I’ve been using the same theme with the small yubel package. I just don’t agree with keeping the card count that close to 40. What you’re really doing is watering down the main engine at the cost of drawing the yubel engine more. Which isn’t a great trade off. Yubel is a great way to resolve branded fusion or create disruption or super poly boards…. But it’s not so important to hurt branded. If you draw into yubel great. If you don’t that’s fine too. But with that few of cards you lose tech cards. You risk drawing into bricks or doubles. And imo most of all you risk drawing cards you don’t want to. Like your only quem which you prefer to ss and use your normal Summon on something else. At this point I think it’s pretty standard to have 2 quem and 2-3 cart. At least 2 cart. Ideally 3. The best I think this deck can operate at is 45. But I think 50 is the best of both worlds if you really wanna draw yubel. I’ve personally been running it at 55-54
thanks bro for sharing and advising me, yes adding yubel as engine it means you have sacrifice some branded engine like fusion deployment thrust or any else, but i already told to my viewer i have intention to make different branded deck like 40,50 and 60, so we can choose which one is better for branded yubel 🙏 to be honest i prefer to build 48 cards with branded yubel, i already have that deck including samsara as engine, i might post 48-50 version next week 🙏 i love the version of branded yubel since i need a card that can break the board without requirement like same atribute or same type 😆,
@@gus421 to be honest, against yubel with branded is kinda difficult, since most of yubel cards can counter branded, but adding handtrap like imperm or book of eclipse are good agains them, i will try to update my pure banded decklist and make new gameplay soon 🙏
@@GambitMasterDuel I know. I could won once due I had super poly, bystials and mercourier in hand otherwise I'd had lost, the rest of the matchs I lost
@@gus421 to be honest, adding gimmick puppet on this current meta is a mandatory, most of branded user is considering to add it, but i will try another version without gimmick and will uplod the gameplay soon
@@GambitMasterDuel 60 cards branded stand good chance beating yubel, if our grass resolves 😂😂 i broke one 3 mat Apollousa with S:P little knight Yubel board, but my grass was bad mill😂
@@midoudarkhell47 both of them are good i think, if you use branded yubel you can get extra protecting from ash or nibiru with phantom of yubel but i still prefer the pure one (branded despia)
In my opinion if you have a good hand to get the phantom of yubel negate then you good bro and i feel like the branded deck that have gimmick puppet lock more consistent so i more comfortable with the gimmick one
@@eltonbranco8288 i still love pure branded bro, no matter the situation, pure branded despia is till the best for me 🙏, but in the current meta you need add more handtrap like imperm to beat yubel but adding yubel is not bad idea since you can protect your combo from ash blosom,
@@GambitMasterDuelMr Gambit I have Royal Rare blue Albion 0 quem & no chimera or grunge no furious I had to craft regular Albion + branded fusion now it's semi playable pulling 2 DPE from packs is fine after I crafted one! 😂
Branded banishment with yubel fusion, super powerful 😆😆
yes, now i have the answer for breaking all of opponenr board without same attribute or same type 😆
I’ve been using the same theme with the small yubel package.
I just don’t agree with keeping the card count that close to 40.
What you’re really doing is watering down the main engine at the cost of drawing the yubel engine more. Which isn’t a great trade off.
Yubel is a great way to resolve branded fusion or create disruption or super poly boards…. But it’s not so important to hurt branded.
If you draw into yubel great. If you don’t that’s fine too.
But with that few of cards you lose tech cards. You risk drawing into bricks or doubles.
And imo most of all you risk drawing cards you don’t want to. Like your only quem which you prefer to ss and use your normal Summon on something else.
At this point I think it’s pretty standard to have 2 quem and 2-3 cart. At least 2 cart. Ideally 3.
The best I think this deck can operate at is 45. But I think 50 is the best of both worlds if you really wanna draw yubel.
I’ve personally been running it at 55-54
thanks bro for sharing and advising me, yes adding yubel as engine it means you have sacrifice some branded engine like fusion deployment thrust or any else, but i already told to my viewer i have intention to make different branded deck like 40,50 and 60, so we can choose which one is better for branded yubel 🙏
to be honest i prefer to build 48 cards with branded yubel, i already have that deck including samsara as engine, i might post 48-50 version next week 🙏
i love the version of branded yubel since i need a card that can break the board without requirement like same atribute or same type 😆,
May i ask whats your current rank?
@@Goku-Kid halo bro goku, iam at diamond 🙏
Minute 6:39 was simply beautiful, no matter had to leave.
@@gus421 thanks bro, my child was calling me, so i had to stop the game 🙏
how do you beat Yubel with branded? besides using puppet lock
@@gus421 to be honest, against yubel with branded is kinda difficult, since most of yubel cards can counter branded, but adding handtrap like imperm or book of eclipse are good agains them,
i will try to update my pure banded decklist and make new gameplay soon 🙏
@@GambitMasterDuel I know. I could won once due I had super poly, bystials and mercourier in hand otherwise I'd had lost, the rest of the matchs I lost
@@gus421 to be honest, adding gimmick puppet on this current meta is a mandatory, most of branded user is considering to add it, but i will try another version without gimmick and will uplod the gameplay soon
@@GambitMasterDuel 60 cards branded stand good chance beating yubel, if our grass resolves 😂😂 i broke one 3 mat Apollousa with S:P little knight Yubel board, but my grass was bad mill😂
@@relaxgaming29 yes, i already have 60 cards gameplay, and i will upload it soon after yubel 🙏
Better then pure branded?
@@midoudarkhell47 both of them are good i think, if you use branded yubel you can get extra protecting from ash or nibiru with phantom of yubel
but i still prefer the pure one (branded despia)
@@GambitMasterDuel thanks bro
❤️👏
Nice dude
@@coollionboy3887 thankss broo
GG🎉
@@dimaspanca5248 thankss
In your opinion, do you think this combination with Yubel is more powerful than your Pure Branded deck?
In my opinion if you have a good hand to get the phantom of yubel negate then you good bro and i feel like the branded deck that have gimmick puppet lock more consistent so i more comfortable with the gimmick one
@@eltonbranco8288 i still love pure branded bro, no matter the situation, pure branded despia is till the best for me 🙏, but in the current meta you need add more handtrap like imperm to beat yubel
but adding yubel is not bad idea since you can protect your combo from ash blosom,
@@GambitMasterDuelMr Gambit I have Royal Rare blue Albion 0 quem & no chimera or grunge no furious I had to craft regular Albion + branded fusion now it's semi playable pulling 2 DPE from packs is fine after I crafted one! 😂
I gotta try this out
@@Mr_Phantom880 thankss, i have two version, yubel as extender or yubel as main combo, 🙏😆
@@GambitMasterDuel Update: After giving the deck a shot, I won 14 games in a row in platinum 😂
@@GambitMasterDuel Also please upload the other version please.
@@Mr_Phantom880 yes bro i will try upload it after yubel gameplay tonighy
@@Mr_Phantom880 nice to hear that bro 🙏, phantom of yubel is our branded support 😆🙏
Can you just use the word "opponent" instead of "enemy"?
nah yes bro, that is my bad habit, i always consider my opponent as enemy 😆🙏, thanks for the advice i will revise it for next video 🙏
@@GambitMasterDuel yeah, i was wondering what enemy mean, need a second to realise its mean opponent. Btw new subscriber here
@@isaidmaybeee haha iam sorry bro 🙏, and thanks bro for the support 🙏