Math of Musical Scales, Part 2 of 3

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии • 26

  • @AliTaj5610
    @AliTaj5610 Год назад +4

    Wow, I gotta say, your explanations are spot-on and super interesting! Not only do you break things down in a clear and easy-to-understand way, but I can totally see that scientist vibe in you. It's like you've got that natural curiosity and analytical thinking that real scientists have. Your passion for the topic really shines through, and it's awesome to see someone who not only knows their stuff but can also explain it in a fun and engaging manner. Keep up the great work!

  • @SwimnBird
    @SwimnBird Год назад +3

    I would pay for a slower paced course going into all of this, fascinating

  • @Mohammadparvazi
    @Mohammadparvazi Год назад

    i love your math series about music i had a question in my mind and something just wasnt making any sense but you covered it very well now i know the reason why we devide by 2 for the second time is because its sometimes nesseceray to get the number in wanted range

  • @gabrielrodriguez9413
    @gabrielrodriguez9413 3 года назад +3

    Wow; you not only explain this so well, but you make it incredibly interesting. Well done.

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 Год назад

    Great application of math to music!

  • @standardqueue
    @standardqueue 3 года назад +1

    Well done. I don't know why you don't have many more subs/views

  • @OneDrunkWizard
    @OneDrunkWizard 10 месяцев назад

    Aye subscribing. I would love to know why we settled on the 7/12 tone scale divisions of the octave. I have a theory it's rooted in sacr d geometry as the flower of life depicted in most cultures is a 6 sided shape and the inverse of it creates another 6 points for a total of 12 and it's all rooted in our perception of this chaos. We arbitrarily affix definitions to the misunderstood and thereby give it definition. Love your videos!

  • @lawrencetaylor4101
    @lawrencetaylor4101 Год назад

    An amazing series. Merci.

  • @franciscomagalhaes7457
    @franciscomagalhaes7457 2 года назад +1

    Christ I've been trying to find something that explains this stuff to me for years. Thank you so much for all the work you've put yourself through.

  • @EricaParker-n1c
    @EricaParker-n1c 10 месяцев назад +1

    Learning music theory-- okay, wait I'm confused. You called the second harmonic scale (3:2) a lydian mode. But, we constantly multiplied frequencies by 3/2, so how do we end up with semi-tones and tones? Is it that the 292.5 and 493.59 are the semitones? How can we be multiplying by a constant ratio but end up with notes differently spaced out from each other? Does anyone get what I mean? (I really struggle with music theory and I honestly think it's because no one was ever able to explain it like this. I've always wanted the /why/ it works, I feel like I'll understand it more if I can see its like, mathematical patterns and proof of why it works.)

    • @EricaParker-n1c
      @EricaParker-n1c 10 месяцев назад +1

      I just learned tones are more complicated than I assumed all these years. Also got to video three...lol

  • @caylan8095
    @caylan8095 2 года назад

    Thank you so very much for your time making this trilogy!

  • @RandomRelapse
    @RandomRelapse 3 года назад

    U get it my brother, keep making these videos so the masses too can understand

  • @nexyboye5111
    @nexyboye5111 11 месяцев назад

    9:36 is my favourite part

  • @havokca
    @havokca 3 года назад

    These are phenomenal videos. Thank you so much. :)

  • @yaniamamoto8419
    @yaniamamoto8419 3 года назад +1

    Darwin bless you, Tom Hanks! Great video

  • @tarkantakil2067
    @tarkantakil2067 2 года назад

    My man, you've done proper research on this topic. If you haven't already, I highly recommend getting a copy of On The Sensation Of Tone by Helmholtz.

  • @Nerthexx
    @Nerthexx 3 года назад +3

    It's interesting how if you average 1.973 and 2.027, you get exactly "2"

  • @fredriksorbom6511
    @fredriksorbom6511 2 года назад +1

    Good video. Someome (channel name: formant) apparently made a copycat video recently.

  • @Smitty-op4ld
    @Smitty-op4ld 4 года назад +2

    I'm sorry, in the plethora of great information you may have already covered this, but in my RUclips patience (maybe just when I'm on RUclips patience), I came to see why WWHWWWH sounds good with the major scale.
    That is, why (mathematically) does taking a whole step on the third interval of the scale sound so bad and I'm forced to do a half step when the previous and following steps are whole steps?!

    • @Matticusjk
      @Matticusjk 3 года назад

      i’m curious about this too. I think it’s be covered but i want an answer to this direct question as well

    • @halasimov1362
      @halasimov1362 3 года назад

      Because how it relates to the percieved tonal center (the tonic)

  • @scamlikely1442
    @scamlikely1442 3 года назад +1

    Thanks man cuz I'm good at math, but bad at music, not sure they're mutually exclusive anymore haha

  • @maciej12345678
    @maciej12345678 Год назад

    2:30 no looping ;/

  • @kitcosby
    @kitcosby 9 месяцев назад

    Please enjoy my 17 tone Just tempered scale (all in a ratio over 128/256)
    Best in the key of C for the whole numbers and storing the note ratios as a single byte. But it sounds best to the ear tuned about 220 hz. A depending on the weather.
    128 Hz. 256
    145 Hz. 290
    154 Hz. 308
    160 Hz. 320
    165 Hz. 330
    171 Hz. 342
    179 Hz. 358
    183 Hz. 366
    192 Hz. 384
    201 Hz. 402
    205 Hz. 410
    213 Hz. 426
    219 Hz. 438
    224 Hz. 448
    230 Hz. 460
    238 Hz. 476
    256 Hz. 512
    If you really want the second’s
    Here you go, at 21 tones all over 512 for the ratios:
    256
    284
    291
    307
    313
    320
    329
    341
    358
    366
    370
    384
    398
    402
    410
    427
    439
    448
    455
    461
    475
    484
    512
    Here is the scale in Hexadecimal
    The first is the octave the second the tone at that ratio.
    0100 256
    011C 284
    0123 291
    0133 307
    0139 313
    0140 320
    0149 329
    0155 341
    0166 358
    016E 366
    0172 370
    0180 384
    018E 398
    0192 402
    019A 410
    01AB 427
    01B7 439
    01C0 448
    01C7 455
    01CD 461
    01DB 475
    01E4 484
    0200 for the next octave.