The Excel Functions Almost Everyone Overlooks (Better Than SUMIFS)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 209

  • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
    @MyOnlineTrainingHub  29 дней назад +5

    ❓Have you tried database functions before, or are they still on your "to-learn" list?
    Learn more about the Advanced Excel Formulas course: bit.ly/dfunctions24course
    Master Excel with my courses: bit.ly/dfunctions24courses

  • @MissPickles1980
    @MissPickles1980 26 дней назад +25

    OMG! I've always been put off database functions because I've never been shown how to use them properly. This is an absolute gamechanger!

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +3

      Awesome to hear you'll be making use of them 😁

    • @ricjrob
      @ricjrob 11 дней назад

      Same here. This is now going to be my go to.

  • @ertertrert
    @ertertrert 23 дня назад +1

    Not often I watch a video about something I've never come across these days, and something so powerful too - thank you!!

  • @fordfactor
    @fordfactor 24 дня назад +3

    Hi Myna. Excellent video on these "hidden" functions. One thing I like with these is that in the criteria, you can make a "calculated" criteria, which allows you to use ALL of Excel's logical functionality (AND, OR, XOR, EXACT, ISBLANK etc.) in an excel formula.
    You make a new arbitrary criteria column, then in the cell below do a standard Excel logical test as if you were doing it for the first row of data and you were going to fill it down like a normal formula.

  • @TakeonmeLiive
    @TakeonmeLiive 8 дней назад

    Thank you for this!!! The dbase functions in Excel have an incredibly powerful use case. Your channel is amazing for not just uncovering the new (I'm on 2019) but the old that everyone can benefit!. A most powerful jedi you are.

  • @DingusBatus
    @DingusBatus 26 дней назад +4

    I’ve seen the database functions listed in the intellisense as I start typing in other functions but knew nothing about them.
    I didn’t even know they were called database functions, I just saw DSUM and DMAX and so on.
    I’ve learned something new, and very interesting today. Thank you.😍

  • @junejaundoo3827
    @junejaundoo3827 24 дня назад

    Madam! You just read my mind and have made my life so much easier! Grateful for you showing me that this doesn’t have to be intimidating. I have so many uses for this in my day to day work. Thank you very much 👌🏽🙏🏼

  • @chrism9037
    @chrism9037 26 дней назад +2

    Excellent info Mynda! I rarely use the Dbase functions and need to start using them more often, very helpful!

  • @ianpaulkenchington4311
    @ianpaulkenchington4311 26 дней назад +1

    ok, I had been going hard at array functions to make complex criteria and this streamlines everything so nicely! Great video!

  • @ankursharma6157
    @ankursharma6157 25 дней назад +1

    Thank You!
    1. Inspired from Your video . . I was exploring the DGET function . . and found, it can also get the value from a column on the left . . WoW!
    2. In these functions, the way We write the criteria reminded Me of Advanced Filter.
    Best Wishes!

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад +1

      Awesome to hear! Yes, very similar to Advanced Filter. They are of the same era 😉

  • @martinargimon730
    @martinargimon730 25 дней назад

    Hi mynda. I’ve been using these ‘D’databsse function for a long time now, since I use ‘Power Pivot’ ( related tables a lot) and hence database functions are thff re best. Thanks fog introducing these functions to the rest of your subscribers. Kind regards. Martin ( South Africa). 😊

  • @brighttriangle
    @brighttriangle 26 дней назад

    This is a terrific introduction to Excel's powerful and versatile database functions. Thank you for sharing, as always!

  • @yokoyama7590
    @yokoyama7590 26 дней назад +2

    I learned something new today! Great video Mynda!

  • @chriswagner8495
    @chriswagner8495 26 дней назад +3

    I cut my spreadsheet teeth on these database functions when I first learned Lotus 1-2-3 (showing my age here). So, I have a special place in my heart for them. However, I have found that if you use Excel's array functions (Control, Shift, Enter) with SUMIFS (and its variants COUNTIFS, MAXIFS, etc.) you can set up OR situations (within curly brackets { }) that work quite nicely.

  • @thebesttechnical3608
    @thebesttechnical3608 12 часов назад

    Excellent documentation with the installation steps .Thanks a lot

  • @56Nine
    @56Nine 26 дней назад +2

    I wish I could give you hundreds of thumbs up!!! Thank you for the video; this will come in very handy, thank you for making the video!

