Your cat biting the shit out of your fingers when you were talking bout humans willingly putting themselves through pain was masterful, 10/10, love their acting choices.
So perfect, to me cats transcend human moral visions in amazing ways. One moment I see my cat in ecstatic bliss at the simple pleasure of having a good stretch in a sunny spot. In another moment I see it's intense delight in drawing out the suffering of a mouse it has caught for as long as possible, giving it brief moments to hope it has escaped only to recapture it.
The real horror of Hellraisers was never "These people exist, and _they might come for you~"_ It was always supposed to be a more existential "There are people who _want this,_ and with the right circumstance, it _could be you."_
One of the things I disliked most about some of the sequels was studios making the cenobites basically cookie cutter slasher villains instead of them being creatures just doing their job and only going after those who seek them. One of my favourite scenes in the series is in Hellbound when Pinhead stops the cenobites going after the mute girl because it wasn't her who was actually seeking them despite her solving the box.
When I was at theatre school in the early 90's, I was assigned a prop making task of carving a wooden dagger from a piece of 1" x 4" pine. We were given a template to trace the design onto the wood, and after that we were on our own. This bears relevance. My good friend was a huge Clive Barker fan, and had just purchased a copy of Weaveworld in anticipation of Barker's appearance at a local book store for a signing & sales . I stood in line beside him as he had his book signed, and then suddenly I was there, facing him, with nothing in my hands. Clive looked at me and i reached into my backpack and produced the piece of wood, with the dagger drawn on it. "Never signed one of these before.", he offered. I'd like to think that, all these years later, he still hasn't been asked to sign a small piece of wood with a dagger drawn on it. That's all.
My car's door handle broke off in the winter when my brother was trying to get it open, the door being frozen shut. Then in the summer I was at a music festival with the chance to meet one of my favorite bands but having brought nothing to be signed, so I presented them with the door handle. I still have it somewhere.
That's so awesome! I'm a huge Clive Barker fan, Weaveworld is probably my second most favorite book by him, Imajica is absolutely the first. But wow, what an incredible memory to have. I met George Romero, (also George RR Martin but that was way back in 2004), and getting to meet Barker would probably tie with Romero.
Now I'm thinking of the cellar doors on Russian Doll. It *was* extremely funny watching Natasha Lyonne tumble face-first to her death like "Those things are a menace!"
One thing I always found interesting was that Leviathan, the Cenobites' boss, wasn't a god of evil, pain, or death, but of order. Typically in mythology, gods of order are seen as "good" deities who are placed as gods to be followed and worshipped. But in Hellraiser, the ultimate "big bad", so to say, isn't an entity that destroys structures, but one that maintains them
There's nothing quite like the tyranny of stasis. If chaos is unlimited potential, order is the complete lack of it. The point of existence where nothing new can ever be.
Yeah, there's plenty of evil order in fiction. Faustian bargains and hell's hierarchy are very orderly in them ye oldeny books and tales. Skynet represents absolute order. The Machine God from World of Darkness does as well. (As do plenty of other equally horrific Machine Gods in fantasy/Sci-Fi.) The Borg from Star Trek and the entity from the Movie "Virus" are great examples of how horrific order can be when it's forced upon us chaotic little fleshbags. I also think The Cube, with all it's _seeming_ gore trap "randomness" represents order too, completely uncaring and beyond our reasoning just as equally extreme chaos (like Event Horizon) would be.
Exactly, in addition Leviathan kind of has an extra terrestrial element to it. And yes, hells chain of command is about obedience and control not chaos and freedom. Hell is not shown to be a burning lake and Leviathan likes humans to make it's vintage torture devices. In addition, the cenobites, therefore, act like draconian prison wardens. It's a macabre prison system.
thats because Life is chaotic. The cenobite God is anti-Life. anti-chaos. It's actually quite beautiful. Clive being a homosexual has a profound understanding of his homosexuality. I feel as though he was making a very controversial statement but he does it so well - it flies right over most peoples head . I believe- he s stating that religion is anti-life , anti-freedom. constraining life to order, warps it into something that is grotesque and abominable in attempt to ascend the flesh.
"... if you're frightened of dying and you're holding on you'll see devils tearing your life away, but if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels freeing you from the earth. It's just a matter of how you look at it." “The only thing that burns in hell is the part of you that won't let go of your life: your memories, your attachments. They burn them all away, but they're not punishing you, they're freeing your soul.” ― Meister Eckhart
I’ve honestly always liked the IDEA and world building of Hellraiser more than the movies themselves, including the original ones. This analysis is just reinforcing in me that there is an absolutely amazing story waiting to be told when the marriage of all of these points come together. Many of them have each element, but I still don’t think we’ve quite gotten the best Hellraiser movie.
Totally agree! Currently my favorite “version” of Hellraiser exists in Peter Mohrbacher’s concept art for the 2022 film. Mohrbacher is known for his Angelarium series, an artbook based around its surreal posthuman figures, so he kind of got a headstart in conceiving what the angels of Hellraiser might eventually reach. I especially really like the Cenobite’s he’s drawn with completely hollowed out skulls- the idea that a person might be able to have their brain scooped out and yet still be alive is just so grotesquely fascinating in that perfect Hellraiser way.
I think the biggest issue with how people write the Cernobites is they forget the pretty damn important fact that they seek unlimited pain AND pleasure. They seek extreme sensations of all sorts, not just the negative ones.
Agreed, no one not even bdsm people who have a safe word just in case, seek complete Neverending pain. I think it was lost that these people in the movie want sensations that one cannot achieve on earth. The ultimate high, with the deepest low.
Totally. I think anyone who thinks the cenobytes are evil doesn't understand Clive Barker. He relates to the monstrous. It's always people who are truly evil in his lore
@@amandamarinovich6164 Thats because Clive Barker is a victim of post modern deconstruction, inversion and relativism. His metaphysics, theology and understanding of philosophy are not on the same level as his writing skills. My favorite irony is that the cenobites are clearly inspired by what was going on in the deviant bdsm gay scene of that time. I know he probably didn't see it that way back then but the fact that he chose to map this particular facet onto the demons exposes something disturbing about the directed effort to attack the nuclear family by the way of transgressive influences enabled by weak permissive personalities (Julia) entering in through the backdoor . Hellraiser was never more relevant than it is today. Unintentionally Barkers old work makes him look like a great christian writer who was struggling with himself
The moment you started tackling the concept of Cenobites NOT being demons, you'd won. Immediate sub. This was beautiful. Definitely going to go on a bingewatch of your content.
The focus on sensation is what most people don't get. That's why the remakes ending made me emotional: the cenobites are appalled because the protagonist chooses to bear the guilt for her actions. A being purely bent on pain and suffering should be satisfied, but they're not because guilt is purely intellectual, it's a self imposed torture born of thought.
I’m a tattoo artist and when you mention how pain is part of the appeal you were 100% correct. My most loyal and consistent clients are the people who generally enjoy the process of the pain. I like to think it’s a spiritual experience for tattooer and the person being tattooed. Something humans have done as long as we’ve existed and I feel blessed to get to participate in it. The only art that is as permanent as our lives. Very cool video I really enjoyed it 💖
As someone who has a good few palm size bangers, and two larger ones that were much longer sessions (7 and 9 hrs) I definitely found the longer sessions had moments of disassociation. I am hesitant to call it transcenance more like my brain fully accepting the pain, but yeah, I definitely enjoyed the longer sessions, and I definitely love getting tattooed. I had a full back piece done in one session and i felt like a different person by the end of it...maybe that's just PTSD? 😅
i hate the pain in longer session, but somehow it's tolerable pain. can't explain it, haven't felt any enjoyment though yet lol. arms felt only relaxing, also they were quite fast to make even when big @@teenagebottlerobert
lol my first 2 tattos are right on my left ribcage. that part of my body is covered in ink. my 3rd one is directly on top of my sternum, dead center. 4th is right below that one, and my 5th, but not final tattoo stretches from collarbone to collarbone and runs across my upper chest. the whole pain and identity argument is absolutely relatable.
I always hate when people call them demons, you really hit the nail on the head. I always describe them as BDSM angels because (originally) they don't have malicious intent. Their intent comes off as malicious to _us_ but isn't _inherently_ malicious, they bring the euphoria and horror of where extreme pain and pleasure meet, they don't see this as bad, its neutral at least, beautiful at best. I love love love how you talked about Jamie being cast as Pinhead and why she was perfect casting. It's something I haven't really been able to articulate. Thank you so much for recognizing the important influence of Clive's Queerness on Hellraiser, so many people don't take that into account even though its a pivotal part of why Hellraiser _is_
I think there's even a little more sort of dry humour in The Hellbound Heart, when Frank summons the Cenobites but clearly misunderstood what they're actually all about, and before they get to work on him it almost feels like they're side-eyeing each other as if to say "Did this idiot get a wrong number?". They do make sure to ask "Hey, are you sure?" and Frank's just grasping at straws. It feels like visitors from a hidden plane of sensation giving a collective shrug, I love it. Kafkaesque, maybe? I'm not as critically literate as I'd like to be
11:20 - Holy shit. Subscribed. Hellraiser is my favorite horror franchise because of its explorations in pain, even when in painfully bad movies. I deal with severe chronic pain and there's no escaping it or justifying it, there's just dealing with it or not. But I can, and do, use it as a sort of running tally proving I'm still here and I try to use it as fuel for my art. It's part of that Jungian Magnum Opus, I just happen to have a fairly large helping of a Piece of the Void. "One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star..."
Great analysis. I think the only thing I would add is that at least in The Hellbound Heart the cenobites seem to be pioneers of sensation who left behind a guidepost. It says, "if you've reached your limit on what you feel you can sense come this way for the next step." The problem is that pleasure and pain are on a spectrum of sensation. In one sense (pardon) pain is simply overstimulation, too much pleasure. The Cenobites are just able to go farther than humans can on that spectrum but they are happy to let anyone who wants to follow them as far as they can go. But no take backs. So Julia's story and Frank's story are "how far are you willing to go to get the thing you think you want only to realize that you got what you asked for, not what you wanted." Kind of a Monkey's Paw deal.
@@918_xDx "Man I really love little physical puzzles and trinkets. There's something satisfying about solving them." "Ah, you've solved the puzzle box so you tire of the drudgery of your limited existence and desire to be flayed and hanged from meat hooks!" "...no."
Pausing the video two minutes in to breathe a sigh of relief whenever someone acknowledges that the franchise lost its way with part three, not seven or ten.
Hellraiser is my favorite cosmic horror. Because unlike alot of it, it doesn’t just ape Lovecraft’s visual styles and themes. Clive Barker actually considered his own fears and philosophies and made something that fit into that. Lovecraft was terrified of the concept of an indifferent universe, one that was beyond his comprehension, just as he was afraid of rot and oceanic creatures, and that all informed his writing. Barker made a universe that is dictated by pain and the blending of sensation beyond all reason. Brutal order and hedonistic stagnation in a way that is not indifferent, but *joyous.* The cenobite are only concerned with who chooses to join them, they themselves were once humans who sought out this edge of sensation. It’s a different form of cosmic existentialism and I love it for that.
Good comment but I wouldn't consider Hellraiser cosmic horror because it isn't cosmic in scale, even if the cenobites and their realm are kind of lovecraftian.
“sensation is the god that supersedes all gods” amazing poetry of words here, and incredibly profound. every religion when stripped to its bare parts deals with humanity’s relationship to sensation. whether we are chasing ecstasy, running from suffering, or trying to rid ourselves completely of our emotional response to either, it all comes down to our sensations.
I adore Clive Barkers work and am always saddened by how he’s not often talked about more widely in horror circles despite the amount of media that has been inspired by his works; Thank you for this break down- your thematic analysis in this video and several others is fantastic!🦔🦔
This has me thinking how so many of his movies end up going down the spiral of become VOD, or Straight To DVD Bad Sequels. Wishmaster, Candyman, Hellraiser, etc. Each of these films are beautifully horrifying genre changers. And after that, they’re all slopped together. I truly believe it’s because these stories shouldn’t need follow-up in movie form. The more sequels you’re granted, the less creative control and influence you get.
True- SO much of his work is fantastic as stand alone pieces to make you think- candyman lingers in my mind so many years after i've seen it, while the sequels didn't last more than a day (Other than the impact Tony Todd's great performances in each)@@HorrorbleCWalt
"How much can you change and get away with it, before you turn into someone else, before it's some kind of murder?" - Richard Silken I'm writing a book. Dystopian fantasy 'mythic-punk' where one of the lead characters has voluntarily had their humanity stripped out of them so that he may bring balance and safety to a world teetering on the edge of oblivion caused by institutionalized morality, greed, and weakness. And I think there is some correlation between that process and the one described by one returning from the heroes journey " changed and enlightened but unrecognizable to yourself and everyone you know". This notion that to save humanity, to save the world, you can't BE part of humanity, you can't BE part of the world but rather exist outside its morality and reason so you can see it clearly. This was really really good.
This analysis was very well thought out. One of your points reminded me of this Thomas Ligotti quote: “Pain is essential. There's nothing else to do, no other way to be. We can call it what we like, say the pain is something else, or part of something else, and never fret about finding it to be otherwise. Finding it untrue. Because pain is essential, it is all there is.”
I have never watched a hellraiser movie in my life but the ‘lament configuration’ is the coolest fucking name for anything ever and completely redeems the franchise in my eyes
The remake isnt perfect but the different "configurations" it talks about are pretty interesting and especially the way it defines the lament configuration especially i thought was really meaningful
I think that the way you are viewing Lovecraft is slightly wrong. He was a very small person despite his height and he thought he was better than the average person. If you look at his work, there are 3 things that always show up. First, he will describe one of the characters as being from a family of New England blue bloods. His wife's family had money and a lineage but he came from nothing in those respects. Second, he will give a graphic description of a structure. Things like the type of roof and windows. He was a failed architect. Third, he mentions some ancient legendary tomb. Things like "The Necronomicon" and "The Book of Eibon". He didn't get much recognition while alive. Put these things together and we have an author writing character that what he wants to be. The number of times a monster actually appears in the stories is like 5 and even then it's glimpses and impressions mostly. This is what Lovecraft was writing about whether he knew it or not. Fear, helplessness, shame, doubt, anticipation, worthlessness and inadequacy just to name a few. The genre of "Lovecraftian Horror" has his name but he only put in a small part of what is known as the "Cthulhu Mythos" and many of the monsters in it never appear anywhere near his stories. Just some thoughts
The Outsider is probably Lovecraft's wholistically best work because it is the most sincere about all of these anxieties, and places them appropriately, for once. (Which is to say, in the interaction between the individual and society, and not the fact that the Dutch or black people exist.)
I mean...yeah, the monsters don't physically show up in the most of the work because the fear of the unknowable is the point; almost an antithesis to spirituality whose primary purpose is the cessation of that fear whether it's obvious unknowables like death or the more insidious ones like the nature of men. Been known for a pretty long time we fear what we conjure in our imaginations more than what someone can show to us. Horror and terror are distinct sensations in response to different stimuli. I don't really disagree with anything else said here as I haven't thoroughly exhausted the work to know whether your thesis about the 3 things that always shows up holds true. Interesting perspective nonetheless.
