House Robber

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
  • For business inquiries email partnerships@k2.codes My Desk Setup
    Desk - bit.ly/3jfY195
    Chair - amzn.to/2O9TM3r
    Monitor - amzn.to/3rcSHGa
    Webcam - amzn.to/2NUmwgi
    Desktop - amzn.to/3tiySPL
    Laptops - amzn.to/3aRoN3Z
    iPad - amzn.to/2LlJzzJ
    Keyboard - amzn.to/3jfbxdd
    Mouse - amzn.to/36ElWtT
    Wrist Rest - amzn.to/3trrHF4 (pls don't buy this)
    Mouse Pad - amzn.to/2Myz2lt
    Microphone - amzn.to/3atNyTA
    Lamp - amzn.to/3jjfZYp
    Headphones - amzn.to/3tvr0KU (new model)
    Headphone Hook - amzn.to/3tr8uTC
    Blue Light Glasses - amzn.to/3cDVUdK
    Wireless Charger - amzn.to/39LY1uu
    Keyboard cable - amzn.to/2O5p2R5
    Mic arm - amzn.to/3cECZj8
    Audio interface - amzn.to/36HdWIi
    Cloudlifter - amzn.to/36VO6kf
    Laptop dock - amzn.to/2O2DsBw
    Motherboard - amzn.to/3rkiWuA
    Solid state - amzn.to/3rk5vuo
    CPU cooler - amzn.to/3tnwwPA
    CableMod - amzn.to/3tqbtM8
    CPU - amzn.to/3auG1ns
    Power supply - amzn.to/3trsAxo
    RAM - amzn.to/39JZcuf
    Designing Data-Intensive Applications - amzn.to/2YK4ek1
    Clean Code - amzn.to/3txqfB5
    Meditations - amzn.to/3cDa4fi
    SOCIAL
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Support me on Patreon: / kevinnaughtonjr
    Follow me on Twitter: / kevinnaughtonjr
    Follow me on Instagram: / kevinnaughtonjr
    Follow me on GitHub: github.com/kdn251
    MUSIC
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Blushes by Dj Quads
    / blushes
    #coding #interviews #softwareengineering Discord: bit.ly/K2-discord

Комментарии • 188

  • @KevinNaughtonJr
    @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад +122

    HOW DOPE IS MY SKI MASK

    • @jlecampana
      @jlecampana 5 лет назад +1

      Love the Mask! and well, this one is a very nice and do-able DP problem. I was wondering if you could do #276 - Paint Fence? I couldn't do it for the life of me, and it's labelled as "Easy", so maybe I'm missing something and you can enlighten me. Thanks in Advance Kevin!

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад +1

      @@jlecampana Haha thanks and don't pay attention to the labels they're all subjective! I actually think I already have a video on that problem if you wanna check it out! And anytime, thank YOU for your support!!!

    • @jlecampana
      @jlecampana 5 лет назад

      @@KevinNaughtonJr Oh I see it, you have done a video for LeetCode #256 - Paint House, How could I have missed it! I will see if I can actually solve the problem before watching your video. But I do think you should definitely check out #276, I could be wrong but I think it's Harder than most DP regulars. Have a nice day!

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад +1

      @@jlecampana I'll check it out thanks for the suggestion!!!

    • @PrathamMantri
      @PrathamMantri 5 лет назад +1

      Thanks Kevin for the best explanation of DP problem. I could use this example as a start for solving DP problems.

  • @alperozdamar517
    @alperozdamar517 5 лет назад +22

    I saw this question in real interview and be able to do it. Thank you Kevin. :)

  • @aydasu
    @aydasu 5 лет назад +48

    love the dp questions. i feel like i am starting to get it. thanks Kevin!

  • @ahasunos5914
    @ahasunos5914 3 года назад +1

    Kevin, I've been following your tutorials since past couple of weeks. You don't need to doubt why do you have subscribers. Thank you for all the concepts.

  • @priyanshmathur3010
    @priyanshmathur3010 2 года назад

    Bro, all those memes and explanations were lit!! Great Video :D

  • @bingo7137
    @bingo7137 5 лет назад +10

    Purely Awesome! i'm kinda struggling with understanding the dynamic programming problems and this is the best explanation out here. Thank you once again for all your help.

