Feynman was a genius, regardless of what he says about his IQ. Someone who can break down complex topics like that, and was brought onto work on the Manhattan project t such a young age, shows it, and also his Nobel prize of course. He was elite. But we all run our own races, and don't need to compare to others.
I went back to school for mechanical engineering at 30. I struggled for a few semesters, but once I found Feinmans technique it really changed the game. I used to just jump to trying to solve a problem without fully understanding it. The thechnique showed me how to slow down and follow the procedure. Being able to recognize similar problems helped a lot too. I used to turn 1 problem into 3 by swapping out unknowns and trying to solve the problem from all different angles. I LOVED this video. I watched the entire thing without skipping. You're enthusiasm and delivery is what sucked me in. You got a like and a subscription. I cant wait to watch more of your videos and learn about your work. Wish you the best, man.
Wow you are really an inspiration, Im 17 and I wasted year of my high school due to which im behind most of my classmates and the place where i live most of the people have this idea of now or never so it wont be wrong to say that most of them have already given up on me but tysm this comment really made me understand and see why i chose my subjects in the first place which was not to get ahead of my class or get grades but the goal was simple i chose it to study it and thats it no expectations no mess!
Great Video. I highly recommend the book „How to solve it“ by George Polya, one of the greatest mathematicians in the 20th century and a great teacher at the same time.
Absolutely excellent! I discovered this when I was in grad school and had to teach. If you teach effectively you have to organize effectively. Thank you bro!!
One trick I like for improving is in taking notes with the aim of finding ideas from the notes worth memorizing. I end up having to simplify and rethink a list of ideas I want to remember as it is more efficient to remember logically, vs. ideas I don't take the time to connect to each other.
That's a very profficient technique, but I have trouble underlining the simple ideas in my head as I get way to caught up in the broader details of it and often, I end up thinking that I may have missed some major key points that could've had my attention switch to immediatly.
@@faroukgo4988 Yeah. I sometimes have to repeat parts of a video to get down what is said. Also, I have a process where I repeatedly go over the same idea but with a different mindset each time. For taking notes from a book or web page (or video) (1st pass), I tend to start by copy-pasting into a word document the parts I found interesting. Then (2nd pass), I reread those notes and organize them into a subset of what I want to memorize or act upon, and put those in a separate document. If I think it's a great note but just not for memorizing or acting upon at this time, I bold it and move on. This last part helps me if the topic becomes more relevant to me in the future. It also helps if I decide to write a book on the topic. It is basically the first step of writing a book, researching and condensing notes. I think this should dramatically reduce the book writing problem of motivation that many writers seem to express. Then (3rd pass), for the memorization section, my current process is set up a Q&A to self-quiz. I like to focus on definitions as a start. I also try to create lists of related ideas for a question, as I can do a trick on them. The trick is to find a logical connection or create a spectrum that is a theme of that list. Reorganize the list until there is some internal logic to it, where I can then recall that logic to more easily remember the list and take much less time than brute force memorization. An example would be if I had a grocery list of milk, eggs, oranges, pears, avocados, and canned beans. One could order the list from least sweetest to sweetest. Another trick is use the method of chunking, meaning divide the list (and subdivide if necessary) until one has categories of at most 3-4 items (like how one can remember a telephone number). So, one could have categories of no sweetness, mild sweetness, and lots of sweetness, or do just lesser sweetness and greater sweetness, 2 categories instead of 3 or vice versa. The skill of categorization. So in general, I think repetition of seeing ideas but through a different lens each time is the key to deeply understanding a topic. This is just my system to be more efficient.
@@mintee8638 wow! Quite surprisingly my approach is very similar to yours but currently im facing a lot of issues with it as high schooler there is a lot you learn in physics chemistry and maths meaning you dont learn each topic deeply but rather you learn a lot of topics at least that happens in our edu system. I cant help but dive deep into every such concept but then that results in me falling behind the others...I dont know your age maybe you are older than me...can you pls advice on how to deal with this or if you are willing can we please connect through any social media because it's really the first time I've found someone who thinks about things so much like i do
@@madhavikawade8149 I am older, but I do want to help those in high school/college. As a heads up, the following stuff stuff can feel a bit random, mainly because it touches a number of tangents. I think Tiago Forte seems to have a roughly similar style if you want to look him up. One RUclips channel I like for study tips is Justin Sung. If I were to learn phyiscs, chemistry, and math again, I would look for a subject that can apply to my own life today. For each of them, understand the main concepts and not the details like how to calculate. Calculating is a useful skill, but that only needs to be in one subject. I think the problem with education is that a topic tends to lack 2 qualities: (1) enough context, and (2) motivation. For chemistry, the context and motivation for me would be in health and cooking. By context here I mean being able to do concrete things and test them out while keeping the motivation to do so. My motivation for cooking: We all eat. So, it would be nice to understand what is going on there. What makes it taste good? What makes it healthy or unhealthy? My own rule is if it's something that I do or use regularly, then why not learn about what makes it work? For physics, it is understanding everyday things I use like a car, a rainbow, electrical gadgets, or cooking. For math, I like having the ability to think logically about ideas, looking at arguments, asking how to make them sufficiently strong. I also like the idea of using tools/creativity skills to solve problems. This lacks context and motivation though. What I find that does have context and motivation and fits under math are games. There are math videos that analyze games. I like this because one valid motivation is mastery of doing something well, with skill. A bonus to games is it can be done with a small group (big groups, meaning more than 6 people, seems to have quality issues. This is a principle I've seen in business and elsewhere). Beyond this, there are some subjects schools hardly seem to teach that I wish they would. One book I am currently reading is called Everything in its Place by Dan Charnas. It's my favorite productivity book (better than Atomic Habits). What makes it work for me is it explains things in the context of being a chef. It also makes sense that this book is an effective productivity book, as the standards for a chef are crazy high (a combination of one small mistake can destroy a dish, and customers have a low tolerance for not great food), so they developed those productivity tools by necessity. For learning a subject, what I find matters is finding the best teachers/resources in explaining that subject. I use books, videos, and websites. My way of measuring this is how many notes do I take. It can get easy to get sucked into a video that I don't take notes on, and that can be ok either as a mistake to reflect and learn from or as a way to learn the topic of storytelling and business in terms of what did they do that kept me watching them. I would say don't worry about school that much as they don't do the best job. Two important skills worth developing are communication and being active and not passive in one's life (this is a good chess principle as well). For example, with your teachers, when you find a good book or resource, tell them how that motivates you and see if there's a way to be able to go more into that as part of your grade. The teacher would probably be interested in looking at something they don't typically look at. They may get some ideas that would improve their teaching. What I would say is treat them how one should treat a boss, meaning to explicitly ask them how one can make their teaching/grading life easier when doing this task that is different from the class, such as making a grading rubric for them. I would say work with them as early as possible as this gives them more flexibility on that situation. I would imagine that good teachers love a student taking initiative because it can be less boring work and more interesting work for the teacher, and the student tends to grow way more in being active. There is this idea of active learning as being better than passive learning in general. One can search John Dunlosky and 10 studying techniques that he analyzes. I refer to a table towards the end of one of his papers. The table has the letters PINQ. What I took from an analysis of those techniques is that with the content itself, the more active learning techniques do better than the more passive ones. Outside of the content, there are some passive techniques that make a big difference, such as spacing learning out and practicing to mimic the actual situation. For example, a practice test mimics the actual test. This also applies to mimicking the environment of the actual test, meaning practicing in a noisy room helps if the actual situation involves lots of noise and distractions.
