Why Did Medieval People Love Sheep So Much? | Tudor Monastery Farm | Chronicle

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 авг 2022
  • The Tudor industry of wool production was known as `the jewel in the realm' of the English economy, it accounted for around half the country's wealth. The monasteries capitalized on this massively, owning flocks that numbered thousands of sheep and keeping a virtual monopoly on the export of wool to foreign countries.
    Welcome to Chronicle; your home for all things medieval history! With documentaries covering everything from the collapse of the Roman Empire to the beginnings of the Renaissance, from Hastings to Charlemagne, we'll be exploring everything the Middle Ages have to offer.
    Subscribe now so you don't miss out!
    Chronicle is part of the History Hit Network. To get in touch please email owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
    It's like Netflix for history... 📺 Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'CHRONICLE' 👉 bit.ly/3iVCZNl

Комментарии • 166

  • @kaylakashtiban8340
    @kaylakashtiban8340 Год назад +60

    I think Ruth is wonderful. She gets so excited and gets a little sparkle in her eye and a whisper in her voice.

    • @dickJohnsonpeter
      @dickJohnsonpeter 4 месяца назад

      It's cistern tragedy my dear lady. We have to buckle her up and stand at attention for that particular hour. I will the scapegoat there. Ruth is a booth. Stick it under there good day.

  • @loricharley1671
    @loricharley1671 Год назад +28

    Ruth by far is my favorite person. She is so smart and knows so much about the things she teaches, and looks so happy doing it! Love these documentaries, you guys are great!

  • @diblik
    @diblik 2 года назад +76

    I really appreciate that everyone gets in character for this show

    • @johnadams5245
      @johnadams5245 2 года назад +1

      dont u think this is a theft? they didnt even give them any credit to the people who made this docu

    • @alyh3721
      @alyh3721 Год назад +1

      It has its own Wikipedia page that lists the historians/reenactors! You can also get it on DVD (not if it is available outside the UK) :)

  • @diy_nailsby_heidi_r3889
    @diy_nailsby_heidi_r3889 Год назад +21

    Tom & Peter have their own humor, but Ruth can make almost anything seem fun!

  • @veselinnedkov643
    @veselinnedkov643 Год назад +9

    Look at them, the big nerds. Living the dream nerd life. Wonderful series.

  • @byzcath
    @byzcath 2 года назад +26

    I love this series in so many different ways, from the immersion of everyone into the character and time, and their love for the period.

  • @jlux4481
    @jlux4481 Год назад +9

    Her laugh is contagious. Love this series

  • @Rodelero
    @Rodelero Год назад +8

    This series has been the definition of delightful for me.i have the whole playlist saved . thank you for uploading this

  • @RandomMikayla
    @RandomMikayla 2 года назад +30

    I loved the sheep resting its head on his lap as he sheared it haha. Amazing video, extremely information and super interesting!

  • @user-lh1wr9sr8m
    @user-lh1wr9sr8m Год назад +7

    Finally, a documentary all about medieval Welshmen

  • @carocatho
    @carocatho Год назад +6

    The amount of practical knowledge Ruth has is quite impressive!! And she brings in so much passion and enthusiasm, it makes the program just the more interesting. 👍

  • @Stevens7123
    @Stevens7123 Год назад +4

    this series is so wholesome in so many ways

  • @Amtcboy
    @Amtcboy Год назад +4

    I have seen Ruth’s face many times in many medieval paintings.

  • @Branwhin
    @Branwhin Год назад +10

    Aww, the little goose booties! This would be SO much fun. So much work, but I would love to participate in something like this.

  • @gic8849
    @gic8849 Год назад +12

    Those sheep went in cleaner than they came out 😂😂

  • @terryt.1643
    @terryt.1643 5 месяцев назад +1

    When we shear our sheep we skirt and wash the wool afterward. The prime wool is spun, the other used for felting. Goats and sheep were both milked to make cheese. Loved this.

