At approx. marker 2:07:00 , Dr. Steve mentions about Adventism having never taught the true gospel, for which I completely agree with him....I only can say how nice it would be if he were to bring us sermon messages of this, now that he is free from the false teaching of SDAism; I would watch/listen to his sermons. I am hungry for, and am certain many others are also, to hear this kind of present Biblical truth! ❤🙏
@@SDAQandA Awesome! Thanks Peter, but not sure where to find them. I did a you tube search and couldn't find anything to come up that is "sermon-related"?🤔
While I certainly agree that the SDA church has never taught the true gospel, I'm afraid that neither has Steve, nor any other prominent SDA or former SDA or any other prominent preacher/teacher/evangelist of any denomination or ilk. If you want to know what the true gospel is: kennethneal.blogspot.com
LOL that's funny. But he's been bedevilled from the word go. I became an Adventist at 16 in the late 80s but I am a reader so I ran into him early and boy the things the church said to ensure I never picked that book up!!
"A false conclusion once arrived at and widely accepted is not easily dislodged; and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously it is held." Georg Cantor, German mathematician, (1845-1918).....this seems to describe the Carrie Johnsons et al being spoken of❤
I was so disgusted reading "I was Canrights secretary" but not surprised. Typical of Adventists to use your misfortunes/failures against you to prove you are in error and they are in truth.
- I highly recommend you read Canrights book ‘adventism renounced’. I’m juts re reading it. And I’m the preface/introduction he talks about the classic adventist default approach to attacking peoples character. And as I read his writing saying that it was happening to him even then, and reading how he was happily married with 4 children and had lived a happy and respected life in the baptist religion I was reminded yet again that he probably loved a post adventist life that actually wasn’t filled with misfortune or failure! And that the fabricated lives to make him appear poor, failed, diminished and wishing he’d never left adventism were all lies. By all accounts he lead a successful, meaningful and prosperous life post adventism! Let’s say Canrights secretary did even meet him and work for him briefly. The whole book is filled with character assassination. And the author, Carrie Johnson, was ‘wheeled’ out at camp meetings etc all over the place to continue the character assassination. I can’t find anywhere where Adventists have actually refuted Canrights claims! And yea. As you wrote that they were wrong to promote his misfortunes and errors I even had a penny dropping moment (because literally 5 minutes ago I was reading the preface to his book) where I realised he didn’t even love a life of misfortune! He lead an abundant life. The only sad thing was his wife died later in life and he had his leg amputated. The leg was well after Carrie Johnson had met him. So let’s say she did meet him and work for him. It would have been at the time his wife had just died. So yea. Maybe he was depressed and forlorn. Who wouldn’t be! But to extrapolate that he was always like that is just shamefully wrong!! He was a good man. An honourable man and lead a wonderful life after leaving adventism. For me, and I don’t say anyone should copy me, I’m so glad I left the sda church. Like Canright. My life has been so much better since doing so. And like he says in his book, he remained friends with those adventist friends that stood by him. Anyway. Thanks for your comment! We’re on the same page!!!
@@SDAQandA Yes, you are absolutely correct, I believe that wholeheartedly. I was born into the SDA Church too and my family are still Adventists. Adventism renounced is actually the first book I read coming out of Adventism. Thank you for the work you do and God bless.
@@SDAQandA The Canwright book has been out of print and very hard to find. I finally just found a “new hardcover.”. Hubby (cradle Catholic not thrilled). I left long ago, 4/5th generation nightmares snuck in the DNA somewhere. The GC General Conference is vitriolic and vicious. Many pastors, ancillary workers were summarily sacked. My friend got fired for having pepperoni pizza for lunch ~ someone might smell it, then what would they think of us?!?!? Never mind a single mom’s income.
What was disgusting about that book? she was secretary of CanRight.she knew him like you or anyone else knew Canright. if she was lying in her book, prove it.because jus your opinion means nothing.