@@mintee8638 Ok sir, you honestly gave me food for thought and I just don't want to miss any of your points mentioned. I definitely will research and reflect upon them and see what works best for me. You are really so kind to have typed that long and share your experiences with me, it really means a lot! Will keep you updated on this!
I have lost count of the number of videos I have watched that tried to explain the Feynman Technique, but none has come close to your level of clarity. Thanks!
Your videos are nice and you're an interesting person. Yet, I think you're a bit too involved into stereotypes like 'being successful in your career' and 'being payed a lot'. At present, as well as historically, people have not been payed based on their contributions. A hedge fund owner gets more money than the best scientists, for manipulating the market and not only not doing anything good for the world, but much bad. Not to mention a mafia boss. A great scientist asks themselves questions and looks for answers not to be successful in their career, but to satisfy their deep curiosity about the world: "We must know, we shall know!", as Hilbert said. That's how Einstein came up with his general relativity, it was a profound realization in result of long sustained deep interest, totally not concerned with him being successful scientist. For example... In my opinion, no one ever have been a great scientist because of pursuit of money, neither anyone who pursue money can become a great scientist. Otherwise yeah, I'm very interested in quantum AI and stuff. But in my opinion, the most important technology, which is on the horizon, are the brain-machine interfaces.
I've been at the local strip joint for 6 months now. I've spent a fortune, learned nothing, and was just informed I have been expelled by my University.
Great video mate, you are very articulated and you explain concepts in a clear and concise manner thanks. I can see you becoming a highly successful RUclipsr.
Samuel not being entirely sure about sensitivity and specificity is really sympathetic. I also have to write it down and infer it from a confusion matrix to not get confused all the time😁😂
I didn't understand the part where you say 190 people as "False positives"?? But they are under "Not using drugs" category, so they have to be "False negatives" right? Is this error in video or am I missing something?? Coz, let's say a drug test is conducted between 1000 people, 950 people don't use drugs means they got negative in test result and 50 people use drugs means test came back positive for them. So in these 950 people, 20% are false negatives which means those 20% people actually take drugs but in the test they came as back as "not using drugs", this is the meaning of false negative... And I understood the part of true positives, coz in 50 people 90% people do actually take drugs but the other 10% are false positives, which means those 10% people don't take drugs but they falsely came as positive in the test, so 45 people are true positives and 190 people are false negatives... In total, 235 people do take drugs. Am I right? Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
Amazing video. So informative and educative .Keep up your good spirit.Listening to you is worth it .Your concepts are very clear and no wonder your listeners have no difficulty in understanding them
Man, you humiliated me with that simple problem, where I had to actually write down the problem and understand the concepts in order to solve it. There was a time when i could do it mentally, and write down the final formula, doing it in one line. Many years of not doing probability questions has finally come back to bite me. Thank you !
1:22 I think that’s a proof that iq doesn’t measure intelligence that well, not a proof that he wasn’t super smart in the first place. He won the Putnam and a Nobel prize
Great video! Do you have any tips on how to work on the speed of logic behind problem solving? For example, it took me some time for me to grasp what the statistics in the first question even meant conceptually in the first place. Do you have any tips on improving the intuitive conceptual understanding behind certain problems?
Have a look at my video about understanding math intuitively. Also, if you wanna get better at calculating probabilities, there is no way around lots of problem solving practice in this area 🙂
I forgot the formula and didn’t understand the formula meaning when I took this class. Fortunately, I took the class in summer and the Professor didn’t teach it and didn’t require us to hand it. But looks like today I learned something about it so clearly. Thanks for giving us some good methods to study. I am thinking I have to review my calculus before I take the Econ 11 class one week later. Thanks again
Most important thing is we should understand the problem. It happened to me so many times i failed to solve some simple problems. i remember i could not solve a simple problem in probability because i was unable to understand the English sentences. Google helps us.
Great videos, I really hope you don't stop producing high quality content! Many clicks might mean that more people watch it and that some people like it better but the reason could be that it is "easier" content (to consume) rather than more meaningful content which would positively change someones life. So please keep that in mind!
@Shimmy Shai Im not him obviously, but I happen to agree with his statement. On the other hand, I think that instantly making a connection between the utility and importance of those two things in your own life and judging other people is a mistake. In general, I think judging other people on (in the end) moral grounds is illogical. Rationally, you might know (or statistically be able to assume) that you are better at math than the jock or better at getting girls than the nerd, but if you look down on other people for their perceived inferiority, you let your emotions and ego get in the way of your actions, making you act more irrationally and less in your long term self interest by underestimating them or disregarding useful points they bring up. They may be worse in some things than you, but never let that get to your head. As for the individual payoff, I study math, so fitness is a vanity project that takes far less of my time compared to my studies. A model or athlete might view studying physics the same. Something interesting on the side, but not the center of his life. Also, both education and fitness have large front up payoffs that make investing into either at least a little very worthwhile. Having a basic college degree from any university is gonna improve your income vastly compared to a highschool dropout. Doing cardio 3 times a week is a huge health improvement compared to not working out at all. So even taking those and stopping after returns start to diminish is pretty logical for either.
@Shimmy Shai Well, I dont agree with your moralizing either. I do not need to accept or praise diversity either. It exists and any moral judgement I make is pointless, because it wastes time I could spend on other things. I believe that morality in general, and absolute moral axioms in particular, are useuless and effectively hinder decision making. So, I make no judgement, because I dont have to. Judging doesnt help me, it doesnt relate to my own life. Abscense of judgement does not mean acceptance, it means tolerance for lack of better alternatives. If, at no cost on my own, I could make all ugly and out of shape people disappear, I probably would. But I simply dont care enough about other people to waste time on judgement, that even without the time cost, would still negatively affect my decision making. As for working out, health benefits were my first argument, because they are universally useful. That was my argument about diminishing returns, doing some physical activity always benefits you because of your health. Since working out beyond that health impact mostly just influences your looks, its your call to make if those smaller aesthetic returns are still worth investing more. For me, they are. Im vain, I want to look good, lol. As for bodybuilding, sure, after a certain point, like everything, rising cost outweigh rising profits and its logical to stop. And some people dont, but they are the ones that pay the price anyway. As an additional point, even beyond health concerns, after a certain amount of gains, your body overblows the proportions that are on average seen as aesthetic. Thats why few people actually find (hardcore) bodybuilders attractive.
@Shimmy Shai I try to be as clear, logical and consistent as possible myself, because in the end, not being those things makes you choose wrong. And whats life but a game of resources and choice optimization? So I hope I was able to communicate my points well.
