The UK is Trying to Outlaw Encryption
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- In this video I discuss how the United Kingdoms "Online Safety Act" would require tech companies to implement backdoors into their encryption algorithms in order to comply with requirements to do proactive scanning for illegal content.
My merch is available at
based.win/
Subscribe to me on Odysee.com
odysee.com/@Al...
₿💰💵💲Help Support the Channel by Donating Crypto💲💵💰₿
Monero
45F2bNHVcRzXVBsvZ5giyvKGAgm6LFhMsjUUVPTEtdgJJ5SNyxzSNUmFSBR5qCCWLpjiUjYMkmZoX9b3cChNjvxR7kvh436
Bitcoin
3MMKHXPQrGHEsmdHaAGD59FWhKFGeUsAxV
Ethereum
0xeA4DA3F9BAb091Eb86921CA6E41712438f4E5079
Litecoin
MBfrxLJMuw26hbVi2MjCVDFkkExz8rYvUF 
Наука
Privacy is a HUMAN RIGHT.
They could stop gangs with the tools they already have.
but they dont want to be called racist so they wont do a damn thing
@@dont.beknown5622 That's not how it works....
@@dont.beknown5622We can wiretap phones since long before the internet and opening letters is an even older thing.
Organized crime is still a thing tho....
The laws that are restricting privacy are imho in general either written by uneducated fools or by educated ppl mislabeling the potential use.
TLDR: This law will catch no one that wouldn't have been catched without it.
i mean those tools use many 0days and things that are against the privacy of everyone
Or stop getting in the way of citizens handling it themselves even
I need privacy not because my actions are questionable but because your judgment and intentions are.
Fundamental to privacy is the right to choose what information I share and with whom I share it.
What about the children? You horrible monster, of course you didn't thought about them...
Nicely said...
That’s a very good take on it
EXACTLY THIS
good take man
*"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." -- Albert Camus*
"Shoot them in the head" - Abraham Lincoln [citation needed]
Eww, no.
Love Camus
@@-..._-. Yes, because love can be forced.
Not a single second of the what you might be doing to that person while you’re assaulting them.
You people are so fucking stupid.
@@Stopinvadingmyhardware Pardon..?
Those who say they don't care about online privacy because they have "nothing to hide" don't realise that's akin to saying "i don't care about freedom of speech because I have nothing to say."
"I don't care about democracy because I am not interested in politics"
But people do think like that. Most people really don't have anything to say and so don't care about freedom of speech being infringed. The reason they don't care about digital privacy is because they're stupid and don't understand that your digital presence is an extension of your real life, not just a video game you play with your phone. These people wouldn't want transparent houses, yet they think it's fine to have a transparent digital house because "it's not real." That's how people think.
Next time a friend says that to me I will just ask them for their ID, credit card information, emails, passwords and ask them if they are okay with me using their private audio messages in our DMs to clone their voice with an AI program so I can use that to create fake evidence that incriminates them for something they didn’t do or say.
the whole "nothing to hide" came from ironically the UK bringing in security cameras
Those people should live in a house made of glass walls and post their bank account login credentials on the internet, hopefully that would teach them
So the government is trying to train the public to trust them and it’s no big deal. Sounds a lot like grooming to me.
Quite ironic
When there's power there's always grooming . The cycle continues once more.
And what a wonderful track record they have. *We don't trust the government. They trust us.*
All while being quiet about his majesty rubbing dicks with Epstein.
Nothing screams "protecting the child" more than making sure that everything that a child says online is public
I say start calling America and EU-ran countries the "western regimes". They are clearly not free countries, and that term is nice and reusable just like how our politicians use loaded terms / name calling to silence their opponents. So it's only fair.
@@s1nistr433 Uk is not an EU-ran country.
@@undermind0657the UK is a European country smooth brain. EU also stands for European, not just European Union.
@@undermind0657 you reckon Brexit stopped that or changed how it's done?
Just because the US, EU and Commonwealth are, frankly speaking, totalitarian garbage, doesn't mean that any meaningful alternatives with a decent level of development exist at all. There are other totalitarian and/or savage dumpsters that often feature "fires" and "nuclear waste" on top. If you want to be free and have privacy then, you have to be rich. No other way
Gotta love boomers trying to outlaw privacy. What a classic.
