No When a map is reduced it features becomes smaller. Thus the scale should be multiplied rather by the number of times the map has been reduced. The reverse is true for enlargement. Hence a scale of 1:50000 is twice larger than a scale of 1:100000. That's the principle
Good evening Christabel Your worry is a common situation that plagues many learners. However, it's not a problem to worry When you face such a situation it is preferable to measure the linear distance of a grid square say 2cm then count the number of grid squares at the length and width and multiply by 2cm (being the distance of a grid square) then divide the value obtained by 2 or the number of times you have been asked to reduce so as to have the reduced length and width. I hope I solved your worry. Don't hesitate if you have any other worry Thanks
Sorry for the late reply Always measure the area of a grid square which most often it's 2cm or 4cm. Count the number of squares and multiple by 2 if they are 2cm each or 4 if they are 4cm each. This is because some maps are photocopied and when photocopied the scale or grid squares may be distorted
No When a map is reduced it features becomes smaller. Thus the scale should be multiplied rather by the number of times the map has been reduced. The reverse is true for enlargement. Hence a scale of 1:50000 is twice larger than a scale of 1:100000. That's the principle
Wow great! keep up so well explained more grace👏
Thanks sir it was understood and interesting you are the best 👌 👍 😀 😊
Thanks for appreciating
This is so much Understandable Sir
I Love your Work
God bless you Sir
Good bless you too as your study.
Thank you Soo much..I really understood..it's amazing how smart you are
Thanks for appreciating
Thanks so much for explaining this is going to contribute to my success
I'm glad to help
Thanks so much sir I really understood
I'm honored sir
❤thanks sir i'm now understandingooo🤧🙏
So interesting
Nice job thanks very much
You are welcome
Thank you very much very correct
Thank you very much sir, it's such a wonderful class, God bless you for more wisdom
You're welcome
Good job 👏 prof
Great
Thanks bro
Nice
Thanks for appreciating
Thanks much 🙏🏼🥰
It is well understood sir thanks
All the best
Teacher♥️
Great job
Well done
Wow that's awesome
Thanks very much
U are best
Well done sir thank you God 🙏 bless you
Amen .
Thanks a lot Sir 🙏🙏🙏
You're welcome
thanks sir
You're welcome
That was a very good lesson sir, very explicit. Thanks so much.
thanks
Thank Thanks 🙏😊
Welcome
You are the best sir 👍👍
So nice of you
interesting
Merci
Sir I am feeling you
Thanks sir i am now understanding
Nice one there...
thanks sir GOD bless you i really understand now,,,,,🤲🤲🤲❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😍
You're welcome
I'm glad to be at your service
Really helped me in my wascce👍👌, great work
Glad it helped
very thank u sir
You are welcome
Thanks so much
Thanks 🎉
Welkom sir
great video keep up the good
Thx men
Please 🙏 sir i think you did an error (please sir is it not when we increase a map that we multiply the scale by 2)?
No
When a map is reduced it features becomes smaller. Thus the scale should be multiplied rather by the number of times the map has been reduced. The reverse is true for enlargement.
Hence a scale of 1:50000 is twice larger than a scale of 1:100000. That's the principle
Thanks 🎉🎉🎉🎉 alot sir
Always welcome
Thank you sir🎉
Nor ei enter 😊
Most welcome
Thank you sir
Welcome
Thank you
Welcome!
Wow I see success already sir.
God be thy helper
Please are all the features on the original map supposed to be on the reduced map
Just the required features asked in the question
Which level??
Sir sometimes I will measure the length of the map and get like 20.4 with this how am I going to reduce it
Good evening Christabel
Your worry is a common situation that plagues many learners. However, it's not a problem to worry
When you face such a situation it is preferable to measure the linear distance of a grid square say 2cm then count the number of grid squares at the length and width and multiply by 2cm (being the distance of a grid square) then divide the value obtained by 2 or the number of times you have been asked to reduce so as to have the reduced length and width.
I hope I solved your worry. Don't hesitate if you have any other worry
Thanks
Thanku so much sir, but I have a question…what if your map is reduced to the right scale, but the grid references on the length do not fit in?
The idea is always to measure the area of the original grid square and also divide by the number of times the map has being reduced
This is great sir thank you very much 👌👌
Sir why you didn't draw everything???
What do you mean? Please be much clearer with your question
Please sir how to do when you have may be 10.5cm????
Sorry for the late reply
Always measure the area of a grid square which most often it's 2cm or 4cm.
Count the number of squares and multiple by 2 if they are 2cm each or 4 if they are 4cm each.
This is because some maps are photocopied and when photocopied the scale or grid squares may be distorted
As Geography teacher am enjoying
Thanks 🎉❤
You're welcome. Hope its served you
Good work
Thank you! Cheers!
Good job sir
Thanks
Non it IS when WE enlarge a Map that WE multiply
No
When a map is reduced it features becomes smaller. Thus the scale should be multiplied rather by the number of times the map has been reduced. The reverse is true for enlargement.
Hence a scale of 1:50000 is twice larger than a scale of 1:100000. That's the principle
Errow
thanks sir
Sir I am feeling you
Hahahahaha how are you feeling me 😂
This is great sir thank you very much 👌👌
All the best