  • @lizzy66125
    @lizzy66125 Год назад +2

    I love all the people investing their time and experience to keep all these practises /trades alive ,so that we can see how the lives of the ordinary people were,instead of only focussing on the nobles ,kings and queens.

  • @krbailess
    @krbailess Год назад +6

    I never saw anything about sleep. Because of all the work? Maybe I missed it. I did, however, really enjoy watching.

    • @krbailess
      @krbailess Год назад +3

      Oh my stars, ha! It’s SHEEP not SLEEP. (I just put my contacts in). 🙃

    • @Kitty666EmoGoth
      @Kitty666EmoGoth Год назад +3

      @@krbailess 🤣🤣🤣I read "Sheep" in your comment and was like: wtf, there were sheep everywhere!

  • @downtime86stars17
    @downtime86stars17 Год назад +4

    I want that spinning wheel. And the loom...

  • @samaraisnt
    @samaraisnt Год назад +2

    20:30 steam
    39:00 spinning
    50:00 making wool fluffy
    stretching 51:20

  • @DerekSelvon
    @DerekSelvon 2 года назад +7

    Everything is so clean lol

    • @roderickclerk5904
      @roderickclerk5904 2 месяца назад

      Medieval people took baths at least once a week. And they would have washed they’re face everyday

  • @joanhuffman2166
    @joanhuffman2166 Год назад +7

    Choices available in medieval Europe; flax/linen nice texture but not good in cool weather, hemp source of fiber for canvas, not good for cool weather and really rough in texture with the processing methods available at the time, and wool good for cold weather and tougher than linen, nettle, again not warm enough and lots of extra work to process.

  • @PhantomQueenOne
    @PhantomQueenOne Год назад +4

    I'm so glad you can now use a washer to full wool. And no urine either. You can use urea, which is synthetic urine. I just use Original Dawn dish soap to scour the wool and set the twist.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад +1

      urea isn't synthetic urine. urea is a chemical. urine does have urea in it, but they're not the same thing.

    • @PhantomQueenOne
      @PhantomQueenOne Год назад +1

      @@sethescope "About Synthetic Urea: How Was It Discovered, Who Did, And How Is It Manufactured Commercially
      by Ben Bareja
      Last Updated April 13, 2022
      Synthetic urea refers to the urea that is produced artificially as distinguished from biosynthetic or natural urea.
      It is an industrial product that has found many applications but primarily as nitrogen fertilizer.
      Also described as synthetic or chemical fertilizer, it is an organic compound that is manufactured following an industrial process independent of living organisms.
      Natural and manufactured urea have the same chemical formula CO(NH2)2.
      However, natural urea is produced by living organisms, specifically, humans, other mammals, and other ureotelic organisms (excretes most nitrogen as urea; Mathews and Van Holde 1990) and subsequently excreted mostly in the urine.
      Pure urea was isolated from urine many years ago."

