After watching so many of these I get chills whenever current leaders of science bring up giants like Einstein, Niels Bohr, Michael Faraday, Maxwell, ect. And you can feel the sadness when they say there names almost like "I wish you were still alive to help us with our 21th century questions." Could you imagine a reaction video of Einstein when MIT first came out with their trillion FPS videos. Einstein would shit himself out of shear excitement,
The academic community did not grudgingly offer Einstein a job until he had demonstrated his superiority and, more importantly, the public found out about it. Today, they would simply censor his work, ensuring he could not satisfy the second condition.
I honestly learn more from these talks and debates than I did in my high school classes. Wonderfully taught, and these physicists make you WANT to learn. Brilliantly made, this Origins project
Agreed, I hated school and almost refused to learn as a misguided form of protest, nowadays at 65yrs of age I consider myself a self-taught polymath and talks and lectures on the net have played a massive part feeding my thirst for knowledge. Curiosity is the secret and no schoolteacher I had stimulated my curiosity!
@Anthony Maurice atheists require evidence which supports beliefs. not faith which requires no evidence. of coarse atheists have beliefs, just not in any evidence-free concepts
@@charonder I am here one month in your future - if you can hear me 'you have to wear masks in the shops now' and please tell your 4 years ago friend that he has only 3.5 years of freedom left!
Why would an all powerful god from any religion reveal himself in only one part of the world to a single race and to the poorest of people, for this simple pattern shows to me that those with nothing to loose had everything to gain from the spread of religion.
He waited hundreds of thousands of years when humanity suffered just to appear in an age when people didn't have cameras, to an illiterate barbaric morally backward society, the least he could do was to appear in our age. I wonder why religious people doesn't think about that, the very idea of gods is ridiculous
You hit the nail! Those who got nothing to loose, literally broke, needs to rely in faith upon themselves that they either believe in they can make next moment bit better or they can stop complaining about how worst they are... And god was invented to provide just that faith. Nothing else, but the faith that is required when you are fighting a loosing battle. You know the probability of winning the lotto, still ask god to score a win.. that god there is hope.. which is just a twisted way of meaning faith...a blind hope is the faith and only god can provide us a hope, even while sinking inside an inescapable black hole.. _Define faith - faith feɪθ/Submit noun 1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something._ Thus, faith doesn't need to be true, you just need to believe that it's the truth. And irony is, no matter how repelled you feel from the word god, you still have to believe in something, may be yourself...which gives you exactly same amount of pleasure/benefit as having faith in god ( of course you have to be bit optimistic ) Thus, I ask is you a god?
I really admire the passion n enthusiasm of Lawrence Krauss..n his work on the Origins Project..hopefully this project will continue..now almost everyone has access to this kind of scientific programmes..
Why are so many religious people in these comments getting so Mad at these people, and not only mad but many of you call these people idiots.. What kind of attitude is that for a moral religious person. If you want people to listen to your religious beliefs, then why can't you listen to these beliefs. The majority of atheists and scientists don't want disprove your God, but it so happens that the evidence they gather doesn't support it. We know the earth is older than 6000 years old.
Great comment. It confuses me no end that as an Atheist, I have been subjected to cold glares, irritation, and outright hostility from relatives who ( I thought) knew and loved me for 30+ years. Fuck 'em. And they are devout Christians who shunned and lied about me, un-friended me on FB, the whole gamut. How do I go from loved to hated, after I came out as a non-believer? It makes no fucking sense.
Very interesting. This is so wonderful. Science is a way of knowing and scientists are adventurers on the quest to knowing. I like how the speakers imply that any idea however wild it may be has a potential of becoming a reality as long as you never give up on testing it, however long it may take, until you have the answers and it is proven to be part of reality or otherwise. This is how scientists should be portrayed in mainstream media - not some mad hermit who always opposes natural remedies, religion, child musings, and anything that he does not believe without even putting an effort in investigating it.
I really wished I'd talked my thumb from my ass and knuckled down and worked at being a scientists. Great respect for these lords and ladies of wisdom!
There are no accidents. There is cause and effect. One or some thing causes the effect of another thing or things. There are many more dimensions, not universes. The energy of space is so small because it is based on smaller, lower dimensions (extra dimensions, sub-quantum dimensions). Excellent explanation Frank!
This is an invitation to see a theory on the nature of time! In this theory we have an emergent uncertain future continuously coming into existence relative to the spontaneous absorption and emission of photon energy. Within such a process the wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons is forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual! The future is unfolding with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment relative to the atoms of the periodic table and the individual wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. As part of a universal process of energy exchange that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life the ‘past’ has gone forever. At the smallest scale of this process the ‘past’ is represented by anti-matter annihilation with the symmetry between matter and anti-matter representing the symmetry between the future and the past as the future unfolds photon by photon. In such a theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with the classical physics of Newton representing processes over a period of time, as in Newton’s differential equations. In my videos I explain how this process is relative to temperature and the phase changes of matter.
Your first 4 lines translated. Just do it! Next 2 lines: what`s done is done. Then i got bored translating the nuances ssso sloowww, light goes and small shit is as well. Dropped things fall..hot! That`s rap and yours sucks. Geez Dick! Nobody speak nobody get choked.
Just realized Lawrence Krauss looks just like that one regeneration specialist from The Fifth Element, the one that says "Perfect" when Milla is being regenerated.
Is God a Magician In my life I was always fascinated with science, specifically. Physics. It is the subject of how the physical world really works, basically how energy matter and time come together using the laws of nature. Growing up and going to a Catholic school you quickly learn God created the world in seven days. Thru the years I struggled with this fact, many refer to God as being a Magician. I was not comfortable with that notion. I always looked at Magician as being phony, they pulled rabbits out of hats. God is a Great Creator he did not need to use magic, but if He chose to HE could. Also I have always enjoyed a good magician performance. Well with our marvelous advancement in the field communication where you can voice opinions on RUclips where many seek to use science for a proof of God. I have to be thankful to the many that helped clear my dilemma “Is God a Magician”. I learned When God wants to be a Magician, He is the ABSOLUTE BEST of all time and He did not use deception. He let all of the so called Scientist up to today to explain LIGHT and they are still in the dark.
francesco The physicist Barbara Brennan is not in the dark. Neither is Ford. They both wrote books explaining how at the core of us and reality are light waves. So since light waves are our core, then everything is magic. What is wrong with saying everything is magic? Imagery and image and imagination are the core of magic. We are constantly created in the image of God. You wonder what God looks like.. We look like God without these bodies. Look at the book "Hands of Light" written by the physicist Barbara Brennan. In this book is what we look like out of these bodies. We look like the God particle or Higgs Boson. From each of the quarks that are spinning as 3 points of light forming what are called protons and neutrons comes us. We are 100% light. We consist of 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 spinning light atoms. We just seem to be solid because what spins so fast looks solid. But we are not solid and nothing is. Look at the article at collective-evolution.com It is titled "Nothing is Solid and Everything is Energy" Then look up the books "The Dumbing Down of America" and "The War Against the Weak" by Black and "The Rise of the Fourth Reich" by Marrs to name just a few. This means God is conscious energy/light, making us all conscious energy/light. This is how we are one. We all use God's mind to think with because we are all 100% God, collectively, though God is much more expansive.
