This is a great game, and less imposing than the video implies. Thanks for coverage, but perhaps 2 vids next time? Seeing the mechanics in action would prove helpful, and multiplayer is worth separating. Keep up the excellent work!
This game will crash and burn. Bringing out a TCG when magic exists is a death sentence unless you are really something special, which this is not. If L5R couldnt survive in TCG form, no fuckin way this does.
Yugioh, cardfight vanguard and Weiss Schwartz are doing well. They don't need to obtain a large segment of the consumerbase and often players play multiple tcgs anyways.
yes and it's designed to look like Hearthstone. While they are casting a bigger net with this approach, I can't see this surviving long because games like MTG and Yugioh have cornered the market of people who can afford to money dump into these games. Force of Will is struggling and Legend of the 5 Rings died. TCGs are just not great business.
So....red and green are broken got it.Seriously its not a bad game its unique(given i played MTG, Yugioh and Pokemon) so it has staying power at least and the fact it has an app. however i don't know about accessibility, it seems easy but its going against 4 big shots now: Force of Will, MTG, Pokemon, and Yugioh. Kaijudo duel masters and chaotic were snuffed out and vanguard can't say on much of it. However the reason why i said red and green are broken just due to the fact Green has a lot of staying power (ie heals) and red is pure attack(red burns everything decks)
I am so glad you do these videos to help understand how to play the games. But this game has too much info! I was interested in this game but just hearing the amount of things to remmeber on a card and what does what makes me less interested in it.
Fear not! Whilst it may sound complex Lightseekers is designed to help you pick up and learn to play really quickly. Most players can master the basics in a game or two. The game is easy to learn but with lots of strategy and tactical possibilities to master for the experienced player.
Love what you guys normally do, and understand that sponsorship happens to keep things running, but a trading card game? Nope. Money pits, even ones with lots of accessories, are still money pits.
any board game that isn't monoply or life or sorry is a money pit dude just due to expansions. Trading card games tend to pay for themselves after a while cause when you pull a card that is worth 90 to 700 bucks(depending on the game) it usually pays for a deck or booster box.
OsamuWu42 absolutely agree; expandable board game, by their nature, are money pits. However, TCGs and CCGs hold a special spot akin to the pseudo-gambling issues currently being faced by video game loot boxes. Personally, since Fantasy Flight have released their LCG model, I feel TCGs and CCGs have become more outdated and need to die out, and it always saddens me to see new games being released following this model.
The board games are fully playable without any expansions. The thing about CCG:s are that they are pay to win, as each player have to invest money to randomly try to improve their chance of winning. And those extra money for the rare cards require that someone is prepared to pay for a card that will make them beat you every time. With a board game, if I have the game I can play with different people at different times with no issues.
If the game isn't MTG, Yu-Gi-Oh, or Pokemon then it's going to die out. Not because of the type of game it is, but because it sucks ass in comparison to what's already been on the market for 10+ years.
Depends on the board game. yes some can be played without the expansions however if you end up buying some that require the base set of the board game. And no. not always if i can beat a 600 dollar deck that has cards that cost 50 to 60 with a deck that literally cost me 60 bucks? there is no such thing as "he has this rare card thats why he won" thats a bs argument. you can do that in pokemon mtg and yugioh.
I don't understand why the game doesn't trust it's players to pick their targets or why they built in a mechanic that makes it easier to win when you're already winning? These seem like HORRIBLE design choices.
Jenny Cranston this structure reduces tendency to gang up on one individual, ensuring balance. I agree it's a bit unusual, but Lightseekers games are very fast and relentless, and require a certain flow. The multiplayer design concept is a sound one IMO.
But multiplayer formats are self-balancing based on the ability of other players to check the player in the strongest board state. With this kind of set up, if the player to my right has the strongest position, there is nothing I can do to check that besides not attacking to the left in hopes that it will encourage them to put more resources into stopping a snowball victory.
Jenny I had my first multi-player game of Lightseekers. I discovered tonight that aside from your card mentioning Target, you can attack whomever you want in the match! So thankfully, LS is not limited or holding the problems that we discussed. Hope you give it a go -- we had a really fun time. Cheers.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Becca is my favourite geek and sundry member, I love this series.
This is a great game, and less imposing than the video implies. Thanks for coverage, but perhaps 2 vids next time? Seeing the mechanics in action would prove helpful, and multiplayer is worth separating. Keep up the excellent work!
I just noticed that the editors update the number of players (in the how to play animation) when the sub count goes up!
Good mechanic. Good overview. Nice dex work, Becca!
Me: this is an easy game that even beginners can master.
This video: hold my beer
Can you do TerraFyte next?
what as happen to tabletop? is it gone for good?
yes
I just watch these to see Becca Scott being literally my dream woman in different cute outfits.
Not even going to lie, totally Shameless about it.
Large small my building is about 9890 ft by 7890 ft and 7 basements as so and 6 floors at most
Sounds interesting. I might try it
Y'all forgot to post the Game the Game of Outbreak Undead
What witchcraft did you use to create the perfect woman?
But where's Outbreak Undead Game the Game from last week?
JOJO! THIS IS THE LAST OF MY LIGHTSEEKERS DECK. TAKE IIIIIT!!!!
This card game reminds me of chaotic •~•
Ip im mix inflatable op like karabayashi tenjou tenge
Love this game
Becca!
I love you becca
In op im shrink looks large
*This reminds me of Vampire: The Eternal Struggle.*
Brettbren except Lightseekers opted to leave out the cool factor of Jyhad/VtES.
