Something From Nothing - a conversation w/ Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss - ASU Feb 4, 2012
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024
- The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (richarddawkins....)
Taped live on Feb 4, 2012 by / shirleyfilms
In conjunction with the Origins Project at ASU origins.asu.edu/
Show quoted text -
(there are still some edits and color correction to be done but we wanted to have the RUclips version out as soon as possible)
Join critically-acclaimed author and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and world-renowned theoretical physicist and author Lawrence Krauss as they discuss biology, cosmology, religion, and a host of other topics.
The authors will also discuss their new books. Dawkins recently published The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True, an exploration of the magic of discovery embodied in the practice of science. Written for all age groups, the book moves forward from historical examples of supernatural explanations of natural phenomena to focus on the actual science behind how the world works.
Krauss's latest book, A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather than Nothing, explains the scientific advances that provide insight into how the universe formed. Krauss tackles the age-old assumption that something cannot arise from nothing by arguing that not only can something arise from nothing, but something will always arise from nothing.
Founded in 2008, the ASU Origins Project is a university-wide transdisciplinary initiative aimed at facilitating cutting edge research and inquiry about origins questions, enhancing public science literacy, and improving science education. Since its inception, the Origins Project has brought the world's leading scientists, including Nobel Prize winners, to Tempe to explore origins questions. The Origins Project has hosted workshops and public events that have focused on questions as fundamental as the origin of the universe, how life began, the origins of human uniqueness, and the origins of morality.
![SOMETHING FROM NOTHING ? [OFFICIAL] Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss [HD] 02-04-12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUe0_4rdj0U/mqdefault.jpg)
![SOMETHING FROM NOTHING ? [OFFICIAL] Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss [HD] 02-04-12](/img/tr.png)
I am an engineer from Afghanistan, I really love the reasoning of Lawrence Krauss.
I hope someday we will also have the ability to express our thoughts freely.
It is inevitable that this freedom will one day exist in Afghanistan.
Until that day, keep safe, and do good work.
I can respect that
Though can't be caged by an outsider. Only the thinker can cage his thoughts. Yours seem free. Keep it free no matter what one think.
You love his reasoning for committing incest? You are not so much of a fahim Fahim.
@@Serene-Solace4455
I don't want to be mean, but in the west cousin-marriage is taboo, but in Afghanistan it isn't, right?
I love RUclips because it gives us this type of thing to learn from.
Amem
Sometimes, other times its the most dreadful drivel on earth
@@Professor_Sexyou must choose carefully your channels. Yet you almost can't avoid the drivel.. There is a medical doctor..Dr peter rogers...that has brilliant videos about the biochemistry of the body as it relates to nutrition...yet he intersperses his relating of this knowledge with his very rigid, narrow, opinionated Christian social and political viewpoints. Therefore it is a painful learning experience. Yet...he goes into such scientific detail...that it is a powerful learning experience. Hard to find the perfect channels
7 years now, but I discovered this amazing video. I am a Nigerian and I find this absolutely fascinating. The lesson of science is reaching everywhere. There is hope for mankind.
👍
The Word The whole system either comes from no-thing or you have infinite regression.Check Paul Davies Spunken theory
@The Word i think you might be a drug user with all those capitals
@The Word
Why is it that all of you stupid science deniers can't type correctly?
you give me hope for Africa, i know that most Africans are very religious i cant really blame them as most are not properly educated by no fault of their own but i really hope science becomes mainstream there.
I am delighted to see so many people listening to scientists and rationalists. This is how we evolve to a better human.
We Muslims have already been evolved to be a better human 1400 years ago
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy since then you devolved!
Listening?
It's far better for them to be thinking for themselves.
There is no emancipation happening. Infact, it's quite the opposite.
In with the new boss.
Same as the old boss.
Science is a new religion. No emancipation till it's death.
@@IbrahimAhmed-ci7zy lol
@@Inferno-hn3zx lol. Perfect
This was a fantastic conversation - eloquent, questioning, sometimes assertive but at other times recognising the limits of human knowledge. This should be shown in all schools and colleges.
Luv
Here is some science, not religion.
Cabrera Museum
Dr. Dennis Swift was shown around the museum by Dr Javier Cabrera and he was surprised at what some of the stones depicted. He saw protopeople riding pteranodons. Dr. Cabrera held up a stone of copter [pteranodons with the drawing of a man riding upon it. Some of these pteranodons were stupendously large. Quetzalcoatlus, the largest flying creature known to existed had a gigantic wingspan of fifty-one feet or more, larger than that of many jetfighter airplanes today. Another specimen had a skull and crest that measured five feet nine inches in length. The stones also indicated that the Pre Columbian Indians also had dinosaur ranches. So Marco Polo in China was right when it came to dinosaurs being trained at a young age to pull the Emperor’s chariots. It stands to reason that some of them would have been burden bearers. In history, very often the majority opinion is wrong.
As the tour of the museum was coming to a close, Dr. Cabrera opened up a photo album and he proceeded to show Dr. Dennis Swift photos of dignitaries to whom he had given stones. There was a photo of Dr. Cabrera with the Queen of Spain with an engraved stone so big it had to be hoisted with crane. He gave another to the Queen of Sweden and they stood together with a massive stone. Still a third photo was of him with Shirley MacLaine. Dr. Dennis Swift repeatedly offered Dr. Cabrera money for one of these unique priceless stones, but he insisted that he would not sell them. Dr. Cabrera also gave one to Dr. Dennis Swift’s wife affectionately known as the Queen of Beaverton, with a T.Rex and triceratops engraved on it. It stands to reason that none of these ICA Stones were cheap forgeries made by peasants. Dignitaries only want that which is genuine and they possess the means to verify their authenticity. Forget about your Radio Metric Dating for dinosaurs and rocks, they are not millions of years old. The evidence is absolutely clear they were contemporary with humans not so long ago.
The truth should be told in all schools and universities that evolution is a religion.
The Evolutionary Origin of Birds
This is a matter of deduction, it is all guess work. Pure fantasy and imagination based on the artificial geologic column. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which this remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved. Impossible alterations needed in order to change a reptile into a bird: A “variety of feathers” covering the bird, growth of wings, strengthening of certain muscles, higher blood sugar levels and body temperate levels, this is a drastic change, total revision of respiratory, nervous and reproductive systems, lightening of bones in order for it to fly, new digestive system and instinctive behaviours, every specie is subject to irreducible complexity. This is a problem for Darwinian Evolutionary Religion and a bridge too far for natural selection based on random mutations relative to the genome. It is not possible to have a build-up of genetic complexity. Irreducible complexity speaks for itself. They say it takes about 20 transitional forms [guesswork] to change one- specie into another. Charles Darwin said, “As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Good question Charlie! The number of intermediate links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great!
A note on Comparative anatomy
This not evidence for evolution. It just means that when you have a good design you use it to create a variety of species. For example: the foot, knee and ankle. Man invented the wheel, utilizing it on carts, bicycles, cars, trams, steering wheels etc.
Evolution is on trial here not Creation.
If there were a number of evolutionists in a room with one creationist, who do you think would have the legitimate right to throw a stone? If the creationist said to the evolutionists show me fossil evidence of macro-evolution on a grand- scale. All the evolutionists would have to leave the room one by one, beginning at the eldest to the youngest; he would be left alone in the room. The creationist would be the one that had the legitimate right to throw stones at all the evolutionists, but he could not do so. Being a Christian he would show love and have mercy upon the willingly ignorant, praying that they may come to their senses! Being caught up in evolution being your occupation when suddenly the light comes on is not an easy position to find yourself in. As one molecular biologist said to me anonymously, that he could see design in all living organisms but he could not say he didn’t believe in evolution or he would be out of a source of income, words to the effect.
Objectivity of Science
“One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. To be forced to believe only one conclusion that everything in the universe happened by chance [my opinion doesn’t make sense] would violate the very objectivity of science itself. They [evolutionists] challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun? It is in scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom. It would be an error to overlook that the universe was planned rather than happening by chance.”
Dr. Wernher von Braun [Father of American rocket and space program]
The problem today is communism and a lack of scientific honesty, because evolutionists are hostile towards belief in God. This teaching is all part of the globalist agenda which will end in tears.
I would have liked to see Richard Dawkins debate a man like this.
One of the videos that every human being living on 21st century should watch. Thank you, guys!
Here is science that has been observed, tested and studied. Enjoy! A spanner in the works, proving what evolutionists are really made off. Dinosaurs Contemporary with Humans
Dr Don Patton PhD in geology studied at Indiana State University, Cambridge U.K and finally finished at Queensland University Australia, after 15 years of work, he earned an accreditation which was withdrawn by Professor Wilson who was appointed Head of Department of Geology and Mineralogy at the Queensland University between 1960 to 1986; because they did not like giving degrees to Creationists. He had to work another two years before he finally got his accreditation for his PhD.
He did excavations at Glen Rose Texas at the Paluxy River Bed, which yielded dinosaur footprints and human footprints in the same rock strata being Cretaceous lime stone that is supposed to be 140 million years old! Dinosaur bones can be eroded and redeposited, they can also be intrinsically buried and here is the difference, you cannot do that with dinosaur and human tracks that have formed from sedentary mud and have turned into hard rock. The Paluxy River bed contains dinosaur footprints that you can walk in alongside human footprints, destroying the myth that dinosaurs lived millions of years before man, they were contemporary. When sediment was washed out of the human footprints, you could see clearly 5 toes and relative heel prints in pristine condition. Human footprints, seen inside dinosaur tracks; which is conclusive evidence. There were 135 dinosaur tracks but 14 human tracks in a right to left direction, going from right to left through the dinosaur tracks, some beside and within, clear evidence for those of a sound mind. Evolutionists enjoy the term erosion, but it does not fit with the actual observed evidence. These have not been carved as they were excavated from under overbearing rocks. You cannot have erosion as an answer to pristine patterns of human footprints. These are desperate remarks from evolutionists who love to grasp at straw men. They were not carved, it is not logical; how do you get underneath overbearing rocks? The layers are about 6 feet of alternating clay and lime stone, and so the reasoning by evolutionists does not make any sense. Dr Don Patton presented his findings to the Tennessee State University to a group of senior geologists; he showed the tracks and explained the process of coming to his conclusion: dinosaurs and humans were contemporary. There were about 50 Grad Students of geology present, they could not argue with his findings, so they looked back to the Head of the Department for a response. His rely was ridiculous to say the least. He said, we do not know whether back then, that there were dinosaurs with human feet. Then Dr Patton replied and we do not know whether humans had dinosaur feet and he went on to say, if they were human tracks would they look any different than todays? The Head of the Department didn’t like that answer, so he just walked away. The Curator of the Dallas Museum of Natural History came down and so the evidence and went away upset, then he came again and went away upset. He came back the third time, having been thinking about the problem and said to Dr Patton, I know what these are, even though they look like human tracks, they really are not human tracks, they were made by aliens! He was as serious as he could be. They simply do not want to accept what is clear pristine evidence. Dr Patton replied, if they are aliens and more intelligent than us; being from a distant galaxy what are they doing walking about barefoot? He didn’t like that answer so he walked away. Dr Don Patton has presented his evidence to about 100 universities in America with no positive outcome in recognition of the facts. The Darwinian box is so hardly jammed upon their heads they cannot get it off and see sense. I have no respect for evolutionists who deliberately suppress, ignore and disregard any evidence against evolution.