As a gold medal winner at the International Mathematical Olympiad of this year, I guess I'm experienced at this field. The Feynman method is basically a combination of two methods: Analysing the question and analyse your weaknesses. Analysing the question by writing it down and possibly restating the question is required when there is some useless information, which is even the case for some Mathematics questions. Remember that the IMO fits on a single piece of paper, using both sides for both days, which is DEFINITELY not the case for the Physics Olympiad. You simply can't use Mathematics on words. There is also the known Psychological effect, that we assume things are more important when we wrote them down. The other part is more important, because it is required to improve your skills. In Mathematics, I once in a while come back at a group of connected theorems, and try to find the easiest way to prove them, as a challenge. Thinking about a subject in every way possible is the best method to make you good at something. Thinking and rethinking makes sure you become faster at those steps. This is essential when you are young. Another important part, which is not part of Feynman's method is practise. Do it. It's like sleeping: extremely important, but everybody hates it, because it feels useless (I am typing this at 0:32 AM, tomorrow university 😅)
@@thetenrings There aren't any specific books you would want to read. The most important part when training for any Olympiad is being able to quickly and consistently solve the relatively simple problems, make sure the problems in the book aren't too hard.
@@SamuelBoschMIT Thank you! I was wondering which field to dive deep into for research, such that in case if I'm forced to do a job in the same field later on, atleast, the job should require me to keep learning throughout my career as opposed to reaching a ceiling. Which field do you think would offer this kind of versatility?
You're telling me one of the greatest physicists of all time had an IQ less than mine?!?! (133 according to Mensa. Not sure how accurate that one is. IQ is overrated anyway but still.) I was fired from a fast food job when I was 17 cause I was terrible lol. There is no way.
I know this approach is attributed to Feynman, but I don’t think he ever described it - at least not in text. I think the spread of this attribution to Feynman is because ppl don’t fact check stuff do a reasonable degree but see something somewhere and retell it. Do you know of any place where Feynman described this approach?
@@1sor Sure. But to my knowledge Feynman never formulated this 'Feynman approach' that is attributed to him. Your post does not address that. Btw, I'm a big fan of Feynman, just not a fan of misattribution and believe that we should not spread misinformation.
everyone should note that IQ doesn't measure overall intelligence, it is just a temporary score on one type of puzzle skill. if you practice the test a few times you can go from 70 to 130 in a week, with an official proctor, because it is not measuring anything static or biological you'll find people with advanced degrees and actual publications/award's don't ever care about "iq scores", since they know it is meaningless in academics. anyone who is neurotypical and motivated, and has necessary resources, will do well in their studies. don't let poor instruction from the past make you think certain subjects are beyond you i suggest people unsure about their intelligence to study philosophy, since it will teach basic propositional logic and epistemology, which will aid in all aspects of your learning
I think this was Feynman’s way of mocking the IQ score system. It’s completely meaningless, and I’ve never met anyone at Harvard or MIT (a place where you would expect the smartest people on this planet) who ever cared about their IQ
Its a bit contradicting that Feynman had an IQ of 124 (slightly above the standdard deviation of IQ measurements from the average) but is being used as an example of extreme superior problemsolving (also often being mentioned by Stephan Wolfram), which is supposed to be the exact statement of the IQ Test
I agree. It could be that Feynman’s IQ was actually higher. Or it could also be an indication that the way we measure IQs is not accurate and meaningful at all
@@sylwek1177 actually I think a lot of us can.. obviously it doesn’t happen overnight, but with active practice and diligence who knows what strategies people can discover for themselves.. I myself have become a lot smarter over the past 1.5 years I understand concepts really fast and am able to solve novel problems within that topic, minutes after learning it. I’m no genius, and I know that for sure becuase 1.5 years ago, I didn’t even understand basic Trigonometry… I rejected anything that had to do with learning and using my brain for my whole life… I deprived myself from intellect until i found multiple sparks that led me to craving it. Since then I’ve come across hundreds of problems, with school, and life… solving them became my priority, I would try my best without help, I would use my brain till it hurt.. I would take breaks, and come back and re approach the problems.. succeeding in some and failing in others. Ultimately I have figured out patterns overtime and am the most efficient I have ever been. Just for more perspective of how one can get drastically smarter I’m an 2nd year engineering student with a 4.0 gpa who got a 1100 on the SAT
@@william_SMMA lol bro, my whole point was that I’m dumb and got as low as a 1100, but have gotten smarter over time and now maintain a 4.0 gpa in college (I know grades don’t necessarily equate to intelligence but I don’t cheat, or rely too much on the internet I use my head
@@SamuelBoschMIT Lex frequently makes a fool of himself by engaging in long discussions about things he doesn't understand. You seem to have a similar problem. Proudly mentioning that you wrote a paper on quantum AI is like boasting that you wrote a paper on traffic management for flying carpets.
@@1sor If you are talking about me then, no. A fight would imply that either side has a chance of winning. Unfortunately, pseudo-scientific arguments and intuitive reasoning aren't much of a match for boilerplate evidence.
You are an IPHO Medalist?? In many of your videos you have portrayed that you are not that good. That's really good to know and no wonder why you got into MIT. Also your way of speaking is very cyrstal clear.
I did win 3 IPhO medals actually, but got rejected for my undergrads by MIT :) Have a look at my "life principles for success" video, and my "How to get into MIT as an international" videos for more details
@@M9a3 The admission criteria are sometimes somewhat arbitrary. I know people with just 1 medal (not that it makes a big difference) who got admitted. There are so many factors that decide if you get in. Some of them rational, some of them quite random :)
Hi I have a video idea Could you make a video about how to write a research paper (with how to find a topic) as you have a lot of experience with that It would be really helpful for high school students and I think that this is a topic that would interest a lot of people, it is kinda off topic from the whole channel but it would help Here in Croatia, as you probably know, no one does this so it is really hard to write a research paper with no experience and no one to ask for help.
thank you for mentioning an example!! it helped so much! I usually struggle to understand a concept without seeing the application of it, so thank you!!
WOW Klasse Content . Bin gerade am Gymnasium und habe dich durch Niklas Steenfat kennengelernt . Das ist Content der Generationen motiviert an sich zu arbeiten und die beste Version von sich selber zu werden . Mein Abo ist aufjedenfall gesichert❤
Hey dude I gotta ask I know I could solve difficult problems easily but easy things are really hard how to solve it. Joseph: You are gonna say "You have to have the same concentration you have during solving difficult probelms" isn't it Sam: You have to have the same concentration you have during solving difficult probelms oh wait oh no Joseph gotcha
Hi glad have found this video. I was wondering what skills are required to solve problems in math counts and Olympiad? Can these skills be broken down and learned individually? Also how can somebody know that learning is happening? Thanks.
can we do an average of the error ( of the specifity and the sensitivityty) so 0,10 and 0.20, the average is an 0.15 probability of error. And we can do 0.15 * 0.95 (the population who don't consume drugs), and if it's superior at 5% it's mean that there is more people who will know an error in their test than the people who actually consume drugs. Cause if you are tested negative and you are really positive it's as bad than if you are tested positif but you are really negative
Hey Samuel, I watched this video ruclips.net/video/BW5yXCTu0hM/видео.htmlsi=OpJRwltiTVJC1i1O on your channel yesterday, and i know my passion is in physics,math and marathons. Can you recommend some problem books for the International IPho?
@12:08 you said “that means that only four out of five of the tests are actually correct “ shouldn’t it have been “ are not correct” as the probability is around 20% I.e 1 out of 5 is correct and 4 out of 5 are incorrect as the incorrect probability is 80%. Can someone please explain if I am getting something wrong? at the start of the problem he said closer to 1 is good but 4/5 is 80% and is close to 1.
Its nice video on solving real life drug test problem with Bayes theorem, your word "only four out of the test are actually correct a bit confusing" at 12:07. Do you mean actually only one? Thanks anyway
Interesting question. Well, I am a capitalist myself, given that I own a company 🙂 But I prefer not to go into political discussions on my RUclips channel, and stay rather neutral !