  • @OlsZn
    @OlsZn 4 года назад +1

    I love how you have the perfect camera window to block the previous tries of this question ;)

  • @mkhanyisigamedze4807
    @mkhanyisigamedze4807 5 лет назад +5

    This took me 2 hours and I'm reminded of how understanding key concepts is so efficient. Love your videos

  • @jaidevsingh1009
    @jaidevsingh1009 3 года назад

    The clearest video on this problem, thank you!

  • @jaysaxena185
    @jaysaxena185 3 года назад +1

    Excellent Solution Kevin, cleared the concept of dp, through this explanation. Too Good, short, and on-point.

  • @mohithguptakorangi1766
    @mohithguptakorangi1766 3 года назад +1

    now, that's how you explain "SHIT" in a "BEAUTIFUL" way

  • @hookedbeans
    @hookedbeans 2 года назад

    This is brilliant. Thank you!

  • @selinadu1579
    @selinadu1579 5 лет назад +2

    Awesome solution. Plz plz keep doing these tutorials. Love them!

  • @georgiossamaras5063
    @georgiossamaras5063 3 года назад

    You don't need the if statement for the 2 houses case. Nice explanation, thanks!

  • @killersdeat0
    @killersdeat0 5 лет назад +1

    Great intuition! A lot of people only keep 2 numbers (value if you robbed the house vs value if you didn't) and alternate saving the variables but I think that building the dp table is a lot more intuitive. We can also simplify the space complexity of the solution to be O(1) once we see the concept of building the table out in a real interview scenario

  • @studyaccount794
    @studyaccount794 2 года назад +2

    We can improve this solution even further. We can use 3 variables instead of using a complete new array. Just like we do in fibonacci. Code-
    public int rob(int[] nums) {
    int loot1 = 0;
    int loot2 = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i

  • @svddwd
    @svddwd 4 года назад

    Very nice explanation and approach . Thank you.

  • @ENGCS_JaiSaxena
    @ENGCS_JaiSaxena 2 года назад

    that is unbelivable , how are u able to solve so easily dude.great work.

  • @Slumpicus
    @Slumpicus 5 лет назад +1

    You're killing it, dude. Keep it up!

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад

      Thanks Grayson I really appreciate it and don't worry I'm not going anywhere! New video is uploading now so get ready to check it out. Thanks so much for your support!

  • @ichdiegross
    @ichdiegross 5 лет назад +1

    You did a great job at explaining the concept properly!

  • @wheresthebeach0138
    @wheresthebeach0138 4 года назад +1

    Hey Kevin, thank you for this! IMO, it's your best video to date :) I think you took the perfect amount of time to explain the logic before diving into the code; really clicked for me. Thank you!

  • @objectivesworld31
    @objectivesworld31 5 лет назад +3

    Hi Kevin nice explanation of dp. but we are sequentially processing so there is no need of dp array. if we change logic like this
    int first = nums[0];
    int second = Math.max(nums[0],nums[1]);
    int ans = 0;
    for(int i=2; i

  • @economicriskcapitalmodelpr9849
    @economicriskcapitalmodelpr9849 5 лет назад

    This is my first visit to this channel and it's really impressive.Thanks for sharing your knowledge !! I am going to watch at least one video everyday.

  • @NehaJoshi-x5n
    @NehaJoshi-x5n Год назад

    very intuitive, thanks!

  • @loirobin
    @loirobin 5 лет назад +1

    @Kevin your solution explanation is simple and crystal clear, thanks a lot

  • @jagrutijamba9093
    @jagrutijamba9093 3 года назад +1

    Hi Kevin, nice try. But your alogrithm would not return the correct answer in the following case : [2,1,3,4]. The answer should be 2+4 = 6. As both the locations are non-consecutive and lead to max loot. Hence, I tried solving this problem with recursion instead.

  • @AshishSingh-dn8wb
    @AshishSingh-dn8wb 4 года назад

    We actually don't need to check if nums.length==2 in the beginning. We are taking care of that in the loop itself. Anyway, loved the explanation. Love your videos man!