@@kylegonewild I had replied to you but it didn't post it for some reason. I don't remember what I said but I will try again. The beings in his books are in fact "physically" present most of the time. In the 30's it seems like the understanding of the 4th dimension was that it was a spacial dimension. This is present in his stories as he would often use the plot device of the monster is a color that humans can't see or they occupy a spacial dimension that we can't experience. The point is fear of the unknown. Of that you are correct. I am presenting the reasoning as to why he wrote about it. He was haunted by dreams as a child and he carried his fear from sleep to his waking life. It's my speculation that he didn't receive much sympathy for this. I will elaborate on that shortly. The things that caused him fear were not real but he would have the feeling that something was there trying to get him. How would these feelings manifest in the writing of an author? You would show no monster as you never saw one yourself. You would write about impressions and a sense of knowing that it was near. As for the justification for the speculation, I believe the concept of going mad from seeing an old one is the manifestation in the writing of how he felt as a child when trying to relate what he experienced at night. While it is said you go mad, not a single person actually does. Characters that experience an old one do try to relate what they saw but nobody believes them. The story they tell is so fantastic that no person in their right mind would believe it. This is what gets the label of mad applied. It is not the seeing doing anything other than inducing extreme terror. The characters are locked up in institutions for telling their story or at best ostracized by the town. It is not hard to line up. He would wake in fear and try to tell someone about it. They were not understanding of how afraid he was and he received nothing in terms of support. He was very isolated as a child and weird to boot so considering the types of things he was afraid of, getting called mad seems like a reasonable possibility. The themes that people choose to put in their writings are often a direct reflection of how they feel or have felt whether knowingly or unknowingly. It is not always the case but it is a good rule of thumb when trying analyze a body of work. I think he is a lot more obvious with respect to that than most. Give @HorrorBabble a look if you're interested in getting more aquainted with his books or the greater mythos. There are hundreds of hours of well produced content from various authors. Ian Gordon has a great voice and sense of the material. He also writes some great stuff. Check it out and let me know if you arrive at similar conclusions about where Lovecrafts life experiences informed his writing.
@@SamuelBlack84 Among other character flaws, definitely. The stories from that time often had what is seen today as racist. Rightfully so imo. After having listened to the bulk of the mythos, I have noticed some differences. Lovecraft used terms like "my yellow guide" or "low-bred mongaloid features" with obvious derision. Conversely, Robert E Howard often used "blacks" or "negroid" but in the next sentence he would describe "how beautiful her black skin was". Others like CAS(Clark Ashton Smith) would use similar language but seemed more apathetic to the races of his characters. Not many people of color were a MC. Judaism is a religion and not a race so it's always been weird to me that it is put in the same category as ethnicity but it was and still is. Lovecraft was a detestable human being and the stories display parts of those short comings. I would have avoided him like the plague if I was a contemporary.
As a Stoic, I want to point out that Stoicism is fundamentally incompatible with productivty/grindset/sigma culture. The passionate pursuit of wealth and material success renders one incapable of achieving dispassion. The "Stoics" you see are not genuine, they just take Marcus Aurelius quotes out of context, who also was not technically a Stoic, either.
She clearly doesn't know what she was talking about when she started ranting about stoicism, the video just became cringe. She doesn't seem to know the difference between the English word stoic and the philosophy of Stoicism
@@seekthevisceral As a vegan who still eats meat in secret, certain Snapple flavors do not conform to my dietary guidelines and therefore must chastise all use of Snapple.
I recently had a cluster headache, and I came out of it thinking a lot about Hellraiser. It was the most excruciating experience I've ever had. I have a new perspective on pain. I've seen the face of the Pain God, and I hope I never see it again.
Well, this video just earned you another subscriber. I'm a Buddhist and the religion is very much about how suffering is simply inevitable because you are alive. The ultimate goal of Buddhism is to eliminate suffering, but (at least in Tibetan Buddhism) that doesn't mean that you run away from suffering. Suffering is something that happens because you cling to your body and your ego. If you stop clinging to the self, your mission then becomes to eliminate suffering for others, which actually means that you take on suffering for "yourself" (which is actually just a collection of mental designations). If we can become adept at doing this, then we will attain enlightenment, which is a state that is both transcendent and imminent in a very immediate way.
What I appreciate in this perspective is the point that suffering is an inevitable consequence of existing as a functioning human. What I find lacking is any acknowledgment of the relativity of all forms of suffering and their opposites, such that the utter eradication of one pole entails the extirpation of the other. That's to say, for me at least, suffering has value and its total elimination would be misguided. In terms of the quality of experience, a good moment is only good relative to a moment that is less so. Also, I'm not hedonistic anyway. What I find more important than how good of a time I'm having is the vitality of the organism that I am. I could numb pain and feel incredible pleasure by taking various drugs, or go in the opposite direction like a cenobite, but these actions would tend to break down my body and lower any underlying vitality. _"Suffering is something that happens because you cling to your body and your ego."_ I'm not so sure I get what clinging to the body entails. From my understanding, I _am_ a body, not something riding around inside one. Maybe I don't even want to get the secret, though, since my project isn't to anathematize or eliminate suffering but to accept it as just one necessary aspect of existence. Anyway, good post - very interesting even if I don't agree with everything.
@@o.o5816 "What I appreciate in this perspective is the point that suffering is an inevitable consequence of existing as a functioning human." No, this is not what Buddhism claims. Suffering arouses from ignorance - by seeing the world, life and self incorrectly you are suffering. Enlightenment is seeing world and life as it truly is, and in such existence there is still pleasure (which doesn't really matter because all pleasure is fleeting and ultimately doesn't matter but there still is pleasure for enlightened beings). Seeing world as it truly is is being permanently constantly aware that you are not your body, not your brain, not your soul, not your spirit, not even your mind understood as object but rather the activity of living itself. You are a verb not a noun basically. Also viewing all things happening to you just as neutral events that just happen and are not inherently good or bad - so that enlightened beings do not judge things that world gives them. "What I find lacking is any acknowledgment of the relativity of all forms of suffering and their opposites, such that the utter eradication of one pole entails the extirpation of the other." It is very interesting that in modern day Buddhism is showered with criticism of that kind and yet in the ages past nearly nobody in India nor China did thrown such arguments against Buddhism and trust me a lot of people in India and China thrown counterarguments against Buddhism (just not about that). It is quite intuitive to me because... why would eradication of suffering eradicate all pleasure? Like... it does require some special philosophical theory about pleasure and suffering to constitute such belief (that you just can't have the good without the bad because?), a theory that was not held through most of history. "That's to say, for me at least, suffering has value and its total elimination would be misguided." Suffering isn't necessary for humans to survive. It just necessarily arise from the kind of mind that majority of humanity has, that is mind riddled with attachments. "In terms of the quality of experience, a good moment is only good relative to a moment that is less so." Such is philosophical theoretical conjecture. Actual empirical data gathered by asking enlightened people shows that their existence is quite nice and pleasant, way more pleasant than before they had their spiritual enlightenment. "What I find more important than how good of a time I'm having is the vitality of the organism that I am. I could numb pain and feel incredible pleasure by taking various drugs, or go in the opposite direction like a cenobite, but these actions would tend to break down my body and lower any underlying vitality." The enlightened do not think about their vitality, do not think about the state of their body, do not worry that aging is going to make them sick, do not worry that they might die and yet they usually do not partake in any dangerous activities even though they do not think about self preservation. As one (this time actually Daoist, not Buddhist) master once said "You should not think about bad food as bad nor about good food as good. You should eat the good food and discard the bad food without judgment". I feel that just like majority of people your reaction is going to be "but you just can't do that". People very frequently object to Buddhist teachings by saying that Buddhist advice is impractical, wrong or just anti-life because you can't actually follow that advice because it's impossible ect. Like folks feel like Star Wars prequel trilogy is some kind of marvelous critique against Buddhism because it shows how impractical Yodas advises about emotional control are when Anakin just fell in love. All of this "It's impossible" think arouses from not knowing what sitting cross-leged with mind focused on breath can do to human mind. If you practice meditation daily and correctly you are going to attain altered states of awareness and with practice you are going to became capable of achieving and maintaining these states of altered awareness even outside meditation as you are doing your duties. If it is impossible to "think in the way Buddha told people to" it's because it requires mind training through meditation. Also when you are in meditation you are likely to just "realize" that you are not your body nor your mind but the process of living ect. you are going to realize that it's silly to worry about anything and instead you are just going to act cautiously without worrying. We do not need to feel fear in order to not act haphazardly. "I'm not so sure I get what clinging to the body entails. From my understanding, I am a body, not something riding around inside one." You are something happening in connection and contact with your body. You do not ride it, you are the riding. I agree with the more secular view that destruction of the body means that you are no longer happening but that doesn't mean that you are the body or the brain or the soul or the spirit. The necessity of suffering is not absolute. It's not necessary in order to have sensations or to experience pleasure. It's just that when our desires are fulfilled and we are in a place where we wished to be we then want something else. When we achieve that something else then we wish for more or something different. When we are fed, well slept and aren't thirsty we start to crave to be safe and not endangered with death or future violations of our needs. When we are safe we want to be accepted by a group, we are social animals so we crave belonging, a sense of community. When we have community we wish for being respected, for being important, for being exemplar, for being above the rest of our community. We wish to be nobel laureates or furry artists making great porn or top influencers followed by millions or world-renowned doctors or video game designers making masterpieces for ages like Toby Fox or be CEO of some big corporation. When people are on top they seek some other top to be on. Human mind is endlessly seeking if it is muddled with ignorance. Only through enlightenment, spiritual realization can we be free from our needs, otherwise we endlessly seek with always being unhappy. The only ways to real happiness is either enlightenment or being brain in a vat with proper neural stimulators controlling us to only feel bliss and no pain. Otherwise you might survive and even live long, have the "vitality" that you care about, but you won't be happy.
@@AleksoLaĈevalo999 "You should not think about bad food as bad nor about good food as good. You should eat the good food and discard the bad food without judgment" i love that 😂 My spirituality is mostly informed by mystical Christianity, but it comes to similar conclusions
heh, nondualist here and yeah, "verbing, not a noun" is a condensed phrase we've used to remind ourself at odd moments. love how that's a thing. Ever play Slay the Princess? We want to propose the term "Breaking the Fifth Wall" for what that experience did for us. Not so much reminding us that we're the audience or even a player outside a microcosmic object of media, but that we're also one in this drama we call "Real Life." Oh yeah, also that part in "A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood" where Mr. Rogers makes eye contact with the camera for like a full minute during that zazen meditation in the diner. The ever-loving Being Seen of it all.
basically the short explanation is that the cenobites are not demons and they do not come to punish the ones that open the box...they come to REWARD the openers with new and more extreme sensations and even state in the first two that pleasure and pain is indistinguishable.
I feel like the "pleasure and pain is indistinguishable" bit falls a little short. They are absolutely distinguishable in degrees and in a vacuum, triggered by different physical processes. The complex system that is the human neurological and nerve structures leaves open the door for the simultaneous processing of multiple competing inputs. That euphoria or bliss in the face of pain is a defense mechanism. One can trigger the other and they can occur simultaneously but they are most certainly unique sensations.
@@kylegonewild i know. i just mention it because it relates to one of the catchphrases for the cenobites. but like main point i was trying to make is that that the box is meant to be an invitation for people seeking more extreme and otherworldly "pleasures" but geared specifically for masochists
I used to have a self harm problem and I used the really bad self harm forums. There's a few people there who have reached an almost celebrity status for just doing it really badly, carving out entire pieces of fat and somehow surviving (for a time at least) and doing it again next week to themselves. So I believe that limit experiences are real in a very physical visceral chemical sense, in which the brain is so fickle and malleable from trauma or even chance that it can actually break and begin to enjoy(or at least pursue) what others would call insane. So to me, the cenobites are less like BDSM and more like shtwt or something
The first time I watched hellraiser was before I got clean from self harm and that's definitely how I read the cenobites too. Ironically(??), I was also getting into horror for similar reasons to why I was cutting -- I was depressed and emotionally numb and seeking out anything that could make me feel something
Your point about deliriants is insanely poignant - diphenhydramine experiences are simply not pleasurable in any way whatsoever. Once, and then never again for 99.5% of people. There is literally not a single pleasurable element to the experience. It's pure terror distilled. Meth abuse can create that unbridled terror, plenty other drugs can but these are untoward and unsought side-effects. I only have experience with two deliriants, datura and DPH, but that's enough to go on to be honest. For most commonly available deliriants, the confusion, sense of displacement and "untowardness" of everything as well as things like entities speaking to you and disappearing, or insects crawling out of your... your everything, that IS the single side-effect these people are chasing. Who would continue to seek OTC sleeping pills to eat an entire packet of them? I thought they simply had something so disturbed inside them that being in any altered state of mind was preferable - perhaps they have no other access to other drugs. Yet, plenty did. Plenty were of an age where they could buy alcohol (18 in my country). This video and your secondary comment made me see they were chasing the limit experience of transcendental fear, pure terror itself. It's a step beyond what my s/h was doing - creating sensation in the absence of sensation. It's seeking the worst sensation possible, in a reliable and repeatable manner. Death by a thousand cuts is not repeatable. DPH abuse is infinitely repeatable - until you send yourself into a psychosis. The DPH delirium is so gripping, so intense, so real that it's hyperreal and becomes the most acutely bizarre and horrifying experience you could've had. The unadulterated terror creates transcendental suffering: a limit experience. (It's sad to see that these self-harm enablement spaces that I saw damage my fellow patients 15 years ago, are now flourishing in places like Twitter. I wish you the best of mental and physical health)
@@AdamOwenBrowningthat’s an odd take, I require a minimum of 400mg Diphenhydramine just to sleep at night because without it I can’t. At all. The insomnia combined with night terrors due to PTSD prevent rest. For me, diphenhydramine feels like a warm, fuzzy hug that slowly powers my brain down like turning off a computer until I reach the point of complete mental retardation and fall into a sleep that’s representative of a coma. Never hallucinations, never itching, just blissfully losing touch with mental faculties until they cease completely.
Thr 2022 remake really felt like it GOT the cenobites for me, the way pinhead seemed actually Confused by the lead rejecting the agony they offer, leviathan being a angelic devine light, the chatterer readying himself for dismemberment with seeming bearly suppresed anticipation..
I might also add a dash of Faustian bargaining into the mix. Particularly concerning Frank’s expectations of sensual rewards for going to such great lengths to locate and solve the lament configuration.
Pain is the most beautiful thing you will ever feel. Because as long as you can feel pain you are alive. I speak from experience. In 2004 I was struck by an RPG. I lost enough blood that I should not have had the blood pressure to stand up-( that’s a story in and of itself) I quit counting after 763 holes of various sizes. When you don’t know if you’re alive or dead focus on the pain. If you can feel the pain you’re still alive.
There's this novel written by Chuck Palahniuk called "Diary". In it, the concept of pain and suffering as a means to achieve spiritual and artistic enlightenment is very well expressed. The main character was a woman who was being surreptitiously manipulated into creating amazing works of painted art by the wealthy quasi-royalty of a small island by causing her pain, suffering and tragic loss.
Whoa, that's the only book of his I own, and in all probability, the last (physical?) one I've read since 2017. My spark had gone from an eleven to a zero over the course of a few years and I was looking for... something. I stopped halfway through, when her muse returned and she was bursting with energy again. I wanted to save that part for once I too was at that place again. But maybe now, the moment is right to finish reading it. Thanks.
Once you realize you're not supposed to feel pain, there's nothing to be afraid of anymore. Scp 5000. I don't know, but the tittle made me remember that line.