    • @PhantomQueenOne
      @PhantomQueenOne Год назад

      "The Discovery of Urea
      The discovery of natural urea preceded that of synthetic urea but the who and when seems not clearly established.
      The French chemist Hilaire Marin Rouelle (1718-1779) is commonly cited as the one who discovered urea.
      Accordingly, he isolated those colorless, odorless, crystalline substances in 1773 by boiling urine (Myers 2007).
      In 1797, French chemists Antoine François de Fourcroy (1755-1809) and Louis Nicolas Vauquelin (1763-1829) named the substance “urea” (Richet 1988).
      However, Dutch physician-chemist Hermann Boerhaave (1668-1738) seems to have described urea much earlier.
      According to Rosenfeld (2003), even before 1727 Boerhaave already obtained a crystalline residue from urine by heating, filtering, washing, and evaporating.
      He called it “the native salt of urine.”
      He noted that it differed from the sea salt (sodium chloride) which is also present in urine.
      Further, according to the same author, Rouelle’s extract was impure, and it was British physician-chemist William Prout (1785-1850) who, in 1817, isolated pure urea from urine.
      The Beginning of Synthetic Urea
      In 1828, German chemist Friedrich Wöhler (1800-1882) produced synthetic urea in the laboratory from inorganic compounds.
      He first heated a solution consisting of a mixture of silver cyanate (AgOCN) and ammonium chloride (NH4Cl).
      As shown below, this formed ammonium cyanate is also an inorganic compound (does not originate from living organisms).
      AgOCN + NH4Cl --> NH4OCN (ammonium cyanate) + AgCl
      But when ammonium cyanate was further heated, it produced clear, colorless, crystalline urea which has the same characteristics as urinary urea.
      It turned out that ammonium cyanate and urea have the same elemental composition (CH4N2O) and that heating of ammonium cyanate (NH4OCN) caused the atoms to rearrange resulting to its transformation into urea (H2N.CO.NH2).
      Wöhler’s teacher, Jöns Jacob Berzelius (1779-1848) who coined the term organic chemistry in 1807 for the study of compounds naturally produced by living organisms, likewise invented the term isomerism to describe the relation of distinct materials having identical elemental composition.
      Apparently, Wohler also discovered that an inorganic compound (ammonium cyanate) can be an isomer of an organic compound (urea).
      It was the first time that a substance of biological origin was synthesized artificially from inorganic compounds.
      It eventually led to a drastic change in the definition of organic compounds and to the birth of synthetic organic chemistry.
      Organic chemistry is now defined as the study of carbon compounds or carbon-containing compounds (Mark and the Editors of Time-Life Books 1966; Carey 1992; Myers 2007)."

  • @SaguaroBlossom
    @SaguaroBlossom 2 года назад +10

    Didn't anyone ever tell those guys not to count your chickens (or geese) before they hatch?

    • @grandmachickenscluckingoodsoap
      @grandmachickenscluckingoodsoap Год назад +1

      I've found my geese are crap at successfully hatching eggs. I hatch them myself if I want to add to my flock

    • @apolloniusbeitsman5444
      @apolloniusbeitsman5444 Год назад

      Don't think people could count in those days.

    • @splatterkat3838
      @splatterkat3838 Год назад +2

      @@apolloniusbeitsman5444 They could count, yes. Especially the business savvy farmer and landowner. It's unfortunately a very common misconception that the common folk couldn't count. Otherwise, how would they sell or buy goods?

  • @lunaflamed
    @lunaflamed Год назад +1

    Have watched this video and it's series MANY TIME!!
    ALWAYS something useful to glean from it in an inspiring and entertaining way!!
    THANK YOU!

  • @CoralRaeAllDay
    @CoralRaeAllDay 8 месяцев назад

    Anyone else have the sudden “ah-ha!” realization this is the curds and whey little Miss Muffet eats in the nursery rhyme? 😮

  • @lostboyrc623
    @lostboyrc623 Год назад +3

    Saints are not taught to be worshipped, but to be venerated (dulia) for intercessions

  • @sarahnixdorf1
    @sarahnixdorf1 Год назад +2

    For the history nuts, I adore this show.😍

  • @joe-vl3nd
    @joe-vl3nd Год назад +3

    Great show

  • @marinusvisser
    @marinusvisser 2 года назад +2

    Wonderful

  • @Zcoc
    @Zcoc 2 года назад +1

    Loved it

  • @shannitoburrito
    @shannitoburrito Год назад +4

    I feel like the washing part just got them muddy 😂

    • @coop5329
      @coop5329 Год назад

      And the scrubbing part? That's how you turn fleece into felt! Agitate wet wool! Depending on how much scrubbing they did, they could have a heck of a time trying to card the stuff. Once felted, that's permanent!

