Is VAR really helping football?🫢
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- Quality football videos every day.
Main channel
/ @footballtime
Instagram
...
Tik Tok
www.tiktok.com...
Football Time Live
/ @footballtime_live
Tik Tok Live
www.tiktok.com...
Twitter
/ media
“Is VAR really helping football?”
Proceeds to show a clip of a Portugal game that didn’t have VAR
Same thing with the first one
"Portugal" game 🇷🇸
I am Serbian and it was goal.
Lol 😂😂 it was to good to be a goal tbh insane save
Vous avez vu de l’arrêt de fou en vrai mais en vrai de vrai il a arrêté quand même, mais il a marqué quand même aller but
This ain't var, it's goal line tecnology and is really accurate
Just like the nba and NFL with obvious miscalls, obvious goals thanks to tech still they not calling em
Actually the one between Chivas and other Mexican club was nullified for the VAR and it was goal clearly (and the line technology marked goal)
900th like!
really accurate are you special?
the dont have hawk eye and use VAR, even in LaLiga the do it this way
2 clips didn't have VAR in use, pure fucking genius
😂😂
One had GLT tho
And it's the goal line technology not var
@@jambow8469 GLT Has nothing to do with VAR. GLT was introduced a few seasons before VAR was even considered
I think that’s the point
I am serbian and i am soo happy for that goal because i am proudly saying serbia is the most unlucky country in football
Bro just started watching football💀
No you are dumb all fifa hate ronaldo if you watch football more then four five years you know ❤
@@furvo-j8m no por hablar ingles tienen que ser estadounidenses ahuevo, crack
@@marcelsanchez4749 mexicano🦧🐒
@@marcelsanchez4749 Gai
Barcelona 😂😂 copy
Bro showed 2 clips that VAR wasn't in use
Yes
You just wanted an excuse to start a sentence with the word “bro…” 🤦♂️
@@hatesitrick what 🤣
@@hatesitrick He is Right 💀
@@haryad492 I know he’s read you idiot - “bro is completely missing the point” - that skull emoji as well - will you ever grow up 😂
Who ever did the edits is the reason why we need VAR.
Só piorou mas ainda com o var mesmo
Var is ruining football and run by clueless idiots
The first clip was a goal allowed with hawk eye technology. It was 100% a goal. A title winning goal as well lol.
No shit last one deserve no goal IT LITERALLY SAVED A CHILD LIVE
It's true
How?
@@aYiN_N0N3xTeNc3 ronaldo got mad for no goal then throw his captain band then someone with sick daughter pick it up then sell it later he used that money to afford a surgery for his daughter which turn out successful
@@aYiN_N0N3xTeNc3the loco cartel was threatening to kill ref's kid😔
@@aYiN_N0N3xTeNc3after ronaldo got angry, he throw his captain armband. Firefighter took it and put it on auction and sold it for 2mil, and then he gave money to the family of kid who was in life danger, his operation costed 2mil... he saved his life
The problem is not VAR, the problem are the referees that control it
Imagine blaming on CCTV. Football fans are dumb
Jesus people are dumb. VAR isn't an it. VAR is a person. The VAR is a referee, not a computer. It's a referee sat in a room with screens. The VAR is the problem because the VAR is the person making the decisions. However, it's not actually a problem, as someone who's researched correct decisions and errors per game from pre VAR to current state VAR, VAR has improved the quantity of correct decisions by over 200% across the board. The premier league has increased quantity of correct decisions by about 400%. The VAR is just an evolving concept that will always make the odd mistake because the VAR is human too.
How else are you suppose to use VAR? It can't spit out a decision for things like penalties. That's a refs judgement
The whole var System is easy to manipulate
@@anonymousperson3023 it helps see if a foul was committed
First one wasn't a goal but then the goalkeeper made an owngoal. Bro lost his neurons in that moment
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It would've been considered a deflection since the original shot was on target.
👍👍
@@muhammadryanelyeddari8631 No, it's considered an own goal since the ball had stopped and he literally pulled it into the goal.
@@LuisCastro-wd5uf It would be a deflection. This happens quite a lot with penalties but the goal still goes toward the penalty taker rather than being classified as an own goal.
A rule in football says that as long as the CURVATURE of the ball doesn’t pass the line, it’s no goal, or no out. This pretty much means that any part of the ball that remains on the line is no goal or no out.
