@@SyDatNguyen-r4j NML Cygni is smaller at around 1350 solar radii, IRAS 05280-6910 is 1367 solar radii, VX Sagitarii is about 1480 solar radii (1940 solar radii estimates are very old), M31-RV is a luminous red nova that ended, Godzilla got downsized with JWST data, Stephenson 2-18 is overestimated, WOH G17 is a foreground star, N6949-BH1 is a luminous red nova or a failed supernova, either way its not that large anymore and doesn't count
@NoobSaibotMK666 Pluto is way further back then Jupiter, and the video said Saturn would be the new mercury, that would make Pluto the new 3rd rock from the sun
Not every star has the mass needed to go supernova. For instance, our sun is too small to end its life with a supernova. It will eventually shed its outer layers and form a planetary nebula like the Crab Nebula and the core will turn into a white dwarf. When it starts to exhaust its nuclear fuel and eventually form iron, which needs more energy to fuse any further, so it can no longer sustain the radiation pressure to keep it from being crushed by gravity, which will collapse the core into a hot dense white dwarf that will slowly cool and dim over trillions of years. Before this, it will cool down and expand into a red giant. Stars with at least ten times the mass of the sun are potentially going to end their life in a supernova and collapse into a neutron star, and if it’s more massive then it will become a black hole
[Corrected] [Not] Fake news.. UY sciti is ~1700x [~909x based on a 2023 measurment] and Stephenson 2-18 is [theorized to be ] ~2150x our suns radius [but its size and location is still in debate] [I] might want to do more research... woh g64 is [the] big[gest.Thanks for the great vedio.I initially thought this was incorrect info, but doing my own sanity check shows it's accurate.]
UY Scuti was downsized to 900 solar radii and Stephenson 2-18 radius is unknown as it was found that the star isn't a part of the cluster Stephenson 2, making its distance uncertain at the moment You might want to do more research...
@xstar9567 sir, I stand corrected. Great research. Wikipedia has UY scuti 909 solar radia.radiation. Stephenson 2.-18 "could be larger" but your are correct, uncertainty surrounding it's size is greater than 50%. Ty for the education.
This star isn't that large. The star is fairly big in terms of physical size of it's corona and photosphere but it's not the largest by any stretch of the term. When you talk about the size of a star you normally talk about it's mass. Because nearly all main sequence stars will get to the red giant and red super-giant phase and get this large. At only 25 solar masses this star (while 25x the mass of the Sun) is meh in relative terms. Once you get into truly massive stars such as those that weigh in at 100 solar masses or more ... that's when things get cosmically spicy.
as mind blowing as it sounds there is absolutely zero proof for these claims. I wanna believe just as much as you but there is simply no way to tell how big a star is. Spectroscopic analysis, parallax measurement, Stellar Luminosity, main sequence turnoff point are all indirect methods and can only result in best guesswork.
St2-18 was calculated to be 2105x based on a specific distance. However that distance is possibility wrong so that will significantly affect the size calculation.
@@gammafilterwrong, research has shown that it's probably not a member of the Stephenson 2 cluster, making its distance uncertain and therefore the radius as well. Additionally, the limit of star radius shown by Steller Evolution models is about 1500 solar radii, making a star 2000 times larger impossible
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
This feels like I'm learning about space from a fourth grader telling me about a space video they just watched in school
The universe is mind blowing 😮
Liked, subscribed and notifications are on! I LOVE BRIGHT SIDE Universe so so much!