    • @MrSheckstr
      @MrSheckstr Год назад +1

      Two things to consider
      1 washing was about getting out months if not an entire years worth of matting of the wool. By comparison the silted mud of the pond bottom would be relatively minor.
      HOWEVER i cannot stress hard enough how their improvised and amateurish efforts would not have been tolerated by a career shepherd.
      A career shepherd of that time would have had a lifetime of experience at the craft, and the lifetimes of experience from their predecessors and the tools and furniture etc would have been well thought out. A stagnant pond would never have been even considered, instead a flowing stream with a down stream sheep gate and board ramp to boost the sheep onto and exit cleanly into a dry and sunny meadow.
      It would have been a team effort of multiple shepherd families and other helpers and any sheep that was not clean enough would have had a second dunking. Also washing might have occurred once a week for a whole month before sheering. These three were mostly going through the motions without their livelihood depending on the best possible outcome of their efforts

  • @catherinemartina6469
    @catherinemartina6469 Год назад +2

    When we milk cows we use a small container and poured in a big container that with the milk stays clean you wouldn’t put the big container under the cow because she swags her tail and kicks and does everything else same with the sheep I would think

  • @wonderwinder1
    @wonderwinder1 Год назад +1

    Ruth looks like she stepped out of a time machine.

  • @Teresa-ih4sn
    @Teresa-ih4sn 2 года назад +11

    How fun to be able to literally go back in time.

    • @wonderwinder1
      @wonderwinder1 Год назад +2

      Hell no! Not unless I can take antibiotics with me.

  • @annesummers09
    @annesummers09 Год назад +1

    Would like to have seen clothing the farmers wore at that time. :)

  • @dickJohnsonpeter
    @dickJohnsonpeter 4 месяца назад

    Sheep were separated by breeds way before Tudor times. Even in stone age Britain they were imported from Italy. We recognized and changed breeds in the dark ages and medieval times. I read about it.

  • @dianadeedy1025
    @dianadeedy1025 Год назад +1

    Ruth should be declared a Living Human Treasure…

  • @lizzy66125
    @lizzy66125 Год назад

    love Peter Ginn and Professor Hutton.

  • @chrispbacon3042
    @chrispbacon3042 Год назад +1

    Blessed are the cheese makers.

  • @docstockandbarrel
    @docstockandbarrel 2 года назад +3

    For the same reason they’re liked in other parts of the world… 👀

  • @rebeccaherschman1635
    @rebeccaherschman1635 Год назад

    Th is is the only reality based show I've ever wanted to be on!

  • @beverleyheadley-glover371
    @beverleyheadley-glover371 2 года назад +8

    I would like to know how they safeguarded there sheep from diseases???

    • @kevinroche3334
      @kevinroche3334 Год назад

      9:50

    • @Butchinthewaikato
      @Butchinthewaikato Год назад +1

      Basically, the same way they safeguarded themselves from diseases; they couldn't, so they didn't. You were lucky if half your babies survived childhood, and you were old at 40.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад +2

      @@Butchinthewaikato I disagree. they didn't understand how disease actually worked, but they still tried to prevent it based on their limited understanding and with the tools they had available. one way they tried to keep themselves safe was drinking more ale and less water. they didn't understand what made some water less safe to drink because they didn't understand bacteria, but they did know that sometimes water made people sick, so they tended to drink more ale because people didn't get as sick when they drank that.
      there's also a lot of examples throughout history of people trying to keep themselves and their living environments as clean as they could. they didn't know why, but they did know people got sicker when they were in dirty conditions, so cleaning was an attempt to prevent illness.

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      Prayer. Useless prayer.

  • @carmelmulroy6459
    @carmelmulroy6459 Год назад

    Those geese are so cute.

  • @UnitSe7en
    @UnitSe7en Год назад +1

    "Thanks, Highness! Sheep have many uses."

  • @kevinjones8745
    @kevinjones8745 Год назад +2

    This was the time when," Men were Men, and 🐑 were SCARED".... 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @blimby2416
    @blimby2416 Год назад

    22:52 POV: you're mad at your cheese.

  • @beverleyheadley-glover371
    @beverleyheadley-glover371 2 года назад +4

    Sorry, any farmer and families were allowed any types if schooling ?

    • @beverleyheadley-glover371
      @beverleyheadley-glover371 2 года назад +1

      Where is the answer if any? Thanks.

