As a retired airline pilot with over 25,000 hours on B767/737 aircraft my problem is with the officially stated speeds of the aircraft that struck WTC 1&2. These speeds are 509 and 494 kts. The VMO of a 767 at sea level is 360kts, it’s max speed in a dive near sea level is 420kts termed VD. To think that a 767 can operate at 494/509kts is farcical for multiple reasons. First flutter of the tailplane and Wing tips due to airflow separation would cause aircraft breakup. Secondly operating this far outside the operating envelope would cause massively different flight characteristics which even a type experienced pilot would struggle to manage. None of the official story is physically possible. Do I know what actually happened.....no.
*"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG:* The Boeing 757 and 767: The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel. Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage. Structure Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings. The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767. SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/ \\][//
Mr. Perloff, Why don't you sell your book on your website? I saw Joshua Blakeney's book also price went up significantly. Yes, they don't want us to access to truth
9/11 WAS NOT JUST AN ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE OPERATION .. IT WAS PLANNED IN THE PRIVATE INTELLIGENCE. PRIVATE MILITARY.. AND THE PRIVATE FINANCIAL APPARATUS CONNECTED TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.. THE BOOK I AM WORKING ON ABOUT 9/11 WILL SHOW THAT .. ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE WAS DEFINITELY INVOLVED BUT THEY DIDN'T PLAN IT
At 1:08:00 the analogue celphones having a better reach and stronger signal, Why are these analogue phones taken out of circulation? Does anyone still own one, can they still be used and bought? Why is everything digitized, whilst e.g. music, according to experts does not sound as well when digitized as it does on analogue transmission (elpees, versus dvd). What is behind this? Is it part of the narrowing noose of surveillance on citizens? I don't know, is seems there must be a reason that all this digital signal equipment is pushed on us, on US..
It's a question of bandwidth. Analog phones were designed for a single conversation per radio "channel" and almost no data (that was pushed up to 3 using time sharing gimmicks before the final demise of analog). Digital "channels" can handle tens and even hundreds of conversations. The range in the higher frequencies (that support more bandwidth) is shorter due to physics, plus the desire to keep transmission power low for health reasons. An added benefit is that with smaller cells there can be more cell towers using the same "channels" in the same general area. As to digitizing everything, it's also a question of storage. Compare a bookshelf shock full of LPs (floor to ceiling), to a single MicroSD card. They both contain about the same amount of musical content, or to be more precise, there'd likely be plenty of room left on the MicroSD card for another bookshelf full of LP music.
9/11 was a systematic corporatist state event. Wall Street was not only in on it, but was and is the main motivator in the despotic state, and wars of aggression abroad. *The Global Empire fronted by Amerika Inc. is actually the spawn of international finance.* \\][//
I wonder if hurricane erin, which was coincidentally off the coast of NY on the morning of 9/11, had something to do with what happened to those planes if they did want to take them over the atlantic
Not a coincidence. The timing of the hurricane's approach is important to understand. It was used as cover for the Israeli submarine off the Atlantic coast that launched it's cruise missiles. There were no planes.
"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG: The Boeing 757 and 767: *The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel.* Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage. Structure Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings. The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767. SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/ \\][//
You are delusional and easily led aren't you? Cmon....it's aluminium vs steel and concrete. Smash you're steel car into a bridge abutment and see how that works out for ya. You're magical Kevlar aluminum ailerons and pieces and bits are fairy tale strength. Scientists and pilots alike say you're dead wrong. Planes aren't bunker busters. They would a crumpled like a fly and left a message below. That's common sense. Not common core.
If its a nuclear weapon, isn't the timing crucial? How do the buildings fall at 2 different times from the result of an explosion designed to hit them both simultaneously through the underground interconnectivity of the towers?! How would you time that with the other modes of demolition employed? Thermite, drones, missiles, d.e.w or plane(s) I can accept. Very difficult to accept a nuclear explosion the way Mr. Perloff describes it.
