mabbohabb Sometimes they are but sometimes they arent, like a good game is Tom Clancys Rainbow six siege, but a worse one is Tom clancys ghost recon wildlands, which is severely unoptimized and runs at a wayy lower fps then other games, on a gaming pc. Just because its one game doesn’t mean the whole company is complete trash.
@@ryan.8876 r6 is a good game? You can literally kick the enemy team from the match, even in competitive so if it you're losing just kick them out. Ubisoft is trash
Bruh, I'm not a Ubisoft hater in terms of their stories and gameplay...but every single one of their games uses engines that just don't work properly. 2 2080 TIs - Watch Dogs 2 - Barely 60 fps...wow.
I really hope Ubisoft optimizes their engine for good 4k experience moving to the next generation of games. Istg Watchdogs Legion needs to run fucking properly at 4k.
Considering most devs don't even consider supporting SLI, I think we shouldn't shit on the devs who do. In watch dogs, there was parts where the lows where much lower with 1 card, while staying closer to 60fps with 2.. so that in itself is a huge thing. Just no the highs there won't be much difference but who cares abou that.
4k too at that, i remember playing at 1080p medium settings with like 35 fps on my gtx 960 lol, i wonder how good the 3080ti will be or if AMD will somehow take the lead with big navi and how fast that might be
@Jack Benton theyve claimed it to be revolutionary tech, and its AMD theyve pulled some good things out of their ass before, im not very confident they will, but its possible. only time will tell
@Jack Benton im not reading that whole ass story you wrote but i can already tell your a fanboy who doesnt realize how much amd is stomping intel right now. only thing intel is slightly better at is gaming and the increase is only slightly better
Raymond Mataka nasa wallet be deeper then the hole to the Earth’s core. (There’s no hole to the Earth’s core and, this a joke before, some of you kiddies say so).
Bruh the electricity bill sees more growth than the fps, this feature shoud be killed of from mainstream gpus, there is just really no point for it to exist, other than rich enthusiasts waste a lot of power on 10% gain.
@@I-M-Achilles Firstly, if sli works, gain is more than 10% Secondly, there r people who want MAXIMUM perfomance and have money for that, and they buy it, because they can
me: this card cost as much money as i can earn in one month him: *imma take 2* Edit: Well, seems like my commentary has way more responses that I could ever imagine. I see that many of you don’t have the chance to offer such an object, it’s really interesting to have your views on the subject, thanks to all those who responded. I realize every day how lucky I am to have been born in France. Good luck to you all.
That SLI is for overkill and serious gaming, especially for those aiming for a stable ultra 4k 60hz or 1080p 240hz+ gameplay. It's worth it when you have plenty of money.
Good benchmarks. You could have included more games like Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Devil May Cry 5, Hunts Showdown, Destiny 2, Strange Brigade, F1 2019, Moto GP19, Ride 2, Hitman 2, Far Cry New Dawn, Kingdom Come Deliverance or Ace Combat 7. You can also make SLI work in Apex Legends with this profile (0x080000F5) and Borderlands 3 with this profile (0x080000F1). I'm currently on 2 RTX 2080s SUPER NVLinked with an i9-9900K. I should receive my new i9-10900K in a couple of days.
@@h_yd28 it's 2xRTX2080Ti, this video shows you how much gain you get from sli, you dont get 2x performance, you get +33 percent ish, so RTX3080 is like 2 of 2080Ti cards
@@TheXpresive Don't Depends on sli cuz it has different results! Watch rtx2080 videos and double the frames you see ao if it's 40 fps rtx3080 will be 80 fps ... ect
Hussein AYad yea but I think it’s like 25 or more on the graphic he showed for rtx 3080 I would love for him to show rtx 2080 ti sli vrs 3080 would really like to see that I know right now on this gaming pc I’m looking they have upgrade from 3080 woth sli of 2070 as no money down rtx 2080 super $400 more and 2 rtx 2080ti as $900 I don’t think they are that big different but that’s what they are showing I just want to see for my self hell I got a 2080 super I might put 3 supers in sli they be awsome if it would fit
SLI is really great if it works 😏 I wanted to play the following games, but they either not support SLI or I had other troubles with it. Battlefield V - only dx 11 + Nvidia profile inspector COD MW / Warzone - not supported Fortnite - not supported NfS Heat - not supported Doom Eternal - not supported Detroit - not supported World of Tanks / Warships - flickering Pubg - Nvidia profile inspector, shadows (ultra) flickering AC Odyssey - not supported Control - not supported ....
@@leafa95 There are some instances where SLI breaks certain apps (it could be the app's fault too) and you have to disable SLI in order to get optimal performance. Disabling SLI is not as seamless as one would think. You have to close a few processes/apps first before the switch can be made. I made a batch file to do this but it's still messy. I don't want to have to research nVidia Profile Inspector workarounds to get my games to work best nor do I want to settle for rendering bugs and artifacts introduced by some of these workarounds.
Nice review, im impressed u did excellent job! Tell me two things pls.. 1) What Monitor u used for the 2160p tests and 2) What is the max FPS u get in MW Warzone at 2160p with the single card?
Thank you 🙂 1. i used the Iiyama GB2888UHSU (cheap and old😅) 2. RTX 2080 TI - 1080p/1440p/2160p: ruclips.net/video/oV-cAvHIB6o/видео.html The CPU has no impact at 2160p.