The Conservative philosopher Sam Francis described it as "Anarcho-tyranny." The UK government has no intention of applying this to themselves or their favored supporters. It's a bludgeon to use on free speech, religious and right wing activists. Nothing more.
Boomers have sold out their children and actively continue doing so. Worst generation to ever live.
these are not boomers dude, boomers don't even know what encryption is ffs, those are gen X, the latchkey generation trying to control what everyone does, quite ironic.
Takes the whole, "this is my house, my rules" to an other level.
maybe we should visit those politicians in their private bedrooms and tell them they got nothing to hide
The sad thing about “helping the kids” exuse is that its not hard to find these people its actually shockly easy, the gov just dont care and even when there caught they just get let out
Or, most of them aren’t nearly involved as they say they are, and it’s actually those in power who are hurting these kids.
@m0ff607 no i think those people are as involved, but i do think you're right that certain powers get some type of personal gains from letting it continue without real resistance.
Government is the ones involved.
They all need to be removed
Well government are like the Royals they don't like convicting their own people. But use that fear to convict other in to doing as they say. Masks anybody?
@@m0ff607 funny isn't it how a wealthy son of the Queen can buy off grooming allegations. "One rule for them" and all that...
PRETTY BASED BAN THE ENTIRE UK FROM THE INTERNET THEY DONT HAVE A LOICENSE
OI
Oi mate, ya go't a loicence for that encryption.
@@dedr4m what was happening with male humans in the 2010s?
OI VATS NOT FARE BRUV NA IM NOT AVIN VAT
Bongposters btfo.
I'll never understand why the UK assumes banning things makes them actually disappear.
It's worked for a lot of things in the past- we still have a lot of heavy regulations that the US doesn't (because of rampant corporate capitalism) that have been a boon for society, but yeah, this is just straight propanganda pretending to fix a problem (that the government inherently created in the first place) to justify actually have power and control over something else entirely.
It's not about stopping crime, it's about making normal people into criminals.
Its about protecting the elite
Yeah bro remember those hoverboards from like 2016😂
Didn't work with drugs 😂
This bill being written in the first place *reeks* of an admission that they are struggling to decypt message logs as is. What on earth are they doing across the pond?
Don’t they know you just grab the device owner and throw them into a black site. Smh USA leading the way again
Jack shit that's what they do
Think about it, if you had an unknown exploit for a major encryption algorithm, you couldn't just start using it willy-nilly. As soon as you start using information that you've decrypted, your targets *will* notice and switch to a new algorithm, so you have to use your exploit sparingly and with great discretion.
I don't think it's a case of not being able to decrypt things, it's a case of being able to use that decrypted info in a legal way. Hence they create this bullshit. Clearly, there are better ways to solve that problem. We are pretty good at cracking codes over here my friend. If we have a problem it is the utter passivity of the population.
@@tissuepaper9962enigma Christopher moment
I'm British and I can tell you that my government is starting to become more & more like it was in "V for Vendetta" everyday.
Hell there was once a proposal to make a national curfew for men, but it never went through, luckily.
And that "national curfew for men" was proposed as a result of a policeman completely abusing the draconian covid laws that were pushed through.
Could you imagine all the male coppers who I see doing actual police work having to enforce that hahaha
Nice, time to gender transition from men to woman.
@@KatyaAbc575abuse the system 😎
@@KatyaAbc575 man to women
Unless you are multiple people stacked in a trench coat
Funny since every known system uses encryption of some type. This will go over well.
I'm just gonna put this out here; Data breaches are probably going to be infinitely worse if this gets passed, and I hope that any damages caused by this bill are directed to the people behind this.
@@GSFigure yep, i work part time at a cyber security company and MAN would we make a fuckton of money by breaching companies networks if they actually made that law (legally ofc) because they are so easy to get into when you completely wipe out every encryption method. it would be so insanely easy to hack insanely huge companies, even such a simple thing as removing https would be devastating in such situations
So they are waiting for some corporations to lobby against this bill. Which means more money for the government.❓
@GSFigure lets wait for big companies to reject this bill and or they agree and databreaches happen willy nilly.
