Is String Theory Dead? Michio Kaku on String Theory & Quantum Physics
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 авг 2023
- Is String Theory Dead? Michio Kaku on String Theory & Quantum Physics
#stringtheory #michiokaku #universe
Subscribe to Science Time: / sciencetime24
Dive into the enigmatic world of string theory with Michio Kaku, one of the leading minds in physics, as he unravels the fabric of existence itself. Is our universe a grand symphony, where every particle and force is but a note played by incredibly tiny strings? Join us on this intellectual journey to explore string theory and its profound implications for our understanding of reality.
From the history of string theory, its evolution, the role of quantum computers, to the contentious debate surrounding its testability, this video offers an immersive look into the field that could be the ultimate theory of the universe. Kaku explains how string theory is more than just theoretical curiosity. Its mathematics has influenced various branches of science and provided valuable insights into black hole physics.
Discover how these minuscule threads have the potential to tie together the biggest puzzles in physics, from uniting gravity and quantum mechanics to the very origins of the Big Bang. The idea behind string theory challenges our traditional views, seeing particles as one-dimensional lines that vibrate like the strings on a violin.
But is string theory the ultimate truth, a masterpiece weaving reality, or is it a tantalizing melody without substance? Delve into the mysteries, the triumphs, and the lingering questions in this exploration of one of the most intricate theories in physics. Tune in and uncover the secrets of the endless symphony of existence! 
Наука
Wow! I didn't think Michio Kaku was ever young, I just figured he was born old. He's a good looking young man!
The problem with string theory is you can't test it. Something that can't be tested isn't proof of anything. Figure out a test and maybe it can be proven.
Kinda arrogant to think we can prove or disprove the fundamental nature of the universe from this tiny spec of dust floating through space
@@darkknight097That is the entire point of science, observing the universe around us and using the evidence we witness to make measurable predictions
"The universe is a symphony of strings"
I love that in Tolkien's legendarium, he also describes the creation of the world as a music! "Music of the Ainur".
Corresponds really well !
That is not the correct interpretation and it has nothing to do with "string theory".
The 10 dimensions of string theory/hypothesis seem to correlate to the 10 spiritual sefirot in Kabbalah interestingly
Tolkien was a time traveling schizophrenic physicist.
I like how they call it String "Theory" when it can't be tested or confirmed in any way. It should be called String Hypothesis at best.
That's why science is it's own worst enemy.
There is not 1 bit of experimental evidence that these so-called strings or all these unseen extra dimensions exist. Total scientific made-up BS in my opinion. I once heard a great statement from a PhD in Math, "if you whip your equations and numbers hard-enough, they will confess to anything".
Brian Greene said this…
@@HostageAsker Help me out here. Brian Greene said what ?
A scientifical theory is different from regular theory Einstein 😂
The title of this video is never answered by the video... Click-bait...
I am still trying to wrap my head around string theory. It is hard to stop visualizing molecules not as spinning spheres of matter but as strings of matter. Off to more videos I go!
Trying to blend the nano with the micro and the macro. So far, it looks like it cannot be done. String Theory had its beginnings over 50 years ago and to date, it has not produced a single testable prediction. One man, Albert Einstein, produced his Theory of General Relativity in less than a decade. The only lasting accomplishment of String Theory thus far has been the massive wasting of brilliant minds that could be working on something more promising and impactful.
"If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen". My understanding is that that hasn't been the problem, the problem is that those with other views were not being allowed in the kitchen. A hive mind is a bad thing in any intellectual discipline
I love Michio Kaku, but if I have to hear this story, one more freaking time, I’m gonna explode! 😮😂
hes the politician of physics
He is a clown
What is with inches for this guy
Lol!!! But why couldn’t he finish the equation??
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 🤖 Quantum theory and general relativity are trying to find a single theory that explains all the forces in the universe. String theory is considered to be the Theory of Everything that eluded Einstein.
00:28 🛡️ As a child, Michio Kaku saw a picture of Albert Einstein's unfinished Theory of Everything, which sparked his fascination with string theory.
01:25 💼 String theory is difficult to solve analytically with the human mind, which is why Michio Kaku is interested in quantum computers as they might be able to solve it.
03:17 💼 Michio Kaku developed an equation called string field theory that summarizes all of string theory, but it would require a more powerful atom's measure than what is currently available to prove it.