These types of conversations are fantastic. Dawkins really has a way with words.
Yes!! Dawkins is extremely eloquent, listening to him speak is a similar experience to viewing art in a museum.
No he doesn’t. He just has the accent
If only he had a good way with logic as well as words.
It's illogical and anti scientific to believe that this universe came into existence without cause which is what he believes.
yes he does have a way with words they are called lies
He doesn't he just doesn't default to 'god' for everything which is unknown.
I'm 64. I watch these debates to offset the loss of brain-cells that naturally happens with age.
I have "Faith" that it works!
I Love, Respect and Applaud these people.
good on you mate, why not try learn a language. even if you dont become fluent it will sure help you. you must have the time to learn heaps more about the world.
Ditto. 63 🌷
Hang in there brother. I have HOPE
And, after 2 years, did you manage to preserve enough brain cells😉
@@koenth2359
You are hilarious !
Yes, thanks for asking.
Are you Ageist?
Just a respectful question from me to your Mum's basement bedroom?
I'm a simple man. I see Richard Dawkins, I press like.
Then you are not only a simple man but a fool on the grounds that you leave your thinking to someone else - no matter whom that other person is.
Don`t reply. I have no time for people that are too bone-idle to think for themselves.
J. Z how dare you to ask me question like that,you are fool if you ask question like that. Dawkins.
how is that scientific that challenging makes you a fool.
how dare to call evolution random mutation. Dawkins
dark age of science. When MOFU who is writing more about religion then about science is self declared and masses accepted science king you know that something is wrong.
It is not any more to prove that darwin's way of evolution is right bcz it is not, but to say how other side is wrong so we are right. same asd christianity.
I'm sick of reading this bone headed comments. This is only one step away from "I'm first" fucking idiots.
Zoda Ken - You're telling the truth. The simplicity of your answer can not better confirmed your stupidity.
It is always very exciting when Prof. Richard Dawkins takes a stage. Because he is a real, stunning person, and a truth sayer.
One of the best programs by these two pillars of reason!
"Maybe I'm not fit to talk about nothing because theologians and philosophers are experts in nothing"
Krauss being savage as hell 😂
Actually it’s the atheists who claim the logical impossibility that something came from nothing
Imagine no internet for a minute. Trying to make sense of answers without men like this in our lives. We are truly lucky.
Agreed
Yes, indeed, Dom Wings!
Dawikins and Krauss two beautiful minds. Education and spreading knowledge are key. Thank you for sharing your thoughts
Dawkins' answer to the cries of the suffering masses..."Who cares"? [1h39m] The same man praises the evil warmonger John McCain as a good man, while stabbing a good man, Julian Assange, in the back. Outside of his science, Dawkins is an elitist fool.
Exactly!
@@briansmith3791 Agree with you that John McCain was an evil warmonger Republicunt & Julian Assange has done great good for the world. But WHERE THE FUCK does Dr Dawkins praise McCain & insult Assange?
yes but when you really think about we haven't really moved from square one. humans for thousands of years just assumed that we came from nothing and hence why they believed in a god.
now they are kind of passing off "from nothing" as a new idea.
Two corrupt minds simply ignoring the truth! First, there is no means of dating rocks to be millions of years old! No Radio Metric Dating methods can be trusted! Lead/ Uranium for an example: You can find rocks with radio= isotopes in them decaying, but you do not know the consistency of the rock at the very beginning: how much lead verses uranium was contained within it. Nobody knows! No scientist was present to see the decay process begin, just like no scientist was present to see chemicals come together and form living cells billions of years ago! Give me a break, give me some science, things I can observe, test and study. As for lead being found in a rock relative to uranium; there are other decaying elements that also turn into lead and leave no trace, that they were there in the beginning. All your assumptions, suppositions, presuppositions, speculative thinking all revolves around Darwinian Evolution being their axis of rotation. You know that coal seams, diamonds, gas and oil all contain carbon and are found in the geology of the earth, carbon only dates in thousands of years, not millions of years. I am afraid that evolutionists are barking up the wrong tree: Darwin's invented tree! Darwinian Evolutionary Religion is being imposed upon the masses, what a poisonous and toxic doctrine, Survival of the Fittest! Evolutionists are not true scientists, they ignore, disregard and suppress any evidence that goes against the sacred cow of evolution. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth? Kind Regards
I just watched this whole two hour conversation. It was very illuminating and thought provoking. Thank you for making it available .
Only fools who haven't fully fooled themselves yet would wade through the full 2 hours of nonsense. 10 minutes was mind-numbing enough. But then, that's what atheism is, isn't it? A barbiturate, anesthesia, opium for the dimwits-those who seek excuses from nothing and think that everything came from nothing-that was actually something? LOL Hey, the motto of the true atheist should be, "Whatever..." And behind every 'whatever' is they sigh of despair...
Jesse Bryant I agree- your mind is numbed.
Abhishek Ghoshal
After 10-minutes of that tripe it was! Would have been funny if they weren't taking themselves so seriously...
Jesse Bryant Ad hominem is no argument at all. And yes , they should take themselves very seriously indeed as they are among the most respected and accomplished people in their respective fields corroborated by their peers.
Abhishek Ghoshal
Oh, you want an argument? Then try actually listening critically to the first 10 minutes... And now, Dawkins is no such person and says all sorts of stupid things (this video providing a few examples) as many of his not-so-foolish peers tend to point out (like whatever nothing is being something simple)-besides, an appeal to prestige is no argument at all...
One of my favorite discussions of all time. Richard and Lawrence are both amazing individuals. Both are true geniuses. Love them both. I’m a huge fan of their work.
Anthony Flew is considered one of the most prominent atheists, so he retracted his atheism and ،told us that the universe has a deity with modern scientific evidence, not with thought or dreams and feeling, but after science and modern discoveries about the existence of a Creator. He fell into another problem that the Creator wanted according to his mood
He wanted the Creator to be neither speaking nor hearing, and creating creation in vain
But it is logical that this Creator sends a messenger to teach us who he is. And we have to verify the authenticity of the Messenger and what this Messenger calls to?
It transports sperm from the liquid state to the eyes, heart, blood, arteries, and bones. Unconscious nature creates a conscious human being. Then this nature teaches about the importance of the heart and lung, then puts the rib cage, then oxygen, then water, there is sexual desire, and there are the genitals to complete the male and female sexual process. , What coincidence are you talking about, a coincidence that creates the male and the female. All of these are called verses and there are things that complement each other, there is a lung and there is air and there are teeth and stomach and in food and other things and we say that it has no creator!!!
The only question God will ask you is
focus on it
((He said: Did you deny My verses and did not encompass them in knowledge, or what did you do?))
I mean, God Almighty tells you what I told you is a lie and you cannot realize it or understand it
And what in the world have you been doing?
Do you know what your answer is?
((The decree will befall them for what they did wrong, and they will not be able to speak.
If you find yourself in the world without a choice in a great reality we live in, and you go without a choice and a question is the most important
If your destiny is fire, has God wronged you???ًً
Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, is a prophet from the Creator, and before him many prophets did not lie or deceive, and he is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator who created everything.
First of all, you should know that the religion of all prophets is the worship of one Creator who created everything. Islam today is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator and not idols, illusions, conjecture or a number of gods. But how do we know that the speech is from God and not from Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace? . These are some of the things that comfort your heart and believe that this is a prophet and many of the prophets before him
The Almighty said: (Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke)
The smoke confirms that the origin of this universe is inflamed. It is not a lake of water, as was the perception of all philosophies and religions that are based on illusion. This is one of the postulates of modern science today that the sky is condensation of smoke. This fact converted the French scientist Maurice to Islam and wrote a book entitled the Holy Qur’an on the scale of modern science
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty says: ((And the heaven We constructed))
The sky is a building, not a vacuum as it was thought, and this was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 that proved it
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty’s saying: ((And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
)).
That is, the sky expands with time. This fact, even in the time of Einstein, was not imagined by anyone and it was proven. And Einstein admitted it and admitted that it was the biggest scientific mistake he made in his life if he believed that the sky was fixed. The Qur’an before Einstein says that the sky expands
fact
Almighty’s saying: :((And We have made the night and day two signs, and We erased the sign of the night and made the sign of the day visible that you may seek bounty from your Lord and may know the number of years and the account [of time]. And everything We have set out in detail.
))
The verse of the night is the moon and the verse of the day is the sun. The Qur'an tells that the sun and the moon were fiery masses. That is, the moon was a fiery mass and was erased, and the verse of the day remained visible to the eyes. Was the moon a fiery mass and extinguished? This is one of the biggest scientific issues discovered about the moon. The moon was already a fiery mass, and NASA issued on its official website a conceptual clip entitled The Evolution of the Moon in the video. In fact, the moon was a fiery mass like the sun, and this is what the Qur’an told about and the truth of modern science.
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
Almighty’s saying
And you see the mountains thinking that they are rigid, while you will cross as the passage of clouds. [It is] the work of God who has perfected everything. In fact, he knows what you're doing.))
And the verse clearly spoke of a strange phenomenon, which is that the viewer of the mountains appears to him still, that is, they are still, but in fact they are not like that, rather they are in a state of constant movement. And the infidels of Quraish had previously accused our master Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, of madness, and it is likely that their joy was overwhelming when this verse was revealed.
They also found in it, according to their claim, evidence of this madness, and they told the people: How can you believe this man who says that these fixed mountains move like clouds moving in the sky!
And today it is proven that the earth rotates, and with it the mountains, how did Muhammad know that and why is he telling you instead of the matter that makes people consider him crazy? The matter was not from him, but from God.
Almighty’s saying
Those whom Allah (in His plan) willeth to guide,- He openeth their breast to Islam; those whom He willeth to leave straying,- He maketh their breast close and constricted, as if they had to climb up to the skies: thus doth Allah (heap) the penalty on those who refuse to believe)).
After man was able to reach the sky by flying by modern means of transportation, he knew that the higher up in the air, the less oxygen and atmospheric pressure, which causes severe tightness in the chests and the process of breathing. :
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before? It was not from him, but from God
Almighty’s saying
Or (the Unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depths of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hands, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!
Modern sciences have revealed that in the bottom of the deep seas with abundant water - the deep sea - there is great darkness, to the extent that living creatures live in this darkness without visual tools, but live using their other senses such as hearing.
These dark darknesses are not found in the sea water that surrounds the Arabian Peninsula, but rather they have been discovered in the oceans far from it
This verse shows another aspect of the Qur’anic miracle, which is that the sea wave that all people only knew was one wave in the seas
The verse says there is another wave in the depths of the sea, and divers discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century a fact that was hidden in the depths of the sea, that fact that shows another wave that throws divers into it as it is thrown at swimmers, and this wave was discovered by Scandinavian divers.
I will tell you what the Prophet said. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: One day the Bedouins who live in the desert will build tall towers, and this is my duty. Go and see where the
tallest buildings are and who owns them.
God Almighty: ((We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth. But is it not sufficient concerning your Lord that He is, over all things, a Witness?)
And God informed the Qur’an of this by saying: “Did you think that we created you without a purpose and that you would never return to us?”
All these and other matters that I have not mentioned indicate that this is a prophet from God..More important than that, as I told you, is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator, who created everything and before him many prophets.