That way it will be reverted.
@@iluvpandas2755 waiting for people to get screwed over by a databreach doesn't seem like a win...
It’s just like my favorite book, “Please Don’t Collapse Into An Authoritarian Nghtmare Hellscape, Guys” by George 1984well.
They're using 1984 as an instruction manual
There's a reply to this comment but I can't see it 👁
@@electron6825 if it was mine I said they're using it as a playbook
@@electron6825youtube hides some replies and comments unless you sort by new.
Less "collapse into" and more "successfully consolidate into"
how the gov can be so out of touch with tech reality, i can't understand
Because there is no age limit and boomers still think they know everything because they had "experience", maybe veterans yeah, I respect them than any buffoon politician
They're not out of touch, they know exactly what they're doing. After all, digital privacy is anti-Semitic
And central bank digital currency..
@@paegrelaborate.
@@paegr 💀💀💀💀💀
"Unless the UK wants to go full Iran"
Britanistan is one step closer to becoming real
well there are 2b muslim
Londonistan has already existed since the 2000s.
jokes on you, in Persian we call England, Engelestan
Britanistan would translate to land of the british people
Imagine criminalizing mathematics AND graffiti.
@@saurabhsrivastvdoes something akin to a soul exists inside you ?
@@kvdrr Why ask the question when you know the answer?
@@kvdrr isn’t grafitti just vandalism? Why do you think it’s okay?
@@kvdrr I just think that Grafiti should raise its standard. So much dumb bs people make sometimes
Well, multiplying a negative by another negative gives a positive, so just make mathematical graffiti :P
Next they will try installing cameras in everyone's houses because who knows what illegal activities could possibly be going on in the house?
It's called a smart tv😂
I believe something like 1/3 of zoomers were in favour of having cameras installed in every home "to stop domestic abuse".
Its Alexa in your house.
"John Spartan, you have been fined for violating verbal morality statute."
They don't need to "try" if they already have a backdoor into our smartphones.
@@MrEdrftgyuji Next generation is fucked in that case
So, no more https? Shall we.... send passwords in clear text too?
Why send it in clear text when we can use ✨Caesar cipher ✨
And cybercrime skyrockets while the government still gets to keep it's secrets
@@Nativeunderscore (decodes immediately)
Funnily enough there are passwords that are probably worth storing as plain text. It is like one of those plastic locks.
Just imagine the internet going back to the 90's level of encryption.
Anyone who knows how to use SSH and FTP protocols becomes a digital demigod overnight.
Passing a law in hope of scaring criminals away...
Definition of Criminals : "Those who breaks law"
Passing A law to be able to imprison anyone criticizing the government by looking at their search history without context ✅
As someone from the UK this bill and other similar stuff our country has tried to pass terrifies me. Honestly the UK creeps me out more and more the longer im here as they introduce and try to push for more control over people. Any advice for someone worried?
Its basically Time to get rid of this uk government as we know it, and put actual Normal moral, working class decent people in control!! just literally swap them over from creeps and rich groomers to moral strong men and women. That would make a hell of a difference.
Let’s move to Japan.
ironicly id say come to the USA we are generally more free here.
@@NoahGooder tbh i did think about moving but sadly at my current time its not the most feasable. For all the glow in the dark jokes America does sound a lot more free especially when Americans tend to put up a fight against stupid bills being passed.
UK Civil War, but have the dumb gun happy Americans fight the war so we can simultaneously solve two problems.
I don't know if the UK has similar health protection policies as HIPPA, but this will REALLY throw a wrench into it.
The NHS which has all their health data is already a branch of the government, so the government over there probably have all the access they need already to that data.
Yeah they don't care
This is the government that willingly and covertly gave the health data of millions of NHS user to Google so I doubt they care too much.
@@More_Row Especially if you are in the Weimerican military
There are concerns that some aspects won't be GDPR compliant, but since it will massively increase the scope of what could be criminal (e.g. posting content that has the "potential to cause harm"), it's probably all fine. Sure you'll lose all privacy, but it's done in a legitimate way.
They can't keep anyone safe IRL why would they think they can help on line?
