video! I really enjoyed it.
One quibble though. The Ariane 5 failure was not a math error. It was a software engineering failure. The program was designed correctly for the requirements they had for Ariane 4. The problem is that they didn't recheck it for the range of inputs that the Ariane 5 would produce. The failure would've been detected if they had simply simulated the launch. (IIRC, they did see it in some simulations but they just rebooted and ran it again. I could be wrong about this.)
They had redundant data processing units in the rocket and they assumed that if there was a crash, the other units would take over. Unfortunately, all the computers were using the same inputs and the same software, so they all simultaneously crashed.
This is a classic software engineering cautionary tale about the dangers of reusing software.
and an even greater one of taking shortcuts, and not looking into all the what ifs. cascading failures indicate an inherent overall software design fault
Computer software is mathematics.
@@andrewwigglesworth3030
No. Programming is technical writing.
It is a form of literature.
@@EtzEchad Ask a computer :-P
btw. I wrote "software."
Such a naturally talented maths communicator. Wish my math teacher was this engaging.
You must have composed that comment on an aeroplane. I can spot the point at which you crossed the Atlantic.
He does such a good job with his lectures. So much fun to watch!
45 seconds of this and I am already so happy I started!
Great Presentation - I like math because no matter how long it takes me to get to a solution, the math never gets mad or frustrated - it patiently waits for me to succeed!
I am so glad this popped up in my feed, excellent talk👍
I have 4 probability events similar to the young couple who were strangers in the same photograph as children:
1. My sister was visiting Hawaii with a girlfriend and while there, unexpectedly met the husband of another friend. She recognized him. Turns out that she had met him 40 years earlier at his house when we were all children. We were at their house to encounter buggy driving with Shettland ponies. I was 8. Why she remembered the boy and this event was because of her keen interest in the beautiful drawing of a male African lion's head on the wall of this boy's bedroom (which he had drawn). She was a budding artist at the time. Fast forward up to her trip to Hawaii and recognizing him although he was thoroughly stumped who this woman was who was describing his childhood home to great detail back in California 1966.
2. My niece was getting married in Washington state into a family of preachers. The the family tree branch this young man was on was lateral to the one that I and my siblings were familiar with, but with the same sir name and same grandmother. At the family dinner prior to the wedding day, I was seated at the patriarchal table next to the matriarch of the family, herself. We strike up conversation and she asks me where I live. (central California) She says, "Is that a fact", well do you know my dear friend Victor D.?" I reply, astonished, "why, yes I know him, in fact we play music at church together almost every week!!... How do you...?" . She replies, "we adopted him and his family when he was a child in Burma. How is he doing?"
3. My daughter, who grew up in Central California, decided to attend college out of state. Her best friend, Meg, would take my daughter home with her during breaks because of the long distance back home to California. On one occasion, Meg's uncle states, "So, I understand we are related." Intrigued, my daughter asks how they could be related.
"If your last name is _________, and your dad's name is _________, then your grandfather is Donald, his father was Walt, mother Ev.....and proceeded to name off our immediate up-line (to borrow a marketing term) all the way to the branching where their family name changed when their great grandmother married. The girls became cousins after being friends for years.
4. My most improbable event because of the ending....read on.
Just before entering high school our family moved from southern California to central Pennsylvania. I attended a boarding academy there. In early Fall of my sophomore year, a busload of us students were on a club or band trip. As luck would have it, I got to sit with several very cute girls, chatting about this and that, and well, just about everything. Suddenly all the mannerisms of one of them reminded me of a former classmate I'd had a crush on in grade school back in California, a mere 4 years earlier. I turned to her and exclaimed, "sweetie, do you know who you remind me of??!! When I opened my mouth to utter the answer, what was heard was in the voice of one of the other new girls to the school: "Theresa ________!!!" she shot out in unison to my own "Theresa________!!!" "Wait!! Where do you know Theresa from??!!" California. "Wait!!, where do YOU know her from??!!" "Montana". It really IS a smaller world then we expect.
There is a dog park at the end of the Tacoma Narrows bridges where I was taking my dog for a few weeks before I noticed a plaque dedicating the park to Tubby, a dog who was the sole victim of the first Tacoma Narrows bridge. She was too afraid and wouldn't get out of the car.
This really reinforces my theory that Matt wrote this entire book just to try to justify the Parker Square
The Parker square needs no justification. Except that it does. That is an inherent property of a Parker square. That is THE inherent property of a Parker square.
There is no such thing as a single dice. It is called a die. Don't be fooled by those who insist that you should never say die.
Times are changing - en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/dice - "Historically, dice is the plural of die, but in modern standard English dice is both the singular and the plural: throw the dice could mean a reference to either one or more than one dice."
Both are correct nowadays
People really should say "dice" for the singular form and "dices" for the plural form.
The only reason why people are uncomfortable with those forms is because those aren't the official spellings.
Wait, if dice is plural and die is singular, does that mean rice is plural and rie is singular?
@@qwertyuiopzxcfgh
Not really, most languages are just arbitrary like that.
Ideally, all words should use regular forms, since this would be much more convenient, but reality is always more complex than that.
24:41 the kid in the back with the oppai hoodie
PURE LEGEND
"Texas: Undone by a lone star!"
I lost it!
55:04 - 55:34
Matt - this is the best lesson *_ever!_*
I knew he was messing with us somehow lol! Duped me on the method though.
I wish I had you as a maths teacher! You make me wanna grab my old A-level notes and do some calculus and logarithms.
Is the second book going to be called “Humble Tau”?
"I don't want to live on the moon" seems oddly appropriate since I was just watching Umbrella Academy.
Having got married in 1990 a few years on we were discussing a particular music festival in 1983 and I had photos of my group mucking about outside our tents. She then pointed to the next row of tents - and the one actually pitched next to mine - and said "hey - that's my tent!" We didn't meet until around 1988.
I notice the 'stars visible through the moon' mistake in many popular anime shows even today, I guess the lack of basic astronomy knowledge is common even for professional artists
Lack of artistic knowledge is perhaps equally common among professional mathematician.