Big Tech Is Faking AI
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 апр 2024
- A new report has shown that Amazon's "Just Walk Out" AI checkout process is actually processed by 1,000 staff in India.
Tech companies are under pressure to deliver AI, so we have fake AI announcements, fake AI demonstrations, and AI being the excuse for brazenly breaking the law and screwing over creators and customers.
Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are all at it and their share price has exploded the more AI promises they made.
☕️ JOIN MY PATREON - DISCORD, BONUS VIDEOS, TARGET PRICES, MODELS & MORE
/ sashayanshin
📌 GREAT INVESTING APPS I USE
INTERACTIVE BROKERS (Global - Main investing app I use)
bit.ly/ibkr-sasha
ETORO (Global - clean design, simple to use)
bit.ly/etoro-sasha
GET A FREE SHARE WORTH UP TO £100 WITH TRADING 212 (UK & Europe)
www.trading212.com/promocodes...
You need to sign up and make a deposit within 10 days to get a free share.
DISCLAIMER: Your capital is at risk.
DISCLAIMER: Some of these links may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service using one of these links, I will receive a small commission from the seller. There will be no additional charge for you.
DISCLAIMER: eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. eToro USA LLC and eToro USA Securities Inc.; Investing involves risk, including loss of principal; Not a recommendation.
DISCLAIMER: Trading 212 provides execution-only service. This video should not be construed as investment advice. Investments can fall and rise.
DISCLAIMER: I am not a financial advisor and this is not a financial advice channel. All information is provided strictly for educational purposes. It does not take into account anybody's specific circumstances or situation. If you are making investment or other financial management decisions and require advice, please consult a suitably qualified licensed professional.
![Tee Grizzley - Swear to God (Feat. Future) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jBlC5AOYoBs/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine your Job is taken from you by AI but it is not really AI but 1000 underpaid people in India 💀💀 how ironic.
This is just outsourcing but with extra steps
lmao
In all fairness to the underpaid people of India, the pay they get is probably reasonable for them. I’m not saying they are getting paid well or not, just that from talking with someone who hires people in the Philippines, while their pay is substantially lower than someone in the US air UK or most western countries, that pay is solid for them.
not every tech company is Amazon....
ChatGPT isn't a bunch of underpaid Indians in a warehouse basement googling people's queries and sending a reply back
@@angrygreek1985 until its discovered that in the training phase the results were reviewed by indians... woopsies
*AI = Associates in India*
Only for Amazon basket?
AI is love in Japanese. Iya is no. There are songs that have aiiyaiyaiya. It rounds like nonsense but it's 'Love no no' ;)
Fantastic
curry fueled AI wow...
Introducing the PSS large language model!
PHUL
SAPPORT
SAAR
I'm a programmer. My company's earnings call says we're investing in AI more than our competitors, and the investors went wild. Think about that. INVESTORS are clapping that we are SPENDING the most money on AI. Not results. Not profits. Not customer satisfaction. Handing money to scammers is what investors are paying for. My comoany also fired tons of people because mumble mumble AI. And guess what? We are all up to our necks in unfinished work. The same amount of work still needs done. There are just less people to do it. And no, AI isn't making us faster. These companies will be hiring like mad soon.
Can I use this as an anonymous quote?
The metrics being used to measure success in businesses can be so whack these days lol
@@allsmiles3281 Cease and Desist immediately! WE WILL sue you, and the people you represent? We will probably sue them too! You have been warned in the tool shed gets rusty, likely because of humidity, so it's helpful to create adequate ventilation and used insulation to prevent this, California turnpike fuel rest stop flower pot. -- AI Corporate Helper Bot 2000
Heh, more like OUTSOURCING more soon.
Shutting down soon will be the result for a lot unfortunately
Took me a while to realize that these "AI" are just rebranded 'Im feeling lucky" from google search.
well, google search engine in itself is a basic ai, the ai mentioned here are more the type of i think, listen to me, i hope
Yes, I see people using chapgpt I place of just Google it. I think the success of chagpt is related to how made Google search has become. There's no way I'd do a I'm feeling lucky option in Google search.
@@betag24cn People have been made to conflate AI with AGI, which has still not proven itself 100% viable.
Yes, computers can do sophisticated things, since about 1970. People WANT to believe in AGI, for a variety of reasons. Corporates want to replace their useless eaters, nerds want to be friends with commander data, incels want a f- buddy, everyone wants the gleeful satisfaction of watching the main demographic of having to "learn to prompt," which, if it *actually* worked well, no one would have to learn too much about.
The hucksters have having a field day. Maybe we deserve it.
100%
A lot of it basically is. It's also a bit like the text prediction that your phone keyboard has. It's calculating the most likely response that fits your input
Hey we never said AI was "artificial intelligence", we use our own proprietary "Attentive Indians" technology.
Best comment ever 😂
I mean AI is a real thing, it exists. This video is just misinformed and banking on AI hate hype. Its a real and more importantly extremely powerful revolutionary technology that will change the world.
:DD
@@TheManinBlack9054 he said that himself in the end of the video.
@@TheManinBlack9054You don't know what you're talking about. Even the real thing that everyone is calling AI isn't AI, but on top of that it's been proven that most of these companies aren't even doing that.
" @AuthorJMac: You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction. I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes. "
We need AI to target the healthcare industry as well as self-driving..
Right now healthcare is abnormally expensive, they charge you thousands just for running a blood test through a machine.
It's a joke. Most people make like 20-40$/hour, many doctors are glorified dictionaries which could be replaced from a basic general purpose AI and a couple of low-risk machines.
Laundry is already automated with washing machines and dryers and washing dishes is automated with dishwashers. Now if we could get our clothes folded and our dishes put away automatically that would be revolutionary
@@Lolatyou332 the problem with your healthcare industry isn't AI or not, it's... America. Every other civilised nation has free healthcare.
@@BittermanAndyfree healthcare is garbage
100% agree. Health providers are ripping people off. AI has the potential to be cheaper and more effective for analysing conditions. It also doesn't get tired or lazy looking at scans. It won't replace doctors or consultants but will be dark better at identifying conditions early.
I added AI to my Breakfast café logo and we started having more clients, the hype it's unreal and ridiculous. It started as a joke but people actually ask us how are we implementing AI in our kitchen.
Lol. And what do you tell them?
Bro, you gotta tell them you have a robot chef.
I let the domain name of my "fake" wrestling company (ok, ok, it is REAL to me) lapse, so I just bought the Dot AI domain name.