Francesco,Heres my answer for you,KEEP THY EVIL WICKED RELIGIONS OF LIES,DECEIT,CORRUPT ETC.TO THYSELF,AND SATAN LAUGHED AT YOU ALL THE WAY TO THYSELF,BEAUSE YOU ARE BELIEVING IN A LIES,KEEP THY EVIL MONSTER FALSE GODS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST EUROPIANS COUNTRY TO THYSELF,AND KEEP THY EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLES TO THYSELF,AND READ THE WHOLE DAMN THING FROM PAGE 1,ALL THE WAY TO THE END,IN KJV BIBLES,NO OTHER BIBLES ACCEPTED ,MY DAD ACCEPTED YOUR IMMORAL EVIL HOLY BIBLES INORDER TO BURN PERIODS,AND DO NOT CHERRY PICKING WHAT YOU WANT TO READ,INSTEAD READ THE WHOLE DAMN THING EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLES OF YOURS OK,AND HONESTLY SPEAKING,YOU BEEN DECEIVED,AND TRICKS,AND FOOLED BY YOUR FALSE GODS MORE THAN 50 YRS.AGO NOW, THATS TRUELY SAD ARE THEY NOT? HONESTLY SPEAKING,YOU AND I,HAVE A DIFFERENT GOD,NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO,WHEN YOU TRYING TO DRAG MY DAD FAMILY INTO YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS ETC.ALWAYS ENDING IN THE GARBAGES CAN,AND REJECTION AND DECLINES NO MATTER WHAT FROM MY DAD FAMILY.GET LOST ASSHOLES,YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS AND YOUR IMMORAL EVIL CRIMINAL HOLY BIBLES,AND FALSE GODS,EVIL RELIGIOUS LEADERS,AND EVIL RELIGIOUS PEOPLES NO PLACE INTO MY DAD FAMILY NO MATTER WHAT,THESE EVIL PEOPLES DOESN'T BELONGS INTO MY DAD FAMILY IN THE FIRST PLACE,AND DON'T EVEN WASTE YOUR TIMES,BECAUSE WE DON'T WORKS THESAME THING AS YOU DO.AND ALSO,WE DON'T NEED FALSE GODS. FROM THE MIDDLE EAST EUROPIANS COUNTRY,THE ORIGINAL CREATOR GOD MY DAD HAD NOTHING TO DO TO ALL OF THEM,AND NO PART OF YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS AND NO PART OF YOUR EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLE OF YOURS HERE ON EARTH.ETC.AND YOU CANNO'T CONQUER THE WORLD ,BECAUSE ITS FORBIDDEN BY THE ORIGINAL CREATOR GOD MY DAD,AND YOU NEED TO CONQUER YOURSELF IN THE AFTER LIFES,THE AFTER LIFES IS WHAT YOU NEED TO CONQUER AS WHAT MY DAD SAID.ETC.THATS ALL AND THANKS.
Francesco,The Original Creator God my Dad said very clearly,your lifes in the afterlifes you need to conquer,and to conquer the after lifes,Honestly Speaking,you canno't conquer my Dad family,its because its forbidden by The Original Creator God my Dad,and my Dad never gives power to the human beings here on earth including all the mortal false gods,especially doesn't belongs into my Dad family.The Original Creator God my Dad who makes that decisions who belongs to my Dad family or not belongs into my Dad family,it is him,who made that decisions not the mortal human beings here on earth and the mortal false gods either,all of these peoples have No right when it comes into my Dad family no matter what,aside from this,my Dad family out of all the wicked religions here on earth,No affiliation of the wicked religions here on earth.YOU AND I,HAVE A DIFFERENT GOD,MY GOD IS NOT YOUR GOD,YOUR GOD IS NOT MY GOD IS THAT MAKE SENSE NOW TO YOU?.ETC.THATS ALL AND THANKS.
Yes, God is not a magician. Magic has to do with deception, secrecy and mysticism. God is true, open and powerful. God creates and does things by means of his energy and force according to the laws established. He does perform miracles though. Miracles are basically God using his invisible energy and force to manipulate finite energy and matter according to established laws, beyond what is understood by an observer or by man who may examine a divine event.
You talk it with Barbara Brennan, the physicist that wrote "Hands of Light". See what you look like as a holographic, multidimensional, electromagnetic eternal energy/light being with pictures.
In response to Krauss' comment that when Einstein said God, he didn't really mean God, I'd like to share these quotes from Einstein so that he can speak for himself. (I'm an agnostic atheist, by the way.) "My comprehension of God comes from the deeply felt conviction of a superior intelligence that reveals itself in the knowable world." --Albert Einstein "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views." --Albert Einstein "Your question [about God] is the most difficult in the world. It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable? The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things." --Albert Einstein, In answer to the question, “Do you believe in God?” From an interview with G. S. Viereck, “What Life Means to Einstein,” Saturday Evening Post, October 26, 1929
Vidar I've seen the letter, and the God he is discussing is a personal God,the God of the Bible that answers prayers and talks to people. He always denounced that God, not just in his later years.
***** I know Einstein wasn't referring to the Abrahamic God, he always made it very clear that he didn't believe in that God, but he did believe in the God of Spinoza. Just because you don't believe in the Abrahamic God doesn't make you an atheist, there are other ideas of God.
***** He didn't say that, he said that his use of the word God was a misnomer, and that what he was really referring to were the laws of nature, and that's not true. Einstein saw the laws of nature as an expression of intelligence, and that intelligence was his God.
UpFromTheSkiess Well that's not true though, he did describe his use of the word "god" to mean the precision of the universe, not the intelligence, he might have said it was intelligible, beautiful in it's simplicity, elegant & so on but I don't think he ever referred to there being an actual intelligence behind it. He was appreciating the beauty of the universe as he saw it & didn't realize that he was twisting the very concept of "god" to mean something entirely different to the origin of the word :P
Little Bird - I’m the opposite of a Rogan fan but can listen to his interviews. After DMT LK prolly won’t look like Rogan or speak in gee wow, “that blows my mind!¡!¡” exclamation points. Like Rogan. Unlike Tim “No Tattoo” Ferriss.