What was that anki sponsorship lol. Looks like this guy is selling out already. Content is fine but the constant push to like, subscribe and watch his other videos irritated me
Steve Hsu says about Feynman's iq: Feynman was universally regarded as one of the fastest-thinking and most creative theorists in his generation. Yet, it has been reported-including by Feynman himself-that he only obtained a score of 125 on a school IQ test. I suspect that this test emphasized verbal, as opposed to mathematical, ability. Feynman received the highest score in the country by a large margin on the notoriously difficult Putnam mathematics competition exam, although he joined the MIT team on short notice and did not prepare for the test. He also reportedly had the highest scores on record on the math/physics graduate admission exams at Princeton. It seems quite possible to me that Feynman's cognitive abilities might have been a bit lopsided - his vocabulary and verbal ability were well above average, but perhaps not as great as his mathematical abilities. I recall looking at excerpts from a notebook Feynman kept while an undergraduate. While the notes covered very advanced topics for an undergraduate - including general relativity and the Dirac equation - it also contained a number of misspellings and grammatical errors. I doubt Feynman cared very much about such things.
I would put it this way: If I were to compete with Feynman on verbal tasks, I would probably still lose but the difference would be measurable. However, if I tried the same on mathematical tasks, you probably could guess how poorly I woul do. Not saying problem solving strategies are not a huge advantage, I love your videos. But we should be realistic - no one with an iq of 124/125 can become the next Feynman here. And btw Samuel, do you know your iq? I think 150+ is reasonable, isnt it?
unsure. IQ tests aren’t exactly accurate so even if it did say 125 on a test (doubt he would completely make up a number) it doesn’t really mean that much
@@SamuelBoschMIT there's a lot of critique or back and forth on his iq debate over the years. Thankfully, Carol Dweck and her team fortunately have some great news for people who worry about IQ.
Hey, im curious is there some trick/method in math with as huge impact as memory palace for improving memory? Ive heard of abakus and some japanesse verion of this tool which basically changes numbers to images and enables people to do huge mental calculations. I would be so grateful if you could recommend some starting resources :) thanks for great content :)
Not to say that your advice is bad at all, of course it's very good, but when you explained what sensitive and specific means, i immediately knew that the answer to the problem was no, because i remember seeing questions like this, and when the false positive rate (in this case 20%) is much higher than the percent of sample size (in this case 5%), you will definitely get a lot more false positives than true positives without needing to do any math, taking a few extra seconds i can see (95* 20%) = 19% of population will be false positives, and true positives, even with 100% sensitive would be 5%, and another second would show (90% * 5) = 4.5% true positive
The long-term idea is getting to the point where you can intuitively solve problems like this without having to explicitly solve it. So this is great 😊
@@SamuelBoschMIT yea no, absolutely this advice will be applicable elsewhere for me, my comment was purely that this example didnt work out for my personal viewing experience! i absolutely understand the message though
Also,I totally find myself on the wavelength of the students who are all about understanding STEM and later on due to not remembering have to look up the textbook or the notes again.I understand all the concepts being taught in class and it's all well then,but since I don't write the solution down, I'm not able to remember them clearly. I totally have been overlooking the part of writing and how crucial it is.Thank you.
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
Check out my new video about math skills you ACTUALLY need in life 🙂 ruclips.net/video/A5CMAcyI42o/видео.html
RUclips/A5c.CMcyl42o
Feynman was a genius, regardless of what he says about his IQ. Someone who can break down complex topics like that, and was brought onto work on the Manhattan project t such a young age, shows it, and also his Nobel prize of course. He was elite. But we all run our own races, and don't need to compare to others.
Exactly, his intuitions are marvelous
Who said IQ tests measure intelligence in the first place?
His technique changed humanity
Idolising someone is the first step towards not even trying to make some progress to reach the same level of his...
@@alphamf0 why?
I went back to school for mechanical engineering at 30. I struggled for a few semesters, but once I found Feinmans technique it really changed the game. I used to just jump to trying to solve a problem without fully understanding it. The thechnique showed me how to slow down and follow the procedure. Being able to recognize similar problems helped a lot too. I used to turn 1 problem into 3 by swapping out unknowns and trying to solve the problem from all different angles.
I LOVED this video. I watched the entire thing without skipping. You're enthusiasm and delivery is what sucked me in. You got a like and a subscription. I cant wait to watch more of your videos and learn about your work. Wish you the best, man.
That's inspirational mate!
I needed this hopium
Thank you, Joseph! Really brave of you to go back to school, and I am sure it will pay off 🙂
Wow you are really an inspiration, Im 17 and I wasted year of my high school due to which im behind most of my classmates and the place where i live most of the people have this idea of now or never so it wont be wrong to say that most of them have already given up on me but tysm this comment really made me understand and see why i chose my subjects in the first place which was not to get ahead of my class or get grades but the goal was simple i chose it to study it and thats it no expectations no mess!
Great Video. I highly recommend the book „How to solve it“ by George Polya, one of the greatest mathematicians in the 20th century and a great teacher at the same time.
Thanks for the recommendation Luca 🙂
Absolutely excellent! I discovered this when I was in grad school and had to teach. If you teach effectively you have to organize effectively. Thank you bro!!
Thank you John! 🙂
study physics
One trick I like for improving is in taking notes with the aim of finding ideas from the notes worth memorizing. I end up having to simplify and rethink a list of ideas I want to remember as it is more efficient to remember logically, vs. ideas I don't take the time to connect to each other.
That's a very profficient technique, but I have trouble underlining the simple ideas in my head as I get way to caught up in the broader details of it and often, I end up thinking that I may have missed some major key points that could've had my attention switch to immediatly.
@@faroukgo4988 Yeah. I sometimes have to repeat parts of a video to get down what is said. Also, I have a process where I repeatedly go over the same idea but with a different mindset each time.
For taking notes from a book or web page (or video) (1st pass), I tend to start by copy-pasting into a word document the parts I found interesting.
Then (2nd pass), I reread those notes and organize them into a subset of what I want to memorize or act upon, and put those in a separate document. If I think it's a great note but just not for memorizing or acting upon at this time, I bold it and move on. This last part helps me if the topic becomes more relevant to me in the future. It also helps if I decide to write a book on the topic. It is basically the first step of writing a book, researching and condensing notes. I think this should dramatically reduce the book writing problem of motivation that many writers seem to express.
Then (3rd pass), for the memorization section, my current process is set up a Q&A to self-quiz. I like to focus on definitions as a start. I also try to create lists of related ideas for a question, as I can do a trick on them. The trick is to find a logical connection or create a spectrum that is a theme of that list. Reorganize the list until there is some internal logic to it, where I can then recall that logic to more easily remember the list and take much less time than brute force memorization.
An example would be if I had a grocery list of milk, eggs, oranges, pears, avocados, and canned beans. One could order the list from least sweetest to sweetest. Another trick is use the method of chunking, meaning divide the list (and subdivide if necessary) until one has categories of at most 3-4 items (like how one can remember a telephone number). So, one could have categories of no sweetness, mild sweetness, and lots of sweetness, or do just lesser sweetness and greater sweetness, 2 categories instead of 3 or vice versa. The skill of categorization.