It's about removing freedom and controlling everything that is post online.
@@IskenderCaglarM41B441 1984 is gonna be real in the UK. Or half life 2, either one works though
I need privacy, not because i have something to hide, but because i don't trust their dirty hands on my personal content.
This stuff is basically: oh, you have a door in your house? Are you hiding a dead body in there?
@@bettercalldelta yes - if you don't trust me then I don't trust you
They already have a back door
For the UK govt to say that anything they do is to protect children, is levels of sheer fucking audacity beyond belief.
Their local police stations not only already knew about the rape gangs, they would refuse to investigate the issues further and said that the young girls involved "had made a lifestyle choice"
Even when a girl who escaped after she was assaulted, went to the cops and told them what happened, they turned her away. She was picked up by her abusers hours later.
They were under orders not to investigate or prosecute harshly for fear of appearing racially discriminatory. They stopped recording race/ethnicity of the perpetrators, "so as not to incite racial hatred."
Heads should roll, literally, for what they have done and the decades of what they have permitted.
They are complicit that safe to assume at this point outrageous
People put them in power. Therefore, that's exactly what the majority in the UK wants.
If you live there, you better leave because it won't get any better.
Our government is the criminals and paedophiles, just like our Royals. From a tech point of view I can't wait I never have to work again because as soon as those door are open I hacking the F out of every famous person who has to much money. I'll start with the peado's at the BBC, lol
🎉🎉🎉🎉
They should call it the Prince Andrew child protection act.
That's how personal data leak happen in Thailand when police have full access to personal data, excuse 'for finding criminal reason'. There's several times citizen catch them sell data to criminal.
Another reason we shouldn't trust police
@@davidrozier1126 Criminals these days have uniform, you know...
It'S fOr ThE cHiLdReN!
Sure give authorities the encryption keys and soon after criminals have them also. Say goodbye to internet security and privacy. Let any eavesdropper know your login details for anything you do online… say goodbye to your life savings and say hello to identity theft. Decisions about technology should be left in the hands of competent people of which governments are not.
Say hello to gangs being able to track your movements via your conversations to easily kidnap you.
What if we did encryption *before* putting text on platforms?
Offline encryption before posting online would solve this
Entropy analysis v&
Terrorists are probably already doing this.
too much work for the average normie, you can communicate by pigeon if you want but no one will and so anyone who does can be singled out and targeted.
It's like most things involving privacy - they only need to make it annoying enough that most people will eventually get tired of doing it, or make exceptions. Like how noscript makes most websites break completely because of the proliferation of javashit, or how switching to alt tech is too much of a hassle for the average normie. If you put enough hoops in front of someone and a goal (in this case privacy) the majority of people will eventually get so tired of jumping through the hoops that they have won anyway, even if the goal is still technically achievable.
solutions for this exist, i tested an android keyboard like this with a friend, however it's extremely cumbersome to use, but in theory if you want you can have e2ee over ye olde texts
Idk what's worse that a country that's laws leak into my own are trying to pass laws like this, or the fact that a law won't be able to be passed, because a couple big name companies decide to starve them out. Feels like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
I hate to side with the companies, but yeah.
Take this with a grain of salt....
There was a time the eu wanted to require a confirmation before one could post a link. Good guy Google was like: ain't gonna happen.
The uk is a company unfortunately
I'll decrypt it, it will just take a billion years or so. Plus minus a few powers, depending on the algorithm, I'll just have a tiny backlog, roughly like any government service.
What's really insane about this is that in the UK, a warrant already gives the police a legal right to demand decryption keys from a user suspected of illegal activity. If the user withholds the keys, they can go to prison for up to 5 years. We already have a law that covers this, I don't understand the point of this law if a warrant is still required, and if a warrant isn't required under this new law that's a whole new level of privacy violation.
Another problem, say the U.K wants a key to the encryption. But the E.U and the U.S.A, far more powerful economies; don’t want the apps to have such broken encryption. They tell the companies that if they do that to their encryption for the U.K, they are no longer allowed to use and sell those apps in their economies. Those companies are not going to do it. The bigger markets are simply worth more then the U.K, it is, simply not worth it. Then Britain’s only choice is to ban the apps. Yeah, that’s going to go over well at the next general election.
