EcoloBlue 400,000 Liter/Day Atmospheric Water Generator Station

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • EcoloBlue's new 400,000 Liter/Day Atmospheric Water Generator Station. We present the 3D design concept video of the project. Not only can EcoloBlue's atmospheric water generators be used individually for smaller water needs, these water stations are intended for areas where the need for water is greater. Please contact us if you wish to discuss a possible project.
    This is just showing an example of how the machines can be bundled together to create more water than a single machine. Focusing on the palm trees, fountains, third party energy sources, etc are not the focus of the EcoloBlue Technology. They are all secondary and imaginative just to get the point across.

Комментарии • 929

  • @NavigatedChaos
    @NavigatedChaos 7 лет назад +226

    It's a dehumidifier with water filters.

    • @rjbjr
      @rjbjr 6 лет назад +12

      Think what would happen if every household in water shortage area had a small efficient unit like this. The key word here is efficiency. Will we be wasting more energy than the extra water supply is worth? Every solution seems to come with another problem in our heat generating civilization.

    • @LeslieIsgrigg
      @LeslieIsgrigg 6 лет назад +10

      Ronald Buss
      Stations designed like this can produce both electric and water resources.
      The question becomes what's the balance and do we benefit across the board with interest?
      I believe that's a resounding YES!

    • @spiritzweispirit1st638
      @spiritzweispirit1st638 6 лет назад +10

      Ive Waiting to See This Station for a Very long Time! This IS THE Answer World Wide!! >Build it >Build it> Build it !🌎

    • @bachlava7
      @bachlava7 6 лет назад +8

      But couldn't the power also just be used for desalination? Then we use ocean water and that's it.

    • @sonaruo
      @sonaruo 6 лет назад +19

      they need at least 25% humidity
      and they show a desert that has less than 5% to 0%
      IT IS MISLEADING
      this will work best in areas with lot of humidity
      but that areas have lots of lakes river, or else you do not have the humidity
      so instead of doing this bullshit you just need filters to filter the water that is tere to grasp
      in the places that this is the only way to get water THERE IS NOT THAT MUCH WATER TO BEGIN WITH
      if you take the water of the air surround you then you need to move the air to get the new air that has humidity
      so you need not only humidity but also wind
      or else this big scales IS BULLSHIT
      to get the 400k liters how many tones of air they need to bump in to extract this water??
      so divide that in 24 hours at tell us what the wind speed must be to achieve this production ?

  • @jedimastersterling1
    @jedimastersterling1 6 лет назад +54

    400000 L/day. Water's heat of vaporization is 2.3 MJ/L. That's 900000 MJ/day, or 10 MW continuous. You claim 5 MW wind and 5 MW solar, So your system operates at 100% efficiency, no energy lost while compressing refrigerants, cooling hot air, venting cooled air, running fans, pumps or anything else, and your rooftop solar panels get ideal sunlight 24/7 and the wind is always a stiff but manageable breeze.
    ...You didn't actually do a feasibility study did you?

    • @jayakrishnancp8848
      @jayakrishnancp8848 5 лет назад +1

      @Tributary House Ltd. a solar still spread over one hectre land will purify more water,more importantly without the need for solar panels or windmills,only space and initial construction work is required

    • @fladave99
      @fladave99 5 лет назад +4

      Total scam paid for by taxpayers. FEASABILITY STUDY? Money goes for coke and whores. Price triples, breaks in two months and taxes double. ENJOY!

    • @darman-nayyer
      @darman-nayyer 4 года назад +2

      It's a trap to hook an investor!

    • @jaishetty8586
      @jaishetty8586 4 года назад +2

      😂😂😂 I was almost about to write the same thing, But you already did that.

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад

      Did you also factor in how little the amount of moisture is in the desert air? This system would produce a fraction of the amount in the desert vs somewhere like Florida thay has very humid air. The problem is places like Florida(or any high humidity places) don't need water unlike a desert. This system fails in soooo many ways, especially the design thay this render shows. Solar panels facing opposite directions? Fail. Wind turbines thay close to each other? Fail. Condensing units so close to each other? Fail.

  • @dialecticalmonist3405
    @dialecticalmonist3405 7 лет назад +87

    That's great. I'm sure many cartoon people in the cartoon desert will be thankful for your cartoon water generating station.

    • @iamJahwill
      @iamJahwill 6 лет назад +6

      Best comment ever. Thankyou.

    • @noblehousefoundation1731
      @noblehousefoundation1731 6 лет назад +2

      Israel has portable air water makers now for their military !

    • @DraganJovcevski
      @DraganJovcevski 6 лет назад

      Hahha, have many people in cartoon?

    • @robinbrown4140
      @robinbrown4140 4 года назад +2

      Ever heard about Moses west atmospheric water generator?

  • @Skoda130
    @Skoda130 2 года назад +2

    5MW for 400K litres of water? I would hardly call that "economical".

  • @thedeadnigerianprincehaunt5096
    @thedeadnigerianprincehaunt5096 8 лет назад +105

    "This is the first atmospheric water station in the world", computer voice says! No, that is a CGI cartoon of your unproven Atmospheric water station producing theoretical amounts of CGI cartoon water in a simmulated desert.
    Get real at your own risk before trying to convince people with cartoons. For everyone else, do what they do if you can afford it...
    Go hook a wal mart home dehumidifier to a solar panel & AC converter, collect the water that drips off and call yourself another Edison, Tesla or Jesus... be sure to hype yourself up in the process!! Just don't plan to use it in low humidity areas where you'd actually need it or you'll be reduced to just having to show your friends cartoons of your miracle geyser! Lol there is a much more energy saving way to do this... dehumidification of Air with no electricity at all, it is called an Einstein Fridge process, working as a dehumidifier with a passive solar heat sink providing the very little heat required to run the process around the clock. You will find a similar type of fridge in an RV propane fired fridge, just modify it and test how well it would work in a desert with low humidity. Probably not worth the effort! Lol

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  8 лет назад +16

      Yes, it is a computer generated video. That is obvious to anyone watching it. The statement refers to no one designing anything similar to this, at least not at the time we did. We have proven and built industrial machines, that are in use globally. All this water station is, is many of these proven units plumbed together to produce a larger about of water. So using our proven to work machines in larger combination of each other is not a concept hard to understand. We always state that the machine needs 30% or higher humidity to produce a minimum amount of water. So we would not recommend it to any inland desert areas with humidity below that number. But the are many desert nations that are coastal that have great humidity. We are in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for example.