So in general, I think repetition of seeing ideas but through a different lens each time is the key to deeply understanding a topic. This is just my system to be more efficient.
@@mintee8638 wow! Quite surprisingly my approach is very similar to yours but currently im facing a lot of issues with it as high schooler there is a lot you learn in physics chemistry and maths meaning you dont learn each topic deeply but rather you learn a lot of topics at least that happens in our edu system. I cant help but dive deep into every such concept but then that results in me falling behind the others...I dont know your age maybe you are older than me...can you pls advice on how to deal with this or if you are willing can we please connect through any social media because it's really the first time I've found someone who thinks about things so much like i do
@@madhavikawade8149 I am older, but I do want to help those in high school/college.
As a heads up, the following stuff stuff can feel a bit random, mainly because it touches a number of tangents.
I think Tiago Forte seems to have a roughly similar style if you want to look him up. One RUclips channel I like for study tips is Justin Sung.
If I were to learn phyiscs, chemistry, and math again, I would look for a subject that can apply to my own life today. For each of them, understand the main concepts and not the details like how to calculate. Calculating is a useful skill, but that only needs to be in one subject.
I think the problem with education is that a topic tends to lack 2 qualities: (1) enough context, and (2) motivation.
For chemistry, the context and motivation for me would be in health and cooking. By context here I mean being able to do concrete things and test them out while keeping the motivation to do so.
My motivation for cooking: We all eat. So, it would be nice to understand what is going on there. What makes it taste good? What makes it healthy or unhealthy?
My own rule is if it's something that I do or use regularly, then why not learn about what makes it work?
For physics, it is understanding everyday things I use like a car, a rainbow, electrical gadgets, or cooking.
For math, I like having the ability to think logically about ideas, looking at arguments, asking how to make them sufficiently strong. I also like the idea of using tools/creativity skills to solve problems. This lacks context and motivation though.
What I find that does have context and motivation and fits under math are games. There are math videos that analyze games. I like this because one valid motivation is mastery of doing something well, with skill. A bonus to games is it can be done with a small group (big groups, meaning more than 6 people, seems to have quality issues. This is a principle I've seen in business and elsewhere).
Beyond this, there are some subjects schools hardly seem to teach that I wish they would. One book I am currently reading is called Everything in its Place by Dan Charnas. It's my favorite productivity book (better than Atomic Habits). What makes it work for me is it explains things in the context of being a chef. It also makes sense that this book is an effective productivity book, as the standards for a chef are crazy high (a combination of one small mistake can destroy a dish, and customers have a low tolerance for not great food), so they developed those productivity tools by necessity.
For learning a subject, what I find matters is finding the best teachers/resources in explaining that subject. I use books, videos, and websites. My way of measuring this is how many notes do I take.
It can get easy to get sucked into a video that I don't take notes on, and that can be ok either as a mistake to reflect and learn from or as a way to learn the topic of storytelling and business in terms of what did they do that kept me watching them.
I would say don't worry about school that much as they don't do the best job. Two important skills worth developing are communication and being active and not passive in one's life (this is a good chess principle as well). For example, with your teachers, when you find a good book or resource, tell them how that motivates you and see if there's a way to be able to go more into that as part of your grade.
The teacher would probably be interested in looking at something they don't typically look at. They may get some ideas that would improve their teaching. What I would say is treat them how one should treat a boss, meaning to explicitly ask them how one can make their teaching/grading life easier when doing this task that is different from the class, such as making a grading rubric for them. I would say work with them as early as possible as this gives them more flexibility on that situation.
I would imagine that good teachers love a student taking initiative because it can be less boring work and more interesting work for the teacher, and the student tends to grow way more in being active. There is this idea of active learning as being better than passive learning in general.
One can search John Dunlosky and 10 studying techniques that he analyzes. I refer to a table towards the end of one of his papers. The table has the letters PINQ. What I took from an analysis of those techniques is that with the content itself, the more active learning techniques do better than the more passive ones. Outside of the content, there are some passive techniques that make a big difference, such as spacing learning out and practicing to mimic the actual situation. For example, a practice test mimics the actual test. This also applies to mimicking the environment of the actual test, meaning practicing in a noisy room helps if the actual situation involves lots of noise and distractions.
@@mintee8638 Ok sir, you honestly gave me food for thought and I just don't want to miss any of your points mentioned. I definitely will research and reflect upon them and see what works best for me. You are really so kind to have typed that long and share your experiences with me, it really means a lot! Will keep you updated on this!
I have lost count of the number of videos I have watched that tried to explain the Feynman Technique, but none has come close to your level of clarity. Thanks!
You're very welcome 🙂
Your videos are nice and you're an interesting person. Yet, I think you're a bit too involved into stereotypes like 'being successful in your career' and 'being payed a lot'. At present, as well as historically, people have not been payed based on their contributions. A hedge fund owner gets more money than the best scientists, for manipulating the market and not only not doing anything good for the world, but much bad. Not to mention a mafia boss. A great scientist asks themselves questions and looks for answers not to be successful in their career, but to satisfy their deep curiosity about the world: "We must know, we shall know!", as Hilbert said. That's how Einstein came up with his general relativity, it was a profound realization in result of long sustained deep interest, totally not concerned with him being successful scientist. For example... In my opinion, no one ever have been a great scientist because of pursuit of money, neither anyone who pursue money can become a great scientist. Otherwise yeah, I'm very interested in quantum AI and stuff. But in my opinion, the most important technology, which is on the horizon, are the brain-machine interfaces.
I've been at the local strip joint for 6 months now. I've spent a fortune, learned nothing, and was just informed I have been expelled by my University.
Great video mate, you are very articulated and you explain concepts in a clear and concise manner thanks. I can see you becoming a highly successful RUclipsr.
Thank you 😊
Hello Samuel, still expecting a reply about Physics Olympiad 2014
Samuel not being entirely sure about sensitivity and specificity is really sympathetic. I also have to write it down and infer it from a confusion matrix to not get confused all the time😁😂
I get them confused all the times too 😂
I didn't understand the part where you say 190 people as "False positives"??
But they are under "Not using drugs" category, so they have to be "False negatives" right? Is this error in video or am I missing something??
Coz, let's say a drug test is conducted between 1000 people, 950 people don't use drugs means they got negative in test result and 50 people use drugs means test came back positive for them.
So in these 950 people, 20% are false negatives which means those 20% people actually take drugs but in the test they came as back as "not using drugs", this is the meaning of false negative...
And I understood the part of true positives, coz in 50 people 90% people do actually take drugs but the other 10% are false positives, which means those 10% people don't take drugs but they falsely came as positive in the test, so 45 people are true positives and 190 people are false negatives...
In total, 235 people do take drugs.
Am I right? Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
Amazing video. So informative and educative .Keep up your good spirit.Listening to you is worth it .Your concepts are very clear and no wonder your listeners have no difficulty in understanding them
Thank you Isabel - I appreciate your comment 😊
Awesome video man, your channel will grow massively if you keep up with this level of quality.
Thank you 🙂 That's the plan! 💪
Great vid
By the way. Did someone say you look like young Gordon Ramsay?
Haahahha I’ll take that as a compliment 😂
Man, you humiliated me with that simple problem, where I had to actually write down the problem and understand the concepts in order to solve it. There was a time when i could do it mentally, and write down the final formula, doing it in one line. Many years of not doing probability questions has finally come back to bite me. Thank you !