    • @susanmercurio1060
      @susanmercurio1060 2 года назад +2

      If they had an extra son, he might be sent to a monastery.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад +1

      formal schooling would have been very rare for farmers and for most people at the time. that being said, just because they didn't have formal schooling doesn't mean they didn't learn things. most people would have learned some very basic math so they could buy and sell things at markets. but education for most people would have been focused on gaining knowledge to help them survive. formal schooling would have been a waste of time for most people because they needed to be working on the farm so they wouldn't starve.

  • @jonathantilas8507
    @jonathantilas8507 Год назад +1

    They didn’t worship saints, but prayed that the saints interceded on their behalf to God. BIG difference

  • @ulrikjensen6841
    @ulrikjensen6841 Год назад

    "Merry England" - or better: "Merry old England" I am sure took place in 1700 and forth. Isn't this feature closer to "renaissance"?

  • @georgiafan775
    @georgiafan775 2 года назад +38

    Haven't watched yet but my guess is they didn't have cotton.

    • @voraciousreader3341
      @voraciousreader3341 Год назад +25

      @georgiafan - No. Cotton hadn’t been introduced and wasn’t ever going to be introduced to Britain bc the climate was (and is) completely wrong for growing it. People in the UK and Ireland grew flax to make linen, which was their version of cotton. Linen has been in use for thousands of years in countries all over the world.

    • @gailhandschuh1138
      @gailhandschuh1138 Год назад +6

      Sheep gave them meat to eat, an fleece for clothing plus they provided a saleable product for trade. Much like if’s there was more usable products for the family.

    • @skippymagrue
      @skippymagrue Год назад +3

      It's too cold there to grow.

    • @downtime86stars17
      @downtime86stars17 Год назад +5

      @@billysunday7507Sorry to burst your racist bubble, but plenty of white people also picked cotton.

    • @dadbod9776
      @dadbod9776 Год назад +1

      Georgia fan….haven’t watched it yet but I’d like to put in my racial agitation mentality asap.
      Why was cotton, sugar and tobacco ever produced. Africans would have still been in Africa. How amazing would that be?

  • @Benjamin-ew3hk
    @Benjamin-ew3hk Год назад

    why is there multiple copies of the same video but with different names and thumbnails?

  • @g-dub1553
    @g-dub1553 Год назад +12

    That was an INSANE amount of rennet for that milk. You only need 1/4 tsp. or 1tsp per 20 liters. Sheeesh that cheese is going to taste bitter

    • @UnitSe7en
      @UnitSe7en Год назад +3

      It's kind of silly to be watching amateurs do these tasks under the guise of education.

    • @neymarmessironaldo5881
      @neymarmessironaldo5881 Год назад

      haha, the more you know

    • @ericlipscomb4764
      @ericlipscomb4764 Год назад +4

      I'm guessing it was diluted, or was a weaker homebrew extraction.

    • @gcastellano87
      @gcastellano87 Год назад +6

      Medieval extraction methods were far less sophisticated than modern rennet extraction, so it looks like more but is more diluted

    • @cindyleehaddock3551
      @cindyleehaddock3551 Год назад +3

      Nah, probably poorly made rennet, much more dilute than modern, so you needed more. I can't see our lady house woman making that big a goof. Also, in another episode I saw her adding a huge amount of spice, but back then it was probably so old you had to add gobs to get any flavor, just like that really old bottle of spice many of us have on our shelves....😁

  • @P.e.m.a.
    @P.e.m.a. 2 года назад +2

    Probably cuz they didnt have cameras for cat videos yet 🤩

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      Imagine the boredom. Zero cat videos, no one to hear your complaints of being oppressed, no unboxing or selfies by the somewhat attractive.

  • @clydepiper4046
    @clydepiper4046 Год назад +1

    The sheep looked dirtier as they left the water : )

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      Pretending that pushing sheep in a mud hole cleans them works for TV.