I only read positive things, where is the problem?
@@nootnoot42another problem for that law
@@nootnoot42to be fair, he didnt say it was a bad thinf
@@k_otey just wanted to be snorky, sorry if I offended anyone.
@@nootnoot42 Its ok, I meant my statement was meant as a list of positive reasons why this won't happen. It just shows that the politicians pushing this law are, 1) evil, 2) don't know how encryption works and, 3) don't know how economics works.
Oh this will go well. I'm excited to watch. This is how powerful people sow dissent in their constituents. This is the kind of thing that pisses people off enough to drop the established system and start lighting themselves on fire in protest.
You say that but the Tories have done horrific things but still have a chokehold on the country
@@Ed.E
This guy is hopeful...
Cattle will not do anything 😂
You idiots would rather light yourself on fire than actually fight the government what a bunch of feggits
You don't understand the world my friend
@Ed.E You forget that all of this was started by Labour in 1997. The only reason people vote Tory is that they know Labour will be worse, and a vote for a third party is a vote for Labour. The joys of a two party system.
As long as people keep voting for the main four/five parties, then this will continue.
This is like if there was a law mandating all locks now need to include a combo dial that accepts 1 specific code. If the police need to access what's locked, they'll be temporarily taught that code.
"Temporarily"
1234
and the combo is 1234 or something because governments can't into security
@@bettercalldelta I laugh when I see passwords in government, like are we seriously going to use the equivalent of 1234 for classified design files? And I get it for those, the password itself is not classified, and you'd need the physical disk too, but if you have to send us the password anyways you might as well make it a little more complex.
But I don't know, I mean if they get the password its not going to make a difference what it is, so maybe there is some logic to it, it just seems funny.
@@jakegarrett8109 i remember there was a database leak of some government's ministry of defense and passwords on accounts there were the equivalent of "qwerty123"
They also gave Data access bill in AUS. Which allows the government to send you to jail for 5 years if you refuse to unlock your accounts....
Wow, just wow.
Imagine having a neuralink.
@@fss1704 basically the government doing a $5 wrench attach
British govt read 1984 and got inspired
@@Sneed1488v2 he was also a communist. And your reply got shadowbanned for some reason. RUclips...
Standard Tory MP
My inner sociopath that can suspend morals for the sake of functionality thinks that one way to troll this would be to find ways to trick the algorithms and make it look like everyone has the abhorrent material in question. The people who have to maintain the facade of providing security will overwork the police and security forces, who in turn will stop investigating potential flagged material due to the large amounts of false alarms, which in turn will render the legislation ineffective if no one is there to enforce it (or only enforce, say, 10 to 20%), which could actually make the powers that be look weak and stupid and (hopefully) grant the common person a little more breathing room.
not playing by the rules is a moral necessity in this case imho
Another silly little practical joke would be similar to what a man named Ted did
Making institutions look weak and stupid has pretty bad consequences.
Haha just make a bunch of bots 😂
please give a TLDR
0:26 I wonder how many times we'll hear that one.
"SAY THE LINE, BART!"
*sigh* "We're doing this to protect the children."
"YAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY"
I have a better suggestion for the politicians.
Why not require each criminal to inform the police about their intended criminal activity one week in advance? I think this should do it :)
Allows civilians to clear the area, that's a great idea!
The government should ask people if they are thinking about committing crimes, like with the form that you have to fill in (or is it fill out?) when you are on an aircraft heading for the USA. The form asks if you are visiting the USA in order to engage in terrorism or crime or immoral activity.
it's time to start using carrier pidgeons eh?
Been saying that for years. But people are too greedy, too impatient. They've had it. Fell right into the trap. Years ago.
not even two days later, harriers and eurofighters will begin intercepting them
@@theoneandonlyartyom I was thinking cruise missiles to just obliterate them
Government 101 = Create the problem, have a solution ready that has the appearance of *possibly* fixing that problem. Rinse & repeat.
I think you missed the 2 other steps.
Step ? and losses.
manufacturing consent
@@ibex485
What problem bro?