@@c19comandante57 If my opinion didn't matter, you wouldn't be here under my comment. Anyone who uses someone else's misfortunes and/or physical injuries etc. to prove a point or bolster their weak arguments is a vile, disgusting human being and has zero credibility just like Canright's secretary. I repeat that its quite typical of the SDAs to character assassinate when they get exposed for their demonic doctrines.
Even if one decides EGW was not a prophet but instead a spiritual or theological guide for the church, she was dishonest. I don’t like when people say EGW ‘borrowed’ from others writings. That would indicate she asked permission and gave credit to the original author. Instead she actively chose to participated in plagiarism, which is stealing someone’s work and saying it is your own. This is total dishonesty. She knew what she was doing was wrong and still did it for her own momentary gain. Plagiarism is stealing! For a woman who was insistent on keeping the OT laws including the 10 commandments, she actively broke at least one of the 10 commandments. You should not steal. Now according to EGW, if you don’t keep the law and become perfect like Jesus through the law your salvation is not assured. That speaks volumes - do as I say, not as I do. According to what she said, this places her salvation at risk. 🤔 Note: I believe salvation comes through my total acceptance of Jesus’ atonement for my sins at the Cross. Faith plus nothing else.
He(CANRIGHT) expressed high regard for "Elder Butler and all the other leading men. . . . I have no feelings against any of them, excepting Mrs. White. I dislike her very much indeed. . . . But they are good men for all that, and I never shall willingly oppose them. I am a member of the church still and do all I can to help it. But if I were situated differently, I would just as soon join some other church."-D. M. Canright letter, Dec. 8, 1883. (Italics supplied.) end quote. according to Steve daily CANRIGHT loved ELLEN WHITE. according to CANRIGHT HE DISLIKED ELLEN WHITE.
At 41:16- the lie about the peg leg Elllen White's most ridiculous lie? I beg to differ- Ellen White wrote several books worth of ridiculous lies. 📚📚📚📚
First, I want to thank Steve for cleaning out Ellen's closet. It is about time people understand that Ellen White was a flawed human being like the rest of us. I am one who thinks Ellen White believed she was getting messages from God. She at best believed she had the spirit of discernment and was able to tell right from wrong based on her visions and dreams. It was her charismatic background that made her think she had a gift. It is hard to say how much of her visions were based on the influence of other people, but I have to admit that she helped to fashion a message that is unique in the Christian world. Even if Ellen White was completely demon possessed, I cannot understand why the Devil would create books like those in the conflict of the ages series. Second, the critics of Ellen White have been around from day one. There is nothing new about Canright's revelations about Ellen White. I will admit the Ellen White Estate has done a poor job by smearing the critics instead of simply addressing the charges against her. I can forgive her for copying as it seemed to be fairly common practice, but it is hard to defend her claiming she had no outside help. I have been reading Ellen White since I was a child. It wasn't long until I realized that she was fairly inconsistent with her teachings about the law and gospel. It took me a fair amount of research to understand one cannot always take what she was saying at face value. My approach to her writings was to simply take what was useful to me, leave behind those statements that were contradictory or unclear, and to believe nothing that was not consistent with my understanding of Bible teaching. I think what we are fighting against is the "Myth of Ellen White" instead of the real person. It seemed that those closest to her, who knew of her foibles, did not place her on the same category of an Old Testament Prophet. It was the Ellen White Estate that pushed the "Saintly Prophet" campaign to promote buying and selling her books. The Adventist church can exist without Ellen White as a OT prophet. It is widely known that she never discovered a single doctrine. All that is being accomplished by airing her out is to prove what I knew from the 6th Grade, that Ellen White was a human being subject to the same weakness and temptations. But I cannot disregard the value of her writing both to the church and to me as an individual. I have gleaned some insights from her writing--even if highly edited--that I would not have had without reading her books.