Thanks for the video. I just wanted to add that SLI support in Watch Dogs 2 is very far from perfect. GPUs usage with SLi enabled is disproportional (much more than 1/2 of the single card usage), the game is a little bit choppy and sometimes also even laggy. I play on dual RTX 2080 Ti, PCI-e 16x+16x (Cascade Lake-X platform)
Nice watercooled setup. The GPU temps are spot on. 40c under load. I am trying to decide if picking up a second 2080ti for some sli would be worth it just for the fun of doing it. This video is helpful - thanks. What it says is, I need a 4k monitor or forget it.
weird I sold my 2nd 2080TI because in fallen order it was supposed to support it but it didnt give me a single fps gain. ended up being more time spent on trying to get it to work then enjoying games
@@RoliPoliOli00 nah, had a 9980xe for the Xtra pci lanes so there was no micro studders the 9900k micro studdered like crazy since it was only getting 8 lanes per card. But there was only a few games where it worked properly...but when it did it gave double the GPS and was truly awesome...with nvlink sli should come back but it probably wont
What you should be taking from this, for those looking for it, is that if you're only running 1080p monitors, you only need 1 card but if you go 1440p or higher, having 2 or even 3 graphic cards will keep your frames respectably higher and keeps them there because as soon as something intensive pops up, a single card will dip for that moment but those are usually he best moments so you want those to look the best.
Nice video, how was this tested in games that are not compatible with SLI, did you change something in the configs or didnt you change anything at all.
It's always more stable, and far less buggy to have one powerful GPU, rather than 2. This has been a hard rule in gaming ever since sli and crossfire were conceived. And pulling an extra 277 watts through your psu for a few frames just isn't worth the heat or the expense when every game shown here was more than playable, even gorgeous, with one gpu.
I am dissapointed with Nvidia and Intel, or perhaps game developers. OR WHY NOT ALL OF THEM? Now days you pay 2k$ in graphic cards (3.500$ PC) and 70$ in a game and still you only get 90 fps 8:35 WTF? And wtfk RDR2? Seriously 70 fps with 2 SLI 2080Ti? You are unoptimizing the game on purpose....
Because game engines and graphics are pushing modern cards (most expensive cards to the max. You're viewing this as a negative thing because you aren't seeing the long term bigger picture. Yeah it sucks that you struggle to get 90 fps, but it means that cards and games will continue to progress rapidly. The only person you can truly blame somewhat is game developers not making sure their games are fully optimized. You also have to remember that many games are console ports to PC. Hope you enjoyed my novel.
@@mercanyinriechert6732 yeah 4k @ 70 FPS in RDR2 is great in comparison to 40-60 FPS on 1440p with a GTX 1080 Ti @ 2.000 MHz and i9 9900 KS @ 5.3 GHz.......
@@mercanyinriechert6732 Not just SLI, graphics cards in general are performing way better in higher resolutions. As lower the resolution, as higher is the impact on CPU and vice versa.
Thanks for this video... I planned SLI in order to nail max fps, but now it seems that SLI doesn't pump so much fps as someone could think, gain is 35-45% more, not worthy IMHO
The sli most of the time of what i saw tries to give stable fps rather than giving a boost like 100 to 300fps and also depends on your monitors refresh rate. You cant expect 300fps on a 144hz monitor lol
SLi ain't worth it now It was good before for older games, you can't enjoy Red Dead redemption 2 60fps+ unless the game running 150fps at 4k max settings because a lot of fps drops in first mission Snow area with heavy storm and fog
What? I thought 2 of these would give insane results, like 4k at 144fps, but NOPE. Guess you will need 2 (maybe 3) RTX 3080Ti to get CONSTANT 144fps at 4k. Bruh.
Keep in mind he's using every bell and whistle in the graphics settings, most of which are wildly impractical and noone ever uses them. (16x MSAA for example) Normally you would easily hit 144fps with two of these, hell you can usually get 120+ with a single 2080ti at more practical settings. This was simply done to show how much more power you get with 2 SLI'd. However SLI is completely impractical for games and a waste of money since 70-80% of all PC games don't support it at all, just buy the single best GPU.
Sorry everyone my mother language is not English and I for sure used the joke badly, I would appreciate an example of a correct use of the joke in this particular topic?
Coming back in September being hyped as fuck about the 3090! I think it might deliver comparable results to this SLI setup but without all the problems and with DX12 support.
@@abt1580 Have had 2 1080ti in SLI for a few years now specifically for gaming. Never regretted it and holy hell was it worth it. Been gaming in 4K for around 4 or 5 years when everyone was saying it couldn't be done, but it was, and it ran great for those cards. My son still uses them. 2080ti I think was way too expensive so that sli was a pass. Looking forward to the next line and if reasonable enough, sli is on the table here.
I need help. I’m about to do my first build in a few days, and I need to know if a Ryzen 5 3600 will pair well with MSI GTX 1650 super Gaming X, or if that will be a bottleneck
@@_DerTypDa_ the bottleneck would be the GPU not the CPU. Unless you need the CPU horsepower I suggest getting a worse CPU and a better GPU eg. an rx 580 8gb or rx 590 and a r3 3100 you will be supersized the difference 8gbs of vram will make
I mean this shows that if I buy, lets say a 300 dollar card, get more money later, and drop another 300 dollar card in, I could at least see my frames go up as long as I dont chose the high settings to hard. Though I was able to run tomb raider and the bench mark said I got highs as high a 80 with my radeon 5600, and that was maxed settings, so umm I could only imagine what two of them could do. I mean sure this is to show case the high end, cream of the crop, but lets face it, if your willing to pop a few grand in a pc, What is a couple extra grand? I mean at this point your sorta flexing, and what is a better flex? Also the extra frames are nice, especially at the settings he is burning through.
Even a single RTX2080Ti you need 4k res to see it's true potential. Even 1440p you will see cpu bottleneck with RTX2080Ti. And that already paired with top of the line CPU with overclocks to boot.