  • @ShortBusScotty
    @ShortBusScotty Год назад

    They don't get headaches?

  • @henrijs1733
    @henrijs1733 Год назад

    best medieval group since the Hobbits

  • @stevep5408
    @stevep5408 Год назад

    Did they make butter out of sheep's milk?

    • @dawsie
      @dawsie Год назад

      No only cheese, both sheep and goats were used to make curds and whey not sure why they never made butter other than it would take about 10-15 large ewes compared to only one cow.

  • @patricialong5767
    @patricialong5767 Год назад

    I'd never make a good sheep farmer because i think sheep are incredibly stupid! LOL The Tudor technology in this video is truly astounding for the times! Wow!

  • @jannetteberends8730
    @jannetteberends8730 Год назад +3

    This video is NOT about MEDIEVAL PEOPLE. it’s about Medieval English people. That’s a huge difference. May be you didn’t know this: There were medieval people in other countries as well!!!

    • @albertoalejandrelara515
      @albertoalejandrelara515 Год назад

      So anglocentric.

    • @GuildofGentlemen
      @GuildofGentlemen Год назад +7

      It’s an English show. Get over it.

    • @downtime86stars17
      @downtime86stars17 Год назад +6

      So you're appalled that a show produced in England covers the history of England? Do you think before you write anything?

    • @downtime86stars17
      @downtime86stars17 Год назад +1

      @@albertoalejandrelara515I sincerely hope you are being sarcastic.

    • @jannetteberends8730
      @jannetteberends8730 Год назад

      @@downtime86stars17 and how I am supposed to know it’s a British show?

  • @chaos-ku4vw
    @chaos-ku4vw 2 года назад +2

    They were from the region of new zealand originally and the distant ancestors of jacinda arden?
    Just a wild guess.

  • @VibesChill7991
    @VibesChill7991 Год назад

    It’s sleep not sheep 🐑! 😂

  • @Tysto
    @Tysto Год назад +3

    The 1500s wasn't medieval. The Tudor period was early Renaissance: firearms, resources from America, Protestant Reformation, flattening of the class system, etc.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад

      the title is for search engine optimization (SEO), not accuracy. fewer people would have this video recommended to them (and thus fewer would watch) if the title was more accurate. it's important to take all historical "edutainment" with a grain of salt instead of expecting it to be rigorously educational.

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      Yes, right after 1492, resources from America flooded in. Or not.

  • @MoonwalkerWorshiper
    @MoonwalkerWorshiper 6 месяцев назад

    To answer the video title: because they were cheap.

  • @nutcase1
    @nutcase1 2 года назад +1

    500y ago Henry 8 was on the throne, not Henry 7

    • @dawsie
      @dawsie Год назад +1

      As they did not give a year that I remember but talked about only the start of the Tudor period which is Henry VII not Henry VIII and if you really want to be correct Henry VII became king of England 537 years ago and Henry VIII became king 513 years ago.

    • @nutcase1
      @nutcase1 Год назад

      @@dawsie henry 8 became a king in 1509 and its been said 500y ago

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад +4

      @@nutcase1 when they say "500 years ago," they're being intentionally general. saying the exact number of years would be too wordy and distracting. yes, it's technically inaccurate, but they're not trying to write a 100% accurate history paper. they're trying to give the average viewer - a viewer who is not an expert or overly knowledgeable about this historical period - a general sense of things.
      hopefully this helps explain the reason for their word choice!

  • @jamesdolan4042
    @jamesdolan4042 Год назад

    So did Henry V111 as head of the Church of England make life better for the ordinary people by destroying all the monasteries and fiercely outlawing Catholicism, I wonder.