As a Christian I really enjoy seeing and learning more about God’s creation. I understand that my view is not popular with Krauss. No matter. I am glad men like him do reach.
In an alternate universe, there is a Lawrance Krauss; that doesn't harass women at both ASU and Case Western U, doesn't defend Jeffrey Epstein or is the beneficiary of anything from him, has religious tolerance and doesn't troll people from multiple religious faiths, but sadly in this universe we have this version of Krauss.
Krauss is a serious scientist ! He taught me Balls Law! .....The throb of the knob is equal to heat of the beat provided the angle of dangle is constant... isn`t science great?!
"Parallel" as a description word, applies strictly to physical geometrical concepts of Asymptotic Alignments. So in the context of Actuality in Principle, time duration timing modulation interference positioning resonance imaging of those physical-geometrical alignments is insideout reciprocal positioning of co-existing pure relative motion, mathematical amplitude and frequency interference positioning resonance-modulation formulae. Which makes the Universe of coexisting parallel-ism symbolized by "logarithmicly condensed", (the self-defining meaning of +/-Inflation probability localization), geometrical representation in Geometrical Drawing and Perspective frames of orthogonality, or Temporal Superposition-point Singularity, Holographic Image projection positioning Calculus of e-Pi-i = .dt/here-now-forever. A real e-Pi-i understanding of the "Quantum Operator", prevents the type of "Cloning" suggested by the misleading terminology used for "Parallel Universes".
All you hear anymore is " your nothing an accident " it seems to be a real agenda these days but then all these people aspect the real objective respect in their lives which is contradictory it seems.
The capsule of Chang'e5 were flown to Beijing after landing on Thursday. The mission achieved firsts for China's lunar exploration programme in collecting samples,launching a vehicle from the moon's surface and docking it with the capsule to transfer samples for their voyage to Earth.
What amazes me is the level of intelligence in the comments ofvthe video, talk about speaking before you think. Jeez, not one intelligent comment---including yours
The inability to test a multiverse for humans may be the case. As humans, we can understand the information given by entities in our universe through channeling. The multiverse is spot on and is part of the reason it is a theory at all. The source of such information is valid.
I have to say, I like Krauss much better when he is just doing his job as a professor at Arizona State University or the stuff he does with the Origins Project than when he is being an Atheist activist. When he is an activist for Atheism he just acts like a pompous jerk, but here is much calmer and more civil
These events are meant to attract young people to science. I'm one those who decided to pursue a career in science (physics, namely), largely because I got excited by popularizators, some of them participate in this debate. But I would like to stress a point missed in popularization: you shouldn't do science merely because you love it. You have to be VERY good at it, talented if you like. Otherwise, competition (which is huge) will smash you.
+IamaFreeWillOffering They don't talk about absolute certainties and dogmas that are not to be questioned, but about hypothesis, that are physically and mathematically plausible. That's how scientifical progress is made. That's how pretty much every single theory originated.
Fascinating insights into specifics of the direction that modern science is taking, how it got here and where it is likely to take us. Incidentally, why are so many fervently religious commentators coming on here just to insult people? Theology doesn't even feature in this discussion; just science (that would be the shit that's running your computer, Genius).
When the clouds subside and the sun peaks through the clouds, it hits the raindrops and the atmosphere, and it creates a rainbow in the distance, gravity, bending light
U knoe what sounds really good right about now? Sitting back and letting neil degrass tyson blow my mind. I heard he's well versed in doing such things.
I lean toward philosophy I am a visual Artist but I must say I enjoyed this very much - there seems to be a fusion of philosophy and matter - I will watch this again! I am particularly interested in one comment made that "we know how mass is formed" or words to that effect - (If i understood the speaker correctly) - How is it formed, anyone?
I believe "by force's acting on it" is after the fact - your reply is correct in and of it's self - what I should have said was #1, what kind of force, is acting on it and #2, why is there a force in the first place that creates matter that is like the human body for instance, - "By forces acting on it", is obvious - there would have to be a force and I suspect in the case of the human body or any life form there would be a force that caused that matter to manifest, The Life Force - What is the Life Force, I am not trying to lead you towards religion I am just trying to seek answers. But I am afraid this reply is seeking the right answer to a wrong question -
+Sonny Corbi in the standard model of particle physics, there are force particles (massless) and particles which has mass. to make the mathematics work, what theoretical physicist needed to do is change all the force particles to have mass and all the massive particles to be massless force particles. essentially all the particles you see will be massless. to explain mass then, what this really smart fellow, peter higgs, and two other guys whose name no one remembers, had to use another particle called the higgs boson. the higgs boson permeates all of space in much the same way as the old ether did. the higgs boson has a characteristic as a non-zero scalar field (you may have heard of this in inflationary cosmology). now the higgs interacts with each particle different and also itself. when the particle interacts with the higgs, the higgs creates a "resistance" or force onto the particle, giving it mass. a useful analogy which has nothing to do with philosophy is you swimming through water. as you swim you feel a resistance, or a force. from high school physics you should be aware that mass is measured by how much force is acting on you. now different particles interact with the higgs in different ways, giving rise to different masses. in such a case you would be swimming with less resistance than someone heavier wearing a big t-shirt. you should note that you cant actually see the higgs with the LHC. what you have to observe is what the higgs breaks down into, such as the W boson, or four leptons (electrons) or gamma rays, which when combined, have energy (mass). then you can describe how much the higgs actually weighs.