  • @hado-hado
    @hado-hado 23 дня назад

    Through this video I have learned great formulas, thank you very much

  • @leovangiessen5507
    @leovangiessen5507 21 день назад

    Thanks alot! It helps me in a very positive way! Keep up the good work!❤

  • @alexrosen8762
    @alexrosen8762 26 дней назад

    Excellent function which I started using at work after your first tutorial on this function about 3 years ago ❤🙏❤

  • @davegoodo3603
    @davegoodo3603 24 дня назад

    Fantastic video Mynda, great content! Thank you.

  • @vidyabhushankumar5361
    @vidyabhushankumar5361 26 дней назад

    This is really a hidden gem. Thanks for revealing it 👏

  • @RobMustard01
    @RobMustard01 16 дней назад

    These database functions (and Tables, in general), are amazing! Thank you for putting the spotlight on them.
    I have a worksheet that I thought would become a lot easier with these, but I'm stumped on the approach. My "raw data" rows have Month and Year columns. The Month column is filled with a "mmm" mask in the TEXT formula. Similarly, the Year column is created with the YEAR function from the original date column. I don't have an array of adjacent cells with 27x12 year and month values! How do I define the CRITERIA parameter of the DSUM function with some sort of literal YEAR:2023 MONTH:6 combination?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  16 дней назад

      Because the month is a month name in text form, I would define the criteria based on the date column, not the separate year and month columns as per my examples.

  • @eroteam2
    @eroteam2 26 дней назад

    thank you for the content ^^
    I usually do it with filter and average or filter with sum, but I enjoyed to learn about this formula, thank you ^^

  • @ScrtAznMann
    @ScrtAznMann 26 дней назад

    Excellent video. I always wondered why and when I’d use these formulas.

  • @roywilson9580
    @roywilson9580 22 дня назад +1

    I have always found these D functions to be amongst the most useful in Excel. When I was working as an IT tutor I always presented the D functions immediately after the advanced filter function as the syntax is so similar. Unfortunately using these functions often renders the spreadsheet no-editable by anyone who may inherit the spreadsheet from you as very few people seem to have a good grounding in the basics of Excel these days.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  22 дня назад

      Yes, I guess like everything, there is a learning curve with these functions. I think they're easier to learn than SUMIFS because the syntax is so basic, and the criteria are transparent.

    • @roywilson9580
      @roywilson9580 21 день назад +1

      @MyOnlineTrainingHub I totally agree but they rarely seem to be used or known about. Hopefully your excellent video will help make them more popular.

  • @sideshowbobby71
    @sideshowbobby71 25 дней назад

    Great video! Great breakdown. Thank you.

  • @jasonmorin8894
    @jasonmorin8894 26 дней назад

    Good stuff. With the intro of tables, D functions are little more easy to follow. I didn’t know SUMIFs could not handle OR because I’m old school and SUM(IF array functions and SUMPRODUCT can handle OR.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +1

      Thank you! Yes, SUM(IF and SUMPRODUCT are other handy ways to handle OR criteria. Thanks for sharing.

  • @riteshzope3672
    @riteshzope3672 26 дней назад

    Thank you very much for sharing such a powerful Functions.
    It will definitely going to help
    Thanks a lot ..

  • @ActuallyWooolin
    @ActuallyWooolin 12 дней назад

    Sounds amazing. Did you by any chance tested the performance and speed compared to sumifs? Is it faster and if yes, then is it substantial?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  11 дней назад

      It's comparable to SUMIFS. I've got a video on it coming out soon.

  • @HandelMcHandel
    @HandelMcHandel 25 дней назад

    Another great video Mynda!

  • @janwijninckx3598
    @janwijninckx3598 26 дней назад +3

    The reasons not to use the D*() functions is that they are slow, and can yield very complex unintended results from using the criteria range. Sumifs are straight forward and much faster. Still, kinda cute to see these old lotus 123 functions again

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад +1

      Thanks for sharing, Jan! I think they're good for beginners because the syntax is simple, and the criteria table is transparent...and most beginners aren't working with huge datasets.

    • @robertmatthews4285
      @robertmatthews4285 15 дней назад

      ⁠@@MyOnlineTrainingHub Not sure why you think database functions are better than the sumifs, countifs, averageifs, minifs, maxifs etc functions. Database functions are incredibly slow and are all but non-usable on very large datasets if you use complex criteria. The ifs functions are just as easy to understand as the database functions and much faster. If you have criteria too complex for an ifs functions or an aggregate function that is not available in an ifs format, I’d use filter and then use the aggregate function on the filtered results before using database functions. I don’t think I’ve used a database function in 15 years. I consider them deprecated functionality that has been left in for no other purpose than backward compatibility.

