“The independent Investigator, my uncle, has worked thoroughly with our HR department, my mom, and have found myself clear of any wrongdoing.” -MrBeast probably.
"Did I do this?" Asked Mr. Beast. To which Mr. Beast replied "No I did not." And then Mr. Beast turned towards Mr. Beast and said, "Your honor. No further questions."
"Mr. Beast then told the Jury that it was their duty and theirs alone to go through the facts and come to a decision. In a single microsecond the Jury, consisting of Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, KSI, and Mr. Beast declared Mr. Beast innocent on all charges. The crowd cheered as Mr. Beast kissed his wife, Mr. Beast, and decided to go home to tell his child Mr. Beast the good news. This has been Mr. Beast, live from Beast news. Back to you, Mr. Beast."
mr beast LITTERALLY changed tons of their videos cutting out certain scenes where the accusations casmer from...if he was innocent he would not have activly deleted countless of videos and e3dited the evidence out of them. a innocent man wouldnt do such things.
There is no claim that the individual did not do certain things. Mainly that the company is not related to it. He can want to remove them afterwards even if his company isn't the problem.
Having a Shadman poster in your video is a bad look, innocent or guilty. Cleaning up your image isn't an admission of guilt. That being said, I don't believe Mr Beast is innocent either, but this isn't evidence.
The Law office did their job, but the key point is that they can only work with what they have. Mr. Beast can cherry-pick what ever he wants them to have and what not, and the law office gets to work based on that source material. So in a nutshell, this doesn't really mean anything, other than PR.
It doesn't mean NOTHING. If some of the people the firm interviewed come forward and tell a different story, now the law firm can say, "You said something different in the past and here's the transcript that proves it." Likewise, the law firm can't be compelled to share anything BEAST said to them, but other evidence they found is not so protected. It's fair to say that if they found only bad news, Beast wouldn't have released the report and we wouldn't be hearing about it at all. The report doesn't prove he's completely innocent (in fact, it lists a bunch of ways he contributed), but it does prove that it would be difficult to make a case against him in court.
I agree with Logan Paul but let’s be real, even tho he made a mid song and a mid drink and a mid food product, KSI never did anything that was a scam or illegal
Asmongold is completely off the mark here. At 14:25, he's missing the point: MrBeast hired these lawyers to protect his interests, not to work against him. High-profile firms like Quinn Emanuel are retained to *defend clients,* not to investigate them impartially. They’re not in court, so they aren’t bound by the same rules of evidence or testimony under oath, meaning they can frame findings in ways that cast the client in a better light, downplaying potential issues or reframing narratives to suit their agenda. These “independent” investigations often appear unbiased but are crafted to align with the client's goals, creating an illusion of transparency while keeping tight control over what’s disclosed and how it's presented to the public.
Yeah I see where you're coming from, it's from not knowing what you're talking about and if MrBeast ever saw your reaction to this he'd say "GOTTEM" or something that shows that this is the reaction he hoped because most people have no idea what they are talking about when a firm of lawyers slaps their name on something.
This is pretty false. The company doesn't benefit from deliberately making probably false claims. Their reputation is what is paid for, and being caught ruins them and their clients. If a client is caught out, it benefits the firm to expose it, since now their clean investigations are more credible. The financial incentive is there to actually call out clients that are guilty.
Only if the lawfirm is caught with undeniable evidence. Which will never happen. "We were not given x, y, or z" "that information was not disclosed by our client" etc etc. They are there to Protect the client. No one hires these companies when they are clean, they let the regular investigation happen. This is PURELY a pr firm in the guise of a law firm in this situation. Plausible deniability if caught and a boost to their True reputation of protecting clients if not caught. It's a no risk game for the law firm.
Yes and no. Yes, you hire a law firm because you want some kind of respectability but no, they're not going to throw themselves on a grenade to save you. That's why this process works in any sense. The law firm knows the law and they know what can be proven in court and what cannot. They're there to look at the evidence and give you the news... and if it was terrible news Beast would never have released the report at all; he would have just buried it. They way to read these things is backwards. The report says what Beast NEEDED to do, so it's fair to say those are all the things he DIDN'T do which contributed to the situation. He didn't send a 'clear message'... in other words, people thought that PDF files were okay. There were no businesslike officials to tell him he was contributing to the culture in that way. There was no handbooks to say this wasn't allowed. And anyone who had suspicions had no one to tell, because Beast seemed completely okay with it all. The lawyers basically acknowledged that everyone thought he knew what was going on and was on board. Since Beast can't be forced to testify against himself, there's no way in court to PROVE he knew what was going on and was on board.