    • @2112426gh
      @2112426gh 6 лет назад +2

      VId says 25% humidity... How many stations, of any size do you have currently in use TODAY? thx

    • @enquire422
      @enquire422 6 лет назад +1

      NASA is CGi too!

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  6 лет назад +6

      We have over 15,000 home and office units worldwide, on 6 continents, from the last 10 years of sales. The industrial sized units, much fewer of course due to the cost, and individual projects in many different industries. Here is a video of our manufacturing facility taken by our Distributor in Reunion and Mauritius: ruclips.net/video/29Xa45kGIXc/видео.html

    • @JOHNDANIEL1
      @JOHNDANIEL1 6 лет назад

      Amen, and thank you for your Check of 9 trillion African dollars($4 usd ) , I will get back with you as soon as my Zulu Princes cashes it.

  • @richystar2001
    @richystar2001 6 лет назад +6

    Luke Skywalker and his adopted father were Water Farmers and used evaporators to condense and sell water on the desert planet Tatooine.

    • @patrickgardner396
      @patrickgardner396 3 года назад

      An idea "borrowed" freely by George Lucas from Frank Herbert's Dune (not the only thing he borrowed).

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад

      @Patrick Gardner it's not a concept that was created by dune. Dehumidifiers and air conditioners have been condensing water since the late 1800s.

  • @kosmonautik639
    @kosmonautik639 6 лет назад +12

    And the break even point is year 3798....end of july....

    • @SeganHealthHacker
      @SeganHealthHacker 4 года назад

      Lol, Didn't seem particularly expensive to me :)
      It's just a bunch of dehumidifiers (water condensation) leading water to an ozone maker (plasma/electric ark will generate O3).
      Sure you'll also need the PV panels and wind turbines to keep 'em running in an "ecofriendly" way, which makes it a little costly.

  • @DrJohnnyJ
    @DrJohnnyJ 6 лет назад +1

    Why such violent comments? Something like this can work and, in Dubai, where rainfall is scant despite high humidity, it will work. However, I would rather gather the run-off from the absorption chilllers as it comes free of cost.

  • @vinishshetty8055
    @vinishshetty8055 5 лет назад +10

    what is the cost of this project

    • @user-xp6zi5vr5v
      @user-xp6zi5vr5v 4 года назад +2

      $1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
      (pretty low cost if you ask me)

    • @user-xp6zi5vr5v
      @user-xp6zi5vr5v 3 года назад

      @@LegendLength ohhhhh

    • @retrotek0409
      @retrotek0409 3 года назад

      They gave email in other comments as:
      jepenh@ecoloblue.com
      mortlockj@ecoloblue.com

  • @dragonhill-permaculturefar1013
    @dragonhill-permaculturefar1013 5 лет назад +4

    I think there is an error in the video: "It can produce 400,000 Liters in 1 L bottles but 800,000 Liters in 1/2 Liters bottles"?

  • @amadoksevtus7699
    @amadoksevtus7699 9 лет назад +9

    I could make a million liter water generator, with sufficient finances.
    money is the only limit

    • @mrberry7950
      @mrberry7950 9 лет назад

      amadok sevtus how

    • @amadoksevtus7699
      @amadoksevtus7699 9 лет назад

      not easy to explain

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад

      +Mr Berry Did you see that new press release called Rain Tunnel Technology out of India. It sounds very unique using high frequency sound waves to generate water out of air as low as 10 PPM. Is 10 PPM the same as 10% humidity? The inventor of Rain Tunnel claims he can generate water at 1 cent USD per litre. 8 cents per KWH is the average cost in India. It sounds like he can collect at least 2 gallons of water out of the air using 1 kwh.

    • @mrberry7950
      @mrberry7950 9 лет назад +1

      Perpetual Overunity Wow, that is too cool. Got a link? I love it!

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад +1

      +Perpetual Overunity PPM is parts per million. It measures the amount of particles in your water. Ideal RO water should always be between 0-50 PPM.

  • @donnanorth7324
    @donnanorth7324 2 года назад +1

    And the $ cost of maintaining wind generators is?.....Sales pitch.

  • @alberteinsteinthejew
    @alberteinsteinthejew 3 года назад +3

    This is my dream home in the middle of desert, no need to pay for electric and water bill, only to pay for internet bill

    • @crybero2537
      @crybero2537 3 года назад

      Very soon open-source internet is going to be coming, you won't need to pay for that either

  • @rnsapbportland1959
    @rnsapbportland1959 6 лет назад +1

    Gave this a dislike because of all the plastic bottles.Typical scheme not examining all impacts.

  • @warpeace8891
    @warpeace8891 6 лет назад +10

    Minimum $6 million for just the wind turbines. 400,000 litres storage would cost less than $100,000 add in run offs collection and pumps with filters and you are likely to spend another $100,000.
    I could build 30 of these just for the cost of wind turbines (likely to be more, up to 120).
    What a joke. It does not exist. It does not work. If relative humidity is MINIMUM 25% and 5 degrees Celsius then I won't need such an extravagant use of resources to get such a small amount of water. Much better to capture the rainwater in such an area and store it for much less than 1% the energy and cost. If it worked in dry desert environments then that would be worth a trial. But it's either too dry or too cold for this. Nobody smart enough to afford it, would waste it on this fantasy.

