Getting deceived while not understanding anything isn't learning. Think about it more like elektromagnetism. There is no negativ or positive electricity, there is also no positive or negative magnetism. What we perceive is just the direction of the flow. Magnetism is actually an acceleration, so is gravity (just dielectric). The same way magnets coherent fields try to form unity, matter does. The more accumulates the more it attracts. So matter and anti matter and the unbalance may be a result of the expansion over time and is just a derivative of the +/- electricity analogism. I also don't really believe in the atom model theory, sure there are substructures of matter/reality and molecular bonds chemical structures (eg crystal formations) etc are real. But it's more like "in reality there is no single point in time that stands still" (just clap and it immediately will be over), sooo it's more like we the observers force schrödingers cat to make a decision of how it wants to present itself to us while we try to keep a single moment in time within a picture, though there is just the flow. In my opinion it's better explained with a vector field of potential movement and velocity (acceleration) of these electrons moving in a vertex pattern around the core. This ultimately has something to do with the fundamental properties of prime numbers and I am writing papers on them (project them on a duodecimal (clock) system, and keep counting around the clock (1: 13, 25; 2: 14, 26...) then mark all the primes and you will also finde patterns like in the DNA.
Antimatter is science fiction. It's a faulty theory that probably originates from radioactive decay and fission. Antimatter claims to produce massive amounts of energy when antimatter and matter interact. Same as fission, it causes matter to release huge amounts of energy (nuclear explosion, hydrogen bomb). You can tell antimatter is science fiction. It explodes when it comes into contact with matter, supposedly. It should have all been annihilated then. It also violates the law of conservation of energy, matter can not be destroyed. That it explodes when it comes in contact with matter is just an idea, without any explanation. Like some alternate explanation for fission and radioactive decay.
@@RomanHold This is interesting, thank you for sharing. This is going to lead me down a rabbit hole for a long time. Just as you mentioned the observer, as an example with our body and consciousness some believe it is this self-awareness from the nature of attention to our body changes the very experience with and perception of it, which, inevitably, changes ourselves (Jonathan Gibson 2019).
The fact that we exist in spite of the annihilation process might be due to the presence of the phase shift occurring between the anti particles. The quantum mechanics describes this phenomenon and might explain also the presence of time as we experience it.
This is funny...because there actually is an anti-green particle. In quantum chromodynamics there is color charge. Red, Green, Blue. All three have a corresponding anti-particle: anti-red, anti-blue, and anti-green.
Two photons in fact. There is also a process called a pair instability supernova where the star gets so hot that the gamma rays have so much energy they start forming electron-positron pairs. As a star depends on the gamma ray pressure to hold back gravity, without the gamma rays, the star collapses.
Question: How can an antiparticle travel through a cloud chamber? Are the bits of "cloud" not matter? Why doesn't the antiparticle annihilate with the matter?
Antimatters only annihilate its own counterpart. For example, positrons only "blow" themselves up if they come into contact with electrons. Otherwise they behave like ordinary matters with the rest of the universe. There's also a group of particle called the Mesons, which is made up of a pair of quark-antiquark of different flavours. In some cases, Mesons do make up of the same quark-antiquark pair (charm-anticharm for instant) but those have very short lifetime. The point is, it's possible for antimatters to interact with matters in a normal way, provided that they're not the exact "opposite" of one another.
Could the universe be any other way than it is? Why anti-matter? Why dark matter? Why 3 families of particles? Well, the Dirac equation suggests that anti- matter is the logical mathematical consequence of quantum mechanics and special relativity.
String theory is a scam like Michio Kaku .. Brian Green is a looser that never got that Nobel Prize in Physics he so desperately wants .. Maybe he should apply for the Nobel Prize on antisemitizm
In 3:20 it says to avoid annihilation there's an imbalance between matter and antimatter and that's why all we see today is matter, so how Carl Andersen take a picture of antimatter? Sorry maybe i just dont understand it clearly, can anyone dumb it down for me?😅
What if the big bang came from a black hole or a white hole? Could the information stored be disbursed and rearranged? Could the imbalance be created from the split of information at the event horizon? It's moments like this that make me want to learn the math behind these theories so I can work these thoughts out.