Also, 2 of these clips don’t use VAR
Good info. Thx
What is curvature
Well the last one the entire ball passed so it is a goal
@@miratrb1136 obviously cause it’s a ball the surface level on the floor is very small so instead of being like but the bottom of the ball crossed the line if u looked sky view at the football and the centre of the ball is across the line but the side of the ball is so ever slightly touching the white line it is no goal as the ball is still in “play”
that's why the first one is no goal
The problem is the refs that are blind
Literally in that game of Ronaldos goal there were no VAR and no goal line Technology. 💀😭
We got robbed that day
Talking about convenience that was a rigged game
No imagine ball is cube and it would still be touching line
No you look from side that is problem+ Ronaldo captain shit was sold for money and donated to charity
@@rashidazzan35 how tf was it rigged?
Short answer is YES. VAR doesn't discriminate or show bias... its fair and gives refs a second look to be more accurate with their calls.
seen to often not using it in really difficult situations or, much worse, superclear situations not giving a penalty or opposite.
@@e30325ikiller yeah he’s right they slow down footage so if you do something on accident they think it on purpose. This can get players yellows or red cards
@@Rohan-Golla watch yesterdays stuttgart equalizer in the first half, which was clearly an onside situation, where the "video referee" just said "no goal" the normal referee not even watching the scene again LOL ... beatiful goal though
All of them are goals
@@masonloveu True but at the 1st and 3rd goal there was not even a var present
Its nothing wrong with the VAR. The wrong is the human who don't even tell the truth a.k.a human in that VAR control room.
Well, but thats the same. VAR means WITH humen. How would you do this otherwise?
You could ask EA, that we from now on only play FIFA where the AI does everything.
@@matthiasbachetzky3085 Then youll just complain about the ref? Yall are braindead fr
We Need a machine that Watch the machine. This Is the way.
True, the problems it’s corruption the technology is great for the sport
There s a ship in the ball when it cross the line properly = all the ball ⚽️ the watch of the referee vibrate
All of them were correct decisions if apart from Ronaldo's goal but that game had no VAR and also the referee had a bad angle of the ball
He just didnt see VAR enough
Messi is better than
Penaldo
@@zainahmed1805bro is a master hater 😂
good joke, now delete your youtube account @@zainahmed1805
For those who dont know, in order for the ball to enter another field like an out or a goal, the ball from the upper view should enter all the way from the white line. On the side view it may look like it entered but on the top view it didnt
Yeah but the last 2 were goals cos they went past rhe line, right?
@@rumashahinaakther6868the second to last one no because a hair worth of ball wasn’t over and the last one no cause they didn’t have var in the game
It doesn't matter what the view is... If it goes fully over the line it's a goal, if it doesn't (even by a fraction of a cm) then it isn't.
@@speters17, the view matter because from the side it may look like a goal, but from the upper view it is clearly not a goal
@@bolatkanm But it's the same from the top or the side. The posts and the bar are the same width. If you drew a diagram of it it'd be identical. ==O== from the top and the same but flipped 90° from the side.
The first one actually crossed the line when the goalkeeper picked the ball up
No dip shirlock
No.
It did
@@mr.toastszanyday6320its no shit
@@mr.toastszanyday6320Dude go get your eyes checked
It's called goal line technology
Thanks for the likes!
Bro said "ACKSHUALLY 🤓"
@@JFarmer223it's just the way it is, stop crying
@@JFarmer223 no he didn’t
@@JFarmer223 i think it’s time you went outside my friend and got a job..
@@JFarmer223 goal line technology ≠ VAR
2015: Messi
2017: Ronaldo
2020: Lewandowski Had it
2022: Haaland had the attention
2023: VAR WANT ATTENTION
The first one is a save and an own goal by the goalkeeper
💯
which is funny
that one was decided by goal line tech so no var lol
'That's not fair...you changed the result by measuring it'
Never expected a Futurama reference here
@@shaunthefriendlylesbian2950never expected someone other than me to get it
Great reference btw
@@AgustinBernardo it's a great joke. And in futurama it is in its self a reference to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle... You can't measure a thing without altering the value of the thing you are trying to measure. Multi level referencerama!
no var on that machine and the frist one
How I love the blind judge as much as the hand reaches for the frame
if he crosses the line the goal is not counted, the same works with throw-in
The first one was a goal because when grabbing the ball the goalkeeper puts the ball into the goal XD
The ball was on the line
Nah the ball has to touch the ground inside the goal, the keeper can bring the ball inside the net aslong as it doesn't make contact with the net or grass
@@madmaxplayzgames9452what are you talking about 😂 if you stand a the back of the net and catch the ball.. it’s a goal
@@KCJbomberFTW oh ye I think it's if the ball makes contact with the keeper or the grass inside the net it's a goal but if it just hits the net and comes out it's not, been playing basketball for 5 yrs now haven't watched football since
@madmaxplayzgames9452 as long as the ball legally crosses the line it's a goal.