    • @sonaruo
      @sonaruo 6 лет назад

      they talk about 25% humidity
      lol you do not need this system with such humidity go to the lake or river or wait for the rain and store the rain water
      also making this things bigger in scale will not work
      how much air you need to pump in to get the 400k?
      so they are going to produce a storm winds to make it??

    • @noblehousefoundation1731
      @noblehousefoundation1731 6 лет назад

      Israel has portable air water makers now for their military !

    • @daniellu8282
      @daniellu8282 6 лет назад

      The system can work if you harness the thermal energy differentials in your environment well. Chilling the air during a sunny day to its dew point directly would require a great deal of energy but the earth about 20-50 feet below is much closer to the dew point. The ground can serve as a heatsink for the condensers. There is a least one species of lizard that uses this phenomenon to collect water from the desert sand.

  • @sonaruo
    @sonaruo 6 лет назад +2

    they need at least 25% humidity
    and they show a desert that has less than 5% to 0%
    IT IS MISLEADING
    this will work best in areas with lot of humidity
    but that areas have lots of lakes river, or else you do not have the humidity
    so instead of doing this bullshit you just need filters to filter the water that is tere to grasp
    in the places that this is the only way to get water THERE IS NOT THAT MUCH WATER TO BEGIN WITH
    if you take the water of the air surround you then you need to move the air to get the new air that has humidity
    so you need not only humidity but also wind
    or else this big scales IS BULLSHIT
    to get the 400k liters how many tones of air they need to bump in to extract this water??
    so divide that in 24 hours at tell us what the wind speed must be to achieve this production ?

  • @tathakadabuda
    @tathakadabuda 5 лет назад +4

    Hi Ecoblue. I'm a big fan of this idea. Can you please tell me approximately how much it would cost to build this entire plant in Australia, including the solar and wind power generators to run it ?
    I've been sharing this video a lot, trying to get the Australian government to build at least one to start with in drought stricken areas. To be able to put a price along with it would be great.

    • @sanadhasaseen7741
      @sanadhasaseen7741 4 года назад

      can tell me are you have any information about the cost of this project please

    • @tathakadabuda
      @tathakadabuda 4 года назад

      Unfortunately I've never got a reply from them.

    • @retrotek0409
      @retrotek0409 3 года назад +2

      They gave the email to a Nigerian further up the comment stream

    • @goldiegolderman1842
      @goldiegolderman1842 10 месяцев назад +2

      They went out of business lol @@tathakadabuda

  • @utube4greenfuture
    @utube4greenfuture 2 года назад +1

    Do you have one that’s not CGI fantasyland?

  • @rp1894
    @rp1894 5 лет назад +10

    If these were installed globally and on a large scale, this could potentially affect climate change. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas. It's also part of a feedback loop. Hotter air holds more water. I wonder how many of these units it would take to take enough water out of the air to make the climate cooler?
    These could be used to refill aquifers.

    • @kevinmithnick9993
      @kevinmithnick9993 2 года назад

      Please add that water is a byproduct of combustion from cars, planes, stoves, gas turbines. New water that hardly will become oxygen and hydrogen again

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад

      No way it would ever effect the climate. You couldn't build enough of them and they use a ton of electricity.

    • @thomaswwwiegand
      @thomaswwwiegand 2 года назад +1

      not sure about cooling, but sure about making air dryer, with maybe less rain in some areas also.
      but dryer mean also less clouds and then less sun light reflection ?

    • @Necromancer_88
      @Necromancer_88 Год назад +1

      No , vapor saturation make less evaporating from oceans
      If air bécanes dryer the place is liberated and evaporation from ocean increase..

  • @Bapi107
    @Bapi107 6 лет назад +1

    Overall cost will be very high including maintenance. As compared to Israeli technology.

    • @selva2805
      @selva2805 5 лет назад

      This will improve the environment. But Israeli technology will eat and close the environment.

  • @TheBowersj
    @TheBowersj 6 лет назад +3

    So this is scaling up your home units to commercial size. Assuming an average of 1000 liters per household a day....one of these units would supply enough water for 400 houses. If water was reused up to 4 times as in earthship technology, you could support 1600 homes, possibly more if you produced water from air within each earthship. Of course places like Sahara desert wouldn't produce as much, but over time humidity would be trapped inside each house, outside in the air in micro climates that are protected by trees, windscreens, houses. This idea would work better out at sea with unlimited amounts of humidity in the air. However, at present producing steam from saltwater is the most efficient process to create electricity and water.

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад

      You're assuming a single house is using 250 gallons a day? If you lived in a area that needed this system you wouldn't be even using a fraction of that amount. That's a lot of water a day!

  • @KuntaRr
    @KuntaRr 6 лет назад +2

    hm... how expensive to build such „plants“?! I remember back in time, mankind/people were not so dumb to try to live in regions, where they cannot survive. why doing this thousands of years later + find (technologically great!!!) ideas, how to make people survive in such regions?! sorry for blaming below a techology video, but am I wrong?! ;)

  • @andeane1
    @andeane1 7 лет назад +4

    what is the effect on the atmosphere when enough water is taken out.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  7 лет назад +1

      There is more than enough moisture in the atmosphere that our machines won't cause an impact.

    • @stratupgeneralstudies2961
      @stratupgeneralstudies2961 5 лет назад

      @Allahu Akbar Aur Akbar Ke Gaand Me Rubber
      Please explain scientific reason

  • @MrDavesbox1
    @MrDavesbox1 Год назад +1

    Cost per liter of water?

  • @alteredstate5111
    @alteredstate5111 3 года назад +3

    Systems like this would go along way to help re-green some of the deserts on the planet 🌎

    • @dip.2271
      @dip.2271 2 года назад

      but this company is out of business now.