@@ibex485Least you can defend yourself. Over here if someone comes at me with a knife, I have two options. 1: fight and risk death or 2: run.
@@ibex485 Not from the US, eh? You can use Excel and take all the 'incidents' in a year and take the week leading up to vote (either pro or anti, doesn't matter); the 'incidents' precipitously rise leading up to and including the day of the vote. Nashville was two hours before the floor vote against ATF overreach..
All the dates of everything is online, don't take my word for it.
Just like the poster above you typed, this is literally manufacturing consent.
Hackers: "its free real estate..."
So they’re attempting to set up an MITM/onpath that everyone just knows about and accepts.
It's impossible for companies to do unless they completely change their infrastructure and sacrifice profits.
Take WhatsApp for an example. Your private key is generated and stored on your device. WhatsApp doesn't have access to it.
To comply with the Online Safety Bill, they'd have to somehow collect and store every user's private key.
You'd encrypt your message, send it. WhatsApp would then have to decrypt, verify, inspect, sign, re-encrypt and forward for every message. You'd have to wait for a message instead of getting it near instantly.
This is an inherent flaw of PKI and requires massive amounts of computational power to carry out those processes especially when factoring in secure key sizes. Hence why companies are refusing.
The policy makers are technologically illiterate in sum.
"But think of the children and terrorists" - 🤓
Oh yeah like their border "security" seems like its working
parliament and the crown sure do that’s for fucking certain
But what about terrorist children?
Remember that these laws are made by pedos working for a government that funds terrorists.
@@tanostrelok2323 look at isreal and da kidz with rocks
Every time the UK does something semi respectable they do some shit like this
A note on "warrants" in the UK.
There is a really bad practise over here of rubber stamping certain types of warrant automatically and electronically.
There are some systems over here where the police can just fill in an online form, give a telephone number, and immediately get access to someones mobile data. There is no actual interaction with a judge, it is all automatically processed, assigned a warrant, and data is given, almost incautiously. You just fill in a form, and the "judge" allegedly authorising the warrant never even has to get out of bed.
If the UK government is talking about "warrants" in the context of the Online Safety Bill, this will be the end game. Nobody is going to need to trundle down to the court house and convince a judge. It will be automated, electronic access where warrants are assigned when you hit the "submit" button.
Key Expansion.
Sub bytes.
Shift Rows.
Mix Columns.
Add round key.
Repeat a handful of times.
I think this is a much bigger deal than it first appears. Thank you for keeping the world up to date with protecting our privacy!
Imagine being such a boomer that you keep proposing bills that effectively destroys the internet. And not only one time, but keep proposing it in different ways. Yep that's the Anglo-sphere.
Rishi isn't a boomer though, is he?
@@mildlydispleased3221 I said being a boomer.
@@More_Row That's the Tories for you.
@@mildlydispleased3221 It’s all of them
@@More_Row American moment.
They're also trying to shove in bills in the US to do something similar. the Kids Online Safety Act is due for Markup on the 27th (that means it's up to being voted out of Committee, to which afterwards it goes to the Senate Floor for voting, and it has a LOT of bipartisan support).
Additionally, they're also sneakily trying to sneak in two EARN IT Act copycat bills called S.1199 and the Cooper Davis Act (the latter is focused on drugs, but it has many of the same problems as EARN IT) into a must pass bill called the NDAA. Not entirely sure when it'll happen, but they're trying somepoint between Tuesday and Thursday before the August recess.
Bad Internet Bills, Fight For the Future and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have more information if you need it.
jesus christ, every fucking time a law has children, internet, and safety in it, its always bound to be shit what the hell?
Perhaps this creator should focus more on bills in America than the UK
@@snowheader2200 Europe is more of a focus because American internet is infinitely more free than European internet due to America not adopting net neutrality. Any overreaches in Europe is the warning of a potential similar attempt in other countries (exception of China and Middle Eastern countries which have highest restrictions from day 1). This is also why VPN companies have way more individual customers in Europe than America to bypass the censorship there. Which is ironic because VPN was originally made in America for use in a package as a standardized corporate/military security platform. We have the greatest infrastructure investment into it yet we tend to underutilize it.