Daughter of the devil Ellen White was a narcissist. She was also a liar and a thief. Fanny Bolton and Marian Davis took scribbled manuscripts from Ellen and fashioned books out of the mostly stolen material. You call it borrowing because you are dishonest, and a demonic cultist. Ellen literally called the women her “ bookmakers.” Ellen is the prophetess who gives credibility to the Adventist movement. All cults have an inferiority complex, and Adventists are no different. Cults make outlandish statements about themselves. Daily has a teaching on the many flamboyant declarations Ellen made about herself. Full blown narcissistic behavior syndrome. Your Ellen cheerleader act is disgusting. Says a lot about you heretic. None of it good. There is no Adventism without James and Ellen White. Ellen the trance medium is the proof Adventists are the last days remnant church. Without Ellen Adventism is non existent.
Thanks for your in-depth comment! Really appreciate your thoughts and insights. Hey quick question. Where you say above ‘I can forgive her copying because it seems that it was common place back then’. Or words to that effect. Where can you sight that kind of copying as being common place? Out of interest.
Plagiarizing is theft. Visualizing an angel walking behind you tallying you your sins is mental abuse. No, Ellen & SDA package deal. Just yesterday I was “comments attacked” for saying coffee & donuts was a nice way to meet and get to know new people. I left SDA long ago and they knew it. With a CWB in one hand and a Counsels in Diet & Foods in they came after me - “absolutely unacceptable”. I think it was the Mark Finley Gang. Time to block them. However, they asked why I left (send us an email). Nope. I said it right there. and here. October 22, 1844. That LIE is what started all this💩. A day that should go down in infamy.
Lol I can’t wait until he has visions :) Btw I’d love you to come on my show and be interviewed. But I think I already know and predict you’ll say no. Does that make me a prophet too?!!! :D
CanRight was Crazy,Lunatic. in his words he said that he would NEVER advice no one to leave the sda church.THEY HAVE THE TRUTH.SAID CANRIGHT.imagine that.
Canright was not a Crazy Lunatic. But it is possible he had one Crazy Lunatic moment when he claimed According to you "They have the Truth" But I suspect you just made that up 😊
He(CANRIGHT)clearly stated that his reason for abandoning his ministry was his impaired confidence in the work of Ellen G. White. "I am thoroughly satisfied that the visions are not from God, but are wholly the fruit of her own imagination." "But," he continued, "you can not separate her visions and work from the third message as held by our people."
Here another adventist Scholar analyzing Steve daily book. David Larson,Ethicist: Adventist ethicist David Larson notes this when he qualifies the STEVE DAILY book more as an "ethical condemnation" than a "psychological evaluation,"
He (CANRIGHT) confessed freely that for years he had harbored in his heart bitter feelings toward Mrs. White because of the testimonies he had received from her. Then in the company of a select few he confessed this all to her and begged her forgiveness. ELLEN WHITE FORGIVES CANRIGHT HATE TOWARDS HER.SHE SAID "You(CANRIGHT) then humbled your heart," wrote Ellen White to Canright of this experience, "and upon your knees asked me to forgive you for the things you had said about me and my work." And she reports, "I freely forgave you, for it was not against me. None of these things were against me: I was only a servant bearing the message God gave me."-Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, p. 623.
I would be very upset too if I had been totally bullied and character assassinated by EGW after I tried to leave amicably as Canwright did. She should have apologised to him for her nasty unchristian behaviour toward him.
This interview was time that could be devoted to a better cause! When has hearsay become a basic standard for coming to conclusions on anything. I believe Arthur White over you two any day! Know the truth, believe the truth, accept the truth, live the truth and share ONLY the truth!
I was CanRight secretary. that book is free online to read for anyone.if you are honest read it for yourself.dont trust no sda and EW hater.they have been found to LIE and TWIST ,add.take away from every sda material or EW.
The Ramie Report.anyone read in here ? what you people think about the Catholic Lawyer,expert in COPYRIGHT LAWS who investigated the accusations of plagiarism against Ellen White. RamiK conclusion ? ELLEN WHITE WAS NO PLAGIARIST.
