Won't catch Matt daring to make any comment about his hero telling the world that he admires a dictator who murdered a British citizen on British Soil with nuclear poisoning. Matts patriotism is entirely political.
@@rdesign2753 There's a funny thing about people who say " think for yourself" is they are always the types who need to sit down before they try to think, If you think hard enough maybe you convince yourself those polonium attacks never happened, have a sit down 🤣
@@oisinocFarages comments were taken totally out of context, and this you know only too well. So thank you for contributing but first address that point before foaming.
Donald Trump entered White House as an ‘outsider’ and faced ‘no shortage of impediments’. This next time will be very, very different . . . Trump will win, but Congress must turn red too. Make it happen, or regret it for ever.
If we indigenous British are the majority in the UK, then it is us that should be pulling the strings and demanding that our government puts us first before others.
My grandson, early 20s, v left wing, and I spend our time discussing politics. We've agreed for years that our current (bonkers) political climate would provoke a major surge to the right. I'd have ten bob on Trump, we've all had enough of ideological nonsense, we need some grown-ups to start solving problems.
@joanware6473 seeing as the tories are the same as Labour there's not going to be much difference just more of the same policies that people have had enough of. When will they ever learn. Vote Reform, we badly need reform.
A populist is a person, especially a politician, who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups. Ya Nigel
@thechilliman1602 I have purchased all of Matt's books, I find that they are easy to read and comprehend. I think he has the knack of enabling the ordinary "man in the street" to understand what is happening in British politics. I do look forward to his podcasts.
Informed scrutiny and active enquiry and some intelligent debate instead of the garbage we get And since they are talking of hypocrisy, and Mr Faraj,, of all people accuses Boris Johnson of Hypocrisy, we might raise the subject in another connection because it is becoming clear that pundits, such as Peter Hitchens, and others of this absurd conglomeration of grievance, resentment, and calculated cynicism are not clear, and hence this this confusion that Peter Hitchins et alia have confused Science and Marxism and both with conspiracy. And let us start with saying what Marxism is, rather than their lurid imaginations would wish it to be as therapy for their neuroses and the ignorance. The thrust of Marxism is Education as a cure for 'alienation', and what is 'alienation'? It is the confusion that occurs when people do not understand their environment, or their society, and Revolution only occurs when the forces in power obstruct popular education. Marx held that Health and Education, diet and Science could,, if properly organised, create communities [Hence Communism] Not so terrifying is it when it is put thus? But Education for Marx was not simply 'lessons' It was not simply class rooms, it was the creation of Newspapers and [and now media] which provided them with reliable information and knowledge and access to expertise. [Shock horror Mr Gove. Experts rather than pundits like Peter Hitchins and Douglas Murray. Marx core philosophy was that provided with health and education the individual, note please 'The Individual', could achieve their full potential, could be liberated to have Ethics, and Aesthetics, could have time for creative hobbies. Thus it was that Thomas Mann said 'If only Schopenhauer had read Marx, or Marx had read Schopenhauer.' but that is a speculation we cannot indulge here. Science is enquiry. It can be pure Science, curiosity into the origin in of things, the real phenomenon. The organisation of Science today is such that we have international journals for every conceivable discipline. For my field of study for example there was a 'Need' a necessity to read Journals of Soil Science, Forestry, Biochemistry and Micro-Biology, Biochemistry, Ecology and Anthropology as well as Fresh Water Biology Together with sampling, which takes time, there is laboratory work, microscopy, the identification of species, there is a need to understand the nutrients and the behaviour of chemicals interacting on one another. So we do not invent, because our colleague survey, scrutinise and demand to be satisfied that our interpretation of data is statistically and Scientifically sound. This is done at Universities, Institutes, in journals that fill entire libraries. Our enquiries based on sound premises lead us to conclusions and some of those have direct application to Society and Community, 'standards', 'regulation' of pollutants, observation on how one set of circumstance create problems. Applied Science and applied Technology work together , so when a standard comes up for examination it is not in order to inconvenience society but to provide the data so they can be