How to Use the Aarke Carbonator
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Aarke Carbonator III: geni.us/wQOCo8
Try our coffee! geni.us/4AAmhpj
(As an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases)
How to use the Aarke Carbonator. In this video, we had some fun creating instructions for the sleek and modern Carbonator II by Aarke. This product uses standard Sodastream CO2 canisters, and is a great way to class-up your at-home sparkling water production.
Instagram: / lifestylelab_
Support the channel! www.lifestylel...
Filming Setup
Camera: geni.us/Hufs
Microphone: geni.us/Vvr3Dyp
Key light: geni.us/TBDpR4
Softbox: geni.us/4hZgboX
Backlights: geni.us/spg5S
Slider: geni.us/Fp5KU5
Tripod: geni.us/fDiXW
Fluid Head: geni.us/kFst
AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE:
Some of the links used in the description will direct you to Amazon, as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Aarke Carbonator III: geni.us/wQOCo8
(As an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases)
I bought one for Christmas and I’m more than satisfied with it.
This thing is a piece of art itself and would look good in any kitchen. I did spend half of that money on a beer carbonation apparatus. It does not look fancy but been pumping out great carbonated water for years now. I pay 15 CAD to fill up the CO2 cylinder and lasts for about half a year.
I rolled the cannister the same way but failed to catch it in time. Now I own a lot of dry ice.
I have the white version. Its awesome.
Your lighting is great! When is your studio tour?
Thanks!
As soon as we get the rest of the sound paneling and computer desk set up :)
So this is just a very expensive soda stream? Does it get higher pressures?
Love your espresso reviews and came across this. How do you like it? Do you still use it?
Still a great system, definitely more form over value from function. Don’t be expecting fantastic amazing quality for your money. It just looks nice.
@@LifestyleLab_ thanks and keep up the great work!
I have a soda stream, and I don't have to screw the bottle-up and manually control the CO2 with a lever as the soda stream does everything automatically and costs less: what is the point of spending more money for less functionality (other than the better look) ?
One could say that for anything--why buy a Mercedes if a honda gets you to to the same point? I personally have limited counterspace and would like to display it on my bar cart--so aesthetics mattered to me. I found one on Ebay for $130 (open box) and it has met my needs. I also like how the handle/components that you work the machine with are not made of plastic but instead stainless steel.
If I did have more counter space (an dI didnt find the deal on ebay) I too would have probably went witht he soda stream.
One is made of full plastic while the Aarke is full made aluminium and stainless.
It's much more premium and durable. Built like a tank whereas even the Crystal is cheap plastic toy in comparison...
How can you tell it’s faulty
thx but not this is the Carbonator II (plastic pipe) whereas the III has metal pipe...also slight difference in handle
Well I can’t link to a product that’s been discontinued now can I? 🤷🏻♂️
Makes sense to link to the most recent version
Why didn't we see clearly that CO2 bottle ? Is that a sodastream bottle ? :-p
Yes, the Aarke system uses standard Sodastream refills
Which one ?
@@TAS-Clips the non-quick connect type
Just switched from Sodastream's Crystal. Aarke is WAY better und much more durable und premium...
Crystal's glass bottle is really appealing😊
@@chrischew7242 I agree. But the rest is just very cheap plastic. Extremely disappointing!
Beautiful design, but that's an insane price.
The device makes a beeping sound. This video makes no mention of that feature, nor what it's for.
Our version of the machine had no such beep... there is nothing electronic to even emit a beep....
I'll stick with my drink mate I paid 99.00 for it, works just fine.
I'm sure it does!
This is definitely more of a designer piece than a functional upgrade
@@LifestyleLab_ the aarke is soooo beautiful… much more enjoyable as both functional and beautiful kitchen decor
Why millennials chose to do insane things like this? For that price one could buy a lifetime's supply of Topo Chico.
I get the idea of not needing a design version vs a soda stream. But I think buying all those topo Chico is missing the point. Doing this yourself saves money, creates less waste, and you're using already existing municipal water sources vs stealing it from local populations water tables. I'm not a millennial and don't mean this as an attack on your comment. Just adding insight and don't really think it's a millennial thing.
@@zionlion02
Saves money? Did you look up the prices? The hardware by itself is $300. The CO2 refills alone will cost more than Top Chico. I used TC as an example; you can find much cheaper brands. All the big soda manufacturers have carbonated water, which in itself seem to be another millennial fad.
Municipal water is not "existing". It has to be "produced" (by treating lake water). The amount that you drink is insignificant compared to the rest of your water consumption (shower, toilet, cooking, laundry, etc). You're not saving the planet.
Maybe some specialty brands are truly bottling from spring water, but most of them are just filtered municipal water anyways.
Bottom line; just drink tap water. If you want a carbonated water for a change, go get one from the supermarket.
@@itsm3th3b33 I agree with all your comment... except the fact you omitted to comment about the considerable reduction in waste (plastic).
@@yodalf42
That's is precisely why I chose to use Topo Chico as an example. TP comes in glass bottles. I myself drink tap water. The added fluoride is good for my teeth. ;)
The plastic waste is self inflicted by the millennials. So they come up with this stupid carbonation idea to fix another stupid idea (carrying water in plastic bottles everywhere they go)? No, you won't die if you don't drink water every 10 minutes.
@@itsm3th3b33 fair enough thanks for the explanation, I've never heard of TP before but it makes sense. As I said before, valid points.