You might be interested in my next interview. We discuss Ramick and how he was just writing what those who had hired him wanted him to say. What are you defending a doomsday cult?
SDA scholars have analyzed all of Steve daily books.according to Steve no sda scholar has analyzed his books.steve daily HAS A AGENDA AGAINST THE SDA,STEVE DAILY WAS FIRED FROM THE SDA. HE IS SO BITTER AGAINST THE SDA CHURCH AND ELLEN WHITE.
So she didn't know him because she spread a rumor about a peg leg?..really it all hangs on the peg leg...pun intended...That's not enough to say she didn't know him.
Yea, I’m hoping there’s more when the book comes out. She may have had a memory lapse and added that bit of info later. Not remembering accurately. I’d love to get this one pegged accurately :D
Dr. Daily did the world a great favor by writing and publishing his EGW exposé, Ellen G. White A Psychobiography, which many of us read wirh great interest and willingness to trust its journalistic integrity. Unfortunately, Dr. Daily revealed his MAGA bona fides at 1:05:07 in this interview. So much for credibility.
Try not to get caught in the fallacy that info is only accurate if you like the person sharing that info. His info on Ellen stands regardless of if you do or don’t agree with his politics. Thanks for your comment. I value people’s participation in these interviews. Thank you!
@@SDAQandA Thanks for the thoughtful reply, Peter. Thanks also for your terrific music. But especially, thanks for this channel and your superb presentation of valuable information every SDA and former SDA should know. (BTW, you may not have seen the comment I posted on your second video of Des Live. When convenient, please check it out.) I read Ellen G. White, a Psychobiography a year or two ago and found it to be excellently researched and written. I also listened carefully to the dialogue between Daily and Tom Norris on your channel. Daily was a class act in the face of Norris's fusillade of ad hominems. Dr. Daily seems to me to be extremely reliable on the subject of Ellen White. My comment above was not intended to challenge Daily's work on Ellen White. That speaks for itself. My comment targeted Dailey's passing reference to, and obvious advocacy of, the right wing propaganda that currently rages in USA. On that subject, I cannot be silent. To borrow a quote from Winston Churchill, "I decline utterly to be impartial between the fire brigade and the fire."
While it's good to discuss these SDA matters to find solutions, I've found in my personal experience it is not good to keep dwelling on negative messages, rather, it is best to move on to positive messages that matter more, such as the Gospel truths.
@@JK-pd7jf - I think the positive take away from today’s discussion was how amazing Canright is/was and how we are setting him free from decades upon decades of false judgement. That’s not dwelling. That’s resolving. Resolution in motion! :) thanks for your comment.
@@SDAQandAyou would be surprised how many SDA’s are not aware of any of this information. The powers that be would love to keep the laity in complete darkness. For too long members have only been told a single story and been told to focus on the “positive”. It’s important to know all sides so that one can make informed decisions about their spiritual path. That’s a positive takeaway.
Thank Peter and Dr. Daily; I really enjoyed this
Steve’s description of Canright made me search for his books and he was an amazing author.
Thanks Pete for this excellent episode. Always great to have Dr. Steve again in your program.
At approx. marker 2:07:00 , Dr. Steve mentions about Adventism having never taught the true gospel, for which I completely agree with him....I only can say how nice it would be if he were to bring us sermon messages of this, now that he is free from the false teaching of SDAism; I would watch/listen to his sermons. I am hungry for, and am certain many others are also, to hear this kind of present Biblical truth! ❤🙏
He has sermons! Lots of them are online.
@@SDAQandA Awesome! Thanks Peter, but not sure where to find them. I did a you tube search and couldn't find anything to come up that is "sermon-related"?🤔
@@lb6110 let me see what I can find for you.