  • @GodAdministrator
    @GodAdministrator 14 дней назад +1

    Hm....looks nice... The only thing is that you have to have special section of sheet to handle criteria while most of the time you use sumif in structured reports. If you need fast calculation for your own pivot will be better in most cases

  • @greenview4868
    @greenview4868 23 дня назад

    All your videos are of advance level which will take a few months to learn. Can you provide a site for freelance work for basic excel? Apart from fiver.. detail video, how to get it? how to apply.. any data collected from Google.

  • @vgupta4760
    @vgupta4760 26 дней назад

    Wow and amazing! Thanks a ton for this video!

  • @emileelynette3158
    @emileelynette3158 26 дней назад

    This is so awesome, thank you!

  • @matsoj63
    @matsoj63 24 дня назад

    I have checked it yesterday. It speed up my report a lot.

  • @santoshdevadula5071
    @santoshdevadula5071 26 дней назад +1

    Advance filter will be a great option to return multiple values based on criteria.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      Yes, Advanced Filter is great for one off extractions. Alternatively, if you need a more dynamic solution, you can use the FILTER function: www.myonlinetraininghub.com/excel-functions/excel-filter-function

  • @mjbah
    @mjbah 26 дней назад

    Many thanks for these videos.
    I presume all the 'database' functions need a 'criteria range' (which includes the columns and values) for the criteria part of the function unlike the counterpart functions where the criteria can be embedded in the function. It's like using the Advance Filter in Excel (with criteria and output range).

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +1

      Yes, they all need the criteria range. It is very similar to advanced filter, except because it's a formula, it updates immediately if there are changes in the source or critieria table.

    • @roryarchibald8538
      @roryarchibald8538 25 дней назад

      @@MyOnlineTrainingHub and the criteria work the same way as the advanced filter ones, which means that text criteria are "begins with" by default, so "B" would have returned the same results as "B*" and all the "Level 1" filters would have matched "Level 10", "Level 11", "Level 100" etc had they been in the data. It also means that you can use formula criteria which can be much simpler to set up when you have multiple AND/OR combinations.

  • @Rice0987
    @Rice0987 26 дней назад

    At start of my excel carier I was using these function, but lately I've found more simple sums and others.😁

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +1

      Great to hear you're using the more modern functions too.

  • @vramarathnam
    @vramarathnam 26 дней назад

    Thank You Very Much. Excellent

  • @abrahamj2600
    @abrahamj2600 26 дней назад

    @MyOnlineTrainingHub, 9:10, is it possible, then to use the column name each time instead of using the field name? Ex. "5" versus "Amount"? Great video and explanation on how to use this formula! Thank you!

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      Yes, you can use the column number or the column name, whichever you prefer. Of course, the name will make formula auditing easier when you come back to it months down the track and wonder what the formula does 😁

  • @xcver
    @xcver 9 дней назад

    The name tells you really what really should happen. This data should not be in a spreadsheet, but in a real Database

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  9 дней назад +1

      Not really...sure in some cases, but for single tables of data, a database is overkill.

    • @xcver
      @xcver 8 дней назад +1

      Sure, but then I do not really need these functions. Neat if I can, but also unnecessary for most applications. Also if you have access to a standing SQL database or python, creating a database is a matter of minutes.

  • @brianwied3702
    @brianwied3702 26 дней назад

    Very helpful as always, I'm afraid to reflect on how much time I wasted before knowing these kinds of functions.

  • @sahralsahri7180
    @sahralsahri7180 20 дней назад

    Great 👍 thanks!

  • @davidnam79
    @davidnam79 22 дня назад

    Nice video explanation but,
    SUMIFS is generally more CPU and memory-efficient compared to DSUM. Here's why:
    1. Performance Considerations
    SUMIFS:
    It directly processes data using ranges and built-in criteria within a formula, which minimizes the need for intermediate steps or complex calculations.
    Typically faster and more efficient, especially for large datasets, as it uses optimized algorithms for conditional summation.
    DSUM:
    Requires a separate criteria range, which can add complexity and overhead in terms of calculation.
    Uses a database-like approach, which may be less efficient for summing operations if your data isn’t in a structured table format or if your criteria are complex.
    2. Memory Usage
    SUMIFS: More efficient in memory usage since it processes data in a streamlined manner without additional data structures.
    DSUM: Can consume more memory because it might have to interpret and handle a larger set of structured data and criteria separately.
    For large datasets or when performance is a priority, SUMIFS is generally more efficient. It is more commonly used in Excel spreadsheets for better calculation speed and lower memory usage. DSUM is more appropriate for cases where you are working with structured database-like tables and need to apply complex criteria, but it may not perform as well in terms of CPU and memory efficiency.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  22 дня назад +1