+Jesper Leong Thank you for taking the time to educate me in your field of understanding - Jesper as a visual Artist to me it's hand spirit coordination not hand eye - (I do not recognize organized religion and consider it more deadly then all the nuks world wide) - I produce works that depict events and other things that take place in the future - how this works or where it comes from I don't have a clue - when a transmission (for lack of a better word) - come thru i see colors flashing or actual pictures being processed mentally (again for lack of better words) - Lets assume that what I have just told you is true; can you imagine how exasperating it is to listen to findings applicable only to infrastructure - (I am speaking abstractly here) - Color is the only thing that you and I can actually see that is not molecular - that's why it is a field that can transmit within or from one dimension/frequency to another - There is one force, you can call it the life force, "god" electromagnetic - (words are not things but descriptions of things and at best subject to connotation) - Compounding "text book" data along with "tenure and good grades" is crippling - (tho very necessary) - here in is the crux of the problem at large - Energy, mass and form are one in the same thing - What came first the chicken or the egg - The chicken and the egg IS one and the same at a different stage of manifestation - again I am speaking abstractly - Science is hardwired to work only from the manifested -that's is why there is a string in String Theory - (true science uses math to carry them thru uncharted water) - remember when the news came out with, (paraphrasing) - science has found a particle that travels faster then the speed of light - The first thing loud and clear that came out of my mouth was, "no they didn't" and the next day they retracted it - Jesper Johns is the highest paid living Artist on the globe today - he's from South Carolina - This lady asked him where he was from and when he told her she said, Oh you must be from a fine southern family to which he replied, "No mam just pore white trash" :-)
+Sonny Corbi we should be very careful when interpretting physical law. over extending or generalising a law tends to distort the thing we are trying to describe to an extent that it doesnt work anymore. energy is a weird concept to get a hold off. there is an equivalence, but it is not the same as mass. in fact, energy is not the same as energy. a potential energy such as gravity or an electric magnetic field, behaviour in very different ways to kinetic energy or sound, or nuclear energy. we do know that energy came first in the early universe in a process called the big bang. about 14billion years ago, quantum mechanics did something strange to a little bit of potential energy and expanded the universe. that lost in potential energy got converted into a huge amount of energy in the form of radiation. mass came long after, when the universe started to cool down. (incidentally, evolutionary biology will tell you the egg has to come before the chicken. chicken evolved a long time after the egg was in use for the dinosaur. to call the chicken and egg the same is quite plausible in one context. but there is an answer to the problem). so i do protest when you say energy mass and form (im not sure what you mean by that) are the same... for one thing, different atoms do different things chemically. and the composition of mass in a human body is much the same as those of the rocks underneath you right now. it is the organisation of those atoms that makes the differentiation. colour is a small band in the electromagnetic spectrum given by a class of photons with energy levels we call visible light. it is certainly not a field of any sought. we now know enough about the photon, it travels in straight lines, it has a fixed speed in the vacuum of space, it is massless, it has wave and particle properties. im not a string theorist, so i dont really know. i know enough to dislike it for now. string theory was born out of something called super symmetry. there is a problem with modern physics, that the two grand theories that govern the very big and very small are incompatible. string theory hopes that adding extra dimensions will help the problem and explain how the four fundamental forces are really one of the same thing. it does have the potential to do this... unfortunately all the mathematics needed so far have not yielded any predictions and are extremely complicated to solve. another thing is how they bend and curl up the hidden dimensions. i feel you are trying to enlighten me or something....
Hey you physicists !!!! Read the book 'Hands of Light" written by the physicist Barbara Brennan. She proved a huge number of parallel realities all existing/vibrating within the space we are in right now. AND her book was published in 1987. AND she has built a college system teaching it.
After watching so many of these I get chills whenever current leaders of science bring up giants like Einstein, Niels Bohr, Michael Faraday, Maxwell, ect. And you can feel the sadness when they say there names almost like "I wish you were still alive to help us with our 21th century questions."
Could you imagine a reaction video of Einstein when MIT first came out with their trillion FPS videos. Einstein would shit himself out of shear excitement,
I get chills listening to Gross and Wilczek laughing on that open mic while he's lamenting on the state of physics.
The academic community did not grudgingly offer Einstein a job until he had demonstrated his superiority and, more importantly, the public found out about it. Today, they would simply censor his work, ensuring he could not satisfy the second condition.
I honestly learn more from these talks and debates than I did in my high school classes. Wonderfully taught, and these physicists make you WANT to learn. Brilliantly made, this Origins project
Big Al Brennan being able to regurgitate these words isn’t truly the same thing as having learned the concepts ... but I sort of feel you?
Agreed, I hated school and almost refused to learn as a misguided form of protest, nowadays at 65yrs of age I consider myself a self-taught polymath and talks and lectures on the net have played a massive part feeding my thirst for knowledge. Curiosity is the secret and no schoolteacher I had stimulated my curiosity!
Atheists are left with invoking infinite unseen untestable universes ..pretty hilarious!
@@5tonyvvvv whereas deists postulate an infinite unseen untestable bearded guy in an unseen heaven above the earth laughable isn't it?
@Anthony Maurice atheists require evidence which supports beliefs. not faith which requires no evidence. of coarse atheists have beliefs, just not in any evidence-free concepts
The opening was quite interesting but, if someone doesn't have the patience for it:
1:49
Thanking you from 4 years in the future
@@charonder I am here one month in your future - if you can hear me 'you have to wear masks in the shops now' and please tell your 4 years ago friend that he has only 3.5 years of freedom left!
noble soul..Thank you..🙂
Thank you so much for sharing this panel discussion! A joy to review. A huge congratulations to the Origins Project on their 5th anniversary!
How do people get this smart? I envy their passion for their work.
Genuine interest and consistency in dedication to their work.
Discovery is for anyone that likes it. But yeah my strength isn't math its english....
Put god first 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣
And here I am smoking a bong eating cheetos
You call that smart?
I'm loving these debates. Kudos to Lawrence Krauss.
Why would an all powerful god from any religion reveal himself in only one part of the world to a single race and to the poorest of people, for this simple pattern shows to me that those with nothing to loose had everything to gain from the spread of religion.
Never thought of it that way, that's a great point
He waited hundreds of thousands of years when humanity suffered just to appear in an age when people didn't have cameras, to an illiterate barbaric morally backward society, the least he could do was to appear in our age. I wonder why religious people doesn't think about that, the very idea of gods is ridiculous
***** sounds like something I've heard Hitch say :)
You hit the nail!
Those who got nothing to loose, literally broke, needs to rely in faith upon themselves that they either believe in they can make next moment bit better or they can stop complaining about how worst they are...
And god was invented to provide just that faith. Nothing else, but the faith that is required when you are fighting a loosing battle. You know the probability of winning the lotto, still ask god to score a win.. that god there is hope.. which is just a twisted way of meaning faith...a blind hope is the faith and only god can provide us a hope, even while sinking inside an inescapable black hole..
_Define faith -
faith
feɪθ/Submit
noun
1.
complete trust or confidence in someone or something._
Thus, faith doesn't need to be true, you just need to believe that it's the truth.
And irony is, no matter how repelled you feel from the word god, you still have to believe in something, may be yourself...which gives you exactly same amount of pleasure/benefit as having faith in god ( of course you have to be bit optimistic )
Thus, I ask is you a god?
just to be clear, do any of you people realize that loose is different from lose?
I really admire the passion n enthusiasm of Lawrence Krauss..n his work on the Origins Project..hopefully this project will continue..now almost everyone has access to this kind of scientific programmes..
Why are so many religious people in these comments getting so Mad at these people, and not only mad but many of you call these people idiots..
What kind of attitude is that for a moral religious person. If you want people to listen to your religious beliefs, then why can't you listen to these beliefs.
The majority of atheists and scientists don't want disprove your God, but it so happens that the evidence they gather doesn't support it. We know the earth is older than 6000 years old.
You are right...........