In late 2017, I developed fibromyalgia, which I genuinely believe is the closest to a limit experience the human body *can* actually get without outside incitement-- where every physical sense, quite literally is pain-- you taste it, electrically, it dances behind your eyes to be projected as a lens over everything you see, and you are *changed* because yes, if it continues long enough your link between "pleasure" and "pain" blurs to raw Sensation. Having been writing my entire life I came out of it feeling a bit more equipped to *attempt* to describe it than most but like, your body can just *do that* to you, for no reason at all. I'm not the person I was, and I don't mean now because I'm immune-compromised and in "pain" all the time now. There is pain and there is Sensation. "Angels to some, demons to others" Sensation is transformation. I had such a greater appreciation for Hellraiser as a story post-diagnosis: having been to that edge and knowing by how they look at you that the people you love no longer recognize you, that you have been transformed. Some people with my condition scramble to salvage something of themselves: the fabled **before**. "Before I was sick" "before I got Covid" -- you see this in conversations around Long Covid especially. People who were perfectly healthy begging for a "cure" instead of bending to the change, the transformation and yes, the limitation of your own ability to understand what has happened to you. It's a fascinating thing to watch play out with people, and as a society that is now so demographically different in terms of health. I wonder if anyone else, like me, found comfort in certain aspects of Hellraiser as a story, post-auto immune diagnosis.
Had a similar experience with Ringu, with Sadako as the archetype of The Prisoner. Chronic fatigue had us for years, but it was obscure to any doctor we spoke to. Come 2020, suddenly the world becomes a macrocosm to our particular brand of invisible suffering, all trapped and isolated. Then we discovered the bottom of the well is an entrance to the Labyrinth, and all its strange wisdom. Oh yeah, then it got infinitely weird when one of the cenobites in the 2022 film was called The Gasp. A name we'd chosen for ourself a year prior. Now that I recall that, I'm really interested in watching this video.
I wrote an essay during a painful health crisis about how extreme pain seems to slow or eliminate the perception of time for myself and others. I have wondered if that is why heaven or hell are reported to be infinite and eternal.
10:47 - Not having a reaction to such a scene isn't a sign of stoicism, it's a sign of indifference. And indifference is the death of empathy. Stoicism and pseudo-stoicism; The former is an idea that one may skip from all stages of grief immediately to acceptance, while the latter is yet another disguise of the idea that it's unhealthy to show emotion, because it makes you "weak." Bottling up emotions for too long causes problems, one of which are people that begin to hate the world for it, as they feel victimized.
Okay listen Hellraiser 1 has been my number one favourite movie since I was 14 and that was 26 years ago. Hellraiser had a defining and revealing effect on my sexuality and personal philosophy. I met Clive Barker and talked to him and got to express my heartfelt gratitude for creating Hellraiser and he accepted it graciously and in return genuinely and from his heart thanked me for expressing it. It has been a long-ass time since I have considered that there might be anything new that I missed about Hellraiser, or even that most people would understand the things that I understood about it. Not to be like "I'm a very special boy" or anything but basically Hellraiser (and the novella) is a thing that has been simultaneously preciously personal to me and remarkably misunderstood by others throughout my entire life. Long story short, wowee wow very good video, thank you for making it.
I can’t believe you didn’t bring up the French movie Martyrs from 2008. Spoilers for the movie below: Martyrs is a fantastic, harrowing film that starts as a thriller body-horror/home invasion movie that completely left turns into psychological horror about torturing a young woman until she enters a sublime state to reveal the secrets of Nirvana and the universe. A goal that is achieved and, once heard, immediately causes the listener to kill herself. It’s fantastic and ties so well to the points in this video.
Martyrs was... it was too much for me. I genuinely wish I could unsee it. I appreciate what they were going for, but I'd like that movie to leave my brain.
I think to be afraid of falling, is to imagine yourself stepping off the high place you're standing on, and recoiling from that thought. For as pointless and outdated as a lot of Freudian specifics are, he was right to notice the fact that accompanying a fear of falling is a desire to leap from the ledge. The cenobites are the manifest form of the knowledge that you cannot feel flight without leaping to your death, that implicit in absolute transcendence is absolute change. We fear them, at least partially, because they are not truly unrecognizable - while they clearly stand on the other side of a threshold we cannot comprehend, what SCARES us is that we feel something implicit to our human consciousness, expressed by them. That is, what scares us is that they are not alien, that they are voice to the question of why pain (not just physical) is such a fundamental characteristic of life, the question of whether pain has some deeply human meaning, and their answer is a booming "YES". If pain doesn't 'mean' anything, then we don't have to accept it, we can flee it or subdue it or wallpaper over it, but the cenobites are familiar to the part of us that recoils from the thought of suffering being such a central part of life that it should be embraced. Like a fear of heights, that recoiling is only there because some deeper, instinctive part of us, actually considers the possibility of embracing and facing up to that pain in the first place, the impulse to fly even if it literally means falling to our deaths. To be glib, what is scary about the cenobites is that they AREN'T the ones pushing us to jump. We find them scary, personal, rather than alien, because we make the desire to jump all by ourselves.
also the very first opening scene of hellbound heart is a mental monologue of the guy while trying to open the box and basically demonstrating that those who know of the lament's configuration and actively seek it out usually already know what's going to happen if they succeed and anticipate it but also underestimate how far the cenobites are going to go with their "reward".
People fear the cenobites because they represent an irreversible, permanent change that will shatter your current reality forever; one that is inescapable and forces you to feel its presence at all times. Of course you want greater thresholds in life, but most people want to return to some sense of sameness, because reality, ugly as it is, grounds us. It's something we're always trying to escape, yet we always want to return to at our leisure.
@@AltairEgo1 also its because they go beyond what is acceptable. the cenobites are a fantasy depiction of a real world lifestyle that is taken to such an extreme degree that isn't possible in this current reality. it's all depends on the individual asking how far is too far, even for those that actually want it. and there are plenty that want it
@@gusty7153 I know of one character, I think in the comics, who fell in love with a cenobite. He enjoyed the torture and formed an attachment to a female cenobite.
The attempt to repackage stoicism as a remedy to the tragedies of modern life kind of reminds me of the from Mike Flanagan's Fall of the House of Usher: "we said it was about soothing the world's pain. That's the biggest lie we ever told. You can't eliminate pain. There's no such thing as a painkiller. Imagine if we put that on the bottle I bet I still could have sold it"
Oh lord, those later movies. I was never scared of the Cenobytes in the first movie, the real monsters were the humans involved. I watched ot when I was a kid 25 years ago and I'm still freaked out by Julia and Frank. What an interesting video, thank you! ❤
Christianity does not talk about punishment for every action or that life has this big meaning We were meant for more, but we can reject this and go our own way, from dust came, dust to return Free will plays a big factor, and you can choose to live in flesh, live and die, or you can choose to try to reclaim the lost inheritance in Christ Anyone who tries to preach about Hell is NOT a Christian, because the scriptures very clearly contradict such a notion
@@khankorpofficial so what basis do you have to claim that hell isn’t real that’s any more founded than what idk, the original church created by Jesus himself says on the matter? Hell is described as very real in multiple passages.
I feel like Hellraiser 2022 was what I was finally waiting for. It's different from the first 2 but I appreciate it as it's own work. The addiction metaphor really spoke to me, and there was this constant sense of "faux-resistance" from the drug-dealer analogue characters. Both the Cenobites and the other villains have that kinda "noooo, doooon't, stoooooop" vibe to them and it's so good on rewatch.
I feel like the idea of the Lament Configuration granting evil-jeenie-style wishes if you feed enough people to it kinda undermines the ethos of cenobites as established by Barker. In the original novel, at least, the box attracted people with a deep-seated, selfish desire, regardless if they were actively seeking cenobites out. Cenobites were not an evil dragon, waiting for fresh virgins - they were fae, claiming anyone who dares glimpse their form into their endless revelry. Not to mention that Riley was one of the most hateable horror protagonists I've seen in a while. The moment her brother got claimed by the Box she grew from unlikable to nigh unforgivable. I almost couldn't properly enjoy the film because I hated that little cunt so much. That fact that in the end she gets off scott free while people who were trying to save her sorry ass have either suffered a fate worse than death or came close to it really put a damper on an otherwise well-made film. "Why, of course a little survivor's guilt is on par with unimaginable torture" my ass...
@@borealsullivan5486 the question that was asked in the 2022, at least in my opinion, was how far are you willing to go for enlightenment. The enlightenment the Cenobites bring is through pain and tribulation. This is why they were disappointed in Riley at the end. She rejects there offer and will never know what could have been and now she is left with the not knowing. Voight on the otherhand doesn't undetstand the "gift" the Cenobites offer until he chooses "power" and quite literally ascendes to become a Cenobite himself and understands.
@@erwin669 That sounds good on paper, but the fact that cenobites are perfectly willing to "enlighten" unwilling and often innocent participants makes the final conclusion sound hollow. It's arguably what makes cenobites in the original movie appear more evil compared to the novel. That is, their relation to Kirstie. In the novel she was Frank and Julia's frumpy friend that harboured a secret crush on Frank and resented Julia. That's why she was drawn to the box - she just didn't have the state of mind to accept the cenobites' gift, just like Frank. While in the movie it appears that cenobites take anyone who solves the puzzle box, which also makes for a continuity error between the first movie and the second, where Pinhead suddenly states that It's intent that matters, not the hands that opened the box.
@@borealsullivan5486 I'd argue that Riley (in the remake) is prefectly willing, she's just not aware how willing she is. She is doing drugs and letting her life fall apart because she doesn't find meaning in her life. Had it not been people she cared about being sacrificed to the Cenobites she would have taken them up on their offer to go deeper. The Cenobites are neither good or evil, they just are. Kristy, as far as the movie goes, was more than willing. She eventually becomes a Cenobite herself in Barker's continueity
@@erwin669 I guess it was the visceral feeling of how horribly unfair it all was to people around her that ticked me off. Drag Me to Hell gave me the same feeling. But because in DMTH there was only ever one victim of the curse it left me with a sinking depression, while in Hellraiser remake most of the "deaths" that occur are arguably Riley's fault it instead made me angry at her in particular. And she's lucky that in the remake being taken by cenobites doesn't seem to be an eternal damnation like in the original series, otherwise it would've impacted my impression of the film much more negatively 😅
Being against tattoos is more of an evangelical Protestant / modern conservative Catholic thing. Christianity historically was either ambivalent or fully accepting of tattoos. In the Catholic Church during the Crusades, it was ruled in the Council of Northumberland that religious tattoos were permissible, and even "praiseworthy". At the time, many Catholic knights and pilgrims made use of tattoos, especially at the completion of a pilgrimage to the Catholic shrines in the Holy Land. Some Catholic military orders, such as the Knights of St. John of Malta, sported tattoos to show their allegiance. It was commonly used as a symbol that you would not give up your faith if captured by Islamic armies. Orthodox Coptic Christians who live in Egypt commonly tattoo themselves with the symbols of Coptic crosses on their right wrists for similar historical reasons. From there, the tradition spread throughout Eastern Christian communities such as the Ethiopian, Armenian, Syrianand Maronite Churches. Catholic and Orthodox Croats in Bosnia utilised tattooing of crosses for perceived protection against forced conversion to Islam and enslavement during the Ottoman occupation of Bosnia. This has continued into modern times. Tattoos are also traditionally done on pilgrims who complete a visit to Jerusalem
@BrutalPuppy I don't know if this comment is an attempt at some old-fashioned eastern european racism but Orthodoxy is the second-largest religious denomination in Croatia. There are ethnic Croats who are Orthodox and ethnic Serbs who are Catholic.
I'm a Christian, and I'm not against people getting tattoos, I just don't want to have tattoos. Not because of pain or anything like that, but in terms of money. I already have a weapons addiction, I don't need to add tattoos to the equation
Yeah because people don't use them now for the purposes of meaningful art, they use it to destroy their bodies and future prospects. It's just meaningless post modern drivel now.
Hellraiser was always one of my absolute favorite guilty pleasure movies; the blend of psychological horror and abstract physical horror was just so morbidly satisfying. Also; what a great fkn channel! Just found you out and already subbed, you’re doing great work!
I would be interested in seeing your take on The Godhand from Berserk. The creator of the manga, Kentaro Miura, has said they were inspired by Hellraiser but he definitely has a different philosophy regarding their purpose. It's a long but wonderful series.
The xenobytes are apostles that welcome you upon awakening the behelit/cube. Unless you can overcome the hellish forces trying to recruit you, your monstrous evolution is assured like a divine fate.
Demons to some, angels to others is an amazing line. It's been rattling around my head since the 90s. I never forgot my first showing of Hellraiser or it's sequel. I've done the required reading, with relish. I loved the books of blood, all 6. All his comic books, or at least the ones with his characters. Weave World and Imajica were most eccentric & excellent. But The Great and Secret Show never stopped effecting me. I just picked it up to read yet again and somehow (they're listening) RUclips knew and presented me with this video. I'm so happy it did. Your thoughtful and astute observations about Hellraiser & The Hellbound Heart put into words what I've always known but was unable to articulate. I'm so impressed! I can't wait to watch more of your videos. Kudos! And your cat trying to eat you? That happens to me a lot. Life is pain. Ps. I never knew Clive Barker's ties to the LGBTQ community. Mind you it never mattered to me before, and knowing it now it still doesn't matter to me. His art speaks volumes and that's all that matters. To me at any rate. I wonder if it will enhance my appreciation of his art? I look forward to finding that out. ❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🩷
I saw the cenobites as Judges, or genies. Just giving you what you want. I feel the re-make does the wish part pretty well. What are you willing to do for your wish...and that wish is just a reflection of your desire, not so much what you want. I always loved that you had to seek the Box in order to call the Cenobites. The person after the box was the monster, and the cenobites where putting order back into place.
I love this interpretation. Always hated the direct religious connections implied in various Hellraiser material. I always essentially saw cenobites the way you describe, even if i never actually put words to it myself.
This video left me speechless. I feel like few people truly understand the ideas behind Barkers creations, but you GET it, and you did an incredible job of explaining it. (I also love your dog)
11:14 exactly, violence doesn't exist in a vacuum, it's always violence from one social class unto another. (Capitalists inflict pain upon the working masses and are not subjected to any law or moral demand due to their power)
I discovered the channel through the Sound of Freedom video and now I'm watching Hellraiser analysis. That's range, right there. 😂 Keep up the good work!!
For a PG-13 take of the fusion of divinity and pain, you might look into the evolving interpretation of the goddess Loviatar in Dungeons and Dragons. Back in the original run of D&D in the eighties, Gary Gygax infused the RL mythical Finnish dark goddess Loviatar who is associated with winter and suffering with the essence of a dominatrix to create a fan classic that has endured through multiple editions and pantheons to this day. Originally starting as an obscure entry in the old school Dieties and Demigods manual, Loviatar has risen to become part of the canon pantheon of Forgotten Realms, the default long running game world of D&D. Despite being classified as Lawful Evil, the philosophy of her and her followers is that pain is a necessary part of being for the evolution of self and society. Acts of heroic altruism deny this opportunity to others and are from the goddess's point of view evil. Thus Loviatar and her followers oppose the traditionally good heroic player characters because from the goddesses's point to view the heros are the evil ones taking on the suffering of others to strengthen themselves and thus weaken the rest of the world's population who remain dependant on the heros to survive. Nothing so meta in a role playing game like recontexualizing gaining experience points as a bad thing.
It is absolutely an Asian Thing !!!! Watch "Seven years in Tibet" & understand why Brad Pitt did not get the Girl , because western & eastern philosophy are diffrent Which is why Communism took hold because in essence it agrees with the egoless life. Rather than being a stand out show off CAPITOLIST AMERICAN Stereotype..
Great analysis! The part about Georges Bataille reminded me of the movie Martyrs. If you want proof that a movie about limit experiences is not enough to keep an audience, looking at the reception of that movie is a good example.