@@SDAQandA ❤
While I certainly agree that the SDA church has never taught the true gospel, I'm afraid that neither has Steve, nor any other prominent SDA or former SDA or any other prominent preacher/teacher/evangelist of any denomination or ilk. If you want to know what the true gospel is: kennethneal.blogspot.com
Just started checking out your content and have already binge watched some episodes, great work!! 👍👍👊👊 Greetings from South America
Go read the book they are talking about .I WAS CANRIGHT SECRETARY.
Is what is funny is that I never heard bad things about Canright until now. I was only told he apostasized.
LOL that's funny. But he's been bedevilled from the word go. I became an Adventist at 16 in the late 80s but I am a reader so I ran into him early and boy the things the church said to ensure I never picked that book up!!
"A false conclusion once arrived at and widely accepted is not easily dislodged; and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously it is held." Georg Cantor, German mathematician, (1845-1918).....this seems to describe the Carrie Johnsons et al being spoken of❤
I was so disgusted reading "I was Canrights secretary" but not surprised. Typical of Adventists to use your misfortunes/failures against you to prove you are in error and they are in truth.
- I highly recommend you read Canrights book ‘adventism renounced’. I’m juts re reading it. And I’m the preface/introduction he talks about the classic adventist default approach to attacking peoples character. And as I read his writing saying that it was happening to him even then, and reading how he was happily married with 4 children and had lived a happy and respected life in the baptist religion I was reminded yet again that he probably loved a post adventist life that actually wasn’t filled with misfortune or failure! And that the fabricated lives to make him appear poor, failed, diminished and wishing he’d never left adventism were all lies. By all accounts he lead a successful, meaningful and prosperous life post adventism! Let’s say Canrights secretary did even meet him and work for him briefly. The whole book is filled with character assassination. And the author, Carrie Johnson, was ‘wheeled’ out at camp meetings etc all over the place to continue the character assassination. I can’t find anywhere where Adventists have actually refuted Canrights claims! And yea. As you wrote that they were wrong to promote his misfortunes and errors I even had a penny dropping moment (because literally 5 minutes ago I was reading the preface to his book) where I realised he didn’t even love a life of misfortune! He lead an abundant life. The only sad thing was his wife died later in life and he had his leg amputated. The leg was well after Carrie Johnson had met him. So let’s say she did meet him and work for him. It would have been at the time his wife had just died. So yea. Maybe he was depressed and forlorn. Who wouldn’t be! But to extrapolate that he was always like that is just shamefully wrong!! He was a good man. An honourable man and lead a wonderful life after leaving adventism. For me, and I don’t say anyone should copy me, I’m so glad I left the sda church. Like Canright. My life has been so much better since doing so. And like he says in his book, he remained friends with those adventist friends that stood by him. Anyway. Thanks for your comment! We’re on the same page!!!
@@SDAQandA Yes, you are absolutely correct, I believe that wholeheartedly. I was born into the SDA Church too and my family are still Adventists. Adventism renounced is actually the first book I read coming out of Adventism. Thank you for the work you do and God bless.
@@SDAQandA The Canwright book has been out of print and very hard to find. I finally just found a “new hardcover.”. Hubby (cradle Catholic not thrilled). I left long ago, 4/5th generation nightmares snuck in the DNA somewhere.
The GC General Conference is vitriolic and vicious. Many pastors, ancillary workers were summarily sacked. My friend got fired for having pepperoni pizza for lunch ~ someone might smell it, then what would they think of us?!?!? Never mind a single mom’s income.
What was disgusting about that book? she was secretary of CanRight.she knew him like you or anyone else knew Canright. if she was lying in her book, prove it.because jus your opinion means nothing.
@@c19comandante57 If my opinion didn't matter, you wouldn't be here under my comment.
Anyone who uses someone else's misfortunes and/or physical injuries etc. to prove a point or bolster their weak arguments is a vile, disgusting human being and has zero credibility just like Canright's secretary.
