@@simsimmons8884 He's literally using the same pose as Dr. Evil, wearing the same clothes, and has a shaved head. The similarities are so striking I thought that it was intentional. lol
00:09 AI's future capabilities are inspiring 02:19 Evolution of computer industry towards neural networks 05:19 AI's evolution aided by compute power and data availability 06:54 AI will transform various industries significantly. 09:52 Transition from Discovery to Engineering in Biotech 11:24 AI shaping geopolitics and defense 14:32 Innovative warfare technologies impacting geopolitical dynamics 16:06 The future of warfare shifting towards technology and economic strength 19:02 Technology's increasing political influence 20:33 AI's impact on the movie industry and automation concerns 23:22 Importance of keeping technology open and democratic 24:45 Impact of Regulation on AI Innovation 27:27 The AI Revolution at higher levels vs. Robotics Revolution happening soon 28:56 Rapid advancement in hardware capabilities for human-like robots 31:37 Investing across diverse AI approaches 32:56 Value capture uncertainty in AI industry 35:40 Importance of deep domain expertise in starting tech companies 37:03 Successful startups often come from deep understanding of problems and innovative solutions. Crafted by Merlin AI.
So…if 21 century warfare is effectively played as a videogame…why not simply do all warfare in videogames? And have abundance and peace in the physical world? Could AI help us with that?
@@petersoakell6950 This is missing the point totally 🙁 AI will NOT develop sentience or have any opinion about anything. But humans have sentience, and we COULD realize right now the total absurdity of having these wars in the first place. The insanity of building expensive drones to fight other drones, when it would be much easier to begin to organise for a peaceful and abundant society, where we could do all the killing in videogames instead.
I love the idea! It's a bit like in Troy - instead of two armies fighting, pick a champion and only they fight. Drastically reduce the suffering. Unfortunately no-none will follow the rules if they lose 😢
With the AI paradigm shift I guess people need to have a guarantee for a means of survival also without having a job, and that they have extra free time. Current intellectual and creative jobs also have boring repetitive time consuming tasks. AI is an opportunity and new way of life to continuously learn, explore and be more creative.
Three key points: - 1:20 Whether computers should be designed as we understand them today or based on the human brain. Eventually 99% computers are designed for what they are today. - 20:30 The good thing about AI is that we are rolling it out in a very democratic way, compared to the PC revolution where it started out from a million dollar main frame trickle down to what it is today. - 30:57 are those businesses (foundational model companies) a raise to monopoly and infinite profits because the best models or they actually a rise to the bottom because of the opposite of Moores law?
I think in the future movies is going to be a mix of real footage mixed with video generation from ai models. so they blend in 2 worlds at the same time.
A public cloud/GPU cluster should be available so that everyone should be able to use it and train whatever they want and everyone can have “Multiple AIs”.
@@Jack-2day He was at the heart of building Mosaic at school before Netscape, too! That one was the first graphical web browser with any significant usage (as opposed to a research project only used within a single team).
And : - Google wasn’t the first search engine - iPhone wasn’t the first smartphone - Tesla isn’t the first electric car - ChatGPT wasn’t the first LLM Being first isn’t as important as being the one who does it best , and has the biggest impact
Deterministic vs Probabilistic computers. Cush!! in the drive train. Air tires made motor sports happen. Springs and shock absorbers gave us traction. If Humanity were wiped out after a bad election - do you think AI would rise to take its place? Would they be kings and diplomats? Would there be - an Architect?
Most humans who earn high salaries are in knowledge work (i.e., doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers, managers). Very shortly, all of that work will be assisted by AI. Then soon, it will be replaced by AI. Good luck, everyone. 👈
The new "learn to code" will be "learn to x" (x being some form of physical labor), which will lead to massive competition for far fewer jobs, which will lead to far lower wages and benefits. Definitely going to be interesting.
@@tracy419 I totally agree. I also think we will see a massive, global organized labor movement. As the wages slips away, people will demand work. In history, you can see the rise of labor movements whenever work is automated.
@@haze1123 I wonder what that looks like in the end? What do you think labor will look like if people band together with what's coming? I'm not sure the things that used to happen will be how it turns out. Short term, things like better minimum wages and benefits are a good idea and these groups help make it happen. But when jobs start disappearing by the millions, I'm not sure those wages can be continued. It seems like we need some real flexibility at this point in time so that the artificially higher wages (I don't mean unjustified, just forced) of today aren't keeping costs artificially higher as things become more automated. Maybe we get some form of UBI, maybe we have the remaining jobs split into shorter shifts so that more people can continue working, maybe a combination? My only concern with people organizing to get better wages and benefits going forward is, are they also thinking about what happens when all of a sudden there are 3 people available for every job out there, and are willing to work for less so they can afford more than just the basic necessities? Sorry for the rambling. This is a topic I don't see getting enough attention, and I never see anyone discussing what happens to those in unions when the jobs start disappearing. How do they adapt to what's coming? Will they be relevant in that world? Will they adjust downward in wages to compete with others?