I was going to comment about that; the photo of the high as balls guy being cut into pieces makes an appearance in the movie, and the Idea that extreme pains can bring transcendance feels very on brand for a hellraiser movie, which martyrs, at least officially, isn't. a certain character in the middle of the movie even looks rather cenobite-like.
I’m not sure by any means, but I feel like the ending for Martyrs was a big part of why it probably failed. Hellraiser implied a lot of different things about what might happen to a person after they’ve “transcended,” and while it’s not very specific or hard-rule, it definitely shows that there’s at least _an answer, that there’s not really a way to transfer knowledge of that answer without _showing_ someone, and that you’re not going to get shown the answer without _desiring_ it, even if you don’t really know what getting that desire fulfilled looks like (Frank.) it didn’t even have a Christian context in the originals. Refusing to go with the “it’s hell” route is pretty impressive for a horror movie about a painful afterlife. Martyrs didn’t do that at all, it has people who get forced to experience that transcendence, the answer isn’t about the limit experience at all, but about the secrets of the afterlife. Even worse, that secret was easily communicated when the hero explains to the villain what she sees in her final moments, and the villain commits suicide when she finally learns the secret. Whatever answer she heard, all we can read as the audience in that scene is “oh boy, that secret sure is bad, dude, amirite?” Lastly, the whole plot borrows from similar ideas to Hellraiser, but _none_ of the story really meshes well, because it’s used in a stereotypically Christian context and as a result it misses all the points Hellraiser nailed.
@@awkwardukulele6077 I don't really buy martyrs as a movie with a christian framework, aside from the villains being old white french people with money, meaning they're probably christian... the villains are looking for answers about the afterlife, but the movie is pretty vague about what that is, or even if the MC might just be plainly hallucinating. and the answer could be really bad... or really good... the thing that hints at the answer being bad news for the vilains is that she refuses to pass it on further. The fact that some of the experience can be recounted with words doesn't really diminish it since we are not privy to what's being regardless. To me the whole point is that an oral summation of a glimpse is earth shattering enough, even though it's watered down. Anyway, the fact that the people looking for answers do so by torturing proxies makes a move away from typical slasher morality (where the transgressors are usually the ones tormented), but to me it kinda fits some of the more transgressive aspects of the original hellraiser, especially regarding the absence of objective morality, but yes, I'll admit it's less palatable - martyrs certainly isn't a movie I'd want to watch again.
This is one of the best videos I have ever watched on this subject. I have read Barker since I was 13 years old, and I love that you shot down the Lovecraft/Barker similarities. One could make the same argument with King and Barker as well. Well done!
2022 was the year I started my medical transition and finally started HRT. I guess I was one of the lucky trans women who didn't get her libido killed and senses seemed to be enhanced. Colors are more vivid, more sensative to touch, actually seeing the beauty of things in the world, actually feeling emotions of the first time. I became a more sensing person and it is very hard to describe things. I kinda felt like I understood where the Cenobites were coming from because they get to experiance all of the thngs. And coming from a world where I didn't get to experiance most of the things that humans seem to do and having my own awakening I don't blame them for wanting to experiance all of the things
This is perhaps the most intelligent, profound exposition on Hellraiser I’ve seen. And I’m pretty sure I’ve watched them all. I too am a Clive Barker, Hellraiser, cenobite fan. ✌️
That was genuinely one of the best explanations I have ever heard. You precisely conveyed would I struggled to convey to many not only about Hellraiser but horror itself. I enjoy horror for its ability to challenge an explore the taboo. The existence of something that challenges worldview and perception. Whether It be the works of Clive Barker where the horrors of the human essence are made real or the cold Indifference of something beyond your comprehension made by authors like H. P. Lovecraft, horror is variable. It cannot be defined by a simple formula and once it tries to it looses it's value. The point of horror fundamentally is that it try's to shock or scare you, maybe even both. The way talented people do this can be done other than just cheap jumpscares or a cheesy ghost. The best way to create horror is to challenge the unknown. Make an audience experience something new. Clive Barker did this beautifully when he created the 1987 film. I think what he did should be preserved and studied for years to come. I know for sure the sequels could have benefited from that. Thank you for conveying that and much more. You have done amazing work!
As someone who's been involved in bdsm for a number of years, ive grown to understand that pain is very mysterious. After we get past the sexual nature involved, we start to see a deeper level immerge. Ive known people who get no sexual satisfaction from it, but instead they used pain almost as a sort of therapy. Its difficult for them to explain, but it evidently helps ithem in a very personal way. These are those you see who take their bdsm very seriously, its not a Saturday night bag of tricks for them, like it is to the more casual practitioners. Its their medicine, their therapy. These are those who have regular schedules they stick to & its truly fascinating to know such a person. The human mind is so complex.
I was in high school when the original Hellraiser was released, and it became an instant favorite. I had read a lot of Barker’s works up until then, and to this day he remains one of my favorite artists, whether in literature or in visual media. Since then, however, every time I watched the first film, I experienced a ravenous hunger for hot dogs, and I only realized the reason once I got older. Apparently, Julia Cotton isn’t the only one who finds Skinless Franks to be desirable. I apologize for that horrible joke, I’ve just been making it since around 1989 and it’s been poorly received 99.9% of the time. I really enjoyed your video though, you hit on many points that have irked me over the years due to most people misunderstanding the ideas behind The Hellbound Heart, and the nature of such things as Cenobites, pain as obstacle, journey, and goal, heaven and Hell, etc. Excellent video, and I’m happy to have subscribed to your channel. Thanks for such great insights into one of my all-time favorite stories, and I wish you all the best for the new year. (And again, sorry about the hot dog joke. 😆)
Bataille is cool, jus' remember never to go full Foucault 'cause you know what they say: never as a woman her age, never ask a man his salary, an' never ask your fave French philosopher why they signed that petition in the 70's...
@@themorbidzoo .. Lovecraft was a decent, Good person - While the kind of community Barker came from could never wrap their head's around the fact that they brought uneeded problems onto everyone by engaging in the unsafe pastimes they did. And literally ignored warnings from God. +
I am absolutely floored. As a transwoman and years long fan of this mythos, FINALLY, someone who GETS IT. The scholarship is impeccable, and I have seen/read damn near every relevant work referenced here and in Barker's oeuvre, but I actually believe you understand the appeal better than even its author. 10/10, could not possibly criticize, I don't know if I've ever felt more seen!
Being such a newbie to the concept of the Cenobite and only hearing about Pinhead from sources like Dead By Daylight, I find this analysis so well written pleasant to listen to.
I have to say this was randomly suggested to me by the Algorithm and I'm very glad it was. Your analysis of this topic was very deep and comprehensive. I really enjoyed it and the work you put into it. I don't think I've encountered something this interesting since taking philosophy in college. Thank you for doing this for us. It is greatly appreciated. Also, I love the first two movies and this really did a great job of pointing out the flaws in subsequent movies. I wish you all the best. Peace
Thank you for this. Hellraiser has long been my favorite horror franchise, despite the films' best efforts to the contrary. And it is all rooted in stuff like this - the deeper concepts and meaning. There are rules, a philosophy to it all, not just senseless "kill teenagers because they're there".
I find it either incredibly coincidental or absolutely intentional on your part to briefly show the depiction of the martyred Saint Sebastian being pierced by arrows. If you're familiar with the Japanese author Yukio Mishima, he was obsessed with this image. He himself expressed in his semi-autobiographical novel Confessions of a Mask that this image of St. Sebastian was the cause of his sexual awakening as he was aroused by it (in so many words) Mishima had a life long fixation on death, particularly ritual suicide, to the point that its argued his last act on earth was at best an act of sedition against his government, and at worst performance art in an attempt to reach that Limit Experience. I urge you to delve into his story as it is utterly fascinating. Anyhoo...this vid was so well thought out, executed and communicated. Take my sub! 😊
Yea, the pseudo-stoicism trend really rubs me the wrong way too. It rhymes of the early internet edge-lords, convincing themselves they're above everyone else because they're not _emotional_ about the social norms they decide to flout. These dweebs are often the first people to scream and shout when slightly inconvenienced too, because they don't consider anger one of these emotions. Actual stoicism is the other side of the coin to Buddhism, where one says suffering is your lack of discipline, that you should only concern yourself with that which you can control. The other says suffering is nature, and you should seek to detach from it. They're both incredibly solipsistic philosophies that promote detaching yourself from the human condition because they find it icky, basically. You could probably use either to modulate how you deal with suffering, but the idea that we should seek to control or detatch from our humanity to become _better_ is just undiagnosed mental illness and no one will ever convince me otherwise. You don't have to be ruled by your emotions to experience them, to accept them as a part of you. Being human, being flawed, vulnerable, happy, sad, angry, melancholy, afraid, wonderlusted. They're all part of the rich tapestry of our existence, denying any part of them because they're undignified or inconvenient is cowardice, pure and simple. Children turning their noses up at their medicine. Great video, Hellraiser has been one of my favourite series since I got the first 3 films on a DVD boxset when I was a teen. The imagery always struck a chord.
Great analysis. You have a wondrous mind. Thank you for sharing your perspective on Hellraiser, it allowed me to further my own thoughts what I found to be a story which had several extra layers beneath what one sees at the surface of all the morbidity and gore.
this was really interesting! I always interpreted Hellraiser as Blue and Orange morality seen through a Black and White lens. All these small petty people opening a box looking for something quantifiable on a human scale, only to be faced with creatures so evolved passed us that their extremes are unimaginably esoteric for us to grasp. It is extreme pain because our sad little human nerves can't interpret the signals of the Other in any way that does not lead to being forever changed. Very cool video
I had no idea Pinhead was portrayed by a trans woman in the new Hellraiser movie. That is so cool. Her performance was absolutely amazing, I loved every second she appeared on screen and really felt that for the first time there was an actual successor to Doug Bradley as an iconic and unforgettable Pinhead. Anyways time to binge the channel now.
Really appreciated the bit of interpretation around her in this. I don't know hellraiser stuff well and haven't seen the new one yet, but knew about Jamie from sense8. And, well, hitting a point in transition of needing to start some potentially painful stuff, so that... REALLY landed.
This was an incredibly profound take. Not simply on Clive Barker's work, but sadomasochism, metamorphosis, and the potential philosophical (even theological) ties to them. Subscribed, and look forward to seeing more of your work.
Earned a new sub. That was beautiful. As a huge philosophy nerd, weirdo and trans person... I think that you're explanation of limit experiences and the wider spectrum was quite elegant, and simply I would argue... they are one in the same. Consciousness on any level is a form of limit experience and it's just a matter of you're paying attention to that. I think you could even symbolize and theorize upon this using mathematics. Just food for thought for anyone that reads this.
Thomasin is an artist of pain, and her medium is claws.
and teeth
Incredible. SUBSCRIBED.
@@birdbrainiac yes definitely and teeth.
He has such sights to show us! 😼
There is a sound at the center of the world, Joey, a sound like adorable kitty claws through flesh.
Your cat biting the shit out of your fingers when you were talking bout humans willingly putting themselves through pain was masterful, 10/10, love their acting choices.
So perfect, to me cats transcend human moral visions in amazing ways. One moment I see my cat in ecstatic bliss at the simple pleasure of having a good stretch in a sunny spot. In another moment I see it's intense delight in drawing out the suffering of a mouse it has caught for as long as possible, giving it brief moments to hope it has escaped only to recapture it.
...I just call my cat "You little psychopath..."
That's the whole thing with furry purry bitey clawey cats, pain and pleasure indistinguishable. Cats are gods, trying to teach us.
@@BretRBoulter particularly when you consider that biting is their way of kissing
You know, there’s this interesting thing about male cats… And it really sucks for female cats.
“We have such sights to show you.”
It’s right there on the tin, really. That’s not a threat.
It’s a *_joyous invitation._*
Yeah for sure, they’re angels. They’re just.. yknow. Really, really kinky.
Every hellraiser piece of literature ends with a happy ending when you think about it.
The real horror of Hellraisers was never "These people exist, and _they might come for you~"_ It was always supposed to be a more existential "There are people who _want this,_ and with the right circumstance, it _could be you."_
Yes.
Maybe the real existential horror is the friends we made along the way
@@likelovehahawow Freaky friends
temptation
The scariest thing of all is knowing what you really want
One of the things I disliked most about some of the sequels was studios making the cenobites basically cookie cutter slasher villains instead of them being creatures just doing their job and only going after those who seek them.
One of my favourite scenes in the series is in Hellbound when Pinhead stops the cenobites going after the mute girl because it wasn't her who was actually seeking them despite her solving the box.
That's my favorite scene too!
Same. I liked how it once again highlighted that they followed rules, not killed indiscriminately.
They cenobites are poster children fir lawful evil (or should be )
When I was at theatre school in the early 90's, I was assigned a prop making task of carving a wooden dagger from a piece of 1" x 4" pine. We were given a template to trace the design onto the wood, and after that we were on our own. This bears relevance.
My good friend was a huge Clive Barker fan, and had just purchased a copy of Weaveworld in anticipation of Barker's appearance at a local book store for a signing & sales . I stood in line beside him as he had his book signed, and then suddenly I was there, facing him, with nothing in my hands. Clive looked at me and i reached into my backpack and produced the piece of wood, with the dagger drawn on it.
"Never signed one of these before.", he offered.
I'd like to think that, all these years later, he still hasn't been asked to sign a small piece of wood with a dagger drawn on it.
That's all.
sweeeeet
Well, that's utterly charming - well done 😃
My car's door handle broke off in the winter when my brother was trying to get it open, the door being frozen shut. Then in the summer I was at a music festival with the chance to meet one of my favorite bands but having brought nothing to be signed, so I presented them with the door handle. I still have it somewhere.
That's so awesome! I'm a huge Clive Barker fan, Weaveworld is probably my second most favorite book by him, Imajica is absolutely the first. But wow, what an incredible memory to have. I met George Romero, (also George RR Martin but that was way back in 2004), and getting to meet Barker would probably tie with Romero.
@@lindseysgreencanvasI’ve got a copy of Imajica on my shelf! Haven’t gotten around to reading it yet, unfortunately, but I will one day
Legitimately impressed at your ability to read script while being mauled by a tiny monster. Bravo.
Cats are the true horrors of the world
Ah, the suffering!
@@markanthony1004 No, cats are the cute horrors of the world.
"When you live in pain for so long, it becomes familiar. Familiarity is comforting. And so, I find comfort in my despair."
The line that sums up the cenobites is ‘explorers on the edge of experience.’ Future Hellraisers need to really meditate on that line.
the new one kinda did, I love how she portrays Pinhead
I agree. And I agree the new one leans more into that.
Right with the re make's "`Enough` is a myth"
"Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die."
Hellraiser is a divine comedy, if you think about it.
Now I'm thinking of the cellar doors on Russian Doll. It *was* extremely funny watching Natasha Lyonne tumble face-first to her death like "Those things are a menace!"
My favorite Mel Brooks quote
From that point of view that would make "Jackass" Saturday morning cartoons for children.
I would argue comedy is also about details, how in depth you go into it.
I've been saying Hellraiser is basically dark comedy for years but everyone looks at me like I'm fucking crazy.
One thing I always found interesting was that Leviathan, the Cenobites' boss, wasn't a god of evil, pain, or death, but of order. Typically in mythology, gods of order are seen as "good" deities who are placed as gods to be followed and worshipped. But in Hellraiser, the ultimate "big bad", so to say, isn't an entity that destroys structures, but one that maintains them
There's nothing quite like the tyranny of stasis.