I repeat that its quite typical of the SDAs to character assassinate when they get exposed for their demonic doctrines.
Even if one decides EGW was not a prophet but instead a spiritual or theological guide for the church, she was dishonest.
I don’t like when people say EGW ‘borrowed’ from others writings. That would indicate she asked permission and gave credit to the original author. Instead she actively chose to participated in plagiarism, which is stealing someone’s work and saying it is your own. This is total dishonesty. She knew what she was doing was wrong and still did it for her own momentary gain.
Plagiarism is stealing! For a woman who was insistent on keeping the OT laws including the 10 commandments, she actively broke at least one of the 10 commandments.
You should not steal.
Now according to EGW, if you don’t keep the law and become perfect like Jesus through the law your salvation is not assured.
That speaks volumes - do as I say, not as I do. According to what she said, this places her salvation at risk. 🤔
Note: I believe salvation comes through my total acceptance of Jesus’ atonement for my sins at the Cross. Faith plus nothing else.
He(CANRIGHT) expressed high regard for "Elder Butler and all the other leading men. . . . I have no feelings against any of them, excepting Mrs. White. I dislike her very much indeed. . . . But they are good men for all that, and I never shall willingly oppose them. I am a member of the church still and do all I can to help it. But if I were situated differently, I would just as soon join some other church."-D. M. Canright letter, Dec. 8, 1883. (Italics supplied.) end quote. according to Steve daily CANRIGHT loved ELLEN WHITE. according to CANRIGHT HE DISLIKED ELLEN WHITE.
Good research...now keep going and you'll find yourself out of SDA as well
At 41:16- the lie about the peg leg Elllen White's most ridiculous lie? I beg to differ- Ellen White wrote several books worth of ridiculous lies. 📚📚📚📚
No Ellen’s lie. But the alleged lie of Carrie Johnson. Author of the book, I was Canrights Secretary.
Oh-so Carrie Johnson said it. Yes, quite ridiculous of her. I've read some of Canright's writings. He seemed pretty rational to me.
@@woebetidethee Very rational and very informative.
✌️🤠
First, I want to thank Steve for cleaning out Ellen's closet. It is about time people understand that Ellen White was a flawed human being like the rest of us.
I am one who thinks Ellen White believed she was getting messages from God. She at best believed she had the spirit of discernment and was able to tell right from wrong based on her visions and dreams. It was her charismatic background that made her think she had a gift. It is hard to say how much of her visions were based on the influence of other people, but I have to admit that she helped to fashion a message that is unique in the Christian world.
Even if Ellen White was completely demon possessed, I cannot understand why the Devil would create books like those in the conflict of the ages series.
Second, the critics of Ellen White have been around from day one. There is nothing new about Canright's revelations about Ellen White. I will admit the Ellen White Estate has done a poor job by smearing the critics instead of simply addressing the charges against her. I can forgive her for copying as it seemed to be fairly common practice, but it is hard to defend her claiming she had no outside help.
I have been reading Ellen White since I was a child. It wasn't long until I realized that she was fairly inconsistent with her teachings about the law and gospel. It took me a fair amount of research to understand one cannot always take what she was saying at face value. My approach to her writings was to simply take what was useful to me, leave behind those statements that were contradictory or unclear, and to believe nothing that was not consistent with my understanding of Bible teaching.
I think what we are fighting against is the "Myth of Ellen White" instead of the real person. It seemed that those closest to her, who knew of her foibles, did not place her on the same category of an Old Testament Prophet. It was the Ellen White Estate that pushed the "Saintly Prophet" campaign to promote buying and selling her books.
The Adventist church can exist without Ellen White as a OT prophet. It is widely known that she never discovered a single doctrine.
All that is being accomplished by airing her out is to prove what I knew from the 6th Grade, that Ellen White was a human being subject to the same weakness and temptations. But I cannot disregard the value of her writing both to the church and to me as an individual. I have gleaned some insights from her writing--even if highly edited--that I would not have had without reading her books.