Check this video, it was 3 underground atomic bombs not one, its titled in spanish but its in english, all of the english versions of this video were muted. ruclips.net/video/YL97n602128/видео.html
@9:37 A couple problems exist with the thermonuclear bomb theory. 1) Nuclear bombs create seismic events. 2) Nuclear bombs create EMP waves that burn out all electronics within many miles. 3) Nuclear bombs do not destroy half a car and leave the other half untouched nor do they burn the door handles off the cars without destroying the cars.
*"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG:* The Boeing 757 and 767: The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel. Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage. Structure Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings. The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767. SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/
As a retired airline pilot with over 25,000 hours on B767/737 aircraft my problem is with the officially stated speeds of the aircraft that struck WTC 1&2. These speeds are 509 and 494 kts. The VMO of a 767 at sea level is 360kts, it’s max speed in a dive near sea level is 420kts termed VD. To think that a 767 can operate at 494/509kts is farcical for multiple reasons. First flutter of the tailplane and Wing tips due to airflow separation would cause aircraft breakup. Secondly operating this far outside the operating envelope would cause massively different flight characteristics which even a type experienced pilot would struggle to manage. None of the official story is physically possible. Do I know what actually happened.....no.
Jayson Montgomery cheers, let’s hope a real investigation is done before the real perpetrators die and justice is achieved. 👍
Thanks for your input. It's always great to hear from pilots and their experience. Just like the A&E911 movement
*"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG:*
The Boeing 757 and 767:
The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel.
Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage.
Structure
Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings.
The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767.
SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia
hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/
\\][//
+red3knight5 ruclips.net/video/5Zz04_-f0GE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/5Zz04_-f0GE/видео.html
One thing is for sure (at least). Israel had prior knowledge to 9/11.
I feel so honored that I got the RUclips Encyclopedia Brittanica tag underneath this video. Ha ha ha. RUclips continues to reveal their dark hand
Mr. Perloff, Why don't you sell your book on your website? I saw Joshua Blakeney's book also price went up significantly. Yes, they don't want us to access to truth
there was also a closed air force base in Massachusetts that hangers large enough to fit these planes. I don't remember the name
Westover AFB
CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN - "SOLVING 911" RUclips...
Excellent. Thank you!
9/11 WAS NOT JUST AN ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE OPERATION ..
IT WAS PLANNED IN THE PRIVATE INTELLIGENCE. PRIVATE MILITARY..
AND THE PRIVATE FINANCIAL APPARATUS CONNECTED TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT..
THE BOOK I AM WORKING ON ABOUT 9/11 WILL SHOW THAT ..
ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE WAS DEFINITELY INVOLVED BUT THEY DIDN'T PLAN IT
God. Because Israel likes others to fight it's wars for it and the US is stupid enough to do it.
Thank you, thank you. Great video.
At 1:08:00 the analogue celphones having a better reach and stronger signal, Why are these analogue phones taken out of circulation? Does anyone still own one, can they still be used and bought? Why is everything digitized, whilst e.g. music, according to experts does not sound as well when digitized as it does on analogue transmission (elpees, versus dvd). What is behind this? Is it part of the narrowing noose of surveillance on citizens? I don't know, is seems there must be a reason that all this digital signal equipment is pushed on us, on US..
It's a question of bandwidth. Analog phones were designed for a single conversation per radio "channel" and almost no data (that was pushed up to 3 using time sharing gimmicks before the final demise of analog). Digital "channels" can handle tens and even hundreds of conversations. The range in the higher frequencies (that support more bandwidth) is shorter due to physics, plus the desire to keep transmission power low for health reasons. An added benefit is that with smaller cells there can be more cell towers using the same "channels" in the same general area.
As to digitizing everything, it's also a question of storage. Compare a bookshelf shock full of LPs (floor to ceiling), to a single MicroSD card. They both contain about the same amount of musical content, or to be more precise, there'd likely be plenty of room left on the MicroSD card for another bookshelf full of LP music.
What I want to know is considering all we have learned about 911 why wasnt the insurance claim ever challenged?
