Thank you for this lecture, very enlightening. Please what is the interpretation, if the elasticity of gender is negative under the inefficiency model?
Dr. Shobha thank you for your explanatation. I have a question. You said that the most cost efficient firm will have a value of 1 in cost efficiency. However, according with your results, the cost efficiency score ranged from 1.05 to 1.34. The values above than 1 are cost efficiency or cost inefficiency? I mean, imagine the case that you have 1.3 and 1.5. The value of 1.5 in cost efficiency firm is more efficient than the value of 1.3? Than you. J
Thank you maam for uploading the vedio.. It will help me.. However one thing i need to be sure is that whether i need to to hateroscadasticity test before running the model?
Good morning Dr. Your commitment and dedication to share your knowledge is appreciated most. Thank so much. I am working a paper and applied this model and application. but when i try to run the frontier, it disappears. how can i solve such problem? My data is panel, having multiple outputs.
@@dr.shobhak6764: of course I understand, even before I decided my research thesis, I was watching you lecturer video multiple times and selected and engaged in efficiency measurement of commercial banks. My confusion is: MY data is panel data, the instruction files showed on the video are cross-sectional; second: I have multiple outputs whereas on your video single output. that's make me a bit confusion, otherwise your interpretation is so enlightening and amazing. Thank you
Plus: I have three inputs and three outputs, six explanatory variables as well. May have to add the explanatory variable with the input-output column? on the video: i observed 3-inputs, 1-output and two explanatory variables (Edu & age). so, may have to put in respective column?
MAM. I'm Going in a good way to estimate the technical efficiency or inefficiency of smallholder farmers of maize producers by following your video. I would like to say thank you again for your immediate response to my question. again today, when I regressed my data by frontier: how I can make it probability distribution; truncated, half-normal or exponential. transforming dummy variables from1, and 0 to 2, and 3 might have an impact on my result? thank you with respect
While alloting dummy variable note one point ..illiterate...1 primary..2..high-school. So allotment should be based on hierarchy. In case of gender it's left to the researcher
Bonjour Dr vos efficiences-coûts sont entre 1,05 et 1,34 Comment interpréter ca? Est-ce possible d'avoir une efficiences-coûts supérieur à 1 ou 100% ? A 100% , elle est efficiente A 134% , elle est ....... quoi ??
Madam! how do you do? I'm really amazed with your lecturers. wawu. by following your steps, when I attempted to estimate by frontier 41. after giving all instruction programs but there is no result given to me .what is the case of this my dear dr
@@dr.shobhak6764 thanks mam for the answer. Before i running the data in sfa equation should i do classical assumption like autocorrelation, normality, etc? I really confused about it
@@dr.shobhak6764 Thanks for the lecture doc, but concerning cost efficiency been above 1, isn’t it expected that cost efficiency should always be 1 and above since economic efficiency ranges between 0 and 1 and economic efficiency is the inverse of cost efficiency?
@@dr.shobhak6764 yes ma'am I did but not working. Ma'am plz help me out i have to submit report on monday. Plz share your email ID also so I can contact you
Thank you for this lecture, very enlightening. Please what is the interpretation, if the elasticity of gender is negative under the inefficiency model?
Dr. Shobha thank you for your explanatation. I have a question. You said that the most cost efficient firm will have a value of 1 in cost efficiency. However, according with your results, the cost efficiency score ranged from 1.05 to 1.34.
The values above than 1 are cost efficiency or cost inefficiency? I mean, imagine the case that you have 1.3 and 1.5. The value of 1.5 in cost efficiency firm is more efficient than the value of 1.3?
Than you.
J
Thank you maam for uploading the vedio.. It will help me.. However one thing i need to be sure is that whether i need to to hateroscadasticity test before running the model?
Thanks for this explicit explanation, pls how do go about economic efficiency. That’s my only worry now
Thanks
Have you managed the problem with economic efficiency?