*Along that subject, who is your favorite clan from VTM? Mine would be Ventrue.*
Brettbren I liked the Toreador for VtM but I always only played Ventrue combo decks in VtES.
I'm greatly sceptical of astrology
This game will crash and burn. Bringing out a TCG when magic exists is a death sentence unless you are really something special, which this is not. If L5R couldnt survive in TCG form, no fuckin way this does.
Debrief rest in peace L5R ccg
Yugioh, cardfight vanguard and Weiss Schwartz are doing well.
They don't need to obtain a large segment of the consumerbase and often players play multiple tcgs anyways.
It seems to be a Magic clone, albeit a bad one.
Yep, game was dead before it even launched. It's nothing more than a mash-up of Yu-Gi-Oh, WoW TCG, and MTG... and it's not a very good one either.
DBS ccg still exists. And it's growing.
So... this is just a mash-up of MTG, the WoW TCG, and Yu-Gi-Oh.
yes and it's designed to look like Hearthstone. While they are casting a bigger net with this approach, I can't see this surviving long because games like MTG and Yugioh have cornered the market of people who can afford to money dump into these games. Force of Will is struggling and Legend of the 5 Rings died. TCGs are just not great business.
Its collapses if too large i went to school op
My op game buildins villages are micro im mix hybrid its easier for me to build that detail
Or 190 at most
So....red and green are broken got it.Seriously its not a bad game its unique(given i played MTG, Yugioh and Pokemon) so it has staying power at least and the fact it has an app. however i don't know about accessibility, it seems easy but its going against 4 big shots now: Force of Will, MTG, Pokemon, and Yugioh. Kaijudo duel masters and chaotic were snuffed out and vanguard can't say on much of it. However the reason why i said red and green are broken just due to the fact Green has a lot of staying power (ie heals) and red is pure attack(red burns everything decks)
Start up in lo a 9
Cool
I am so glad you do these videos to help understand how to play the games. But this game has too much info! I was interested in this game but just hearing the amount of things to remmeber on a card and what does what makes me less interested in it.
Fear not! Whilst it may sound complex Lightseekers is designed to help you pick up and learn to play really quickly. Most players can master the basics in a game or two. The game is easy to learn but with lots of strategy and tactical possibilities to master for the experienced player.
Love what you guys normally do, and understand that sponsorship happens to keep things running, but a trading card game? Nope. Money pits, even ones with lots of accessories, are still money pits.
any board game that isn't monoply or life or sorry is a money pit dude just due to expansions. Trading card games tend to pay for themselves after a while cause when you pull a card that is worth 90 to 700 bucks(depending on the game) it usually pays for a deck or booster box.
OsamuWu42 absolutely agree; expandable board game, by their nature, are money pits. However, TCGs and CCGs hold a special spot akin to the pseudo-gambling issues currently being faced by video game loot boxes.
Personally, since Fantasy Flight have released their LCG model, I feel TCGs and CCGs have become more outdated and need to die out, and it always saddens me to see new games being released following this model.
The board games are fully playable without any expansions.
The thing about CCG:s are that they are pay to win, as each player have to invest money to randomly try to improve their chance of winning.
And those extra money for the rare cards require that someone is prepared to pay for a card that will make them beat you every time.
With a board game, if I have the game I can play with different people at different times with no issues.
If the game isn't MTG, Yu-Gi-Oh, or Pokemon then it's going to die out. Not because of the type of game it is, but because it sucks ass in comparison to what's already been on the market for 10+ years.
Depends on the board game. yes some can be played without the expansions however if you end up buying some that require the base set of the board game. And no. not always if i can beat a 600 dollar deck that has cards that cost 50 to 60 with a deck that literally cost me 60 bucks? there is no such thing as "he has this rare card thats why he won" thats a bs argument. you can do that in pokemon mtg and yugioh.
Gimme dat sweet sweet cringe
I don't understand why the game doesn't trust it's players to pick their targets or why they built in a mechanic that makes it easier to win when you're already winning? These seem like HORRIBLE design choices.
Jenny Cranston this structure reduces tendency to gang up on one individual, ensuring balance. I agree it's a bit unusual, but Lightseekers games are very fast and relentless, and require a certain flow. The multiplayer design concept is a sound one IMO.
But multiplayer formats are self-balancing based on the ability of other players to check the player in the strongest board state. With this kind of set up, if the player to my right has the strongest position, there is nothing I can do to check that besides not attacking to the left in hopes that it will encourage them to put more resources into stopping a snowball victory.
Jenny I had my first multi-player game of Lightseekers. I discovered tonight that aside from your card mentioning Target, you can attack whomever you want in the match! So thankfully, LS is not limited or holding the problems that we discussed. Hope you give it a go -- we had a really fun time. Cheers.
Tell them my architecture is small im inflatable it takes years to build big
Artifact should have been somthing like this. NOT WHAT IT IS NOW.
Do people actually play this card game? Never seen anyone buying cards for it or playing it
casey roggow they do at my lgs but it’s not very popular
In op bay
team four star did a better video for this, last YEAR.
Ip Villages ip 98 acres
Can she teach me how to stretch this thing in my jeans?
Start me up in lo phad embler in bo sendfeedback on brief op lo a
i clicked...im leaving now. k thxs bai
try hard much lool
1st comment
and by the way this games looks awesome expecting it on game the game
Joshzwa Revilla Seems kinda complex?
It may sound complex at first glance but you can pick up the mechanics really quickly after a game or two :)
being first in the comment section is like coming in 4th at the special olympics, so, yea.
This channel is such a disappointment considering how good it originally was. Now it's just board game advertisements over and over....