Hi Ivan, great stuff again. I have a question from another angle though, hope you can see my comment here. The question is, with this massive email list, what software do you use to send cold emails to the recipients? How do you send them? Like 1000 emails at a time or send them one by one(not practical considering the amount of email addresses though). End of the day, keep up the good work!
Thanks, Henry... I don't have any videos... at-all... on this channel... making recommendations for email sending, because I really don't have any desire to offer content or consulting on that part of things. So, I don't have any recommendations for you, for that. You need a software that can interface with an SMTP provider that is okay with you doing cold email blasts, and that's about all I will say about it. I prefer to do blasts, but dripfeeding is great, too. Avoid transactional SMTP providers. If you do some searches for services, based on all that, you will find some solutions. I wish you well in figuring-it-out... best to you!
Yeah, I ran it on Leo and it came back with 300 valids and 150 invalids, but as I'm re-running it on a different validator, I can see that some of those didn't make it. It also takes longer on this other site. 🤷♂ It's been running for 40 minutes so far, so I'm interested to see the difference.
Thank you for this video. Would you say that the Atomic Email Verifier is one of the best services in the market? .. found this video looking for Atomic reviews. Tx, H
@@HostMaria What you have to watch-out for, is the log column, because they don't export it, it's only visible right after the process finishes, and that sections shows that a lot of the stuff tagged for failure is actually just spam blockers. So, many of them are valid mails, just stubborn!
Hey there. Great video. Im looking to buy the atomic email hunter, verifier and whois domain extractor. Are these all good and are they safe? Is it quick im bulk? Can i use VPN instead of proxies? Are the tests reliable. Appreciate your response.
I use the verifier, without proxies. I can't attest to any of the other softwares. I still use the verifier, and it works fine, without proxies. People get confused about it, but it just shows the spam blockers, and that shows you they are legit, they just don't like you. :p
Well I paid for Atom Mail verify er but not working for me. I’ve contacted support wich is ignoring the situation. Asking for a refund. They use any excuses possible. They reply and disappear
In one of the corners... itll tell you if port 25 is open, or not. Check that, first. Make sure youbare just using your IP... If port 25 is open, and you are just using your IP, then it should work. The company should help, but if it's too much trouble, yeah... you might need a refund.
@@getivan You don't see that if you use proxies? Btw. and do you happen to know some proxies that would work as it looks like there is no provider that would offer that... btw now I checked 2 emails with my local IP and then checked one that resulted not existent... and then when checking my good email in the log it now said that it couldn't check as I'm on barracuda black list - so checking just 1 non existent email caused blacklisting... this way of checking emails doesn't seem very efficient hhh .... btw I would say that it's very interesting that the email that I was checking had barracuda in the domain name but it was not a service but some website for kids... wondering if it's not some honeypot,etc..
The whole point of verification, is to find the blastables, the spam traps, and the bad syntax or totally dead ones. So, it does do what it's supposed to. You shouldn't be actually sending mail from your private IP. For sending the campaigns, you use an SMTP, like Mailgun, or similar. Best to you...
I would contact their support. I can't say you will have a good time, though. That's something that I've never had a problem with, so you'll just need to cruise some searches, until you can spot a solution for opening it up. I can't remember if that's a machine issue, or a router issue. If it's a router issue, it's likely going to be an even bigger pain. That's assuming you are local. If you are working in a VPS, then you should maybe consider contacting your cloud provider support channel. As far as initial setup, I'm not sure what you mean... I always run it from the machine IP, and that shouldn't require any configuration, really. If you keep after it, you should get it figured-out... Sorry for your troubles...
I'm not aware of any free tool that compares. You might try this, but I haven't done a case study on it, yet: h-educate.com/super-email-validator/ Another paid tool is G-Lock, but it's more complicated to use. Atomic is the best solution I came across, back when I was searching and testing things.
As long as the email is in the first column, it will retain the other data in the output. It's also advisable to do a find/replace for any delimiter that isn't a comma, in the final output file. That makes it easier to open-up in Excel format, without having to do a manual delimiter, once you're inside Excel.
