134. Praxeology in One Lesson w/ Conza
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024
- What is praxeology and why does it matter? In this episode, Conza, chairman of the Libertarian Party of Australia, joins us to discuss the theoretical foundations of economics. He explains why praxeology - the science of human action - provides the value-free framework needed to reason about economic questions, and how its method differs from that of physical sciences such as biology. He and Saifedean discuss how praxeology can be used to analyse topics such as minimum wage, inflation and pandemics, and why the contrasting methods used by quantitative macroeconomists are flawed. They also defend Hoppe's argumentation ethics: a proof that arguing against the Non-Aggression Principle is logically incoherent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Saifedean’s first book, The Bitcoin Standard:
saifedean.com/t...
Saifedean’s second book, The Fiat Standard:
saifedean.com/t...
Enjoyed this episode? You can take part in podcast seminars, access Saifedean’s courses and read chapters of his forthcoming books by becoming a Saifedean.com member. Find out more here:
saifedean.com/... 
Развлечения
Two kings in a podcast 👏👏👏
I'm currently doing a Master's degree in Austrian Economics, and I approve of this message.
From Which University?
@@amorfati4096 Mises Graduate School
@@Minder666 You based in Austria? Are there any international Students in same enrolment?
I like what he said about being accurate, sounds like the definition of a good friend.
Thanks guys. I appreciate the conversation
This has just got to be the best Bitcoin Standard Podcast ever. Thanks!
Love the Ron Paul poster.
1:43:43 - 1:48:10
priceless rant! :D
The Bitcoin Standard Podcast beats every fiat school or university by far in terms on IQ leveling up people.
17:34 Science etymologically means to cut. It's a discerning technique.
Need a glossary
Choppy video seems like a time compressed version of radio ads. Great signal just jarring
Appreciate the time and effort as I did not know what this was. But I had to turn off after a while as the speaker is very difficult to follow. He also needs to stop saying ‘you know’ all the time!
Appreciate the feedback. Hopefully there’s a spark of interest in the logic and science of human action at least. I am a second hand dealer in ideas. Trying to paraphrase the greats will never be as good as reading the real thing.
you guys are an embarrassment endorsing argumentation ethics as a valid argument. its fallacious, its inductive fallacy with respect to the presuppositions