Turned Brave ads on again, sent you my entire BAT stash when you announced The Great Sneeding and then opted out for a break.
They clearly don't give a f. about groomings, the bill is about shortening the leash on their own citizens.
5 Eyes beat them to it...
And now AUKUS
9:11 they didn't just remove apps from local appstores, they blocked the whole Play store and App store 😂
They can try, but they won't succeed
It's like removing doors and windows on your houses open all the time so they can just barge in to check if you're a terrorist
Is uk on the same road as australia
I bet my free healthcare that this is going to go absolutely swimmingly with no issues at all.
They really trying to turn into the UK from Watch Dogs Legion
Congrats for the 500k Kenny ! the million sub is closer than ever
"Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of temporary privileges".
1: Governments have zero comprehension of how digital security works. It is yet another instance of morons having the authority to make decissions beyond the reach of their competence and/or qualification.
2: The UK authorities have earned themselves global fame for protecting terrorists and pedophiles against the rights and concerns of victims, regardless of what propagandfa they issue to justify their behavior. Words are meaningless, actions prove true character and intent. Trying to sell us a law that protects AGAINST terrorists and child exploiters contravenes what has been demonstrated by deed to be their true agenda.
The UK was already ranking as one of the top countries for widespread use of mass surveilance along China and the USA.
Earlier this year they passed new laws to make many forms of peaceful protest illegal.
Then there were the preventive arrests before and during the incoronation.
Now this.
At this point I'm just wondering: Where is V?
Was lowkey disappointed he didn't start the vid with "ohhhhh mmaaaaannnnn"
If gang knows gov can just open their conversation like a can, they won't use it. How can they not see that?
Instead of dealing with immigrant gangs UK government would rather abuse security features.
"Is that really worth it?" Well it is for them, because it has nothing to do with the kiddos, and everything to do with detecting and crushing dissent.
OY BRUV, YOU GOT A LOICENSE FOR DAT ENCRYPTION?
Always the same motives. Such good people 😂😂😂
This is one of the few times companies are doing something good for the people.
Its not really for the people, but for the market, this regulation is probably going to make them lose millions or maybe billions of money, which is one of the few things they really care...
Yep
THEY GLOW IN THE DARK
Worldwide absolutely helpless and hopeless (.....)
I live in the UK, we already have lists of banned dogs, lol.
I couldn't possibly be more surprised
"If freedom is outlaw, outlaws will become heroes" ~ equilibrium
C is an easy language to learn, and almost all of the networks are written in it.
And really hard to master
Outlawing encryption is kinda ridiculous though, as it's just math. Even if somehow they were able to cut off people's ability to use RSA encryption to securely send messages, people could still DIY their own encoded way of sending messages. It wouldn't be as bulletproof as a widely adopted security standard, but it would offer *some* protection
And even if encryption were somehow outlawed entirely, what's stopping someone from using a burner phone, or laptop on someone else's public wifi network, or some other means of obtaining anonymous internet access, and using that to achieve privacy? Depending on your use case there might be less of a need to encrypt things if you're just passing the blame onto whoever runs that other network (especially if you're using https, which I assume they wouldn't outlaw because any site that requires a username/password needs that. The internet would be unusable without it, and the standards and means to set up HTTPS isn't going anywhere)
And even if this somehow gets through and passes in the UK, the internet is a global thing, and good luck enforcing a UK law across the globe
The problem is they only need to win once, we need to win every single time.
someday using vpn and linux will lead to jail, oh wait that already hapened in france!
Dystopian
The Labour party want to amend this bill to ban VPNs, so we could get there quite soon too
@@legatelaurie lol thats crazy
brits after their government outlaws encryption:
right… what’s all this then
1:25
Waaay ahead of you on that one.
"In 1939, the British government formed the National Air Raid Precautions Animals Committee (NARPAC) to decide what to do with pets before the war broke out."
[...]
NARPAC published a pamphlet titled "Advice to Animal Owners." The pamphlet concluded with the statement that "If you cannot place them in the care of neighbours, it really is kindest to have them destroyed."🤗
[...]
"Estimates say that over 750,000 pets were killed"
[...]
"Many pet owners, after getting over the fear of bombings and lack of food, regretted killing their pets".