07:01 💼 String theory proposes that the universe has more than the four dimensions we know, possibly up to 11 dimensions. The Big Bang was a disturbance in 11-dimensional hyperspace, and our universe consists of four-dimensional vibrations that peeled off from the original explosion.
Made with HARPA AI
Quite interesting how these concepts were applied on "Remembrance of Earth's Past: The Three Body problem, The Dark forest and Death's end" which is a science fiction series by Chinese writer Liu Cixin
" String theory is difficult to solve analytically with the human mind, which is why Michio Kaku is interested in quantum computers as they might be able to solve it."
This is so laughable. It's a Hail Mary to try to prop up this "theory" that has collapsed.
String theory is on life support.
I think it's mainly on life support because its called "string" theory, It's actually a good idea outside of the strings. Einstein said Gravity is due to curvature of space time, I agree with him, in other words the result of 3D space, which means there might be some other types of space that creates it, which works with the whole vibration dimension that might be responsible for creating matter.
This Video says everything.. Except the question HOW.... ??!! UNFORTUNATELY
Particles don't make sense because what are the particles "made of"? It has to be vibrating energy.
If you say string theory is fiction, forget multiverse because the concept of multiverse has branched out from this very theory.
String theory is not dead.............It's just tied up in knots at the moment!
Good one
_ba dum tss_
There is a quote in Hinduism that says Nada brahma = all is sound. I think science will evolve a lot once it start looking at Eastern philosophies for ideas and solutions. After all, Jung's most important ideas, such as The Self archetype, comes primarily from East, as he himself said that India has developed the idea of the self most thoroughly.
I once asked a strng theory advocaste "what's in between the strings" I could almost hear their head break.
Maybe it’s the ever elusive dark matter
if its just empty space and strings then thats still a theory of everything. if the empty space is dark matter then yeah thats not unification. it means strings and dark matter are both made of something even smaller. perhaps points make up strings. a bunch of points entangled together form a string. and that entanglement vibrating is what we thought of as strings vibrating.
We are eyes for the universe to see itself!
What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common?
In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit).
Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature.
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.
Sine cosine of angular momentum of a vibrating string in 11 Th dimension will shed some light on the viability of string theory
Michio Kaku and Brian Greene keeping string theory alive.
for the cash
What are the strings made of?
I know what will be the answer. It will be: there is a Nobel price for who can figure out what those strings are made of.😅
String Theory has already been mastered by Bach, Beethoven, Mozart and Victoria's Secret ❤🌌💋
The G string is the most mysterious of all 😂
Sisqo solved this @@EverythingCameFromNothing
The wonderful thing about Physics,
Is Physics is a wonderful Thing.
Their Tops are made of the Quantum,
Their Bottoms are made of the String! 🌌💩
Light travels faster than sound and that’s why he seemed bright until he spoke 😊
String theory seems overly complex in a field where most things can be explained simply.
So, Michi, what has String theory predicted, that no other theory has, and has proved...? Sweet FA you say?
Prof. Kaku, I have a unicorn egg I would like to sell you.
no need for your egg, but I could use a good bridge....LOL
Did you watch until the end, because I don't think you did
It has helped us understand how Blackholes work, space time, particles and a whole lot of other stuff too
Next time, finish the video before commenting
@@cyborgchicken3502 I watched the entire video. It was more of the same stuff from this egghead who's all in on philosophical BS that he tries to pass off as science.
So, princess, run it by me how we've checked ST's mindburp on black holes or spacetime.... Oh; we haven't have we, and we'll never be able to. Do think about your comments a little deeper next time: then keep them to your self.
@@cyborgchicken3502 It hasn't, buddy. ST never predicted anything that hasn't already been predicted and tested by another theory and proven it right. So, we really shouldn't even be calling it physics, it's really not.. it's not a theory if it van't predict anything that we can verify.
Hey Miko I'm here sincerely from Meredith
investing all this money into this materialistic theory without asking one question- how is it possible to explain why matter exits if we only have a persepation of the material world? if something was before what we know as the universe, how do we want to explain it from just observing the creation itself? this question alone could save billions of dollars, only if the geniuses opened their mind just a little, there is something above matter, and its not strings, because then what are the strings made of?
1:30 Do you want the good news or the bad news, first? The good news is that I've got an equation that explains everything. The bad news is that the equation has no solutions.