    • @collinsbuko
      @collinsbuko 2 года назад

      @@dip.2271 Oh no. Why is that?

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад +1

      Unfortunately it wouldn't. This system isn't grounded in reality.

  • @jdsol1938
    @jdsol1938 6 лет назад +2

    a nice system, i judge the end cost will be about the same as going to the market and buying bottled water

  • @prashantshinde3490
    @prashantshinde3490 9 лет назад +3

    At first thank you for sharing such great knowledge.I have some queries like,
    what is the minimum amount of humidity (in air) required to run this project effectively ?
    and are there any dis-advantages to the nature of this sysem.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад +7

      Prashant Shinde The industrial machines are designed to work effectively with 30% humidity or more. Of course, the higher the humidity, the better the production. We use this website to check the averages for people's areas: weatherspark.com/averages/29864/Concord-California-United-States Look at the relative humidity and dew point charts to get an idea. There really are no disadvantages I can see. They can be run on renewable energy, you can build a water station to accommodate the amount of water you need, and it gets water to people in need..

    • @prashantshinde3490
      @prashantshinde3490 9 лет назад +3

      EcoloBlue Thank you so much for clearing my doubts!
      #Helpful :)

    • @alfieamara8917
      @alfieamara8917 2 года назад

      @GoK, how can we invest in this?

  • @zegzezon5539
    @zegzezon5539 6 лет назад +2

    How many years is the ideal spread for *CAPEX* recovery?

  • @robinte98
    @robinte98 7 лет назад +10

    2:30-4:30 would be a great CS/GO map (y)

  • @701983
    @701983 3 месяца назад

    The EcoloBlue Water Station doesn't exist in the real world. And the power supply would be way too small for 400,000 liters per day in a dry climate.
    Water from air is extremely energy-intense.

  • @somsatxayalat
    @somsatxayalat 6 лет назад +9

    It's only happen in animation, thanks. Animation can do almost any things but nothing!

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  6 лет назад +3

      The EB10000 machine in the video has been built and has been proven to work. The animation is simply showing how the machines can be grouped together to produce larger volumes of water. So the technology is built and tested. We've been manufacturing these machines for 10 years.

    • @beedslolkuntus2070
      @beedslolkuntus2070 5 лет назад

      EcoloBlue May I know the total cost of this machine
      I expect 5million dollar?

  • @XFX4JOHN
    @XFX4JOHN 6 лет назад +2

    Depends On The Region , I guess This Project Is Made For Dubai's Atmosphere

    • @jaishetty8586
      @jaishetty8586 4 года назад

      yes, they are the only people you can fool easily. 😂😂

  • @superdave54811
    @superdave54811 8 лет назад +3

    Moisture farms.............just like in Star Wars.

  • @davehammond743
    @davehammond743 6 лет назад +1

    Plastic bottles?

  • @sangeetanama
    @sangeetanama 9 лет назад +4

    Super Atmospheric Water Genrator Stationin World nice

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад +2

      +RAJESH NAMA Just imagine a free energy source to run the A.W.G. EoloBlue. The only one that looks promising is the E-Cat from Andrea Rossi. This L.E.N.R. or Cold Fusion would generate free energy if used correctly. I noticed he just received another round of funding. It was a British Investment firm that is publicly traded who invested 22 million USD in the company called Industrial Heat. Industrial Heat is owned by Rossi. So far things sound good but lets see a working model powering EcoloBlue.

  • @derekelliott3971
    @derekelliott3971 3 года назад +1

    Nice graphics. Any 14-year-old with a fancy rendering package could do it. It would have a lot more credibility if there was 5 or 10 seconds of real stuff and not just some random water bottling plant

  • @nitrodad5775
    @nitrodad5775 6 лет назад +8

    One sand storm would wreck the entire system...

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies 3 года назад

    The most expensive water you could ever hope to have. Bar none! And some of the most dangerous - requiring extensive treatment and processing before it is safe to drink.
    This is a gigantic pile of garbage - and the physics doesn't lie.
    Don't recommend channel.

  • @11wertyh
    @11wertyh 8 лет назад +3

    Unlikely, this system is not efficient, to costly unnecesary on planet Earth. better to pipe water from the nearest source.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  8 лет назад +7

      +11wertyh It just depends where. Most of the people we speak with do not have a water source, that is the whole point. Create water where there isn't any.

    • @therawtruth6805
      @therawtruth6805 8 лет назад

      +11wertyh WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO DO IF THEY EVER TURN YOUR WATER OFF ????I WILL WAIT UNTIL THEN THIS IS SOOO CCCOOOOOLLLLL

    • @TommySleeze
      @TommySleeze 6 лет назад

      EcoloBlue any place has a water source with a long enough pipe.

    • @hgad99
      @hgad99 6 лет назад

      11wertyh ciencia computacional

    • @hgad99
      @hgad99 6 лет назад

      11wertyh
      Ciencia computaciional

  • @Beobout6
    @Beobout6 3 года назад +1

    Is there a chance that the water reactor will ever go critical?

  • @thelongroad9750
    @thelongroad9750 9 лет назад +3

    @EcoloBlue
    The obvious next step for you is to create your own bottled water at half the price!

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад +2

      +The Long Night Here in Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley I pay for a 5 gallon bottle of reverse osmosis city water $1 dollar. I heard from a ECOLOBLUE Rep that the can generate water at 18 cents a gallon. If we had solar panels on the roof we could generate the electricity to power the atmospheric water generator.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад

      +Perpetual Overunity That is true. Approximately $.18 a gallon depending on power source.