Good morning Dr. Your commitment and dedication to share your knowledge is appreciated most. Thank so much. I am working a paper and applied this model and application. but when i try to run the frontier, it disappears. how can i solve such problem? My data is panel, having multiple outputs.
Slightest mistake will lead to this. Carefully go through the video
@@dr.shobhak6764: of course I understand, even before I decided my research thesis, I was watching you lecturer video multiple times and selected and engaged in efficiency measurement of commercial banks. My confusion is: MY data is panel data, the instruction files showed on the video are cross-sectional; second: I have multiple outputs whereas on your video single output. that's make me a bit confusion, otherwise your interpretation is so enlightening and amazing. Thank you
Plus: I have three inputs and three outputs, six explanatory variables as well. May have to add the explanatory variable with the input-output column? on the video: i observed 3-inputs, 1-output and two explanatory variables (Edu & age). so, may have to put in respective column?
MAM. I'm Going in a good way to estimate the technical efficiency or inefficiency of smallholder farmers of maize producers by following your video. I would like to say thank you again for your immediate response to my question. again today, when I regressed my data by frontier: how I can make it probability distribution; truncated, half-normal or exponential. transforming dummy variables from1, and 0 to 2, and 3 might have an impact on my result? thank you with respect
While alloting dummy variable note one point ..illiterate...1 primary..2..high-school. So allotment should be based on hierarchy. In case of gender it's left to the researcher
@@dr.shobhak6764 very understood!! thank you from my heart!
Hello sari fine i want to ask ,please could you help me by giving how to estimate allocative efficiency or command at frontier
Bonjour Dr vos efficiences-coûts sont entre 1,05 et 1,34
Comment interpréter ca?
Est-ce possible d'avoir une efficiences-coûts supérieur à 1 ou 100% ?
A 100% , elle est efficiente
A 134% , elle est ....... quoi ??
Sorry, may I ask doctor, I tried following your steps in the Frontier 4.1, however the output file didn't appear. Can you determine why? Thankyou
Yes me too doctor, can you help? Thank you ^.^
Either you would have typed the variable name. It should contain only numbers
@@dr.shobhak6764 okay thankyou doctor 👍
Whether i need to perform heteroscadasticity test before running the model? Maam please help me in this regard.
@@sibanideka7827 only when none of the variable is significant then you have to cross verify
Madam! how do you do? I'm really amazed with your lecturers. wawu. by following your steps, when I attempted to estimate by frontier 41. after giving all instruction programs but there is no result given to me .what is the case of this my dear dr
Maybe you might have negative or zero as a value or a slightest mistake.
@@dr.shobhak6764 waa.ok..if so yes,i have a value zero and negative.i will correct it. thank you dr from my heart!
Thank you mam this is so helpful for me. What kind of book that you use for running frontier 4.1 and interpreting it?
I need references for my thesis
Check the manual
@@dr.shobhak6764 thanks mam for the answer. Before i running the data in sfa equation should i do classical assumption like autocorrelation, normality, etc?
I really confused about it
Do normality test first. This is done to check outliers. Later after getting the results test the residuals for serial correlation and so on
May I ask, isnt efficiency score should be from range 0 to 1?
You are correct. If the firm is super efficient then it can have a score of more than 1
Dr. SHOBHA K ooo i see , thank you doctor, what about negative efficiency in production function? Is that possible?
@@hitzzzwhorld I haven't come across such situation. If it is then it would be most inefficient
@@dr.shobhak6764 Thanks for the lecture doc, but concerning cost efficiency been above 1, isn’t it expected that cost efficiency should always be 1 and above since economic efficiency ranges between 0 and 1 and economic efficiency is the inverse of cost efficiency?
Ma'am output file is not showing what to do
The slightest mistake is enough. Go through the video carefully and do it
@@dr.shobhak6764 yes ma'am I did but not working. Ma'am plz help me out i have to submit report on monday. Plz share your email ID also so I can contact you
please Dr shobha, can you give me your e-mail , l have some quetion for cost and profit efficiency by using frontier.4.1?
shobhagacecocbe@gmail.com
mam kindly share your email...