Say, if you wish, there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God
speak from the heart
According to Dawkins it is statistically impossible that 1 of the 535 members of congress either doesn’t believe in God but it’s a statistical absolute that everything came from nothing. Weird.
Join critically-acclaimed author and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and world-renowned theoretical physicist and author Lawrence Krauss as they discuss biology, cosmology, religion, and a host of other topics.
Long but fascinating discussion. Well worth listening to.
sir, how can i get the video of all great lectures of Richard Dawkins
Foundation for Reason and Science
On 11/12/13, Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
I hope r dawkins e l krauss aren't reading your comment, one is reason, science and the feeling of beauty; one is pseudoscience and woo woo
lol, the predisposition of unclear critical thinking by-product is that.
science have make more fool of it in the resent time than before
***** Oh my , and you read a Bible and it seems perfectly reasonable to you. Ha ha etc; How foolish can you get.
An intellectually stimulating discussions between two brilliant minds that have graced this World.
It was not intellectual. It was a materialistic dispute between materialists with a homogeneous audience. If they have no faith, then faith does not exist. Faith needs a place in the brain. Every unused part of the brain disappears. You do not put questions long enough, the ability to put them is gone. They are not looking for the truth. They want to feel that they are right. They do not need the truth because they feel they are right. Atheism is a dead end.
@@dariuszb7953 no its not
@@ammarsiddiqui3586 Yes, it is.
@@dariuszb7953 oh really now .hey here's a suggestion why don't you go call the atheist experience yourself
@@ammarsiddiqui3586 yeah, with Matt the dumbass running it. He is truly stupid, so no wonder your dumb ass likes him.
ruclips.net/video/dcEqnc2qdAM/видео.html
Matt says abiogenesis is not completely understood but possible.
ruclips.net/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/L0-hgSjnomA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/видео.html
Don't forget information, Matt. It's kind of important for life. And no, it can't come from chaos.
ruclips.net/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/видео.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
He says how creation is not completely understood and probably never will be although the big bang cosmology is probably the best explanation any body's ever going to come up with and oh by the way it's confirmed by observations and math but there's still little areas where we don't understand so they stick God in there because it makes them feel good. Then Don throws in, so it's like a god-of-the-gaps thing, right?
Matt does the typical atheist two-step. He can't answer the question, ignores what we KNOW, brings up the big bang that he has no idea what he's talking about, then throws in how creationists stick God in there because it makes them feel good.
He brings up the big bang. Not only is it stupid as it is, but it has nothing to do with creation.
"----Misconceptions----
The following is a partial list of misconceptions about the Big Bang model:
The Big Bang as the origin of the universe: One of the common misconceptions about the Big Bang model is the belief that it was the origin of the universe. However, the Big Bang model does not comment about how the universe came into being. Current conception of the Big Bang model assumes the existence of energy, time, and space, and does not comment about their origin or the cause of the dense and high temperature initial state of the universe.----"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
Then, if that was not stupid enough of Matt to bring it up, he also says of the big bang, ---"although the big bang cosmology is probably the best explanation anybody's ever going to come up with and oh by the way it's confirmed by observations and math but there's still little areas where we don't understand so they stick God in there because it makes them feel good."---
Again, ----"oh by the way it's confirmed by observations and math"----
NO, it's NOT!
But wait, Matt has more stupid flowing from his brain, ----"there's still little areas where we don't understand so they stick God in there because it makes them feel good."---
Let's look at those ----"still little areas"---even though this has nothing to do with answering creation.
ruclips.net/video/P-B2hACS0dQ/видео.html
creation.com/big-bang-smoking-gun
ruclips.net/video/lRP3tA_leZw/видео.html
kgov.com/evidence-against-the-big-bang
www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/bigbang.html
ruclips.net/video/HrNclw25jCc/видео.html
Dumbass Matt does not even know BASIC science that proves creation can't happen naturally. He says ----"creation is not completely understood and probably never will be"---yet we KNOW now that creation had to happen supernaturally. Now, if Matt has the science to prove that the laws were not present or needed when we got creation, he must offer proof of that. Matter of fact, Matt must offer how we got the laws of nature to begin with out of chaos.
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
Then the extreme order we have in our universe that defies all physics, but....., not to Matt. It's just happened by mere chances even though we prove it can't happen by chance.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
Matt can't get around that, period. Matt is a dumbass with dumbass followers. He's the typical dumbass atheist doing the atheist two-step to avoid facing the reality of what creation shows, a supernatural God.
"if evolution is happening now why can't we see it?" is like saying "if the hour hand is moving on my watch, why can't i see it moving?"
Pretty much.
How things can come from nothing, imagine if human being didn't create the the wheel and human stopped inventing and researching and scientists stopped researching medicine for desease how will be the life today, as we see human creating things so they are creator for those
@@MD99111 i have seen this argument so many times, it is incredibly wrong but people repeat it because they never actually rationally think about their arguments or belief. here is an entire video completely destroying it: ruclips.net/video/PHmjHMbkOUM/видео.html
😂 , evolution is everywhere , when u see viruses and bacteria get resistant to certain drugs that’s evolving , they change , mutation occurs within them to change their structure to adapt to the new environment, in smaller species like that it’s quite obvious , for humans who are more complex a full morphing into another kind of phenotypically different human would obviously take longer time hundreds to millions of years but genetically our bodies become resistant to certain diseases , if you stay in sub Saharan africa like myself a Nigerian , you have your immune system better enhanced to defend you from malaria a condition which any one from the west could easily die from if not treated well. Adaptation genetically is very evident in humans of today . In animals evolution is quite evident , the extinction of species is also proof that a group of organisms who don’t adapt can die out , invoking a perfect designer who is very much ok with his creations dying out without any external help to prevent or stall this is also not so reasonable , if I created something and I saw it disintegrating each day and I made no move to restore it , would I really be a creator ? I am not saying that there is no creator , 😂 just that there is evidence of evolution all around us you just have to look . Evidence of creator - not so obvious that doesn’t disprove it however .Just not in the sense of all powerful , all loving , all patient , doesn’t want anyone to die .....
A better analogy might be "If that mountain is eroding away, why can't I see it happening?"
But you are 100% correct !
man, i wish i had friends like dawkins and krauss. my conversations would be so much more interesting.
jimmb06 what badly dressed and wrong , I'm sure you do, I have a felling you have achieved this many times.
I’m here my love!!!
@Stacy Caruso: True. Dawkins is an elitist snob who thinks the peasants are cretins. See his comments at 1hr 39m. "who cares"? Only a cold-blooded monster thinks like that.
@Stacy Caruso all major countries have the birth rate dropping. Why is birth control and population control even being discussed? We are below replacment levels. The population is dropping.
LEAVE AFRIKA ALONE...YER STINKIN; NAZI!
Stimulating. concise, thought provoking and thoroughly entertaining, best two hours of televisual discussion I have had the pleasure of watching
Anthony Flew is considered one of the most prominent atheists, so he retracted his atheism and ،told us that the universe has a deity with modern scientific evidence, not with thought or dreams and feeling, but after science and modern discoveries about the existence of a Creator. He fell into another problem that the Creator wanted according to his mood
He wanted the Creator to be neither speaking nor hearing, and creating creation in vain
But it is logical that this Creator sends a messenger to teach us who he is. And we have to verify the authenticity of the Messenger and what this Messenger calls to?
It transports sperm from the liquid state to the eyes, heart, blood, arteries, and bones. Unconscious nature creates a conscious human being. Then this nature teaches about the importance of the heart and lung, then puts the rib cage, then oxygen, then water, there is sexual desire, and there are the genitals to complete the male and female sexual process. , What coincidence are you talking about, a coincidence that creates the male and the female. All of these are called verses and there are things that complement each other, there is a lung and there is air and there are teeth and stomach and in food and other things and we say that it has no creator!!!
The only question God will ask you is
focus on it
((He said: Did you deny My verses and did not encompass them in knowledge, or what did you do?))
I mean, God Almighty tells you what I told you is a lie and you cannot realize it or understand it
And what in the world have you been doing?
Do you know what your answer is?
((The decree will befall them for what they did wrong, and they will not be able to speak.
If you find yourself in the world without a choice in a great reality we live in, and you go without a choice and a question is the most important
If your destiny is fire, has God wronged you???ًً
Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, is a prophet from the Creator, and before him many prophets did not lie or deceive, and he is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator who created everything.
First of all, you should know that the religion of all prophets is the worship of one Creator who created everything. Islam today is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator and not idols, illusions, conjecture or a number of gods. But how do we know that the speech is from God and not from Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace? . These are some of the things that comfort your heart and believe that this is a prophet and many of the prophets before him
The Almighty said: (Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke)
The smoke confirms that the origin of this universe is inflamed. It is not a lake of water, as was the perception of all philosophies and religions that are based on illusion. This is one of the postulates of modern science today that the sky is condensation of smoke. This fact converted the French scientist Maurice to Islam and wrote a book entitled the Holy Qur’an on the scale of modern science
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty says: ((And the heaven We constructed))
The sky is a building, not a vacuum as it was thought, and this was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 that proved it
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty’s saying: ((And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
)).
That is, the sky expands with time. This fact, even in the time of Einstein, was not imagined by anyone and it was proven. And Einstein admitted it and admitted that it was the biggest scientific mistake he made in his life if he believed that the sky was fixed. The Qur’an before Einstein says that the sky expands
fact
Almighty’s saying: :((And We have made the night and day two signs, and We erased the sign of the night and made the sign of the day visible that you may seek bounty from your Lord and may know the number of years and the account [of time]. And everything We have set out in detail.
))
The verse of the night is the moon and the verse of the day is the sun. The Qur'an tells that the sun and the moon were fiery masses. That is, the moon was a fiery mass and was erased, and the verse of the day remained visible to the eyes. Was the moon a fiery mass and extinguished? This is one of the biggest scientific issues discovered about the moon. The moon was already a fiery mass, and NASA issued on its official website a conceptual clip entitled The Evolution of the Moon in the video. In fact, the moon was a fiery mass like the sun, and this is what the Qur’an told about and the truth of modern science.
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
Almighty’s saying
And you see the mountains thinking that they are rigid, while you will cross as the passage of clouds. [It is] the work of God who has perfected everything. In fact, he knows what you're doing.))
And the verse clearly spoke of a strange phenomenon, which is that the viewer of the mountains appears to him still, that is, they are still, but in fact they are not like that, rather they are in a state of constant movement. And the infidels of Quraish had previously accused our master Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, of madness, and it is likely that their joy was overwhelming when this verse was revealed.
They also found in it, according to their claim, evidence of this madness, and they told the people: How can you believe this man who says that these fixed mountains move like clouds moving in the sky!
And today it is proven that the earth rotates, and with it the mountains, how did Muhammad know that and why is he telling you instead of the matter that makes people consider him crazy? The matter was not from him, but from God.
Almighty’s saying
Those whom Allah (in His plan) willeth to guide,- He openeth their breast to Islam; those whom He willeth to leave straying,- He maketh their breast close and constricted, as if they had to climb up to the skies: thus doth Allah (heap) the penalty on those who refuse to believe)).
After man was able to reach the sky by flying by modern means of transportation, he knew that the higher up in the air, the less oxygen and atmospheric pressure, which causes severe tightness in the chests and the process of breathing. :
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before? It was not from him, but from God
Almighty’s saying
Or (the Unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depths of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hands, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!