@@tracy419 I'm just imagining here, because no one knows... At first, there will be massive and powerful labor movements. Government will respond with high taxation and UBI. But people will not be satisfied because the human animal is designed for work. So these interventions will fail for many people. It won't be satisfactory. Some people will band together in small groups and break away into self-sufficient farming communities. They will reject technology to some extent and seek to protect their children from AI and robotics (new age Amish). Others will accept their government checks and live among the robots in abundance, spending all of their free time on various forms of incredibly immersive entertainment and drugs that extend life, regulate mood, and promote fitness.
@@haze1123 interesting thoughts, thanks. I kinda like the idea of bringing sustainability to the population centers and creating work maintaining it. So as technology improves, move most transportation including people, products and waste underground. Convert most roads and parking into food forest parks that provide food, wildlife, outdoor entertainment, etc. People who want something to do can help maintain these areas with the help of technology very part time. Along with the normal benefits that has on a population, it could help offer something to fill the empty space some people will experience without having jobs.
Russian's have used ten's of thousands of drones on Ukrainian tanks, APC's and other vehicles. Russia has also used long and medium range drones en masse, where Ukraine has not.
Marc might be intelligent, but his comment about maybe China could help the US leap frog with our collect health data, shows me to never trust or use his AI version. Even though the world leaders want all nation states to collect and utilize their information for AI healthcare, his comment struck differently. Marc lost my respect right there.
27:45 It's hard to imagine the market for robot dogs being very big. People who want dogs want living dogs and people who don't want dogs don't want any dog (living or robot).
Sheep herding, surveillance, disaster inspector, cave explorer, hiking partner, sports crew, event usher, shopping assistant, crowd controller, airport security, etc From mining to agriculture to content creation, sports. it’s hard to imagine a place that wouldn’t have robot dogs
@@omoladeodetara I don't see how any of those things you mentioned benefit from a robot dog. Sheep herding uses real dogs. Surveillance and cave explorer use flying drone. Why the F would agriculture (picking strawberries say) require a robot dog? The dog gonna pick berries with it's mouth? Shopping Assistant being a dog is useful how? People are just going to trip over it.
There should be much more investments in AI safety and much more effort put into AI safety regulations. Remember, when this goes very wrong there likely won't be a second chance for us. Very important warnings by two godfathers of AI, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, and many other leading AI technicians, about a very real, possible AI existential threat! Like by creating subgoals when AIs are enabled to act autonomously, and one of those subgoals would be to get more control. When they'll surpass us in general intelligence, which we won't necessarily notice, we won't be able to keep up with them and imagine what they're planning or strategizing. Surely these people are ultimate generative AI technical experts and truly know what they're talking about. As a layperson I choose to trust their information and warnings before anyone else.
He says a lot. But a lot of bullshit as well. 5 min in, he has already started to pouring out SV bullshit, "led the creation of self driving car..." There is no self driving car, yet.. there are only attempts to create "self driving cars". To anyone who questions me if I know who he is, yeah, I know who he is and I have personally interacted with him.
I think the thumbnail showing him as Dr. Evil is very appropriate. This man is not to be trusted nor listen to. I don't believe his intentions are for the best of humanity.
Andreeson is not an expert in anything that he is talking about. He’s a very wealthy investor whose interests are far from aligned with the rest of society. What is “good” for him is almost certainly bad for the rest of us. Show me some serious work and commitment to the problem of AI alignment, and then I’ll listen.
@@tuckerbugeater Someone tired of seeing these demons act like they own the country. What are you? Hopefully not one of their little c-u -c -k minions.
That thumbnail is very Dr.Evil
Freakin lasers
Very fitting
Now we just need a Mini Marc 😂
I was going to post just that. Lmao
Whoever picked that thumbnail deserves a raise.
I had to read the comments just to see if anyone mentioned Dr. Evil.
That is totally why I'm here.
Why are you watching if you have to say something so childish. Civility starts with all of us.
@@simsimmons8884 He's literally using the same pose as Dr. Evil, wearing the same clothes, and has a shaved head. The similarities are so striking I thought that it was intentional. lol
I made a video called Mad Scientists or Geniuses
😂
Great video, thank you for sharing, appreciate you
Man he speaks fast. I had to double check my YT playback speed lmao
When Conehead speaks I listen
Yes...he is brilliant.