If chaos is unlimited potential, order is the complete lack of it. The point of existence where nothing new can ever be.
Yeah, there's plenty of evil order in fiction.
Faustian bargains and hell's hierarchy are very orderly in them ye oldeny books and tales.
Skynet represents absolute order.
The Machine God from World of Darkness does as well. (As do plenty of other equally horrific Machine Gods in fantasy/Sci-Fi.)
The Borg from Star Trek and the entity from the Movie "Virus" are great examples of how horrific order can be when it's forced upon us chaotic little fleshbags.
I also think The Cube, with all it's _seeming_ gore trap "randomness" represents order too, completely uncaring and beyond our reasoning just as equally extreme chaos (like Event Horizon) would be.
Exactly, in addition Leviathan kind of has an extra terrestrial element to it. And yes, hells chain of command is about obedience and control not chaos and freedom. Hell is not shown to be a burning lake and Leviathan likes humans to make it's vintage torture devices. In addition, the cenobites, therefore, act like draconian prison wardens. It's a macabre prison system.
Lawful Evil is still evil.
thats because Life is chaotic. The cenobite God is anti-Life. anti-chaos. It's actually quite beautiful. Clive being a homosexual has a profound understanding of his homosexuality. I feel as though he was making a very controversial statement but he does it so well - it flies right over most peoples head . I believe- he s stating that religion is anti-life , anti-freedom. constraining life to order, warps it into something that is grotesque and abominable in attempt to ascend the flesh.
"... if you're frightened of dying and you're holding on you'll see devils tearing your life away, but if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels freeing you from the earth. It's just a matter of how you look at it."
“The only thing that burns in hell is the part of you that won't let go of your life: your memories, your attachments. They burn them all away, but they're not punishing you, they're freeing your soul.”
― Meister Eckhart
--- Jacob's Ladder
I’ve honestly always liked the IDEA and world building of Hellraiser more than the movies themselves, including the original ones. This analysis is just reinforcing in me that there is an absolutely amazing story waiting to be told when the marriage of all of these points come together. Many of them have each element, but I still don’t think we’ve quite gotten the best Hellraiser movie.
I would agree but then I watched the newest one. ❤
Totally agree! Currently my favorite “version” of Hellraiser exists in Peter Mohrbacher’s concept art for the 2022 film. Mohrbacher is known for his Angelarium series, an artbook based around its surreal posthuman figures, so he kind of got a headstart in conceiving what the angels of Hellraiser might eventually reach. I especially really like the Cenobite’s he’s drawn with completely hollowed out skulls- the idea that a person might be able to have their brain scooped out and yet still be alive is just so grotesquely fascinating in that perfect Hellraiser way.
I think the biggest issue with how people write the Cernobites is they forget the pretty damn important fact that they seek unlimited pain AND pleasure. They seek extreme sensations of all sorts, not just the negative ones.
Agreed, no one not even bdsm people who have a safe word just in case, seek complete Neverending pain. I think it was lost that these people in the movie want sensations that one cannot achieve on earth. The ultimate high, with the deepest low.
Totally. I think anyone who thinks the cenobytes are evil doesn't understand Clive Barker. He relates to the monstrous. It's always people who are truly evil in his lore
@@amandamarinovich6164 Thats because Clive Barker is a victim of post modern deconstruction, inversion and relativism. His metaphysics, theology and understanding of philosophy are not on the same level as his writing skills. My favorite irony is that the cenobites are clearly inspired by what was going on in the deviant bdsm gay scene of that time. I know he probably didn't see it that way back then but the fact that he chose to map this particular facet onto the demons exposes something disturbing about the directed effort to attack the nuclear family by the way of transgressive influences enabled by weak permissive personalities (Julia) entering in through the backdoor . Hellraiser was never more relevant than it is today. Unintentionally Barkers old work makes him look like a great christian writer who was struggling with himself
Then why instead of torture they don't put bigger sexual organs.?
@@NoOne-uh9vu You are bonkers, man. Do you want to get fro-yo later?
The moment you started tackling the concept of Cenobites NOT being demons, you'd won. Immediate sub. This was beautiful. Definitely going to go on a bingewatch of your content.
The focus on sensation is what most people don't get. That's why the remakes ending made me emotional: the cenobites are appalled because the protagonist chooses to bear the guilt for her actions. A being purely bent on pain and suffering should be satisfied, but they're not because guilt is purely intellectual, it's a self imposed torture born of thought.
I’m a tattoo artist and when you mention how pain is part of the appeal you were 100% correct. My most loyal and consistent clients are the people who generally enjoy the process of the pain. I like to think it’s a spiritual experience for tattooer and the person being tattooed. Something humans have done as long as we’ve existed and I feel blessed to get to participate in it. The only art that is as permanent as our lives. Very cool video I really enjoyed it 💖
As someone who has a good few palm size bangers, and two larger ones that were much longer sessions (7 and 9 hrs) I definitely found the longer sessions had moments of disassociation. I am hesitant to call it transcenance more like my brain fully accepting the pain, but yeah, I definitely enjoyed the longer sessions, and I definitely love getting tattooed. I had a full back piece done in one session and i felt like a different person by the end of it...maybe that's just PTSD? 😅
i hate the pain in longer session, but somehow it's tolerable pain. can't explain it, haven't felt any enjoyment though yet lol. arms felt only relaxing, also they were quite fast to make even when big @@teenagebottlerobert
lol my first 2 tattos are right on my left ribcage. that part of my body is covered in ink. my 3rd one is directly on top of my sternum, dead center. 4th is right below that one, and my 5th, but not final tattoo stretches from collarbone to collarbone and runs across my upper chest. the whole pain and identity argument is absolutely relatable.
I have a shirt that says "it's all about the pain, the ink and jewelry are just souvenirs". I identify with that.
Cringe
I always hate when people call them demons, you really hit the nail on the head. I always describe them as BDSM angels because (originally) they don't have malicious intent. Their intent comes off as malicious to _us_ but isn't _inherently_ malicious, they bring the euphoria and horror of where extreme pain and pleasure meet, they don't see this as bad, its neutral at least, beautiful at best. I love love love how you talked about Jamie being cast as Pinhead and why she was perfect casting. It's something I haven't really been able to articulate. Thank you so much for recognizing the important influence of Clive's Queerness on Hellraiser, so many people don't take that into account even though its a pivotal part of why Hellraiser _is_
In the words of the lead cinobite priest: "we are explororers in the furthest reaches of experience. Angels to some, Demons to others."
I think there's even a little more sort of dry humour in The Hellbound Heart, when Frank summons the Cenobites but clearly misunderstood what they're actually all about, and before they get to work on him it almost feels like they're side-eyeing each other as if to say "Did this idiot get a wrong number?". They do make sure to ask "Hey, are you sure?" and Frank's just grasping at straws. It feels like visitors from a hidden plane of sensation giving a collective shrug, I love it. Kafkaesque, maybe? I'm not as critically literate as I'd like to be
They are deranged creatures that think they are right…but most people think they’re right… Also did people see the last HellRaiser??
Ha, nail on the head.
Exactly Pinhead is seen as a villain but Clive Barker wrote the Cenobites as neither good or evil, they just are.
When an amazing analysis is so deserving picked up the by the real god - the algorithm - I'm thankful. Thanks for such profoundly insightful analysis.
11:20 - Holy shit. Subscribed. Hellraiser is my favorite horror franchise because of its explorations in pain, even when in painfully bad movies. I deal with severe chronic pain and there's no escaping it or justifying it, there's just dealing with it or not.
But I can, and do, use it as a sort of running tally proving I'm still here and I try to use it as fuel for my art. It's part of that Jungian Magnum Opus, I just happen to have a fairly large helping of a Piece of the Void.
"One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star..."
Thomasin going absolute goblin mode and you asking them "Can you not?" was hysterical
The part right after when the kitty touched her face was hilarious
@@LodyDudeLike, "Okay, sorry mom."
@@Aster_Risk 😂 love it
Great analysis. I think the only thing I would add is that at least in The Hellbound Heart the cenobites seem to be pioneers of sensation who left behind a guidepost. It says, "if you've reached your limit on what you feel you can sense come this way for the next step." The problem is that pleasure and pain are on a spectrum of sensation. In one sense (pardon) pain is simply overstimulation, too much pleasure. The Cenobites are just able to go farther than humans can on that spectrum but they are happy to let anyone who wants to follow them as far as they can go. But no take backs.
So Julia's story and Frank's story are "how far are you willing to go to get the thing you think you want only to realize that you got what you asked for, not what you wanted." Kind of a Monkey's Paw deal.
nice of them to use safe words, sorta
People open the box the cenos say hello
@@918_xDx "Man I really love little physical puzzles and trinkets. There's something satisfying about solving them."
"Ah, you've solved the puzzle box so you tire of the drudgery of your limited existence and desire to be flayed and hanged from meat hooks!"
"...no."
Pausing the video two minutes in to breathe a sigh of relief whenever someone acknowledges that the franchise lost its way with part three, not seven or ten.
Hellraiser is my favorite cosmic horror. Because unlike alot of it, it doesn’t just ape Lovecraft’s visual styles and themes. Clive Barker actually considered his own fears and philosophies and made something that fit into that.
Lovecraft was terrified of the concept of an indifferent universe, one that was beyond his comprehension, just as he was afraid of rot and oceanic creatures, and that all informed his writing.
Barker made a universe that is dictated by pain and the blending of sensation beyond all reason. Brutal order and hedonistic stagnation in a way that is not indifferent, but *joyous.* The cenobite are only concerned with who chooses to join them, they themselves were once humans who sought out this edge of sensation. It’s a different form of cosmic existentialism and I love it for that.
Good comment but I wouldn't consider Hellraiser cosmic horror because it isn't cosmic in scale, even if the cenobites and their realm are kind of lovecraftian.
I've never been a fan of Lovecraft personally
Tentacles, people going mad
I find it rather tedious but that's just me
“sensation is the god that supersedes all gods”
amazing poetry of words here, and incredibly profound. every religion when stripped to its bare parts deals with humanity’s relationship to sensation. whether we are chasing ecstasy, running from suffering, or trying to rid ourselves completely of our emotional response to either, it all comes down to our sensations.
woah
Not really. Some religions are about man’s happiness, which is different than pleasure or sensation.
Hedonism.
@@Luci-rv1hlnot at all but okay
@@ghoulishgoober3122 lol go look it up
I adore Clive Barkers work and am always saddened by how he’s not often talked about more widely in horror circles despite the amount of media that has been inspired by his works;
Thank you for this break down- your thematic analysis in this video and several others is fantastic!🦔🦔
This has me thinking how so many of his movies end up going down the spiral of become VOD, or Straight To DVD Bad Sequels.
Wishmaster, Candyman, Hellraiser, etc.
Each of these films are beautifully horrifying genre changers. And after that, they’re all slopped together.
I truly believe it’s because these stories shouldn’t need follow-up in movie form. The more sequels you’re granted, the less creative control and influence you get.
Abarat still has a chokehold on me to this day and I read it when I was 11
True- SO much of his work is fantastic as stand alone pieces to make you think- candyman lingers in my mind so many years after i've seen it, while the sequels didn't last more than a day (Other than the impact Tony Todd's great performances in each)@@HorrorbleCWalt
AHHHH ABARAT IS SO GOOD
@@vintageincolor Abarat is one of my favorite book series!! I did a Candy cosplay and made a Malingo doll in my senior year of high school.
"How much can you change and get away with it, before you turn into someone else, before it's some kind of murder?" - Richard Silken
I'm writing a book. Dystopian fantasy 'mythic-punk' where one of the lead characters has voluntarily had their humanity stripped out of them so that he may bring balance and safety to a world teetering on the edge of oblivion caused by institutionalized morality, greed, and weakness. And I think there is some correlation between that process and the one described by one returning from the heroes journey " changed and enlightened but unrecognizable to yourself and everyone you know". This notion that to save humanity, to save the world, you can't BE part of humanity, you can't BE part of the world but rather exist outside its morality and reason so you can see it clearly.
This was really really good.
This analysis was very well thought out. One of your points reminded me of this Thomas Ligotti quote:
“Pain is essential. There's nothing else to do, no other way to be. We can call it what we like, say the pain is something else, or part of something else, and never fret about finding it to be otherwise. Finding it untrue. Because pain is essential, it is all there is.”
@@jpaulcrosby nice 💯
Idk why the Native American saying, “dude the sun is real,” got to me lmao😂
I have never watched a hellraiser movie in my life but the ‘lament configuration’ is the coolest fucking name for anything ever and completely redeems the franchise in my eyes
I've only seen the first movie but I liked it, worth the watch imo
The remake isnt perfect but the different "configurations" it talks about are pretty interesting and especially the way it defines the lament configuration especially i thought was really meaningful
I love how you go from an analytical takedown of the way humans perceive ourselves to “ Whoah, the Cenobites take Manhattan!” Chef’s Kiss!
I think that the way you are viewing Lovecraft is slightly wrong. He was a very small person despite his height and he thought he was better than the average person. If you look at his work, there are 3 things that always show up. First, he will describe one of the characters as being from a family of New England blue bloods. His wife's family had money and a lineage but he came from nothing in those respects. Second, he will give a graphic description of a structure. Things like the type of roof and windows. He was a failed architect. Third, he mentions some ancient legendary tomb. Things like "The Necronomicon" and "The Book of Eibon". He didn't get much recognition while alive. Put these things together and we have an author writing character that what he wants to be. The number of times a monster actually appears in the stories is like 5 and even then it's glimpses and impressions mostly. This is what Lovecraft was writing about whether he knew it or not. Fear, helplessness, shame, doubt, anticipation, worthlessness and inadequacy just to name a few. The genre of "Lovecraftian Horror" has his name but he only put in a small part of what is known as the "Cthulhu Mythos" and many of the monsters in it never appear anywhere near his stories. Just some thoughts
The Outsider is probably Lovecraft's wholistically best work because it is the most sincere about all of these anxieties, and places them appropriately, for once. (Which is to say, in the interaction between the individual and society, and not the fact that the Dutch or black people exist.)
I mean...yeah, the monsters don't physically show up in the most of the work because the fear of the unknowable is the point; almost an antithesis to spirituality whose primary purpose is the cessation of that fear whether it's obvious unknowables like death or the more insidious ones like the nature of men. Been known for a pretty long time we fear what we conjure in our imaginations more than what someone can show to us. Horror and terror are distinct sensations in response to different stimuli. I don't really disagree with anything else said here as I haven't thoroughly exhausted the work to know whether your thesis about the 3 things that always shows up holds true. Interesting perspective nonetheless.
@@kylegonewild I had replied to you but it didn't post it for some reason. I don't remember what I said but I will try again. The beings in his books are in fact "physically" present most of the time. In the 30's it seems like the understanding of the 4th dimension was that it was a spacial dimension. This is present in his stories as he would often use the plot device of the monster is a color that humans can't see or they occupy a spacial dimension that we can't experience. The point is fear of the unknown. Of that you are correct. I am presenting the reasoning as to why he wrote about it. He was haunted by dreams as a child and he carried his fear from sleep to his waking life. It's my speculation that he didn't receive much sympathy for this. I will elaborate on that shortly. The things that caused him fear were not real but he would have the feeling that something was there trying to get him. How would these feelings manifest in the writing of an author? You would show no monster as you never saw one yourself. You would write about impressions and a sense of knowing that it was near. As for the justification for the speculation, I believe the concept of going mad from seeing an old one is the manifestation in the writing of how he felt as a child when trying to relate what he experienced at night. While it is said you go mad, not a single person actually does. Characters that experience an old one do try to relate what they saw but nobody believes them. The story they tell is so fantastic that no person in their right mind would believe it. This is what gets the label of mad applied. It is not the seeing doing anything other than inducing extreme terror. The characters are locked up in institutions for telling their story or at best ostracized by the town. It is not hard to line up. He would wake in fear and try to tell someone about it. They were not understanding of how afraid he was and he received nothing in terms of support. He was very isolated as a child and weird to boot so considering the types of things he was afraid of, getting called mad seems like a reasonable possibility. The themes that people choose to put in their writings are often a direct reflection of how they feel or have felt whether knowingly or unknowingly. It is not always the case but it is a good rule of thumb when trying analyze a body of work. I think he is a lot more obvious with respect to that than most. Give @HorrorBabble a look if you're interested in getting more aquainted with his books or the greater mythos. There are hundreds of hours of well produced content from various authors. Ian Gordon has a great voice and sense of the material. He also writes some great stuff. Check it out and let me know if you arrive at similar conclusions about where Lovecrafts life experiences informed his writing.