  • @wakita
    @wakita 5 лет назад +3

    Thanks for doing the dynamic programming problems, I've been trying various difficulty ones for a while, and one of the things thats helped me the most has been watching your Leetcode videos, along with BackToBack SWE and Tushar Roy.
    I did something pretty similar to you in my Javascript solution, but did it in place, modifying the original input array. I think this could also be done in constant space and not modifying the input by using a variable to represent max up to i - 1 and max up to i - 2.
    Javascript solution
    =====
    var rob = function(nums) {
    if (nums.length === 0) return 0;
    if (nums.length === 1) return nums[0];
    for (let i=1; i

  • @alammahtab08
    @alammahtab08 4 года назад +1

    Very well explained. Below is the code in case if someone wants to try out. Both, with the dp[] array and without dp array.
    With dp[] array : O(n) Space
    class Solution {
    public int rob(int[] nums) {
    if(nums == null || nums.length == 0)
    return 0;
    if(nums.length == 1)
    return nums[0];
    if(nums.length == 2)
    return Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);

    int[] dp = new int[nums.length];
    dp[0] = nums[0]; dp[1] = Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);
    for(int i = 2; i < nums.length; i++) {
    dp[i] = Math.max(nums[i] + dp[i-2], dp[i-1]);
    }
    return dp[nums.length-1];
    }
    }
    Without dp[] array : O(1) Space
    class Solution {
    public int rob(int[] nums) {
    if(nums == null || nums.length == 0)
    return 0;
    if(nums.length == 1)
    return nums[0];
    if(nums.length == 2)
    return Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);

    int maxBeforeTwoHouse = nums[0];
    int maxBeforeOneHouse = Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);
    int maxAtI = Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);

    for(int i = 2; i < nums.length; i++) {
    maxAtI = Math.max(maxBeforeTwoHouse+ nums[i] , maxBeforeOneHouse);
    maxBeforeTwoHouse = maxBeforeOneHouse;
    maxBeforeOneHouse = maxAtI;
    }
    return maxAtI;
    }
    }
    github.com/eMahtab/house-robber

  • @vaishnavipamulapati9920
    @vaishnavipamulapati9920 2 года назад

    i was struggling with this problem for a day 😔 but your explanation was very intuitive! thank you!

  • @hyonsoo79
    @hyonsoo79 5 лет назад

    Very easy to understand. Thank you!

  • @AliMehrpour-Volcano
    @AliMehrpour-Volcano 5 лет назад +1

    Crystal clear and neat explanation, good job as always 👍

  • @manulscode
    @manulscode 5 лет назад

    The robber is already sleeping in the background.:D

  • @ChocolateMilkCultLeader
    @ChocolateMilkCultLeader 4 года назад +1

    Bro this one was genius. Hats off for a great solution

  • @SaumyaSharma007
    @SaumyaSharma007 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much Sir 🌟 Awesome explanation out there.
    Huge love and Respect from India 🌟🤗

  • @tirthjayswal9895
    @tirthjayswal9895 4 года назад

    Really Good Explentation

  • @ridhwaans
    @ridhwaans 4 года назад

    the confusing part is how the dp array carries over the largest sum without overlapping sums and maintaining non adjacency

  • @renetchi
    @renetchi 3 года назад +1

    Why do you have subscribers? lollll because you're awesome!

  • @crimsoncad3230
    @crimsoncad3230 4 года назад +2

    This is the 1st dp problem for which I paused the video and got the DP logic on my own.
    This should be the 1st video to watch when you start learning DP.
    Initially I thought of 2 independent loops that calculates the sum of all odd and even plce elements, then take the max out of it.
    But this seems more optimized and useful for new concept.

    • @vaichegodas
      @vaichegodas 4 года назад

      you cant use 2 for loops to solve the problem

    • @shredchic
      @shredchic 4 года назад

      I tried the odd/even thing as well first, but it will miss the max in some cases. Consider [8, 1, 9, 2, 5, 20] With checking odd vs. even, the max would be 23. However, the best robbery is 37. :)

  • @DhruvPatel-kg5ut
    @DhruvPatel-kg5ut 5 лет назад +2

    Awesome bro. This is the 3rd video I saw for this problem and now I actually could figure out the solution. Thanks.

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад

      Anytime Dhruv happy to hear the video was helpful :)

  • @AmolGautam
    @AmolGautam 3 года назад

    Thank you for the explaination.

  • @Dorin-Baba
    @Dorin-Baba 5 лет назад +35

    I think you got a dude moving in the background =)

  • @theanonymousfoodie8906
    @theanonymousfoodie8906 3 года назад +1

    this question was asked in my interview and I'm not able to solve that, now it looks very simple to me. Dammmmm!!!