Modern sciences have revealed that in the bottom of the deep seas with abundant water - the deep sea - there is great darkness, to the extent that living creatures live in this darkness without visual tools, but live using their other senses such as hearing.
These dark darknesses are not found in the sea water that surrounds the Arabian Peninsula, but rather they have been discovered in the oceans far from it
This verse shows another aspect of the Qur’anic miracle, which is that the sea wave that all people only knew was one wave in the seas
The verse says there is another wave in the depths of the sea, and divers discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century a fact that was hidden in the depths of the sea, that fact that shows another wave that throws divers into it as it is thrown at swimmers, and this wave was discovered by Scandinavian divers.
I will tell you what the Prophet said. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: One day the Bedouins who live in the desert will build tall towers, and this is my duty. Go and see where the
tallest buildings are and who owns them.
God Almighty: ((We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth. But is it not sufficient concerning your Lord that He is, over all things, a Witness?)
And God informed the Qur’an of this by saying: “Did you think that we created you without a purpose and that you would never return to us?”
All these and other matters that I have not mentioned indicate that this is a prophet from God..More important than that, as I told you, is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator, who created everything and before him many prophets.
Say, if you wish, there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God
speak from the heart
It is very sad and disturbing that there are so few of you-our society need more of you guys specially where i originally come from IRAN-bravo -amazing -i am certain that your contribution will have huge impact ----
Thanks to the cosmos for these two amazing human being. Richard & Lawrence I wanna see more videos like this guys. thank you.
Why more videos? They never explained how nothing gave something in this video.
Why do you all have so many thumbs down? I loved this video and I love the work that you great men are doing.
There's a lot of delusional people in the world; a LOT. But, the good news is: most of them aren't smart enough to own computers or are able to type. As of this writing (May 2019), there were 293 down votes and over 9,000 upvotes, which works out to around 3% of the viewers didn't like the video. Taken in context, I find this encouraging.
just consider them nothings.
These are not great men concerning the truth! They are men of corrupt minds! Here is something they will not tell you! First, there is no means of dating rocks to be millions of years old! No Radio Metric Dating methods can be trusted! Lead/ Uranium for an example: You can find rocks with radio= isotopes in them decaying, but you do not know the consistency of the rock at the very beginning: how much lead verses uranium was contained within it. Nobody knows! No scientist was present to see the decay process begin, just like no scientist was present to see chemicals come together and form living cells billions of years ago! Give me a break, give me some science, things I can observe, test and study. As for lead being found in a rock relative to uranium; there are other decaying elements that also turn into lead and leave no trace, that they were there in the beginning. All your assumptions, suppositions, presuppositions, speculative thinking all revolves around Darwinian Evolution being their axis of rotation. You know that coal seams, diamonds, gas and oil all contain carbon and are found in the geology of the earth, carbon only dates in thousands of years, not millions of years. I am afraid that evolutionists are barking up the wrong tree: Darwin's invented tree! Darwinian Evolutionary Religion is being imposed upon the masses, what a poisonous and toxic doctrine, Survival of the Fittest! Evolutionists are not true scientists, they ignore, disregard and suppress any evidence that goes against the sacred cow of evolution. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth? Kind Regards
They are called Christians
@@SydneyDrums The Evolutionary Origin of Birds
This is a matter of deduction, it is all guess work. Pure fantasy and imagination based on the artificial geologic column. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which this remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved. Impossible alterations needed in order to change a reptile into a bird: A “variety of feathers” covering the bird, growth of wings, strengthening of certain muscles, higher blood sugar levels and body temperate levels, this is a drastic change, total revision of respiratory, nervous and reproductive systems, lightening of bones in order for it to fly, new digestive system and instinctive behaviours, every specie is subject to irreducible complexity. This is a problem for Darwinian Evolutionary Religion and a bridge too far for natural selection based on random mutations relative to the genome. It is not possible to have a build-up of genetic complexity. Irreducible complexity speaks for itself. They say it takes about 20 transitional forms [guesswork] to change one- specie into another. Charles Darwin said, “As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Good question Charlie! The number of intermediate links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great!
A note on Comparative anatomy
This not evidence for evolution. It just means that when you have a good design you use it to create a variety of species. For example: the foot, knee and ankle. Man invented the wheel, utilizing it on carts, bicycles, cars, trams, steering wheels etc.
Evolution is on trial here not Creation.
If there were a number of evolutionists in a room with one creationist, who do you think would have the legitimate right to throw a stone? If the creationist said to the evolutionists show me fossil evidence of macro-evolution on a grand- scale. All the evolutionists would have to leave the room one by one, beginning at the eldest to the youngest; he would be left alone in the room. The creationist would be the one that had the legitimate right to throw stones at all the evolutionists, but he could not do so. Being a Christian he would show love and have mercy upon the willingly ignorant, praying that they may come to their senses! Being caught up in evolution being your occupation when suddenly the light comes on is not an easy position to find yourself in. As one molecular biologist said to me anonymously, that he could see design in all living organisms but he could not say he didn’t believe in evolution or he would be out of a source of income, words to the effect.
Objectivity of Science
“One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. To be forced to believe only one conclusion that everything in the universe happened by chance [my opinion doesn’t make sense] would violate the very objectivity of science itself. They [evolutionists] challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun? It is in scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom. It would be an error to overlook that the universe was planned rather than happening by chance.”
Dr. Wernher von Braun [Father of American rocket and space program]
The problem today is communism and a lack of scientific honesty, because evolutionists are hostile towards belief in God. This teaching is all part of the globalist agenda which will end in tears.
I would have liked to see Richard Dawkins debate a man like this.
I'm preety sure that our grandchildren will learn about Dawkins in schools as "the man who cured us of religion". As Lincoln cured slavery.
No, Hitchens is far superior
Nah, not sure about that. We have to go through the kicking and screaming years yet, you know where they smash up museums and blow up laboratories and kill students for 'learning'.
Cured by creating a new one, the worst one.
one can only hope
I just wish he would see that day with his own eyes. It would be a win for humanity as a species.
Brilliant and articulate people like these scientists give people the courage towards the truth and improving their lives.
Anthony Flew is considered one of the most prominent atheists, so he retracted his atheism and told us that the universe has a deity with modern scientific evidence, not with thought or dreams and feeling, but after science and modern discoveries about the existence of a Creator. He fell into another problem that the Creator wanted according to his mood
He wanted the Creator to be neither speaking nor hearing, and creating creation in vain
But it is logical that this Creator sends a messenger to teach us who he is. And we have to verify the authenticity of the Messenger and what this Messenger calls to?
It transports sperm from the liquid state to the eyes, heart, blood, arteries, and bones. Unconscious nature creates a conscious human being. Then this nature teaches about the importance of the heart and lung, then puts the rib cage, then oxygen, then water, there is sexual desire, and there are the genitals to complete the male and female sexual process. , What coincidence are you talking about, a coincidence that creates the male and the female. All of these are called verses and there are things that complement each other, there is a lung and there is air and there are teeth and stomach and in food and other things and we say that it has no creator!!!
The only question God will ask you is
focus on it
((He said: Did you deny My verses and did not encompass them in knowledge, or what did you do?))
I mean, God Almighty tells you what I told you is a lie and you cannot realize it or understand it
And what in the world have you been doing?
Do you know what your answer is?
((The decree will befall them for what they did wrong, and they will not be able to speak.
If you find yourself in the world without a choice in a great reality we live in, and you go without a choice and a question is the most important
If your destiny is fire, has God wronged you???ًً
Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, is a prophet from the Creator, and before him many prophets did not lie or deceive, and he is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator who created everything.
First of all, you should know that the religion of all prophets is the worship of one Creator who created everything. Islam today is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator and not idols, illusions, conjecture or a number of gods. But how do we know that the speech is from God and not from Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace? . These are some of the things that comfort your heart and believe that this is a prophet and many of the prophets before him
The Almighty said: (Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke)
The smoke confirms that the origin of this universe is inflamed. It is not a lake of water, as was the perception of all philosophies and religions that are based on illusion. This is one of the postulates of modern science today that the sky is condensation of smoke. This fact converted the French scientist Maurice to Islam and wrote a book entitled the Holy Qur’an on the scale of modern science
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty says: ((And the heaven We constructed))
The sky is a building, not a vacuum as it was thought, and this was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 that proved it
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty’s saying: ((And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
)).
That is, the sky expands with time. This fact, even in the time of Einstein, was not imagined by anyone and it was proven. And Einstein admitted it and admitted that it was the biggest scientific mistake he made in his life if he believed that the sky was fixed. The Qur’an before Einstein says that the sky expands
fact
Almighty’s saying: :((And We have made the night and day two signs, and We erased the sign of the night and made the sign of the day visible that you may seek bounty from your Lord and may know the number of years and the account [of time]. And everything We have set out in detail.
))
The verse of the night is the moon and the verse of the day is the sun. The Qur'an tells that the sun and the moon were fiery masses. That is, the moon was a fiery mass and was erased, and the verse of the day remained visible to the eyes. Was the moon a fiery mass and extinguished? This is one of the biggest scientific issues discovered about the moon. The moon was already a fiery mass, and NASA issued on its official website a conceptual clip entitled The Evolution of the Moon in the video. In fact, the moon was a fiery mass like the sun, and this is what the Qur’an told about and the truth of modern science.
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
Almighty’s saying
And you see the mountains thinking that they are rigid, while you will cross as the passage of clouds. [It is] the work of God who has perfected everything. In fact, he knows what you're doing.))
And the verse clearly spoke of a strange phenomenon, which is that the viewer of the mountains appears to him still, that is, they are still, but in fact they are not like that, rather they are in a state of constant movement. And the infidels of Quraish had previously accused our master Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, of madness, and it is likely that their joy was overwhelming when this verse was revealed.
They also found in it, according to their claim, evidence of this madness, and they told the people: How can you believe this man who says that these fixed mountains move like clouds moving in the sky!
And today it is proven that the earth rotates, and with it the mountains, how did Muhammad know that and why is he telling you instead of the matter that makes people consider him crazy? The matter was not from him, but from God.
Almighty’s saying
Those whom Allah (in His plan) willeth to guide,- He openeth their breast to Islam; those whom He willeth to leave straying,- He maketh their breast close and constricted, as if they had to climb up to the skies: thus doth Allah (heap) the penalty on those who refuse to believe)).
After man was able to reach the sky by flying by modern means of transportation, he knew that the higher up in the air, the less oxygen and atmospheric pressure, which causes severe tightness in the chests and the process of breathing. :
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before? It was not from him, but from God
Almighty’s saying
Or (the Unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depths of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hands, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!
Modern sciences have revealed that in the bottom of the deep seas with abundant water - the deep sea - there is great darkness, to the extent that living creatures live in this darkness without visual tools, but live using their other senses such as hearing.
These dark darknesses are not found in the sea water that surrounds the Arabian Peninsula, but rather they have been discovered in the oceans far from it
This verse shows another aspect of the Qur’anic miracle, which is that the sea wave that all people only knew was one wave in the seas
The verse says there is another wave in the depths of the sea, and divers discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century a fact that was hidden in the depths of the sea, that fact that shows another wave that throws divers into it as it is thrown at swimmers, and this wave was discovered by Scandinavian divers.