Why call him names? Try bringing some civility to posts. It starts with everyone.
@@LAinLA86 i read that as "when cokehead speaks i listen" 🤗
100% i thought it was at 150% at least
First instance where i thought i needed to slow down the pace:), he speaks fast! But great content 👍
This guy is a head of his time - very sharp and makes a great point.
Wow, important conversation. Thanks for sharing! Great questions
Great content, thank you!
everyone saw Dr. Evil in the thumbnail right lol @5:16
00:09 AI's future capabilities are inspiring
02:19 Evolution of computer industry towards neural networks
05:19 AI's evolution aided by compute power and data availability
06:54 AI will transform various industries significantly.
09:52 Transition from Discovery to Engineering in Biotech
11:24 AI shaping geopolitics and defense
14:32 Innovative warfare technologies impacting geopolitical dynamics
16:06 The future of warfare shifting towards technology and economic strength
19:02 Technology's increasing political influence
20:33 AI's impact on the movie industry and automation concerns
23:22 Importance of keeping technology open and democratic
24:45 Impact of Regulation on AI Innovation
27:27 The AI Revolution at higher levels vs. Robotics Revolution happening soon
28:56 Rapid advancement in hardware capabilities for human-like robots
31:37 Investing across diverse AI approaches
32:56 Value capture uncertainty in AI industry
35:40 Importance of deep domain expertise in starting tech companies
37:03 Successful startups often come from deep understanding of problems and innovative solutions.
Crafted by Merlin AI.
05:16 i legit hope Marc saw the thumbnail and was like "Nah man PLEASE keep it. "Throw me a freakin' bone!". Love it."
“And is my Giant Laser done yet?!”
I should play this video at 1.25 instead of 1.5 cause Marc Andreesen speaks so fast
Haha, I also went down from 2x to 1.75x
I had to go down to 1.5 from 2.0
Unfortunately Ytbe doesn't have 8x. Wanted to hear him rap
Marc Andreessen is a legend, he developed Netscape the first Web Browser, he is hyper smart and a cool guy
glazing 101. he is a simple human just like you are.
@@user-xedwsgyeah, they weren't claiming he isn't human.
What a strange thing to interject.
No he didnt
So…if 21 century warfare is effectively played as a videogame…why not simply do all warfare in videogames? And have abundance and peace in the physical world? Could AI help us with that?
Was thinking along the same lines. If AI achieves sentience it may not let us have wars. )
@@petersoakell6950 This is missing the point totally 🙁 AI will NOT develop sentience or have any opinion about anything. But humans have sentience, and we COULD realize right now the total absurdity of having these wars in the first place. The insanity of building expensive drones to fight other drones, when it would be much easier to begin to organise for a peaceful and abundant society, where we could do all the killing in videogames instead.
I love the idea! It's a bit like in Troy - instead of two armies fighting, pick a champion and only they fight. Drastically reduce the suffering. Unfortunately no-none will follow the rules if they lose 😢
Video game wars make sense when you're fighting over things that are in video games
6:00 cannot agree more!
With the AI paradigm shift I guess people need to have a guarantee for a means of survival also without having a job, and that they have extra free time. Current intellectual and creative jobs also have boring repetitive time consuming tasks. AI is an opportunity and new way of life to continuously learn, explore and be more creative.
Looked at the thumbnail once and I started looking around for Minnie me.
I need to listen to this at .75 speed to give myself the opportunity to digest...
literally Dr. Evil
Three key points:
- 1:20 Whether computers should be designed as we understand them today or based on the human brain. Eventually 99% computers are designed for what they are today.
- 20:30 The good thing about AI is that we are rolling it out in a very democratic way, compared to the PC revolution where it started out from a million dollar main frame trickle down to what it is today.
- 30:57 are those businesses (foundational model companies) a raise to monopoly and infinite profits because the best models or they actually a rise to the bottom because of the opposite of Moores law?
Great...🙋♂️🤳
He’s a genius
❤
I think in the future movies is going to be a mix of real footage mixed with video generation from ai models. so they blend in 2 worlds at the same time.
A public cloud/GPU cluster should be available so that everyone should be able to use it and train whatever they want and everyone can have “Multiple AIs”.
Pitching to him would be crazy cause you’d need to talk real fast!
Chill , stop calling the legendary founder of the first Web Browser Dr Evil guys
Netscape Navigator. Loved those early days.
Wasn't the first Web Browser
@@Jack-2day He was at the heart of building Mosaic at school before Netscape, too! That one was the first graphical web browser with any significant usage (as opposed to a research project only used within a single team).