  • @datajunkie3427
    @datajunkie3427 4 года назад +1

    The question starts with: You are a professional robber planning to rob houses along a street... That's a good start

  • @hitec1691
    @hitec1691 5 лет назад +3

    Nicely explained. Thank you

  • @oneautumnleaf47
    @oneautumnleaf47 4 года назад

    Any referrence for dp? Where can I learn that? They don't teach it at school. lol

  • @kairu86
    @kairu86 4 года назад

    Very helpful. Thanks!

  • @mp0157
    @mp0157 5 лет назад +2

    Thank you Kevin!! Good and simplified explanation! :) This helped!

  • @lazycoder1910
    @lazycoder1910 3 года назад

    The explanation was really amazing

  • @ayanagrawal
    @ayanagrawal 3 года назад +1

    Update : This is in medium now.

  • @humblecoder9119
    @humblecoder9119 5 лет назад +1

    Super explanation. Good to understand DP like this.

  • @mayankdixit401
    @mayankdixit401 4 года назад

    My greatest achievement was that I was able to find that it is a dp problem. Now I can relate to the solution, thanks :)

  • @marlegagaming1274
    @marlegagaming1274 3 года назад

    man, you made it look so easy...

  • @mp0157
    @mp0157 5 лет назад +1

    Very well explained intution! :) Thanks, this was of immense help!

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад +1

      Mihir Phatak thanks Mihir! Happy to hear the video was helpful :)

  • @ecea044gauravgogoi2
    @ecea044gauravgogoi2 3 года назад

    so nicely explained

  • @Matt-xq6ow
    @Matt-xq6ow 3 года назад

    I'm confused by the solution, can someone explain?
    I'm stuck understanding: dp[i] = Math.max(nums[i] + dp[i-2], dp[i-1]);
    Doesn't this mean we possibly have the chance of selecting an adjacent house instead of every other house?

  • @Coolguylht
    @Coolguylht 3 года назад

    I notice that you didn't use length + 1 for dp array this time, but for some other questions like number of coins and decoded ways all used length + 1 may I ask why this is otherwise?

  • @peterdinklage3856
    @peterdinklage3856 4 года назад

    Awesome explanation mate!! thanks a lot!!

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  4 года назад +1

      Swapnil Shukla anytime happy it was helpful!

  • @shubhoch2368
    @shubhoch2368 3 года назад

    Hey, first of all I really like your videos the way you approach a dp problem makes it so soo simple. Thank you! Can you please make a video on Leetcode problem number 152, I just want to know how you will approach that problem in case you have time to do so!

  • @RohanDaDev
    @RohanDaDev 4 года назад

    Okay, im not sure if its this simple or not, but wouldn't the question devolve into checking whether the sum of the even numbered indices is greater than the odd?
    the only possible combos are all the even numbered indices and odd numbered indices. But i don' think its that easy

  • @Plopcorn02
    @Plopcorn02 3 года назад

    Kevin how many years of experienced have you had as a coder for using Java. Im intrested.

  • @saulgoodman980
    @saulgoodman980 4 года назад +2

    My Python solution:
    def rob(nums):
    dp = [0, 0] # having 0s instead of nums[0] and max(nums[:2]) handles cases where len(nums) is 0 or 1 or 2
    for num in nums:
    dp.append(max(dp[-1], num + dp[-2]))
    return dp[-1]

    • @yv6358
      @yv6358 4 года назад

      Oh! Hey when did you start programming?

    • @saulgoodman980
      @saulgoodman980 4 года назад

      @@yv6358 It's been 5 years since I started (in school), but I've become serious only from the last 1.5 years

    • @yv6358
      @yv6358 4 года назад

      @@saulgoodman980 What happened to your career in law?

    • @saulgoodman980
      @saulgoodman980 4 года назад

      @@yv6358 Oh xD
      Well, you'll know in BCS S06 ;)

    • @yv6358
      @yv6358 4 года назад

      @@saulgoodman980 waiting for it

  • @cam5862
    @cam5862 5 лет назад +1

    1. great understandable DP explanation
    2. love your freeze frame gold esp at 1:22 (that's some field theory sh*t I had to learn for cryptography 🤣)
    thanks for your helping me prep for my Google interview next week!

    • @Dorin-Baba
      @Dorin-Baba 5 лет назад

      So, i guess you're a googleer now? :) Hope yes

    • @cam5862
      @cam5862 5 лет назад +1

      @@Dorin-Baba unfortunately not :(
      I'm an Amazonian tho!