Yes, I believe it requires port 25... Not sure about the proxy question... I don't use proxies with it... I wanna blast a single IP, so I can see any kind of spam protections...
Why would you need to NOT have your IP blocked, when the whole point is to find which mails have spam protections? LoL You actually want to see the blocks. If you are trying to circumvent spam protections, at the sending level, then you need variated IPs, anyways, and copy, and a bunch of other guff.
@@getivan What happens when ur ip is flagged and it hurts ur deliverability rates? is it true that if u reboot ur modem u will be assigned with a new fresh IP
You just verify from your local server... you don't blast from there... The whole point is to find blastables, anyways, but otherwise you can just segment your list, and send from differing SMTP entities. To one segment you slowly dripfeed, and to another to might blast more aggressively. If you are super concerned about deliverability, then what's the point of verification, if you are gonna mail them with the most pristine parameters, anyways? :p The main benefit, at that point, is scrubbing totally dead ones, or images, etc.
Hi Ivan, great stuff again. I have a question from another angle though, hope you can see my comment here. The question is, with this massive email list, what software do you use to send cold emails to the recipients? How do you send them? Like 1000 emails at a time or send them one by one(not practical considering the amount of email addresses though). End of the day, keep up the good work!
Thanks, Henry...
I don't have any videos... at-all... on this channel... making recommendations for email sending, because I really don't have any desire to offer content or consulting on that part of things.
So, I don't have any recommendations for you, for that.
You need a software that can interface with an SMTP provider that is okay with you doing cold email blasts, and that's about all I will say about it.
I prefer to do blasts, but dripfeeding is great, too.
Avoid transactional SMTP providers.
If you do some searches for services, based on all that, you will find some solutions.
I wish you well in figuring-it-out... best to you!
Yeah, I ran it on Leo and it came back with 300 valids and 150 invalids, but as I'm re-running it on a different validator, I can see that some of those didn't make it. It also takes longer on this other site. 🤷♂ It's been running for 40 minutes so far, so I'm interested to see the difference.
I still use Atomic...
For scaled verification, the only othrr thing that comes close is G-Lock, but Atomic is much easier to use, so I still use it...
Good info! Thanks!
Thank you for this video. Would you say that the Atomic Email Verifier is one of the best services in the market? .. found this video looking for Atomic reviews. Tx, H
Yes, it's one of the best, and it's the one I still use.
@@getivan thank you! running an Atomic test examining an old email database.. huhhh .. around 12% is only valid. Thank you (really)! H
@@HostMaria
What you have to watch-out for, is the log column, because they don't export it, it's only visible right after the process finishes, and that sections shows that a lot of the stuff tagged for failure is actually just spam blockers.
So, many of them are valid mails, just stubborn!
Hey there. Great video. Im looking to buy the atomic email hunter, verifier and whois domain extractor.
Are these all good and are they safe? Is it quick im bulk?
Can i use VPN instead of proxies? Are the tests reliable. Appreciate your response.
I use the verifier, without proxies.
I can't attest to any of the other softwares.
I still use the verifier, and it works fine, without proxies.
People get confused about it, but it just shows the spam blockers, and that shows you they are legit, they just don't like you. :p
i want to connect u . thank you
Well I paid for Atom Mail verify er but not working for me. I’ve contacted support wich is ignoring the situation. Asking for a refund. They use any excuses possible. They reply and disappear
In one of the corners... itll tell you if port 25 is open, or not.
Check that, first.
Make sure youbare just using your IP...
If port 25 is open, and you are just using your IP, then it should work.
The company should help, but if it's too much trouble, yeah... you might need a refund.
Same here this company is a scammer never paid my refund
What proxies do you use?? - basically all proxies have the port 25 closed so they cannot work with Atomic Email Verifier..
You don't need proxies with the verifier...
You want to see where they will block you, so using your local IP is best.