I will tell you what the Prophet said. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: One day the Bedouins who live in the desert will build tall towers, and this is my duty. Go and see where the
tallest buildings are and who owns them.
God Almighty: ((We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth. But is it not sufficient concerning your Lord that He is, over all things, a Witness?)
And God informed the Qur’an of this by saying: “Did you think that we created you without a purpose and that you would never return to us?”
All these and other matters that I have not mentioned indicate that this is a prophet from God. More important than that, as I told you, is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator, who created everything and before him many prophets.
Say, if you wish, there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God
speak from the heart
Courage towards truth.., ever attempted to make the completely obvious less obscure and more well defined? Like how the world's economic stupidity is both Not structured to maintain it's users, but is nothing more than a subversive way to enslave as many as possible by forcing a cost to simply have the basic needs for survival.., !!!!!! That's what it is, cuz it doesn't represent the value, importance, or what matters most in the lifespan of a Human.., it turns anything created for the majority to simply enjoy & maybe no longer worry about, into a service provided by the upper class, for which can not be paid off Ever! Basic needs made into a Service for which cost you to have automatically.., is Slavery. Try to get that Fact into people's minds..., Careful, their head may explode.., unbelievable... I fully agree with your comment by the way., LoL., Sorry for the slight rant but Seriously!! Just want to slap folks and say, stop it., what exactly do you think it is Huh.? Change The Mindset
I was brought up in a muslim family. Richard Dawkins gave showed me that there is a choice not follow any religion and gave me the power to escape this nuisance
I was too young to fully remember and appreciate my transition from Christianity to atheism. My question to you is do you feel more liberated now that you are a non believer?
I was brought up in a liberal secular Alevi familie. That's why as a child I have already discovered that there is no god.
How ? It’s impossible
@@AyshaAlhosanjwdym it’s impossible
I am an Ex muslim too .❤ I don’t believe that Jews became monkeys and pigs because they broke the sabbath and I also don’t believe that semen originated from backbone and rib 😂
Two intelligent people in a conversation. Ultimate entertainment.
@1:29:00 Pamphlets that say "Have you considered accepting Science into your heart?" LOL
that would be good
LOL... That would lose me some friends
@twenty twenty Yeah, like the theory that every time you let go of an apple it's going to fall to the ground - that's called gravity, mate, good luck proving that's not a fact.
@twenty twenty The thing is, the theory of quantum mechanics can explain and predict the behavior of particles amazingly well. The theory of gravity allows you to predict the trajectories of falling particles really well too. A theory is a hypothesis made based on existing observations to make predictions about the future. Some of them are wrong, some of them are right. Sure, there are people who present incorrect theories as if they are true. Not all theories are like that.
And your talk about justice and purity sounds like you're a moral objectivist. The problem is that morality stops making sense when you consider that a time will come when the human race goes extinct, whether because of their own stupidity, an intergalactic collision or the sun turning into a red giant and roasting us all. When there are no moral beings left, morality ceases to exist. Until then, enjoy your purity and righteousness.
God created man who use science through his own foolish endeavours. 😁
Thank God for Richard Dawkins!!! 😇
Anthony Flew is considered one of the most prominent atheists, so he retracted his atheism and told us that the universe has a deity with modern scientific evidence, not with thought or dreams and feeling, but after science and modern discoveries about the existence of a Creator. He fell into another problem that the Creator wanted according to his mood
He wanted the Creator to be neither speaking nor hearing, and creating creation in vain
But it is logical that this Creator sends a messenger to teach us who he is. And we have to verify the authenticity of the Messenger and what this Messenger calls to?
It transports sperm from the liquid state to the eyes, heart, blood, arteries, and bones. Unconscious nature creates a conscious human being. Then this nature teaches about the importance of the heart and lung, then puts the rib cage, then oxygen, then water, there is sexual desire, and there are the genitals to complete the male and female sexual process. , What coincidence are you talking about, a coincidence that creates the male and the female. All of these are called verses and there are things that complement each other, there is a lung and there is air and there are teeth and stomach and in food and other things and we say that it has no creator!!!
The only question God will ask you is
focus on it
((He said: Did you deny My verses and did not encompass them in knowledge, or what did you do?))
I mean, God Almighty tells you what I told you is a lie and you cannot realize it or understand it
And what in the world have you been doing?
Do you know what your answer is?
((The decree will befall them for what they did wrong, and they will not be able to speak.
If you find yourself in the world without a choice in a great reality we live in, and you go without a choice and a question is the most important
If your destiny is fire, has God wronged you???
Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, is a prophet from the Creator, and before him many prophets did not lie or deceive, and he is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator who created everything.
First of all, you should know that the religion of all prophets is the worship of one Creator who created everything. Islam today is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator and not idols, illusions, conjecture or a number of gods. But how do we know that the speech is from God and not from Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace? . These are some of the things that comfort your heart and believe that this is a prophet and many of the prophets before him
The Almighty said: (Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke)
The smoke confirms that the origin of this universe is inflamed. It is not a lake of water, as was the perception of all philosophies and religions that are based on illusion. This is one of the postulates of modern science today that the sky is condensation of smoke. This fact converted the French scientist Maurice to Islam and wrote a book entitled the Holy Qur’an on the scale of modern science
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty says: ((And the heaven We constructed))
The sky is a building, not a vacuum as it was thought, and this was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 that proved it
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
The Almighty’s saying: ((And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
)).
That is, the sky expands with time. This fact, even in the time of Einstein, was not imagined by anyone and it was proven. And Einstein admitted it and admitted that it was the biggest scientific mistake he made in his life if he believed that the sky was fixed. The Qur’an before Einstein says that the sky expands
fact
Almighty’s saying: :((And We have made the night and day two signs, and We erased the sign of the night and made the sign of the day visible that you may seek bounty from your Lord and may know the number of years and the account [of time]. And everything We have set out in detail.
))
The verse of the night is the moon and the verse of the day is the sun. The Qur'an tells that the sun and the moon were fiery masses. That is, the moon was a fiery mass and was erased, and the verse of the day remained visible to the eyes. Was the moon a fiery mass and extinguished? This is one of the biggest scientific issues discovered about the moon. The moon was already a fiery mass, and NASA issued on its official website a conceptual clip entitled The Evolution of the Moon in the video. In fact, the moon was a fiery mass like the sun, and this is what the Qur’an told about and the truth of modern science.
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before?
Almighty’s saying
And you see the mountains thinking that they are rigid, while you will cross as the passage of clouds. [It is] the work of God who has perfected everything. In fact, he knows what you're doing.))
And the verse clearly spoke of a strange phenomenon, which is that the viewer of the mountains appears to him still, that is, they are still, but in fact they are not like that, rather they are in a state of constant movement. And the infidels of Quraish had previously accused our master Muhammad, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, of madness, and it is likely that their joy was overwhelming when this verse was revealed.
They also found in it, according to their claim, evidence of this madness, and they told the people: How can you believe this man who says that these fixed mountains move like clouds moving in the sky!
And today it is proven that the earth rotates, and with it the mountains, how did Muhammad know that and why is he telling you instead of the matter that makes people consider him crazy? The matter was not from him, but from God.
Almighty’s saying
Those whom Allah (in His plan) willeth to guide,- He openeth their breast to Islam; those whom He willeth to leave straying,- He maketh their breast close and constricted, as if they had to climb up to the skies: thus doth Allah (heap) the penalty on those who refuse to believe)).
After man was able to reach the sky by flying by modern means of transportation, he knew that the higher up in the air, the less oxygen and atmospheric pressure, which causes severe tightness in the chests and the process of breathing. :
How did Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, know this fact before? It was not from him, but from God
Almighty’s saying
Or (the Unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depths of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hands, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!
Modern sciences have revealed that in the bottom of the deep seas with abundant water - the deep sea - there is great darkness, to the extent that living creatures live in this darkness without visual tools, but live using their other senses such as hearing.
These dark darknesses are not found in the sea water that surrounds the Arabian Peninsula, but rather they have been discovered in the oceans far from it
This verse shows another aspect of the Qur’anic miracle, which is that the sea wave that all people only knew was one wave in the seas
The verse says there is another wave in the depths of the sea, and divers discovered at the beginning of the twentieth century a fact that was hidden in the depths of the sea, that fact that shows another wave that throws divers into it as it is thrown at swimmers, and this wave was discovered by Scandinavian divers.
I will tell you what the Prophet said. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: One day the Bedouins who live in the desert will build tall towers, and this is my duty. Go and see where the
tallest buildings are and who owns them.
God Almighty: ((We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth. But is it not sufficient concerning your Lord that He is, over all things, a Witness?)
And God informed the Qur’an of this by saying: “Did you think that we created you without a purpose and that you would never return to us?”
All these and other matters that I have not mentioned indicate that this is a prophet from God. More important than that, as I told you, is the only religion that commands you to worship one Creator, who created everything and before him many prophets.
Say, if you wish, there is no god but God, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God
speak from the heart
What a delight it was to listen to this
I started watching this and became so reassured by their arguments for their cases,that it made me late for church.
The Folly of Fools is the book Rickard Dawkins was talking about at 1:38:00 for those who care
without these conversations , my childhood would have been filled with the dull lies of the institutions of religion. If there ever was a god, i'd thank them for these two gentleman
@Steve Loves them enough to burn them for eternity?
@Steve Many Christians disagree with you. Why is that?
@Steve Well then, my good-hearted Christian, forgive them and pray for them, but in silence, please.
@Steve Why?
@Steve Satanic? How?
We truly are living in an amazing era 🥺
"Professor Dawkins, do you believe in God?"
"Which one?"
"There IS only one."
That's what they ALL say!"
@Ari Onassis-Sugen No one here is trying to change your mind, Ari. But those who read this thread can see your intransigence and refusal to answer the question...as well as your repetitive statements. Your system doesn't change minds.
@The Word 10% isn't what I'd call 'very likely'. Typically, someone who types in all caps like you gets ignored, but your lack of logic is the most damning of your traits.
@The Word Who taught you how to type?
@The Word lol Wrong.
@The Word " dont be stupid"
good advice. For you.
I appreciate that they allow questions from the audience, but rarely/if ever have I heard a decent one.
There was a decent question: On the belief in a god by the suffering masses. [1h 39m]. Dawkins' answer? "Who cares"? Dawkins doesn't give a damn for the ordinary people. Notice how often he speaks of the 'elite'. He has lived in an Ivory Tower all his life. From native servants in British Colonial Kenya, to the finest fee-paying schools in the UK, to Oxford Uni. He still lives in Oxford. His praise of the warmonger John McCain as a good man, his utter betrayal of Julian Assange are only two of the monstrous views from this privileged buffoon. People should listen to what he actually says, rather than putting him on a pedestal he doesn't merit.
lol you can hear that it sounded good in their head but once they had to put it into words it got a bit vague and hazy then they tried to abort but had to actually ask something. and that's why your not on the stage madam. sit down. right next question. ha ha
"Bad logic, bad science, bad philosophy to say, Oh I don't understand it, so god did it."
This sums up overly religious folk.