You dont need to learn math to understand any of this. If i ask you right now, what is matter? What would your answer be? Huh? What is MATTER? Youd likely tell me, everything is matter, every single thing. So, if anti matter is exactly like matter, what is anti matter????? What would your answer be then? Would you tell me, everything? That's fine, but where can we find this "anti everything"? Food for thought. Death is not The end of our existence.
I think the big bang is just the total death of the previous universe. Melodysheep made a video of the life of our universe and i totally believe that the end of our universe is a big bang for the next universe. We're organism bounded by time. So this happens in a linear manner. But for a higher being, aka "god" this happen all at the same time. Aka 'multiverse'
If there's matter and anti-matter that when combined create energy couldn't there be energy and anti-energy... and if they combine would they create matter?
This happens in a pair instability supernova. The gamma rays formed are so energetic that two gamma ray photons combine and form an electron and a positron.
Maybe at the moment of the big bang, matter and antimatter preconditions were arranged as charged imbalances much like a ''pip" and "shell" within a nuclear warhead? As the initial universe rapidly expanded the antimatter charged area being the shell and the matter charged area being the pip, the antimatter is still out there, but expanding as an antimatter wave front beyond the CMB horizon? It would go a long way to solving the math problem if true?
Although, there is still a problem which seems to remain unanswered and that is of the nature of fully formed galaxies 13.3 billion light years in distance. If galaxies can be seen fully formed at 13.3 bil light years distant, then wouldn't it be correct to assume there was vast quantities of time before that moment when the photons left those galaxies which they needed to fully form as 13.3 billion year old galaxies? If I'm not mistaken, this leaves .5 billion years from the moment of the big bang for galaxies to fully form. If that is the case, then how is the observed distance between these early formed galaxies to be explained at the furthest points of observable distance across the entire cosmological background, given that we are so observably close to Andromeda locally?
maybe there is alot of anti matter just not in our part of the universe. Ie, 2 universes might have collided creating BB where one was majority anti matter and one normal matter creating the CMB and leaving out the majority of anti matter
The universe is still expanding from the big bang, but eventually the expansion will stop and the antimatter will push it all back in a big crunch that will eventually bang again.
Its pretty simple really. Mankind discovered antimatter centuries ago, A child could do it at home (although we hope not), create fire. Harvesting antimatter is another question.
do matters have antimatters but antimatters don't have matters? what if the antimatters had their own matters that cancelled their existence and the matters have other antimatters and so on cancelling each other's existence in an infinite way
Maybe not the smartest question of all but what if at the big bang there was a perfect 50-50 split and the huge ammount of energy realeased somehow created more matter than anti matter? or that's just simply impossible.
So if 1,000,001 electrons annihilate 1,000,000 positrons and only 1 electron is left to exist, that is a lot of energy to be released. Did that cause the inflation of the universe?
This doesn't change your question, but I think they're saying 1,000,000 electrons annihilate 1,000,000 positrons. But there would have needed to be 1,000,001 electrons for every 1,000,000 positrons, so there would still be enough electrons left over to make the universe we see.
Everyone asks why there is something " matter"intsead of nothing .. the question is structurally wrong to ask thus we are among matter wich our senses are evoluted with it a matter wich is necessary containing us therefor we experience .. the nothing " antimatter or dark matter " is not within us nor containing our senses ، it have effects on the expa and of space and time dilatation and our cellular gray matter cannot comprehense the complexity on how simple it can be
It can be used to detect cancer. That's what a PET scan uses. The P stands for positrons, Which is anti-matter. So while it won't cure cancer, it can be used to let the doctors know there is cancer and then they can treat the cancer.
Physics has become a antimatter festival, everything is so imaginary that only equations can "prove", but what they prove? They're just equations, they're just more antimatter.
omg if this is true then i know wat it is !!!!!. it is 1 exsisting side and then the non exsistinge side so meaning there is a spirit world we cant se or touch .somting like that . the problem is solved. its not nonsens becors he say it him self we woud not exist and that is correct there is 1 existing and 1 non existing and we are in the existing side at the moment !!! only problem is how can we find out without being dead....
May the antimatter scattered as a bubbles in small spaces and formed the blackholes ,, May be Matter expands in to space , but antimatter schrink in to space ,, matter is going thinner with time , and antimatter goes denser with time ,
Why creation out of the empty space is required and why to maintain the rules of the particles and why to annihilate them unnecessarily??? I am eager to ask this question with the funny fellow "GOD". I request everyone to share it to HIM... THANKS...