protected. So what would ask Peter Hitchins et alia is how is this to be arranged if not through government?, How is this to be enforced of the community if not by Law ? how is it to be financed if not by Taxation? It is at these points that The Civil Society, and Politics and Science interact. I resent the idea that this should be catalogued as 'Marxism', or 'Conspiracy' or anti Society, on the contrary it is designed and applied Science, with well intentioned government to protect the Community, to protect and enable the individual. It is not Conspiracy, it is concern, a wish to provide. Unless Peter Hitchins can provide evidence rather than assertions he would be better advised, for the benefit of society, not to talk about things he knows nothing about, And I would say to Mr Faraj and his rabble, that if their manifesto was as well researched as the standards and regulations incorporated into law by Treaties he would be rather better advised, and I would make on further point. If electorates took the trouble to read, and seek guidance, if they chose to elect people of calibre, if they were better judges of character, and integrity then politicians would need to answer informed questions with honest answers, and I cannot but remark that if politicians performed their tasks honestly as Scientists perform and inform, the world would not be in the mess it is. If politicians would forget their ideologies and placed the welfare of the entire community before ambition, before sectional interest then democracy works, when it is ad hoc prejudice on no information the result is the ignorance the promotes Reform and the ignorance that hails him as a second Jesus. We do our work and if pundits exercised scrutiny rather than mouthing neurotic fantasies we would not have hysteria.
" Quick reminder, that there is no upper limit to diversity. You'll just be endlessly told things are too White until you wake up one day to something between Mogadishu and Karachi". ~ Andrew Joyce, Occidental Observer
We must all vote according to our conscience. 'Tactical voting' won’t hack it, now, or ever . . . That the CONservative Party would be destroyed has to be the least of our worries. Not that UK should have the usual alternative; it's time to reform the voting system. Reform Party may not be much but, with threats to the UK, it’s our only sane choice.
Does anybody else think it's significant , that UK election is 4th July and US Presidential is 5th November both dates important in the other nation ! Jon UK
A view from the UK. You 2 really have to redefine this word 'Populism'. The dictionary says: 'a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups' Cannot this definition describe the most popular party? What are we calling 'Elite Groups'? In a political sense I feel it is doing a dis-service to people who want change and support the parties that agree with that. Using this word just cheapens the dissatisfaction voters are feeling that their concerns are not being listened to. So there why don't you call the Conservatives for example the 'ANTI Populists'. A popular party is the one that wins on ALL its manifesto. It is now being used by the 'establishment' pejoratively.
@@tonycooper4141 VOTE REFORM. Or on the other hand you could vote for a lefty nonce. It depends on what floats your boat really. What sort of future you want.
Matt, you need to find a different interviewer, someone who can manage to button his shirt, live without a ponytail and get to his point rather more swiftly.
That's right Matt, but I think it's going to be very close for Trump. Democrats, liberal republicans and American institutions are going to make it v.challenging for Trump.😮
That would be for "The American People" to decide. Half of them chose Biden and Co last time. Not a very bright bunch really, but many are realising their error . . .
@@EllieMaes-Grandad Well it's obviously "The American People" will have to decide, us in Britain and the rest of Europe can't make that decision for you?! 🙄 The question you need to ask yourself is did half of them choose Biden and Co, or were they chosen for them with the corrupt postal ballot system? Most postal ballot systems are open to abuse, here in Britain, France, etc. Another question is will all the American electorate be "The American People", particularly with the recent arrivals from south of the border,will they be allowed to vote and skew the outcome? Finally 'Not a very bright bunch really', don't dis your fellow Americans, they're a lot more astute and wily than most people of the world gives them credit for and they usually materialise their concerns with astute stoicism. 🤗🇺🇸
In July we will have perhaps our final opportunity to reject all the lunacies of LibLabCon. Vote as if survival depends on it, because it does! Tactical voting is choosing oblivion.
Thank you for tuning in, if you want to stay ahead of the curve subscribe to my Substack here www.mattgoodwin.org/p/somethings-happening-out-there
Matt put your name after the title so it goes viral easier
Thankyou Matt 🙏.