He was notoriously antisemitic
@@SamuelBlack84 Among other character flaws, definitely. The stories from that time often had what is seen today as racist. Rightfully so imo. After having listened to the bulk of the mythos, I have noticed some differences. Lovecraft used terms like "my yellow guide" or "low-bred mongaloid features" with obvious derision. Conversely, Robert E Howard often used "blacks" or "negroid" but in the next sentence he would describe "how beautiful her black skin was". Others like CAS(Clark Ashton Smith) would use similar language but seemed more apathetic to the races of his characters. Not many people of color were a MC. Judaism is a religion and not a race so it's always been weird to me that it is put in the same category as ethnicity but it was and still is. Lovecraft was a detestable human being and the stories display parts of those short comings. I would have avoided him like the plague if I was a contemporary.
finally, Hellraiser gets the philosophical/anthropological discussion that it deserves. Well done, and much appreciated
right! now I need her, or someone to discuss Imajica, Barker's best work, imo.
As a Stoic, I want to point out that Stoicism is fundamentally incompatible with productivty/grindset/sigma culture. The passionate pursuit of wealth and material success renders one incapable of achieving dispassion. The "Stoics" you see are not genuine, they just take Marcus Aurelius quotes out of context, who also was not technically a Stoic, either.
As a lazy Epicurian, who never correctly looks into anything, I stand against everything you just said.
@@RandolphTheWhite1 As a Sagittarius, I would like to vaguely remind everyone that everything I stand for can be found on the lid of a snapple.
I've always thought that way about Marcus Aurelius. Like how much of a Stoic can he be in a Palace while running a massive empire.
She clearly doesn't know what she was talking about when she started ranting about stoicism, the video just became cringe.
She doesn't seem to know the difference between the English word stoic and the philosophy of Stoicism
@@seekthevisceral As a vegan who still eats meat in secret, certain Snapple flavors do not conform to my dietary guidelines and therefore must chastise all use of Snapple.
"Pain never happens in a vacuum." Wasn't quite ready to hear that today lmao
Me, spending the rest of my years hiding in the vacuum cleaner to avoid pain
I recently had a cluster headache, and I came out of it thinking a lot about Hellraiser. It was the most excruciating experience I've ever had. I have a new perspective on pain. I've seen the face of the Pain God, and I hope I never see it again.
Emotional and psychological pain is the worst
Well, this video just earned you another subscriber.
I'm a Buddhist and the religion is very much about how suffering is simply inevitable because you are alive. The ultimate goal of Buddhism is to eliminate suffering, but (at least in Tibetan Buddhism) that doesn't mean that you run away from suffering. Suffering is something that happens because you cling to your body and your ego. If you stop clinging to the self, your mission then becomes to eliminate suffering for others, which actually means that you take on suffering for "yourself" (which is actually just a collection of mental designations). If we can become adept at doing this, then we will attain enlightenment, which is a state that is both transcendent and imminent in a very immediate way.
What I appreciate in this perspective is the point that suffering is an inevitable consequence of existing as a functioning human. What I find lacking is any acknowledgment of the relativity of all forms of suffering and their opposites, such that the utter eradication of one pole entails the extirpation of the other. That's to say, for me at least, suffering has value and its total elimination would be misguided. In terms of the quality of experience, a good moment is only good relative to a moment that is less so. Also, I'm not hedonistic anyway. What I find more important than how good of a time I'm having is the vitality of the organism that I am. I could numb pain and feel incredible pleasure by taking various drugs, or go in the opposite direction like a cenobite, but these actions would tend to break down my body and lower any underlying vitality.
_"Suffering is something that happens because you cling to your body and your ego."_
I'm not so sure I get what clinging to the body entails. From my understanding, I _am_ a body, not something riding around inside one. Maybe I don't even want to get the secret, though, since my project isn't to anathematize or eliminate suffering but to accept it as just one necessary aspect of existence.
Anyway, good post - very interesting even if I don't agree with everything.
@@o.o5816
"What I appreciate in this perspective is the point that suffering is an inevitable consequence of existing as a functioning human."
No, this is not what Buddhism claims. Suffering arouses from ignorance - by seeing the world, life and self incorrectly you are suffering. Enlightenment is seeing world and life as it truly is, and in such existence there is still pleasure (which doesn't really matter because all pleasure is fleeting and ultimately doesn't matter but there still is pleasure for enlightened beings). Seeing world as it truly is is being permanently constantly aware that you are not your body, not your brain, not your soul, not your spirit, not even your mind understood as object but rather the activity of living itself. You are a verb not a noun basically. Also viewing all things happening to you just as neutral events that just happen and are not inherently good or bad - so that enlightened beings do not judge things that world gives them.
"What I find lacking is any acknowledgment of the relativity of all forms of suffering and their opposites, such that the utter eradication of one pole entails the extirpation of the other."
It is very interesting that in modern day Buddhism is showered with criticism of that kind and yet in the ages past nearly nobody in India nor China did thrown such arguments against Buddhism and trust me a lot of people in India and China thrown counterarguments against Buddhism (just not about that). It is quite intuitive to me because... why would eradication of suffering eradicate all pleasure? Like... it does require some special philosophical theory about pleasure and suffering to constitute such belief (that you just can't have the good without the bad because?), a theory that was not held through most of history.
"That's to say, for me at least, suffering has value and its total elimination would be misguided."
Suffering isn't necessary for humans to survive. It just necessarily arise from the kind of mind that majority of humanity has, that is mind riddled with attachments.
"In terms of the quality of experience, a good moment is only good relative to a moment that is less so."
Such is philosophical theoretical conjecture. Actual empirical data gathered by asking enlightened people shows that their existence is quite nice and pleasant, way more pleasant than before they had their spiritual enlightenment.
"What I find more important than how good of a time I'm having is the vitality of the organism that I am. I could numb pain and feel incredible pleasure by taking various drugs, or go in the opposite direction like a cenobite, but these actions would tend to break down my body and lower any underlying vitality."
The enlightened do not think about their vitality, do not think about the state of their body, do not worry that aging is going to make them sick, do not worry that they might die and yet they usually do not partake in any dangerous activities even though they do not think about self preservation. As one (this time actually Daoist, not Buddhist) master once said "You should not think about bad food as bad nor about good food as good. You should eat the good food and discard the bad food without judgment".
I feel that just like majority of people your reaction is going to be "but you just can't do that". People very frequently object to Buddhist teachings by saying that Buddhist advice is impractical, wrong or just anti-life because you can't actually follow that advice because it's impossible ect. Like folks feel like Star Wars prequel trilogy is some kind of marvelous critique against Buddhism because it shows how impractical Yodas advises about emotional control are when Anakin just fell in love.
All of this "It's impossible" think arouses from not knowing what sitting cross-leged with mind focused on breath can do to human mind. If you practice meditation daily and correctly you are going to attain altered states of awareness and with practice you are going to became capable of achieving and maintaining these states of altered awareness even outside meditation as you are doing your duties. If it is impossible to "think in the way Buddha told people to" it's because it requires mind training through meditation. Also when you are in meditation you are likely to just "realize" that you are not your body nor your mind but the process of living ect. you are going to realize that it's silly to worry about anything and instead you are just going to act cautiously without worrying. We do not need to feel fear in order to not act haphazardly.
"I'm not so sure I get what clinging to the body entails. From my understanding, I am a body, not something riding around inside one."
You are something happening in connection and contact with your body. You do not ride it, you are the riding. I agree with the more secular view that destruction of the body means that you are no longer happening but that doesn't mean that you are the body or the brain or the soul or the spirit.
The necessity of suffering is not absolute. It's not necessary in order to have sensations or to experience pleasure. It's just that when our desires are fulfilled and we are in a place where we wished to be we then want something else. When we achieve that something else then we wish for more or something different. When we are fed, well slept and aren't thirsty we start to crave to be safe and not endangered with death or future violations of our needs. When we are safe we want to be accepted by a group, we are social animals so we crave belonging, a sense of community. When we have community we wish for being respected, for being important, for being exemplar, for being above the rest of our community. We wish to be nobel laureates or furry artists making great porn or top influencers followed by millions or world-renowned doctors or video game designers making masterpieces for ages like Toby Fox or be CEO of some big corporation. When people are on top they seek some other top to be on. Human mind is endlessly seeking if it is muddled with ignorance. Only through enlightenment, spiritual realization can we be free from our needs, otherwise we endlessly seek with always being unhappy. The only ways to real happiness is either enlightenment or being brain in a vat with proper neural stimulators controlling us to only feel bliss and no pain. Otherwise you might survive and even live long, have the "vitality" that you care about, but you won't be happy.
@@AleksoLaĈevalo999 "You should not think about bad food as bad nor about good food as good. You should eat the good food and discard the bad food without judgment" i love that 😂
My spirituality is mostly informed by mystical Christianity, but it comes to similar conclusions
Nicely said, Foreign Network
heh, nondualist here and yeah, "verbing, not a noun" is a condensed phrase we've used to remind ourself at odd moments. love how that's a thing. Ever play Slay the Princess? We want to propose the term "Breaking the Fifth Wall" for what that experience did for us. Not so much reminding us that we're the audience or even a player outside a microcosmic object of media, but that we're also one in this drama we call "Real Life."
Oh yeah, also that part in "A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood" where Mr. Rogers makes eye contact with the camera for like a full minute during that zazen meditation in the diner.
The ever-loving Being Seen of it all.
basically the short explanation is that the cenobites are not demons and they do not come to punish the ones that open the box...they come to REWARD the openers with new and more extreme sensations and even state in the first two that pleasure and pain is indistinguishable.
I feel like the "pleasure and pain is indistinguishable" bit falls a little short. They are absolutely distinguishable in degrees and in a vacuum, triggered by different physical processes. The complex system that is the human neurological and nerve structures leaves open the door for the simultaneous processing of multiple competing inputs. That euphoria or bliss in the face of pain is a defense mechanism. One can trigger the other and they can occur simultaneously but they are most certainly unique sensations.
@@kylegonewild i know. i just mention it because it relates to one of the catchphrases for the cenobites. but like main point i was trying to make is that that the box is meant to be an invitation for people seeking more extreme and otherworldly "pleasures" but geared specifically for masochists
@@kylegonewildsee though here’s the thing, the cenobites are not human.
To the Cenobites, they aren't mutually exclusive
Experience is valid regardless of what form it takes
@@SamuelBlack84 yes exactly
The longer I'm on this planet, the more I appreciate Clive Barker's work.
I truly believe the remake fully captured the spirit of the first 2 movies and the book. It doesn't get enough love
I used to have a self harm problem and I used the really bad self harm forums. There's a few people there who have reached an almost celebrity status for just doing it really badly, carving out entire pieces of fat and somehow surviving (for a time at least) and doing it again next week to themselves. So I believe that limit experiences are real in a very physical visceral chemical sense, in which the brain is so fickle and malleable from trauma or even chance that it can actually break and begin to enjoy(or at least pursue) what others would call insane. So to me, the cenobites are less like BDSM and more like shtwt or something
see also: people addicted to deliriant drugs
The first time I watched hellraiser was before I got clean from self harm and that's definitely how I read the cenobites too.
Ironically(??), I was also getting into horror for similar reasons to why I was cutting -- I was depressed and emotionally numb and seeking out anything that could make me feel something
lolz
Your point about deliriants is insanely poignant - diphenhydramine experiences are simply not pleasurable in any way whatsoever. Once, and then never again for 99.5% of people. There is literally not a single pleasurable element to the experience. It's pure terror distilled. Meth abuse can create that unbridled terror, plenty other drugs can but these are untoward and unsought side-effects. I only have experience with two deliriants, datura and DPH, but that's enough to go on to be honest.
For most commonly available deliriants, the confusion, sense of displacement and "untowardness" of everything as well as things like entities speaking to you and disappearing, or insects crawling out of your... your everything, that IS the single side-effect these people are chasing.
Who would continue to seek OTC sleeping pills to eat an entire packet of them? I thought they simply had something so disturbed inside them that being in any altered state of mind was preferable - perhaps they have no other access to other drugs.
Yet, plenty did. Plenty were of an age where they could buy alcohol (18 in my country). This video and your secondary comment made me see they were chasing the limit experience of transcendental fear, pure terror itself. It's a step beyond what my s/h was doing - creating sensation in the absence of sensation. It's seeking the worst sensation possible, in a reliable and repeatable manner. Death by a thousand cuts is not repeatable. DPH abuse is infinitely repeatable - until you send yourself into a psychosis.
The DPH delirium is so gripping, so intense, so real that it's hyperreal and becomes the most acutely bizarre and horrifying experience you could've had. The unadulterated terror creates transcendental suffering: a limit experience.
(It's sad to see that these self-harm enablement spaces that I saw damage my fellow patients 15 years ago, are now flourishing in places like Twitter. I wish you the best of mental and physical health)
@@AdamOwenBrowningthat’s an odd take, I require a minimum of 400mg Diphenhydramine just to sleep at night because without it I can’t. At all. The insomnia combined with night terrors due to PTSD prevent rest. For me, diphenhydramine feels like a warm, fuzzy hug that slowly powers my brain down like turning off a computer until I reach the point of complete mental retardation and fall into a sleep that’s representative of a coma. Never hallucinations, never itching, just blissfully losing touch with mental faculties until they cease completely.
Thr 2022 remake really felt like it GOT the cenobites for me, the way pinhead seemed actually Confused by the lead rejecting the agony they offer, leviathan being a angelic devine light, the chatterer readying himself for dismemberment with seeming bearly suppresed anticipation..
I might also add a dash of Faustian bargaining into the mix. Particularly concerning Frank’s expectations of sensual rewards for going to such great lengths to locate and solve the lament configuration.
Pain is the most beautiful thing you will ever feel. Because as long as you can feel pain you are alive. I speak from experience. In 2004 I was struck by an RPG. I lost enough blood that I should not have had the blood pressure to stand up-( that’s a story in and of itself) I quit counting after 763 holes of various sizes. When you don’t know if you’re alive or dead focus on the pain. If you can feel the pain you’re still alive.
There's this novel written by Chuck Palahniuk called "Diary". In it, the concept of pain and suffering as a means to achieve spiritual and artistic enlightenment is very well expressed. The main character was a woman who was being surreptitiously manipulated into creating amazing works of painted art by the wealthy quasi-royalty of a small island by causing her pain, suffering and tragic loss.
Whoa, that's the only book of his I own, and in all probability, the last (physical?) one I've read since 2017. My spark had gone from an eleven to a zero over the course of a few years and I was looking for... something.