@Hλwk block I kinda wish I would've gone with 16gb of ram instead and put the money toward a 5700 instead honestly but I'm super happy with it for the moment :)
watch the frametimes... stable 100 fps is much more enjoyable than average 130 with frametimes up to 30 ms and lows of 40 fps instead of 60 with single card. This is barely the same experience i had with my SLI setup, luckily i got already rid of this multi GPU bullsh*t, a strong single card will always win against slower cards in SLI, and the frametimes even show that a single GPU can also be better than a SLI config of the same GPU. every multi-GPU solution was pretty "useless" for gamers since ever, except the time as PC games demanded way more graphics power as PCs delivered, around 2004-2007. Now there are strong enough single GPUs aviable, at least its ok in my opinion, but i hope for a huge jump with next gen and HDMI 2.1 Graphics Cards
Kokainarienv0gel wait what, are we even watching the same video? I didn’t see a single time where a single card had better frame times in these benchmarks......
Its just almost middle Septermber 2020 and Nvidia just announced the 3080 and 3090 Cards. I am now seriously thinking, now that i already own a 2080ti .. to get me another for around 550€ and use it in SLI . I am quite Sure that the Performance should be close to a 1400 € 3090 . What you all think about this idea ?
The last generation I did SLI on was the 980TIx2. I found out that GOOD SLI scaling is game dependent. WatchDogs in this very video shows barely an increase. While SLI will net you better performance At higher resolutions it really isn’t worth it for price to performance. However if you have the money to spare by all means.
3:35 omg this is stressful. those dual or 2 GPU on the right makes a lag right there. how is this possible when things doesn't go the way as we expected?
late to game but thanks for video. NVlink long ago said its for higher resolutions and the gains aren't good cost vs performance but its not 0. If not going pro, don't spend so much just to play at 1080p
Fragmentation is still an issue in PC gaming and not enough is being done to solve this. Could you imagine the true gains you would get for such extreme high end PC hardware specs (and money) if a process and agreement was made for a minimum set standard of tier levels for PC gaming on the development and software support end to really eliminate the drawbacks of fragmentation in PC gaming? Instead of game developers having to use up so much time and resources targeting the lowest common denominator (which is not necessarily always mid range PCs), there was an industry standard development tool or "mode" that allowed you to design a game for a set standard of low, mid and high end with which the game will perform at a guaranteed minimum of 60FPS first and graphical details second which just simply "cuts back" graphics and what is left the PC gamer end user can choose. Intel, AMD, Nvidia, OEMs etc... would also have to agree to the three levels of minimum standards by providing development software for their hardware. The consumer will be better informed that their PC will perform at this minimum set 60fps standard, if they are made aware that this is the hardware range you will need to get.
You like 60 FPS and more -> 1440p i9-10900K + RTX 2080 Ti - 1080p, 1440p, 4K: ruclips.net/video/Y1K1pJHclZU/видео.html My recommendation 3440x1440 (21:9 Monitor with 120 Hz or more)..but I'm a fanboy from 21: 9 (AW3420DW is really fine)😁 - ruclips.net/video/EIj0g_PA9iQ/видео.html
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS It looks beautiful...the price is a bit.."ouch".. but impressive. I've never had a curved display, does it really add to the immersion?
So is SLI fixed and a good move finally? Or does micro stuttering and all the other issues from 4 years ago still exist? Cuz id really like to finally go SLI but all the issues put me off.
There are two major factors to consider. First one is strictly hardware: building SLI on HEDT with x16/x16 config and using second GPU for actually graphics and high res - good, using second card to whack the framerate on mainstream platform/low res - disaster. And the second one is that you really need to have at least a rough idea of what games you are going to play, because just getting a second card and hoping for the best is probably not going to work. There are a lot of games with good SLI support, both new and older, but you just have to have at least some kind of a plan.
Those issues still exist. The problem came with the tech itself so there is no way to completely eliminate them. They try to minimize them with hardware frame pacing but even when they work micro stutters still happening in some games. The golden age of multigpu have long gone.
@@arenzricodexd4409 Modern GPUs hide latency by having deep pipelines, so things like synchronisation with a CPU or another card is expensive. Another issue is balancing, it's possible to split a game frame in half and give each half to both GPUs, but what happens if one of the halves contains most of the hard-to-draw geometry ? The faster card has to wait for the slower card to finish before completing the frame so there are bottlenecks(stutters) added through that which wouldn't exist on a single card.
@@Roman-08-q9c в топовые матери... а кому нужны эти топовые матери когда любая мать от 10к потащит топовый проц... покупать их только из-за мостика что-ли?)
you have the frame cap on for battlefield 5. When you first install any battlefield it tops at 200 frames. look up how to unlock battlefield frames to get a fair result. Im not hating im just trying to help
So, even RTX 2080 TI SLI can't do 240 fps at 1080p, then what is the purpose of those 240 Hz monitors out there? Or am I confused between the concepts of FPS and monitor Hz?
i copied ur settings for red dead 2 and i around 60 70 to 80 frames idk what i had be4 but every time i went next to a waterfall or water my frames would drop to the 30s but ur settings fixed that for me thank you my specs are 2080 super i9900k
one thing i hate about SLI the fact that it doesn't justify its high price for the low performance it shows for the lowest fps. A dip by 50 or more fpss is high...Youd expect a flawless performance when you pay this much, but there are always problems...
Man are you recording with the same PC? Im getting 160 and above FPS on 1440p GTA V with a RTX 2070 Super and ryzen 9 3900x oc 4.5ghz, was very low fps for a rtx2080ti on 1080p
I like how I can still run these games at 1080p high and get 75fps on my 1650. This kinda proves how you don't need the world's best build to play the games you love.
Any chance you can redo this with 8k res included as well? What the fuck is with people saying there is no reason to go with an sli system?? That's obviously not the case...
So its basically 50 to 60 percent increase in fps!! thats not bad. what about a 144hz 4k monitor, does sli work that well on that thing as well, PG27UQ??
![Eminem - Somebody Save Me (feat. Jelly Roll) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwa0HenQMi4/mqdefault.jpg)
*RTX 2080 Ti SLI - x8/x8 vs. x16/x16: **ruclips.net/video/2NSlMWvEH3I/видео.html*
i9 9900K (z390) vs. i9 10940X (x299)
SLI. LOL. NVLink!!!!!!