Nothing did it. Bingo ! Happy ?
hahaaha... irony abounds when atheists do the same. 'because I dont know the reason, it's bad design'
Just take the example of recurrent laryngeal nerve. Dawkins knows shit about it, therefore there's bad design cause it loops; hence, there's no God. A nitwit. Superficial knowledge of science makes you an atheist. In depth knowledge makes you a believer
Nonsense, as will be demonstrated when you attempt to display your "In depth knowledge".
And nonsense already demonstrated when you characterize any atheist anywhere as ever saying "...hence, there's no god".
So which is it; does belief make people this foolish & disingenuous, or do foolish & disingenuous people fall for evidence-free beliefs?
In depth knowledge. Facepalm. Well, at least you folks keep us laughing; I just wish it didn't matter so much that so many people are deluded.
"Omar Moodie1 year ago
"Bad logic, bad science, bad philosophy to say, Oh I don't understand it, so god did it."
EQUALLY Bad logic, bad science, bad philosophy to say," Oh I don't understand it, THEREFORE EVOLUTION DID IT"
ITS THE EXACT SAME ARGUMENT DOOFAS!
The Truth Channel no scientist in any field has ever said I don’t understand something therefore evolution did it. Do you understand how the peer review process works? Hell, do you understand how the scientific method works??
Lawrence is one of the soundest of all these science guys. I wasn't sure of him at first, but he seems so down to earth, with no airs or graces, or narcissistic tendencies [Dawkins, Tyson respectively]. It is still a pleasure to watch all of them. But Lawrence is just himself, moreso than the others
Based upon all the interactions You've had with the other Scientists..?., wait No., It's from all the takeaways You've experienced after having watched the other Scientist's huh.?.
Richard Dawkins changed my life, not from changing my mind, but using evidence to allow me to realize I was correct in my thinking.
I almost cried when they started talkin' about Hitchens.
Yet trump lives😡😡😡
These 2 men are marvels and true talents in a world of muck. I would like to see the day when women/men like these are considered rock stars and HEROS that they are.
Rock stars? Your head is a rock.
The secret atheist/agnostic god. I HATE your god, the god of nothing. Your god claims to have given us the universe, fine-tuning of the universe for life, life from non-life, information for life before and after it began, the laws of nature, etc, etc, when we know that your god of nothing can do nothing. Your god of nothing has nothing to offer and its followers only offer nothing of evidence for their god of nothing. That makes them nothing of importance but the followers of the god of nothing are so delusional that they think they do have something to offer to defend their god of nothing.
www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html
The true God beats the crap out of the atheist/agnostic god of nothing.
It's the atheistic/agnostic types that supply the greatest comedy. They think the universe came about by natural means. There's NO science for it and ALL the science we know proves that creation had to be supernatural and done by a supernatural creator, but...., not to atheists/agnostics. Isn't that funny?!
You can't do it because you devoted your life to the god of nothing and love being a dumbass.---Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.----
Then the extreme order we have in our universe that defies all physics, but....., not to atheists/agnostics. It's just happened by mere chances even though we prove it can't happen by chance. Funny!
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
And life? Well, it just came from non-life. It's so absurd it's even hard to type that, but....., atheists/agnostics claim to believe it happened somehow by natural means. Again, funny!
Many have brought up such issues on how funny it is.
ruclips.net/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/L0-hgSjnomA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/E4uRWk06Wo0/видео.html
Ribosomes had to be there for life but ribosomes are far too sophisticated.
creation.com/media-center/youtube/ribosome-the-most-sophistcated-machine-ever-made?Ribosome%3A+the+%22most+sophistcated+machine+ever+made%22&.creation.com&Creation.com+Daily+-+US+-+Sun+09+Feb+2020+-+1009
Then, what this life did after it started by mere chance can't happen by science, but....., atheists/agnostics believe it did. Funny!
Life takes information to form and proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
ruclips.net/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/видео.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
Only fools don't believe God was involved.
ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
I've kept this very basic and brief. I can provide much deeper, yet there's no need to since each point proves there is no explanation for such things to have happened naturally. This IS evidence against such things happening naturally. Lame excuses of why it can still have happened naturally with no science to support it are just that, lame excuses.
There's a ton more. If you want a laugh, see what atheists/agnostics believe.
Time will tell its own story! The teaching of Darwinian Evolutionary Religion has given license to lawlessness, like there is no one to answer to for moronic behaviour. It has given birth to countless criminal acts of drug dealing, theft, murder, fornication, adultery, contract killing etc. It has promoted suicide particularly among young people. Darwinian Evolutionary Religion promotes fear and distrust greed and selfishness among people. It promotes wars; this religion is a dangerous damnable heresy and has done more damage than any other religious belief in history. It will be responsible for Armageddon the last great world war which will warrant the return of our Lord Jesus Christ in order to stop man destroying himself through selfishness and greed. Hitler justified his war based upon the evolutionary concept “Survival of the Fittest” but he went down with all on board! China, Russia and North Korea live by the same destructive rules. There have been a number of atrocities committed since Darwin’s book came out in 1859. This belief system has shed much blood. The wicked live by faith in evolution, we shall see who is right! Richard Dawkins mocks the Ten Commandments and those who believe in them. David Attenborough also mocks God by his continual Mantras of millions of years in his nature programmes. Richard Dawkins, David Attenborough and others, plus the media who promote the belief in Darwinian Evolutionary Religion have blood on their hands, because what you believe determines how you behave! Jesus was clear: Men shall give an answer for every idle word spoken. This also includes those in church denominations who do not teach the purity of the gospel account. Jesus did not lie to us, but told us the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The gospel of Jesus Christ gives belly ache to those who love what God calls sin. There is always a place of repentance at the foot of the cross, where Father God manifested his love for the world, by taking his only begotten Son to Calvary to be crucified for the sins of the world in order to bring us back to God, thus he created an open door; back to Father’s heart, a place of acceptance. The just shall live by faith! Salvation has been designed by God upon the lines of faith! Oh the wisdom of God! Righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach to any people!
These two never stop to amaze me. Im glad that slowly more and more people are waking up to reality and less and less people are being brainwashed by religion. Religion had its chance while we where in the dark ages and failed. Hopefully at the end of this century religion is mere history.
I agree. Medieval times were a mess. lol
Wonderful discussion between two of the most capable of delivering it to the public
I love Richard. I love how Lawrence introduced him. I love the handshake Richard gave him. I love everything about this.
"I love everything about this." What do you love with two dumbasses on stage? What do you love about two dumbasses saying we don't need a supernatural creator, it's possible that nothing did it. It's possible that we got the extreme order after creation by mere chance? That life just came about, somehow and all it entails? There is NO science for such foolishness, but you, you love everything about this. Amazing.
I do not respect him because he is vitriolic towards a God he does not believe in. How ironic! Dinosaurs Contemporary with Humans
Dr Don Patton PhD in geology studied at Indiana State University, Cambridge U.K and finally finished at Queensland University Australia, after 15 years of work, he earned an accreditation which was withdrawn by Professor Wilson who was appointed Head of Department of Geology and Mineralogy at the Queensland University between 1960 to 1986; because they did not like giving degrees to Creationists. He had to work another two years before he finally got his accreditation for his PhD.
He did excavations at Glen Rose Texas at the Paluxy River Bed, which yielded dinosaur footprints and human footprints in the same rock strata being Cretaceous lime stone that is supposed to be 140 million years old! Dinosaur bones can be eroded and redeposited, they can also be intrinsically buried and here is the difference, you cannot do that with dinosaur and human tracks that have formed from sedentary mud and have turned into hard rock. The Paluxy River bed contains dinosaur footprints that you can walk in alongside human footprints, destroying the myth that dinosaurs lived millions of years before man, they were contemporary. When sediment was washed out of the human footprints, you could see clearly 5 toes and relative heel prints in pristine condition. Human footprints, seen inside dinosaur tracks; which is conclusive evidence. There were 135 dinosaur tracks but 14 human tracks in a right to left direction, going from right to left through the dinosaur tracks, some beside and within, clear evidence for those of a sound mind. Evolutionists enjoy the term erosion, but it does not fit with the actual observed evidence. These have not been carved as they were excavated from under overbearing rocks. You cannot have erosion as an answer to pristine patterns of human footprints. These are desperate remarks from evolutionists who love to grasp at straw men. They were not carved, it is not logical; how do you get underneath overbearing rocks? The layers are about 6 feet of alternating clay and lime stone, and so the reasoning by evolutionists does not make any sense. Dr Don Patton presented his findings to the Tennessee State University to a group of senior geologists; he showed the tracks and explained the process of coming to his conclusion: dinosaurs and humans were contemporary. There were about 50 Grad Students of geology present, they could not argue with his findings, so they looked back to the Head of the Department for a response. His rely was ridiculous to say the least. He said, we do not know whether back then, that there were dinosaurs with human feet. Then Dr Patton replied and we do not know whether humans had dinosaur feet and he went on to say, if they were human tracks would they look any different than todays? The Head of the Department didn’t like that answer, so he just walked away. The Curator of the Dallas Museum of Natural History came down and so the evidence and went away upset, then he came again and went away upset. He came back the third time, having been thinking about the problem and said to Dr Patton, I know what these are, even though they look like human tracks, they really are not human tracks, they were made by aliens! He was as serious as he could be. They simply do not want to accept what is clear pristine evidence. Dr Patton replied, if they are aliens and more intelligent than us; being from a distant galaxy what are they doing walking about barefoot? He didn’t like that answer so he walked away. Dr Don Patton has presented his evidence to about 100 universities in America with no positive outcome in recognition of the facts. The Darwinian box is so hardly jammed upon their heads they cannot get it off and see sense. I have no respect for evolutionists who deliberately suppress, ignore and disregard any evidence against evolution.
He also said "some people are in denial of god", I'd like to point out that more people are in denial of logic lol.
Oh please, all people are in denial of some God, following that logic. They arrogantly blame you for denying their god, while they themselves deny all gods other than their own. I'm so glad I abandoned religion.
@@AnaboliKitchen couldn't be happier either
Gotta love the bad apologetics coming into this comments section. It's fun to read straight from the minds of the indoctrinated that believe they have a better understanding of the universe than two of the greatest minds of the past 50 years. The arrogance these people display while being utterly wrong is amazing and contains a biblical amount of irony. :=}
Thankful this discussion is still relevant today; questions raise our curiosity and intelligence, without hindering reverence to humanness. Science explains the fundamentals of life i.e ' Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Evolution Biology.' We would have better results speculating about the future where progress is hindered. Thank you again Richard Dawkins for Reason and Science, encouraging us to THINK and Ask Questions Lawrence Krauss.
Richard Dawkins has a masterful command of the English language and logical thought.
Great video and I do feel a lot of admiration for those scientists and intellectuals who try to cast some light into the darkness of ignorance and superstition. Must be often really frustrating to talk to deaf ears, the ears of those who have decided to believe the words of a book written thousands years ago and whose beliefs are on the same level of a Bronze Age people.
these two legends had me laughing the whole time I love them!