      Thanks, David! You raise some interesting points, so I did some speed tests on 110k rows of data with 3 criteria and the results showed SUMIFS is 11% faster than DSUM, but both are lightning fast:
      First Calc:
      DSUM 10.05 milliseconds
      SUMIFS 9.166 milliseconds
      Recalc:
      DSUM 0.014 milliseconds
      SUMIFS 0.013 milliseconds
      That's a calc time of around 0.01 of a second for both formulas. Based on this, I think it's fair to say you can use whichever function you're comfortable with.

  • @nadermounir8228
    @nadermounir8228 26 дней назад

    Very nice Video thank you for your hard work

  • @henrypraise4873
    @henrypraise4873 26 дней назад

    Simply Awesome

  • @JulianFernandez
    @JulianFernandez 25 дней назад

    thank you, you wise and beautiful lady.

  • @mohammadalbizri2013
    @mohammadalbizri2013 25 дней назад

    Highly aprreciated

  • @fransvanderwerf7485
    @fransvanderwerf7485 26 дней назад

    My Excel super star !

  • @plucks86
    @plucks86 22 дня назад

    Do you have a video with the conditional formatting to produce the other formulas automatically?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  22 дня назад

      If you download the example file you can see how I set it up. It's just hiding the text with a white font until there is a value in the DSUM formula cell. e.g. =ISBLANK(DSUM formula cell reference)

  • @andrewtrayna
    @andrewtrayna 25 дней назад

    Do database functions preserve text identities? For example with leading zeroes, are the following treated uniquely: 1, 01, 001?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад

      Yes, as long as they're entered as text, they'll be treated as text.

  • @tscharlton
    @tscharlton 26 дней назад

    I went down a long rabbit hole trying to use DSUM and getting no where only to find out that DSUM is apparently not yet fully supported on a Mac. It would be helpful if you could provide some warning if/when there are limitation of Excel functions when using a Mac.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад

      What makes you think these functions aren't fully supported? I'm not aware of any issues with them for Mac Excel.

  • @DummyUrD
    @DummyUrD 26 дней назад

    If you need all results individuelly for the which Dget or xlookup cant give you, you can use the Filter function and create a dynamic table :)

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      Yes! I love the FILTER function for exactly this: www.myonlinetraininghub.com/excel-functions/excel-filter-function

  • @chahineatallah2636
    @chahineatallah2636 25 дней назад

    Yes I agree , it’s easier to use than sumifs, but still frankly am used to sumifs, it comes to my mind first 😀

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад

      By all means, use what you're comfortable with. These are great functions for beginners because the syntax is straightforward, and the criteria are transparent.

  • @HazirSMalik
    @HazirSMalik 4 дня назад

    What if I want to stack multiple tables in this formula?
    For example, I want to reference 2 Tables in my database Range. I have tried AND/OR/VSTACK but non of them are working.
    Use case: I want to be able to achieve below:
    Sheet 1 - Table 1: More than Million Rows
    Sheet 2 - Table 2: More than Million Rows
    I would like to reference both Tables so that I end up pulling data from both tables using this function once.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  4 дня назад

      If you're dealing with > 2 million rows, then you should be using Power Query to get the data from wherever it is stored (preferably not in the current file), consolidate it into one table, and then load it to Power Pivot aka the data model. See my latest video: ruclips.net/video/JvnezVM2uP4/видео.html

  • @jefffox8991
    @jefffox8991 22 дня назад

    How do you set the criteria without using a criteria table?
    I have a list of items in col A, then use a Unique formula to get column headers across row 1. How do i set the dsum to use the value from col A (Activity) and the value from row 1 (date). The sum column is Duration.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  21 день назад

      These functions require the criteria table. There's no workaround. You'd therefore be better off using SUMIFS.

  • @rajeshmajumdar4999
    @rajeshmajumdar4999 26 дней назад

    Thank you so much !

  • @vikaasb2016
    @vikaasb2016 26 дней назад +1

    Probably, the best 😊

  • @qingqing7400
    @qingqing7400 25 дней назад

    Thanks Mynda.🙏😊

  • @remediationdepartment4332
    @remediationdepartment4332 25 дней назад

    wow what amazing video, love it, than you

  • @arpwable
    @arpwable 25 дней назад

    Do the criteria ranges have to be hard-coded in somewhere, or could they be built within a database formula, e.g. by some HSTACKing/VSTACKing?