RIP RTX 2080 SUPER OWNERS!
RedCurson I’m a super owner I’m probably going to buy the 3080 or the 3090 hell maybe a new pc after this shit
Can you also do rtx 2090 ti sli vrs rtx 3080 that’s what I want to see
benchmarks for gamers please buddy what is the name of the music you used in this video
2080ti: get ready for trouble!
2080ti sli: and make it double!!
Watchdogs 2: no
Gamerslife4me a pokemon fan I see
mabbohabb Sometimes they are but sometimes they arent, like a good game is Tom Clancys Rainbow six siege, but a worse one is Tom clancys ghost recon wildlands, which is severely unoptimized and runs at a wayy lower fps then other games, on a gaming pc. Just because its one game doesn’t mean the whole company is complete trash.
mabbohabb lmao what r6 is a great game
@@ryan.8876 r6 is a good game? You can literally kick the enemy team from the match, even in competitive so if it you're losing just kick them out. Ubisoft is trash
"Time to die" Ubisoft said :))
I love the fact that I was watching 2160p 200fps in 1080p 60fps
480p
1440p 60fps
@@aggressivetomate1393
"FelixTheFaux has left the chat"
@@thebatmanwholaughs219 I can't talk to you rn LOL
Watched a BSOD when I clicked the video,
Error: cant see more than 4gb gpu
I like how he organized the video.
Bruh, I'm not a Ubisoft hater in terms of their stories and gameplay...but every single one of their games uses engines that just don't work properly. 2 2080 TIs - Watch Dogs 2 - Barely 60 fps...wow.
Lol they call it future proofing
they suck at optimizing. Or i feel like they don't even care for it much. Just make a game good and release it.
I really hope Ubisoft optimizes their engine for good 4k experience moving to the next generation of games. Istg Watchdogs Legion needs to run fucking properly at 4k.
Considering most devs don't even consider supporting SLI, I think we shouldn't shit on the devs who do. In watch dogs, there was parts where the lows where much lower with 1 card, while staying closer to 60fps with 2.. so that in itself is a huge thing. Just no the highs there won't be much difference but who cares abou that.
He is playing in 4k, what do you expect?
200FPS in the Witcher 3.....
5 years ago that would be unimaginable
4k too at that, i remember playing at 1080p medium settings with like 35 fps on my gtx 960 lol, i wonder how good the 3080ti will be or if AMD will somehow take the lead with big navi and how fast that might be
@Jack Benton theyve claimed it to be revolutionary tech, and its AMD theyve pulled some good things out of their ass before, im not very confident they will, but its possible. only time will tell
@@justinc2633 expecting a Ryzen for GPUs
@Jack Benton im not reading that whole ass story you wrote but i can already tell your a fanboy who doesnt realize how much amd is stomping intel right now. only thing intel is slightly better at is gaming and the increase is only slightly better
@Jack Benton Lmao mate you're just being toxic in the comments chill
This man's wallet really be deeper then the Mariana trench.
Raymond Mataka nasa wallet be deeper then the hole to the Earth’s core. (There’s no hole to the Earth’s core and, this a joke before, some of you kiddies say so).
@@extradetails4686 theres no hole to the earths core...
This setup cheap bro, maybe just like buy a car, not that expensive.
@@justinc2633 there is none, it only exists in jokes.
Mas Pras Saja no it’s not
It's nice to see sli actually still doing work in some modern games, brings me back
1400€ ~ ish for 20~40%, Sli isn't as worth as it was decades ago
@@graphz07 it was like 40-80% in 4k, no sence to use that in 1080p
Bruh the electricity bill sees more growth than the fps, this feature shoud be killed of from mainstream gpus, there is just really no point for it to exist, other than rich enthusiasts waste a lot of power on 10% gain.
@@I-M-Achilles Firstly, if sli works, gain is more than 10%
Secondly, there r people who want MAXIMUM perfomance and have money for that, and they buy it, because they can
@@I-M-Achilles Sli is kinda meant to be a status symbol nowadays so what do you expect?
me: this card cost as much money as i can earn in one month
him: *imma take 2*
Edit: Well, seems like my commentary has way more responses that I could ever imagine. I see that many of you don’t have the chance to offer such an object, it’s really interesting to have your views on the subject, thanks to all those who responded. I realize every day how lucky I am to have been born in France. Good luck to you all.
@reattera OOF
@reattera The card cost the same, despite of the amount of the monthly pay in your country ??
@reattera It's the same price in France...
@reattera Yeah that sucks, fortunately my graphic card costs only 250€ (vega 56) The performances are the same than a RTX 2060
@Anton Babani That is nearly the minimum salary
That SLI is for overkill and serious gaming, especially for those aiming for a stable ultra 4k 60hz or 1080p 240hz+ gameplay. It's worth it when you have plenty of money.
2080 ti doesn't get 60+ frames in 4k on watchdogs 2 wtf... who made that. Oh yeah Ubisoft makes sense.
Dude..they are not 4k gaming cards.
So, RTX 30xx series came
this was exactly what i was looking for , thanks for taking the time to do this, great video
Good benchmarks. You could have included more games like Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Devil May Cry 5, Hunts Showdown, Destiny 2, Strange Brigade, F1 2019, Moto GP19, Ride 2, Hitman 2, Far Cry New Dawn, Kingdom Come Deliverance or Ace Combat 7. You can also make SLI work in Apex Legends with this profile (0x080000F5) and Borderlands 3 with this profile (0x080000F1). I'm currently on 2 RTX 2080s SUPER NVLinked with an i9-9900K. I should receive my new i9-10900K in a couple of days.
Patrick D. SIR HOW MUCH MONEY YOU GOT?
@@hoecakeee1 *had
Why go intel?
