Invisible stump in LCX,LCX Angioplasty

[@doctorcardio3886]

Plaque present in proximal lcx before the proximal stent
Single stent to cover the tight lesion in lcx (after the om) would have been enough

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes sir correct

[@kashifalikhan2535]

Good! you picked that LCX occlusion. could have been easily missed.

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes sir

[@doccardione]

This 'invisible' stump problem is seen very commonly with LCx in my practice

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes sir ..

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes sir..

[@sarge5000]

Pretty clearly visible on the first shot

[@RA-yo7pq]

@@sarge5000 ohk.

[@Docsammy]

Not sure why you stented distal. The plaque rupture is proximal where the stump was. The rest was spasm.

[@RA-yo7pq]

There was lesion in distally also..it was full of thrombus there also..

[@Worldlackscommonsense]

Agree. Would have just stented prox. Hate putting 2.5 stents. But great case.

[@mohammedwasifazam671]

Stent overlap could have been away from origin of PLVB either proximally or distally

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes sir

[@ubaidullahkhan4041]

Inject Buble in lad

[@rahulkumar-is4rf]

U have jailed a major om

[@RA-yo7pq]

Yes

[@Worldlackscommonsense]

Right strategy. It’s moderate sized.

[@rogeriomoura6557]

NOT IS NECESSARY PUT TWO STENTS. SORRY. ABSENT EXPERIENCE.