The ref fucking up has always been a big part of football.
End of conversation
'there were a lot of wrong decisions in the past so we should keep doing wrong decisions instead of improving'
@Pandastic alot of wins and a lot of losses, all based on what the ref didn't see.
That made up a big part of football.
Leave it alone .
fr
True…. But how dumb would it be if one side has all that ‘it’s part of the game’- (un)luck?
I do agree if a VAR takes up 10 minutes and it’s about 1 millimeters it’s totally unnecessary.
It’s a billion euro industry.
@VeniVidiAjax one side has...more than once...
History has been made and broken on it ...
That's football.
That goalie 😂😂😂 that shit made my day😂
Jeroen Zoet, was one of the first matches with goalline technology aswell. Not to mention it being a vital game in the season
It was the best feyenoord became champion that year after 18 years. Thanks jeroen zoet
Made my season a few years ago, Jeroen bedankt🙌🏼
VAR Akem olarak 2 side girdidiyoruz
👇
1st wasn't goal UNTIL gk decided to grab the ball while behind the line. He carried the ball over the line. His fault.
2nd ball travels on the edge of the line, hard to tell by var. Goal line technology would help there. Var is making a judgement call based on perception. Very easily induced in error.
3rd was goal. Not because i'm portuguese, if it was the other way around i would assume the goal anyways.
The ball is kicked after crossing the line.
Again, goal line technology would be essential to clear the doubt.
This being said, neither system is foolproof. Errors will happen, bad decisions will be made even with those systems in place.
U r ryt
As a Serbian, I would not say ball passed goal line 3rd video 😂😂
I'm not Portuguese and I agree the 3rd one I can clearly see the ball cross the line fully
3rd is goal but there was not var bcs it was qualificaations and var was not available for use rules were rules referee said no goal he cant check it not his bad
Ronaldo scorer
You only hate VAR if it costs your team, but then complain when refs miss things
We need a VAR for the VAR referees 💀
Yes
😂 but yes they are dumb
Yess
@@Mr_FST9 they are not dumb the most times they are paid
@@chxris9132 no mate.
Yes, the VAR is helping football❤
The cancellation of Ronaldo's goal may not have saved the match, but it did save the life of a child struggling with death
? Can you elaborate?
@@blessedslave Ronaldo got angry and threw his captain band.
Later a random dude picked it up and sold it in an auction.His son had cancer and was about to die so he used the money to his little child.
Everything happens for a reason
@@reyn8828its not his son
@@Kreno_Lahhe meant the son of the dude not ronaldo son bro
My favorite soccer quote of all time is “the camera angle lies” there’s no definitive proof that any of these could be changed based on the angle the camera was placed except the keeper where he clearly brought it in and had a perfectly sideways angle to prove it
soccer?
Wtf is Soccer ? It is called Football you american
what is soccer? something is wrong here
@@dark-fw9fz complaining about how a ball is called is stupid
@@Patrick_Raelow it's called football stupid
bro is just into football and feels like he's a professional
Bro is a wee band acts like he knows japanese
Sometimes it helped, sometimes it don't.
The Ronaldo one was heartbreaking
As a Portuguese im still mad asf but it isn't the fact it wasn't a goal, it was the fact there were no VAR in that game, absolute joke, funny enough after that game they put VAR in World Cup qualifiers again
He acted like a child
@@Fiat_Multipla69 are you ok or what? What else and how else do you expect a player to act when a national match goal is disallowed? Just smile and walk away?
@Rishi He threw the captain's armband on the ground, no real captain does that.
@@Fiat_Multipla69 is there a rulebook for that or what?
With the first one VAR had nothing to do with it! Goalline technology it's called. The ball has a chip and when it crosses the line the referee's watch start to vibrate saying it's a goal. Still thanking goalie Jeroen Zoet for making this mistake.😂
Jeroen sweet
My feeling exactly.
VAR wasnt even used back then xd
Essa tecnologia só foi começada a ser usada na copa do mundo de 2022, antes não tinha chip nas bolas. Vc tá bem desinformado!
