I have purchased a few of these from you guys and I like them a lot. They work well and are easy to acquire targets. Maybe it's just me, but they work the nuts.
Fun fact: the open aperture, which I was taught to call it the “Oh-2” is actually a “0-2” meaning 0 - 200 and also functions as the night aperture. Ideally, you’d zero the sights with the peep-sight (using whatever zero distance you use but I think they were designed for either a 50/200 or 36/300 yd) and then that aperture would be used for faster sighting inside of 200 (yds or meters, can’t remember but probably yds) and the small aperture would be for everything after that. I’d have to dig the TM again.
Military: tells you not to use the thing it’s intended for cause they think you’re lazy. Actuality: ends up breaking something cause you didn’t use the thing it was intended for. VA: your injuries aren’t service related.
The large aperture is for low light, not 200 yards or less. The small aperture is much more accurate at 0-300 yards where iron sights for qualifications are mandatory. I never had the privilege of using a red dot or optics, or trigicon. They did not exist back in the eighties when I first became a firearm's instructor. The whole large aperture for 200 yards or less is totally busted. Try qualifying on a 300 meter target with the large aperture vs the small aperture and see how your grouping is. Just my professional opinion.
![[Overview] Tactical Assault Panel Kit Bundles](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fMTppr8MbsI/mqdefault.jpg)
I have purchased a few of these from you guys and I like them a lot. They work well and are easy to acquire targets. Maybe it's just me, but they work the nuts.
Fun fact: the open aperture, which I was taught to call it the “Oh-2” is actually a “0-2” meaning 0 - 200 and also functions as the night aperture. Ideally, you’d zero the sights with the peep-sight (using whatever zero distance you use but I think they were designed for either a 50/200 or 36/300 yd) and then that aperture would be used for faster sighting inside of 200 (yds or meters, can’t remember but probably yds) and the small aperture would be for everything after that. I’d have to dig the TM again.
What size battery do these use? lol, jk. I had an M16A2 in Iraq, before the CompM4 and ACOG became fashionable.
Same ones the chemlights take!
I'm pretty sure the gooseneck won't fit on the detachable carry handle. I have the aimpoint model and it only mounts on the integrated models
Are you getting more of them? You are all out.
We will eventually, just unsure of restock timeline
Military: tells you not to use the thing it’s intended for cause they think you’re lazy.
Actuality: ends up breaking something cause you didn’t use the thing it was intended for.
VA: your injuries aren’t service related.
Always has been.
Night sight=big circle. Day sight= little circle. Semper Fi 🇺🇲
The large aperture is for low light, not 200 yards or less. The small aperture is much more accurate at 0-300 yards where iron sights for qualifications are mandatory. I never had the privilege of using a red dot or optics, or trigicon. They did not exist back in the eighties when I first became a firearm's instructor. The whole large aperture for 200 yards or less is totally busted. Try qualifying on a 300 meter target with the large aperture vs the small aperture and see how your grouping is. Just my professional opinion.