    • @thelongroad9750
      @thelongroad9750 9 лет назад

      +Perpetual Overunity
      It seems to me that trying to serve a large number of consumers with this technology, such as a city, may not be financially or logistically viable.. Without overturning much of society to put it in place.
      Developing countries would be interested. But I think if they can develop it to produce on a smaller scale then that could work really well. If they can produce enough to supply the needs of a family, then they can build the technology into houses. Or the equivalent to the local well...
      That could change the world!
      Just an idea.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад

      That is why we have solutions ideal for a family home, all of the way up to an entire community. This water station is just one example of what we can build. They are completely scalable. If you need a solution that produces up to 30 liters a day, we have that. Or one that produces 50k liters/day or 1 mil liters/day, we can do that too. See more information here: www.ecoloblueblog.com/2014/04/24/types-of-ecoloblue-atmospheric-water-generators/

    • @thelongroad9750
      @thelongroad9750 9 лет назад

      EcoloBlue
      Thats cool. I would do some crowd funding to help projects in the developing world.
      With all the crap people are funding nowadays it seems a shame for you not to.
      You will make money, demonstrate the technology in a real world setting and actually help some people!
      Win all around.
      But good luck & keep up the good work.

  • @janvanruth3485
    @janvanruth3485 3 года назад +1

    just a scam

  • @anonymousanonymous4775
    @anonymousanonymous4775 6 лет назад +9

    So you're making the desert air even dryer, and that will save the environment. Great :)

  • @MarcelDV
    @MarcelDV 6 лет назад +2

    I like the concept but I can't take this video serious with this stupid computer voice narration

    • @wifighostcruiser9665
      @wifighostcruiser9665 6 лет назад

      Congratulations, you're the first person I found in the comments, going from the top down, that was a big enough idiot not to know that this was a scam for idiots!

  • @angryadrien
    @angryadrien 7 лет назад +3

    are these devices running on a large scale like in the animation, or is it still a concept?
    great idea

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  7 лет назад +2

      It is just a concept of what is possible. We have interest in water station of various sizes, and in various countries. None built yet.

    • @wifighostcruiser9665
      @wifighostcruiser9665 6 лет назад +1

      Congratulations, you're the second person I found from the top down that was such an idiot that he didn't know this was a scam!

    • @wifighostcruiser9665
      @wifighostcruiser9665 6 лет назад +1

      @@EcoloBlueOfficial you're the a third-person LOL, water made in the desert from huge dehumidifiers what end up costing $1,000 a gallon LOL you could truck in the Dead Sea for what they're claiming to make

    • @gwenwalravens8030
      @gwenwalravens8030 6 лет назад

      * It is just an animation of what I know is impossible. We have interest in donated money of various sizes, and in various countries. Obviously non are built because that would require that the math of the concept is correct and the concept is feasible for the variables used in the math. Even with their huge amount of power, they'll never achieve what they say they would in this video. Even worse if the conditions become less than optimal or worse.

    • @gwenwalravens8030
      @gwenwalravens8030 6 лет назад

      @WIFIGHOST CRUISER Did you read my reply? I have nothing to do with this EcoloBlue scam. I was 'correcting' the statement from EcoloBlue.

  • @sw8741
    @sw8741 Год назад

    All for the low price of $1,000 per liter! Seriously though, that there is some expensive water. Now if you grow some sort of desert high yield cash crop and use the excess water for drinking you could lower the costs. But still, very expensive water.

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly8827 6 лет назад +4

    Why would anyone do this? Better to pipe in evaporated or reverse osmosis sea water. Use all that energy to make glass from the sand for more solar panels.

  • @spsp6903
    @spsp6903 4 года назад

    According to the Russia media, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (www.rfbr.ru) has funded and the Federal Scientific Agro-Engineering Center VIM (Moscow) has developed and tested the Atmospheric Water Extractor "Vozdushnii Rodnik". The tests have been taking place since 2016 in the territory of the Nikitsky Botanical Garden (Yalta, Crimea). The Project Managers Mr. Oleg Vasilievich Sharipov, Head of the Department of International Relations, RFBR,
    Mr. Sergey Sodnomovich Dorzhiev (VIM) and Mrs. Elena Gennadievna Bazarova (VIM) claim that AWG is able to produce hundreds of liters of water per day.
    The installation, which was given the commercial name "Aqventus", is designed to solve the problems of supplying Crimea with water. "Aqventus" is superior to American and Israeli counterparts in water productivity. At the Russia-Africa forum in Sochi in October of this year, the layout of the installation was demonstrated to all heads of African countries invited by V. Putin to the first of its kind forum. www.aqventus.com

  • @donnastein2296
    @donnastein2296 9 лет назад +15

    air from water is a terrific technology but it needs to solve the plastic bottle problem also before that part of it goes forward. Good luck in finding the financing.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад +6

      Donna Stein That's the idea, that our machines create water, and people can be use reusable containers (stainless steel, glass, etc) to fill with water. Plastic doesn't need to be used. Even in our A.C.E. system that uses a bottling system, biodegradable bottles can be used.

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад

      +Donna Stein I wonder if this is a publicly traded company?

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад +1

      +EcoloBlue Dear Donna Stein, This sounds like a great company. I enjoyed the video on the large scale facility. Has anyone build such a system? For my home use how many KWH is needed to generate AWG for 1 gallon at 50% humidity? One of your reps said it cost 18 cents a gallon for EcoloBlue AWG. I think I am paying around 15 cents a KWH.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад +3

      +Perpetual Overunity EcoloBlue is not publicly traded. And here is some general information on the power cost. It may not be exact, but it's a good guideline. www.ecoloblueblog.com/2015/05/13/the-reality-behind-the-power-cost-of-an-ecoloblue-homeoffice-unit/

    • @perpetualoverunity5652
      @perpetualoverunity5652 9 лет назад

      I like the idea of using 21st century thinking to solve our water and energy problems. My quest is to find a free energy generator that could power EcoloBlue. This would provide free water and a free power source. Look how low electrical energy from the Sun using PV is being generated. The record low was sold to a major utility for as little as 2 cents per KWH. USA is at 3 cents per KWH.