Great comment. It confuses me no end that as an Atheist, I have been subjected to cold glares, irritation, and outright hostility from relatives who ( I thought) knew and loved me for 30+ years. Fuck 'em. And they are devout Christians who shunned and lied about me, un-friended me on FB, the whole gamut. How do I go from loved to hated, after I came out as a non-believer?
It makes no fucking sense.
Petro March "moral religious person?" Fucking oxymoron.
These are not beliefs...
Great and engaging introduction. These talks are so fascinating.
The guy laughing so smugly in the background is really annoying
I think that it is Wendy Freedman
@@andyykmeryiddothomsen7411 you killed me on that one
Delicious brain food.
Very interesting. This is so wonderful.
Science is a way of knowing and scientists are adventurers on the quest to knowing. I like how the speakers imply that any idea however wild it may be has a potential of becoming a reality as long as you never give up on testing it, however long it may take, until you have the answers and it is proven to be part of reality or otherwise. This is how scientists should be portrayed in mainstream media - not some mad hermit who always opposes natural remedies, religion, child musings, and anything that he does not believe without even putting an effort in investigating it.
exactly
This needs more views!!!!
55:32 That pen flip, had me re-winding over and over.
No one has ever discovered anything more complex or awe inspiring than where we understand the universe. The brain which we know least about of all.
Listening second time again....just awesomeness.....!!!great minds in a single place....why Brian Greene was missing here ?
ty for posting this without commercials..
I love how when Krauss starts dissing the Standard Model, David Gross goes, "No, no, no," as if to overrule him like some church elder.
it is just a theory though. krauss acts like a hyper child
Yeah exactly like those Hindu fanatics ringing temple bells with swords
Please, don't say, "just a theory" in this space. It's not useful.
high priests of science 🙂
The Kinks - Supersonic Rocket Ship playing there at the beginning for like 3 seconds, great song, great album, great band
The Endgame song. I had it and I love it.
In my next life, I want to be a scientist. Loved this presentation: humorous, enlightening and time well spent watching.
I really wished I'd talked my thumb from my ass and knuckled down and worked at being a scientists. Great respect for these lords and ladies of wisdom!
Why not be a scientist in this life?
@@greggutierrez6339 that's interesting. I'll work on that!
@@pattyray8784 you could start by watching "Smarter everyday" videos on you tube.
@@greggutierrez6339 Will do! Thanks.
There are no accidents. There is cause and effect. One or some thing causes the effect of another thing or things.
There are many more dimensions, not universes. The energy of space is so small because it is based on smaller, lower dimensions (extra dimensions, sub-quantum dimensions).
Excellent explanation Frank!
Quantum mechanics begs to differ with you 🤷
Demonstrably prove your claims.
It is extremely optimistic to think you can discover how everything is made when you only have 4% of the information.
what a terrific panel and set of pitches - bravo
This is an invitation to see a theory on the nature of time! In this theory we have an emergent uncertain future continuously coming into existence relative to the spontaneous absorption and emission of photon energy. Within such a process the wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons is forming a blank canvas that we can interact with forming the possible into the actual! The future is unfolding with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment relative to the atoms of the periodic table and the individual wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. As part of a universal process of energy exchange that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life the ‘past’ has gone forever. At the smallest scale of this process the ‘past’ is represented by anti-matter annihilation with the symmetry between matter and anti-matter representing the symmetry between the future and the past as the future unfolds photon by photon. In such a theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of ‘time’ with the classical physics of Newton representing processes over a period of time, as in Newton’s differential equations. In my videos I explain how this process is relative to temperature and the phase changes of matter.
Where can I find your videos?
Word salad
Your first 4 lines translated. Just do it!
Next 2 lines: what`s done is done.
Then i got bored translating the nuances ssso sloowww, light goes and small shit is as well. Dropped things fall..hot! That`s rap and yours sucks. Geez Dick! Nobody speak nobody get choked.
but having said that nothing is more praiseworthy than the pursuit of attempting understanding the truth of this amazing world
2009 until 2014? I wish this had kept going. Why did it stop at 2014?
Because of 2015, april, 17 to 29. Bronx sighting think what was coming. out by Pluto inbound. think...think.
I thought it simply changed to ASU Origins?
Leather Rebel Justice it's Ted talks now
Maria is absolutely adorable and intelligent. Killer combination
Just realized Lawrence Krauss looks just like that one regeneration specialist from The Fifth Element, the one that says "Perfect" when Milla is being regenerated.
So just keep invoking infinite unseen untestable universes.. got it
@@5tonyvvvv lmfao nobody cares but keep it up moron.
Steven gear UFO presente r bob lazar
@@stedo1wack269 Steven Gear is a reptilian shape-shifting evil lizard
@@patriciawoods7628 surprise surprise David icke should no shit
I hope there will be new debates like this
Covid didn't help things.
Awe shucks, this would have been a great discussion for Brain Greene.
Or Deepak Chopra
@@thomasrosendahl2783 lmao
Absolutely fascinating and captivating anything for the relatively uneducated everyone should watch.
Krause's initial bit goes until 19:01
👏👏👏👏👏
👏👏👏👏👏
Thanks Skipperino Kripperino!
wow, kripps cancer spreading to even here
No need to point that cuz seriously who doesn't like listening to Krauss
He is awesome
I was waiting for this since last Saturday!!
Is God a Magician
In my life I was always fascinated with science, specifically. Physics. It is the subject of how the physical world really works, basically how energy matter and time come together using the laws of nature. Growing up and going to a Catholic school you quickly learn God created the world in seven days.
Thru the years I struggled with this fact, many refer to God as being a Magician. I was not comfortable with that notion. I always looked at Magician as being phony, they pulled rabbits out of hats. God is a Great Creator he did not need to use magic, but if He chose to HE could. Also I have always enjoyed a good magician performance.
Well with our marvelous advancement in the field communication where you can voice opinions on RUclips where many seek to use science for a proof of God. I have to be thankful to the many that helped clear my dilemma “Is God a Magician”. I learned When God wants to be a Magician, He is the ABSOLUTE BEST of all time and He did not use deception. He let all of the so called Scientist up to today to explain LIGHT and they are still in the dark.
francesco
The physicist Barbara Brennan is not in the dark. Neither is Ford. They both wrote books explaining how at the core of us and reality are light waves. So since light waves are our core, then everything is magic. What is wrong with saying everything is magic? Imagery and image and imagination are the core of magic. We are constantly created in the image of God. You wonder what God looks like.. We look like God without these bodies. Look at the book "Hands of Light" written by the physicist Barbara Brennan. In this book is what we look like out of these bodies. We look like the God particle or Higgs Boson. From each of the quarks that are spinning as 3 points of light forming what are called protons and neutrons comes us. We are 100% light. We consist of 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 spinning light atoms. We just seem to be solid because what spins so fast looks solid. But we are not solid and nothing is.