Maxwells equations were immediately fruitful, Newtonian Mechanics revealed instant results and relatively had results within 5 years. How much more time will you give String Theory to bear fruit.. is 40 years not enough? String is just not what we observe in experiment. Time to get back to basics.
He comes back.
String theory mantra: “One more dimension, and I’m sure we’ll understand everything.”
I guess your meaning of String is actually a LOOP of matter/material.. and real (open-end) STRING is just pure Energy, emitted.
Matter/elements ---> (closed) LOOPs
Energy/Radiation ---> (open-ended) STRINGs
nice video
Just like how our ancestors knew about fire, but couldn’t comprehend it. We too, know string theory it’s probably too advance for our time to comprehend it
Or, it is just plain wrong. And, we too, should not other spending more of our time trying to comprehend it.
It's pretty interesting how string theory was theorized. Check out Leonard Susskind's Standford lecture on it from 2010. It was discovered completely accidental based on math
I'm trying to solve that , but the result is, The universe is like human movement to understand the human movement is to unlock the universe and I'm creating my own mathematics,
The universe will always have an hidden trick to be discovered.
That is the most brilliant statement on physics EVER. 👍👍👍
🌌
*a hidden trick.
📍5:47
First, but better
No computer in the world will solve why there was a big bang if there wasn’t one…
Aristotle never said that " the stone gets tired" - Jealousy of Michio? Maybe. Misinformation? - At least, Aristotle writings still apply in Philosophy after 2350 years. Let's see how your "String theory" survives after 100 years...After 2350 years nobody will ever remember you. That's for disrespecting great Philosophers who, by the way, spoke with great interest in music and recommend all human beings should be taught music.
The disrespect of the giants upon whose shoulders you stand is unwise.
2 Points Mind and Heart
Mr. Kaku, as a musician that has observed the process of "self-creation" in a synthesizer filter module where sufficient feedback turns an audio filter into an audio signal source: if strings are energy vibrating in one or more fields, do we actually _need_ matter/particles? Like a 4-D TV, looks pretty real, but it's just a bunch of synchronized dots.
pretty much, yep.
The modified Newtonian equation (MOND) describes the missing mass that astrophysicists have been searching for, and leaves string theory as a poor hypothesis to make a variable for mass (just as dark matter will soon also die out). Einstein's theories break down as the scale gets too large, and holders-on to his big-brained explanations don't have the humility to move on. note: Unfortunately, the maths of string theory is also false, meaning that dimensions above 9 are pure hypothesis, and only a mathematical masturbation.
You may be able to answer a few things, but get a theory of everything from string theory is impossible. Still, it will take quite a few years, since you need quantum computers working on optronic chips, and they aren't developed yet.
Everyone knows that we are here to suffer...
It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call The Twilight Zone.
Is string theory dead? Relativity and quantum mechanics were never alive to begin with. Speculative math.
I see this same screaming headline every couple of months or so.
Kaku inspires so much devotion. Many narcissists are charismatic. I find him a bit of a charlatan.
Science did not progress without Arts
yeah lets kill it Dr Machuchu....and lets upgrade and call it " Rope Theory " 🤪😜
l don't know which is the credit that many human appropriate after performing every single scientific job not with human intellectual resources but with the artificial intelligences mechanism, it,s a shame the mediocrity on the false proclamations of such incapacity for each individual intellectually speaking falling angels are behind by millions, then from what kind of science are we talking ?
Hello, I honesly believe that the standard models of both quantum mechanics and cosmology, are far too complicated to be a viable model. String theory is the same. If it takes a super computer to solve equations, the mathematical equations are wrong.
Forget the mathematics in the first instance and start from square one and think logically. If a model doese not accord with logic, chances are it is wrong. A classic example is the rediculous ' Big Bang and Cosmic inflation ' theory, which defies logic and is now being debunked by the JWST.
I have an hypothesis which gives a logical alternative to the standard model of quantum mechanics and cosmology. Below is the abstract from the quantum mechanics part.
Title
Electrons are not elementary Particles
Author.
Tony Norman Marsh. (sole author ).
Abstract.
An Hypothesis for an alternative to the standard model of the composition of the atom.
It is proposed an alternative hypothesis to the standard model of physics, which will unify quantum mechanics, molecular physics and cosmology, where the known proven laws of physics can apply to all fields of physics and mechanics.