Hahhahhahah it's the same for me 😂 A few years ago, i would have done that in my head
study physics
1:22 I think that’s a proof that iq doesn’t measure intelligence that well, not a proof that he wasn’t super smart in the first place. He won the Putnam and a Nobel prize
This may be true. But it may also be true that he just made up the number, or something like that, and that his IQ is a lot higher
@@SamuelBoschMIT you are right, or maybe he didn’t take it seriously or it was not a good iq test, but anyway good video
study physics
Great video! Do you have any tips on how to work on the speed of logic behind problem solving? For example, it took me some time for me to grasp what the statistics in the first question even meant conceptually in the first place. Do you have any tips on improving the intuitive conceptual understanding behind certain problems?
Have a look at my video about understanding math intuitively. Also, if you wanna get better at calculating probabilities, there is no way around lots of problem solving practice in this area 🙂
study physics
No
Home country Croatia 🇭🇷. .?
I thought you were German 🇩🇪? 😂
I grew up in Croatia, and only lived in Germany as a baby 🙂
@@SamuelBoschMIT perfect. Now it makes sense. 😀
Factory workers earn more when they do a better job? Billionaires got to where they are because of problem solving skills? Get a grip 💀
nat
atbot GPT-3 [:|] "... thank you " [BEEP]
I forgot the formula and didn’t understand the formula meaning when I took this class. Fortunately, I took the class in summer and the Professor didn’t teach it and didn’t require us to hand it. But looks like today I learned something about it so clearly. Thanks for giving us some good methods to study. I am thinking I have to review my calculus before I take the Econ 11 class one week later. Thanks again
Most important thing is we should understand the problem. It happened to me so many times i failed to solve some simple problems. i remember i could not solve a simple problem in probability because i was unable to understand the English sentences. Google helps us.
Great videos, I really hope you don't stop producing high quality content! Many clicks might mean that more people watch it and that some people like it better but the reason could be that it is "easier" content (to consume) rather than more meaningful content which would positively change someones life. So please keep that in mind!
ik you said that a couple of times but the temptation is huge :)
study physics
I will do my best to keep producing high quality content 🙂
I'm so glad I found your channel! You're buff and highly educated, this is exactly what I aspire to be!
hahahahah that's the way to go dude 💪💪💪😁
@@SamuelBoschMIT please make more videos talking about your diet/ workout routine!
@Shimmy Shai Im not him obviously, but I happen to agree with his statement.
On the other hand, I think that instantly making a connection between the utility and importance of those two things in your own life and judging other people is a mistake. In general, I think judging other people on (in the end) moral grounds is illogical. Rationally, you might know (or statistically be able to assume) that you are better at math than the jock or better at getting girls than the nerd, but if you look down on other people for their perceived inferiority, you let your emotions and ego get in the way of your actions, making you act more irrationally and less in your long term self interest by underestimating them or disregarding useful points they bring up. They may be worse in some things than you, but never let that get to your head.
As for the individual payoff, I study math, so fitness is a vanity project that takes far less of my time compared to my studies. A model or athlete might view studying physics the same. Something interesting on the side, but not the center of his life.
Also, both education and fitness have large front up payoffs that make investing into either at least a little very worthwhile. Having a basic college degree from any university is gonna improve your income vastly compared to a highschool dropout. Doing cardio 3 times a week is a huge health improvement compared to not working out at all. So even taking those and stopping after returns start to diminish is pretty logical for either.
@Shimmy Shai Well, I dont agree with your moralizing either. I do not need to accept or praise diversity either. It exists and any moral judgement I make is pointless, because it wastes time I could spend on other things. I believe that morality in general, and absolute moral axioms in particular, are useuless and effectively hinder decision making. So, I make no judgement, because I dont have to. Judging doesnt help me, it doesnt relate to my own life. Abscense of judgement does not mean acceptance, it means tolerance for lack of better alternatives. If, at no cost on my own, I could make all ugly and out of shape people disappear, I probably would. But I simply dont care enough about other people to waste time on judgement, that even without the time cost, would still negatively affect my decision making.
As for working out, health benefits were my first argument, because they are universally useful. That was my argument about diminishing returns, doing some physical activity always benefits you because of your health. Since working out beyond that health impact mostly just influences your looks, its your call to make if those smaller aesthetic returns are still worth investing more. For me, they are. Im vain, I want to look good, lol.
As for bodybuilding, sure, after a certain point, like everything, rising cost outweigh rising profits and its logical to stop. And some people dont, but they are the ones that pay the price anyway. As an additional point, even beyond health concerns, after a certain amount of gains, your body overblows the proportions that are on average seen as aesthetic. Thats why few people actually find (hardcore) bodybuilders attractive.
@Shimmy Shai I try to be as clear, logical and consistent as possible myself, because in the end, not being those things makes you choose wrong. And whats life but a game of resources and choice optimization? So I hope I was able to communicate my points well.
I completely disagree with your point on IQ, he was a genius by the Definition of IQ where the normal range is between 85 to 115.
Oh my god you dumbo😂
I'm beyond thankful to you for all the content on your channel. Mr.Samuel,you have my gratitude.
You’re very welcome 😉
how developing problem solving skills from where to apply ,if there is any site
Have a look at my video on understanding math intuitively. There I give a whole bunch of references :)
As a gold medal winner at the International Mathematical Olympiad of this year, I guess I'm experienced at this field.
The Feynman method is basically a combination of two methods: Analysing the question and analyse your weaknesses.
Analysing the question by writing it down and possibly restating the question is required when there is some useless information, which is even the case for some Mathematics questions. Remember that the IMO fits on a single piece of paper, using both sides for both days, which is DEFINITELY not the case for the Physics Olympiad.
You simply can't use Mathematics on words. There is also the known Psychological effect, that we assume things are more important when we wrote them down.
The other part is more important, because it is required to improve your skills.
In Mathematics, I once in a while come back at a group of connected theorems, and try to find the easiest way to prove them, as a challenge. Thinking about a subject in every way possible is the best method to make you good at something.
Thinking and rethinking makes sure you become faster at those steps. This is essential when you are young.
Another important part, which is not part of Feynman's method is practise. Do it. It's like sleeping: extremely important, but everybody hates it, because it feels useless (I am typing this at 0:32 AM, tomorrow university 😅)
Hey man i am a beginner and i cant even do my nationals problem bro can u help please
Wow a gold imo winner in the comments, I cant even make jmo 💀
Is there any books I should read (textbooks) or any sources of problems except the past papers for IMO?
@@thetenrings There aren't any specific books you would want to read.
The most important part when training for any Olympiad is being able to quickly and consistently solve the relatively simple problems, make sure the problems in the book aren't too hard.
Hi my role model! Are you interested in the field of Cyber Security? What are your two cents on research related to Cyber Security?
Thank you 😊
I’m not super knowledgeable about cyber security, as I never worked in the field. But I’m sure it’s super interesting!
@@SamuelBoschMIT Thank you! I was wondering which field to dive deep into for research, such that in case if I'm forced to do a job in the same field later on, atleast, the job should require me to keep learning throughout my career as opposed to reaching a ceiling. Which field do you think would offer this kind of versatility?
I wonder if Feynman was inspired or read George Polya’s book on heuristics “How to Solve It”? Very similar methodology for problem solving.