  • @vashi1989
    @vashi1989 5 лет назад +1

    simple and nice explanation.. i dont think we need an extra array.. i tried with the provided nums arrays and it worked.

  • @Vikasslytherine
    @Vikasslytherine 5 лет назад

    How to identify if a certain problem's going to need dynamic problem to solve?

  • @seal0118
    @seal0118 4 года назад

    how do results not overlap, is there proof to this?

  • @arpitverma8060
    @arpitverma8060 4 года назад

    Awesome explanation of this question by a bottom up approach ..Can you explain it by a Top down ?

  • @sunittechjourney9640
    @sunittechjourney9640 4 года назад

    What did you do on line 13? int[] dp = new int[nums.length] ? What is that?

  • @AhmadHassan-de9xo
    @AhmadHassan-de9xo 4 года назад

    What if my sack where i put the money has a certain weight, and with each house's money there is a weight bounty i have to take into consideration, how would the program change ?

  • @shubhammishra1225
    @shubhammishra1225 2 года назад

    Now this question become Leetcode medium. Still Dope mask and video.

  • @tavleenkaur6941
    @tavleenkaur6941 5 лет назад

    Hey Kevin, your videos are very insightful and helping alot of people like me prepping up for the interviews.
    One thing I’d like to point in this question is that Is DP even necessary here? The first intuition that hit my mind when I read the question was to take the sum of the entire array (sum) and sum of all the alternate elements beginning from 0 (i.e. element at index 0 ,2, 4, till n-1 or n-2), lets call it X. The answer should be max(X , sum-X).
    Please let me know if there is something wrong in this approach ?

    • @darkcaper703
      @darkcaper703 5 лет назад +1

      [2,1,1,2] -> u need to rob 1st and last to get maximum

  • @atift5465
    @atift5465 5 лет назад

    Ughh this is why I hate DP Problems. They always have a gotcha moment. It either clicks with us or it doesnt. I always had intuition that this was a DP problem before solving it but for some reason went towards the Brute Force and used many edge cases. Its hard to explain what I did and the problem worked for many cases but it failed many other cases. Anyhow, thanks for sharing again Kevin. Great work. Can you explain how you typically come up with solutions or algorithms to DP problems?

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад +1

      That's ok Atif it just takes practice keep working hard! What I normally try and do for dp problems is kinda what I did in this video...I try to think abou the simplest case. So whenever approaching a dp problem (and using bottom-up processing), I try to think about the absolute simplest case and build from there!

    • @atift5465
      @atift5465 5 лет назад

      @@KevinNaughtonJr yea, true. I just need to tackle them more often until I can pick up exactly how to break down each problem into sub-problems. And as you said, it comes easier with practice. As always, thank you so much for this content and for replying.

    • @KevinNaughtonJr
      @KevinNaughtonJr  5 лет назад

      @@atift5465 Definitely, it's all about practice and anytime Atif thanks for your continued support :)

  • @brijeshtiwari1357
    @brijeshtiwari1357 4 года назад

    Can we sort this array first and then start adding non adjacent elements from n-1 ?

    • @christianrascioni8178
      @christianrascioni8178 4 года назад

      If you sort the array first, you lose the original order and don't know what houses are adjacent anymore

  • @ishikanagar3236
    @ishikanagar3236 3 года назад

    loved it!

  • @sandeep-rai07
    @sandeep-rai07 2 года назад

    Awesome explanation

  • @FrankLi92
    @FrankLi92 5 лет назад

    Do we need to create a new array? Can we overwrite the current array for O(1) space?

  • @ayeshaadhikari6123
    @ayeshaadhikari6123 3 года назад

    Thanks a tonne Kevin!

  • @我願榮光歸香港-k5o
    @我願榮光歸香港-k5o 5 лет назад

    Thank you! Really explained my struggles.

  • @rajdipdas9413
    @rajdipdas9413 3 года назад

    this problem can be solved by including first number from first index or excluding first number from first index and continue for the next indices.