People are feeling the pendulum starting to swing .
Matthew Goodwin once again speaking common sense.
Won't catch Matt daring to make any comment about his hero telling the world that he admires a dictator who murdered a British citizen on British Soil with nuclear poisoning. Matts patriotism is entirely political.
@@oisinoclol ????
Yep, my advice keep taking the tablets.
@@oisinoc 😂, gullible, another one hooked by the rhetoric offered by the media.
Word of advice, try and think for yourself!
@@rdesign2753 There's a funny thing about people who say " think for yourself" is they are always the types who need to sit down before they try to think, If you think hard enough maybe you convince yourself those polonium attacks never happened, have a sit down 🤣
@@oisinocFarages comments were taken totally out of context, and this you know only too well.
So thank you for contributing but first address that point before foaming.
Vote REFORM🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Donald Trump entered White House as an ‘outsider’ and faced ‘no shortage of impediments’.
This next time will be very, very different . . .
Trump will win, but Congress must turn red too. Make it happen, or regret it for ever.
If we indigenous British are the majority in the UK, then it is us that should be pulling the strings and demanding that our government puts us first before others.
100%!
TRUMP 🇺🇸 2024 🇬🇧 FARAGE - MAKE BRITAIN AND AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! 🥳
My grandson, early 20s, v left wing, and I spend our time discussing politics. We've agreed for years that our current (bonkers) political climate would provoke a major surge to the right. I'd have ten bob on Trump, we've all had enough of ideological nonsense, we need some grown-ups to start solving problems.
I spent time discussing things with my neice and she is now a member of Reform, her daughtet will not shift from liebor
Trump grown up really not from waht he says !
@@joanware6473 Probably her daughter is more educated and has a higher IQ
@@alanmarr3323 I assumed my allusion to 'ten bob'' would have been a clue that I'm in UK. so your former president is not a candidate in our election.
@joanware6473 seeing as the tories are the same as Labour there's not going to be much difference just more of the same policies that people have had enough of. When will they ever learn. Vote Reform, we badly need reform.
Matt and douglas Murray are good friends thats great they talk the truth Vote REFORM
A populist is a person, especially a politician, who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.
Ya Nigel
Love Matt his is spot on
Thank you both. Truth speakers.
Lets get Sir Nigel in No 10. VotevReform 🇬🇧
What a fantastic trio!
We will win REFORM FOR ALL
The arrogant classes hate us. Am I wrong?
You're absolutely right.
You are right.
Matt is my favourite to watch he's on the money with what the normal people want
@thechilliman1602 I have purchased all of Matt's books, I find that they are easy to read and comprehend. I think he has the knack of enabling the ordinary "man in the street" to understand what is happening in British politics. I do look forward to his podcasts.
Trump for the White House , NIGEL and other Reform People into the House of Commons Vote Reform UK🗳👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇮🇱🇮🇱✝️✝️✡️✡️🩵🩵🩵☑️
👍🇬🇧🩵
Why don't people call the others globopopulists? World people, world citizen, United earth etc. Sounds like Globopopulism to me.
I like the term `citizens of nowhere`, that seems to sum them up nicely.
Nigel Farage and Reform UK 🇬🇧 - Yes!
Informed scrutiny and active enquiry
and some intelligent debate instead of the garbage we get
And since they are talking of hypocrisy, and Mr Faraj,, of all people accuses Boris Johnson of Hypocrisy, we might raise the subject in another connection because it is becoming clear that pundits, such as Peter Hitchens, and others of this absurd conglomeration of grievance, resentment, and calculated cynicism are not clear, and hence this this confusion that Peter Hitchins et alia have confused Science and Marxism and both with conspiracy. And let us start with saying what Marxism is, rather than their lurid imaginations would wish it to be as therapy for their neuroses and the ignorance.
The thrust of Marxism is Education as a cure for 'alienation', and what is 'alienation'? It is the confusion that occurs when people do not understand their environment, or their society, and Revolution only occurs when the forces in power obstruct popular education.