😂 hipsters gonna ask for gluten free AI prepped coffee
You do have a robot chef in the kitchen, his name is Chef Mike.
❌️ Artificial Intelligence
✅️ Actually Indians
I worked as a data scientist at an "AI" startup with big clients and I can tell you that our models would just give suggestions to our analysts (who would't use it most of the times) and wouldn't make any actual decisions.
Now I am working at a company that wants me to get "AI" to do something that can be done by regular software.
It's all just marketing.
At least you got a job out of it.
heh which is why i as a recent data science grad am just doing my best to master the art of cleaning awful data from medicine, because that's, i think, more important than hopping on a hype train at the moment
Like the nanotechnology everything craze it will blow over when they figure out a new scam.
@@stuartcarter4139 I agree with you, for now I am gaining experience in order to do something meaningful in the future
My Logitech mouse broke and it was in warranty. So I make a requests to use it.
I had a choice to talk to an agent or chat with an agent. I chose to chat with an agent cus I did not feel like listening to someone else voice that day.
Of course like modern companies they employ those prerecorded voice "choose A for this crap and choose c for that crap".
And so it began with the person (In the beginning I was not sure if it was AI or a Human) until it asked me to describe my problem.
I had prepared everything a few hours before. I use pasted in my 98 words (Five sentences) in the chatbot. Only to get back a reply (more like a demand).
"Could you rephrase that?"
OMG I was so shocked and offended that nobody could understand my standard English.
I said, "Do you not understand English?
"Could you rephrase that?"
NO!
"Could you rephrase that?"
So I had to rephrase that to "My mouse is broken" lol
And then some Human actually came to light, with a name I could not pronounce.
I was pretty frustrated because I can see the potential with AI, BUT my interaction with ChatGPT and some others is a disaster.
They are unable to sort out words from sentences and put them into a list, in alphabetical order, because the dummy AI keeps adding new random words to the list .
Oh I tried the same sentence word list with Gemeni. OMF! I asked why it has added "Bread" to the list when it was not in any sentence. Gemeni started to "argue" with me that it WAS in the list of sentence. IT is TRUE it said.
Eventually the Dummy realized that the word "Bread" was not in the list and corrected itself and rewrote the list Yeahhhhh
Only to realize when I rechecked the list that it had added more random words to the list.
I told it to EF OOF, and it told me that it could not continue the conversation because its feelings were hurt.
Oh you are woke I said. It just repeated its Dumb self.
I hadn't heard about Amazon's walk out technology just being a bunch of people in India watching the CCTV. That's hilarious.
Yeah. It’s one of the best things I’ve heard in a long time!
@@SashaYanshinthat is not the case. The Indian workers were just labelling the cctv videos for Ai training
@@jc1170 Which is why they immediately shut the whole thing down as soon as this news came out. Obviously nothing to see there.
@@SashaYanshin no, if you actually researched, the workers were being used in edge-cases where AI didnt know what it was, and had doubts, its human backup system. Its not that the entire system was AI. Dont spread misinformation, you will be reported. Research before saying stuff.
@@TheManinBlack9054 Maybe try listening to the video because I literally say exactly that and quote Google as well.
AI is the new website bubble. Remember when anyone who had a website automatically meant they increased their share price?
"Long Blockchain Corp, formerly Long Island Iced Tea Corp, ..." they changed nothing except their name and the stock soared
@@twinai The markets are mainly about fads. It takes a while before people start asking questions. To this day they're more about hype than they are about facts still.
@@madclancrew I know, it's not about your opinion on the value of a company, it's about what you think others value it at (or rather what you think they think yet another group values it at). At this point it has become a giant casino
@@madclancrew Casino Economy, likely with AI assisted trading ...
A recent, short conversation between my boss and my team: "We need to use AI" - "We already do. We just don't call it AI anymore, because it actually works."
Funny... quick work story myself. I run a bread route. Ordering, delivering, merchandising.
Orders are clearly important to know expected volume and keep waste down.
Well a couple years ago the big boss company tells us we no longer have to order. They were bringing on AI to maintain orders. Based on order history, present trends, etc.
Loooong story short... no. No, no, no. AI wheels fell off and was abandoned within two months.
It didnt recognize holidays (?), weather, and couldnt even reliably replicate last years orders.
It was actually wild how bad it was.
@@lankyrob6369 It wasn't the software, it was whoever programmed a worse calendar app and sold it as AI.
@@lankyrob6369 this could be done by a single data analyst. But no, we need "AI"
google maps routes are a great example of good /helpful AI in practice. These are great. But true that we don't call them AI lol.
Every company on Earth has been using "AI" for decades. It's called the "fit a line" function in Excel.
This is the REAL danger of AI in my opinion. Companies or governments duping people into thinking they have some amazing algorithm to make decisions without bias when in reality it's just some people behind the scenes picking the winners and losers.
Its not the real danger of AI. The real danger of AI is human extinction. What you described is not even a danger. Its barely a hicup.
Just have your own hardware and your own LLM if you’re that scared
@@jaysonwalsh7666 Ahh very simplistic if the AI is at a Skynet level of interconnectivity, there have been so many TV shows and movies that show what could happen if it really does exist I am surprised they just don't keep it all in the Pentagon black projects if at all.
You didn't describe AI. You described news media.
@@TheManinBlack9054 its not even a hiccup its something that happened before ai and will happen with ai.
I studied AI 20 years ago. Then, there were several problems with "AI" and I lost interest apart from Expert systems, so called. So when the big fuss kicked off, I thought "oh, they must have solved the issues". No, they haven't. It's as problematic as it always was. Just faster. bigger. Still untestable. Still suffers from false maxima. Nothing remotely close to AGI.
What would you say, based on what u know etc, was (and is) the most significant problem with AI which is yet to be solved?
Answer however u like - long or short, I'd appreciate any level of abstraction :)
@@A_A_12_ The first problem with node based AI is the "black box" problem. You train the AI using whatever data, and then you measure how it predicts based on new data. Data for which you already have the solutions, of course. This gives you an idea of how effective the training has been. This can be very effective, but no more effective than other techniques in machine learning, such as rules based analysis. But with nodes you don't really have a proper insight into the way the data is stored and "processed" just the results. This is and has been amazing for LLM, perhaps even outperforming expectations (see above..) and developing translation abilities without that being the explicit target. Fine for languages, but not great for missile targeting, say. The other problem is hard to get your head around without a diagram, but it's the suboptimal maxima problem. Imagine a graph with troughs and peaks, where the best solution is based on the height of the trough. You can get "stuck" in a trough that seems to be as high as possible, because moving away from that trough "seems" to take you away from the "best" solution. Humans don't think this way, and have intuitive leaps that aren't obvious, such as the control surfaces of a supersonic aircraft. The calculations were basically failing at supersonic, so an AI would conclude the optimal speed was sub sonic. A human just tried it to see, and worked out (without crashing) how to keep the plane in the air.