  • @donshafiq3181
    @donshafiq3181 6 лет назад +1

    The video was already 4 years...can I watch the real video project that already developed? Not a virtual video anymore.

  • @MiranPayman
    @MiranPayman 7 лет назад +18

    Most expensive water ever...

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  7 лет назад +7

      Depends how you look at it. Bringing water to an area that doesn't have any, has a cost, and can save lives.

    • @incognitotorpedo42
      @incognitotorpedo42 6 лет назад +9

      Places that don't have any water tend not to have any humidity.

    • @parajacks4
      @parajacks4 6 лет назад +1

      Meran Payman
      Well done. Most people don’t understand the concept of....if it sounds to good to be true, then it is.
      Do your research people, this is a ridiculously expensive method that only works with high humidity smh

    • @TommySleeze
      @TommySleeze 6 лет назад +1

      EcoloBlue but at the cost to build this item, you could truck in water or build pipelines for cheaper.

    • @davem5308
      @davem5308 6 лет назад

      Meran Payman - yes, and "they" don't already make water, crazy expensive in the here and now!

  • @unfug1863
    @unfug1863 6 лет назад

    400.000 liters or 400 cubicmeters per day? 1 cubic liter costs about 1,55€ which means your daily income amounts to 620€. Let‘s assume you can „harvest“ this amount of water daily for 365 days a year you‘d only generate a revenue of 226.300€. I wonder how long it would take to make this profitable. The acquisition, operational and maintenance costs won‘t be cheap. Considering that the average human consums about 160 liters per day, this would only serve 2.666 people.

  • @dukeoblom6503
    @dukeoblom6503 7 лет назад +3

    EcoloBlue. I have a few questions. How much airflow per hour do you need to recover 400,000 litres per day? If you take 5 grams of moisture from 1 m3 of air, then you need around 5,000,000 m3h ( 5 km3!!!). If you understood the significance of this number, you would not stack the containers up and cramped together in the same space. Was an actual engineer involved in this project or just product designers? Who thought of installing the solar panels in every single direction? I also love the fountain at the water generating station. How much water is evaporated there? Overall it looks more as a publicity stunt than a project rooted in reality. Shame!

    • @randybobandy9828
      @randybobandy9828 2 года назад

      It's obviously just some random persons design. You are right about both points. Solar panels facing opposite directions is silly. Having those wind turbine. that close is silly too since they will lower the efficiency of the other wind turbine next to them. The places that desperately need water like this( like in the middle of the desert) have next to no humidity in the air to begin with! Meaning these systems won't work or barely work at all! Yes stacking(not so much stacking but having them side by side) the units so close is silly since the water they exhaust will have no humidity left and then that air will go right into another dehumidifier and extract no more humidity. There is a reason this is simply a compute render and not a actual place because it simply wouldn't be feasible to make this(cost wise and practicality wise) and that's why we don't see them. Places that are humid that this setup would actually work in don't need water since humid climates have plenty of rain already.

  • @toledopower5276
    @toledopower5276 2 года назад

    I think it's a great Idea! Brilliant actually! Many Countries instead of fighting for land they should start transforming millions of square miles of desert land into productive farmland and even build new Cities! New Real Estate! The Sahara is so empty waste of space.

  • @ludaqryz
    @ludaqryz 8 лет назад +4

    how to make money appear out of thin air.....

  • @jasonkeigley6424
    @jasonkeigley6424 2 года назад

    THIS COULD BE MADE A LOT CHEAPER. I COULD PRODUCE THE SAME AMOUNT OF WATER FOR $600K. THAT IS A LOT OF WATER. 105,670 GALLONS A DAY. FREE WATER FOR THE WORLD!

  • @deanmohamed795
    @deanmohamed795 7 лет назад +3

    Has any city or state applied this marvelous water generating system today? I would like to witness if this system really works in real life!

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  7 лет назад +6

      Government entity, not sure. But we have around 15,000 units in homes and office worldwide. We also have home and industrial units in South Africa, Haiti, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Philippines, and many other countries.

    • @deanmohamed795
      @deanmohamed795 7 лет назад

      Great to hear that and thanks for the reply

    • @peetjvdm
      @peetjvdm 6 лет назад

      EcoloBlue Cape Town South Africa is currently having major water crisis. Can't your system bring them some relief since it's a coastal city?

    • @jmatt98
      @jmatt98 6 лет назад

      Peet van der Merwe unfortunately no

    • @noblehousefoundation1731
      @noblehousefoundation1731 6 лет назад

      Israel has portable air water makers now for their military !

  • @МариоФеликс
    @МариоФеликс 3 года назад +1

    Nice 👍

  • @EcoloBlueOfficial
    @EcoloBlueOfficial  9 лет назад +22

    In response to Craigslist Administrator, there are many types of energy sources available in the world, these are just a few example. Plus, if you incorporate energy storage, then this is a non-issue. As well as many other innovative green energy sources being created all the time.

    • @irenec8361
      @irenec8361 8 лет назад +2

      +EcoloBlue Great concept and design, but can you please explain what is the purpose of a "remineralization process"?
      You've essentially have pure distilled water by this process, and since 95% of all trace minerals we get are through our foods, and the trace amounts one gets through water is subject only to region, so I don't see the point of this. The most all this does is increase cost of operation and ownership, plus introducing a rather cumbersome point-of-failure into the design.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  8 лет назад +10

      +Irene C It is the preference of the customer. 95% or so of our customers who purchase our home/office units do not want distilled water, they specifically want the minerals to be placed back into the water. As far as our commercial solutions, it is just an add on option should someone want it. As the water created for large scale solutions could have many end uses or destinations, mineralization does not come standard on those, but is an option.

    • @irenec8361
      @irenec8361 8 лет назад +1

      Thank you for the followup.

