Guido van Rossum on Mojo programming language | Chris Lattner and Lex Fridman

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июн 2023
  • Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Chris Lattner: Future ...
    Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
    - iHerb: lexfridman.com/iherb and use code LEX to get 22% off your order
    - Numerai: numer.ai/lex
    - InsideTracker: insidetracker.com/lex to get 20% off
    GUEST BIO:
    Chris Lattner is a legendary software and hardware engineer, leading projects at Apple, Tesla, Google, SiFive, and Modular AI, including the development of Swift, LLVM, Clang, MLIR, CIRCT, TPUs, and Mojo.
    PODCAST INFO:
    Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
    Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
    Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
    RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
    Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
    Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
    SOCIAL:
    - Twitter: / lexfridman
    - LinkedIn: / lexfridman
    - Facebook: / lexfridman
    - Instagram: / lexfridman
    - Medium: / lexfridman
    - Reddit: / lexfridman
    - Support on Patreon: / lexfridman
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 96

  • @LexClips
    @LexClips  Год назад +5

    Full podcast episode: ruclips.net/video/pdJQ8iVTwj8/видео.html
    Lex Fridman podcast channel: ruclips.net/user/lexfridman
    Guest bio: Chris Lattner is a legendary software and hardware engineer, leading projects at Apple, Tesla, Google, SiFive, and Modular AI, including the development of Swift, LLVM, Clang, MLIR, CIRCT, TPUs, and Mojo.

    • @camy_dev
      @camy_dev Год назад

      It's about being compatible with pre existing python code basis

  • @Mik1604
    @Mik1604 11 месяцев назад +156

    This language should obviously have been named Monty and it is an unforgivable shame that is isn’t.

    • @DuarteMolha
      @DuarteMolha 8 месяцев назад +5

      You are absolutely 💯 right

    • @user-te1fp3ik8n
      @user-te1fp3ik8n 8 месяцев назад +2

      😂😂😂 right

    • @isabelomakhanya
      @isabelomakhanya 8 месяцев назад +2

      Unforgivable ‼️

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 7 месяцев назад +1

      ...And programmers in it, ([ 3:20 ]) "Monticians".
      _Right?_

    • @donovanvanderlinde3478
      @donovanvanderlinde3478 3 месяца назад

      👑 You dropped this King

  • @_____case
    @_____case 9 месяцев назад +20

    Every time Lattner has worked on language infrastructure, he has never missed. Every language ecosystem *needs* an evolution strategy to get better. I'm optimistic that this will be Python's "successor".

  • @-sanket-
    @-sanket- 10 месяцев назад +24

    Great I heard some companies are hiring with 10 + years of experience for mojo

    • @xnegusx
      @xnegusx 5 месяцев назад

      nah that's cap, I say I guy on LinkedIn who completed his Masters in 2022 or 23 that works at Modular

    • @stanvanillo9831
      @stanvanillo9831 4 месяца назад +1

      HAHA THIS JOKE NEVER GETS OLD

    • @vncstudio
      @vncstudio 12 дней назад

      😂

  • @vicentefeced5889
    @vicentefeced5889 Год назад +8

    Mojo for the win, As soon as it is out, I will go full out on it

  • @vectoralphaAI
    @vectoralphaAI Год назад +23

    From Pythonistas to Mojicians. I like it. Plus this has been done multiple times. Its good to move the industry forward by using better improves languages. Like:
    Objective-C -> Swift
    Java -> Kotlin
    JavaScript -> TypeScript
    C -> C++ -> (Carbon, Rust)
    And now Python -> Mojo.

    • @guntherss2672
      @guntherss2672 Год назад +2

      Exactly! But industries are reluctant to adopting to new technology because they don't wanna recreate the entire framework which sucks

    • @Python_in_UA
      @Python_in_UA 9 месяцев назад +1

      Its cool. But do not forget ABC and 1000+ another programming languages. Mojo is one of them.

    • @user-te1fp3ik8n
      @user-te1fp3ik8n 8 месяцев назад +1

      Mojician 😂

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 7 месяцев назад

      @@user-te1fp3ik8n ([ 3:20 ]) is where they call them that!

    • @vyyr
      @vyyr 7 месяцев назад +1

      idk about the c->c++ part, I also don't know about the c++ -> carbon part.
      If anything it seems like the market of C and C++ successors is going to be dispersed among multiple languages, and even then C is most likely going to perservere for a long time, on the other hand every person that has spent considerable ammount of time with c++ prays to God that some language finally succeeds that piece of bloated garbage

  • @kikokobayashi
    @kikokobayashi Год назад +17

    The field of programming languages is constantly evolving, I think.