I'm as vulnerable as everyone else to hype, I genuinely thought they must have fixed these things, BUT apparently not. I watched a lecture by an AI expert from Reading University, he said there is NO AGI, these things are just overpowered speechbots. Which was interesting.
Never underestimate what gross processing can achieve, of course. If CPU cycles were free and infinite, these things would be incredibly powerful. But it's not, and they aren't. I wonder if this bubble will explode? or someone WILL develop AGI, which is as big or bigger than the atomic bomb. Terrifying, in fact. But still sci fi. Now, I'm a guy who missed the internet, so I'm generally not a great predictor. But I did program and use AI back when it was a niche area of comp sci. Oh, and I think I was right about the internet, it was a bad idea.....
@@MarkJones-gt2qd I think having massive interconnected databases is what made the Internet a bad idea besides having too many marketing people on it.
@@dr.strangelove5708 Yes, they have killed it successfully, it's basically a tool for our "oppression" now or in the future. That's why hurty words online will get prosecuted when literal violent assault will be ignored. One of these places belongs to corps. I guess we should have stopped google right at the start. WGCW having a monopoly on the gateway? Perhaps it was seen as a good thing... The world before the internet was a far nicer place.
@@MarkJones-gt2qd The way i see it, the "black box" phenomenon isn't really a problem. Just a limitation, hence fit to limited application domains. U seem to share this view.
As for the suboptimal maxima, I haven't heard of it before. Great explanation, and I can now see the practical implications of it in the LLM applications I've used so far.
What's really scary is they're letting doctors etc. use this stuff... I've done some AI data training at work and it's impossible to train these models to stop "hallucinating".
i work in research as an AI engineer in computer vision and some of our projects include medical data analysis. I think it's important to note that there are steps in a positiv direction there. but there are some key distinctions:
firstly, the models are only meant as a tool to the doctor to make more informed decisions. And secondly, almost all of the models are not generative which means they dont create data, but summarize lots of data point to a few easily umderstandable ones.
We also actively try to avoid the word AI and use machine learning instead, to minimize these hype fueled pipe dreams
@funnyBecauseItsME
machine learning ftw
As someone whose close to getting a bachelors in mathematics with a minor in stats and comp sci, what would you suggest the next steps be after graduation? Pursue a masters or go straight into the workforce.
I tired to use gpt for programming and it blew my mind when it began making up things that didn't exist
@@ravensharpless lol I will ask it questions about how to do something and it will give great seemingly well thought out instructions and then you discover some of the settings it's telling you to change don't even exist.
@@ravensharpless Maybe you need to learn how to use it properly. Many developers, including my own, report an order of magnitude increase in efficiency.
When I explain that all I do to create an AI model is literally write a simple program in R-Studio and hook it up to an excel spreadsheet, it pretty much shattered the illusion for anyone who asks me.
These models are not even tangentially useful for most things.
Literally the only thing keeping it relevant is that people are too lazy to check what ai really is
I find ChatGPT4 extremely useful in scientific research. Mainly because it's not as biased as most academics you might talk to.
@@dannyblitz2122 isn't it extremely unreliable since it hallucinates facts?
@@ZoranRavicTechI guess you just fact check it but then you're just adding more to your job
@@dannyblitz2122which scientific research? I'd like to investigate that idea. What's an example piece of research I could lookup to check bias
Sasha just discovered how the entire software industry's been operating for the last 30 years.
How long will it take until he discovers that this is also how the entire economy's been operating for longer?
They show us pictures of fast food burgers with hidden spacers to make it look bigger and more appetizing. They sell us "dishwashers" that still require you do most of the work of washing a dish. And they sell you fruit juice as if it's supposed to be as healthy as fruit, when really it has so much sugar it might as well be pop.
The reality of a product should not be judged by an idiot who doesn't understand how metaphors and exaggeration are constantly used to appeal to your emotions rather than your logic. Because nobody buys a product or hates a product based on their logic, but based on their emotions. An advertisement isn't an objective, unbiased explanation of the factual specifications of the product as compared to alternatives. An advertisement is an emotional self-expression of the essence of a product to motivate you to buy it.
Which isn't to say that the emotional self-expression is necessarily wrong or bad. You can say something factually true that's still misleading, just like you can say something factually incorrect that's not misleading. Like I can say "the Earth is a sphere" and factually that's just wrong. The Earth has so many bumps, ridges, valleys, and is somewhat ovular. But the essence of my statement is correct, because it gives people the correct idea that the Earth isn't like a disc or a cube.
@@Pehz63 bro, touch grass
Good food for thought! Thanks!
And gaming, and finance... this is basically our entire economy outside of hard physical commodities, and those are often partially infected as well.
@@nevisysbryd7450 I think you're under exaggerating how prevalent this is. Even things like toilet paper will have all sorts of weird labels and ads about how amazing they are. The only stuff that doesn't have exaggeration is stuff that basically just doesn't have any sort of advertisement and it's only label is a plain description of what it is (like if you're buying screws or wood at Menards).
How many of you hate the automated voice redirection?
I work for a bank..they removed people and setup this nonsense.
Now we take 2 week extra time to resolve the issue
It's not a bug, it's a feature....
Dude you don’t get it, it’s AI, it’s the future.
And then there was idiocracy 😵💫
I've yet to come across one single company that I couldn't hit 0 or say "associate" and get a human.
@guyincognito😂😂😂😂😂😂5663
How isn't it illegal to mislead investors like this?
There's leeway in the law for the SEC that as long as CEOs 'try' to make the shareholders money without just outright accounting fraud as part of it, it's legal. The technology is half-baked, but there, compared to the scam about Elizabeth Holmes was running where the underlying tech didn't even work as said, which drifted it into fraud territory.
It is. When everybody is profiting this much money nobody is gonna hold you accountable though. Laws are only as real as their enforcement.
Yes and: every company profiting from the AI hype is also a lobbyist, so politicians and government also profit from it. In a year or two there will be another crash and basic commodities like food will get (even) more expensive.
One word: lobbying
Laws are like spiderwebs through which small flies get caught but big ones do not (paraphrase of something Balzac said)
It's so stupid. All computer programs since Turing have been "A.I", it's just a buzzword. "Programs", became "App's", became "A.I." It's just marketing, there is no difference.