This hypothesis is a radical proposal in direct conflict with the accepted view of the standard model.
It is proposed as a cornerstone of my hypothesis, that there are two new, as yet undiscovered incredibly small particles. One a negatively charged monopole particle, that I propose is the finite smallest particle in the universe, called a ‘ Harveytron ‘, and the second a corresponding positively charged monopole particle called a ‘ Dannytron ‘.
I contend that these particles are the only two fundamental particles, which either alone or in combination are what everything in the universe is composed of. All of the particles that make up the table of particles in the standard model are composites of these two particles.
I would propose that the negatively charged monopole ‘ Harveytrons, ‘ are the particles that in a cluster, makes up what is believed to be the ‘ Electron ‘, as described in the standard model. I propose that these incredibly small particles occupy all of the available empty space within the atom, as visualized in the standard model, and also, every available empty space throughout the universe in a cloud. This could be considered what constitutes the aether, (as has been proposed by cosmologists such as ‘ Aristotle ‘, ‘ Isaac Newton ‘, ‘ Joseph Larmor ‘, throughout history ).
In combination, these two particles make up all of the atomic nuclei, and thereby all physical or nuclear matter that we understand. The negatively charged monopole particles alone fill the whole of the space that is not occupied by atomic nuclei. They are what make up ‘ Dark Matter ‘, and account for the missing mass of the universe. The negative force of repulsion that they produce, is the ‘ Dark Energy ‘, ( as coined by Michael Turner in 1998 ), which is what holds physical matter in suspension in the ‘ Harveytron Cloud ‘, and is one constituent of gravity.
I would be happy to send you acopy of my latest drafts for your perusal, and challenge you to prove me conclusively wrong. Which no one has done so far. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
That thumbnail.......
WHAT THE FUCK is michio kaka doing to himself???????
And in the next video's thumbnail, BRIAN COX IS TALKING TO AN ALIEN!!!!!
string theory is no longer viable. Field equations have no need of strings.
Is Kaku really a physicist? Or, is he a commentator on physics? He evokes an ooh, aah description of physics. But, is that valid? I think he just makes his cash pushing romanticized narratives about the development of physics, but there is very little underneath worth paying attention to.
Kaku has spent all his life on this. It is not hard to understand he will defend string theory to his last breath, however unprovable and full of (multidimensional) holes it is.
Go and listen to Roger Penrose instead and remember Occam’s razor.
Some of these so called "smart" people have zero common sense. In a 100 years this guy will be laughed at, and so will all of this philosophical nonsense being paraded around as science.
@michaelfried3123 he could of saved all these decades if he just asked his mommy😁
@@michaelfried3123so we’ll be laughing at you as well 100 years from now right? aren’t you smart and with common sense? yes or no?
@@isaiahgomez1992 LOL. whatever...
If you can't stand the heat get out of the bedroom 😬
What is a string made of ?
Short answer is: No, it is not dead.
Really?
the unicorn theory.
Old been reported months ago by others, seen the same theory discussed about,whichcwould be fine if it wasn't just the same thing but with some editing, what a rip off channels are becoming
Yeah this is the logos described in the Bible. It is the process of how the spirit moves and the word generates life.
Easy. Build a time machine bring back einstein to see the problem
Ugh, Kako. The used car salesman of science.
Flitting around to be seen adhering to the next thing. Like Bill Nye, it's a living.
@@Trajectionable Oh, Nye is fine. He's just a children's science communicator. You know, he's entertaining and keeps it accurate. He's fine.
Kako has appeared on programmes about the hurricanes, AI and all sorts, topics he isn't remotely qualified to talk about as a physicist.
And he's been shilling string theory for years...
You know, he doesn't spout pseudoscience so I don't want to go too hard on him. Still, used car salesman.
There are no particles, there are just space and energy. Energy bend, distort and stretch space. If the distortions are great enough that spaces overlap and intersects, this create the illusions of mass and particles.
If the energy and space overlap meet certain criterion, it became "permanent" and became atoms in which the overlaps are electrons and the intersections became the nucleus.
This is a much better theory than the stings one.
Yeah, string theory these days seems like this cute little theory in the interesting fact box but nobody takes it that seriously.