I subscribed
Stars larger than woh g64:
Nml cygni: 1640 suns
Iras 05280-6910: 1367 - 1736 suns
Vx sagittarii: 1350 - 1940 suns
M31-rv: 2000 suns
Godzilla: 430 - 2365 suns
Stephenson 2-18: 2150 suns (might be overestimated)
Woh g17: 2955 suns (extreme overestimation)
N6946-bh1: 1217 - 2720 suns (collapsed into black hole)
@@SyDatNguyen-r4j NML Cygni is smaller at around 1350 solar radii, IRAS 05280-6910 is 1367 solar radii, VX Sagitarii is about 1480 solar radii (1940 solar radii estimates are very old), M31-RV is a luminous red nova that ended, Godzilla got downsized with JWST data, Stephenson 2-18 is overestimated, WOH G17 is a foreground star, N6949-BH1 is a luminous red nova or a failed supernova, either way its not that large anymore and doesn't count
@@SyDatNguyen-r4j was gunna tell you how wrong you were then I realized you were talking about radii not mass. Good comment
Dam Pluto would be habitable with a star that bright😅
I believe Pluto would be consumed would it not? 🤔 If VY Canis Majoris would swallow Jupiter this one should swallow Pluto possibly
@NoobSaibotMK666 Pluto is way further back then Jupiter, and the video said Saturn would be the new mercury, that would make Pluto the new 3rd rock from the sun
@@NoobSaibotMK666 pluto is at the nearest approach (Perihelion) 30 AU from the Sun..Jupiter is 5 AU. So probably James is right, haha...
Pluto would melt into lava
How do these massive giants not collapse sooner than they do? Absolutely astonishing that a star like this is even possible. Wow!
Stephenson 2-18 Hold my beer
Downsized
wait tilll mommy WOH G64 explodes we will get caught in it
@@LongLostGrumbleKing its not even in our galaxy, we wouldn't even get caught in it
@@Ooflanddoesntmapalot of stephson explode stephson is in the midle of galxy
@@LongLostGrumbleKing big daddy uy scuti laughing at the babies
Have you guys made an origin of elements video? Like a video explaining how the elements of the periodic table are made?
I love how this has the same exact title as the video V101 SPACE as made
V101 Space made this video 8 months ago. Old news with inaccurate information.
Nice docu, but what about Stephenson 2-18 and UY-Scuti?
How about stepheon 218?
Why would the black holes drift away from each other?
Only five minutes on the topic in the title. Barely better than clickbait.
Yeah, WOH.
Woh G64 that’s the name
Most supergiants are in their death throes, no? Destined to go nova…
Not every star has the mass needed to go supernova. For instance, our sun is too small to end its life with a supernova. It will eventually shed its outer layers and form a planetary nebula like the Crab Nebula and the core will turn into a white dwarf. When it starts to exhaust its nuclear fuel and eventually form iron, which needs more energy to fuse any further, so it can no longer sustain the radiation pressure to keep it from being crushed by gravity, which will collapse the core into a hot dense white dwarf that will slowly cool and dim over trillions of years. Before this, it will cool down and expand into a red giant. Stars with at least ten times the mass of the sun are potentially going to end their life in a supernova and collapse into a neutron star, and if it’s more massive then it will become a black hole
That phase is still 10s of millions of years
That second narrator used to be the voice in kid's toy commercials.
Stars varry so much during their lifespan, the leaderboard for volume will constantly change forever.
I pooped today
I'm pooping right now...and I'm done.
@@kingklank6732lmao I’m actually pooping as I read this. It’s multiverse poops
I prolapsed in on myself
I wonder how long would be a year on a planet orbiting the habitable zone of this star
So....a giant barbecue !
It’s like a cloud of plasma than a star
Nope you got ads
How can a red supergiant be bigger than red hypergiant?
I LOVE Science! And when it comes to the Cosmos, we Puny Humans are REALLY put in our place! 😊
goodnight everyone
The magetic field will get "Tarnished"? It's a magnetic field, Not a set of silverware lol.
[Corrected]
[Not] Fake news..
UY sciti is ~1700x [~909x based on a 2023 measurment] and
Stephenson 2-18 is [theorized to be ] ~2150x our suns radius [but its size and location is still in debate]
[I] might want to do more research... woh g64 is [the] big[gest.Thanks for the great vedio.I initially thought this was incorrect info, but doing my own sanity check shows it's accurate.]