Who knows! Very possible :)
You're telling me one of the greatest physicists of all time had an IQ less than mine?!?! (133 according to Mensa. Not sure how accurate that one is. IQ is overrated anyway but still.) I was fired from a fast food job when I was 17 cause I was terrible lol. There is no way.
What do you mean by terrible?
@11:40 I think y made a mistake in ur calc. It’s 50x0.8= 40 True Positive. Right? Not 50x0.9. Right?
Great video. Very interesting and helpful. Thank you so much Samuel and please keep up the great work 😉
Thank you Ahmed 😊
study physics
I was familiar with the technique, but it was still a useful video.
Hello Samuel!
Congrats for 20k subs.
please make detailed videos on fitness.
Thank you 🙂 And check out my last video before this one, which is about fitness 💪
I think, by saying what he said about his IQ he mocked the IQ measuring system.
I think so too! 😊
*Another masterpiece 🌟✨*
Thank you 😊
Got it 5:20 . Local strip club
Whatever it takes
I know this approach is attributed to Feynman, but I don’t think he ever described it - at least not in text. I think the spread of this attribution to Feynman is because ppl don’t fact check stuff do a reasonable degree but see something somewhere and retell it.
Do you know of any place where Feynman described this approach?
I do appreciate your explanatory videos. Thx.
Even in his lectures he emphasizes using common words and concepts to explain things as much as possible
@@1sor Sure. But to my knowledge Feynman never formulated this 'Feynman approach' that is attributed to him. Your post does not address that. Btw, I'm a big fan of Feynman, just not a fan of misattribution and believe that we should not spread misinformation.
everyone should note that IQ doesn't measure overall intelligence, it is just a temporary score on one type of puzzle skill. if you practice the test a few times you can go from 70 to 130 in a week, with an official proctor, because it is not measuring anything static or biological
you'll find people with advanced degrees and actual publications/award's don't ever care about "iq scores", since they know it is meaningless in academics. anyone who is neurotypical and motivated, and has necessary resources, will do well in their studies. don't let poor instruction from the past make you think certain subjects are beyond you
i suggest people unsure about their intelligence to study philosophy, since it will teach basic propositional logic and epistemology, which will aid in all aspects of your learning
I think this was Feynman’s way of mocking the IQ score system. It’s completely meaningless, and I’ve never met anyone at Harvard or MIT (a place where you would expect the smartest people on this planet) who ever cared about their IQ
Its a bit contradicting that Feynman had an IQ of 124 (slightly above the standdard deviation of IQ measurements from the average) but is being used as an example of extreme superior problemsolving (also often being mentioned by Stephan Wolfram), which is supposed to be the exact statement of the IQ Test
I agree. It could be that Feynman’s IQ was actually higher. Or it could also be an indication that the way we measure IQs is not accurate and meaningful at all
He had at least 150 IQ. You just can't learn to be super smart.
@@sylwek1177 actually I think a lot of us can.. obviously it doesn’t happen overnight, but with active practice and diligence who knows what strategies people can discover for themselves.. I myself have become a lot smarter over the past 1.5 years
I understand concepts really fast and am able to solve novel problems within that topic, minutes after learning it.
I’m no genius, and I know that for sure becuase 1.5 years ago, I didn’t even understand basic Trigonometry…
I rejected anything that had to do with learning and using my brain for my whole life… I deprived myself from intellect until i found multiple sparks that led me to craving it.
Since then I’ve come across hundreds of problems, with school, and life… solving them became my priority, I would try my best without help, I would use my brain till it hurt.. I would take breaks, and come back and re approach the problems.. succeeding in some and failing in others. Ultimately I have figured out patterns overtime and am the most efficient I have ever been.
Just for more perspective of how one can get drastically smarter
I’m an 2nd year engineering student with a 4.0 gpa who got a 1100 on the SAT
@@AmmoBops 1100 SAT out of 1600 isn't exactly worth bragging about though
1400 upwards is
@@william_SMMA lol bro, my whole point was that I’m dumb and got as low as a 1100, but have gotten smarter over time and now maintain a 4.0 gpa in college (I know grades don’t necessarily equate to intelligence but I don’t cheat, or rely too much on the internet
I use my head
thank God i do CS in Harvard 🎉 thank you for your enthusiasm 😊
Thank You 🙏❤
Well, it was good for a laugh anyway. You must hang out with Lex.
He's here at MIT - I should reach out to him at some point ahhahahaah
@@SamuelBoschMIT Lex frequently makes a fool of himself by engaging in long discussions about things he doesn't understand. You seem to have a similar problem. Proudly mentioning that you wrote a paper on quantum AI is like boasting that you wrote a paper on traffic management for flying carpets.
@@scientiouslooks like an attempt to start an intellectual fight
@@1sor If you are talking about me then, no. A fight would imply that either side has a chance of winning. Unfortunately, pseudo-scientific arguments and intuitive reasoning aren't much of a match for boilerplate evidence.
@@scientious One can design a game where the merit, accuracy of the arguments are being weighted to conclude in a binary decision
I felt so much better when he said he didn’t know what the meaning of the words in the drug test question were bc I didn’t either lol
😂
Samuel Bosch how do you exactly answer challenge problems in aops and how to absorb? much
You are an IPHO Medalist?? In many of your videos you have portrayed that you are not that good. That's really good to know and no wonder why you got into MIT. Also your way of speaking is very cyrstal clear.
I did win 3 IPhO medals actually, but got rejected for my undergrads by MIT :)
Have a look at my "life principles for success" video, and my "How to get into MIT as an international" videos for more details
@@SamuelBoschMIT 3 medals and still rejected?? Who got selected? Perfect IMO scorers and Field medalists?? also i will watch those two videos.
@@M9a3 The admission criteria are sometimes somewhat arbitrary. I know people with just 1 medal (not that it makes a big difference) who got admitted. There are so many factors that decide if you get in. Some of them rational, some of them quite random :)
Another banger video by my role model ✨
Congrats for 20k subs 🎈🎈
Thank you 😊 🥳💪
study physics
Subscribed. Brilliant 👏
Thank you 😊
thankyour sir
You’re very welcome 😉
awesome advice! Thanks Samuel!
You're very welcome 🙂
nice
Why do you move like an NPC
So if you never learned Bayes theorem in school, then to solve it, you would have to invent it on the spot here. That would've been more impressive.
Hhahaha yeah, if you’ve never heard about Bayes theorem, solving this would be quite impressive ahahahaha
Hi
I have a video idea
Could you make a video about how to write a research paper (with how to find a topic) as you have a lot of experience with that
It would be really helpful for high school students and I think that this is a topic that would interest a lot of people, it is kinda off topic from the whole channel but it would help
Here in Croatia, as you probably know, no one does this so it is really hard to write a research paper with no experience and no one to ask for help.
thank you for mentioning an example!! it helped so much! I usually struggle to understand a concept without seeing the application of it, so thank you!!
You’re welcome! 😊
@@SamuelBoschMIT You've got a new subscriber.. and a loyal fan! thanks for the vids Samuel! 🙃
im preparing ipho haha
Hey how its going i am really not foing well
Hello Samuel, is your IQ greater than 130 ? to be so good in physics ?