  • @pad8941
    @pad8941 3 месяца назад +1

    I always love chris's language design

  • @icns01
    @icns01 5 месяцев назад +2

    Well if things don't work out, Chris can always get a job as a diplomat!😂
    Great communication skills!👍

  • @kalpakHere
    @kalpakHere Год назад +18

    Mojicians, it is !!

  • @javadeveloper9442
    @javadeveloper9442 Год назад +8

    This may surprise you, i still create ai in java, java 21 is so good, and future releases will be a game changer

    • @guntherss2672
      @guntherss2672 Год назад +9

      Boomer..lol jk

    • @ultrasound1459
      @ultrasound1459 9 месяцев назад +2

      Java is dead

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 7 месяцев назад

      Is this a meme account or real news? I'm interested if it's real news.

    • @Python_in_UA
      @Python_in_UA 7 месяцев назад +1

      Any language with OOP paradigm only - has no future. Bc it is not OOP like Alen wanted

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 6 месяцев назад

      @@ITSecNEO "Good joke" :|
      _- A 17 year old writing a game engine in Java in 2023._

  • @smanzoli
    @smanzoli 11 месяцев назад +2

    When will be Mojo fully out? Still in 2023?

  • @kevingold1091
    @kevingold1091 Год назад +7

    2:21: To boldly go where no Python program has ever gone before.

    • @handofstranger
      @handofstranger Год назад

      durn durn durn deeern

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 7 месяцев назад

      I was imagining Python _in_ the kernel.

  • @RellyBautista-np4pj
    @RellyBautista-np4pj Месяц назад

    I also like python, my first language is javascript but i hate curly braces so i shift to python like language, the coffeescript.

  • @pjmoran42
    @pjmoran42 Год назад +7

    So how does IDEs tool set and debugging work with Mojo?

    • @nakibingestevenadrian6683
      @nakibingestevenadrian6683 Год назад

      It is still under active development.Around 8 Months old so the ecosystem is still developing

    • @vicenzogiuseppe6500
      @vicenzogiuseppe6500 Год назад

      Amor

    • @seventeeen29
      @seventeeen29 Год назад +2

      It's llvm based, ide tooling wil be quite easily to get up and running once it's being used in production

    • @DavidRagazzi
      @DavidRagazzi 9 месяцев назад

      They provided a plugin for Visual Studio. JetBrains already demonstrated interest in a plugin for PyCharm or even a new IDE for it.

  • @NisseOhlsen
    @NisseOhlsen Год назад +1

    But Lex, where is your Flying V ?

  • @danellwein8679
    @danellwein8679 Год назад

    is there a plug in from Wolfram for Python ..

    • @smarthumanism3221
      @smarthumanism3221 Год назад

      Wolfram... I encountered it in collge, but it was too expensive to use it. So I moved to Python and am very satisfied...
      But sometimes I miss the consistent rules and systems in Mathematica as it was maintained by one entity.

    • @kevinmcfarlane2752
      @kevinmcfarlane2752 Год назад

      Ther are WolframAlpha plugins for the Chat AIs so I'm assuming that under the hood these are being called from Python?

    • @jasondads9509
      @jasondads9509 2 месяца назад

      you can just call their api, if not you can call their web api

  • @ashutoshchar940
    @ashutoshchar940 6 месяцев назад +2

    They should have named it python++

    • @omarjimenezromero3463
      @omarjimenezromero3463 4 дня назад

      it could be more logical and marketing friendly because is the same sht they did with C, so if you know how have been things in the last 20 years, python++ were sure a better name.

  • @thegoru0106
    @thegoru0106 Год назад +24

    Doesn't Julia solves this exact problem? I don't get it.

    • @alejandroenriquez8508
      @alejandroenriquez8508 Год назад +1

      Well, jack of all trades, master of none.

    • @alexshaykevich509
      @alexshaykevich509 Год назад +3

      @@tseclassestseclasses4955 The industry is learn new things for the sake of learning new things though. I heard all these things already when he created Swift. Now, apparently, we need yet another new language. The truth is that these decisions are driven by personality not engineering.

    • @davidh00
      @davidh00 Год назад

      ​@alexshaykevich509 Agreed. High levels of egoism and sense of legacy with tech movers and shakers.