    • @dawsie
      @dawsie Год назад

      Not really, he destroyed the very thing that helped the poor, the then government had to then , in turn create what we know as of todays standard the Social wealth-far as we know of it as today.
      But what he did do was create the written word for the English language that we know of today, as it was either French or Latin depending on your station in life.
      What he did was also the start of the great fall of the church as we know. People started to learn that the church did not control their very lives like they had first believed

    • @LynxSouth
      @LynxSouth Год назад

      The Catholic Church controlled/siphoned off about 30% of the wealth of the country. It owned that much land, and sent the profits to Rome instead of spending or investing in England (or whichever country). That had been one of the main reasons for rebellions against the Church for centuries. It had gotten to the point that nations did not have sovereignty in their own borders, the popes & prelates being all too involved in politics. With the English Reformation, that money and decision-making power stayed at home. The money certainly wasn't all spent with an eye to creating a more equitable society, but it opened up a lot of possibilities and made room for a lot of changes, good and not so good, that couldn't have happened otherwise. In addition, monks, priests, et al. held roles later filled by clerical and middle-class workers. Whether life became ''better'' depends on your personality, beliefs, goals, and socioeconomic status. It wasn't just closing down the monasteries, it was a fundamental re-ordering of society and most things in it.

  • @CyberChud2077
    @CyberChud2077 Год назад

    Because Europe is cold.

  • @bgallasch
    @bgallasch 5 месяцев назад

    They need 6 people and one dog to carry 10 Sheeps and some lambs back home? 😅😅Not very efficient. Also after washing the sheeps seem to be much muddier then before. 🤪

  • @cerberus6654
    @cerberus6654 Год назад +7

    Watching this you realize why diseases and infections were so common back then. People went from handling shit-crusted wool with their bare hands to making bread, then into the dairy to run their fingers through the cheese, then pick up a goose, and then back into the kitchen to cook and the whole time, maybe wiping their hands with the same cloth after (maybe) washing their hands before eating in a bowl of standing water. And Ruth's long, grimy and blackened fingernails say it all. Although no medieval working woman would have had long fingernail. So much for historical accuracy there.

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      This is how the Chinese live, with chicken, pig, and human excrement being eaten and creating new flus every year. I read an article about it, the Chinese government has tried to stop it, and animals going to market alive (because the Chinese don't trust one another that meat is fresh) continue the problem because live animals share viruses.

  • @speakupriseup4549
    @speakupriseup4549 Год назад

    I give up, we're they good kissers? 💋🐑

  • @dmax64
    @dmax64 Год назад +2

    What's the difference between a Scotsman and the Rolling Stones? The Stones say hey you get off my cloud and a scotsman says hey Macloed get off of my ewe.....lol

    • @coop5329
      @coop5329 Год назад +1

      Well, sort of. Except it doesn't scan in Brit or Scot accent because ewe is pronounced yo (and used to be spelled yowe)

    • @dmax64
      @dmax64 Год назад

      @@coop5329 that's okay it was a big hit in North America.

  • @user-io6pj8bz8h
    @user-io6pj8bz8h Год назад +1

    Why the F was there a black women there?

  • @pjschmid2251
    @pjschmid2251 Год назад +2

    They couldn’t find somebody that knew how to spin to show how spinning worked? That was the worst spinning job I have seen in a long time (and that includes my feeble attempts at the drop spindle). There are plenty of hobbyists that are absolutely fabulous spinners that could’ve shown how spinning really works.

  • @BA-gn3qb
    @BA-gn3qb 2 года назад +7

    Why do Scotts wear kilts?
    Because sheep can hear zippers.
    🐑🐑😍

    • @P.e.m.a.
      @P.e.m.a. 2 года назад

      😳😳😳

  • @anitaboneshow
    @anitaboneshow Год назад +1

    Why is it acceptable to just force a living thing to do what you want it to do? They're LAUGHING that the sheep are resisting! Being THAT self-entitled isn't amusing.

  • @beverleyheadley-glover371
    @beverleyheadley-glover371 2 года назад +3

    Now I though I would see thousands upon thousands upon thousands of comments. However. I would like to know if aný historians researched immigrants coming in at that centuries from all over the world and how they were treated . Mmmmm.

    • @goatkidmom
      @goatkidmom 2 года назад

      William Shakespeare's Othello.