Nah its a bit diffrent, Blizzard investigated itself (no outside people involved as far as i know atleast) MrBeast has hired a 3rd party investigation, the only problem there is that they can withhold certain information(MrBeast), which may make the result wrong(likely here to quite some extent) Blizzard incomparison just did so itself and can therefore say what they want, meaning atleast there isnt anything provably wrong in the investigation, doesnt mean its 100% that they are innocent/its unlikely. I bet they just withholded information.
hes scammed charitys and been semi proven for crypto rugpulls* since this. someone get a mod on this we need content. *double edit check the someordinary gamers vid for reference
How on earth did they assess 4,500,000 documents in 3 months - it's clear they didn't so who knows what they missed. that's 50,000 documents a day, not pages but documents which could have 1 page, 10 pages or 100 pages. This is clearly BS
@@ErikPThow fast do you read books ? Books have like 200 - 500 pages. Are you reading 100 books a day ? Even with employees that would take a big f ing while
Programs exist buddy a large company like this is a playground for 4.500.000 documents they use to work with The most high company in the world who have milions of documents@@sparkyanimations213
@@sparkyanimations213 To be fair, there are language models finetuned to do just that, as well as entire software products built on top of those LLMs; even some product like Casetext specifically made to help lawyers significantly increase their productivity
@@sparkyanimations213you do realize theres text to speech reading apps plus most of the time law firms pass the discovery work like this to the new hires or interns plus from what ive heard as a lawyer or someone practicing law you read so much that you naturally become a speed reader you also learn how to skim read
I worked for a hotelcompany, and a lot of us were treated like shit, 7 day weeks, 9am-10pm, they then had a firm come in and conduct a investigation into some sort of inhumane work expectations, we all got interviewed and we said everything was completely fine because last time this happened the Bar Manager suddenly stopped showing up. If a company outsources investigation employees will side with the people paying for the roof over their head like I did, I only worked there for a year and it was horrible. Companies expectations are insane nowadays, no wonder no one said anything, employees don't have infinite resources like Jimmy.
It's certainly the first thing I thought. If any of ex-employees were paid off and signed NDAs they couldn't break them and current ones are unlikely to say what they know. It's a whitewash.
It should be noted the law firm hired, while versed in many areas, is top in IP, Patent, Trademark, and Trade Secrets. Which is exactly why their finding sounds like an attempt at protecting their client and his property. This was not an attempt to investigate and provide accountability, it WAS however an attempt at protecting the value of "Mr Beast" and his company.
Cause its true Why the fk would a company hire untalented individual? Its like you trying to make an editing firm and employing someone with an arts degree
@@DemonicEmperor2023 you must understand the difference of language " a group of talented young individuals" does nothing legally UNLESS you are trying to convince a jury or the public that your client is good. But from a purely legal language point its just incoherent scribble on a paper that means nothing.
@@demonsluger Which is what theyre trying to do????? Hello? Do you think they arent trying to win over the public by posting it to social media???? lmao
@@TheLitRight That's the big part. 39 interviews sounds like a decent number until you remember that it is highly likely that someone is going to be interviewed at multiple times throughout the process, since it isn't like the interviewer will know every possible question they want to ask on the record from the very beginning. It is just as meaningless number as the "millions of emails".
These aren't criminal interviews. Interviewees have every right to refuse to be interviewed. The attorneys may have contracted 200 people and only 39 showed up. I'm just saying that it's not necessarily nefarious.
@@ShaggyRogers1 Not to mention if you're still working there and what you say will be reported back you're not going to feel comfortable spilling any beans.
Yea that second bulletpoint almost instantly proves in itself that the company purposefully did not surrender the evidence that would incriminate them to the investigating law firm. Because if Quinn Emmanuel (One of the largest law firms in America by the way) found based on their findings that the company didn't know about Delaware's history for example, and Ava Tyson's history when there's new evidence in Rosanna Pansino's video that proves without a shadow of a doubt that Jimmy knew that Ava was sexually into underage girls the entire time, then there is no way Quinn Emmanuel was given all the information available. There is no way a law firm of this size would make a provably false statement, like Asmon said. They hired a law firm to do an investigation for credibility and had to dupe the law firm that they hired themselves. This is not even a suspicion, this is just glaringly obvious and that second clause alone proves unequivocally that they withold evidence from the law firm. That one guy is right. MrBeast is guilty on some weird shit.
I don't think so, I think they were hired to find everything in case it goes to trial and bury it before discovery. Lawyers are hired to protect you, not expose you.