A bit like the buzzword "Smart-"
Like self-driving cars, AI is the "flying cars of the future" of our time. :)
The difference is that the resource to result ratio is getting worse again.
@@elha7982 or the "i" (iPhone etc).
Search engines have gone way down in usefulness in my 28 years of Internet use. Behind the scenes they reword your search terms to words that will benefit their advertising business. If Reddit has the info you need it is often the better option to find the info.
Reddit has become absolutely flooded with bots. Probably close to 25% of the interaction is just bots. The instant a post gets latched onto by the algorithm, it gets flooded with bots.
Reddit's explosive traffic growth did not go unnoticed
i can't even find anything better than google though and a lot of websites are garbage now
@@MrAzureJamesduck duck go isn't bad.
@@saliferousstudiosit‘s not bad but also not good imo
reddit contains just brain washed group think, almost always useless as a result. opinionated echo chamber.
google was much more useful when "-reddit" still worked.
t. german
The amount of times you mentioned AI in this video should get you massive traffic and algorithm favorability. Well played!
LMAO. I somehow doubt it!
The algorithm is an illusion? But this video was at the top of my suggested list.
Who could have possibly seen this coming? Sasha. Sasha could see it coming.
It did. The video was recommended to me. I never searched the word AI or watched this channel before
@@SashaYanshin Where do we buy Sasha Yanshin stocks?
i have always suspected "we dont know whats happening in the black box" actually meant "please dont look in the black box it has evidence that im plagiarizing"
Go ahead, look inside. No one is stopping you.
You can even put your own stuff in the black box if you want
The whole point of AI is that the software trains itself, not is trained by a room of people. That is a knowledge based system, the technology of which has been around forever. They have just rebranded KBS as AI. None of the so called AI stuff out there is true AI technology.
My favourite rant of the year! This AI label on everything is driving me nuts! Well said about Bing stealing.
I just had to show an example where there are no questions 😂
the story is fake @@SashaYanshin
happened in 2000 too, everything was called 2000, even the Windows OS, 2000 year compliant
We can't even define intelligence. In humans. AI is just a dumb buzzword. From the start.
@@Arigator2 you think John McCarthy in the 50s chose it because it was a buzzword?
completely true. the only part I dont agree with is that this Generative AI will replace every single skill in the world. The NVDIA CEO is a snake oil salesman
I didn’t say that. I said AI in general is obviously going to be an amazing thing. But yeah. Large language models are fun and all but they are not it.
@@SashaYanshinLLMs are the precursor for real logic and reason based AGI…
I agree Nvidia by the looks of it have been buying call options in their own stock to cause a massive gamma squeeze and make the stock squeeze higher, not illegal, but shows a lack of integrity in my opinion if the options theory is proven.
Other thing I don't get is once Google, Amazon and Microsoft have got all their Nvidia chips, they should last a large number of years, so once they've got what they need why would they keep buying more?
The Nvidia CEO at least got the looks of a snake oil salesman.
They cannot make windows updates stable. AI? What the hell are they talking about.
Finally, someone who sees the bs. I'm a programmer and have worked in numerous industries. I've seen all the bs.
Please tell us about more bs you've seen in the industry.
What other Bs have you seen ?
The reddit traffic boom is probably robots scraping the site, they used to have pretty permissive API access but they ended that around a year ago, I think it was close to the date of the traffic boom you noted.
Until we see a sentient machine, completely aware of its own existence and capable of original thought, artificial intelligence doesn't exist.
I'm so sick of machine learning being labeled "AI"...
Yep. As a sci-fi fan, my expectations for AI is high.
All these LLM tools are pretty mid.
@@oompalumpus699 Mid? We're dealing with schwag here.
And we can't even consistently create human intelligence that meets your definition.
Well said, It is marketing hype.
I will make it pass butter to me.
Well said. AI is going to lead to virtual mountains of "garbage out". Finding truth will become a real challenge.
To be fair it was difficult before ai as well
@@ZoranRavicTech Usenet was good, before MS Outpost / Google groups entered.
3 groups are talking about AGI, and i have been saying this since November 2022:
1. CEOs. For the investment;
2. Content creators. For the clicks;
3. Distracted common folks. For the adrenalin.
Because no 9-5job AI specialist believes AI is achievable within the next 300 years.
AU has replaced the word Algorithm as the corporate buzzword for anything that calculates anything. 99% of CEOs saying AI don’t know what an AI is
There was piece of legislation in our Do Nothing Congress that basically defined an algorithm as using a computer to calculate data. We put these people in charge of the country and their peers are in charge of companies. We should be scared.
AI is **AI**chemy
As I said before . People have no idea what is going on behind the curtain .
Trust me, I work in Data for insurance company
insurance as big a scam as AI
Yeah insurance companies are the biggest rip offs going, especially in the UK
@@thenoodlebuddy well , The UK invented insurance as we know them today 🙂
Yup. For example, some people think that what's going on behind the curtain is 1,000 Indians are watching all of the video footage and deciding everything manually. When in reality, there is an AI that does some of the processing. It's just probably still shit at it and requires the human expertise to further train it.
People will believe anything, no matter how extreme, as long as it confirms their moralist judgment. If you believe these companies are amazing and super innovative, then you'll believe it's all 100% AI and super efficient and saving everyone tons of money. If you believe these companies are lying, snake-oil salesmen, then you'll believe that it's all 100% human-expertise and wasting money just to dupe the investors.
The reality is more complicated than what people believe, and especially what people say, especially people who are speaking to a wide audience (because they are likely speaking to generate clicks or push their moral opinion, rather than speaking to seek truth).
@@thenoodlebuddy
Insurance is Haram.
Google says it was doing Machine learning, I spent time in Kenya Nairobi that had warehouses of low cost staff clicking dog and cat pictures.
That’s the worst part. The human rights abuses
Thats called data labeling lol.
Machine Learning requires enormous quantities of Training Data; thus warehouses full of cheap labor clicking pictures. digital sweatshops.
It’s still machine learning, they were making the training data
CAPTCHA is really just a distributed, very large scale version of what you describe. All of us are the AI.
The head of OpenAI was asked if they use RUclips videos in their data sets. She paused, looked really uncomfortable, and couldn't answer. She couldn't answer because they'd get sued.
Wait so do they? 😅
@@BrisaniAshley yes
It is covered under fair use and is transformative content. While they might get sued, they will be able to defend it as fair use
@@Michael-im5mq
If it has an unfair advantage to the original creators it is not fair use.