  • @CalebRice
    @CalebRice 25 дней назад

    Just saved me hours of work

  • @rubyal9045
    @rubyal9045 24 дня назад

    Wow, thanks for sharing. And I thought I’m an expert in Excel, but looks like I’m not 😂😂

  • @kkabc1886
    @kkabc1886 18 дней назад

    So coool!❤

  • @Rose-xc7wz
    @Rose-xc7wz 21 день назад

    What versions of Excel are these functions available for?

  • @milind_joshi
    @milind_joshi 26 дней назад +1

    I am more interested to see how you did that conditional formatting

    • @IsMirDochLattens
      @IsMirDochLattens 26 дней назад

      Use the custom formula for conditional formatting, set the font color to the cell background color (white in this case) and set the formula to =$A$1="" or =isempty($A$1) if A1 is the cell you fill manually. Of course you can use other criteria as well.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      @milind_joshi what @IsMirDochLattens said. Or you can download the example file and see how I set it up.

    • @shannonclark5371
      @shannonclark5371 24 дня назад

      This is so much easier; so well explained! Thanks 😊

    • @milind_joshi
      @milind_joshi 24 дня назад

      @@IsMirDochLattens thanks but isempty not working

    • @IsMirDochLattens
      @IsMirDochLattens 24 дня назад

      @@milind_joshisorry I just translated from my language. If Excel is set to English it actually is "ISBLANK" and not "ISEMPTY". If you use a different language you might have to look it up.

  • @hamzaabdullahmoh
    @hamzaabdullahmoh 5 дней назад

    Thank you.

  • @leekheekhoon9684
    @leekheekhoon9684 25 дней назад

    Excellent

  • @Qasim448
    @Qasim448 25 дней назад

    Wow. This is dope

  • @vinodvinu9605
    @vinodvinu9605 25 дней назад

    Can I know how u created the table that you showed for multiple criteria with all the employees data.

  • @susansees
    @susansees 25 дней назад

    I used these in lotus 123 to build dashboards in the 90s!

  • @abdualiomar
    @abdualiomar 22 дня назад

    I tried the DSUM function in a table with Total Row activated, but when I filtered the table, the DSUM messed up and gave a wrong result by adding the value to the Total Row as well.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  22 дня назад

      If you use the Table structured references in your DSUM it should never include the total row.

  • @scotolivera8207
    @scotolivera8207 26 дней назад

    can this be applied on data that id located in another closed workbook?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      No, you would need to open the workbook being referenced for it to calculate.

  • @laggytim
    @laggytim 26 дней назад

    2hours ago this would have saved me an hour of sum products!

  • @9029710280
    @9029710280 26 дней назад

    Does this work with horizontal data?

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад

      It doesn't. It's designed to work with data in a tabular layout.

  • @petr6617
    @petr6617 26 дней назад +2

    I'm afraid, Mynda, you're trying to resurrect a zombie 🙂
    a) The functions are not database functions (the name is historical, a bit ridiculous nowadays, bad even in English, not to mention the translations)
    b) Their parameters are inconsistent with modern structured Tables.
    c) Have you tested to what extent these functions are optimized for processing large amounts of data?
    d) For example, DGET has an improperly handled condition where there are multiple occurrences of a value in the table.
    e) In terms of topic continuity, yes, these functions follow the advanced filter, and I acknowledge they have an advantage there.

  • @warrenanderson412
    @warrenanderson412 26 дней назад

    Very nice

  • @roronoa646
    @roronoa646 16 дней назад

    Wait, slicers can provide that info right instead of using a function? or am I wrong.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  16 дней назад +1

      I suppose, kind of. Greater than and less than filters would require you to select a lot of date items in the Slicers. It all depends on the level of granularity as to whether Slicers will be user friendly.

    • @roronoa646
      @roronoa646 15 дней назад +1

      @MyOnlineTrainingHub okay, got it. Thanks

  • @Lakhwinder007-g3u
    @Lakhwinder007-g3u 16 дней назад

    None of your links given in the description are working. I have tried opening them multiple times.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  16 дней назад

      Sorry to hear that. I just tested them and they work for me. Please reach out via email and we can help you further: website @MyOnlineTrainingHub.com (remove the space after 'website')

  • @JJ_TheGreat
    @JJ_TheGreat 26 дней назад

    2:11 Is there a DMEDIAN()?
    Thanks.