Monster Hunter World is another GPU bound game
@@nukliergeneral he probably is a fps junkee, which is why he is running sli, otherwise he probably wouldve went a ryzen 3950x with a single 2080
oh my god how much difference of fps. you can play safely in 4k at 100fps on average
For the low price of $2400 JUST for the gpu
@@korybabinski4159 😂😂
well fps always doesn't matter bro
the thing is constant 60fps > unsustainable 100 fps
the problem with sli is lag bcz of its nature
I imagine when the 3080ti comes out sli won't be needed, since I bet the performance will be better than 2080ti Nvlink on these games.
@@cappy032 3080 will not have sli at all ^.^ only 3090 will have this option and i think 3090 is something like titan card
And now RTX3080 is literally 2xRTX2080Ti SLI for 1/4 of price
Hope so, I now have to change my recently installed 650w psu for the dam card
2x rtx2080
Not 2080 ti
@@h_yd28 it's 2xRTX2080Ti, this video shows you how much gain you get from sli, you dont get 2x performance, you get +33 percent ish, so RTX3080 is like 2 of 2080Ti cards
@@TheXpresive
Don't Depends on sli cuz it has different results!
Watch rtx2080 videos and double the frames you see ao if it's 40 fps rtx3080 will be 80 fps ... ect
Hussein AYad yea but I think it’s like 25 or more on the graphic he showed for rtx 3080 I would love for him to show rtx 2080 ti sli vrs 3080 would really like to see that I know right now on this gaming pc I’m looking they have upgrade from 3080 woth sli of 2070 as no money down rtx 2080 super $400 more and 2 rtx 2080ti as $900 I don’t think they are that big different but that’s what they are showing I just want to see for my self hell I got a 2080 super I might put 3 supers in sli they be awsome if it would fit
SLI is really great if it works 😏
I wanted to play the following games, but they either not support SLI or I had other troubles with it.
Battlefield V - only dx 11 + Nvidia profile inspector
COD MW / Warzone - not supported
Fortnite - not supported
NfS Heat - not supported
Doom Eternal - not supported
Detroit - not supported
World of Tanks / Warships - flickering
Pubg - Nvidia profile inspector, shadows (ultra) flickering
AC Odyssey - not supported
Control - not supported
....
Can you still run thos games that dont support sli on your sli pc ? (Im new to pcs)
Yes, but the games only use 1 graphics card
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS i see thanks for clearing that up for me :)
BENCHMARKS FOR GAMERS can you quickly take out a graphics card to play one of those games and reinsert it when done?
@@leafa95 There are some instances where SLI breaks certain apps (it could be the app's fault too) and you have to disable SLI in order to get optimal performance. Disabling SLI is not as seamless as one would think. You have to close a few processes/apps first before the switch can be made. I made a batch file to do this but it's still messy. I don't want to have to research nVidia Profile Inspector workarounds to get my games to work best nor do I want to settle for rendering bugs and artifacts introduced by some of these workarounds.
Best yt chanal you helped and Entertain me verry much thx
Thank you very much 😊
Nice review, im impressed u did excellent job! Tell me two things pls.. 1) What Monitor u used for the 2160p tests and 2) What is the max FPS u get in MW Warzone at 2160p with the single card?
Thank you 🙂
1. i used the Iiyama GB2888UHSU (cheap and old😅)
2. RTX 2080 TI - 1080p/1440p/2160p: ruclips.net/video/oV-cAvHIB6o/видео.html
The CPU has no impact at 2160p.
Him: RTX 2080 Ti Sli vs Single
Me: GTX 1050 ti boii
Bruh GTX 650 here
9600gt bro
Bruh , I have a Intel HD Graphics 4000 in my on board processor.
GalaxyWølke intel HD graphics 2000 over here
R9 380x...this card Is still good
Gratulation for 2500 subs kepp it up
Thank you 🤗
Two years later and this card is still extremely impressive in my opinion.
Boy o boy i am waiting for this for a very long time. Thanks man for the comparison. I would really like to see how PUBG works.
I tested Pubg with an air-cooled system (2x 2080TI) - ruclips.net/video/hZh5y5CwRhk/видео.html
But i had problems with shadow (flickering)
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS can you make same for warzone
And till me the settings
Thanks for the video. I just wanted to add that SLI support in Watch Dogs 2 is very far from perfect. GPUs usage with SLi enabled is disproportional (much more than 1/2 of the single card usage), the game is a little bit choppy and sometimes also even laggy. I play on dual RTX 2080 Ti, PCI-e 16x+16x (Cascade Lake-X platform)
Nice watercooled setup. The GPU temps are spot on. 40c under load. I am trying to decide if picking up a second 2080ti for some sli would be worth it just for the fun of doing it. This video is helpful - thanks. What it says is, I need a 4k monitor or forget it.
as you can see, the Frostbite engine has a fps cap of 200. that's interesting.
weird I sold my 2nd 2080TI because in fallen order it was supposed to support it but it didnt give me a single fps gain. ended up being more time spent on trying to get it to work then enjoying games
Possible cpu bottleneck? Then again if you could afford 2x 2080tis you probably already had a decent cpu lol
@@RoliPoliOli00 nah, had a 9980xe for the Xtra pci lanes so there was no micro studders the 9900k micro studdered like crazy since it was only getting 8 lanes per card. But there was only a few games where it worked properly...but when it did it gave double the GPS and was truly awesome...with nvlink sli should come back but it probably wont
What you should be taking from this, for those looking for it, is that if you're only running 1080p monitors, you only need 1 card but if you go 1440p or higher, having 2 or even 3 graphic cards will keep your frames respectably higher and keeps them there because as soon as something intensive pops up, a single card will dip for that moment but those are usually he best moments so you want those to look the best.
Nice video, how was this tested in games that are not compatible with SLI, did you change something in the configs or didnt you change anything at all.
It's always more stable, and far less buggy to have one powerful GPU, rather than 2. This has been a hard rule in gaming ever since sli and crossfire were conceived. And pulling an extra 277 watts through your psu for a few frames just isn't worth the heat or the expense when every game shown here was more than playable, even gorgeous, with one gpu.