Brian Lindsay: Did you laugh when Dawkins, in answer to a question on the "suffering people, clinging to life, who believe in a god",(1 hr 39m) said "who cares what brings them comfort, who cares what helps them sleep at night"? Dawkins is an ideologue. People don't matter, only the ideal.
thing is the universe does not give a shit about us fact and humans in my view only make things worse by their nature they hate on each other kill each other and in turn spawn only more of the same I know this first hand so I will not comment on Richard and how he wants to behave but I can tell you he is not wrong in what he said
@@brianlindsay9838: What Dawkins referred to was their belief in a god, not their belief in a particular religion. To take away the last strand of hope from people in war zones, famines etc. is cruel and callous. You may know something of these situations, but Dawkins doesn't. He has lived a very privileged life, what need of a god for him? Who cares? Not Dawkins, that's for sure.
how do you know maybe he was bullied maybe he was mistreated by family or friends but yea it seems I will get nowhere explaining this to you and maybe they could do something about this bad life you speak of if they did something about it instead of hoping a non existent entity would help them can you not see the logic in that
watch the gray got to love the part when he begs god for help and nothing happens and then fuk it I will do it myself this is the kind of thing I am talking about begging the sky will get you nowhere it is just a fact of life and if you don't like it oh well that's life you are missing the point entirely
Thank you. It is Clear and Refreshing.
i wish i can have someone to have such convos with
I'll talk to you once I've had a couple of stiff G+Ts....I might not blow your mind but I'll curl your hair!
Dawkins says that if we believe life is unique on our planet then it is higly improbable that we can ever replicate it in a lab (and thus understand it). This point is quite new and very interesting. I think it deserves more attention!
This is a good point but never mentioned, I wonder why? First, there is no means of dating rocks to be millions of years old! No Radio Metric Dating methods can be trusted! Lead/ Uranium for an example: You can find rocks with radio= isotopes in them decaying, but you do not know the consistency of the rock at the very beginning: how much lead verses uranium was contained within it. Nobody knows! No scientist was present to see the decay process begin, just like no scientist was present to see chemicals come together and form living cells billions of years ago! Give me a break, give me some science, things I can observe, test and study. As for lead being found in a rock relative to uranium; there are other decaying elements that also turn into lead and leave no trace, that they were there in the beginning. All your assumptions, suppositions, presuppositions, speculative thinking all revolves around Darwinian Evolution being their axis of rotation. You know that coal seams, diamonds, gas and oil all contain carbon and are found in the geology of the earth, carbon only dates in thousands of years, not millions of years. I am afraid that evolutionists are barking up the wrong tree: Darwin's invented tree! Darwinian Evolutionary Religion is being imposed upon the masses, what a poisonous and toxic doctrine, Survival of the Fittest! Evolutionists are not true scientists, they ignore, disregard and suppress any evidence that goes against the sacred cow of evolution. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth? Kind Regards
It is much easier for me to believe that a self-replicating molecule first came into being after half a billion years, than a God who is so much more advanced than anything we can imagine suddenly appeared.
Is all about beliefs, nothing scientific. You see, you must believe, but you don`t know.
Waste of time. Believe in things you can see. You want to believe in something? Believe in Tom Brady. Now there is a GOD worth believing in. He answers every prayer and delivers every time.
Religious people seem to think that god is the simplest explanation. When in reality, it's a far more complicated answer, which leaves behind infinitely more questions than it answered.
@@iambaldfury You sound like Georgie Carlin
@@martinet1985 But George Carlin believed in Joe Pesci - and his baseball bat...
Inteligent. Thought provoking. Beautiful.
Wow, I watched this all the way through. Enjoyable from beginning to end!
A brilliant debate and funnier than any comedians I have heard in years.
First, there is no means of dating rocks to be millions of years old! No Radio Metric Dating methods can be trusted! Lead/ Uranium for an example: You can find rocks with radio= isotopes in them decaying, but you do not know the consistency of the rock at the very beginning: how much lead verses uranium was contained within it. Nobody knows! No scientist was present to see the decay process begin, just like no scientist was present to see chemicals come together and form living cells billions of years ago! Give me a break, give me some science, things I can observe, test and study. As for lead being found in a rock relative to uranium; there are other decaying elements that also turn into lead and leave no trace, that they were there in the beginning. All your assumptions, suppositions, presuppositions, speculative thinking all revolves around Darwinian Evolution being their axis of rotation. You know that coal seams, diamonds, gas and oil all contain carbon and are found in the geology of the earth, carbon only dates in thousands of years, not millions of years. I am afraid that evolutionists are barking up the wrong tree: Darwin's invented tree! Darwinian Evolutionary Religion is being imposed upon the masses, what a poisonous and toxic doctrine, Survival of the Fittest! Evolutionists are not true scientists, they ignore, disregard and suppress any evidence that goes against the sacred cow of evolution. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth? Kind Regards
I wish they could make a movie about Prof. Dawkins, would last a full year (at least).
This was so good. I am so grateful to have witness this ❤️
I truly miss Christopher Hitchens..😪 and I know these two erudite gentlemen miss him just as much. The world is a poorer place without Hitch, glad we still have Dawkins, Krauss, Harris and Tyson.
Miss Hitch's conversations with Dawkins......illuminating!
I'm really glad that they mentioned the work of Sam Harris when the question of free will came up... His book and lectures on free will are well worth the time.... and can provoke some quite troubling thoughts :)
Free Willy 🐋
I really like Lawrence's chair. And the conversation was nice, too. :)
Question everything
Knowledge is power
Seek enlightenment
Something from nothing is quite fascinating. It's like the origin of thoughts from nothingness, and taking these thoughts as ideas and manifesting them into physical realities.
you need to have a brain to have thoughts
In this comments' section: creationists who didn't watch the video.
Gilfoyle How ironic
Bolly Blob ironic moronic more like
@Ari Onassis-Sugen When they read the contradictionary bullshit in the Bible etc.
well they did lose me when they claimed their religion is the right one without any scientific proof
There's never any shortage of those.
Regardless of their religious affiliations which are none unfortunately and that’s just my opinion I enjoy these two guys they have bright, funny and creative.
God are these men brilliant. Whoops.
I love that the first words that Richard Dawkins says here are "Charles Darwin"
@TheWindAmongTheReeds because dawkins is the most notable heir of darwinism nowadays
Two of the great minds of our age. There's a lot of crap on youtube but there is a lot of good stuff. Let's hope some of the inhabitants of youtube develop a filter to be able to tell the difference.
Fittingly Richard is playing a big part in human evolution.
Christopher Hitchens is iconic, may he RIP.
@The Word You're a piece of shit... Really. Normally im not so judgemental right out of the gate but I've been reading through the comments and... Really you are just an amazingly shitty person based on what you've chosen to leave for public review and critique... Full of so much vitriol. It's actually a shame you speak in favor of these religions as I imagine you are a horrible example of any one of the major faith based moral systems.
@The Word And this is the reason why christianity is just wrong.
@The Word wow,what a stupid thing to say,you Sir a an idiot!!!
@The Word Bzzt, christianity is wrong in many things about reality and the world, and the few things that get right, are right for reasons outside christianity
So... sorry but christianity is still wrong.
@The Word Proof, facts and evidence that you are just wrong:
- The order of 'creation'
- Adam and eve
- The 'global' flood
- Moises
- The 'many' prophecies
- Creatardism.
- ThE eNd Of TiMeS!1!1!
@1:35:00 "Pigeon religion." I love it. The Mecca mechanism: the Mecca of the bottom left corner! You have to face it!
Has anyone heard any of the talks by James Tour ? He may only be a Professor of Synthetic Organic Chemistry - and hold a few other Professorships. Oh, and he`s also only a joint holder of a Nobel Prize....
But he might deserve an hour or so of your time if this stuff interests you.
Agree. He is a fantastic guy.
I've just read another article highlighted by professor Tour.
I've copied and pasted it below.
In a 2018 article for Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Edward Steele et al. concede the following.
“The transformation of an ensemble of appropriately chosen biological monomers (e.g. amino acids, nucleotides) into a primitive living cell capable of further evolution appears to require overcoming an information hurdle of superastronomical proportions, an event that could not have happened within the time frame of the Earth except, we believe, as a miracle. All laboratory experiments attempting to simulate such an event have so far led to dismal failure.”
At what point do we really say we don't know, and we have tried everything we possibly can and the more we try the more we realize how impossible life from non life becomes. Therefore the only logical conclusion is that God actually must have done it.
Given the advances that science and rationalism have made over the last couple of years I say it's earned the right to be given a lot longer to prove its case than the nonsensical Middle Eastern fairytales which have been disproved over the last two hundred years.
My son and I watched one of his talks, it was about abiogenesis. My son has just finished a chemistry degree, so was keen to hear this great chemists thoughts. However Tour cherry picked the science to insert a god. My son was very cross “Mum that’s just not true, he’s just missed out great chunks of working chemistry “ “Mum this guy is spinning the science, that’s not right “ etc .....
I won’t be watching any more James Tour
@@budd2nd sure sure your son is a genius and understands more than dr tour , did you just mentioned hi just got a degree?
@@antoniovaldez1929
You seem to have missed my point.
I’m sure Dr Tour understands the science. He just decided NOT to include it, in his lecture.
I can only assume, it was because by omitting it, it leaves a “supposed” gap in the scientific knowledge of Abiogenesis.
And that newly manufactured gap is a perfect to put his God claim into.
I suppose Dr Tour might just be unaware of all the data (the stuff he missed out) but I personally think that is unlikely.
1;32;45 The guy with the note not only hits the proverbial nail on the head but smashes it through the plank... well-done sir well done.
7:45
7 years ago... and now we can't even say we don't know where genetics came from- we have a lot of really solid ideas on that stuff today.
"There are really, really stupid people who disagree with me, therefore I am correct."
--Richard Dawkins
Still one of the best videos on the internet...
Wonderful as always
ah yes...the "Republican candidate" in 2012....the good old days when the world wasn't ending...
Huh?
Science, it is not a matter of belief, it's more like the antimatter of belief.
Christians claim to love God, yet also fear God. Reminds me of battered wives, that's why they are the "bride of Christ"..
and if the don't.... punishment. sounds like true love to me.
Interesting analogy.
Absolutely. That's why every nation has faced such issues with domestic violence because people are emulating the church.
Jason, Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
The bible says the fools have no delight in understanding. This shows even with the beginning, creation. Fools set their pattern from the beginning that they don't care about being logical, honest and scientific in their approach to the evidence, they just want what they want and to hell with the truth. So, show that you cherish a good pattern about creation and what follows. Show that you went through the bible and just didn't jump around but started with a logical process.
Did you ever read the first verse of the bible about the supernatural creation done by the supernatural creator, God? If you want to mock God, then you should have great evidence that creation happened all on its own. There is NO proof of that. Only a fool will even think that and accept it. Once that's accepted, then all the rest of foolish thoughts not caring about details will follow. Here is a great example of what a fool accepts. They started it by accepting a natural creation and is not embarrassed to show their ignorance from that point on.
So if you want to pretend you know what the bible says and took it in a sequential manner to understand it (which generally how books go), then show what a real bible expert you are and how much you love reasoning by giving evidence that creation happened differently from how the bible says it happened.
@@2fast2block science benefit everyone.even you who moke it.just because we dont have all the answers right now that doesnt mean that we will not find the answers in the future.20 years before we didnt know about other galaxies.100 years before we didnt even thought about going to the moon.biology,physics,chemistry,electricity,medicines,cars,aeroplanes,tv,phones etc are all products of science.
bible says that the earth is flat and that the sky and the stars are up in a tholos.bible has 2 stories for creation and they contradict each other.adam and eve were the first humans and their first 2 sons were Cain and Abel.Cain murdered Abel because god liked more Abel and Cain was punished by wandering.and after some time he found cities with other people.HOW THE FUCK HE FOUND CITIES WITH OTHER PEOPLE WHEN HIS PARENTS WERE THE FIRST HUMANS CREATED????!!!!!?????anyway i am not gonna make analysis of a stupid prihistoric book so just take your bible and put it in your ass.this way it will have and some practical use.