I stopped halfway through, when her muse returned and she was bursting with energy again. I wanted to save that part for once I too was at that place again. But maybe now, the moment is right to finish reading it.
Thanks.
Let's not mention J.G. Ballard's _Crash_ .
“How many angels can dance on the heads of Pinheads pins” was absolutely brilliant.
so glad there's people out there who can laugh at that one
Once you realize you're not supposed to feel pain, there's nothing to be afraid of anymore. Scp 5000. I don't know, but the tittle made me remember that line.
You explained Julia's actions better than anyone I've ever seen.
In late 2017, I developed fibromyalgia, which I genuinely believe is the closest to a limit experience the human body *can* actually get without outside incitement-- where every physical sense, quite literally is pain-- you taste it, electrically, it dances behind your eyes to be projected as a lens over everything you see, and you are *changed* because yes, if it continues long enough your link between "pleasure" and "pain" blurs to raw Sensation. Having been writing my entire life I came out of it feeling a bit more equipped to *attempt* to describe it than most but like, your body can just *do that* to you, for no reason at all. I'm not the person I was, and I don't mean now because I'm immune-compromised and in "pain" all the time now. There is pain and there is Sensation. "Angels to some, demons to others" Sensation is transformation. I had such a greater appreciation for Hellraiser as a story post-diagnosis: having been to that edge and knowing by how they look at you that the people you love no longer recognize you, that you have been transformed. Some people with my condition scramble to salvage something of themselves: the fabled **before**. "Before I was sick" "before I got Covid" -- you see this in conversations around Long Covid especially. People who were perfectly healthy begging for a "cure" instead of bending to the change, the transformation and yes, the limitation of your own ability to understand what has happened to you. It's a fascinating thing to watch play out with people, and as a society that is now so demographically different in terms of health. I wonder if anyone else, like me, found comfort in certain aspects of Hellraiser as a story, post-auto immune diagnosis.
Had a similar experience with Ringu, with Sadako as the archetype of The Prisoner. Chronic fatigue had us for years, but it was obscure to any doctor we spoke to. Come 2020, suddenly the world becomes a macrocosm to our particular brand of invisible suffering, all trapped and isolated. Then we discovered the bottom of the well is an entrance to the Labyrinth, and all its strange wisdom.
Oh yeah, then it got infinitely weird when one of the cenobites in the 2022 film was called The Gasp. A name we'd chosen for ourself a year prior. Now that I recall that, I'm really interested in watching this video.
video was aight, but any discussion about pain or powerlessness is wanting without disabled literacy
Try a long term high dose heroin or oxycodone withdrawal you may find worse
I wrote an essay during a painful health crisis about how extreme pain seems to slow or eliminate the perception of time for myself and others. I have wondered if that is why heaven or hell are reported to be infinite and eternal.
@@Opinion8dsngr does it bring you fully into the moment-where you can't hold the past or the future, just the undeniable present?
10:47 - Not having a reaction to such a scene isn't a sign of stoicism, it's a sign of indifference. And indifference is the death of empathy.
Stoicism and pseudo-stoicism; The former is an idea that one may skip from all stages of grief immediately to acceptance, while the latter is yet another disguise of the idea that it's unhealthy to show emotion, because it makes you "weak."
Bottling up emotions for too long causes problems, one of which are people that begin to hate the world for it, as they feel victimized.
I'm three minutes in and I have never seen a youtuber understand Hellraiser before so thank you.
Yoooo I am 11 minutes in and I am subscribing to your channel.
Okay listen Hellraiser 1 has been my number one favourite movie since I was 14 and that was 26 years ago. Hellraiser had a defining and revealing effect on my sexuality and personal philosophy. I met Clive Barker and talked to him and got to express my heartfelt gratitude for creating Hellraiser and he accepted it graciously and in return genuinely and from his heart thanked me for expressing it. It has been a long-ass time since I have considered that there might be anything new that I missed about Hellraiser, or even that most people would understand the things that I understood about it.
Not to be like "I'm a very special boy" or anything but basically Hellraiser (and the novella) is a thing that has been simultaneously preciously personal to me and remarkably misunderstood by others throughout my entire life.
Long story short, wowee wow very good video, thank you for making it.
@@Chunkypumpkinheaddude same 😂
I can’t believe you didn’t bring up the French movie Martyrs from 2008. Spoilers for the movie below:
Martyrs is a fantastic, harrowing film that starts as a thriller body-horror/home invasion movie that completely left turns into psychological horror about torturing a young woman until she enters a sublime state to reveal the secrets of Nirvana and the universe. A goal that is achieved and, once heard, immediately causes the listener to kill herself. It’s fantastic and ties so well to the points in this video.
Pascal Laugier was actually attached to an adaption of Hellbound Heart at one point but it fell through :(
I’ve seen video essays about this movie but can’t bring myself to watch it.
Martyrs was... it was too much for me. I genuinely wish I could unsee it. I appreciate what they were going for, but I'd like that movie to leave my brain.
yes. great flic. one of the best
@specialknees6798
there's a level of disconnect you have to go through, honestly I fell for the movie because it felt like being seen
I think to be afraid of falling, is to imagine yourself stepping off the high place you're standing on, and recoiling from that thought. For as pointless and outdated as a lot of Freudian specifics are, he was right to notice the fact that accompanying a fear of falling is a desire to leap from the ledge. The cenobites are the manifest form of the knowledge that you cannot feel flight without leaping to your death, that implicit in absolute transcendence is absolute change. We fear them, at least partially, because they are not truly unrecognizable - while they clearly stand on the other side of a threshold we cannot comprehend, what SCARES us is that we feel something implicit to our human consciousness, expressed by them. That is, what scares us is that they are not alien, that they are voice to the question of why pain (not just physical) is such a fundamental characteristic of life, the question of whether pain has some deeply human meaning, and their answer is a booming "YES". If pain doesn't 'mean' anything, then we don't have to accept it, we can flee it or subdue it or wallpaper over it, but the cenobites are familiar to the part of us that recoils from the thought of suffering being such a central part of life that it should be embraced. Like a fear of heights, that recoiling is only there because some deeper, instinctive part of us, actually considers the possibility of embracing and facing up to that pain in the first place, the impulse to fly even if it literally means falling to our deaths.
To be glib, what is scary about the cenobites is that they AREN'T the ones pushing us to jump. We find them scary, personal, rather than alien, because we make the desire to jump all by ourselves.
also the very first opening scene of hellbound heart is a mental monologue of the guy while trying to open the box and basically demonstrating that those who know of the lament's configuration and actively seek it out usually already know what's going to happen if they succeed and anticipate it but also underestimate how far the cenobites are going to go with their "reward".
People fear the cenobites because they represent an irreversible, permanent change that will shatter your current reality forever; one that is inescapable and forces you to feel its presence at all times.
Of course you want greater thresholds in life, but most people want to return to some sense of sameness, because reality, ugly as it is, grounds us. It's something we're always trying to escape, yet we always want to return to at our leisure.
@@AltairEgo1 also its because they go beyond what is acceptable. the cenobites are a fantasy depiction of a real world lifestyle that is taken to such an extreme degree that isn't possible in this current reality. it's all depends on the individual asking how far is too far, even for those that actually want it. and there are plenty that want it
@@gusty7153 I know of one character, I think in the comics, who fell in love with a cenobite. He enjoyed the torture and formed an attachment to a female cenobite.
@@AltairEgo1 i gotta find the comics
The attempt to repackage stoicism as a remedy to the tragedies of modern life kind of reminds me of the from Mike Flanagan's Fall of the House of Usher:
"we said it was about soothing the world's pain. That's the biggest lie we ever told. You can't eliminate pain. There's no such thing as a painkiller.
Imagine if we put that on the bottle
I bet I still could have sold it"
You can learn to deal with and understand it.
"You're on earth. There's no cure for that"
Samuel Beckett
"Stoicism" peddled on youtube is the ultimate un-cut copium.
Stoicism is not to lack emotion its to be in control of them and not to let them control you.
The way in which the Order of the Gash is presented in the first chapter of _The Hellbound Heart_ is just...sublime.
Oh lord, those later movies. I was never scared of the Cenobytes in the first movie, the real monsters were the humans involved. I watched ot when I was a kid 25 years ago and I'm still freaked out by Julia and Frank. What an interesting video, thank you! ❤
"Life is pain. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something."
Christianity does not talk about punishment for every action or that life has this big meaning
We were meant for more, but we can reject this and go our own way, from dust came, dust to return
Free will plays a big factor, and you can choose to live in flesh, live and die, or you can choose to try to reclaim the lost inheritance in Christ
Anyone who tries to preach about Hell is NOT a Christian, because the scriptures very clearly contradict such a notion
Not according to many denominations. Hell being a metaphor is a very new teaching all things considered.
@@mercury3352 and?
@@khankorpofficial so what basis do you have to claim that hell isn’t real that’s any more founded than what idk, the original church created by Jesus himself says on the matter? Hell is described as very real in multiple passages.
I feel like Hellraiser 2022 was what I was finally waiting for. It's different from the first 2 but I appreciate it as it's own work. The addiction metaphor really spoke to me, and there was this constant sense of "faux-resistance" from the drug-dealer analogue characters. Both the Cenobites and the other villains have that kinda "noooo, doooon't, stoooooop" vibe to them and it's so good on rewatch.
I feel like the idea of the Lament Configuration granting evil-jeenie-style wishes if you feed enough people to it kinda undermines the ethos of cenobites as established by Barker. In the original novel, at least, the box attracted people with a deep-seated, selfish desire, regardless if they were actively seeking cenobites out. Cenobites were not an evil dragon, waiting for fresh virgins - they were fae, claiming anyone who dares glimpse their form into their endless revelry.
Not to mention that Riley was one of the most hateable horror protagonists I've seen in a while. The moment her brother got claimed by the Box she grew from unlikable to nigh unforgivable. I almost couldn't properly enjoy the film because I hated that little cunt so much. That fact that in the end she gets off scott free while people who were trying to save her sorry ass have either suffered a fate worse than death or came close to it really put a damper on an otherwise well-made film. "Why, of course a little survivor's guilt is on par with unimaginable torture" my ass...
@@borealsullivan5486 the question that was asked in the 2022, at least in my opinion, was how far are you willing to go for enlightenment. The enlightenment the Cenobites bring is through pain and tribulation. This is why they were disappointed in Riley at the end. She rejects there offer and will never know what could have been and now she is left with the not knowing. Voight on the otherhand doesn't undetstand the "gift" the Cenobites offer until he chooses "power" and quite literally ascendes to become a Cenobite himself and understands.
@@erwin669 That sounds good on paper, but the fact that cenobites are perfectly willing to "enlighten" unwilling and often innocent participants makes the final conclusion sound hollow.
It's arguably what makes cenobites in the original movie appear more evil compared to the novel. That is, their relation to Kirstie. In the novel she was Frank and Julia's frumpy friend that harboured a secret crush on Frank and resented Julia. That's why she was drawn to the box - she just didn't have the state of mind to accept the cenobites' gift, just like Frank. While in the movie it appears that cenobites take anyone who solves the puzzle box, which also makes for a continuity error between the first movie and the second, where Pinhead suddenly states that It's intent that matters, not the hands that opened the box.
@@borealsullivan5486 I'd argue that Riley (in the remake) is prefectly willing, she's just not aware how willing she is. She is doing drugs and letting her life fall apart because she doesn't find meaning in her life. Had it not been people she cared about being sacrificed to the Cenobites she would have taken them up on their offer to go deeper. The Cenobites are neither good or evil, they just are.
Kristy, as far as the movie goes, was more than willing. She eventually becomes a Cenobite herself in Barker's continueity
@@erwin669 I guess it was the visceral feeling of how horribly unfair it all was to people around her that ticked me off. Drag Me to Hell gave me the same feeling. But because in DMTH there was only ever one victim of the curse it left me with a sinking depression, while in Hellraiser remake most of the "deaths" that occur are arguably Riley's fault it instead made me angry at her in particular. And she's lucky that in the remake being taken by cenobites doesn't seem to be an eternal damnation like in the original series, otherwise it would've impacted my impression of the film much more negatively 😅
Being against tattoos is more of an evangelical Protestant / modern conservative Catholic thing. Christianity historically was either ambivalent or fully accepting of tattoos.
In the Catholic Church during the Crusades, it was ruled in the Council of Northumberland that religious tattoos were permissible, and even "praiseworthy". At the time, many Catholic knights and pilgrims made use of tattoos, especially at the completion of a pilgrimage to the Catholic shrines in the Holy Land. Some Catholic military orders, such as the Knights of St. John of Malta, sported tattoos to show their allegiance.
It was commonly used as a symbol that you would not give up your faith if captured by Islamic armies.
Orthodox Coptic Christians who live in Egypt commonly tattoo themselves with the symbols of Coptic crosses on their right wrists for similar historical reasons.
From there, the tradition spread throughout Eastern Christian communities such as the Ethiopian, Armenian, Syrianand Maronite Churches.
Catholic and Orthodox Croats in Bosnia utilised tattooing of crosses for perceived protection against forced conversion to Islam and enslavement during the Ottoman occupation of Bosnia. This has continued into modern times.
Tattoos are also traditionally done on pilgrims who complete a visit to Jerusalem
Orthodox Croats? Rlly? Please ask some Croatian if Orthodox Croats exist 😂
@BrutalPuppy I don't know if this comment is an attempt at some old-fashioned eastern european racism but Orthodoxy is the second-largest religious denomination in Croatia. There are ethnic Croats who are Orthodox and ethnic Serbs who are Catholic.
I'm a Christian, and I'm not against people getting tattoos, I just don't want to have tattoos. Not because of pain or anything like that, but in terms of money. I already have a weapons addiction, I don't need to add tattoos to the equation
Yeah because people don't use them now for the purposes of meaningful art, they use it to destroy their bodies and future prospects. It's just meaningless post modern drivel now.
That doesn't change what Leviticus 19:28 says. It's in their book of rules.
Hellraiser was always one of my absolute favorite guilty pleasure movies; the blend of psychological horror and abstract physical horror was just so morbidly satisfying.
Also; what a great fkn channel! Just found you out and already subbed, you’re doing great work!
"Pain never happens in a vacuum." Oh yeah? tell that to my Dyson suction injury.
You're a fantastic essayist and sociologist. I've loved everything that I've seen so far and I look forward to seeing more of your work in the future
I would be interested in seeing your take on The Godhand from Berserk. The creator of the manga, Kentaro Miura, has said they were inspired by Hellraiser but he definitely has a different philosophy regarding their purpose. It's a long but wonderful series.
The xenobytes are apostles that welcome you upon awakening the behelit/cube. Unless you can overcome the hellish forces trying to recruit you, your monstrous evolution is assured like a divine fate.
Miura-San will be greatly missed. 🥲
Demons to some, angels to others is an amazing line. It's been rattling around my head since the 90s. I never forgot my first showing of Hellraiser or it's sequel. I've done the required reading, with relish. I loved the books of blood, all 6. All his comic books, or at least the ones with his characters. Weave World and Imajica were most eccentric & excellent. But The Great and Secret Show never stopped effecting me. I just picked it up to read yet again and somehow (they're listening) RUclips knew and presented me with this video. I'm so happy it did. Your thoughtful and astute observations about Hellraiser & The Hellbound Heart put into words what I've always known but was unable to articulate. I'm so impressed! I can't wait to watch more of your videos. Kudos!
And your cat trying to eat you? That happens to me a lot. Life is pain.