Daughter of the devil Ellen White was a narcissist. She was also a liar and a thief. Fanny Bolton and Marian Davis took scribbled manuscripts from Ellen and fashioned books out of the mostly stolen material. You call it borrowing because you are dishonest, and a demonic cultist. Ellen literally called the women her “ bookmakers.” Ellen is the prophetess who gives credibility to the Adventist movement. All cults have an inferiority complex, and Adventists are no different. Cults make outlandish statements about themselves. Daily has a teaching on the many flamboyant declarations Ellen made about herself. Full blown narcissistic behavior syndrome. Your Ellen cheerleader act is disgusting. Says a lot about you heretic. None of it good. There is no Adventism without James and Ellen White. Ellen the trance medium is the proof Adventists are the last days remnant church. Without Ellen Adventism is non existent.
Thanks for your in-depth comment! Really appreciate your thoughts and insights. Hey quick question. Where you say above ‘I can forgive her copying because it seems that it was common place back then’. Or words to that effect. Where can you sight that kind of copying as being common place? Out of interest.
@@SDAQandA ruclips.net/video/RnO8BfYqbbg/видео.html
start at 42:00
Plagiarizing is theft.
Visualizing an angel walking behind you tallying you your sins is mental abuse.
No, Ellen & SDA package deal. Just yesterday I was “comments attacked” for saying coffee & donuts was a nice way to meet and get to know new people.
I left SDA long ago and they knew it. With a CWB in one hand and a Counsels in Diet & Foods in they came after me - “absolutely unacceptable”.
I think it was the Mark Finley Gang. Time to block them.
However, they asked why I left (send us an email).
Nope. I said it right there. and here.
October 22, 1844.
That LIE is what started all this💩.
A day that should go down in infamy.
Steve is the new prophet of former adventist ....lol
Lol I can’t wait until he has visions :) Btw I’d love you to come on my show and be interviewed. But I think I already know and predict you’ll say no. Does that make me a prophet too?!!! :D
@@SDAQandA 👍💯
CanRight was Crazy,Lunatic. in his words he said that he would NEVER advice no one to leave the sda church.THEY HAVE THE TRUTH.SAID CANRIGHT.imagine that.
Canright was not a Crazy Lunatic. But it is possible he had one Crazy Lunatic moment when he claimed According to you "They have the Truth"
But I suspect you just made that up 😊
He(CANRIGHT)clearly stated that his reason for abandoning his ministry was his impaired confidence in the work of Ellen G. White. "I am thoroughly satisfied that the visions are not from God, but are wholly the fruit of her own imagination."
"But," he continued, "you can not separate her visions and work from the third message as held by our people."
Here another adventist Scholar analyzing Steve daily book. David Larson,Ethicist: Adventist ethicist David Larson notes this when he qualifies the STEVE DAILY book more as an "ethical condemnation" than a "psychological evaluation,"
Can you ask David Larson if he’s be on my show. I love hearing all sides to a story!
He (CANRIGHT) confessed freely that for years he had harbored in his heart bitter feelings toward Mrs. White because of the testimonies he had received from her. Then in the company of a select few he confessed this all to her and begged her forgiveness.
ELLEN WHITE FORGIVES CANRIGHT HATE TOWARDS HER.SHE SAID "You(CANRIGHT) then humbled your heart," wrote Ellen White to Canright of this experience, "and upon your knees asked me to forgive you for the things you had said about me and my work." And she reports, "I freely forgave you, for it was not against me. None of these things were against me: I was only a servant bearing the message God gave me."-Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, p. 623.
I would be very upset too if I had been totally bullied and character assassinated by EGW after I tried to leave amicably as Canwright did.
She should have apologised to him for her nasty unchristian behaviour toward him.
This interview was time that could be devoted to a better cause! When has hearsay become a basic standard for coming to conclusions on anything. I believe Arthur White over you two any day!