Actually the goal shouldn't count because the ref had already blown his whistle when the GK pulled the ball over the line.
First one with a 200 IQ moment
Refree is fake now is a refree😢😮😮
The first 2 decisions seem legit. The third one I'm not sure from this angle
they're all legit, he's just too stupid to ever understand the rules
If the first is legit, why is the second legit?
Third game had no var dude 😭
@@deBrilly the edge of the ball stayed on the line, only slightly but it stayed...
@@jadel-khoury5531 So can you explain - if the fault happens on the line of the penalty area and referee calls a free kick, can i put a ball inside the penalty area if the edge of a ball is on the line?
Goal line technology had been a brilliant addition to football. Has worked almost flawlessly, with maybe 3 incorrect decisions in 10 years
And make an incorrect decision with cr7 goal
@@guizaoal898 yeah I'd included that in the 3 mistakes it's made. And I'm not even using 3 as a definite answer, could be 6 or 7 because I don't know everything about every game. Its still a lot better now than glaringly obvious goals that should have stood being wiped off, lampards England goal, the goal Roy Carroll 'saved a yard over the line' and that's just thinking of 2 at the top of my head.
@@adamjones2564 yeah, we can’t blame the thecnology at all, the chances to it make a mistake is like 0,01%
There was no goal line technology during that match because it was a unimprtant match :) thank you
@@guizaoal898 serbian stadium didnt have goal line technology.
It might let you down sometimes but it completely works with "standard" so the fans have to get used to it.
Var is awesome for stuff like dives and offside goals. The problem are the plays that still require “interpretation “ but those plays suck with and without VAR
Rocket league be like… that last save is a epic save that’s an mvp if I’ve ever seen one.
The last save was a goal but the Serbian stadium they were playing in did not have var or goal line technology
for the first goal, the goalkeeper pulled it to his chest which was in the net making it a goal. for the 2nd one the WHOLE ball has to be across the line and it looks different from different angles. for the ronaldo one, var didnt even exist back then, thats one of the reasons why it was implemented.
Bro no way 1st one was a goal and 2nd one was not 0 ball knowledge
@@Vardridispayingrefswtf do you mean
second clip fr reminded me of gagamaru's save
Who the heck is gagamaru 🤣🤣
@@Sinnables if you read Blue lock, in the u20 match gagamarus save was insane.
Man i am a messi fan but i feel bad for Ronaldos no goal but happy at the same time, after that he rage and left his Captain bracelet wich was taken and sold for miney that used to help a little child in need!
Bets are also made in the background clearly 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Remember
The *Whole* ball has to cross the line for a goal
Yea and the whole ball went in besides the first one
@@gigachad7302 gotta remember camera angles are everything. One angle makes it look in the other shows part is still on the line. Kyle walkers clearance against Liverpool as an example.
The *projection* of the whole ball should cross the line for a goal.
Let's not forget the WC 2022 game Japan-Spain.
@@gigachad7302 it did
*'' You're all against me."*
-C. Ronaldo-😂
Var:-don't disturb. This is sleeping tym😂😂
Making debut as professional footbal spectator
Bro the first one was own goal ☠️
They need to change var, to slow mo video.
it's not about helping but it's about the one that seeing var will helping you or not😂
A few mistakes do not cancel out how many good things has happened. People got red cards and got red cards taken away… it gave PK and took
Lets be honest VAR is the worst thing to happen to the premier league. No room for error so instead they continuously make embarrassing calls
Refree didnt have VAR available in these matches, so he went and checked his bank acocunt instead 😅✌️
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Bruh... The best fucking comment. It crapped f*CK out of ne😂😂😂😂
😂
I'm a Referee myself and something that a lot a people miss understand is the ball can be not touching the line and still be in as long as it is over the line it's not a goal
It's called, getting paid to make a team win
It's called having no goal line technology during that match
Its called, there was no VAR
Pertama, saat bola di garis mungkin belum goal tetapi saat bola dipeluk oleh kiper bisa jadi itu goal. ✌️🙏
Ball has to be 100% over the line…..99% is not a goal
@@mattco2900 masalahnya bola didalam pelukan kiper dan kejadian relatif cepat sehingga perlu di cek lagi apakah 100% melewati garis atau tidak. Itulah yang menyebabkan saya berkata mungkin terjadi gol (bukan pasti gol)
“Only counts when the ball is full over the line from seen up above persoective”
Cristiano threw his captain's armband on the ground, a firefighter auctioned it off and with the money saved a baby who needed expensive treatment
Bro, football rules say the ball needs to be 100% percent in the post before it is considered as a goal.