Marx held that Health and Education, diet and Science could,, if properly organised, create communities [Hence Communism] Not so terrifying is it when it is put thus?
But Education for Marx was not simply 'lessons' It was not simply class rooms, it was the creation of Newspapers and [and now media] which provided them with reliable information and knowledge and access to expertise. [Shock horror Mr Gove. Experts rather than pundits like Peter Hitchins and Douglas Murray. Marx core philosophy was that provided with health and education the individual, note please 'The Individual', could achieve their full potential, could be liberated to have Ethics, and Aesthetics, could have time for creative hobbies. Thus it was that Thomas Mann said 'If only Schopenhauer had read Marx, or Marx had read Schopenhauer.' but that is a speculation we cannot indulge here.
Science is enquiry. It can be pure Science, curiosity into the origin in of things, the real phenomenon. The organisation of Science today is such that we have international journals for every conceivable discipline. For my field of study for example there was a 'Need' a necessity to read Journals of Soil Science, Forestry, Biochemistry and Micro-Biology, Biochemistry, Ecology and Anthropology as well as Fresh Water Biology
Together with sampling, which takes time, there is laboratory work, microscopy, the identification of species, there is a need to understand the nutrients and the behaviour of chemicals interacting on one another. So we do not invent, because our colleague survey, scrutinise and demand to be satisfied that our interpretation of data is statistically and Scientifically sound. This is done at Universities, Institutes, in journals that fill entire libraries.
Our enquiries based on sound premises lead us to conclusions and some of those have direct application to Society and Community, 'standards', 'regulation' of pollutants, observation on how one set of circumstance create problems. Applied Science and applied Technology work together , so when a standard comes up for examination it is not in order to inconvenience society but to provide the data so they can be protected. So what would ask Peter Hitchins et alia is how is this to be arranged if not through government?, How is this to be enforced of the community if not by Law ? how is it to be financed if not by Taxation? It is at these points that The Civil Society, and Politics and Science interact. I resent the idea that this should be catalogued as 'Marxism', or 'Conspiracy' or anti Society, on the contrary it is designed and applied Science, with well intentioned government to protect the Community, to protect and enable the individual. It is not Conspiracy, it is concern, a wish to provide. Unless Peter Hitchins can provide evidence rather than assertions he would be better advised, for the benefit of society, not to talk about things he knows nothing about, And I would say to Mr Faraj and his rabble, that if their manifesto was as well researched as the standards and regulations incorporated into law by Treaties he would be rather better advised, and I would make on further point. If electorates took the trouble to read, and seek guidance, if they chose to elect people of calibre, if they were better judges of character, and integrity then politicians would need to answer informed questions with honest answers, and I cannot but remark that if politicians performed their tasks honestly as Scientists perform and inform, the world would not be in the mess it is. If politicians would forget their ideologies and placed the welfare of the entire community before ambition, before sectional interest then democracy works, when it is ad hoc prejudice on no information the result is the ignorance the promotes Reform and the ignorance that hails him as a second Jesus. We do our work and if pundits exercised scrutiny rather than mouthing neurotic fantasies we would not have hysteria.
Trump for USA Farage for UK.
What a team that would be. Imagine the liberal tears!!!!
And not a thing will change...
You area cretin.
TikTok count down to revolution
" Quick reminder, that there is no upper limit to diversity.
You'll just be endlessly told things are too White until you wake up one day to something between Mogadishu and Karachi".
~ Andrew Joyce, Occidental Observer
MAGA.
It feels like we're actually living in a Lord of the Rings film....awaiting a wise man to help us take back the shires.
Vote reform
what a trifecta it would be if we had trump,farage and lepenn in power we see some real change finally.
🙏❤️🇳🇿
Already voted Reform by post
Vote reform
Great news for the benefactor of all populist groups Mr Putin!
We must all vote according to our conscience.
'Tactical voting' won’t hack it, now, or ever . . .
That the CONservative Party would be destroyed has to be the least of our worries.
Not that UK should have the usual alternative; it's time to reform the voting system.