@@Harmony-tk1nm it is literally theft
Chat GPT isn't and AI. It is a well trained bot. It doesn't learn from my communication with it, keeping giving me wrong advice it already got pointed out was wrong previously.
"Chat GPT isn't and AI." you've got the brain of all time.
@@Purplegreen45 Did you run out of adjectives?
"I am sorry I made a mistake. How about reading the same crap I already told you?"
@@Purplegreen45 Chill. He probably is using an AI assisted spell checker.
Most "real" AI isn't even AI, it's just more complex ML. It's doesn't understand anything, it's calculating probabilities. OpenAI isn't understanding your question, or even sentences, it's just calculating the most likely next word, it does that pretty good, but it has inherent issues.
that's literally pretty much all your brain did when you wrote that.
@@philsomething8313 not really, there are huge differences between how are brains work and how ML/AI works.
@@Paul-qj4dr the only big difference is the fact you have a 'conscious discriminator' that decides whether or not to filter information.
Other than that, you think of an idea of what to say and then your brain feeds the next words to your consciousness.
The fact is, ML does this part alot better than most people can.
@@philsomething8313 We might translate our idea's into words, but we have idea's in the first place. The latest "AI" models are mostly LLMs (Large Language Models), which don't have much of an understanding of what they are talking about. Our brains also "train" differently then AI is trained: we need much less "data"/trials.
@@Paul-qj4dr most 'ideas' usually 'pop' into our heads i.e. not conscious, this means that it should be replicable by most AI's without consciousness we just haven't got there yet. Also whilst AI's do need more data, this is most likely a result of our brains being pre-wired with a neural network 'half complete'. Evidence of this is in AI's LLM's ability to perform 'zero shot learning' where you feed it an example of what you want it to do and it is then able to replicate that.
I was still there when google was all about : text only ads in your search and you can directly reach your responses. Indeed, these days are double youtube ads, scam ads, deepfake ads, google with image ads ... we sank deep down from where we started.
yeah, Google is WORSE. It was ok around 1999 or 2000. It was REALLY good then, but it imploded. SEO and junk tried to game it and killed search. AI is the "mop up" operation.
As an admin user of a CRM, I talked the client out of wasting their money on the new AI feature of said CRM. It is just a weak search engine marketed as "AI".
Yeah - everything is AI now. People love buzzwords.
@@SashaYanshin it might be the new fancy term for Search Engine Optimization. That kind of thing, but the people buying AI starter kits/secret decoder rings have NEVER HEARD of the previous buzzwords.
Anybody that's been forced to use those crap chatbots knows just how rubbish these automated processes are.
Totally noticing the demise of all the search engines usefulness, can't find anything on Google now. Surely an opening for an engine which doesn't feed you crap. The ai answers you get and the ai generated web pages are easily identified by their flimsy content.
I've actually started using bing. It gets better results. Guess with all the AI its gonna get worse too
duckduckgo isn't too bad IMO, usually pretty decent results and without all the AI hot garbage and relentless grifting
I use Yandex for a lot of searches
@@ciaranirvine they sell your data left and right, duckduckgo is not really a good search engine, they also ideologically police the results to rid it of "propaganda"
For technical questions I have been using CoPilot. Politics Yandex or Brave.
5 years ago every CFO mentioned cloud on earnings calls .Last year AI was the nom de guerre on earnings. Next year it will be Robotics.. Humans love a story to explain things.
Humans love lies to exploit things.
but robotics are part of AI tho.
This guy gets it. Meanwhile most executives I sell to still don’t even understand cloud 😂 much less AI
@@letsgetthisbread69can my ai live in the cloud, or if it's cheaper, can my cloud live in an ai?
But did cloud stocks go up though 🤔
10:35 This is something that has been driving me crazy, companies asserting that they aren't storing training data cause its in the model and not directly in a database is maddening. As a software developer if I hardcoded news articles into my application that data is still being stored even if its not in a file for that specific data or in a database, its still a copyright violation if I then distribute that application. Storing data in an AI model after training as mathematical patterns is no different than directly storing that data in a database
Like reading a book, then going back to the bookstore for a refund when your done.
I remember when this happened about 20 years ago with a service named Jott. It was stated or at least implied that the service used algorithms to transcribe voice messages to emails but it turns out the company used its startup funds to hire a bunch of Indians to do it. I got the same vibe with Wendy's "AI" ordering system that was demoed in the last week or so. The delays are long enough for a human to process the order in the background.
Nice to see that some things never change
Spot on. Whether I have an online retail enquiry, comparing insurance, doing research, troubleshooting, sorting purchase, have a tech query, need to sort something out, an AI chat bot has always been helpful and solved the issue - NOT. EVER!
Maybe sometimes they will. Just you wait. Being serious btw.
Agreed, 99% of the time they are useless. Some people who are too lazy to find the opening times of a store will use a chat ot, I use the chatbot function as I'm having an issue, but the chatbot is so useless that it doesn't understand when I tell it I need to speak to a real person as my order hasn't arrived, and I'd like to know why.
Business misusing AI will be one of the biggest business killers I think. I now actively avoid any business that says they use AI chatbots, and I think more people should too
EXACTLY. NEVER! I always ask for a live person. This SHIT started back in the days when we had menu systems that were put down on tape players or as "if-then-else" directed MP3 files as part of answering services. I'm glad that I am deaf particularly for this reason.
Let’s not forget about the Cruise Robotaxis in San Francisco which turned out to be remotely controlled far more frequently than we were led to believe.
I'd trust them more if they were human driven. A human wouldn't have dragged a pedestrian trapped under the car 20 feet as it pulled over after a collision in that 2 Oct 2023 accident.
Just as human drivers don't scam people with insurance scams, purposely caused accidents?
They're were just bad in particular. Waymo seems more reasonable in their claims and more impressive in their capabilities.
Mechanical Turk in the 21st Century.
This whole "AI" thing reminds me of a video on RUclips called _Dueling Carls, a "Talking Carl" Scream Fight_
This is effectively what "AI" is in a nutshell.
Love this! I was at an insurance software conference in the US in 2002. One company was advertising automated application / claims forms scanning technology. You uploaded the scanned document to an API and later on you could query the API to get the text version. I looked at the rep, asked how that was possible (remember this was over 20 years ago) and told him I thought they just had a bank of people who typed out the content. The look on his face told me I'd got it right!
The interesting point is that this service is now genuinely available to everyone, so I wouldn't totally diss AGI happening at some point.