Look at the article at collective-evolution.com It is titled "Nothing is Solid and Everything is Energy"
Then look up the books "The Dumbing Down of America" and "The War Against the Weak" by Black and "The Rise of the Fourth Reich" by Marrs to name just a few.
This means God is conscious energy/light, making us all conscious energy/light. This is how we are one. We all use God's mind to think with because we are all 100% God, collectively, though God is much more expansive.
Francesco,Heres my answer for you,KEEP THY EVIL WICKED RELIGIONS OF LIES,DECEIT,CORRUPT ETC.TO THYSELF,AND SATAN LAUGHED AT YOU ALL THE WAY TO THYSELF,BEAUSE YOU ARE BELIEVING IN A LIES,KEEP THY EVIL MONSTER FALSE GODS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST EUROPIANS COUNTRY TO THYSELF,AND KEEP THY EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLES TO THYSELF,AND READ THE WHOLE DAMN THING FROM PAGE 1,ALL THE WAY TO THE END,IN KJV BIBLES,NO OTHER BIBLES ACCEPTED ,MY DAD ACCEPTED YOUR IMMORAL EVIL HOLY BIBLES INORDER TO BURN PERIODS,AND DO NOT CHERRY PICKING WHAT YOU WANT TO READ,INSTEAD READ THE WHOLE DAMN THING EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLES OF YOURS OK,AND HONESTLY SPEAKING,YOU BEEN DECEIVED,AND TRICKS,AND FOOLED BY YOUR FALSE GODS MORE THAN 50 YRS.AGO NOW, THATS TRUELY SAD ARE THEY NOT? HONESTLY SPEAKING,YOU AND I,HAVE A DIFFERENT GOD,NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO,WHEN YOU TRYING TO DRAG MY DAD FAMILY INTO YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS ETC.ALWAYS ENDING IN THE GARBAGES CAN,AND REJECTION AND DECLINES NO MATTER WHAT FROM MY DAD FAMILY.GET LOST ASSHOLES,YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS AND YOUR IMMORAL EVIL CRIMINAL HOLY BIBLES,AND FALSE GODS,EVIL RELIGIOUS LEADERS,AND EVIL RELIGIOUS PEOPLES NO PLACE INTO MY DAD FAMILY NO MATTER WHAT,THESE EVIL PEOPLES DOESN'T BELONGS INTO MY DAD FAMILY IN THE FIRST PLACE,AND DON'T EVEN WASTE YOUR TIMES,BECAUSE WE DON'T WORKS THESAME THING AS YOU DO.AND ALSO,WE DON'T NEED FALSE GODS. FROM THE MIDDLE EAST EUROPIANS COUNTRY,THE ORIGINAL CREATOR GOD MY DAD HAD NOTHING TO DO TO ALL OF THEM,AND NO PART OF YOUR WICKED RELIGIONS AND NO PART OF YOUR EVIL CRIMINAL IMMORAL HOLY BIBLE OF YOURS HERE ON EARTH.ETC.AND YOU CANNO'T CONQUER THE WORLD ,BECAUSE ITS FORBIDDEN BY THE ORIGINAL CREATOR GOD MY DAD,AND YOU NEED TO CONQUER YOURSELF IN THE AFTER LIFES,THE AFTER LIFES IS WHAT YOU NEED TO CONQUER AS WHAT MY DAD SAID.ETC.THATS ALL AND THANKS.
Francesco,The Original Creator God my Dad said very clearly,your lifes in the afterlifes you need to conquer,and to conquer the after lifes,Honestly Speaking,you canno't conquer my Dad family,its because its forbidden by The Original Creator God my Dad,and my Dad never gives power to the human beings here on earth including all the mortal false gods,especially doesn't belongs into my Dad family.The Original Creator God my Dad who makes that decisions who belongs to my Dad family or not belongs into my Dad family,it is him,who made that decisions not the mortal human beings here on earth and the mortal false gods either,all of these peoples have No right when it comes into my Dad family no matter what,aside from this,my Dad family out of all the wicked religions here on earth,No affiliation of the wicked religions here on earth.YOU AND I,HAVE A DIFFERENT GOD,MY GOD IS NOT YOUR GOD,YOUR GOD IS NOT MY GOD IS THAT MAKE SENSE NOW TO YOU?.ETC.THATS ALL AND THANKS.
Yes, God is not a magician. Magic has to do with deception, secrecy and mysticism. God is true, open and powerful. God creates and does things by means of his energy and force according to the laws established.
He does perform miracles though. Miracles are basically God using his invisible energy and force to manipulate finite energy and matter according to established laws, beyond what is understood by an observer or by man who may examine a divine event.
The ASU Origins Project delivers another enthralling video.
More NdGT please.
Accident of our exitance? That is funny...
How can you talk multiverse without Brian Greene?
You talk it with Barbara Brennan, the physicist that wrote "Hands of Light". See what you look like as a holographic, multidimensional, electromagnetic eternal energy/light being with pictures.
I feel so bad for Shirley
In response to Krauss' comment that when Einstein said God, he didn't really mean God, I'd like to share these quotes from Einstein so that he can speak for himself. (I'm an agnostic atheist, by the way.)
"My comprehension of God comes from the deeply
felt conviction of a superior intelligence that reveals
itself in the knowable world."
--Albert Einstein
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I,
with my limited human mind, am able to recognize,
there are yet people who say there is no God. But
what makes me really angry is that they quote me
for support of such views."
--Albert Einstein
"Your question [about God] is the most difficult in the world. It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable? The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things."
--Albert Einstein, In answer to the question, “Do you believe in God?” From an interview with G. S. Viereck, “What Life Means to Einstein,” Saturday Evening Post, October 26, 1929
Well he did write a letter in his later years to clear up precisely what he meant & denounces belief in a god, just google the letter :)
Vidar I've seen the letter, and the God he is discussing is a personal God,the God of the Bible that answers prayers and talks to people. He always denounced that God, not just in his later years.
***** I know Einstein wasn't referring to the Abrahamic God, he always made it very clear that he didn't believe in that God, but he did believe in the God of Spinoza. Just because you don't believe in the Abrahamic God doesn't make you an atheist, there are other ideas of God.
***** He didn't say that, he said that his use of the word God was a misnomer, and that what he was really referring to were the laws of nature, and that's not true. Einstein saw the laws of nature as an expression of intelligence, and that intelligence was his God.