    • @user-xs9ey2rd5h
      @user-xs9ey2rd5h Год назад +12

      Julia has shit libraries and it doesn't have the exact same syntax as python as a subset. The documentation is awful and there were/(and probably) are bugs in for instance zygote

    • @joelmanning249
      @joelmanning249 Год назад +8

      Python is popular and known by a larger pool of people. Mojo also possesses features that are utilised in abundance in C++ and Java for example both of which have high exposure and usage in the world. It’s not complicated take the best of both worlds and put them into one as opposed to learning a brand new language

  • @gorojo1
    @gorojo1 9 месяцев назад +4

    "So...package ported to Mojo, then a Python interface." This is why Lex is the Feynman of computer science.

  • @justinfuruness7954
    @justinfuruness7954 8 месяцев назад +3

    Idk, I tried mojo. It significantly slowed down my python code, by about 20%. And was 600% slower than pypy. Maybe it’s good for certain things, but I think their marketing team overhyped it like crazy.

    • @Brahvim
      @Brahvim 7 месяцев назад +1

      ...Sorry!?

    • @RJ-or8bw
      @RJ-or8bw 10 дней назад

      Dictionaries aren't optimized yet. Was it just running your 100% python code slower? Or did you add the static typing and it slowed you down?

    • @justinfuruness7954
      @justinfuruness7954 6 дней назад +1

      @@RJ-or8bw It was running 100% python code slower, didn't change any static typing. It was moreso that the language claims its a superset of python but it slows down actual python code, and is way slower than pypy code. Maybe there's specific use cases for it where that isn't the case, it just isn't marketed as such imo.

  • @53nat0r
    @53nat0r Год назад +2

    All my colleagues have moved away from python to golang. My friends in other companies are migrating to golang too. Too fast and easy to learn

    • @chamber3593
      @chamber3593 11 месяцев назад +1

      Golang is not for AI.

    • @armincal9834
      @armincal9834 11 месяцев назад

      Why golang and not rust?

    • @smanzoli
      @smanzoli 11 месяцев назад

      @@armincal9834 easy and fast enough vs difficult...

  • @nandoflorestan
    @nandoflorestan 13 дней назад

    Mojo isn't even open source. That's gross.

  • @Python_in_UA
    @Python_in_UA 9 месяцев назад +2

    Sorry but as fo me Mojo is a girl and boy in one body. Interesting? Yes. Wanna to be - not yet.

    • @omarjimenezromero3463
      @omarjimenezromero3463 4 дня назад

      anime futanaries sound interesting, but you sure want girls and boys around anyway XD

  • @ehsankhorasani_
    @ehsankhorasani_ Год назад +2

    I wish it didn't have python syntax, not a fun of those indentations

  • @naninano8813
    @naninano8813 2 месяца назад

    this python craze must end. what an awful, awful thing to look at. hard to read hard to reason about. disguising. language design peaked at java

    • @AlexRodriguez-gb9ez
      @AlexRodriguez-gb9ez 11 дней назад

      Smalltalk, Lisp(homoiconocity, macros, quote), also maybe the algebraic effect type languages seem much better designed than modern languages

  • @just_A_doctor
    @just_A_doctor Год назад

    Python 4 is coming soon the game will change on u soon 🔜
    No need to new Lang . We are good with py

    • @arthurpenndragon6434
      @arthurpenndragon6434 Год назад +3

      guido himself said python 4 might not even happen.

    • @fenixfve2613
      @fenixfve2613 Год назад +2

      There will be no python 4, there will be python 3.13, 3.14... 3.99, 3.100... 3.1488

    • @just_A_doctor
      @just_A_doctor Год назад +1

      @@arthurpenndragon6434 he said not on 2023 or even 2024 he didn't said it is not coming but next 2025 the new update is coming and when that happens every system made with py 3 is gonna be outdate like the py 2

    • @chamber3593
      @chamber3593 11 месяцев назад

      After 3 years maybe because GIL is under removal with the help of meta engineer.

    • @alxjones
      @alxjones 10 дней назад

      You definitely don't speak for the entirely of the Python user base. Being able to easily get features like SIMD/vectorization and a borrow checker while keeping the simplicity of Python's syntax, _and_ being compatible with all existing Python code, that has a lot of appeal to many.

  • @atultripathi9166
    @atultripathi9166 9 месяцев назад +1

    He is lying