I never measured my IQ, and think it’s pointless to do so :)
WOW Klasse Content . Bin gerade am Gymnasium und habe dich durch Niklas Steenfat kennengelernt . Das ist Content der Generationen motiviert an sich zu arbeiten und die beste Version von sich selber zu werden .
Mein Abo ist aufjedenfall gesichert❤
Freut mich sehr 😊
What I got from this video was practice exercises and questions at the end of the lessons first.
Practice is everything! 🙂
You said 195+35=235 ? 23.5% 🤣
Hey dude I gotta ask I know I could solve difficult problems easily but easy things are really hard how to solve it.
Joseph: You are gonna say "You have to have the same concentration you have during solving difficult probelms" isn't it
Sam: You have to have the same concentration you have during solving difficult probelms oh wait oh no
Joseph gotcha
Hi glad have found this video. I was wondering what skills are required to solve problems in math counts and Olympiad? Can these skills be broken down and learned individually? Also how can somebody know that learning is happening? Thanks.
Guys, if your first attempt to solve a problem didn't work, don't quit,... or you may start another Amazon.
can we do an average of the error ( of the specifity and the sensitivityty) so 0,10 and 0.20, the average is an 0.15 probability of error. And we can do 0.15 * 0.95 (the population who don't consume drugs), and if it's superior at 5% it's mean that there is more people who will know an error in their test than the people who actually consume drugs. Cause if you are tested negative and you are really positive it's as bad than if you are tested positif but you are really negative
Hey Samuel, I watched this video ruclips.net/video/BW5yXCTu0hM/видео.htmlsi=OpJRwltiTVJC1i1O on your channel yesterday, and i know my passion is in physics,math and marathons. Can you recommend some problem books for the International IPho?
@12:08 you said “that means that only four out of five of the tests are actually correct “ shouldn’t it have been “ are not correct” as the probability is around 20% I.e 1 out of 5 is correct and 4 out of 5 are incorrect as the incorrect probability is 80%. Can someone please explain if I am getting something wrong? at the start of the problem he said closer to 1 is good but 4/5 is 80% and is close to 1.
Its nice video on solving real life drug test problem with Bayes theorem, your word "only four out of the test are actually correct a bit confusing" at 12:07. Do you mean actually only one? Thanks anyway
What are your thoughts on capitalism?
Interesting question. Well, I am a capitalist myself, given that I own a company 🙂 But I prefer not to go into political discussions on my RUclips channel, and stay rather neutral !
Asking right questions is half part of the solution
Exactly! 🙂
Well your brain function in some filed can be improved when you struggle so hard about that 😅😅 so forget about IQ
What was that anki sponsorship lol. Looks like this guy is selling out already. Content is fine but the constant push to like, subscribe and watch his other videos irritated me
Thanks man, I love the content♥️
Thank you! 😊
Infinity
Your videos are extremely helpful. Thanks!
You’re very welcome ☺️
You are the best:) thank u so much.
You’re very welcome 😉
What were the competitions of math, phsycis and computer science you did? AMC 10? USAPhO? USACO?
I’m not from the US. The main internal one was IPhO
“😊How to solve difficult problems “
Harvard cup as pen holder - outrageous! 🤣🤣🤣
Thanks
I love the hairstyle.
😁
4:36 bro I struggled to understand that.
And i failed to understand that
Hi, What device and app were using to write out your formulas?
Ah so funny. I have used the Fineman method since a kid even before I read about it when I was 10. Fineman was so cool!
Feynman talking to random strangers about his problems reminds me in part, of how they characterised House MD.
😂
Nice I learned a lot keep the good work
Thank you! Btw, a new video focused on learning math is coming out tomorrow 🙂
Steve Hsu says about Feynman's iq:
Feynman was universally regarded as one of the fastest-thinking and most creative theorists in his generation. Yet, it has been reported-including by Feynman himself-that he only obtained a score of 125 on a school IQ test.
I suspect that this test emphasized verbal, as opposed to mathematical, ability. Feynman received the highest score in the country by a large margin on the notoriously difficult Putnam mathematics competition exam, although he joined the MIT team on short notice and did not prepare for the test. He also reportedly had the highest scores on record on the math/physics graduate admission exams at Princeton.
It seems quite possible to me that Feynman's cognitive abilities might have been a bit lopsided - his vocabulary and verbal ability were well above average, but perhaps not as great as his mathematical abilities.
I recall looking at excerpts from a notebook Feynman kept while an undergraduate. While the notes covered very advanced topics for an undergraduate - including general relativity and the Dirac equation - it also contained a number of misspellings and grammatical errors. I doubt Feynman cared very much about such things.
I would put it this way:
If I were to compete with Feynman on verbal tasks, I would probably still lose but the difference would be measurable. However, if I tried the same on mathematical tasks, you probably could guess how poorly I woul do. Not saying problem solving strategies are not a huge advantage, I love your videos. But we should be realistic - no one with an iq of 124/125 can become the next Feynman here. And btw Samuel, do you know your iq? I think 150+ is reasonable, isnt it?
Good video!! Ill start talking to my cat about my college problems, who knows it becomes the cat genius haha
how sure are you that he wass not boasting about his IQ being 125?
unsure. IQ tests aren’t exactly accurate so even if it did say 125 on a test (doubt he would completely make up a number) it doesn’t really mean that much
@@SamuelBoschMIT there's a lot of critique or back and forth on his iq debate over the years. Thankfully, Carol Dweck and her team fortunately have some great news for people who worry about IQ.
Excellent! That makes so much sense! Thanks !
Don't forget to sign up for Skillshare with my link 🙂
I love this video. Instant sub
Thank you 🙂
@@SamuelBoschMIT You're a cool dude. Respect 👊
Feedback: You should work on your body language for better delivery.
Thank you!
Hey, im curious is there some trick/method in math with as huge impact as memory palace for improving memory? Ive heard of abakus and some japanesse verion of this tool which basically changes numbers to images and enables people to do huge mental calculations. I would be so grateful if you could recommend some starting resources :) thanks for great content :)
Not to say that your advice is bad at all, of course it's very good, but when you explained what sensitive and specific means, i immediately knew that the answer to the problem was no, because i remember seeing questions like this, and when the false positive rate (in this case 20%) is much higher than the percent of sample size (in this case 5%), you will definitely get a lot more false positives than true positives without needing to do any math, taking a few extra seconds i can see (95* 20%) = 19% of population will be false positives, and true positives, even with 100% sensitive would be 5%, and another second would show (90% * 5) = 4.5% true positive
The long-term idea is getting to the point where you can intuitively solve problems like this without having to explicitly solve it. So this is great 😊
@@SamuelBoschMIT yea no, absolutely this advice will be applicable elsewhere for me, my comment was purely that this example didnt work out for my personal viewing experience! i absolutely understand the message though
Oh my god Feynman just became my favorite scientist ever. The energy of doing physics at a strip club is something else
HHahahha exactly 😂
How do you write down the solution to remember it for Step 3 of the Feynman technique?
I love you
Hahaah thank you :)
Congrats to 20k followers, well deserved
Thank you Lottero 🙂
Also,I totally find myself on the wavelength of the students who are all about understanding STEM and later on due to not remembering have to look up the textbook or the notes again.I understand all the concepts being taught in class and it's all well then,but since I don't write the solution down, I'm not able to remember them clearly.
I totally have been overlooking the part of writing and how crucial it is.Thank you.