I am dissapointed with Nvidia and Intel, or perhaps game developers. OR WHY NOT ALL OF THEM?
Now days you pay 2k$ in graphic cards (3.500$ PC) and 70$ in a game and still you only get 90 fps 8:35 WTF?
And wtfk RDR2? Seriously 70 fps with 2 SLI 2080Ti? You are unoptimizing the game on purpose....
Because game engines and graphics are pushing modern cards (most expensive cards to the max. You're viewing this as a negative thing because you aren't seeing the long term bigger picture. Yeah it sucks that you struggle to get 90 fps, but it means that cards and games will continue to progress rapidly. The only person you can truly blame somewhat is game developers not making sure their games are fully optimized. You also have to remember that many games are console ports to PC. Hope you enjoyed my novel.
70fps @4k... in red dead....
@@mercanyinriechert6732 yeah 4k @ 70 FPS in RDR2 is great in comparison to 40-60 FPS on 1440p with a GTX 1080 Ti @ 2.000 MHz and i9 9900 KS @ 5.3 GHz.......
@@SokanSAN SLI scales better at higher resolutions... the single card was doing 40-45fps at 4k and the sli setup was doing 80...
@@mercanyinriechert6732 Not just SLI, graphics cards in general are performing way better in higher resolutions. As lower the resolution, as higher is the impact on CPU and vice versa.
Thanks for this video... I planned SLI in order to nail max fps, but now it seems that SLI doesn't pump so much fps as someone could think, gain is 35-45% more, not worthy IMHO
The sli most of the time of what i saw tries to give stable fps rather than giving a boost like 100 to 300fps and also depends on your monitors refresh rate. You cant expect 300fps on a 144hz monitor lol
Chaos Amv not how that works lol
if u rich AF then wait for the RTX 3090
Love how both of them destory my bank account
You misspelled rapped.
@Leumens Were would the word wrapped even apply?
@@akimbofurry2179 *where
SLi ain't worth it now
It was good before for older games, you can't enjoy Red Dead redemption 2 60fps+ unless the game running 150fps at 4k max settings because a lot of fps drops in first mission Snow area with heavy storm and fog
Nvidia : 1gpu +1gpu = 1.3gpu
Amd : 1gpu +1gpu = 2gpu
Nvidia : 1-2080ti = 2+ AMD gpus.
@@crazytech5755 that's right!
David Boggs for 3 times the price tho
U know these grapic card dont overload right?? Its just make them 50/50 work
@@sierraapples8099 Seriosly?
Can you please do a comparison between i9900k and amd ryzen 3700x with rtx 2070 súper im thinking in build a computer and Im doubting
Did it feel smooth or were you experiencing weird micro stutters driven by frame time moving around under SLi?
I don't think you need two 2080's you should give me one lol. Nice video btw
What?
I thought 2 of these would give insane results, like 4k at 144fps, but NOPE. Guess you will need 2 (maybe 3) RTX 3080Ti to get CONSTANT 144fps at 4k. Bruh.
Keep in mind he's using every bell and whistle in the graphics settings, most of which are wildly impractical and noone ever uses them. (16x MSAA for example) Normally you would easily hit 144fps with two of these, hell you can usually get 120+ with a single 2080ti at more practical settings. This was simply done to show how much more power you get with 2 SLI'd. However SLI is completely impractical for games and a waste of money since 70-80% of all PC games don't support it at all, just buy the single best GPU.
3 way SLI usually gives worse fps than 2 way. Also in most modern titles sli refuses to work at all. The ones in the video are some of the exceptions.
i just realized SLI scales great when you compare gpus in sli vs similar cuda core and vram specs and not against the card you are pairing together
Interesting, on battle field V, dual 2080ti make snow disappeared. What a magic!
how on earth is he keeping his gpu's so cold
Custom Liquid Cooling
Ice
Or REALLY good airflow
Liquid nitrogen
its in video description.... custom watercooling
Cpu bottleneck: exist
2080ti SLI: am I a joke to you?
? Doesn't make any sense
@@kaarelk274 well, put a SLI 2080ti, with an Intel core i5 from 3 gens ago, see what happens
@@aitorgallego98 Yeah, i know that. What ever this meme or shit is that you wrote, doesnt make anysense. Like, you're using it wrong or something...
You used it wrong bruh
Sorry everyone my mother language is not English and I for sure used the joke badly, I would appreciate an example of a correct use of the joke in this particular topic?
Coming back in September being hyped as fuck about the 3090! I think it might deliver comparable results to this SLI setup but without all the problems and with DX12 support.
I’ll save time for people: if ur gonna play 1080p don’t get 2 gpus but if ur gonna play in 4K 2 gpus are worth it
Well, it makes sense somehow... until the release of the next series.
When you buy 2 GPUs but only get a 10% - 20% increase in preformance be like
some games went 50% and no one buys sli for gaming purposes.
Newer games are getting better results. RDR 80fps in 4K.
@@abt1580 Have had 2 1080ti in SLI for a few years now specifically for gaming. Never regretted it and holy hell was it worth it. Been gaming in 4K for around 4 or 5 years when everyone was saying it couldn't be done, but it was, and it ran great for those cards. My son still uses them. 2080ti I think was way too expensive so that sli was a pass. Looking forward to the next line and if reasonable enough, sli is on the table here.
@@abt1580 same 90%
@@francischambless5919 could buy 2 new 1080 ti's for basically the price of one 2080 ti in my country.
I need help. I’m about to do my first build in a few days, and I need to know if a Ryzen 5 3600 will pair well with MSI GTX 1650 super Gaming X, or if that will be a bottleneck
will be fine
@@_DerTypDa_ the bottleneck would be the GPU not the CPU. Unless you need the CPU horsepower I suggest getting a worse CPU and a better GPU eg. an rx 580 8gb or rx 590 and a r3 3100 you will be supersized the difference 8gbs of vram will make
@@5AUC3 ye the processor is better than the gpu ofc but it wouldn't bottleneck extremely hard
So which one is better, getting two compatible gpu with sli/crossfire OR buy an expensive high end gpu?