Nonononononono.... Es que esto da risa. Es cierto, siempre hay dos polos. Y lo chistoso es que puede incluso ser igual de complicado que la física cuántica. Una infinidad de universos paralelos a cada uno.
Think of two waves 90 degrees out of phase. When they meet they cancel. Particles are also waves. So one particle wave cancels the other particle wave.
It probably would look like ordinary gold. The positrons in the anti-gold would probably affect light the same way electrons do in regular gold. There are no anti-photons
its very possible that for each universe their is a anti-universe. when matter from one universe goes to the other. Big Boom! its gone became energy again. from energy new universe born again
thank you very much from ALGERIA. THE ONLY ONE TRUTH IS ALLAH CREATOR OF ALL. In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful (1) Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, (2) The Beneficent, the Merciful. (3) Owner of the Day of Judgment, (4) Thee (alone) we worship; Thee (alone) we ask for help. (5) Show us the straight path, (6) The path of those whom Thou hast favoured. Not (the path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray. (7)
I love learning even if I can't explain it or understand it all. Many more mysteries to solve! 😃
Getting deceived while not understanding anything isn't learning. Think about it more like elektromagnetism. There is no negativ or positive electricity, there is also no positive or negative magnetism. What we perceive is just the direction of the flow. Magnetism is actually an acceleration, so is gravity (just dielectric). The same way magnets coherent fields try to form unity, matter does. The more accumulates the more it attracts. So matter and anti matter and the unbalance may be a result of the expansion over time and is just a derivative of the +/- electricity analogism. I also don't really believe in the atom model theory, sure there are substructures of matter/reality and molecular bonds chemical structures (eg crystal formations) etc are real. But it's more like "in reality there is no single point in time that stands still" (just clap and it immediately will be over), sooo it's more like we the observers force schrödingers cat to make a decision of how it wants to present itself to us while we try to keep a single moment in time within a picture, though there is just the flow. In my opinion it's better explained with a vector field of potential movement and velocity (acceleration) of these electrons moving in a vertex pattern around the core. This ultimately has something to do with the fundamental properties of prime numbers and I am writing papers on them (project them on a duodecimal (clock) system, and keep counting around the clock (1: 13, 25; 2: 14, 26...) then mark all the primes and you will also finde patterns like in the DNA.
@@RomanHold publish your theory smart sir
Antimatter is science fiction. It's a faulty theory that probably originates from radioactive decay and fission. Antimatter claims to produce massive amounts of energy when antimatter and matter interact. Same as fission, it causes matter to release huge amounts of energy (nuclear explosion, hydrogen bomb).
You can tell antimatter is science fiction. It explodes when it comes into contact with matter, supposedly. It should have all been annihilated then.
It also violates the law of conservation of energy, matter can not be destroyed.
That it explodes when it comes in contact with matter is just an idea, without any explanation. Like some alternate explanation for fission and radioactive decay.
@@RomanHold This is interesting, thank you for sharing. This is going to lead me down a rabbit hole for a long time. Just as you mentioned the observer, as an example with our body and consciousness some believe it is this self-awareness from the nature of attention to our body changes the very experience with and perception of it, which, inevitably, changes ourselves (Jonathan Gibson 2019).
🤓
Brian is one of the best Science communicators in the world, he helps make the complex within reach of anyone curious about Science
After watching this, I have only one question: what?
?tahw :noitseuq eno ylno evah I ,siht gnihctaw retfA
@@karlkarlsson9126he spitting facts
@@karlkarlsson9126 bro pulled out the antiquestion
@@karlkarlsson9126this shit goes hard
This video was beautiful.
What a beautiful piece of motion design.
Normies:
"iT's tHe uPsIdE-dOwN."
Strange!
to me, when it comes to time in the antimatter universe, it is a constant usage of killer queen's third bomb, bites the dust
That would be sick tbh
"Roses are red, matter is dead, I've told you: you should've gone for the head!"
Just brilliant
The fact that we exist in spite of the annihilation process might be due to the presence of the phase shift occurring between the anti particles. The quantum mechanics describes this phenomenon and might explain also the presence of time as we experience it.
I can only think of a theistic consultation for the antimatter matter relationship.
Somewhere in the universe there might exist a Brian anti Green, or Brian Pink for short
This is funny...because there actually is an anti-green particle. In quantum chromodynamics there is color charge. Red, Green, Blue. All three have a corresponding anti-particle: anti-red, anti-blue, and anti-green.
