2021 Hyundai Kona N Line 0-100km/h & engine sound

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • 2021 Hyundai Kona N Line 0-100km/h & engine sound. Head over to performancedri... for the full review.
    2021 Hyundai Kona N Line
    1.6-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder
    146kW (199PS) and 265Nm
    Seven-speed dual-clutch auto, all-wheel drive
    For more stats and test results simply head over to our performance data page: performancedriv...
    If you're interested in buying a new car, we can help you. Our car buying team has saved buyers thousands of dollars. We do the haggling for you. Interested? Simply provide us with some details here so we can get in touch: performancedriv...

Комментарии • 63

  • @PDriveTV
    @PDriveTV  2 года назад +11

    Exciting stuff starts at 2:30

  • @JKV.
    @JKV. 2 года назад +3

    remember guys its N line, not a kona n

    • @GlenAnderson71
      @GlenAnderson71 6 месяцев назад

      yep , my kona N does just under 6 secs, would smoke a N line with ease ,there still a nice car though

  • @TheHayabusa09
    @TheHayabusa09 2 года назад +17

    Today, the 2022 Suzuki Vitara Turbo (FWD) was also previewed..It was timed at 8.22secs (0-100KPH)!! The AWD Vitara takes a further .40 secs to same speed and does the quarter mile in 16.32secs. I wouldn't be happy having forked out 45k for the Kona and the P-Plater in the Vitara smokes me at the lights every time! Just saying...

    • @user-vk4vd7vr5t
      @user-vk4vd7vr5t 2 года назад +3

      How is doing the same 0-100 time “smoking” someone? 0.3 secs is practically nothing.

    • @user-vk4vd7vr5t
      @user-vk4vd7vr5t 2 года назад +1

      Further, pdrive has not tested the 2022 Vitara Turbo

    • @michaeljones7497
      @michaeljones7497 2 года назад

      Cry baby

    • @robertceroli3512
      @robertceroli3512 2 года назад

      @@user-vk4vd7vr5t or drive have test a few vitaras in turbo and na the 22 Vitara has the eng transmission as the previous so wouldn't expect any change in the 0 100

    • @TheHayabusa09
      @TheHayabusa09 2 года назад

      @@user-vk4vd7vr5t well for one, the Kona is labelled as a 'small hot hatch SUV' whereas the Vitara is a small SUV. Still, going to get beaten every time!

  • @swatstudio
    @swatstudio 2 года назад +2

    This specyfic car was broken? Almost 1s slower. Maybe you did not press acceleration pedal full?

  • @lukuscannon9697
    @lukuscannon9697 2 года назад +4

    For some reason I expected that car to have some kind of exhaust note 🤔

    • @mikehill6099
      @mikehill6099 2 года назад

      Love my Kona N-line, but absolutely is the worst part about it, closely followed by the absence of paddle shifters.

  • @FoamFlingingHS
    @FoamFlingingHS 2 года назад +15

    Those gear shifts are pretty slow for a dual-clutch

    • @user-fo8fr8wn7v
      @user-fo8fr8wn7v 2 года назад

      I think so very slow than old version dual-clutch

    • @tonys8243
      @tonys8243 2 года назад +1

      Setup for economics on fuel a distance second for sport.

    • @JacobHall1601
      @JacobHall1601 2 года назад

      I just bought an i30 N line Hatch and I’ve driven both sedan and hatch version and the same Engine and DCT work much better in those cars, not to sure what they did differently here but the performance is clearly not as aggressive

  • @HughesyTech
    @HughesyTech 2 года назад +4

    146kW? What is up with Hyundai. They appear to be de-tuning the 1.6 turbo engine.
    New Tucson turbo only has 13x kW down from the usual 150kW

    • @davidcosgrove2625
      @davidcosgrove2625 2 года назад

      It's not detuned at all, it's up 20 hp from the previous 1.6. But the fact none of those who owned one had a clue it rates higher in HP than factory rating. Dyno on the old 1.6 t 193 whp, no tuning all stock. So 195 will most likely be over 200 plus. These are tunable engines.

    • @HughesyTech
      @HughesyTech 2 года назад

      @@davidcosgrove2625 for the old Kona. I'm talking about the engine that's 150kW/265Nm in i30 N Line / Cerato GT etc. And I'm talking about factory, not Dyno which 95% of people won't do.
      Sheesh.

  • @mr.mendez8370
    @mr.mendez8370 2 года назад +3

    Normaly the Kona 1.6 199 HP does the 0-100 in 7.5 sec. I don't know how you do it in 1 sec slower

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад

      Yes, we were wondering the same thing. It seems the latest DCT calibration doesn’t really allow a quick/abrupt take off. Once it is off the line it feels much quicker than the time suggests. Hope that helps.

  • @beardedbiker
    @beardedbiker 2 года назад +4

    Weird, isn’t this almost the same engine as a Cerato GT? But it’s about 2 seconds slower? The Kona is a bit heavier, but that’s quite a noticeable difference.