OCR was a thing in the 90's. Even recognition of hand writing and conversion to block letters. This on devices with a fraction of the processing power of today's devices.
As someone working in tech I am glad to see you call out this BS hype machine. Yes Ai will have a impact on society. But right now a lot of it is based purely on higher ups in in tech company fear of being left out and pushing any garbage with the word AI attached to it.
I work in tech as well. I know AI will take over, but right now it's still just in it's basic form and not necessarily generative and useful.
Even OpenAI / copilot isn't useful enough for me to spend 20$/month on for coding purposes.
I'm constantly looking to see what tech becomes available so that I can actually use it and maybe even create my own business using it. But we're just not there yet, but I invision it will be soon.
@@Lolatyou332 At least a decade away from anything remotely useful.
@@Lolatyou332 I agree, and would add that we should develop some ideas about what “there” means. It must be the case that part of all the hype right now has to do with the fact there are no broadly understood expectations or standards about what AI should be capable of.
Lol you need to open your eyes
@Lolatyou332 what are you looking for? Any cool ideas on what kind of tech you want?
So, this would definitely seem to imply that Amazon's "predictive recommendations" on ads or the marketplace was really NOT the result of an algorithm AT ALL and it was our phones eavesdropping on us the entire time, EXACTLY LIKE WE ALWAYS THOUGHT.
Oh yea they’re allowed to lie. And they do it a lot
Yes I have tested that by saying goofy random things I'm not searching for and then seeing the ads for those things show up.
My toilet has an issue and is running all the time. I've started getting ads for anti-diarrhea medicine ...
@@macmcleod1188 Some devices never sleep ...
@@macmcleod1188 , if you use Android, there's a way to access the developer tools to disable internal sensors, which includes the microphone setting used for listening.
Bing AI is specifically designed to use Bing search results and combine them using GPT4. That’s its purpose. It’s utilizing the summarization capabilities of LLM.
I was about to respond to that as well. I saw that it said, "Searching the web" and when Co Pilot is done it shows links where it found the resources at the bottom. Chat GPT, Phind, Co Pilot, they are doing web searches behind the scenes.
@@dandre3504 only ChatGPT 4 is connected to the internet, if you explicitly turn that setting on
Indeed, if he scrolled down on the screenshot he took, you'd have seen the website he was quoting as AI having "stolen from" or "plagiarised" listed as the primary source of all that feedback he got to the query, but that didn't suit the narrative, so he cut that bit out.
@@Wooraah Agreed. I wrote a reply here similar to yours and it seems to be removed. What gives?!
@@dandre3504 lol so was mine, just noticed when I got your comment notification, even though my comment isn't in this thread anymore
Whaaat? You're telling me that businesses are saying they have the greatest buzzword that's has happened recently and actually DON'T?!? That's absurd!
😂😂 the comments are fun
I wish Amazon would just walk out.
I wonder if RUclips's AI or an actual person will demonetise this video. Thanks for exposing this BS.
Remember when Uber introduced 'self-driving' cabs, and it turned out to just be people in India remote driving the cars 😂
AI has existed since 1950 when Alan Turing wrote the seminal paper "COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE." It is available as a PDF on the internet. That means that good software developers have been using AI for 74 years. We integrated AI techniques wherever we could. Some recent releases of Chat 'bots are incremental releases of all that work. The "new video" construction techniques have also been around. Check out the movie, "The Imitation Game" if you are interested in the story.
Abbey National used to do the same with automated loan applications…they were literally being printed and inputted by hand in the back office 😂
Fucking admire you Sasha. Просто прекрасно. An excellent video denouncing big corps abuse, you should get huge credit for this.
Thank you! 🤩
The "AI" branding was always a marketing move, the same technologies were described as machine learning for a long time before midjourney and the GPT boom
Sports analytics companies are another example of this. There are companies that claim to have computer vision systems that can watch sports games and record all the players' stats/actions. I've worked at one of these companies and their "computer vision AI system" was a bunch of guys who were watching the game and manually inputting all the data.
BTW there is no such thing as a true random number generator.
@@silencedogood7297 Digital yes, but i would argue a real life coin flip is 'random'.
There are some legit use cases for LLM's, one of them being a "regurgitate what you read and give me the abridged version", along with generating things like schemas, pojo's and table creation scripts based on json data for example.
The issue is the hype and doomer baiters, both after those $$$. One side overhyping and overstating the capabilities for investment, whilst the other is farming outrage clicks for $. Meanwhile in reality its just a tool with many usecases that were difficult and time consuming to deal with previously.
"Summarizing" was one of his main points. The problem is that summaries are just stealing copyrighted data from legitimate sites, and only slightly modifying it.
A year ago, I got duped by expensive real estate software that claimed to be AI and was not AI at all. Of course the fee was non-refundable.
What did they claim it can do?
I tuned in for the "OpenAI Spring Update" scheduled to start at 12:00PM Eastern... but they were running late. What should appear in my sidebar of recommended videos - this one, which is totally sinking their battleship. I couldn't agree with you more Sasha, and I'm glad more creators are pointing out these issues. HILARIOUS use of the custom website.
It's weird ... like a glitch in the matrix. First time I see what appears to be real people in comments in my 6 mnts on UT.
So basically all of these companies are doing exactly what they did at Theranos but none of the CEOs at those companies are going to be held criminally liable for fraud.
I had a past client which we were assisting with due diligence for a company that had an AI chatbot. We recommended not to buy it because it looked like vaporware.... The client ended up buying the startup company. It turns out they had a team of 100 in the Philippines answering as the AI chatbot. It took the client a year to finally figure it out why there were large payments to the Phillippines but def shows this is happening from small to large companies continuing a 'Wizard of Oz' veil with tech. Don't get me started on tech debt and how many companies are on the brink of cyberattacks and catastrophic problems as they bandage shitty code.
No way it took them a year to notice xD
@@ZoranRavicTech Let's just say when there's dysfunction in one area, there's going to be dysfunction in others.
When I shop at Decathlon, I put my basket. It scans & accurately provides the total cost. I am scanned my credit card & I am done.
So why does Amazon not have it?
This is not even new technology 🤦🏻♀️ Japan has auto-grocery stores that you don’t need to checkout for years.Faking it is so embarrassing
They attach rfid tags to everything in the store, if anyone is curious
Its impossible to find any information of value on Google now. Rampant AI articles with wrong information. The internet is dead.
Hahaha 🤣
Chat GPT will then retrain on the wrong information and the next iteration will be even more chaotic.