@@alchemist_one my point still stands, there is only one’ first’. Cheers
And :
- Google wasn’t the first search engine
- iPhone wasn’t the first smartphone
- Tesla isn’t the first electric car
- ChatGPT wasn’t the first LLM
Being first isn’t as important as being the one who does it best , and has the biggest impact
He’s terrified of Lina Khan.
7:36 well said
custom speed at 0.85 worked great to make this talk sound normal
I usually play these at x2 speed, no need with this guy
He is only one who speaks super fast and super clearly and in a soothing voice. I saw others try to imitate him but end up being very irritating.
ozempic marc be hitting different
Deterministic vs Probabilistic computers. Cush!! in the drive train. Air tires made motor sports happen. Springs and shock absorbers gave us traction. If Humanity were wiped out after a bad election - do you think AI would rise to take its place? Would they be kings and diplomats? Would there be - an Architect?
😊😊😊😊😊
Came here to hear about Dr Evil
Andreesen is brilliant
5D AI designs for emotion and feeling with love upgraded to compassion wisdomly full of knowledges
Thanks for sharing, but you guys should be quicker on draw. Someone else uploaded (albeit in much lower quality) this conversation many days ago.
okie dokie
This man can be the definition of superficial knowledge. The confidence with which he speaks about things he doesn't understand is amazing.
How do you know that he doesn't understand what he said?
@@hamdaniyusuf_dani No. That's not what the comment was.
@@MisterDivineAdVenture What was the comment about?
Imagine thinking Marc Andreessen doesn't know what he's talking about.
So you mean his knowledge is not superficial and the confidence with which he speaks about things amazing?
20:49 now it got dystopian
Indeed Dr. Evil.
Most humans who earn high salaries are in knowledge work (i.e., doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers, managers).
Very shortly, all of that work will be assisted by AI. Then soon, it will be replaced by AI. Good luck, everyone. 👈
The new "learn to code" will be "learn to x" (x being some form of physical labor), which will lead to massive competition for far fewer jobs, which will lead to far lower wages and benefits.
Definitely going to be interesting.
@@tracy419 I totally agree. I also think we will see a massive, global organized labor movement.
As the wages slips away, people will demand work. In history, you can see the rise of labor movements whenever work is automated.
@@haze1123 I wonder what that looks like in the end? What do you think labor will look like if people band together with what's coming?
I'm not sure the things that used to happen will be how it turns out.
Short term, things like better minimum wages and benefits are a good idea and these groups help make it happen.
But when jobs start disappearing by the millions, I'm not sure those wages can be continued.
It seems like we need some real flexibility at this point in time so that the artificially higher wages (I don't mean unjustified, just forced) of today aren't keeping costs artificially higher as things become more automated.
Maybe we get some form of UBI, maybe we have the remaining jobs split into shorter shifts so that more people can continue working, maybe a combination?
My only concern with people organizing to get better wages and benefits going forward is, are they also thinking about what happens when all of a sudden there are 3 people available for every job out there, and are willing to work for less so they can afford more than just the basic necessities?
Sorry for the rambling. This is a topic I don't see getting enough attention, and I never see anyone discussing what happens to those in unions when the jobs start disappearing. How do they adapt to what's coming? Will they be relevant in that world? Will they adjust downward in wages to compete with others?
@@tracy419 I'm just imagining here, because no one knows... At first, there will be massive and powerful labor movements. Government will respond with high taxation and UBI. But people will not be satisfied because the human animal is designed for work. So these interventions will fail for many people. It won't be satisfactory. Some people will band together in small groups and break away into self-sufficient farming communities. They will reject technology to some extent and seek to protect their children from AI and robotics (new age Amish). Others will accept their government checks and live among the robots in abundance, spending all of their free time on various forms of incredibly immersive entertainment and drugs that extend life, regulate mood, and promote fitness.
@@haze1123 interesting thoughts, thanks.
I kinda like the idea of bringing sustainability to the population centers and creating work maintaining it.
So as technology improves, move most transportation including people, products and waste underground.
Convert most roads and parking into food forest parks that provide food, wildlife, outdoor entertainment, etc.
People who want something to do can help maintain these areas with the help of technology very part time.
Along with the normal benefits that has on a population, it could help offer something to fill the empty space some people will experience without having jobs.
Russian's have used ten's of thousands of drones on Ukrainian tanks, APC's and other vehicles. Russia has also used long and medium range drones en masse, where Ukraine has not.
1 million dollars!
