At the time of writing this video had 4.7k views compared to millions of views for meaningless videos. A statistic that reveals the ratio of smart and intelligent people to simple minded folks.
This film should be shown in all schools, at the beginning and end of their school year. It is an amazing conversation that touches on the right way to approach life itself. A smart film for smart people.
it happens by pure chanse, there might be trillions of other universa where the laws are not the same, could be even so horrible that it would never even become universe like ours. something is not illogical because you do not understand
@@ezekiel1999 Yes, the multiverse is a convenient way to assume that law happens by accident and enough random tries without a prototype will eventually hit the bulls eye, like playing darts. As Einstein said ‘God does not play dice with the universe.’ Einstein was smart in this as he was in all else. Of course for him and for Spinoza the universe was God and all there is. Neither believed in a transcendent God and for this Spinoza was expelled from his synagogue. The case for a transcendent God is if the universe(s) is or are transient, as is likely, their end is not the end, there will always be more if the Creator is the universe(s) but not confined to it (them) but can bring it or multiples back through consciousness thought and mind; consciousness fundamental, mind emerging with quantum events. How this plays out at the physical level, is understandably a slow process through evolution, not a creation of something new, but an unsheathing at the elemental level of what is already there, as consciousness, mind, energy (electricity, electromagnetism, and magnetism). All of which are little understood today by science and magnetism not at all understood, it is a total mystery.
What are you trying to say with that comment AL? Laws don't come into existence. Things interact with each other in specific ways which leads to cascading effects that are consistently the same because that's how they interact with each other. Then we come along and trying to make sense of it we look at how it works and when we get it we write it down and make it comprehensible under those "laws". There is nothing magical about that, it's us. We wrote those so you could understand them.
Question - When communicating with someone entrenched in Islam (and I don’t see anybody in the religion not deeply entrenched) how do you counter their rebuttal of the Quran not being able to be translated? There always seems to be a missing comma that total changes the interpretation of a verse that upon face value is horrific. Another is to read the Hadiths etc. The delusion seems to always defy logic.
If energy cannot be created or destroyed and if we accept that energy exists then it must be eternal? So what does he mean by the total energy is zero and that energy comes from nothing, I was taught that you cannot create or destroy it, so I'm confused.
If you say nothing holds something in to it . then you can not call that Nothing , because that is still something . Nothing is literally Nothing . so how come universe came in to existence from literally Nothing . from absoultly Nothing .
Evolved law is reasonable; created law amazing, so amazing that it happened without a mind is an assault on human intelligence. Okay if they are atheists, they are entitled, so are believers, why does belief bother them so much? Why does it get under their skin? Everyone does not have to think alike or feel alike. Get over it.
Krauss proposed that the way matter and antimatter are supposed to cancel each-other, the process can go in reverse and from "nothing" you could get the same amount of matter and antimatter. The total energy of the universe would then actually be 0.
@@tb1146 What Lawrence Krauss describes as “nothing” is not *true* nothing i.e the absence of anything at all. He defines nothing as something physical and “unstable”. Quantum fields of energy. Quantum fields are not true nothing. Essentially it’s a redefinition of nothing to argue that something can come from nothing. The title of his book is misleading. It should be called a universe from quantum fields.
How fitting,,,, black background,,, red chairs , the devils favourite colours, and a heart beat from hell, 🔥⚰️🔥yes the devil has his preachers too 👺🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️,hell is a horribly long time to be wrong,,,,isn’t it, especially for families and friends,,,,loved ones whom you con,into going, you’ll always live wi😢it forever , the Bible says ⚡️📖⚡️ those who lead into captivity shall go into captivity (hell)!
@@ezekiel1999 it's a misconception that any argument would convince either one of them. They believe nothing created them...which is magical in and of itself...so they believe their own horse shit.
![SOMETHING FROM NOTHING ? [OFFICIAL] Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss [HD] 02-04-12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUe0_4rdj0U/mqdefault.jpg)
![SOMETHING FROM NOTHING ? [OFFICIAL] Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss [HD] 02-04-12](/img/tr.png)
At the time of writing this video had 4.7k views compared to millions of views for meaningless videos. A statistic that reveals the ratio of smart and intelligent people to simple minded folks.
This film should be shown in all schools, at the beginning and end of their school year. It is an amazing conversation that touches on the right
way to approach life itself. A smart film for smart people.
Thank you so much mate... i was looking for this one for long time..
Best science duo in recent times ❤️
The catholic with the croaky voice had no point make, she rudely interrupted and didn’t listen. The boys behind her were visibly embarrassed 😳
Thanks for posting :)
1:04:45 😢
Sad, isn’t it?
2 Heroes of rationalism to carry on where Hitchens left off. Will they be swamped by the tide of loopy religious fervour?