9/11 was a systematic corporatist state event. Wall Street was not only in on it, but was and is the main motivator in the despotic state, and wars of aggression abroad. *The Global Empire fronted by Amerika Inc. is actually the spawn of international finance.*
\\][//
It was challenged .Insurance company took it to court .
THREATS AND POWER. But that's all about to change in the next few days. Larry's FUCKED
@@Idontwanttopickahandletoday Really? Where, what court? When?
I wonder if hurricane erin, which was coincidentally off the coast of NY on the morning of 9/11, had something to do with what happened to those planes if they did want to take them over the atlantic
Not a coincidence. The timing of the hurricane's approach is important to understand. It was used as cover for the Israeli submarine off the Atlantic coast that launched it's cruise missiles. There were no planes.
"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG:
The Boeing 757 and 767:
*The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel.*
Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage.
Structure
Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings.
The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767.
SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia
hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/
\\][//
Willy Whitten But on the other hand the WTC towers were designed to withstand impacts from the four engine B707.
You are delusional and easily led aren't you? Cmon....it's aluminium vs steel and concrete. Smash you're steel car into a bridge abutment and see how that works out for ya. You're magical Kevlar aluminum ailerons and pieces and bits are fairy tale strength. Scientists and pilots alike say you're dead wrong. Planes aren't bunker busters. They would a crumpled like a fly and left a message below. That's common sense. Not common core.
@@paulmeinart2851 great reply to
\\[]// there.
Aluminum vs. steel and concrete, a no brainer. Kinda like batman vs. superman....
thank you Bethany now remember
Rockefellers own that whole area and even dedicated a park down the street to his father Rockefeller Sr
This Video has truth in part the rest of the story is conjectures and theories.
If its a nuclear weapon, isn't the timing crucial? How do the buildings fall at 2 different times from the result of an explosion designed to hit them both simultaneously through the underground interconnectivity of the towers?! How would you time that with the other modes of demolition employed?
Thermite, drones, missiles, d.e.w or plane(s) I can accept.
Very difficult to accept a nuclear explosion the way Mr. Perloff describes it.
Check this video, it was 3 underground atomic bombs not one, its titled in spanish but its in english, all of the english versions of this video were muted.
ruclips.net/video/YL97n602128/видео.html
They're not pods they're the landing gear doors
@9:37 A couple problems exist with the thermonuclear bomb theory. 1) Nuclear bombs create seismic events. 2) Nuclear bombs create EMP waves that burn out all electronics within many miles. 3) Nuclear bombs do not destroy half a car and leave the other half untouched nor do they burn the door handles off the cars without destroying the cars.
I knew by the words he used that he’s full of shit and just regurgitating nonsense he’s read online yet truly doesn’t understand
Reported for anti-Semitic hate speech
HealthyAndrew idiot jw
*"And aluminum can’t effortlessly penetrate steel reinforced concrete."~Jayson Montgomery, WRONG:*
The Boeing 757 and 767:
The aluminum that modern aircraft are made of is not the same soft material as that of a beer can: Aluminum 2219-T81 UNS A92219; ISO AlCu6Mn; Aluminium 2219-T81; AA2219-T81 - with a tensile strength greater than that of structural steel.
Gross weights 172,365 kg (380,000 lb) and, from 1992, 186,880 kg (412,000 lb); further increased centre-section tankage.
Structure
Fail-safe structure. Conventional aluminium structure augmented by graphite ailerons, spoilers, elevators, rudder and floor panels; advanced aluminium alloy keel beam chords and wing skins; composites {Kevlar} engine cowlings, wing/fuselage fairing and rear wing panels; CFRP landing gear doors; and aramid flaps and engine pylon fairings.
The airframe further incorporates carbon-fiber reinforced plastic wing surfaces, Kevlar fairings and access panels. Boeing 757 & 767.
SEE: Boeing 757 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boeing 767 | FlightMemory - Encyclopedia
hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/911-disinformation-no-planes-theory/