You guys should visit Storsjön in Sweden, I live by the lake and we have a sea creature here, I've seen "it" 3 times. I'm sure something is down in the deep,
It isn't misidentification, what people describe is much larger than a sturgeon. It has a very long neck, for more info, I've uploaded a documentary about the Lake Champlain monster on my channel. I always keep an open mind, I know that there's more to this planet then meets the eye(^^)
If I were you I would spend 15 minutes trying to find a list of all the other species that people believed to be fake and have your mind opened a little bit.
Sturgeon are smaller, the largest one seen in the lake was 6.6 feet. What people describe isn't even described similar to a sturgeon, you're probably talking about Samuel De Champlain's notes, not the actual description of the animal. People never described it having a scales, it has skin like a whale. Also, people would already know what a sturgeon is, they even claim to have seen Champ walking in the marshes, meaning that it being a sturgeon is false. It's described to even be 30 feet.
The Mansi photo doesn’t prove anything. It could be a creature; it could be a tree stump. There’s just one pic, why are there no continuous shots that show that the object was indeed animate? Most probably Mansi took a photo of an inanimate object, looked at it and thought: Hey, this looks like a dinosaur-ish-type-something if you squint your eyes. And the hoax went larger than the lake itself.
RIP Scott Mardis and William Dranginis - two fine researchers and friends that I miss.
1:07 that roar is so fake that it's funny
No durr Sherlock's.
You guys should visit Storsjön in Sweden, I live by the lake and we have a sea creature here, I've seen "it" 3 times. I'm sure something is down in the deep,
xSwedenPie really?
Same here in Canada. Ogopogo in Lake Okanagan.
Could you tell me what the creature looked like?
Got video evidence?
It isn't misidentification, what people describe is much larger than a sturgeon.
It has a very long neck, for more info, I've uploaded a documentary about the Lake Champlain monster on my channel.
I always keep an open mind, I know that there's more to this planet then meets the eye(^^)
I miss this monster project... They need to show it back in nat geo wild
If I a Mini sub expert I’d say “The Mini-Sub must’ve fallen down and hovered up again.”
Hi. I'm from the other side of the lake. Champy has been described as more of a Plesiosaurus than a sturgeon. He has a long neck, and flippers.
It’s a giant longnecked turtle
I think it might be a Fig~ment
If I were you I would spend 15 minutes trying to find a list of all the other species that people believed to be fake and have your mind opened a little bit.
Like the mountain gorillas or Barney
@@indieanna9481 like the giant squid that they thought went extinct millions of years ago but turned out to be alive in 2012 I believe
@@sebastianmireles6691 Wrong. The Coelacanth would be the only example that fits that bill.
Did you here the roar
Try tanystropheus .
Im 100% sure its probably a sturgeon. Its covered in bony plates , reaches 20ft plus and occasionally breaks the surface...
Sturgeon are smaller, the largest one seen in the lake was 6.6 feet.
What people describe isn't even described similar to a sturgeon, you're probably talking about Samuel De Champlain's notes, not the actual description of the animal.
People never described it having a scales, it has skin like a whale.
Also, people would already know what a sturgeon is, they even claim to have seen Champ walking in the marshes, meaning that it being a sturgeon is false. It's described to even be 30 feet.
Not only that ,There’s even been Echo location coming from the lake
It's pretty amazing that there are dozens of reported sightings, and not a single picture or video. This is ridiculous.
Ya dummy, there's the Mansi photograph.
In fact many pictures and anomalous videos clearly not a known animal to science. Living that is
The Mansi photo doesn’t prove anything. It could be a creature; it could be a tree stump. There’s just one pic, why are there no continuous shots that show that the object was indeed animate? Most probably Mansi took a photo of an inanimate object, looked at it and thought: Hey, this looks like a dinosaur-ish-type-something if you squint your eyes. And the hoax went larger than the lake itself.
sa
BS