  • @PrashantNigam
    @PrashantNigam 5 лет назад

    An improvement over this solution. Same as for Nth Fibonacci number. Without DP array.
    // T/S: O(n)/O(1)
    public int rob(int[] nums) {
    if (nums.length == 0)
    return 0;
    if (nums.length == 1)
    return nums[0];
    int twoBack = nums[0];
    int oneBack = Math.max(nums[0], nums[1]);
    int curr = b;
    for (int i = 2; i < nums.length; i++) {
    curr = Math.max(nums[i] + twoBack, oneBack);
    twoBack = oneBack;
    oneBack = curr;
    }
    return curr;
    }

  • @bhargavlokinindi1895
    @bhargavlokinindi1895 5 лет назад +2

    You are awesome man, Neat & clear, keep it up bro

  • @yicai7
    @yicai7 5 лет назад

    Omg I really like ur bgm at the beginning!!

  • @MyVegeta
    @MyVegeta 4 года назад

    yes i have the same reaction when i understand DB

  • @DanOhCaptainDaniel
    @DanOhCaptainDaniel 5 лет назад +2

    Every time you say "hopefully that's not too confusing" makes me start to assume the explanation you are about to make is going to be confusing haha. I really enjoy your videos, but I think the way you explain for some reason, it does not click for me. Maybe leetcode is still a little too complex for my programming level... I may just have to spend more time looking at the problems myself. Either way, thank you for having the solutions. I hope you answer every leetcode problem so we all have a reference solution for all the leetcode problems! Thank you again.

  • @mostlyharmless161
    @mostlyharmless161 3 года назад

    Epic thumbnail btw xD

  • @HarinathSrinivas
    @HarinathSrinivas 5 лет назад

    Hey, the question you have solved is, "maximum sum in an array such that no 2 elements are adjacent". I was asked this question in an interview, tell me how to solve this.
    Given an array and an int value K, find Maximum sum of numbers, such that no 2 elements are adjacent and sum not greater than K.

  • @ashmin3636
    @ashmin3636 5 лет назад

    Good stuff, blud!

  • @masoomraza5155
    @masoomraza5155 3 года назад

    Thank you
    you are a life saver

  • @vkRonaldo97
    @vkRonaldo97 2 года назад

    can someone explain how this works with [4,1,1,4]

  • @eastercat
    @eastercat 5 лет назад

    Clear and concise. but if possible, can you draw out an example and follow through with your code next time?

  • @AjaySakarwal
    @AjaySakarwal 3 года назад

    For smaller number of houses, another approach which is more straight forward is this:
    1. Get the list of indexes i.e. if there are m houses, list -> [0, 1, 2, ..., m]
    2. Find all possible combinations of of the above list i.e. for [1, 2, 3] -> (1), (2), (3), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3), (1, 2, 3)
    3. From above combinations, remove all the combinations which have at least two consecutive numbers i.e. from above we remove (1, 2), (2, 3) and (1, 2, 3)
    4. For remaining combinations, find the money you'll get by robbing corresponding houses and store them in a list
    5. return the maximum money robbed from above list.

  • @anurag1908
    @anurag1908 3 года назад

    Just WOW!!!

  • @CoolnesXcore
    @CoolnesXcore 4 года назад

    If you want to save some extra space, we can just add the elements to the nums array. :)

  • @tomiwaolasoko7291
    @tomiwaolasoko7291 5 лет назад

    Thanks, great solution!

  • @nivedhapadmanabhan1794
    @nivedhapadmanabhan1794 5 лет назад

    how does the 1st 3 condition making a diff, can we not directly start by setting dp[0] and dp[1]

    • @shrutee11
      @shrutee11 5 лет назад +1

      The first three conditions are called as base conditions where only those situations will hold true.
      As Kevin has coded, nums has either 0,1 or 2 houses.
      If your nums is having more than 2 houses, we're gonna use a dynamic programming array and save the intermediate house value at each step. So, we would have to start again from 0, 1, and so on.
      Hope this helps!

    • @shilpaas2433
      @shilpaas2433 4 года назад

      It works without those base cases because we anyway have the values saved in the dp array. I was also wondering what made this dynamic programming problem different from the others I've seen from Kevin.

  • @ankurgupta4696
    @ankurgupta4696 4 года назад

    Nice Explanation:)

  • @wenzhongtan1358
    @wenzhongtan1358 4 года назад

    Great explanation! Just a question, we could probably shorten the last line to from dp[nums.length - 1] to dp[-1], right?

  • @heeseung5
    @heeseung5 5 лет назад +4

    Nice mask haha made me laugh

  • @GURUYATHI
    @GURUYATHI 5 лет назад

    Great Solution..!

  • @aashkas
    @aashkas 5 лет назад

    Wow finally a good explanation