For decades, 62 was the only model Yamaha made, and it was good enough for everything. During the same time, Selmer also had just one model, and it was good enough for everything. Now every sax company has pointless multiple models.
@@zvonimirtosic6171 have you ever played a purple logo 32 or 21 from the '80/'90? They are GREAT no-frill pro instruments, definitely better than modern 62...
As with most RUclips comparison videos, sounds the same to me. Or at least the difference is negligible. Obviously feel is a very big thing we can’t experience just listening. This isn’t the first time I’ve heard reviewers describe the 62 as more a blank canvas, which is appealing. Price point is more appealing, too.
I played a 62 tenor for 6 months, but, from the first notes I played on the 82II, it just seemed to have a more complex tone. It took me a few months of daily playing to make the horn "mine", but I've had it for 6 years now and haven't regretted trading up. (And it goes longer between repair/tune-ups than the 62.)
I have a yts 82z with a V1 neck and also had a selmer sa802. The 82z runs circles around the selmer. It is way easier to blow and quicker with response. Altissimo is also way easier and less resistant. Ended up selling the selmer 😅
My issue with the 82Z is that it is geared towards jazz and pop and too free blowing. YTS-62 is balanced all around. The Selmer Mark VI is just that balanced all around that is why it is such a great horn. But yeah if you want to get a more expensive horn, I think it's better to get the YTS-875. If you can find the first Gen that is even better, because that was like an improvement over the purple logo. The player could have pushed the horns more, to show what they can do. A little breathy perhaps. Yeah -- he liked the 62 more and I don't blame him. NOW why I am not so much in favor with a horn that's gear towards jazz, even though I play jazz - I think a neutral horn which classical players can also use is more malleable as well and the players sound comes through more.
I dunno, the 62 sounded brighter to me, but more focused. The 82z was a bit darker, but bigger sound, imho. You sounded great on both. That sax has more variety in finishes. A matter of preference, really. If I were to buy a new tenor, I'd be happy with the 62. I'd probably get it in either Silver Plated (like my current YAS-62III) or Amber. Those look gorgeous.
Not sure about your comment about 82z more for experienced players. I'm just an amateur jazz player, not even college level. I play-tested both the 62 and 82z a decade ago, felt a huge difference and proceeded to select and purchase the 82z. If anything the customz was tons easier to play and sound. I guess it did play bright, so i did swap my ligature to darken the tone. But that was it. I've gigged a bunch and audiences generally loved the playing. So.. yeah, I don't see what's so difficult about playing the customz at all. Love it.
I play the YTS 62 since 1994. It's awesome.
For decades, 62 was the only model Yamaha made, and it was good enough for everything. During the same time, Selmer also had just one model, and it was good enough for everything.
Now every sax company has pointless multiple models.
Not true. Back then Yamaha already had three product lines: 62, 32 and 23, respectively professional, intermediate and student.
@@francescoguzzetta The only professional model. 23 was a toy.
@@zvonimirtosic6171 have you ever played a purple logo 32 or 21 from the '80/'90? They are GREAT no-frill pro instruments, definitely better than modern 62...
Should I buy a Yanagisawa TwO30 or the YTS-82Z?
As with most RUclips comparison videos, sounds the same to me. Or at least the difference is negligible. Obviously feel is a very big thing we can’t experience just listening. This isn’t the first time I’ve heard reviewers describe the 62 as more a blank canvas, which is appealing. Price point is more appealing, too.
Also have a Purple Logo, with a V1 gold laquered and a silver plated G1 Neck, Sounds awesome🤩
I played a 62 tenor for 6 months, but, from the first notes I played on the 82II, it just seemed to have a more complex tone. It took me a few months of daily playing to make the horn "mine", but I've had it for 6 years now and haven't regretted trading up. (And it goes longer between repair/tune-ups than the 62.)
I have a yts 82z with a V1 neck and also had a selmer sa802. The 82z runs circles around the selmer. It is way easier to blow and quicker with response. Altissimo is also way easier and less resistant. Ended up selling the selmer 😅
Yts 62s purple logo’ so good
82 II nd version what is the diffrence
My issue with the 82Z is that it is geared towards jazz and pop and too free blowing. YTS-62 is balanced all around. The Selmer Mark VI is just that balanced all around that is why it is such a great horn. But yeah if you want to get a more expensive horn, I think it's better to get the YTS-875. If you can find the first Gen that is even better, because that was like an improvement over the purple logo. The player could have pushed the horns more, to show what they can do. A little breathy perhaps. Yeah -- he liked the 62 more and I don't blame him. NOW why I am not so much in favor with a horn that's gear towards jazz, even though I play jazz - I think a neutral horn which classical players can also use is more malleable as well and the players sound comes through more.
What mouthpiece did you say you used?
I dunno, the 62 sounded brighter to me, but more focused. The 82z was a bit darker, but bigger sound, imho. You sounded great on both. That sax has more variety in finishes. A matter of preference, really. If I were to buy a new tenor, I'd be happy with the 62. I'd probably get it in either Silver Plated (like my current YAS-62III) or Amber. Those look gorgeous.
got amber
@MMAandBoxingEnjoyer Nice!!!! I'm jealous! 😄
See your points, but sticking to my 62, BTW, even w/o purple logo it is great.
Just get a purple logo 62 it plays just as good as an 82Z
YES!
Not sure about your comment about 82z more for experienced players. I'm just an amateur jazz player, not even college level. I play-tested both the 62 and 82z a decade ago, felt a huge difference and proceeded to select and purchase the 82z. If anything the customz was tons easier to play and sound. I guess it did play bright, so i did swap my ligature to darken the tone. But that was it. I've gigged a bunch and audiences generally loved the playing. So.. yeah, I don't see what's so difficult about playing the customz at all. Love it.
82 Z . So versatile. My horn for last 10 plus years.
I have a 62 02, european name. With a Meyer HR mpc and a filed 2.5 reed you forgot to go to sleep !
62!
Is 62 is enough for a professional playing? I mean classical and jazz .
Without a doubt, it's a very solid horn with loads of qualities that any pro player would want.