@@getivan You don't see that if you use proxies? Btw. and do you happen to know some proxies that would work as it looks like there is no provider that would offer that... btw now I checked 2 emails with my local IP and then checked one that resulted not existent... and then when checking my good email in the log it now said that it couldn't check as I'm on barracuda black list - so checking just 1 non existent email caused blacklisting... this way of checking emails doesn't seem very efficient hhh .... btw I would say that it's very interesting that the email that I was checking had barracuda in the domain name but it was not a service but some website for kids... wondering if it's not some honeypot,etc..
The whole point of verification, is to find the blastables, the spam traps, and the bad syntax or totally dead ones.
So, it does do what it's supposed to.
You shouldn't be actually sending mail from your private IP.
For sending the campaigns, you use an SMTP, like Mailgun, or similar.
Best to you...
brilliant
Thanks for the video! Would you send emails when the status is "p_antispam_system"?
Green is blastable... the rest are dripfed from an alternate burner domain... :p
What does uncertain means in atomic?
It has a log entry, so you can see the status reason.
Usually, it's because spam blockers are smacking you down.
I downloaded atomic email verifier but port 25 is blocked and I am running into problems with initial setup also. Any suggestions?
I would contact their support.
I can't say you will have a good time, though.
That's something that I've never had a problem with, so you'll just need to cruise some searches, until you can spot a solution for opening it up.
I can't remember if that's a machine issue, or a router issue.
If it's a router issue, it's likely going to be an even bigger pain.
That's assuming you are local.
If you are working in a VPS, then you should maybe consider contacting your cloud provider support channel.
As far as initial setup, I'm not sure what you mean... I always run it from the machine IP, and that shouldn't require any configuration, really.
If you keep after it, you should get it figured-out... Sorry for your troubles...
is any other good solution to verify mails ?
I'm not aware of any free tool that compares.
You might try this, but I haven't done a case study on it, yet: h-educate.com/super-email-validator/
Another paid tool is G-Lock, but it's more complicated to use.
Atomic is the best solution I came across, back when I was searching and testing things.
@@getivan got my answer here :) Awesome! Thank you, Helmuts
I have names and phone numbers on my csv file should I remove them before verifying or is it cool to upload it
As long as the email is in the first column, it will retain the other data in the output.
It's also advisable to do a find/replace for any delimiter that isn't a comma, in the final output file.
That makes it easier to open-up in Excel format, without having to do a manual delimiter, once you're inside Excel.
Does it require port 25 to be open on our local machine? Can't we use port 25 of a proxy server?
Yes, I believe it requires port 25...
Not sure about the proxy question... I don't use proxies with it... I wanna blast a single IP, so I can see any kind of spam protections...
@@getivan SpamHaus blocked me! :( You should use a proxy... I can't send emails now. My IP is blocked. Thanks.
Why would you need to NOT have your IP blocked, when the whole point is to find which mails have spam protections? LoL
You actually want to see the blocks.
If you are trying to circumvent spam protections, at the sending level, then you need variated IPs, anyways, and copy, and a bunch of other guff.
Please can you reply me sir? And I have changed my password for more than 10 times without any results sir
Contact support
Is there a mac Version for atomic Email verifier available?
Not really sure about that...
Check their salespage... I'm sure they list OS compatability...
Why so you use your IP, if it s gonna get flagged with time?
Because it shows you which ones have spam protections.
You want to see which ones are spamable?
@@getivan What happens when ur ip is flagged and it hurts ur deliverability rates? is it true that if u reboot ur modem u will be assigned with a new fresh IP
You just verify from your local server... you don't blast from there...
The whole point is to find blastables, anyways, but otherwise you can just segment your list, and send from differing SMTP entities.
To one segment you slowly dripfeed, and to another to might blast more aggressively.
If you are super concerned about deliverability, then what's the point of verification, if you are gonna mail them with the most pristine parameters, anyways? :p
The main benefit, at that point, is scrubbing totally dead ones, or images, etc.
can i get smtp from atomic hunter ?
I dont think so...
Try mailgun, maybe...
Hey bro, what proxy you use for open port 25?
I don't use proxies... I just use my IP.
That shows me what gets banned, so I can see spam protections easier. :p
@@getivan but port 25 is blocked by my ISP, how to solve this problem?