M2 Vs M1 Mac mini DaVinci Resolve 4K Render Test, Is It Worth Upgrading?

Channel Support :
Patreon : / retrogamervx
My social media :
/ 330119565983
Twitter : / retrogamervx
In this video, we put the M1 and M2 Mac Mini models to the test by conducting a 4k render using Davinci Resolve, a popular video editing and color grading software. The M1 and M2 are the latest Apple silicon chips, with the M2 being the newer and more powerful of the two.
By the end of the video, viewers should have a clear understanding of how the M1 and M2 Mac Mini models perform when it comes to 4k video rendering using Davinci Resolve. This video is perfect for anyone who is considering purchasing a new Mac Mini for video editing and wants to see how the latest Apple silicon chips compare.
#macmini #macminim2 #davinciresolve
m1 m2 Mac mini apple davinci resolve 4k render render test go pro mobile compare head to head test extreme silicon apple silicon creator RUclips upgrade is mac mini m2 worth waiting for mac mini m2 benchmarks vs m1 mac mini m2 benchmarks mac mini m2 render speed dkoldies dk oldies

[@elyuw]

Love the T-Shirt :)

[@RetroGamerVX]

Thankyou :)

[@monkstandinglast]

Never going to use a mac but good to know the knowledge cheers for the short n sweet vid although for a couple of mins faster personally I'd stay with the m1 and enjoy a few extra beer gulps lol da vinci is awesome so many options to make editing smoother so since you know what your doing that difference am sure you could squeeze back with tweaking a few settings etc.

[@bensteelemusic]

the upside of macs, of course, is that their keyboards come with punctuation as standard

[@richarddcrossley]

I think one the big differences is the m2 has the built in media encoder you used to only get on the M1 Pro chips for compatible video codecs. I don’t video edit though I do use M1 Pro laptop so this is just off my head.

[@terjemaurset6133]

When encoding 1080p then you are supposed to use H.264. But on EVERYTHING else with a higher resolution you are supposed to use H.265. In some scenarioes H.265 will encode faster than H.264.

[@werner77wda]

Render time in M1 is 12'06" and M2 in 10'25". That´s a 13,91% invrease in performance in this test.

[@adityachaudhary554]

Can you test , some fusion animation ( text animation) in davinci resolve.

[@RetroGamerVX]

Not now, wife claimed the m1 ;)

[@adityachaudhary554]

@@RetroGamerVX just borrow for some hours and make a video.
i am saying this because in whole RUclips there is no channel, who have made video about testing mac mini m2 for davinci resolve fusion(animations) .

[@RetroGamerVX]

@@adityachaudhary554 You try and pry a computer out of my wife's hands!! lol

[@hecticaperture]

Im curious of knowing a test of actual workflow. Although its nice, 14%, or whatever it scales to on larger projects, isnt still enough to call it an upgrade for just RENDERING alone. I need to see
scrolling through the timeline with edits and cuts and color adjustments and fusion effects and several different sources per clip etc. the M1 base takes an absolute shyte in these scenarios, and active editing in that lag fiesta is no fun.

[@rhydermike]

What if you simply prefer the looks of the M2 over the older model? [joke]

[@RetroGamerVX]

Lol, slap lol

[@Giannis_Stilos_]

for 2 seconds the difference is funny! who owns m1 there is no reason to go to m2 better to wait for m3 or M4!

[@RetroGamerVX]

It's not a 2 second difference in the tests in the vidro.

[@NicuCastravet]

BMW M4?