Ps. I never knew Clive Barker's ties to the LGBTQ community. Mind you it never mattered to me before, and knowing it now it still doesn't matter to me. His art speaks volumes and that's all that matters. To me at any rate. I wonder if it will enhance my appreciation of his art? I look forward to finding that out. ❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🩷
Thank you! ☺️
I saw the cenobites as Judges, or genies. Just giving you what you want. I feel the re-make does the wish part pretty well. What are you willing to do for your wish...and that wish is just a reflection of your desire, not so much what you want. I always loved that you had to seek the Box in order to call the Cenobites. The person after the box was the monster, and the cenobites where putting order back into place.
I love this interpretation. Always hated the direct religious connections implied in various Hellraiser material. I always essentially saw cenobites the way you describe, even if i never actually put words to it myself.
This video left me speechless. I feel like few people truly understand the ideas behind Barkers creations, but you GET it, and you did an incredible job of explaining it. (I also love your dog)
Thank you ☺️
11:14 exactly, violence doesn't exist in a vacuum, it's always violence from one social class unto another. (Capitalists inflict pain upon the working masses and are not subjected to any law or moral demand due to their power)
I discovered the channel through the Sound of Freedom video and now I'm watching Hellraiser analysis. That's range, right there. 😂
Keep up the good work!!
For a PG-13 take of the fusion of divinity and pain, you might look into the evolving interpretation of the goddess Loviatar in Dungeons and Dragons. Back in the original run of D&D in the eighties, Gary Gygax infused the RL mythical Finnish dark goddess Loviatar who is associated with winter and suffering with the essence of a dominatrix to create a fan classic that has endured through multiple editions and pantheons to this day. Originally starting as an obscure entry in the old school Dieties and Demigods manual, Loviatar has risen to become part of the canon pantheon of Forgotten Realms, the default long running game world of D&D. Despite being classified as Lawful Evil, the philosophy of her and her followers is that pain is a necessary part of being for the evolution of self and society. Acts of heroic altruism deny this opportunity to others and are from the goddess's point of view evil. Thus Loviatar and her followers oppose the traditionally good heroic player characters because from the goddesses's point to view the heros are the evil ones taking on the suffering of others to strengthen themselves and thus weaken the rest of the world's population who remain dependant on the heros to survive.
Nothing so meta in a role playing game like recontexualizing gaining experience points as a bad thing.
PC hero's are just kill stealing XP from the peasantry.😂
It is absolutely an Asian Thing !!!! Watch "Seven years in Tibet" & understand why Brad Pitt did not get the Girl , because western & eastern philosophy are diffrent Which is why Communism took hold because in essence it agrees with the egoless life. Rather than being a stand out show off CAPITOLIST AMERICAN Stereotype..
I swear everyone makes everything about dominatrixses these days. Why?
@@MALICEM12 Gygax created this version of Loviatar in the early 1980s. Kink has been around a while. It's just out in the open now.
@@ravendelacour1917 by these days I didn't literally mean this year. The 80s isn't so far in the grand scheme of things
Great analysis! The part about Georges Bataille reminded me of the movie Martyrs. If you want proof that a movie about limit experiences is not enough to keep an audience, looking at the reception of that movie is a good example.
I had the same thought. That is a less than subtle depiction of the Pain-Transcendence, um, notion.
I was going to comment about that; the photo of the high as balls guy being cut into pieces makes an appearance in the movie, and the Idea that extreme pains can bring transcendance feels very on brand for a hellraiser movie, which martyrs, at least officially, isn't. a certain character in the middle of the movie even looks rather cenobite-like.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought of Martyrs during that section of the video.
I’m not sure by any means, but I feel like the ending for Martyrs was a big part of why it probably failed. Hellraiser implied a lot of different things about what might happen to a person after they’ve “transcended,” and while it’s not very specific or hard-rule, it definitely shows that there’s at least _an answer, that there’s not really a way to transfer knowledge of that answer without _showing_ someone, and that you’re not going to get shown the answer without _desiring_ it, even if you don’t really know what getting that desire fulfilled looks like (Frank.) it didn’t even have a Christian context in the originals. Refusing to go with the “it’s hell” route is pretty impressive for a horror movie about a painful afterlife.
Martyrs didn’t do that at all, it has people who get forced to experience that transcendence, the answer isn’t about the limit experience at all, but about the secrets of the afterlife. Even worse, that secret was easily communicated when the hero explains to the villain what she sees in her final moments, and the villain commits suicide when she finally learns the secret. Whatever answer she heard, all we can read as the audience in that scene is “oh boy, that secret sure is bad, dude, amirite?” Lastly, the whole plot borrows from similar ideas to Hellraiser, but _none_ of the story really meshes well, because it’s used in a stereotypically Christian context and as a result it misses all the points Hellraiser nailed.
@@awkwardukulele6077 I don't really buy martyrs as a movie with a christian framework, aside from the villains being old white french people with money, meaning they're probably christian... the villains are looking for answers about the afterlife, but the movie is pretty vague about what that is, or even if the MC might just be plainly hallucinating.
and the answer could be really bad... or really good... the thing that hints at the answer being bad news for the vilains is that she refuses to pass it on further.
The fact that some of the experience can be recounted with words doesn't really diminish it since we are not privy to what's being regardless. To me the whole point is that an oral summation of a glimpse is earth shattering enough, even though it's watered down.
Anyway, the fact that the people looking for answers do so by torturing proxies makes a move away from typical slasher morality (where the transgressors are usually the ones tormented), but to me it kinda fits some of the more transgressive aspects of the original hellraiser, especially regarding the absence of objective morality, but yes, I'll admit it's less palatable - martyrs certainly isn't a movie I'd want to watch again.
I'm glad those "your feeling of helplessness is your best friend savage." vibes exist. I wouldn't be able to enjoy horror otherwise.
This is one of the best videos I have ever watched on this subject. I have read Barker since I was 13 years old, and I love that you shot down the Lovecraft/Barker similarities. One could make the same argument with King and Barker as well. Well done!
Thanks for watching ☺️
@@themorbidzoo it was my pleasure. I also subbed. 🖤
2022 was the year I started my medical transition and finally started HRT. I guess I was one of the lucky trans women who didn't get her libido killed and senses seemed to be enhanced. Colors are more vivid, more sensative to touch, actually seeing the beauty of things in the world, actually feeling emotions of the first time. I became a more sensing person and it is very hard to describe things.
I kinda felt like I understood where the Cenobites were coming from because they get to experiance all of the thngs. And coming from a world where I didn't get to experiance most of the things that humans seem to do and having my own awakening I don't blame them for wanting to experiance all of the things
(positive reaction) That's fascinating. I re read your comment multiple times.
That's a good analogy...but golly I hope that's all it is.
@@PlayNiceFolks consent is a cornerstone to BDSM. And unlike the Cenobites I go with expressed consent rather implied consent.
This is perhaps the most intelligent, profound exposition on Hellraiser I’ve seen. And I’m pretty sure I’ve watched them all. I too am a Clive Barker, Hellraiser, cenobite fan. ✌️
It's definitely their monastic monk/priest aesthetics and those background ringing bells that add a lot to their creepiness.
That was genuinely one of the best explanations I have ever heard. You precisely conveyed would I struggled to convey to many not only about Hellraiser but horror itself. I enjoy horror for its ability to challenge an explore the taboo. The existence of something that challenges worldview and perception. Whether It be the works of Clive Barker where the horrors of the human essence are made real or the cold Indifference of something beyond your comprehension made by authors like H. P. Lovecraft, horror is variable. It cannot be defined by a simple formula and once it tries to it looses it's value. The point of horror fundamentally is that it try's to shock or scare you, maybe even both. The way talented people do this can be done other than just cheap jumpscares or a cheesy ghost. The best way to create horror is to challenge the unknown. Make an audience experience something new. Clive Barker did this beautifully when he created the 1987 film. I think what he did should be preserved and studied for years to come. I know for sure the sequels could have benefited from that. Thank you for conveying that and much more. You have done amazing work!
Thank you ☺️
As someone who's been involved in bdsm for a number of years, ive grown to understand that pain is very mysterious. After we get past the sexual nature involved, we start to see a deeper level immerge. Ive known people who get no sexual satisfaction from it, but instead they used pain almost as a sort of therapy. Its difficult for them to explain, but it evidently helps ithem in a very personal way. These are those you see who take their bdsm very seriously, its not a Saturday night bag of tricks for them, like it is to the more casual practitioners. Its their medicine, their therapy. These are those who have regular schedules they stick to & its truly fascinating to know such a person. The human mind is so complex.
I was in high school when the original Hellraiser was released, and it became an instant favorite. I had read a lot of Barker’s works up until then, and to this day he remains one of my favorite artists, whether in literature or in visual media. Since then, however, every time I watched the first film, I experienced a ravenous hunger for hot dogs, and I only realized the reason once I got older.
Apparently, Julia Cotton isn’t the only one who finds Skinless Franks to be desirable.
I apologize for that horrible joke, I’ve just been making it since around 1989 and it’s been poorly received 99.9% of the time. I really enjoyed your video though, you hit on many points that have irked me over the years due to most people misunderstanding the ideas behind The Hellbound Heart, and the nature of such things as Cenobites, pain as obstacle, journey, and goal, heaven and Hell, etc. Excellent video, and I’m happy to have subscribed to your channel.
Thanks for such great insights into one of my all-time favorite stories, and I wish you all the best for the new year.
(And again, sorry about the hot dog joke. 😆)
That was incredible. No one's ever talked extensively to me about Hellraiser. The story fascinates me, and I've never really thought about why.
"death penalty... committed for emotional satisfaction"- damned simplistic AND insightful...
Holly shit are you going to mention Georges Bataille?! Hurray I’ll have my bingo card ready! Hell yeah I look forward so much to this video. :D
Spoiler alert yes
@@themorbidzoo yes!!!! I have been searching for anything I can find from this guy, and I look forward so much to your interpretation of him.
George bataille mentionned !!! Hahaha
Bataille is cool, jus' remember never to go full Foucault 'cause you know what they say: never as a woman her age, never ask a man his salary, an' never ask your fave French philosopher why they signed that petition in the 70's...
@@themorbidzoo .. Lovecraft was a decent, Good person -
While the kind of community Barker came from could never wrap their head's around the fact that they brought uneeded problems onto everyone by engaging in the unsafe pastimes they did. And literally ignored warnings from God. +
This is by far the best reflection on Hellraiser I've heard, great work.
I am absolutely floored. As a transwoman and years long fan of this mythos, FINALLY, someone who GETS IT. The scholarship is impeccable, and I have seen/read damn near every relevant work referenced here and in Barker's oeuvre, but I actually believe you understand the appeal better than even its author. 10/10, could not possibly criticize, I don't know if I've ever felt more seen!
@@cheyennecartwright7244 thanks, glad it hit 🥰
I found your video to be insightful, the commentary witty and biting, and your balance of seriousness and comedy tasteful. Subscribed.
Being such a newbie to the concept of the Cenobite and only hearing about Pinhead from sources like Dead By Daylight, I find this analysis so well written pleasant to listen to.
I have to say this was randomly suggested to me by the Algorithm and I'm very glad it was. Your analysis of this topic was very deep and comprehensive. I really enjoyed it and the work you put into it. I don't think I've encountered something this interesting since taking philosophy in college. Thank you for doing this for us. It is greatly appreciated. Also, I love the first two movies and this really did a great job of pointing out the flaws in subsequent movies. I wish you all the best. Peace
Thank you for this. Hellraiser has long been my favorite horror franchise, despite the films' best efforts to the contrary. And it is all rooted in stuff like this - the deeper concepts and meaning. There are rules, a philosophy to it all, not just senseless "kill teenagers because they're there".
Just found this channel! Absolutely amazing content, covering all my favorite films haha
Thank you!
Thanks ☺️
Edit: omg your name just clicked into place in my head, I love your ER lore vids!! Cheers 🥂
Not two of the best (and my favorite) media analysis channels casually tipping their hats to each other
I find it either incredibly coincidental or absolutely intentional on your part to briefly show the depiction of the martyred Saint Sebastian being pierced by arrows.
If you're familiar with the Japanese author Yukio Mishima, he was obsessed with this image. He himself expressed in his semi-autobiographical novel Confessions of a Mask that this image of St. Sebastian was the cause of his sexual awakening as he was aroused by it (in so many words)
Mishima had a life long fixation on death, particularly ritual suicide, to the point that its argued his last act on earth was at best an act of sedition against his government, and at worst performance art in an attempt to reach that Limit Experience.
I urge you to delve into his story as it is utterly fascinating.
Anyhoo...this vid was so well thought out, executed and communicated. Take my sub! 😊
Yea, the pseudo-stoicism trend really rubs me the wrong way too. It rhymes of the early internet edge-lords, convincing themselves they're above everyone else because they're not _emotional_ about the social norms they decide to flout.
These dweebs are often the first people to scream and shout when slightly inconvenienced too, because they don't consider anger one of these emotions.
Actual stoicism is the other side of the coin to Buddhism, where one says suffering is your lack of discipline, that you should only concern yourself with that which you can control. The other says suffering is nature, and you should seek to detach from it.
They're both incredibly solipsistic philosophies that promote detaching yourself from the human condition because they find it icky, basically.
You could probably use either to modulate how you deal with suffering, but the idea that we should seek to control or detatch from our humanity to become _better_ is just undiagnosed mental illness and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
You don't have to be ruled by your emotions to experience them, to accept them as a part of you. Being human, being flawed, vulnerable, happy, sad, angry, melancholy, afraid, wonderlusted. They're all part of the rich tapestry of our existence, denying any part of them because they're undignified or inconvenient is cowardice, pure and simple. Children turning their noses up at their medicine.
Great video, Hellraiser has been one of my favourite series since I got the first 3 films on a DVD boxset when I was a teen. The imagery always struck a chord.
💯
Great analysis. You have a wondrous mind. Thank you for sharing your perspective on Hellraiser, it allowed me to further my own thoughts what I found to be a story which had several extra layers beneath what one sees at the surface of all the morbidity and gore.
@@Lamoraa69 thanks so much, glad it hit for you ☺️
This is definitely one of the upper tier video essays I’ve seen on this platform, good job.
this was really interesting! I always interpreted Hellraiser as Blue and Orange morality seen through a Black and White lens. All these small petty people opening a box looking for something quantifiable on a human scale, only to be faced with creatures so evolved passed us that their extremes are unimaginably esoteric for us to grasp. It is extreme pain because our sad little human nerves can't interpret the signals of the Other in any way that does not lead to being forever changed.
Very cool video
I had no idea Pinhead was portrayed by a trans woman in the new Hellraiser movie. That is so cool. Her performance was absolutely amazing, I loved every second she appeared on screen and really felt that for the first time there was an actual successor to Doug Bradley as an iconic and unforgettable Pinhead.
Anyways time to binge the channel now.
Really appreciated the bit of interpretation around her in this. I don't know hellraiser stuff well and haven't seen the new one yet, but knew about Jamie from sense8. And, well, hitting a point in transition of needing to start some potentially painful stuff, so that... REALLY landed.
Doug Bradley himself praised her performance, so she has that stamp of approval as well.
This was an incredibly profound take. Not simply on Clive Barker's work, but sadomasochism, metamorphosis, and the potential philosophical (even theological) ties to them.
Subscribed, and look forward to seeing more of your work.
Earned a new sub. That was beautiful. As a huge philosophy nerd, weirdo and trans person... I think that you're explanation of limit experiences and the wider spectrum was quite elegant, and simply I would argue... they are one in the same. Consciousness on any level is a form of limit experience and it's just a matter of you're paying attention to that. I think you could even symbolize and theorize upon this using mathematics. Just food for thought for anyone that reads this.