FLIR C5 vs Fluke PTi120 Thermal Camera Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- FLIR C5: bit.ly/2WOto3w
Fluke PTi120: bit.ly/3tcUKMJ
Specifications: 00:19
Camera Interfaces & Menus: 04:12
Electrical Demo: 06:42
Building Inspection Demo: 08:13
Both the Fluke PTi120 and FLIR C5 are powerful pocket-sized thermal cameras. In many ways these IR cameras are quite similar, but they differ in a few key ways. Devin, one of our on-staff ITC Certified Thermographers, breaks down every part of this comparison so you can pick the best tools for your needs.
The first thing most people consider when it comes to thermal cameras is the infrared resolution. In this case, the FLIR C5 takes the edge with 160x120 resolution compared to only 120x90 on the Fluke PTi120. That means that overall, the FLIR will provide sharper images. You can see this in the demo sections of this video.
The Fluke PTi120 does offer slightly better thermal sensitivity at 60mk (0.06°C) compared to 70mk (0.07°C) on the FLIR C5. That means the PTi120 will be able to detect slightly smaller temperature differences.
Temperature range is one important area where these two cameras differ. On the FLIR C5, the maximum temperature limit is 400°C. On the Fluke PTi120 base model (shown in this video), the maximum temperature that can be measured is 150°C. Fluke does offer a version of the PTi120 with a 400°C temperature limit, but this model is significantly more expensive than both the C5 and PTi120 base model.
Both cameras offer a form of image blending. On the FLIR C5 you get the powerful FLIR MSX which is arguably the best IR blending technology on the market. It is proprietary to FLIR and provides excellent contrast and context in your IR images. It is not opacity blending, it's much better - FLIR uses a unique algorithm to extract visual details and overlay them on thermal images.
Fluke offers IR Fusion which is a traditional opacity blending technology. With this feature, you can adjust the opacity of the thermal image to reveal the visual image. This does add context and detail but as you lower the opacity, you lose much of the thermal detail.
Both cameras support cloud data upload. On both cameras you can connect to WiFi to automatically upload images to the cloud as you capture them. On the FLIR C5, the feature is called FLIR Ignite. On the Fluke PTi120, it is called Fluke Connect.
Both cameras also include free reporting software. You can use these software suites to edit images and create professional reports for your clients or supervisors.
In terms of side-by-side comparison of these cameras, the menus look different but do largely the same things. Nearly all the same settings can be found on either camera. Check out the interface demo to see exactly how each camera's menu looks.
We also tested each camera in an electrical and building inspection setting. Each one performed well, but the FLIR C5 did get a big boost from its higher resolution and FLIR MSX technology. Check out the demos to see for yourself.
I have had a c2 and c5 both bricked after very little use. Fantastic tc when working.
Hello guys ! thanks for this comparison. Did you try these equipments on electronic boards ? I'm wondering which might be the best to measure thermal effects on small electronic components?
We have tested the C5 in electronics applications but not the PTi120. Of these two cameras, the FLIR C5 is the better option because it has higher IR resolution. That will be very important for your application so you can clearly see the small components on the board. You can see a demo of the C5 looking at circuit boards in some of our other comparison videos - check them out below.
C5 vs ShotPro: ruclips.net/video/s-fEjPCFU1A/видео.html
C5 vs C3: ruclips.net/video/ooN-CI8RPYw/видео.html
@@TEquipment thank tou very much for your analysis. The Flir model C5 is definitely the best equipment for my applications.
Hello Devin. Can either camera be used for inspecting boiler heat exchangers (of various types) for leaks as a non destructive technique? As manufacturer's do not recommend hydrostatic testing which could void ASME and CSA pressure vessel certification here in Canada. I would like your input on this one. Thanks. It looks to me that FLIR would be a better choice.
Me too I would like to know im a stationary engineer
Yes, these cameras would be excellent for that application. They will clearly show leaks as hotter spots in the thermal image. FLIR is a great choice - check out this video to compare the C5 to its younger brother the C3-X: ruclips.net/video/L2GDGlyS5fo/видео.html
You might also want to check out some of our demo videos using the Fotric 348A - this camera is a bit more advanced than the pocket cameras but the demo videos will give you a better idea of the possible applications of thermal imaging: ruclips.net/p/PLYkzrgUgH3zcSM_5yf3_Gl0mb3UTTYVTZ
Thanks for the video. All the camara are similar, but for your opinion wich one are the best?
Hello! Most of our cameras are similar with varying differences as we recognize what you need depends on how you're using the camera. Our product specialists can make recommendations for your needs and budget if you contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here:
www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
It can see liking water pipe under the ceramic floor? (Hot water) for plumbing
how far the distance between object and the camera to get the best measurement result? is there any difference between those 2 cameras for the distance?
does the Flir have any apple app compatibility for generating reports?
Hello! The FLIR C5 works with the cloud-based FLIR Ignite solution. When you connect the camera to a computer it will be identified as an external device (like a phone or digital camera). The C5 will not be detected by FLIR Tools app on the PC; however, the images can be copied manually from the camera into any FLIR software to create reports, such as FLIR Thermal Studio.
If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here:
www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
If you put your data sheet closer to lens, then it would not be so obvious that you're peeking on a side for data.
Does the C5 add the FLIR logo to all images?
Yes, the C5 will apply a small logo overlay to images in the upper right corner.
They both suck compared to what you can get nowadays
Would you care to extrapolate and be useful? Or are you “that” type
I would listen. But …