What a great discussion.
The guy i work for just wont stop with the come to church just have faith shit its like he needs my going to the crazy place to justify his IGNORANCE.
Mike Kennedy a close friend of mine from high school passed away unexpectedly a few years ago. I was visibly distraught at work the next day. I worked with a fundamentalist christian who was a very nice guy, definitely weird but still cool for the most part.
His only question was “Did he accept Jesus into his heart?” If I hadn’t known him as well and wasn’t worried about losing a job, I may have actually yelled “FUCK OF WITH YOUR ZOMBIE GOD BULLSHIT!” Alas, I just went with “I don’t know,” and went about my work.
What specifically is he ignorant about?
@@andrewdouglas1963 reality
@@SNORKYMEDIA
I suppose you have just guessed that rather than actually know. What aspects of reality do you think he is ignorant of?
@@andrewdouglas1963 yeah he can't answer that cause he or she is actually ignorant themselves, people who have profess themselves to be wise but became fools is the reality. If they only knew how much God loves them even though they don't believe in Him.
If the universe was created by an "intelligence," it would've been an accident. These laws may be complicated, but they are in no way "fine-tuned." Life may exist in this universe, and that's kind of an "accomplishment," but these laws you seem to have such high reverence for basically doom all life to extinction after enough time has passed. It's kind of ludicrous to think that this universe's physics were created on purpose.
We are fine tuned to the environment we live in. Proteins are created by the genes in responses to signals from the environment. If there is no protein for a particular signal it is made genetically. Go here for a presentation:
ruclips.net/video/jjj0xVM4x1I/видео.html
Start at 48:12
You can easily understand evolution, just think of the very different dog breeds man has produced in a relatively short time through selective breeding which is nothing else than man-made evolution.
+esthi signer and how many lions have they produced from breeding dogs? Man has been selectively breeding too for over 6,000 years, some royalty even inbreed, yet they keep getting humans!? Tell me, do you believe that snow flakes evolve all those different shapes? How about leaves on a tree, all different, is that evolution also? You must have learned evolution from Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins. Dawkins swears his cousins are apes, and even mentioned that some are rats. I think he takes after the rat side of his family, what do you think, .. because he looks nothing like those handsome ape cousins of his he shows pictures of.
+esthi signer I agree, this is by far the most understandable example of evolution
Bruce Wayne You mean 'by far the most acceptable' don't you? It's not like any sci-Fientist has ever observed one species evolving/speciating into another, and yet its been 4.2 billion Carl Sagan years that the 8 million present species been evolving, yet Evolutionists are not even looking for potential speciation, ... hmmm, .. makes you wonder if they believe in their b.s. or not, don't it?
They even admit it's labeling, the non-pure-white race evolved, .. or more like they are still evolving apes, from rats. Agenda 21 and 2030 will fix this "unsustainable mutant" problem since natural selection takes so long.
Hey crazedkiller.. and they remain bacteria. Let me know when they get a bacteria to mutate into a frog or something, until then, that ain't no speciation. So far all you have is skull & bones of monkeys speciating into skull and bones of humans through a story that spans millions and billions of years. What I don't understand is, how can these BB-Evolutionist put down, demean a book written a few thousand years ago, and yet accept stories on assumptions that spans BILLIONS and BILLIONS of years??? One was written thousands of years ago, the other (evolution) assumes what happened millions and billions of years ago. I mean come on!?
Odon Sabo look up "mudskipper," I think you'll find it interesting. Also age means nothing in terms of wisdom. I could write an entire book of bullshit today about how if I click my heels three times on a full moon I can turn into a bird and in 1000 years time someone could read that and make the same argument people make for believing the bible ("they were there, we weren't").
What's more, some future archaeologist could uncover any work of modern fiction and it would have the same likelihood of being true as the bible (which is to say, poor to none). However, a thousand years from now hopefully no one would believe my hypothetical bullshit story because they would know to apply the scientific method for determining whether a hypothesis has merit. I could write all this and be lying, but I could also be so delusional that I really truly believe it, and I could write it because I want to share this insight with the world and that's fine, but I would *still* be wrong and I would hope future scientists would call me out on that.
Furthermore, the idea that using leeches is a great way of getting rid of diseases is also a practice that spans millennia, yet would you reject modern medicine for this great insight if you contracted a deadly disease? No. Unless you are severely mentally ill, the answer is no, and the same applies for all scientific principles because they all come about the same way, and what's more *are open to criticism* and therefore change (for the better, hopefully). The world is far more wondrous and the universe far more amazing than any magical yet cruel fairytale would have you believe
I Couldn't agree more then and today; Educating Girls and Women is very important. Thank you .
As a Biblical Historian, I was relieved to hear Richard rescue me from oblivion.
Perhaps the "big bang" is a local event.
Like a pebble, thrown in the Pacific ocean.
This is not impossible, but although the idea seems to be a natural outgrowth of several (if not many...and it probably IS many, but I'm a simple microbiologist with a passing interest but no expertise in astrophysics or maths beyond a couple of growth/decay curves...) models, it seems bootless to speculate about regions that it seems we can never observe given that these putative "alternate 3D universes" formed by a peculiar phase transition of portions of uberverse at potentially differing "times" and maybe resulting in regions with different physical laws are hidden just as the centre of a black-hole is hidden, by an event horizon. It is actually a very convincing proposition that our universe IS a black hole...although the consensus appears to be not really, and the increasing expansion rate is actually a very serious puzzle at the current time.
Certainly we may come to refine models and we could assert that these other regions do in fact exist, this cannot, it appears, be experimentally measured in any meaningful way...and so it's just bootless speculation!
The observable universe will certainly keep us occupied for a while at any rate! XD
@@acerbicatheist2893
You may be right, but I don't think we are inside a black hole.
Life inside a black hole would be intolerable.
Ice cream would melt instantly and I'd never be able to stand up.
At 1:20 LK says, “Stanford University asked Richard and I...” Come on. You’re an educated man. We expect better.
Me thinks you are right!
I winced when he said that.
Sorry....this is the best video on the internet! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Richard we know your not Americain cause you are actually smart
I cannot understand how people know there is a god and people who say there is not. How does anyone know?
+Bevakasha I think it mainly has to do with the fact that it's usually something you grow up with. You can pretty much make kids believe everything...
Kirstine Otte Yes, your right
Richard Dawkins is asked this question all the time in his videos and interviews, and he often replies by quoting someone I don't remember the name of, but basically what that person said was: how do we know there isn't a normal sized teapot orbiting our sun? a teapot that size, no one would be able to detect with current technology, so no one can disprove it exists. But that of course doesn't mean that it makes sense to believe that there is a teapot out there, though.
Jacob Kauffman YOU’RE
Soooo.... if you're going to put god on the table as a "reasonable" possibility, are you going to put all OTHER equally reasonable possibilities on the table as well??? There are quite a lot of them. Infinitely many, in fact. Let's start naming a few: space leprechauns, moon dragons, underpants gnomes, sky-dwelling crab-bird-people, sea-dwelling bird-crab people, djinns, ghosts, demons, devils, cosmic unicorn flatulence, aliens from the future, future humans from the future, aliens from humans from aliens from the future who sent humans back in time to create humanity, virgin births, celestial metrosexual vampire marmot gods... I can back up any of these thing with faith alone by religious logic.
We could go all f*cking day with this futile bullsh*t. How does anyone know this... that... whatever. There are lots of things we don't know yet. Does that mean it's worth entertaining random bullsh*t to simplify and instantly answer questions about the natural world? NO!!! And it's dangerous because it fosters separation from reality and the threats to the real world. Like climate change for instance. If you don't know something, you shouldn't invent gigantically irrational, infeasible explanations like a "god" as even an optional explanation. It is such a specific, narrow-minded, singular, static, and unevidenced view to hold that it is better to not give it ANY thought at all, much like the few other "faith" based things I listed above. The question "how does anyone know" isn't even relevant. The point is that we cannot yet and should not pretend to know a shred more than can be ascertained or inferred with state of the art, objective, scientific observation.
Dr. Dawkins suggests that it is possible that in the universe that there could be sentient beings that would be so advanced to us that we would consider them gods. If these sentient beings are so advanced, is it possible that they would have discovered how the universe began? Further is it possible that such a sentient being could reproduce the creation of the universe? if such a sentient being could reproduce the creation of the universe, would any living beings created in that universe consider the creator of the universe to be a "god"?
+Robert Lee Good argument! But what is the origin of life of those sentient being? They can created the universe, but they cannot created human, otherwise there are 1000 kinds of human now. The final starting point of any universe or life must come to the same origin and this is the cause and may be called GOD.This is the God and final creator may be is the one in bible. Check it out.
"Awareness is known by awareness alone," is the sole irreducible axiom of reality. To put forth a syllable to refute it is to concede...
Blah blah
Krauss "you have to assume"
For the love of god, do not debate science with Deepak Chopra. It is not worth it. It is a waste of time and would amount to straightening a dog's tail.
@Felix Carpio While spitting out a plethora of his own fallacies and falsehoods.
1:02:33 *gasp* Dawkins believes in Cthulu! ;3
Thank you for making my day!
Energy is not nothing, Space is not nothing, Time is not nothing. Ready for my nobel prize, thanks.
ha ha. yip. by the way have you read my book yet?
I have a theory about God. Let's say there was no God and universe was created out of nothing and in that universe life flourished somewhere, an intelligent life and those creatures got so very intelligent that they could create their own universe and they created our universe and now we call them God. How does that sound :P
+zura iashvili its an interesting idea but completely over thought :^D go find some proof of it :D
+beshj Atheists really are a strange bunch. It is not difficult to comprehend that we do really exist and that the Universe exists. God or the Creator as I prefer to say, is self-evident, because the Creation exists. If the Universe did not exist then it would not exist. The fact is, it does exist. Therefore Creation itself exists, to belittle it and pretend that you understand it fully and that it is 'simply matter' or some other childish way of describing the un-describable is simply to show your pathetic ignorance. You are very sad if you cannot see 'God or the Creator 'everywhere. All matter has come from some kind of a Creation moment. Hence, Dawkins & Krauss are 'assholes'.
Kelly Clifford-Banks i can comprehend it, but there is no evidence. If you're a theist then you're a moron, if you're a deist then slightly less of a moron, but still a moron all the same. Not having answers doesnt mean making up fairy tales, we search for the answers and we find evidence to back our claims.
wow dude i love your theory. u need a name for it now. a cool name like x theory. but that very much could be the case. infact if indeed there was or is a god, i beleive it would be something along those lines rather than all mighty being.
I have something similar but here read mines.
I imagine there was civilization before that unlocked all the secrets to their place in space and time. They found out, they were alone. To them life was void, with no meaning. They realized that the most beautiful thing about living is the wonder of not knowing....so they created an infinite complex puzzle (multiverse) and shipped seeds of life into it.
They created their purpose, by giving purpose to something (us and perhaps other aliens in other universes).
I still need to polish it but this is the main idea.