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад +2

      Yes, we tried really hard to find quicker times with this one (ran about 7 different tests with the Vbox). But the transmission just doesn't cater for swift initial take-offs. It's obviously very quick through the gears, though. If it had launch control like the Sonata N Line, or if the transmission calibration was a bit more abrupt (like in the Kia), we have no doubt it could dip into 6.5-6.8 region.

    • @beardedbiker
      @beardedbiker 2 года назад +1

      @@PDriveTV I guess they’re trying to provide a decent enough gap between the N-Line and the N, so customers are more inclined to go higher up the range, even though this car could be faster. Cheeky!

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад +2

      @@beardedbiker Interesting point. We didn’t think of that! This car is pretty fast though, it’s just getting off the line it takes a second or so.

    • @beardedbiker
      @beardedbiker 2 года назад +3

      @@PDriveTV Yeah that’s a fair point. I guess if people see on paper though that this does 0-100 in 6.5, and the N does 0-100 in 5.5, I think the majority would feel as though 6.5 is enough juice!

    • @benslater9431
      @benslater9431 2 года назад

      @@beardedbiker I think you may have just hit the nail on the head. I have an '18 Kona DCT Turbo with only the 130kw version. I consistently hit 4.6-4.8 60-110km/h runs and low 7secs for 0-100km/h.

  • @user-nh9gd8er8i
    @user-nh9gd8er8i 2 года назад +1

    Less then Vitara 1.4????

  • @stevepugzz3477
    @stevepugzz3477 2 года назад +2

    I’ll like you to test the new M5 Cs if you have that available that car is amazing

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад +1

      Request noted. We'll see what we can do!

    • @stevepugzz3477
      @stevepugzz3477 2 года назад

      Ok cool but these videos are very good well done

    • @stevepugzz3477
      @stevepugzz3477 2 года назад

      Also I’m from Victoria in Australia is this filmed in the outback Victoria or nsw

  • @Pittaz
    @Pittaz 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for the upload

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад

      No worries :) Any other cars you'd like to see us test?

  • @Jash-0p
    @Jash-0p 2 года назад

    how about isuzu dmax 1.9?

  • @Twin.motors
    @Twin.motors 2 года назад +1

    8.52 is pretty weak tbh.... The Kona EV would demolish this "sporty" Kona

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад

      EV test coming soon :)

    • @jacobgaysawyer337
      @jacobgaysawyer337 Год назад

      haha weak? test drive it, it's no weak by any means lmao.

  • @matteomazzamuto4787
    @matteomazzamuto4787 2 года назад

    are you sure 200 hp? i know the 120 and the 160 hp engines... after those we arrive till the N version 280 cv... so i'm confused. ok btw thanks

    • @PDriveTV
      @PDriveTV  2 года назад +1

      Yes, in Australia the Kona N Line 1.6 turbo produces 146kW (199PS/196hp). Hope that helps :)

    • @matteomazzamuto4787
      @matteomazzamuto4787 2 года назад +1

      @@PDriveTV shit in italy we have so much taxes... i'd like try that engine on a Kona, but i will not buy for a C segment. I have I20 N, a perfect car, i'm in love with her =)

  • @waleed172
    @waleed172 2 года назад

    How many revs at cruising 130kmh

    • @waleed172
      @waleed172 2 года назад

      @南川あさかチャンネル thats too much

  • @grandandroid6283
    @grandandroid6283 2 года назад +1

    Not impressive at all! However the 2.0 turbo is quite exciting

  • @dreamernawid
    @dreamernawid 2 года назад

    J’ai crèmè

  • @fale892
    @fale892 2 года назад

    These 3D screens are so ugly. Keep it old school

  • @zayniddinturgunboyev9733
    @zayniddinturgunboyev9733 2 года назад

    Please check out Chevrolet Malibu 2.0 turbo.

  • @joepeluso3864
    @joepeluso3864 2 года назад +2

    Slow and expensive and small

    • @robertceroli3512
      @robertceroli3512 2 года назад +1

      Mazda CX5 with the bigger 2.5 na or any other suv with those power outputs are around that 40k mark unless it's Chinese

    • @joepeluso3864
      @joepeluso3864 2 года назад +1

      @@robertceroli3512 you can’t compare a Cx-5 to this slightly jacked up jazz.

    • @davidcosgrove2625
      @davidcosgrove2625 2 года назад +1

      Mazda 2.5 only achieves 250 with Premium fuel only and in no way is tunable, no one tunes the Mazda

  • @FocusRS500
    @FocusRS500 2 года назад

    Man this car is slow..
    Why bother...

  • @kox7929
    @kox7929 2 года назад

    Слабовато

  • @index6738
    @index6738 2 года назад

    What, ugh…..another chics mall crawler, sounds crap.