UpFromTheSkiess Well that's not true though, he did describe his use of the word "god" to mean the precision of the universe, not the intelligence, he might have said it was intelligible, beautiful in it's simplicity, elegant & so on but I don't think he ever referred to there being an actual intelligence behind it. He was appreciating the beauty of the universe as he saw it & didn't realize that he was twisting the very concept of "god" to mean something entirely different to the origin of the word :P
This is magnificent! Thank you for the upload
I NEED Krauss's shirt D: :P
Too bad while Lawrence is giving his introduction several of the physicists can't shut their mouths and wait till they are addressed.
I don’t want to hear from Krauss again till he’s done some dmt.
-Joe Rogan
@@nicolausteslaus 😂 why? He seems like a nice little nerd
Little Bird - I’m the opposite of a Rogan fan but can listen to his interviews. After DMT LK prolly won’t look like Rogan or speak in gee wow, “that blows my mind!¡!¡” exclamation points. Like Rogan. Unlike Tim “No Tattoo” Ferriss.
The answer is in our HEART , If we put love peace faith kindness
I like the way she spins her pen.
Having Stephen Hawking as a guest in the audience but never mention black holes in the scheme of physics is a mind puzzling.
As a Christian I really enjoy seeing and learning more about God’s creation. I understand that my view is not popular with Krauss. No matter. I am glad men like him do reach.
There's a god?! How did you learn of it?
It completely contradicts organised religion and you’re glad?
No you don't.
It's hard to feign pragmatism to pragmatists.
God could have explained this in the Bible, instead of telling us it was all magic.
i appreciate it and thank you for put it online for free
21:40 Krause checkin' dat ass :D
Oh Yeah!!!
I must agree that Maria Spiropulu is brilliant and also very lovely.
In an alternate universe, there is a Lawrance Krauss;
that doesn't harass women at both ASU and Case Western U,
doesn't defend Jeffrey Epstein or is the beneficiary of anything from him,
has religious tolerance and doesn't troll people from multiple religious faiths,
but sadly in this universe we have this version of Krauss.
"And the geek shall inherit the earth" -Neil Degrasse Tyson
🤣💀
Krauss is a serious scientist ! He taught me Balls Law! .....The throb of the knob is equal to heat of the beat provided the angle of dangle is constant... isn`t science great?!
"Parallel" as a description word, applies strictly to physical geometrical concepts of Asymptotic Alignments. So in the context of Actuality in Principle, time duration timing modulation interference positioning resonance imaging of those physical-geometrical alignments is insideout reciprocal positioning of co-existing pure relative motion, mathematical amplitude and frequency interference positioning resonance-modulation formulae.
Which makes the Universe of coexisting parallel-ism symbolized by "logarithmicly condensed", (the self-defining meaning of +/-Inflation probability localization), geometrical representation in Geometrical Drawing and Perspective frames of orthogonality, or Temporal Superposition-point Singularity, Holographic Image projection positioning Calculus of e-Pi-i = .dt/here-now-forever.
A real e-Pi-i understanding of the "Quantum Operator", prevents the type of "Cloning" suggested by the misleading terminology used for "Parallel Universes".
Aaaaaaaah. "to quote homer..." :D :D :D
Celtic thunder
You look under a microscope to watch, mold, grow is even more fascinating
im so glad I quit theoretical physics to pick up women...
Thank you shirley films!
All you hear anymore is " your nothing an accident " it seems to be a real agenda these days but then all these people aspect the real objective respect in their lives which is contradictory it seems.
More people need to see this.
lmfao I'd be a atheist too if God gave me that face daaaaaaaaam professor Krauss
Wait until your child receives severe acne, or trauma due to a car wreck, or you or your spouse. Grow up Matthew Davis.
Not cool, Matthew. And you know that.
He is a beautiful man. You are the ugly one Mat
remeber god making us in his image?? so your saying your god is ugly?? well done
at leas krauss has a healty brain unlike your god
The capsule of Chang'e5 were flown to Beijing after landing on Thursday.
The mission achieved firsts for China's lunar exploration programme
in collecting samples,launching a vehicle from the moon's surface and docking it with the capsule to transfer samples for their voyage to Earth.
What amazes me is the level of intelligence in the comments ofvthe video, talk about speaking before you think. Jeez, not one intelligent comment
+Hardcourt Fenton Mudd if we ever find intelligent life in the universe, it won't be on earth.
+ENiGMA If we find intelligent life in the universe, it won't be on youtube.
Mose Allison summed this phonomenom up in his song, "Your mind is on vacation and your mouth is working overtime."
ENiGMA I i
What amazes me is the level of intelligence in the comments ofvthe video, talk about speaking before you think. Jeez, not one intelligent comment---including yours
IT'S THE KINKS!
Ahhhh "Supersonic Rocket Ship", now I get it
Bentinho Massaro gives a more specific talk on parallel realities
The inability to test a multiverse for humans may be the case.
As humans, we can understand the information given by entities in our universe through channeling.
The multiverse is spot on and is part of the reason it is a theory at all.
The source of such information is valid.
Aperture science......" We do what we must, because we can"
I have to say, I like Krauss much better when he is just doing his job as a professor at Arizona State University or the stuff he does with the Origins Project than when he is being an Atheist activist. When he is an activist for Atheism he just acts like a pompous jerk, but here is much calmer and more civil
Why does this guy look like the bank manager in dark night lol
The tale of alternative realities is that it has been a “Post-derdag Universe!” SINCE 2007!!!!
1:19:30 almost called the audience 'uninformed' but caught himself just in time
These events are meant to attract young people to science. I'm one those who decided to pursue a career in science (physics, namely), largely because I got excited by popularizators, some of them participate in this debate. But I would like to stress a point missed in popularization: you shouldn't do science merely because you love it. You have to be VERY good at it, talented if you like. Otherwise, competition (which is huge) will smash you.
Awesome stuff
It is really amazing and want to know more..........Rafat Yusufi
~
Is quite simple to understand .. we are inside and all the universe is a organism .. and what happens with expansion is the organism grows
we are like microbes for the so called universe
Razvan Giurgiuca WRONG
No function of food.
amazing, .. thank you..
+IamaFreeWillOffering They don't talk about absolute certainties and dogmas that are not to be questioned, but about hypothesis, that are physically and mathematically plausible. That's how scientifical progress is made. That's how pretty much every single theory originated.
It is beyond what we can even fathom.
i truly love wendy
We are just beginning to enter the real physics not ending it,
Lets not forget, as the universe gets larger, it gets emptier.
Frank reminds me [his voice] of the mad scientist from the movie UHF
Lets see those pictures again! lol
Here's how you can make a difference.
Reduce Your Use of Single-Use Plastics. ...
Fascinating insights into specifics of the direction that modern science is taking, how it got here and where it is likely to take us.