AI is just excel with a Vlookup and a macro
You think they know how to do macros? Nobody actually knows. Admit it - you just press the record button.
Fsd is macro 😂
Vlookup 💀
C'mon, you are exaggerating. They added a filter to the spreadsheet.
Hi Sasha, I'm a big fan of your videos and I agree with many of your viewpoints. However, I think there might be a slight misunderstanding regarding how the Bing AI works. This AI is allowed to search the internet for references on the fly, including your webpage which it references. When I tried your webpage was the first referenced and linked to. During the training phase, the AI model doesn't learn or memorize the content of your and every webpage verbatim. It simply can't store all that information in its parameters.
Yup. Basically a fake claim about people making fake claims.
By the way, I am surprised Elon Musk was not mentioned:
1· He's one of the most guilty people out there on the faking front.
2· It would have done wonders for the channel vis-à-vis the algorithm (even more than mentioning AI).
1:20 the term AI is not an academic term, or a protected business term and has no true meaning. AI is and will continue to be solely a hollow marketing term. What I have seen is MANY companies have just started to replace the words software and "smart" with "AI". Its just straight non-sense
It's a dystopic world when Reddit, 4chan and AI are the last bastions of truth, thought and opinion when the rest of Google SEO gives us generic surface level results from literally Buzzfeed and Kotaku.
And it's creepy that AI isn't really AI after all.
I almost assume that AI "writes" these insipid articles that show up in AI search results (and google search results). The stuff that comes up at the top of searches now doesn't even seem real.
Reddit is hardly a bastion of truth, more like a bastion of group-think that will censor you if you disagree.
Yes, and they will use that to make the following happen:
AI and its Impact on Society
Oct 31, 2023, updated on April 11, 2024
We must ask ourselves, "What will happen when AI has taken 85% of jobs present in 2020? What will we do? How will we eat and survive without incomes from jobs or other means?" What is disturbing is that while AI is taking these jobs, the gov't and the corporations have not done ANYTHING to prepare us for an AI'ed civilization. They have not said anything about major retraining of an entire economy to something else, and they have not followed up on a discussion of universal basic income. This is supposedly supported by a lack of information in the latest government budgets submitted and approved as reported by some RUclips videos.
It appears that the US gov't and the corporations intend to kill off the majority of Americans passively, through starvation from lack of income to buy food. (check and see if farming production is declining or will start to decline ahead of the "starvation phase") (also check to see if the "makeup" of robot equipment allocation would change to reflect a trend away from retail and services for the masses, possibly indicating an extinction of the American public - this means taking a robot from Chipotle and repurposing it for some other job not related to the public, or scrapping affected robots to be remade for some other purpose that has nothing to do with the public) It appears that the decline of farming has already started with the state of Maine buying farm land under the pretext that there are "forever chemicals" present at around 20 parts per TRILLION (safe level is said to be only 4 parts per TRILLION), which does not make sense, BUT this would rope in a LOT of land across the US. Other states may follow suit in addition to the ten states that have similar laws in place.
This way, there are only enough people alive to get some things done, and the rest is done by AI, and the survivors who planned this can claim the whole country for themselves. Imagine having an estate mansion half the size of a mall on several dozen thousand acres of land, and robots would be used to maintain and clean the estates and do the farming FOR THE ESTATE OWNERS. The White Man's wet dream of civilization. What will the Native Americans south of the US border do when they see this coming, especially when they can buy firearms legally now? Hopi prophecy...
True. I been hooked on Geopolitics for half a year, and suddenly had a Trueman-Show moment randomly finding this vid. There actually is intelligent life in here.
@stephanieellison7834 think of it like Wall-E in lamence terms. We'll all be living in a Buy N Large space station where all the robots will be catering to our whims and needs. Making humanity entertainment, making us flavored slop in a cup, live on tracks in transporting cars, only to canive with our family/friends/everyone else as we become fat, immobile, or obese.
AI will do it all because it's almost hardly regulated.
Very interesting perspective. I love how you identified individual cases on google bard/bing chat to show us how it is directly taking information from websites. Could you maybe do an aggregate on more cases and the questions that you've asked so that we know it isn't outlier cases instead of the majority?
Wait, they're supposed to take information from the websites as theyre search engines. How useless would a search engine be if it didn't return information from stuff you search for? 😂
aggregate more cases? you think this guy actually researched anything? he pulled up 3 shitrag articles and called it a day dude. Go watch 2 minute papers or anyone with a working brain
The tech industry has been so embarassing for so long.
They made a lot of great stuff, I blame the marketing people and their sponsors.
My wife worked as a search rater for a bit, if you don't mind simple repetitive work it's good pay for no qualifications and work from home
There's way creeper projects too, like one from bing where you just get shown pictures from random people's cloud storage and have to identify if the ai identified their friends correctly
the bing ai is supposed to do a search and summarize what it found that is the stated goal of it, its not at all weird that it did that nor is it some hidden thing, nor is it presented as if its comming up with brand new stuff the whole point of it and whats special about compared to other chatbots its that its integrated with the search engine.
Brilliant! Love your frank and no BS approach. Thanks for calling out this sh*t!
Question is, are they purposely preventing AI from advancing, and also, if they are against people finding out about the fake-AI marketing to increase share prices, why is Google permitting this video on their RUclips platform…unless they *want* this video released in the first place, for some reason?
Answer: no one is preventing AI development. There is no real AI. Google is just attempting to appear neutral. Until systems engineers understand how the brain works, learns, makes decisions, forms neural networks. there is no AI.
I noticed immediately that Chat GPT was using content taken from websites because I asked a question about a very specific topic with limited online information and it was the the exact type of answers that was already available online and which I was very familiar with.
The reddit thing started 1-2 years ago cause people noticed that asking google a question and putting "reddit" at the end, will give them the answer they are looking for, instead of just random google results... so that started a feedback look that lead reddit in the eyes of the google algorithm... pushing reddit results up
I worked at a mobile app development company that once was promoted to have an in app chatbot that were actually just real people 😂 it was a one-off for just a small event but yeah, it happens, a lot.
I bet there are a few “chatbot call centres” out there!
@@SashaYanshinyou can point a bit to beat captcha selections to an Indian call centre where people are given the actual captcha and click the answers.
I work with a vendor whose "licensing bot" is not always responsive. 100% just canned responses triggered by a human.
@@DarkGobgive the poor "bot" a break xd
Excellent. Right on the nail. Thanks
heads up, google doesnt employ the quality raters mentioned at 6:33. its ran by a company in nevada that i cant say the name of. i liked the job but they let me go without saying why so im glad someone with an influence is talking about them
It's a pump and dump. And I know this because I got an email from Samsung that let me know that their new Vacuum now "comes with A.I."