So in conclusion is it worth $2400 USD to get a 40 FPS increase?
*no.*
exactly! That is the most expensive 40FPS upgrade I've ever seen.
True but sadly there’s no other option
Don't Pug with me Wait for the 3000 cards to come out.
Yes, because i'm a rich nerd
I mean this shows that if I buy, lets say a 300 dollar card, get more money later, and drop another 300 dollar card in, I could at least see my frames go up as long as I dont chose the high settings to hard. Though I was able to run tomb raider and the bench mark said I got highs as high a 80 with my radeon 5600, and that was maxed settings, so umm I could only imagine what two of them could do.
I mean sure this is to show case the high end, cream of the crop, but lets face it, if your willing to pop a few grand in a pc, What is a couple extra grand? I mean at this point your sorta flexing, and what is a better flex? Also the extra frames are nice, especially at the settings he is burning through.
1080p horrible improvement but 4k holy shit what a difrends...
Which monitor you used in SLI pc ( that 4K one)?
What cooling system u using for these? Liquid or air?
It would seem the higher the resolution the more benefit you get.
I would like to test it in 8k, but my capture card supports max. 4k.
Even a single RTX2080Ti you need 4k res to see it's true potential. Even 1440p you will see cpu bottleneck with RTX2080Ti. And that already paired with top of the line CPU with overclocks to boot.
Indeed
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS Instead of increasing the resolution you should better test in higher refresh rate.
@@abdolkarimmehrparvar6583 OK Zavala
now imagine what would be possible with 3090 sli
4k at 240hz baby
RTX 3000 wont support sli or nvlink sadly
@@m13_033 3090 has support for nvlink
I'm curious as to why you use 2gb of Ram more on the single 2080 setup? 2nd card just OK so it doesn't need much?
its good to see that even in 2021 a few games still work with sli/crossfire
64gb of ram seems like I same overkill, then again two 2080TIs is too lol
@Hλwk block lmao I'm not mad at it that's hilarious xD as long as you're having fun
@Hλwk block I have the little brother version of yours 3600x,5600XT and 32gb of ram
@Hλwk block I kinda wish I would've gone with 16gb of ram instead and put the money toward a 5700 instead honestly but I'm super happy with it for the moment :)
nVidia: "SLI is dead!"
Every game: "Not really"
watch the frametimes... stable 100 fps is much more enjoyable than average 130 with frametimes up to 30 ms and lows of 40 fps instead of 60 with single card.
This is barely the same experience i had with my SLI setup, luckily i got already rid of this multi GPU bullsh*t, a strong single card will always win against slower cards in SLI, and the frametimes even show that a single GPU can also be better than a SLI config of the same GPU.
every multi-GPU solution was pretty "useless" for gamers since ever, except the time as PC games demanded way more graphics power as PCs delivered, around 2004-2007. Now there are strong enough single GPUs aviable, at least its ok in my opinion, but i hope for a huge jump with next gen and HDMI 2.1 Graphics Cards
Kokainarienv0gel wait what, are we even watching the same video? I didn’t see a single time where a single card had better frame times in these benchmarks......
@@harrison00xXx strange brigade says different
Craig Hughes learn what „microstutter“ means, the SLI variant had much worse frametimes
@@havoc6021 Do i have to know "strange brigade", what ever this is?
What is the price of your pc on the right side
Its just almost middle Septermber 2020 and Nvidia just announced the 3080 and 3090 Cards. I am now seriously thinking, now that i already own a 2080ti .. to get me another for around 550€ and use it in SLI . I am quite Sure that the Performance should be close to a 1400 € 3090 . What you all think about this idea ?
I have the same idea 🙋🏻♂️
@@koraygu22 Big brain you two, why waste money when you can pull this off
@@professorclup1082 didn't spend that much money for the 2nd 2080 Ti, big brain...
Me watching it with Intel UHD Graphics
Every Ubisoft game: Imma end this man GPU career.
The last generation I did SLI on was the 980TIx2. I found out that GOOD SLI scaling is game dependent. WatchDogs in this very video shows barely an increase. While SLI will net you better performance At higher resolutions it really isn’t worth it for price to performance. However if you have the money to spare by all means.
Wonder how u are keeping the GPU temperature so low?
Who's here after 3090 announcement?
That's indeed once a life time experience.
Because you have just sold two kidnies for 2080 Ti SLI.
⚰️
3:35 omg this is stressful. those dual or 2 GPU on the right makes a lag right there. how is this possible when things doesn't go the way as we expected?
I'm curious to know why you are not using NVlink.
late to game but thanks for video. NVlink long ago said its for higher resolutions and the gains aren't good cost vs performance but its not 0. If not going pro, don't spend so much just to play at 1080p
How do you get so low GPU temps? My 2080 super is burning after a few minutes.
Fragmentation is still an issue in PC gaming and not enough is being done to solve this.
Could you imagine the true gains you would get for such extreme high end PC hardware specs (and money) if a process and agreement was made for a minimum set standard of tier levels for PC gaming on the development and software support end to really eliminate the drawbacks of fragmentation in PC gaming?
Instead of game developers having to use up so much time and resources targeting the lowest common denominator (which is not necessarily always mid range PCs), there was an industry standard development tool or "mode" that allowed you to design a game for a set standard of low, mid and high end with which the game will perform at a guaranteed minimum of 60FPS first and graphical details second which just simply "cuts back" graphics and what is left the PC gamer end user can choose.
Intel, AMD, Nvidia, OEMs etc... would also have to agree to the three levels of minimum standards by providing development software for their hardware.