Incidentally, why are so many fervently religious commentators coming on here just to insult people? Theology doesn't even feature in this discussion; just science (that would be the shit that's running your computer, Genius).
The implications of these ideas scare or offend some people, make them feel the need to defend their world view or religious beliefs.
Not many people around to face up to Sashi Taroor. Kudos, Hitch.
Thank you for enlightenment ..
i want to impress on you the GRAVITY of the situation..
Thank you Shirley.
When the clouds subside and the sun peaks through the clouds, it hits the raindrops and the atmosphere, and it creates a rainbow in the distance, gravity, bending light
U knoe what sounds really good right about now? Sitting back and letting neil degrass tyson blow my mind. I heard he's well versed in doing such things.
Do any of the speakers know that their mics are on while Laurence is giving his introduction?
I lean toward philosophy I am a visual Artist but I must say I enjoyed this very much - there seems to be a fusion of philosophy and matter - I will watch this again! I am particularly interested in one comment made that "we know how mass is formed" or words to that effect - (If i understood the speaker correctly) - How is it formed, anyone?
+Sonny Corbi By force(s) acting on it.
I believe "by force's acting on it" is after the fact - your reply is correct in and of it's self - what I should have said was #1, what kind of force, is acting on it and #2, why is there a force in the first place that creates matter that is like the human body for instance, - "By forces acting on it", is obvious - there would have to be a force and I suspect in the case of the human body or any life form there would be a force that caused that matter to manifest, The Life Force - What is the Life Force, I am not trying to lead you towards religion I am just trying to seek answers. But I am afraid this reply is seeking the right answer to a wrong question -
+Sonny Corbi in the standard model of particle physics, there are force particles (massless) and particles which has mass. to make the mathematics work, what theoretical physicist needed to do is change all the force particles to have mass and all the massive particles to be massless force particles. essentially all the particles you see will be massless.
to explain mass then, what this really smart fellow, peter higgs, and two other guys whose name no one remembers, had to use another particle called the higgs boson. the higgs boson permeates all of space in much the same way as the old ether did. the higgs boson has a characteristic as a non-zero scalar field (you may have heard of this in inflationary cosmology).
now the higgs interacts with each particle different and also itself. when the particle interacts with the higgs, the higgs creates a "resistance" or force onto the particle, giving it mass. a useful analogy which has nothing to do with philosophy is you swimming through water. as you swim you feel a resistance, or a force. from high school physics you should be aware that mass is measured by how much force is acting on you. now different particles interact with the higgs in different ways, giving rise to different masses. in such a case you would be swimming with less resistance than someone heavier wearing a big t-shirt.
you should note that you cant actually see the higgs with the LHC. what you have to observe is what the higgs breaks down into, such as the W boson, or four leptons (electrons) or gamma rays, which when combined, have energy (mass). then you can describe how much the higgs actually weighs.
+Jesper Leong Thank you for taking the time to educate me in your field of understanding -
Jesper as a visual Artist to me it's hand spirit coordination not hand eye - (I do not recognize organized religion and consider it more deadly then all the nuks world wide) - I produce works that depict events and other things that take place in the future - how this works or where it comes from I don't have a clue - when a transmission (for lack of a better word) - come thru i see colors flashing or actual pictures being processed mentally (again for lack of better words) - Lets assume that what I have just told you is true; can you imagine how exasperating it is to listen to findings applicable only to infrastructure - (I am speaking abstractly here) -
Color is the only thing that you and I can actually see that is not molecular - that's why it is a field that can transmit within or from one dimension/frequency to another -
There is one force, you can call it the life force, "god" electromagnetic - (words are not things but descriptions of things and at best subject to connotation) - Compounding "text book" data along with "tenure and good grades" is crippling - (tho very necessary) - here in is the crux of the problem at large -
Energy, mass and form are one in the same thing - What came first the chicken or the egg - The chicken and the egg IS one and the same at a different stage of manifestation - again I am speaking abstractly -
Science is hardwired to work only from the manifested -that's is why there is a string in String Theory - (true science uses math to carry them thru uncharted water) -
remember when the news came out with, (paraphrasing) - science has found a particle that travels faster then the speed of light - The first thing loud and clear that came out of my mouth was, "no they didn't" and the next day they retracted it -
Jesper Johns is the highest paid living Artist on the globe today - he's from South Carolina - This lady asked him where he was from and when he told her she said, Oh you must be from a fine southern family to which he replied, "No mam just pore white trash" :-)
+Sonny Corbi
we should be very careful when interpretting physical law. over extending or generalising a law tends to distort the thing we are trying to describe to an extent that it doesnt work anymore.
energy is a weird concept to get a hold off. there is an equivalence, but it is not the same as mass. in fact, energy is not the same as energy. a potential energy such as gravity or an electric magnetic field, behaviour in very different ways to kinetic energy or sound, or nuclear energy.
we do know that energy came first in the early universe in a process called the big bang. about 14billion years ago, quantum mechanics did something strange to a little bit of potential energy and expanded the universe. that lost in potential energy got converted into a huge amount of energy in the form of radiation. mass came long after, when the universe started to cool down. (incidentally, evolutionary biology will tell you the egg has to come before the chicken. chicken evolved a long time after the egg was in use for the dinosaur. to call the chicken and egg the same is quite plausible in one context. but there is an answer to the problem).
so i do protest when you say energy mass and form (im not sure what you mean by that) are the same... for one thing, different atoms do different things chemically. and the composition of mass in a human body is much the same as those of the rocks underneath you right now. it is the organisation of those atoms that makes the differentiation.
colour is a small band in the electromagnetic spectrum given by a class of photons with energy levels we call visible light. it is certainly not a field of any sought. we now know enough about the photon, it travels in straight lines, it has a fixed speed in the vacuum of space, it is massless, it has wave and particle properties.
im not a string theorist, so i dont really know. i know enough to dislike it for now. string theory was born out of something called super symmetry. there is a problem with modern physics, that the two grand theories that govern the very big and very small are incompatible. string theory hopes that adding extra dimensions will help the problem and explain how the four fundamental forces are really one of the same thing. it does have the potential to do this... unfortunately all the mathematics needed so far have not yielded any predictions and are extremely complicated to solve. another thing is how they bend and curl up the hidden dimensions.
i feel you are trying to enlighten me or something....
All parts are good.
The origins project is awesome
Well, how do you explain the leap year?
32:12 is that an artists rendition? Where is that located?
Hey you physicists !!!! Read the book 'Hands of Light" written by the physicist Barbara Brennan. She proved a huge number of parallel realities all existing/vibrating within the space we are in right now. AND her book was published in 1987. AND she has built a college system teaching it.
How did she prove existence of Parellel universes just by writing her book????😂