Marc might be intelligent, but his comment about maybe China could help the US leap frog with our collect health data, shows me to never trust or use his AI version. Even though the world leaders want all nation states to collect and utilize their information for AI healthcare, his comment struck differently. Marc lost my respect right there.
“The ozone layer”
do people realize that Russia also has a drone program and by the end if the war it will be one if the most advanced
they've been punching way above their weight. and all they needed was hundreds of billions of dollars in weapons from the u.s. taxpayer.
"Giant Laser"
“Laser”
Coneheads do exist.
27:45 It's hard to imagine the market for robot dogs being very big. People who want dogs want living dogs and people who don't want dogs don't want any dog (living or robot).
Robot dogs are just dogs without the downsides of dogs
@@quantumspark343 Robot Dogs are just vacuums that don't clean. What is the point of having one?
Sheep herding, surveillance, disaster inspector, cave explorer, hiking partner, sports crew, event usher, shopping assistant, crowd controller, airport security, etc
From mining to agriculture to content creation, sports. it’s hard to imagine a place that wouldn’t have robot dogs
@@omoladeodetara I don't see how any of those things you mentioned benefit from a robot dog. Sheep herding uses real dogs. Surveillance and cave explorer use flying drone. Why the F would agriculture (picking strawberries say) require a robot dog? The dog gonna pick berries with it's mouth? Shopping Assistant being a dog is useful how? People are just going to trip over it.
You know you know
He should share his skincare routine. 👀
If Dr. Evil and Conehead had a baby...
There should be much more investments in AI safety and much more effort put into AI safety regulations. Remember, when this goes very wrong there likely won't be a second chance for us.
Very important warnings by two godfathers of AI, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, and many other leading AI technicians, about a very real, possible AI existential threat! Like by creating subgoals when AIs are enabled to act autonomously, and one of those subgoals would be to get more control. When they'll surpass us in general intelligence, which we won't necessarily notice, we won't be able to keep up with them and imagine what they're planning or strategizing. Surely these people are ultimate generative AI technical experts and truly know what they're talking about. As a layperson I choose to trust their information and warnings before anyone else.
I only clicked this vid to say: “LASERS”
Interesting 🇨🇱🌎
did anybody ever the movie conehead?
Of course! He's a combo of Dr. Evil and Conehead!
*reads comments*
*raises eyebrow*
*places pinky to lips*
Bro said Final Cut Pro… 😂
The guy is a tech investor. Of course he is going to say big tech won't do AI well.
☺️🍓❤️
Mini-me
Government (military) will obtain AGI/ASI before all
The concept of Austin Powers 4
whatever he said was either irrelevant or wrong
Marc shouldn't talk authoritatively about military systems
Open Source means: ist free to everybody who has 100 Million to train AI and billions to buy Chips from NVIDIA
You can use pretrained models from meta.
@@WackyGameEngineer a few will decide what to think by using AI
He says a lot. But a lot of bullshit as well. 5 min in, he has already started to pouring out SV bullshit, "led the creation of self driving car..." There is no self driving car, yet.. there are only attempts to create "self driving cars". To anyone who questions me if I know who he is, yeah, I know who he is and I have personally interacted with him.
I think the thumbnail showing him as Dr. Evil is very appropriate. This man is not to be trusted nor listen to. I don't believe his intentions are for the best of humanity.
Promoting the nRNA disaster as a success , is not a good looker.
He is just regurgitating what the experts have said and done. All i see is a business man riding the wave of AI.
Andreeson is not an expert in anything that he is talking about. He’s a very wealthy investor whose interests are far from aligned with the rest of society. What is “good” for him is almost certainly bad for the rest of us. Show me some serious work and commitment to the problem of AI alignment, and then I’ll listen.
What does A.I alignment mean
Yeah! The confidence with which he speaks about things he doesn't understand is amazing.
Since being a non expert would make him often wrong name all the predictions he made that seem incorrect, assuming you yourself a well read expert.
Aligning AI with humanity is putting the cart before the horse. We need to first align humanity with humanity.
You still believe the experts?
Wasn’t he touting crypto not too long ago? What happened?
Everything's a scheme for these guys. Both the tech and video game industry need to return to more solid roots. These VC types are cancer.
@@Rockyzach88 what are you
@@tuckerbugeater Someone tired of seeing these demons act like they own the country. What are you? Hopefully not one of their little c-u -c -k minions.
Andreeseen- Horowitz still is which is why they are pouring money into politicians who will have a lax hand with crypto.
Very superficial stuff. I am really disappointed in Andreesen whom I used to admire.
Proud of MRNA tech and its utility? hmmmmmm
EggHead
dr evil. plus conehead
Rewrite rhe cell's software
cone head
So many words.. didnt understand anything