The consumer will be better informed that their PC will perform at this minimum set 60fps standard, if they are made aware that this is the hardware range you will need to get.
what do you pref? 1x NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 2080 Ti 11GB GDDR6 (OC Ready)
or
2x Dual NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER™ 8GB GDDR6 (OC Ready) with NVIDIA NVLink SLI® Enabled
You have made a mistake in your description. It says 32GB Ram but you wrote 4x16GB.
how do you cool those GPUs tho?
Ill be buying duel 3080ti when they come out later this year, so pumped! Got 10k+ for a new gaming computer this year!
Wtf? Why are you going to spend 10k on a computer? Can't u get a bike or a car
@@blazesmooth5573 his money he can do whatever he wants. But 10k for computer seems a bit much
Ty for this. Am looking at a config with i9 10990k and an 2080 TI .. is sufficient to run 4k at a high rate or am I better off with a 1440 monitor?
You like 60 FPS and more -> 1440p
i9-10900K + RTX 2080 Ti - 1080p, 1440p, 4K: ruclips.net/video/Y1K1pJHclZU/видео.html
My recommendation 3440x1440 (21:9 Monitor with 120 Hz or more)..but I'm a fanboy from 21: 9 (AW3420DW
is really fine)😁 - ruclips.net/video/EIj0g_PA9iQ/видео.html
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS It looks beautiful...the price is a bit.."ouch".. but impressive. I've never had a curved display, does it really add to the immersion?
What impresses me the most is how cool a 2080 Ti runs even at 99% GPU usage. Impressive.
EK Water Blocks 😁
So is SLI fixed and a good move finally? Or does micro stuttering and all the other issues from 4 years ago still exist? Cuz id really like to finally go SLI but all the issues put me off.
There are two major factors to consider. First one is strictly hardware: building SLI on HEDT with x16/x16 config and using second GPU for actually graphics and high res - good, using second card to whack the framerate on mainstream platform/low res - disaster. And the second one is that you really need to have at least a rough idea of what games you are going to play, because just getting a second card and hoping for the best is probably not going to work. There are a lot of games with good SLI support, both new and older, but you just have to have at least some kind of a plan.
@@krzych3114 cool thanks. I'll remain single card for now
Those issues still exist. The problem came with the tech itself so there is no way to completely eliminate them. They try to minimize them with hardware frame pacing but even when they work micro stutters still happening in some games. The golden age of multigpu have long gone.
@@arenzricodexd4409 Modern GPUs hide latency by having deep pipelines, so things like synchronisation with a CPU or another card is expensive. Another issue is balancing, it's possible to split a game frame in half and give each half to both GPUs, but what happens if one of the halves contains most of the hard-to-draw geometry ? The faster card has to wait for the slower card to finish before completing the frame so there are bottlenecks(stutters) added through that which wouldn't exist on a single card.
Sad to see some games not supporting SLI. I’m waiting for the RTX 3090 to be released so I can build my gaming PC
две видеокарты пока что имеют смысл только для 4к 100 фпс, всему остальному просто не требуется такая мощность, даже рад что sli еще не умер))
@@Roman-08-q9c да какая разница, все это маркетинговые названия...
@@Roman-08-q9c и стоит как хорошая материнка, 120 баксов
@@Roman-08-q9c в топовые матери... а кому нужны эти топовые матери когда любая мать от 10к потащит топовый проц... покупать их только из-за мостика что-ли?)
you have the frame cap on for battlefield 5. When you first install any battlefield it tops at 200 frames. look up how to unlock battlefield frames to get a fair result. Im not hating im just trying to help
So, even RTX 2080 TI SLI can't do 240 fps at 1080p, then what is the purpose of those 240 Hz monitors out there? Or am I confused between the concepts of FPS and monitor Hz?
anyone notice in the first comparison the side with lower frames has snow sprites and the other does not.
How many games can support SIL? I think it is very few, right?
i copied ur settings for red dead 2 and i around 60 70 to 80 frames idk what i had be4 but every time i went next to a waterfall or water my frames would drop to the 30s but ur settings fixed that for me thank you my specs are 2080 super i9900k
one thing i hate about SLI the fact that it doesn't justify its high price for the low performance it shows for the lowest fps. A dip by 50 or more fpss is high...Youd expect a flawless performance when you pay this much, but there are always problems...
Man are you recording with the same PC? Im getting 160 and above FPS on 1440p GTA V with a RTX 2070 Super and ryzen 9 3900x oc 4.5ghz, was very low fps for a rtx2080ti on 1080p
Recorded with a 2nd pc (elgato 4k60 pro).
Used the same settings - 3:53
What about my pc build last week.. i used i7 10700 with rtx 2070ti 8 gb and 16 gb ram.. nearly took 140k indian money for complete build.
..
They added SLI Support for BF4? at release when i had 970 SLI there was no support.
how bad was the SLI microstutter ?
I like how I can still run these games at 1080p high and get 75fps on my 1650.
This kinda proves how you don't need the world's best build to play the games you love.
but does rendering now already start support sli or crossfire ?
How does SLI do with Ray Tracing? Does it gain anything?
Any chance you can redo this with 8k res included as well? What the fuck is with people saying there is no reason to go with an sli system?? That's obviously not the case...
Im amazed at how good this works, sli used to be very bad last gen. If you are rich you can play at 4k 100fps no problem.
So its basically 50 to 60 percent increase in fps!! thats not bad. what about a 144hz 4k monitor, does sli work that well on that thing as well, PG27UQ??
hi new. in this video , if single is 8Gb
, does SLI 8GB×(2) or 4GB×(2)??
Great video. Does SLI improve fps in VR? Can u show assetto corsa competizione in VR?
in battlefield v you have to unlock the fps. default is 200 fps lock. You do it through a cfg file.
Why is nobody talking about his insane cooling. GPU is at full load:40 degrees
probably just a custom loop pretty easy to set up your GPU to be watercooled