    • @davidgavilanes2633
      @davidgavilanes2633 8 лет назад +1

      Is because osmosis, if you drink plain water then all the minerals in your buddy will go out because it tries to compensate and the water will go out almost instantaneously, but if the water has the same amount of salt and minerals as the blood then you re hydrated, that's why sport drinks works better than just plain water from bottle.

    • @EcoloBlueOfficial
      @EcoloBlueOfficial  8 лет назад +1

      Yes, that is the general consensus as far as people not wanting to drink water without minerals. As far as being like a sports drink, our water is no where near that. People would have to include their own additives to get it to that place.

  • @tiavor
    @tiavor 6 лет назад

    at least you are not hiding that it takes ridicules amounts of energy to condense water. but using disel generators is just too inefficient, you could just transport the water instead of the disel, it wouldn't make much of a difference.at least your theoretical calculations are OK, you have ~51 MWh/day in a best case szenario, which could condense 660kL (using peltier). considering filtering 400kL is not that far off and it is using compressors which is more efficient than peltier.leaves just the question, in which desert do you want to build this?

  • @daciogutierrez4132
    @daciogutierrez4132 3 года назад

    Bullocks. Not enough water in the air, or conversely, too much energy for too little water. An existing passive system in a humid environnement ( Peru) is barely useful. Let alone an energy hungry system in an arid environnement. Sticking solar panels to your project does not make it viable or eco-friendly...

  • @videolabguy
    @videolabguy 6 лет назад

    Most expensive water on Earth. Watching too much Star Wars. Where's the droid that speaks Bachi?

  • @tramvaj1271
    @tramvaj1271 5 лет назад

    I do not think that big pipe is needed for 400 000 liters per day. I transfer 10 000 liters per day trough 1/2" garden hose and do not use 24/7 1000 liters per hour is not to much high pressure on hose. I know I should put 3/4" hose but 1/2" doing job fine :)

  • @xungngo
    @xungngo 2 года назад

    Like Mr. Bill Gate would say, "the math is not working out". IOW, there is no way anyone would spend millions to produce a thousand dollar worth of water.

  • @dbmail545
    @dbmail545 6 лет назад

    25% minimum humidity? That desertscape doesn't look like that happens very often. The issue is that for the price of this you could truck in water. This is the most expensive "free" water in captivity. Notice how it is mostly CGI and never gives an estimated price for this non-existent water factory. The only real images are from an unaffiliated water bottling plant.

  • @PacoOtis
    @PacoOtis 2 года назад

    Why the horrible intrusive music? Did we Americans assist in this video as it is something we would do. Congratulations on the cleverness and development of your machine! The very best of luck!

  • @AnalystPrime
    @AnalystPrime 3 года назад

    It's not that this technology doesn't work or that the water would be too expensive, but 99% of all settlements were found near a water source or they didn't last long so improved desalination or waste water cleaning seems to be more obvious solution. However, if your water source is contaminate or dries out these things do still work, and have been proven to work in as low as 10% humidity, and while it is obviously more expensive than tap water in some other country where pure water is plentiful it is far cheaper in the long run than transporting bottled water.
    Which leads to my question: Why, given this has been proven to work and the people using these systems have nothing but praise for them, is the internet so full of trolls who keep claiming it doesn't and spread fake news that it is a scam?
    People pointing at ancient EVs and solar panels and saying Tesla will never be able to make a working electric car or a solar panel that provides useful amounts of power were quickly proven wrong and everyone who had paid attention to how technology has advanced knew that would happen, but it made sense the ICE manufactures and fossil fuel industry would try to keep their position by spreading such lies. Water is getting scarce in may parts of the world, but it is obvious that some village in Africa where women have to carry water from ten miles away cannot afford to buy bottled water or to build water pipes from hundreds of miles away, and big cities cannot bring in enough bottled water for it to be useful and it its the current water provider who would be building all the desalination plants and water generators so there is no water monopoly that would be threatened by this technology. So why? Who would benefit from the misinformation?

  • @badbillybrookes
    @badbillybrookes 3 года назад

    Yes, because we all know that the homes of the Rich and Famous cannot afford water in the middle of the desert. What's this system ? 10 Million dollars plus upkeep.

  • @JoeBee999
    @JoeBee999 5 лет назад

    Let me guess. You are seraching for money for this "project"? Watch Thunderf00t debunking videos about dehumidifiers

  • @djgto7050
    @djgto7050 6 лет назад

    Why don't we collect and store water from high rain areas of the world ,and distribute it to arid areas of the world? Example flooding in certain areas in the u.s,.and water going down the sewer pipes,,,,,,,what a waste.*******

  • @joelweidenfeld471
    @joelweidenfeld471 6 лет назад

    No matter what the cost of this water it must be less than simple trucking or piping it in from the closest water source or it's only perhaps a environmental success or perhaps a temporary solution or a solution to a temporary problem. Be nice to have something like that for traveling or csmoibg or living off grid where agsub you only have temporary issue in each spot you are staying...and if it was cheap and portable then you really would have something. Its about cheap power which exists but the GOVERENNT would never ever empower humanity with it and cease being the elite kings of the world

  • @umaribnal-khattabmalaysia6831
    @umaribnal-khattabmalaysia6831 5 лет назад

    African and middle east countries are the best place for this kind of project middle east and African countries don't have any problem for sunlight which need for solar and air which need for wind power in this region humidity always very high.

  • @v300
    @v300 6 лет назад

    Breathing such dehydrated air could be harming to people. Extracting 400,000 from are probably creates a super dry air which you don't want to breathe

  • @jasonshoraka1098
    @jasonshoraka1098 6 лет назад

    Nice technology but it sounds like they're expensive water if they have to have one engineer in 3 technicians living there year-round making sure the machine is running properly their salaries have to be paid sounds like very expensive water, but it is interesting I know they sell smaller units for people's houses that use 5000 or 6000 watts and produce one and a half or two gallons of water a day

  • @louisc.gasper7588
    @louisc.gasper7588 6 лет назад

    So where does the real station exist? It's really just a concept, isn't it? It proposes to use solar energy as a principal energy source in an area where the relative humidity is at least 35%. Where is that? Your cartoon shows the plant apparently in the middle of a bally desert. This whole thing smells of BS.