If when they annihilate, they release energy, and matter is energy, wouldn’t there still be something left after their annihilation?
Yes, when matter and antimatter annihilate, they release protons
Two photons in fact. There is also a process called a pair instability supernova where the star gets so hot that the gamma rays have so much energy they start forming electron-positron pairs. As a star depends on the gamma ray pressure to hold back gravity, without the gamma rays, the star collapses.
@@Fazzel why photons instead of anti photons
@@auto396 -- Photons have no anti-particle.
I've finally found it... The key to getting no downvotes is to upload content in antimatter.
You can only upload pure structure (information), not matter or antimatter. :)
beautiful vid, thanks
Please do more videos like this....
Excellent animation ❤❤❤
Question: How can an antiparticle travel through a cloud chamber? Are the bits of "cloud" not matter? Why doesn't the antiparticle annihilate with the matter?
Antimatters only annihilate its own counterpart. For example, positrons only "blow" themselves up if they come into contact with electrons. Otherwise they behave like ordinary matters with the rest of the universe. There's also a group of particle called the Mesons, which is made up of a pair of quark-antiquark of different flavours. In some cases, Mesons do make up of the same quark-antiquark pair (charm-anticharm for instant) but those have very short lifetime. The point is, it's possible for antimatters to interact with matters in a normal way, provided that they're not the exact "opposite" of one another.
so creating a positronic brain might not be such a great idea.
Brian Greene keeps me thinking :)
one of the best vids I have watched
It has been to our benefit that there is missing antimatter.
Very cool video. Is the narrator Brian Greene?
Yes
Does CP-violation not explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry? Even the LHCb recently found evidence of CP violation in case of D0 mesons.
What does that mean in layman's terms? All I know is CP violation has something to do with symmetry of particles or something like that.
Shouldn't regular matter be called pro-matter?
Could the universe be any other way than it is? Why anti-matter? Why dark matter? Why 3 families of particles? Well, the Dirac equation suggests that anti- matter is the logical mathematical consequence of quantum mechanics and special relativity.
I wish Brian Greene was my uncle. He seems like such a cool and interesting guy.
String theory is a scam like Michio Kaku .. Brian Green is a looser that never got that Nobel Prize in Physics he so desperately wants .. Maybe he should apply for the Nobel Prize on antisemitizm
I can't figure out why someone would downvote this video?
I f*ing hate anti matter!!! Those lil bastards! Haha
What if there is a whole dimension made purely of antimatter and just as we can make antimatter they can make matter?
Then this is technically Crisis from dc
In 3:20 it says to avoid annihilation there's an imbalance between matter and antimatter and that's why all we see today is matter, so how Carl Andersen take a picture of antimatter? Sorry maybe i just dont understand it clearly, can anyone dumb it down for me?😅
were doing animated clips now? i love it
What if the big bang came from a black hole or a white hole? Could the information stored be disbursed and rearranged? Could the imbalance be created from the split of information at the event horizon?
It's moments like this that make me want to learn the math behind these theories so I can work these thoughts out.
You dont need to learn math to understand any of this. If i ask you right now, what is matter? What would your answer be? Huh? What is MATTER? Youd likely tell me, everything is matter, every single thing. So, if anti matter is exactly like matter, what is anti matter????? What would your answer be then? Would you tell me, everything? That's fine, but where can we find this "anti everything"? Food for thought. Death is not The end of our existence.
🤓
I think the big bang is just the total death of the previous universe. Melodysheep made a video of the life of our universe and i totally believe that the end of our universe is a big bang for the next universe.
We're organism bounded by time. So this happens in a linear manner. But for a higher being, aka "god" this happen all at the same time. Aka 'multiverse'
If a black hole and a white hole collide, do they form a gray hole?
@@Fazzel they will never colide, if a black hole and white hole influence eachother they will stay in the same position forever unless external forces
I will aquire the relic of immortality and gain all the knowledge in the world until end
Anti-Monitor was here
If there's matter and anti-matter that when combined create energy couldn't there be energy and anti-energy...
and if they combine would they create matter?
This happens in a pair instability supernova. The gamma rays formed are so energetic that two gamma ray photons combine and form an electron and a positron.