What I cannot understand is how law came into existence without a mind. Dumb matter evolved law? It is illogical. Magical thinking.
it happens by pure chanse, there might be trillions of other universa where the laws are not the same, could be even so horrible that it would never even become universe like ours. something is not illogical because you do not understand
@@ezekiel1999 Yes, the multiverse is a convenient way to assume that law happens by accident and enough random tries without a prototype will eventually hit the bulls eye, like playing darts.
As Einstein said ‘God does not play dice with the universe.’ Einstein was smart in this as he was in all else. Of course for him and for Spinoza the universe was God and all there is. Neither believed in a transcendent God and for this Spinoza was expelled from his synagogue.
The case for a transcendent God is if the universe(s) is or are transient, as is likely, their end is not the end, there will always be more if the Creator is the universe(s) but not confined to it (them) but can bring it or multiples back through consciousness thought and mind; consciousness fundamental, mind emerging with quantum events.
How this plays out at the physical level, is understandably a slow process through evolution, not a creation of something new, but an unsheathing at the elemental level of what is already there, as consciousness, mind, energy (electricity, electromagnetism, and magnetism). All of which are little understood today by science and magnetism not at all understood, it is a total mystery.
What are you trying to say with that comment AL? Laws don't come into existence. Things interact with each other in specific ways which leads to cascading effects that are consistently the same because that's how they interact with each other. Then we come along and trying to make sense of it we look at how it works and when we get it we write it down and make it comprehensible under those "laws". There is nothing magical about that, it's us. We wrote those so you could understand them.
@@ezekiel1999 Yeah, and a whirlwind can turn the contents of junk year into a Rolls Royce.
Correction: A whirlwind can turn the content of a junk yard into a Rolls Royce?
I was taught the plural of "hippopotamus" was hippopotami.
Question - When communicating with someone entrenched in Islam (and I don’t see anybody in the religion not deeply entrenched) how do you counter their rebuttal of the Quran not being able to be translated? There always seems to be a missing comma that total changes the interpretation of a verse that upon face value is horrific. Another is to read the Hadiths etc. The delusion seems to always defy logic.
If energy cannot be created or destroyed and if we accept that energy exists then it must be eternal? So what does he mean by the total energy is zero and that energy comes from nothing, I was taught that you cannot create or destroy it, so I'm confused.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_of_a_function
If you say nothing holds something in to it . then you can not call that Nothing , because that is still something . Nothing is literally Nothing . so how come universe came in to existence from literally Nothing . from absoultly Nothing .
Most of the time it is nothing, but then for a very short time there is something existing, so most of the time there is nothing there!
time stamp when Dawkins says nothing had to be something?
Evolved law is reasonable; created law amazing, so amazing that it happened without a mind is an assault on human intelligence. Okay if they are atheists, they are entitled, so are believers, why does belief bother them so much? Why does it get under their skin? Everyone does not have to think alike or feel alike. Get over it.
Shut up, you disguisting infidel! You cannot live here amongst us, this is our Earth. Tht's why, genius
You're Welcome.
So what's the explanation of how something comes from nothing?
Krauss proposed that the way matter and antimatter are supposed to cancel each-other, the process can go in reverse and from "nothing" you could get the same amount of matter and antimatter. The total energy of the universe would then actually be 0.
@@tb1146 yeah I’m not convinced
@@alextomlinson nobody cares if you are
@@tb1146 What Lawrence Krauss describes as “nothing” is not *true* nothing i.e the absence of anything at all.
He defines nothing as something physical and “unstable”. Quantum fields of energy. Quantum fields are not true nothing.
Essentially it’s a redefinition of nothing to argue that something can come from nothing. The title of his book is misleading. It should be called a universe from quantum fields.
quantum tunneling between 11 dimensions (current theory) you are asking a difficult question and pretty much a currently unanswerable question :-)
How fitting,,,, black background,,, red chairs , the devils favourite colours, and a heart beat from hell, 🔥⚰️🔥yes the devil has his preachers too 👺🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️,hell is a horribly long time to be wrong,,,,isn’t it, especially for families and friends,,,,loved ones whom you con,into going, you’ll always live wi😢it forever , the Bible says ⚡️📖⚡️ those who lead into captivity shall go into captivity (hell)!
Actually we are descended from Neanderthals, anyway...
türkçe altyazılı olsaydı keşke.
When atheist Kraus and Dawkins die... they're going to have an oh shit moment.
Luckely for them, a moron on the intenet convinced them with great arguments. thanks for your contribution, Joe
@@ezekiel1999 it's a misconception that any argument would convince either one of them. They believe nothing created them...which is magical in and of itself...so they believe their own horse shit.