  • @JJ_TheGreat
    @JJ_TheGreat 26 дней назад +1

    3:11 So the criteria is similar to Advanced Filtering!

  • @chrismoule7242
    @chrismoule7242 26 дней назад +5

    Excellent vid. Just to note, "data" and "criteria" are both plurals. "Data are", and "criteria are". "One datum", "one criterion".

    • @UsmanAfzal-h1s
      @UsmanAfzal-h1s 26 дней назад +6

      Unnecessary to point out

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +7

      Cheers, Chris. I agree regarding data and criteria. However, these days Microsoft use ''criteria' for one or multiple criteria, so I go with that most of the time too. I don't recall saying 'data are'. I usually say, 'data is'.

    • @chrismoule7242
      @chrismoule7242 25 дней назад

      @@UsmanAfzal-h1s When is it EVER "unneccessary" to remind people of correct English usage? That way, people might learn. Never mention it? No-one learns...

    • @philipnorrmann9184
      @philipnorrmann9184 20 часов назад

      ​@@chrismoule7242 what an ass you are 😅😅😅

  • @RA-rh5lb
    @RA-rh5lb 24 дня назад

    What is limitations of sumifs or other ifs

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  24 дня назад +1

      They cannot handle OR criteria. All criteria in the 'IFS functions are treated as AND.

    • @RA-rh5lb
      @RA-rh5lb 23 дня назад

      @@MyOnlineTrainingHub , Do you have any videos on the IFS function where you used OR but the system has treated it as AND? I am truly confused about this topic. Could you please help? or some notes where i can go through and understand the logic

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  21 день назад +1

      I wasn't referring to SUMIFS and the other 'IFS FUNCTIONS. I was referring to the 'IFS group of functions as in SUMIFS, AVERAGEIFS, MAXIFS, MINIFS etc. Sorry if this wasn't clear.

  • @ennykraft
    @ennykraft 25 дней назад

    Unfortunately the database function can only handle single cells. You can't drag them down for other levels. The day they released FILTER I stopped using them.

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  25 дней назад

      If you want to summarise the data by levels, then PivotTables are probably best, but FILTER is also useful, or the new GROUPBY and PIVOTBY functions.

  • @richardhay645
    @richardhay645 23 дня назад +1

    SUM(FILTER)

  • @hyperadapted
    @hyperadapted 26 дней назад

    at this point just use python environment in excel and pandas to filter and describe data

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +2

      Sure, if you have Python and the skills. 👍

    • @adamnealis
      @adamnealis 25 дней назад

      Python is a PITA, and for complex queries, pandas is too.

    • @hyperadapted
      @hyperadapted 25 дней назад

      @@adamnealis no its not

    • @adamnealis
      @adamnealis 25 дней назад

      @hyperadapted yes it is... It's subjective.

    • @hyperadapted
      @hyperadapted 25 дней назад

      @ for me it’s not. See, pointless argument

  • @NagyElAlfy-v7v
    @NagyElAlfy-v7v 26 дней назад

    👍

  • @mathijs9365
    @mathijs9365 15 дней назад

    Just use the filter....

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  14 дней назад

      That's ok, if you only want one set of conditions, but if you want multiple, then the database functions are a great alternative.

  • @syedtahirbukhari8377
    @syedtahirbukhari8377 26 дней назад

    Its not clear vedio

  • @1973HenkY
    @1973HenkY 26 дней назад +2

    Your dates are not formatted 'wonky' but 'correctly'. Day/month/year should be mandatory. IMNSHO.

    • @hyperadapted
      @hyperadapted 26 дней назад

      why not so humble? :D

    • @MyOnlineTrainingHub
      @MyOnlineTrainingHub  26 дней назад +2

      I agree, dd/mm/yyyy should be mandatory 😁

    • @adamnealis
      @adamnealis 25 дней назад

      Excel's handling of dates is and always has been awful.

    • @1973HenkY
      @1973HenkY 25 дней назад

      @@adamnealis Excel's handling of dates is a human rights violation if you ask me at the wrong time. My colleagues smile on a regular basis when my biweekly rant about k#lling 100's of MS programmers for their basic failures happens. After 30 years they still have not mastered a copy of word perfect 5.1 level 'underwater screen' with all the formatting/codes/styles in a simple overview.

  • @바개-h3m
    @바개-h3m 19 дней назад

    no good