And last 2 completely went in
@@Respectbothgoats 2nd one is unclear.
Bro showed a clip of the liga MX👍
Var helped in all situations.
Cr7 precisou perder esse gol para uma vida ser salva...
Dans certains championnats il n'y a pas la Goal Line technology
Toutes les grandes cinq ligues ,il y a technologie de but
@@ibitorucookey-gam7503 No todo son las 5 grandes ligas
@@ibitorucookey-gam7503 Además son partidos viejos
Last clip ÇR7 scored, that's goal
Bro nobody cares
@@the_dude2740 quiet plz
Yeah i really hate VAR one day my country played vs romania in euro 2024 qualifiers and my country scored a winning goal i was so happy but it was offside and it was the score 0-0
@pepsidoggie428 So you are mad because it was the right call interesting
As a Serb which we played against Portugal, i agree on this one it should have been a goal but the reason why it wasn't is because it's hard to determine the angle with no VAR and also because our player decided to save it, if he didn't went for it referee would say Goal, just bcz our player went for it was enough to call it off
All of those were goals, no discussion....👍👍👍
On 11th of June this happened with Indian team totally robbed by Qatar 🤬🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡
In football doesn't need Var but ONLY CAMERAMAN
Wrong, VAR helps on closer looks, referee's could just be talking bs otherwise
Honestly FIFA and UEFA are pretty rich they have hire two extra refs to stand next to the goal to check if its goal or not cuz sometimes VAR is sleeping
Its goal line technology you clown.
Goal is goal bro thats it.
Well this certainly was a useful contribution to this video...
Thanks Mr.Holmes
The number two is true not a goal
Its because the ball is closer out the line
Soccer has needed gold line cameras for so long. There’s so many instances of major games that have been won and lost in situations like this, and it was all just based off of the lineman’s or refs call from a horrible vantage point.
wtf is soccer man
There's goal line technology available. In the first clip that is what happens. The goal line technology registers the ball passing the line and a signal is goes of on the referees watch.
What's soccer
The answer is a resounding "Yes". The game is too fast to make the correct decision in a lot of occasions. In a game that can be decided by a single goal that is significant.
We need robots not people. People have biases. Robots do not.
That's a lie,i didn't and never will
We can’t help that refs are blind and make bad calls😡
That last one with the slide-kick out, was 100% a goal. It was a 100% over the line.
This is a manipulative video. That game was not using VAR. Most games in this clip weren't using VAR. Also, goal line technology is used to determine goals, not VAR
Yeah but cmon its on our turf in serbia of course portugal wasnt gonna get that call, it aint fair but thats how it is
Imaginate a cristiano le quitan los goles y messi se los dan con penales
In school, the ball has to touch the net for it to be in😂
Var should be an AI.
The reason why it looks like it was a goal in several cases is due of the angle of the camera. When you look at it from the top, you see the ball is still in play.
Ind vs qatar fifa qualifers same case happened
VAR and Goal Line Technology weren’t on use for that last one, how are you blaming it on VAR?
Goal line tech definitely helps
Ronaldo freaking scored that goal
Yes
If you want to see the biggest compilation of VAR helping a team, just watch how they helped Argentina in Qatar 2022
It’s not just var the ref is the one who makes the decisions in the end
😂😂 isn't true var is the mafia of football that decide and say what the compagnies of gambling say to them cancell goal or accept goal refree is like a toy just running😂😂😂
It’s called corruption
Like u know a thing kid 😅
@@blackshark2414 as if u know all child 😂
@@Nvk95729 child
@@username04792 premature baby 😂
I think it should be " What VAR is trying to prevent"
In none of those occasions is it a goal, until you see the last one
For more than 30 I've believed that there were different rules for sidelines and goal lines. I looked through old official rules to see when a goal stopped being just half the ball passing the goal line.
Незасчитаный гол Марко Девича в ворота сборной Англии
Bro, I swear in 2030 they will not be VAR anymore😂😂😂
Var=Bahis kontrol bürosu
Either way the last one was a great save
They only use it for useless stuff like an offiside or an foul, but not in a serious situation like a goal in a final !
(Like Wydad VS T.Taraji in The african champions league)
Or Franck Lampard,Cristiano Ronaldo...