    • @downtime86stars17
      @downtime86stars17 Год назад +4

      Why would you think that a video which is clearly about day-to-day farm life in rural England in the 1500s would discuss medieval European immigration patterns?

    • @Shmerpy
      @Shmerpy Год назад

      May Day riots, 1517

  • @voraciousreader3341
    @voraciousreader3341 Год назад +3

    I really wish Ruth’s manner didn’t bother me so much. She and the twee historian with the huge round glasses really drive me crazy, and it’s such a drag! I’m really interested in this era!

  • @goodbanter4427
    @goodbanter4427 Год назад +1

    I'm an Orthodox Christian and I have to say, what you say at 13:33 is plain wrong. Nobody has ever worshiped saints: we venerate them. However, thanks to the Reformation and the watering down of Christian worship, I can see how saintly veneration is quickly confused with worship. Let me tell you what worship is: the offering of the Sacrifice on the altar to God the Father. *That* is worship. No mass is offered up to a saint, not even to the Mother of God, so they're not worshiped: nor have they ever been. Hope this clears this mistake up for those who are interested.

    • @AstroGremlinAmerican
      @AstroGremlinAmerican 8 месяцев назад

      I enjoy the evening before All Saints Day. It's called Halloween.

  • @mortalclown3812
    @mortalclown3812 Год назад

    If anyone loves animals, this is hard to watch.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад +4

      based on what's shown, these animals seem to be treated very well, so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

  • @johnadams5245
    @johnadams5245 2 года назад +3

    this is stolen content from bbc
    dunno why this hasnt been taken down

    • @surestar74
      @surestar74 Год назад +2

      Right?! Like many content creators show a 5 second clip and they get slammed with copy right claims... all off the videos on this channel are stolen from the BBC. Or maybe this is channel is owned by the bbc?

    • @pahanjayasooriya2513
      @pahanjayasooriya2513 Год назад +1

      The channel is part of it

    • @Tysto
      @Tysto Год назад +4

      This channel is part of the HistoryHit Network & have he rights.

    • @daniellestevens2068
      @daniellestevens2068 Год назад +1

      It's the history Channel I'm sure they paid for it.

    • @sethescope
      @sethescope Год назад

      whether content is stolen depends on whether someone has permission to use it. if they have permission to use this content, it's not stolen.
      just because content originates with one corporation doesn't mean that anyone else using it is automatically stealing it.

  • @janetmackinnon3411
    @janetmackinnon3411 Год назад

    How many unseen workers were involved in this work? Nobody seems tired.. and there would have been children working there as well. It was not possible to live then without little hands to do the weeding, the scaring off of birds...
    This series is interesting, but not at all acurate. Shame!

    • @haselnusszweig5533
      @haselnusszweig5533 Год назад +3

      This is not a movie but a doocumentary mainly focusing on three Historians/archeologists and the Tasks they are trying out. So there is really no need at all to put kids in this show. So shame yourself

    • @MrSheckstr
      @MrSheckstr Год назад +1

      There are a few episodes with children in it the harvest and Christmas feast for an example . But this is more equivalent to a 15th century version of Dirty Jobs with Mike Rowe than either a fully authentic total immersion into the lifestyle or a Hollywood quality production

    • @dawsie
      @dawsie Год назад +2

      The site of the filming is actually a full live working Tudor village in England, now by todays laws they still can not put children to work in a working Tudor village, they would be braking the laws, now if it was a movie out of Hollywood then yes there would be children used in the film. We have working colonial villages in Australia and even they don’t have children working in them.
      As it stated at the beginning of the video it states it is following the lives of three people only, Ruth, John and Peter and how their lives were affected in the Tudor times not that of the lives of children

  • @bobrickleson2087
    @bobrickleson2087 2 года назад

    Sheep buggering? No thanks

  • @grizzlybearzzz2824
    @grizzlybearzzz2824 2 года назад

    They are handsome but i bet they smell bad. But first english guys ive seen who act masculine. That woman is a hobgoblin