  • @luckyx16
    @luckyx16 3 года назад

    If, and I do mean if. If this system exists, why were there no real photos of it? Video would have been great, but at least put in a real photo, in lieu of all the fake everything that was in the video.
    Yes, I believe it can happen, but what are they hiding that prevents them from at least a glimpse of a picture of this facility?

  • @michaelleestevens2194
    @michaelleestevens2194 6 лет назад

    HEY BIG GUY WHATS THE COST OF A PLANT LIKE THIS???? DIRT FARMER MICHAEL USNAVYRETIRED LIVING IN THE COUNTRY OF PANAMA..GOD AND COUINTRY BE SAFE TAKE CARE..

  • @sarrahsapp
    @sarrahsapp 6 лет назад

    The only thing I don’t like about this is the idea of putting water in bottles. We need to stop using plastic bottles and if there are water vendo / refill kiosk available wherein people can refill safe and clean water, we can eliminate the use of bottles. Time to bring our own cups everywhere. Do you think you need to bring bottled water everywhere if water kiosk are available anywhere? I hope businessmen would see the potential for water refill stations or water vendo. When we have big life changing ideas like creating water we need to take into consideration other factors and continue being eco and green. Water is life and I don’t encourage a life in a bottle. Let's save one another and mother nature and humanity will be saved. =)

  • @tylerthomas2062
    @tylerthomas2062 6 лет назад

    What do you think is going to happen pulling all that water out of the atmosphere?????it's gonna be a dry world!!thunderdome here we come😨😨😨😨

  • @Absaalookemensch
    @Absaalookemensch 6 лет назад

    It's a sham.
    Dehumidifiers pulling water our air that has little humidity.
    It's wouldn't produce 400,000 liters of water per day if the relative humidity was 100%.
    It's the largest because it doesn't work. It's less expensive and polluting to truck in water.

  • @user-zx8on5rm5t
    @user-zx8on5rm5t 4 года назад +1

    Well....... i have to make a research work on this topic going to be real hard.

  • @reinaldoperez272
    @reinaldoperez272 4 года назад

    Animation is what you find about water from air. The technology exist but no company develop any working machine.

  • @jackoneill8585
    @jackoneill8585 9 лет назад

    and when the sun goes down your water stops.. and when the wind dont blow no water.. clouds no water.. its maybe 40% effiecent ...

  • @patriot9455
    @patriot9455 5 лет назад

    an "eco friendly " producer of bottled water, in bottles that will fill the land fill with plastic. if this is ecofriendly, then cigarettes are as safe as the tobacco companies said in 1948.

  • @mansonyau
    @mansonyau 6 лет назад

    good idea but poor planning, is not Ecolo friendly after all. Transfer water by truck and using plastic bottles to store the water create more problems than the saving!

  • @cgg2961
    @cgg2961 4 года назад

    Since there is 9 times the water in the air than the oceans how will machines effect our ecology... Will some areas be water rich and others not? Can a person buy a system for a whole house ? What would be the cost and repairs and filters cost?

  • @daves.9479
    @daves.9479 6 лет назад

    Wait a minute---where does the water for the trees (and their humidity-increasing loss of water) come from? Don't tell me....

  • @theinfinite2653
    @theinfinite2653 3 года назад

    Sounds good but when u pull that much water from the air then wouldn't that affect the environment ...the air is gonna be dryer for sure

  • @davidgrowsdragonfruit5301
    @davidgrowsdragonfruit5301 6 лет назад +2

    I summon @thunderf00t !!!

  • @jimthomas777
    @jimthomas777 5 лет назад

    pump sea water to reservoirs and let the water evaporate leaving the salt behind , use the salt for seasoning and billions of gallons of water will raise humidity and make rain , plant vegetation and instant rain forest jungle

  • @germanrojas4945
    @germanrojas4945 4 года назад

    We should send to mars a ship like that to produce water and drain water anywhere on mars . seems theres no sun so loar pannels wont work.. What will work is magnet free energy light , air fan , .

  • @Sc0rPsX
    @Sc0rPsX 6 лет назад

    I know the economic sense of why, but all that work for pure water only to use plastic bottles... and it has been show there is microplastic particles in the water as a result.

  • @robhingston
    @robhingston 4 года назад

    If water is the most precious thing to mankind this is the most precious machine.. dehumidifier add filter add solar panels

  • @dud719
    @dud719 6 лет назад +1

    This brings joy to my heart. 10,000 times better than watching American News.

  • @wesamalwesam6895
    @wesamalwesam6895 3 года назад

    Welcome
    Is this type of water lacking minerals because it is considered distilled water?

  • @richardgoode5657
    @richardgoode5657 6 лет назад +2

    A future technology as a energy!

  • @kurmis999
    @kurmis999 6 лет назад

    and is still cheaper to get trucks with 30 tones of water delivered 3000 km every day for 30years. when to build this shit

  • @PatrickOSullivanAUS
    @PatrickOSullivanAUS 6 лет назад

    Ummm. How do the trees increase net humidity when trees must be given water in the first place? It would be great if it is cost effective.

  • @nadeem5476
    @nadeem5476 6 лет назад

    it's not feasible at all. so much expensive. it's much better to carry water thru pipeline from nearest city :) #idiot

  • @whatahowl1
    @whatahowl1 6 лет назад

    Great idea but the filter is unnecessary. The water out of the air in as clean as it going to get. Also every home with a heat pump has a water maker on it already