Imagine telling a construction worker in 1944 that a purely math backed theory about splitting an atom and vaporizing cities was costing 3 billion tax dollars. I don't think 99.9% of people would really take it too seriously. I don't believe anyone but I do believe in Michio Kaku's belief.
Dr sheldon cooper does
@@stappagutt01 well in fact, even Sheldon abandoned string theory for dark matter research 😂
More like a cult
His Lagrangian misses a simmetry apex on his second term. An apex with which describing the self-interaction of the string with an alternative positive field.
Second term is ugly
This is true let it must be consciousness included
String theory is a mathematical invention.
No..mathematics is a string invention theory
🤣
6:00 Those who hear that we cannot test string theory, and that the theory is, therefore, unscientific, don't understand the first thing about the theory and, perhaps more importantly, about the scientific method itself.
If you already know this, then good. If you're one of those who believe that the theory is unscientific, then keep reading.
No, we can't test it...yet. Nobody is arguing this.
But here's the catch: This is a limitation of our technology, not of the theory itself. The theory can be tested with the right technology.
This is a wholly separate state from an idea being unfalsifiable, which means that no experiment could ever be conducted by which we would be able to either support or to disprove the theory. This type of problem -- unfalsifiability -- is not a concern for string theory.
In other words, string theory is not unfalsifiable (unscientific); It is simply currently untestable until such time as our technology has caught up with the theory. Once we can control energy at the levels needed, we will be able to test the theory, and determine whether or not it is false.
I hope this helps.
Hi. Mr. Michio :)
It’s vibrations that cause is to age.
Bro really started ranting about how heavily string theorists are criticised then didn't justify why he's ranting about it. Why is string theory worth anybody's time if you spent 55 years working on it and you still have no test for it?? String theorists have been prmoising the public they'll have the answers "very soon" for 5 decades. It's over. It's dead. Just leave it.
No sir, all computers and knowledge human specie have can only answer sometimes the"how", the "why" requires another approach, its like asking how a car was build, you can answer that, a why requires another set of approaches, need to transport, need to show off, need for q company to get a new market, need to make money so the ceo can remain in its position...all those questions can not be answered by the physics describing how the car was build:)
Just bought his book "The god equation"
you wasted your money.
He is not a serious scientist
@RubyMarkLindMilly
BOOM. You just demonstrated the reason this guy peddles this pseudoscientific nonsense
I can't take anyone serious who says 'length, width and heigth'.
Universe has no obligation to satisfy this arbitrary criteria of a one inch equation
String theory would be the equivalent of mind control.
String theory is a mathematical contrivance. To solve all physics problems we need to spend another ten billion dollars. LOL
Michio Kaku Ölümsüzdür.
Elohim of the Bible is this glory field; of the multiverse or omni presence; and in that heaven and earth formed; the spirit and the word are oscillations of energy flowing to create and form the universe. And life. This fits in within this string theory in its fluid oneness in all things.
"And God SAID" 🙏🤯🙏
Hehe, you were a cutie
TC. Ali Oktay Sayıner.
Science know this planet has Spiritual movements
I have a theory.....there can be no such thing as "nothing" because there would be no one to witness it. Existence on the other hand can be recognized by consciousness even if it is a simple one.