UY Scuti was downsized to 900 solar radii and Stephenson 2-18 radius is unknown as it was found that the star isn't a part of the cluster Stephenson 2, making its distance uncertain at the moment
You might want to do more research...
WOH G64 is the largest known star ar 1540 solar radii, close to the star radius limit shown by evolutionary models - about 1500 solar radii
@xstar9567 sir, I stand corrected. Great research. Wikipedia has UY scuti 909 solar radia.radiation. Stephenson 2.-18 "could be larger" but your are correct, uncertainty surrounding it's size is greater than 50%. Ty for the education.
@xstar9567 thanks i corrected my initial comment.
I thought the wolf Stevenson star was larger.
Buy WOH G64 NOW!
They should rename it W-OMG-64 ! 😅
This star isn't that large. The star is fairly big in terms of physical size of it's corona and photosphere but it's not the largest by any stretch of the term. When you talk about the size of a star you normally talk about it's mass. Because nearly all main sequence stars will get to the red giant and red super-giant phase and get this large. At only 25 solar masses this star (while 25x the mass of the Sun) is meh in relative terms. Once you get into truly massive stars such as those that weigh in at 100 solar masses or more ... that's when things get cosmically spicy.
Good learning but can you calm down on all the flashy lights? It literally triggered my seizures...
Stevenson - 18 is is the biggest star in the universe now
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Low key hate the guy that starts talking at 5:50, just the way he talks like their in a kids show
Binary stars kissing each other.
as mind blowing as it sounds there is absolutely zero proof for these claims. I wanna believe just as much as you but there is simply no way to tell how big a star is. Spectroscopic analysis, parallax measurement, Stellar Luminosity, main sequence turnoff point are all indirect methods and can only result in best guesswork.
That's like saying evolution is just a guess because you can't actually see it.
Just your name, calls your statement into question, "god-ned"
Lol it's actually called Woh!
Damn, anyways in 1 year I’ll be coming back to this comment and see how many likes a get.
You can edit your own comments
Well that's pretty pathetic
DanBris76's Original Comment
"Damn, anyways in 1 year I'll be coming back to this
comment and see how many likes a get"
@@kingklank6732 problem solved 👍🏽
Um, why? You should find more important things to do.
Stephenson 3-18 is 2150 times the sun
downsized to 800x
Its going to generate a splendid black hell
Nope Stephenson 2-18 is larger
Huh? Stephenson 2-18 has 2180 sun radius, thus, WOH G64 Is nott the biggest star
Stephenson 2-18 also would eat saturn
Moore Donna Hall Jose Allen Susan
What about Stephenson 2-18? This is fake news.
downsized to 800x size of the sun
Another non-existing fantasy object. Rumor of another scientific miracle to satisfy the hungry believers.
I admit this isn't the most clever statement.But it spells who backward
How?
Well… if you swap h and o you get who… but, not backwards…. WOH …
well he did say it wasn't the most clever statement lol
"This isn't the most clever statement..."
At least you know it wasn't clever lol
@@LexyThomas134 True, it's hard to criticize when he points it out, haha.
Its so amazing how much flipping matter is clustered up to form these incubators
Stephenson 2 -18 is bigger so tus video is misinformation
St2-18 was calculated to be 2105x based on a specific distance. However that distance is possibility wrong so that will significantly affect the size calculation.
@@gammafilterwrong, research has shown that it's probably not a member of the Stephenson 2 cluster, making its distance uncertain and therefore the radius as well. Additionally, the limit of star radius shown by Steller Evolution models is about 1500 solar radii, making a star 2000 times larger impossible
Wrong, Stephenson 2-18 is not bigger than WOH G64
downsized
also woh g64 COULD have been in 2500x bigger than the sun
@@DeeeepSugaShow it couldn't, that's an outdated estimate