GOD
dark matter keeps them apart
Bro which software you use to create vedios
The anti-entropy particle😮 and how we get rid of the silly Observer effect
Matter gives anti matter reflection.
Think every cell in our heart.
Maybe at the moment of the big bang, matter and antimatter preconditions were arranged as charged imbalances much like a ''pip" and "shell" within a nuclear warhead? As the initial universe rapidly expanded the antimatter charged area being the shell and the matter charged area being the pip, the antimatter is still out there, but expanding as an antimatter wave front beyond the CMB horizon? It would go a long way to solving the math problem if true?
Although, there is still a problem which seems to remain unanswered and that is of the nature of fully formed galaxies 13.3 billion light years in distance. If galaxies can be seen fully formed at 13.3 bil light years distant, then wouldn't it be correct to assume there was vast quantities of time before that moment when the photons left those galaxies which they needed to fully form as 13.3 billion year old galaxies? If I'm not mistaken, this leaves .5 billion years from the moment of the big bang for galaxies to fully form. If that is the case, then how is the observed distance between these early formed galaxies to be explained at the furthest points of observable distance across the entire cosmological background, given that we are so observably close to Andromeda locally?
i dont get it, if there is equal amount of protons but only 1 positive proton more than the negatives
what's that 1+ proton
God
If assuming every atom has an anti atom, we must assume there is an anti version of all of us somewhere else, no?
Yea but when do I get warp drive.
1:40 "If proven correct" hey wait a minute the subtitles say "incorrect." Just letting you know no offense. 😀
omg
its the anti subtitles
@@puddleduck1405 holy shit that made me explode
What if whenever we sleep and dream we are in our anti matter form
Good question? Spirit realm?
maybe there is alot of anti matter just not in our part of the universe. Ie, 2 universes might have collided creating BB where one was majority anti matter and one normal matter creating the CMB and leaving out the majority of anti matter
The universe is still expanding from the big bang, but eventually the expansion will stop and the antimatter will push it all back in a big crunch that will eventually bang again.
they dont annihilate, they explode. we dont understand charge well enough to really understand antimatter
Actually they just turn into gamma rays.
Its pretty simple really. Mankind discovered antimatter centuries ago, A child could do it at home (although we hope not), create fire. Harvesting antimatter is another question.
I tried so soft and got so near, but in the beginning, it does antimatter
You didn't tried so soft and don't got so near but in the beginning it does antimatter
Is Brian Greene voicing this vedio by any chance.?
I am pretty sure it's not by chance.
I never understand why the extra particle left after annihilation
Is this the voice of that guy who's been on Joe Rogan? Brian something I think
1% video 99% nonsense
Wdym
Nah 80 percent is video
Maybe the antimatter got pushed out of our visible univers and is moving faster/as fast as our matter universe is expanding....
do matters have antimatters but antimatters don't have matters? what if the antimatters had their own matters that cancelled their existence and the matters have other antimatters and so on cancelling each other's existence in an infinite way
TY 1
do black holes have antimatter?
Maybe
If matter can be destroyed then it's opposite antimatter cannot.
It isn't destroyed. Matter becomes energy by E=MC2
It's like saying I drive an anti car - it is so ridiculous.
Does anti matter?
Maybe not the smartest question of all but what if at the big bang there was a perfect 50-50 split and the huge ammount of energy realeased somehow created more matter than anti matter? or that's just simply impossible.
That's not a bad idea, but the question is from the energy released, how could you be sure that only matter would come and not antimatter?
What if there simply was no big bang.
So if 1,000,001 electrons annihilate 1,000,000 positrons and only 1 electron is left to exist, that is a lot of energy to be released. Did that cause the inflation of the universe?
This doesn't change your question, but I think they're saying 1,000,000 electrons annihilate 1,000,000 positrons. But there would have needed to be 1,000,001 electrons for every 1,000,000 positrons, so there would still be enough electrons left over to make the universe we see.
3:57 Perhaps we exist only in a simulation. That would explain things.
somebody said antimatter is ordinary matter traveling backwards in time (?)
It's a conundrum
you ain't lyin'
Imagine finding an anti-planet... the astronaut steps down and just poof there is an astronaut shaped hole in the planet now.
The rocket would go poof first. If the planet has an atmosphere the rocket wouldn't even make it to the ground.
maybe the expansion of the galaxy was driven by matter--antimatter combustion. Like if God played marbles with insies and outsies.