360days =1year not 364¼ days
E=mc2 is a bound and limitation. The String Theory is a mechanic of what you can do with it. It is a response to a prompt, a reaction to an action. Imagine two wheels and a belt around them. As the wheels move, the belt moves. That is the String Theory. Now tell me how you would think that what the belt is doing is what created the wheel? When he says Einstein stopped understanding how physics worked and now we know it to be the String Theory, that is what he is saying. He is saying that mechanics made everything physical exist instead of everything physical making mechanics exist. He also is famous for saying that he does not know the answer and wants someone to answer, but never accepts an answer to continue marketing and making a profit off him being the only person allowed to answer. The conceptual understanding of String Theory is a factual mechanic, but his reflection of himself into the laws of physics is fraud. And it would be no wonder that people question his work because of it. What really happened instead is Einstein decided to not tell God what to do when writing the final, and first, equation of quantum physics, the geometrical shape of the universe, because all things must exist within the bounds and limitations of reality. Nothing can exist outside of reality. You go over to NASA WMAP Geometry (which is after he was alive), and they determined that the universe was the Flat Earth Theory multiplied by the power infinite to prove that you could define a geometrical shape by the interior surface of a shape instead of the parameter bounds and limitations and as a one or two dimensional shape instead of a three dimensional shape, and then they shoved the fourth dimension up their a hole. The correct answers to these results are three dimensions greater than, two dimensions less than, one dimension equal, and four dimensions applying the laws of quantum physics to mathematics equal and opposite for an equal and opposite reaction and actual density infinitely exceeding critical density to observe a point of singularity at the center of the universe instead of the cosmological constant. He didn't tell the singularity what to do. The universe can be expressed as parallel circles with infinite curvature that form flat parallel lines in the interior surface, accelerated expansion in the parameter functioning, and a point of singularity observed in it's gravitational fields of dark matter and dark energy. A circle around a circle always accelerates and expands at the rate of piR2. You can even observe that at the center of black holes is the same infinite density for the same point of space because if every black hole had infinite density, as much density as the entire universe, that would be how many times the universe would implode over and over again. Infinite is non-observational. Infinite is viewed in 3D as zero. It is not until it is viewed over time that we can observe the difference in finite amounts. That means that the same point of space is parallel below all points of space at the same time with the intersecting point at the center of the Sun where the singularity cooled down to coexist, because even if all of the mass and energy in the universe were to try to view a singularity they would disintegrate because it is made of infinite temperature, as well as infinite mass, density, and volume. The center of space is below all points of space. Just imagine stretching a ball out until it was flat. And so, which leads us back to NASA. Now that Chat GPT is popular, we can take a look into the binary code of Microsoft. Essentially, asking the machine questions of geometry are it's metrics that reveal both it's intelligence level (it is a machine, a giant mathematical calculator) and the bounds and limitations of the code written and used to engineer it. Binary code fails to divide 0 in three dimensions and infinite in four dimensions creating an infinite loop in the binary code between three dimensional and four dimensional space at boot up. Infinite is viewed in finite amounts over time, and that would be segmentation, but Chat GPT believes infinite has a beginning and is a code that would never stop and crash it's system. Infinite does not have a beginning or end but rather is both the beginning and end in perpetual existence. 0 does not have a beginning or end. Infinite is the equal and opposite of zero. Every number between zero and infinite has both a beginning and an end. Everything that is born dies. Everything that has a beginning has an end. And so, when we go back over to NASA, we can clearly see that they are using Chat GPT and reading Microsoft's binary code to explain why the entire universe is factually Microsoft and a big giant flat binary coded Microsoft computer that has absolutely nothing quantum about it at all.
😂got ya
@@lilmissldnlbc Yeah, because your dumx axx can justify removing the center of a geometrical shape to prove that shapes are no longer defined in geometry by the outer boundaries but the interior surface as evidence the boundaries no longer exist. Sure, in your delusional mind only. It is sort of like explaining the laws of the United States. If all you do is remove the word opposite from the jurisdictional laws governing the the three branches of government and argue that the three branches of government have equal powers instead of the people having equal rights and instead of the three branches having equal and opposite powers then insurrection becomes the only rule of law with a militarized judiciary, legislation, and executive justifying a Flat Earth instead of a relative three branches and fourth power of the people to provide checks and balances. How to mathematically argue the right to commit the criminal offense of insurrection.
@@lilmissldnlbc NASA gave the measurements for a one dimensional shape, two dimensional shape, and three dimensional shape all under the color of being four dimensional shapes while using nonquatum equations relative to three dimensions and by removing the fourth dimension required to create a quantum geometry equation which would be identified as separate from three dimensional geometry by application of the laws of physics to geometry itself as equal and opposite is the law of physics, not equal.
AN EQUAL REACTION IS NOT THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!
The only fool who fell for this cosmic insurrection was the idiot using a computer to do their work because they do not have the merit of education or skill to do it themselves because that is how binary code is written mathematically if you mapped out the dimensions of the coding.
Honesty is the best policy. Pride
Like Calculus is not useful in the field
It's a string with it head up its behind
It's not dead It's evolved into a loop theory
First
Lol, this is total BS .
String theory is just a toy.
What predictions does string theory make that other theories do not that have been proven to be correct?
Nuclear bomb wasn't proven till it was, I bet we'll find new ways to destroy ourselves with this lol If they've already proven or done anything the military will not let us know. Standard Operating Procedure.
Scientists on tv probably aren't in the loop.