The backdoor is there and already in use. They just want formal authorization.
Almost the same scenario had happened sometime from 2016 through nowadays in Russia.
Long things short, "Yarovaya's package", a series of communications policy corrections targeting information flow, obligating all internet and cell network providers to:
- store ALL data transferred across the devices;
- decrypt user messages on-demand.
A rare yet quintessential display of some officials' retardation regarding IT awareness. Trying to store exabytes of raw data that is 99.9999% of the time is seen as garbage is like leveling a mountain to find a grain of gold. Decrypting any message is outright impossible, it is the nature of any encryption. In 2018, due to constant internet companies complaints that it is not feasible, the policy changes were softened by a lot, and even then it looks like ISPs are slacking as much as possible, since internet prices did not change much.
However, the encryption law was used to target Telegram. The author of Telegram app, Durov, had had a word strongly against Russia and was very pro West at the time. Officials decided to outlaw and block Telegram for, what they claimed, Telegram was used as a messenger by terrorists (the terrorism cases were rare but real) and it was refusing to "hand out decryption keys". The attempt was futile as Durov had a blast, because while attempting to block the app officials caused an internet outage for one or two day, yet Telegram was working fine. Nowadays, Telegram is no longer considered an illegal app nor it is blocked. The law itself is like a malicious compliance made on purpose.
UK is attempting to go through the same troubles, it looks like. I wouldn't be surprised if they would start blocking messengers or force them to collect what isn't there.
The governments allowed groomers to do their jobs. It is as simple as that. In normal times they would have remove the groomers from their futile living but in our times they protect them, similar in a way they protect some royal member(s?) which I will not mention due to their mental deficit to be human.
Governments passing these laws are never interested in stopping criminals. Again, there's more than enough laws existing in any penal code to put away the more notorious criminals already but that would imply to actually do their jobs (in the case of grooming gangs that would imply to stop sending memos to police officers declaring 11 year Olds victims as "professionals having made a life choice and we should really be arresting them for solicitation", that would also imply the police not actively participating in those gangs' activities)
Governments are immune to logical arguments because they lie on everything making dialogue impossible, such that I don't know the use of this video...
Maybe they're just trying to avoid another scandal by cracking down on those who share evidence.
the problem with politicians is that they dont try to understand what they want to regulate. Just write a law and let other people figure out how to do ity without asking anybody if it is possible or should be done.
Nah they know what they are doing, but it's not for your safety.
The UK had ben far gone. Don't they serve arrest warrents for mean messages on Facebook
This bill have been stuck in legislation for years. Parliament isn't back until September, and thankfully everyone knows how controversial it is. A few are using the "won't someone please think of the children", but a large amount see it for what it is. It'll never actually come into law.
I'm not as hopeful as you, Parliament is full of old fucking farts and boomers who don't know shit about tech
I remember read somewhere the whole PKI has a backdoor at algorithm level? Something about large prime distribution curve and only government agency has the resources to figure out. Because PKI keygen depends on that, they have the ability to infer private key.
Any truth to that?
Yeah there's a number no one knows why it exists being used, true.
dedicated criminals can always create tools, idk, use a plugin to decrypt encrypted messages on the screen or something, or even make their own platform, if they get rid of encryption from popular social media platform, they're mostly exposing private data of innocents.
Babe wake up mental outlaw just uploaded
❤
I appreciate your Based approach to everything. Also you inspired me to get chickens again, happened to pick up some 8 week old pullets right when you got your younger batch so mine are nearly ready to lay!
Wake up everyone, if the proposal becomes law, Element and Matrix will move out of the UK soon.
I think you should've moved out of their in the first place
Prison island.
This is the British government saying "We fucked up, now YOU will be held accountable."
*Best way to protect children:* Educate their parents so they do their job
*Best way to protect from terrorists:* Strict immigration policies, so exact opposite of what is in effect now
the ironic part is that the right wing of the UK basically pushed brexit entirely on anti-immigration and freedom grounds, and are now in a worse position thanks to it.
Ay coming back to this 3 months later and this shit passed im sad bro 😢😢😢😢😢
Man I feel like they try to pull this shit every couple of years at a minimum.