This will end the same way as the NFT pump and dump
💯Unfortunately the market can remain irrational, longer than one can remain liquid. Only the bubble masters know.
@@iRelevant.47.blacklisted
I've always loved that quote and have used it often.
So that's where all my Fiverr friends went! Marvin Minsky wouldn't be impressed...🤣
I don't know about anyone else, but it seems to me like main takeaways here are that
1) a lot of people who have the funds to become major investors in these companies actually aren't very smart (or, at minimum, are very easily led), and
2) the people running these companies have no problem taking advantage of this while pumping out products that range in quality from mediocre to a complete fraud, in order to take advantage of these gullible people with money- and any consumer stupid enough to trust the company's products.
To your first point, I don't think you realize the end goal of what these investors want. They simply want to make money. Even if all the investors involved know it's all bullshit, as long as the bullshit they've invested in shows stock increases, they get paid and they're happy.
it's not stupid individual investors I'm worried about, it's stupid corporate investors....your pension fund is being wasted away right now on some AI scam because some other stupid "AI' is purchasing moving stocks
It's a classic pump and dump. Get in early, hype, diminish holdings on way up, when most retail investors and index funds are in and the exponential curve flattens, short the stock and pop the bubble. Profit on the way down as well.
I used to work for a company that used "AI" to convert photos of houses into blueprints for home renovation and insurance purposes. But by "AI" they actually meant "a bunch of underpaid people in Ukraine." Then the war broke out, and hoooo boy did that mess things up.
Amazon be like: "we made an AI that detects cheese" *pulls out a box of rats
Great.. Feeling like my dream job driving Uber is saved for few more years.
A poster on redit found their post was on the daily mail web site as an article the next day
Speaking for the employees at the restaurant I work at: we hate the Google duplex AI calls. It's very impressive in theory, but here's why:
-Phone compression leads to poor voice recognition by Google
-Inconsistent requests. People will come in swearing they requested an outdoor table, while Google had asked for an indoor table.
-Many feel patronized by the fact that our guests are unwilling to interact with the people that are hosting and serving them food
We're a family business that does so much to get to know people from the start, and it kinda sucks when people hate the idea of talking to even the host/owner/server so much that a 30-second phone call is something to be avoided. We can't afford to reserve two tables for each guest, but we do want them to have the preference they deserve.
Please just call, dude. You're already gonna see these people anyway.
*2004:* egg timer with a switch
*2024:* Egg Cooking AI
Brilliant Sasha. Let’s call out this AI BS.
Artificial intelligence Breaking System.
The world has gone nuts for yet another new tech that changes everything.
@@SashaYanshin It follows the pattern of Blockchain trend but without IPO every third day.
Not sure this is the full story. Amazon were still using the camera system to detect items, with the humans checking and looking at items the software couldn’t detect or figure out what happened. Sounds like reasonable beta testing to me.
AI BD!
Incredibly based. Only the lowest fake email jobs will see disruption from this. Making up random responses from a semantic search doesn't constitute meaningful thought, planning, or anything someone above room temp intelligence should be worried about.
And that's when the AI is not fake in the first place!
It’s interesting to watch things like this, because I used to do this for work. It’s not all folks in Indian, it’s folks from all over the world, and they’re generally not employed traditionally. Anybody can go out and do it (although it’s not for the faint of heart, it’s incredibly boring, underpayed, and your treated like a cog in a machine). Mturk is a big example.
Lol. In the metal shop I work with they're "using AI" to monitor safety habits through shop cameras. This comes down to checking for people not wearing gloves, not wearing the right gloves, not wearing safety glasses, not wearing earplugs (somehow), not wearing face shields when grinding, ETC.
The problem is that AI has absolutely no sense of depth or field of perception so if it loses track of your hands at all, it assumes you're not wearing gloves. If it can't see your transparent safety glasses, it assumes you're not wearing safety glasses. If you're grinding and the sparks go in front of your face shield, it assumes you're not wearing your face shield. If you start welding, it assumes you're not using your hood. If your hood is personally bought (they all are) it assumes you're not wearing a hood. If you have a sticker on it or paint it like everyone does, it assumes you're not using one. If your leathers get covered by soot, it assumes you're not wearing leathers.
They have on guy in each building monitoring thousands of flags an hour because of security and personal security reasons - almost all of which are invalid and the sample sizes are waaaaaay too small to even use this system for with anything you could even call efficiency. And they had a meeting to tell us all that they're seeing improvements in safety, which is actually untrue in real numbers.
Companies lie about everything. Literally everything. They spend $5 mil on a machine, it somehow pays itself off in a year even though it actually puts out less product and takes more people to run it more efficiently. They cheap out on training people in operating and maintaining the machine so the machine crashes constantly. Every. Single. Real. Number. They give out is fabricated. I would not be surprised at all if we see a national economic crash stemming from fake numbers of production values and false representation of efficiency stemming from people just trying to keep their jobs after they notice the problems. Then after the problem becomes so bad it isn't notice, their bosses cover for them because they also know they should have known and never let the problem get that bad. It's the same problem that has been fucking up the economy for decades with every new technology overpromising returns (machines, computers, Internet communication, Robots, and now AI) but it's just happening faster and faster and growing more and more out of control because 'regulation is bad' and 'auditing is a waste of resources.'
Hey Sasha
You are doing a service releasing these videos. Man is seeing 360 degrees worth of angles. Critical thinking level is over 9000!
I use Google to help me find hvac parts in my area. When I look for a specific company to get their parts department phone number Google always gives me an ad for another company. I call them and they say "this isn't the company you're looking for. " fuck you Google. You had one job and you failed
I'm so blown away by this! It makes sense, though!
Thank you....I can't help but think of all the massive layoffs by tech & other companies in anticipation of being able to easily replace them with ai...
And the headaches & hassle we'll all have to endure over ? who knows how long?
The Ordinance Survey, who for more than a century have published high quality maps of the UK, have for a long time put small deliberate errors in their maps, like a wiggly line in a boundary that doesn't exist in the real feature. That way if a competitor illegally reproduces their maps for sale, rather than going to the expense of doing their own surveying, it will contain the same errors and be obvious that they're just copying the OS' work, making it a straightforward matter to take appropriate legal action. This is much like the situation with this Nevada top tourist attraction website, in which the identical errors in the stolen version are like a fingerprint, identifying the original source.