Reform Party may not be much but, with threats to the UK, it’s our only sane choice.
The Uniparty globalists will do all they can to smear Nigel, but he’s too strong for them!
The Uniparty globalists will do all they can to smear Nigel, but he’s too strong for them!
The Uniparty globalists will do all they can to smear Nigel, but he’s too strong for them!
The Uniparty globalists will do all they can to smear Nigel, but he’s too strong for them!
Does anybody else think it's significant , that UK election is 4th July and US Presidential is 5th November both dates important in the other nation !
Jon UK
Sure, Independence Day for us Americans 🇺🇸. And Freedom Day for Great Britain 🇬🇧! This is the beginning of our return to normalcy.
A view from the UK. You 2 really have to redefine this word 'Populism'. The dictionary says:
'a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups'
Cannot this definition describe the most popular party? What are we calling 'Elite Groups'? In a political sense I feel it is doing a dis-service to people who want change and support the parties that agree with that. Using this word just cheapens the dissatisfaction voters are feeling that their concerns are not being listened to. So there why don't you call the Conservatives for example the 'ANTI Populists'. A popular party is the one that wins on ALL its manifesto. It is now being used by the 'establishment' pejoratively.
Ideologically aligned people in key positions , what the Conservatives failed to do by design or omission
Watch Andrew Bridgen’s latest interview to see what has really been going on.
The economy is not okay, inflation is crazy, 3 years ago something that cost me 6 dollars now costs 17 dollars. Money is approaching uselessness.
All part of the plan. Banks fail. Government charge in to save us. Digital currency for all. Control
Orange Man Rad ✊
Farage Man Orange!
@@tonycooper4141
VOTE REFORM.
Or on the other hand you could vote for a lefty nonce.
It depends on what floats your boat really.
What sort of future you want.
Was Mccarthy right?
I do hope all three happen!!
Matt, you need to find a different interviewer, someone who can manage to button his shirt, live without a ponytail and get to his point rather more swiftly.
He is too sexy for his shirt. HaHa
That's right Matt, but I think it's going to be very close for Trump. Democrats, liberal republicans and American institutions are going to make it v.challenging for Trump.😮
That would be for "The American People" to decide. Half of them chose Biden and Co last time. Not a very bright bunch really, but many are realising their error . . .
@@EllieMaes-Grandad Well it's obviously "The American People" will have to decide, us in Britain and the rest of Europe can't make that decision for you?! 🙄 The question you need to ask yourself is did half of them choose Biden and Co, or were they chosen for them with the corrupt postal ballot system? Most postal ballot systems are open to abuse, here in Britain, France, etc. Another question is will all the American electorate be "The American People", particularly with the recent arrivals from south of the border,will they be allowed to vote and skew the outcome? Finally 'Not a very bright bunch really', don't dis your fellow Americans, they're a lot more astute and wily than most people of the world gives them credit for and they usually materialise their concerns with astute stoicism. 🤗🇺🇸
Excuse me? No they did not vote for Biden. There vote was gerrymandered by widespread fraud. And saying Americans are not bright, is ridiculous.
Not bright bunch?! What a ridiculous comment. American voters had fault perpetrated on them by gerrymandering votes! Wise up.
The absurd Ann Applebaum long ago made the wrong decision after some good early work- a waste of good oxygen, yet takes herself so seriously!
An absolutely fantastic comment.
‘Populist’ is the term used to disparage a perfectly sound democratic trend or outcome.
Just more people wanting a free pony from the government.
Nice to see meloni isn't included in the picture!
On the radicicalisation of the elites, have you read Charles Murray's Coming Apart - The State of White America 1960-2010?
excuse me...if they are populist, why is their vote count in the minority?
Voters are waking up; slowly at present, then all at once.
Reminds me of that old comedy trio the three stooges, only without the humour.
In July we will have perhaps our final opportunity to reject all the lunacies of LibLabCon.
Vote as if survival depends on it, because it does! Tactical voting is choosing oblivion.
Reform UK is the only option for me. 🇬🇧🩵