Know the truth, believe the truth, accept the truth, live the truth and share ONLY the truth!
I was CanRight secretary. that book is free online to read for anyone.if you are honest read it for yourself.dont trust no sda and EW hater.they have been found to LIE and TWIST ,add.take away from every sda material or EW.
The Ramie Report.anyone read in here ? what you people think about the Catholic Lawyer,expert in COPYRIGHT LAWS who investigated the accusations of plagiarism against Ellen White. RamiK conclusion ? ELLEN WHITE WAS NO PLAGIARIST.
You might be interested in my next interview. We discuss Ramick and how he was just writing what those who had hired him wanted him to say. What are you defending a doomsday cult?
c 19comandante. Stop Telling Lies. You are not fooling anyone.😕
SDA scholars have analyzed all of Steve daily books.according to Steve no sda scholar has analyzed his books.steve daily HAS A AGENDA AGAINST THE SDA,STEVE DAILY WAS FIRED FROM THE SDA. HE IS SO BITTER AGAINST THE SDA CHURCH AND ELLEN WHITE.
So she didn't know him because she spread a rumor about a peg leg?..really it all hangs on the peg leg...pun intended...That's not enough to say she didn't know him.
Yea, I’m hoping there’s more when the book comes out. She may have had a memory lapse and added that bit of info later. Not remembering accurately. I’d love to get this one pegged accurately :D
@@SDAQandA good one😂
Dr. Daily did the world a great favor by writing and publishing his EGW exposé, Ellen G. White A Psychobiography, which many of us read wirh great interest and willingness to trust its journalistic integrity. Unfortunately, Dr. Daily revealed his MAGA bona fides at 1:05:07 in this interview. So much for credibility.
Try not to get caught in the fallacy that info is only accurate if you like the person sharing that info. His info on Ellen stands regardless of if you do or don’t agree with his politics. Thanks for your comment. I value people’s participation in these interviews. Thank you!
@@SDAQandA Thanks for the thoughtful reply, Peter. Thanks also for your terrific music. But especially, thanks for this channel and your superb presentation of valuable information every SDA and former SDA should know. (BTW, you may not have seen the comment I posted on your second video of Des Live. When convenient, please check it out.)
I read Ellen G. White, a Psychobiography a year or two ago and found it to be excellently researched and written. I also listened carefully to the dialogue between Daily and Tom Norris on your channel. Daily was a class act in the face of Norris's fusillade of ad hominems. Dr. Daily seems to me to be extremely reliable on the subject of Ellen White.
My comment above was not intended to challenge Daily's work on Ellen White. That speaks for itself. My comment targeted Dailey's passing reference to, and obvious advocacy of, the right wing propaganda that currently rages in USA. On that subject, I cannot be silent. To borrow a quote from Winston Churchill, "I decline utterly to be impartial between the fire brigade and the fire."
@@jamesandres6312- Is this the one? I love your Winston C quote! So true!
@@SDAQandA Yes, mon cher ami! Reading these comments after Loma Linda is a very fond memory!
Steve looks tired, worn out, and over talking about the Adventist horror story.
While it's good to discuss these SDA matters to find solutions, I've found in my personal experience it is not good to keep dwelling on negative messages, rather, it is best to move on to positive messages that matter more, such as the Gospel truths.
I think he’s just warming up :)
@@JK-pd7jf - I think the positive take away from today’s discussion was how amazing Canright is/was and how we are setting him free from decades upon decades of false judgement. That’s not dwelling. That’s resolving. Resolution in motion! :) thanks for your comment.
@@SDAQandAyou would be surprised how many SDA’s are not aware of any of this information. The powers that be would love to keep the laity in complete darkness. For too long members have only been told a single story and been told to focus on the “positive”. It’s important to know all sides so that one can make informed decisions about their spiritual path. That’s a positive takeaway.
@@Deconstructionist - thank you. And yes. That why I bang on about it. On and on and on and on lol.