So basically theres ME and ANTI-ME ??
Chingon!
The opposite of uncle matter.
I just want to know if the antimatter me is evil, or if I am the evil version of me.
Everyone asks why there is something " matter"intsead of nothing .. the question is structurally wrong to ask thus we are among matter wich our senses are evoluted with it a matter wich is necessary containing us therefor we experience .. the nothing " antimatter or dark matter " is not within us nor containing our senses ، it have effects on the expa and of space and time dilatation and our cellular gray matter cannot comprehense the complexity on how simple it can be
And this cures cancer?
It can be used to detect cancer. That's what a PET scan uses. The P stands for positrons, Which is anti-matter. So while it won't cure cancer, it can be used to let the doctors know there is cancer and then they can treat the cancer.
Who created Anti matter ???
Physics has become a antimatter festival, everything is so imaginary that only equations can "prove", but what they prove? They're just equations, they're just more antimatter.
Almost Ted-Ed :)
Perhaps antimatter is hidden somewhere else in the universe!
There would be a front where the two meet and it would be producing a lot of energy. So far no such front has been detected.
We exist because 0+0=1
I thought it was because 10000000000000000000000000000000001 - 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 = 1
omg if this is true then i know wat it is !!!!!. it is 1 exsisting side and then the non exsistinge side so meaning there is a spirit world we cant se or touch .somting like that . the problem is solved. its not nonsens becors he say it him self we woud not exist and that is correct there is 1 existing and 1 non existing and we are in the existing side at the moment !!! only problem is how can we find out without being dead....
So I have an evil twin?
Alpha & Omega
May the antimatter scattered as a bubbles in small spaces and formed the blackholes ,,
May be Matter expands in to space , but antimatter schrink in to space ,, matter is going thinner with time , and antimatter goes denser with time ,
Why creation out of the empty space is required and why to maintain the rules of the particles and why to annihilate them unnecessarily???
I am eager to ask this question with the funny fellow "GOD".
I request everyone to share it to HIM...
THANKS...
GOD say, why not
Matter
And
Antimatter annihilate
That’s Crazy
Nonononononono....
Es que esto da risa. Es cierto, siempre hay dos polos.
Y lo chistoso es que puede incluso ser igual de complicado que la física cuántica.
Una infinidad de universos paralelos a cada uno.
Why matter and anti-matter destroyed? when they meet.
Think of two waves 90 degrees out of phase. When they meet they cancel. Particles are also waves. So one particle wave cancels the other particle wave.
There is no such thing as matter. Only energy frequency and vibration.
As above so below
Intellectual design period lmao.
wait so can you make anti gold? what would anti gold look like? what would a anti human look like?
It probably would look like ordinary gold. The positrons in the anti-gold would probably affect light the same way electrons do in regular gold. There are no anti-photons
I have a theory.
Dinosaurs are small at one end, big in the middle, and small at the other end.
There was no big bang
Did you know it was a Catholic Priest, Georges Lemaître, was who first came up with the idea of The Big Bang?
Who's seeing this after watching Ad Astra??
What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the universe!
Sqrt(4) = negative value (-2)?
Elementary mistake.
But, we got your point :)
Thanks for the video!
-2 * -2 still equals four?
Hang on I thought matter couldn’t be created or destroyed so how come when matter and anti matter meet each other they destroy each other
The turn into gamma rays by E=MC2. Basically matter becomes energy The two gamma rays have the same energy as the mass of the two particles.
@@Fazzel thanks ☺️
its very possible that for each universe their is a anti-universe. when matter from one universe goes to the other. Big Boom! its gone became energy again. from energy new universe born again
thank you very much from ALGERIA.
THE ONLY ONE TRUTH IS ALLAH CREATOR OF ALL.
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful (1)
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, (2) The Beneficent, the Merciful. (3) Owner of the Day of Judgment, (4) Thee (alone) we worship; Thee (alone) we ask for help. (5) Show us the straight path, (6) The path of those whom Thou hast favoured. Not (the path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray. (7)
How do you know it’s allah and not Jesus or god
Bunch of stupid peoples
Who cares what happened 13.8bn yrs ago? guys wake up were in the endgame now!
pls send me the ad revenue from this video i am broke as hell
This is good vs. evil?
Don't you get it.
God is real. Jesus is who he said.