Read the wording of the allegation they present as having no basis. What they said was that they found that they didn't hire them BECAUSE of their criminal history, they never said anything about not being aware of said histories when they hired. Only that the hiring process did not consider those to be a factor.
@@SherrifOfNottingham They specifically phrase it as "knowingly hired", which is true. They probably didn't bother doing ANY background checks, so had no idea who they were hiring. Everyone at the company got there through nepotism connections. It isn't like they actually take applications.
Let’s be honest here, who actually believes they’re trans and not faking it to get away with a name change and to try to escape their past? Because I just don’t buy it
@@yaumingchang5360 nope. The maths checks out. They claimed to have reviewed 4.5 million documents in 90 days. Do the maths yourself. Or are you incapable?
@@chrs-wltrsok so they did a copy of all documents and a word scan. Guess what, they can omit any incriminating words they don’t want to find and then claim they reviewed them all and found nothing.
Even their public discord had shit that proves without a shadow of a doubt that Ava Tyson was attracted to minors. And they were employed the whole time, while Jimmy "only now found out", which is unequivocally proven to be untrue and a blatant lie on Rosanna Pansino's new video starring DogPack404
The wording is important. They specifically say guilty of the act of, that doesn't say anything about someone's attractions. Legalise bs but still technically true.
funny how it states no wrong doing was found, and then right after states ; mandatory company training, new policies, new ways to report, and hiring new HR.... but i thought no wrong doing was found.
The 3rd paragraph down says that there was some harassment and other things that were identified. It tries to downplay it and it really could be the crux of all the allegations just relegated to "well, MrBeast didn't do anything wrong but some of his employees were rowdy."
And that now there can be anonymous internal complaints. Which I take to mean those interviews were done on the basis the staff still working there knew anything they said would get back to Jimmy so they kept quiet.
8:38 they didn't have to scrub anything. The kids Chris (Ava) was being a creep with were probably 16 or 17, and then Mr Beast paid their parents to shut them up to protect his activist friend. It's pretty obvious.
The part that gets me is the "Allegations were uniformly rejected" being their closer, as if the interviews were the only part of the investigation that mattered. So it feels like what they're saying isn't: "We investigated and found no problems" What it seems like they're really saying is: "None of the people we interviewed confirmed the allegations" "Allegations were rejected" does not in any way shape or form mean the same thing as "Our Investigation discovered no misconduct". This really feels like the kind of half-truth or lie by omission that legal teams absolutely love to use.
they didnt lie, they were obviously withold information by the company. theres so many different ways to unequivocally prove that the company ABSOLUTELY KNEW about chris and delaware both ahead of time.
@@yihadistxdl951 Why do they need the company to provide them this information when it's already publicly available and the entire internet knows it? They're obviously ignoring it intentionally and looking at very selective evidence to make this statement. So probably still lying but just not provably lying. They'll pretend their "investigator" didn't do a simple Google search to see what the allegations and evidence actually are.
Mr. Beast: replies to a 3 month old post to hide an update from being viewed by more people. Asmongold: finds out about it, talks about it on stream and makes a RUclips video essentially signal boosting that which was meant to be hidden
And Asmongold recieves views and ad revenue, that's his entire business model, profiting from someone else's drama. I'm not saying that it's bad, he's still a good watch in my humble opinion.
We won't know if anything happened unless an actual investigation happens. This is the same crap Blizzard did a few years ago when they were accused of SA.
@@thepsychomagus but that was an actual investigation, did you not listen to what asmon said or what. Learn about the company that did this please and think twice why would they risk anything to cover up for a much smaller client than what is the norm for them.....
@@thepsychomagus The thing is that Blizzard was accused by the government, and then did the shakeup of management. This is them saying that "nothing is wrong here" and at the very same time saying that everyone is going to be kicked from the C-level positions. Replacing the entire C-suite isn't something an innocent company does.
Might just be me but it sounds like while they replaced the CEO, CPO and CLO but they didn't have a CFO before? 'soon to be hired' instead of 'new' like the other 3
Ehh that is par for the course whenever any company gets into hot water. They replace higher ups so they have something to point to and say "we eliminated the ones who are responsible" even if those people had no involvement. Top level guys like that are ultimately responsible for allowing any bad behavior to happen, they are supposed to be aware of everything that happens within the company. Which is technically impossible unless the company is extremely small and these people are in contact with regular staff all the time.
@@youtubasoarus really? In internet allegations is everywhere, police just can't investigate everyone, so they don't initiate investigation, if they think that it is useless.
I don't mind a child abuser getting work after their prison sentence has been completed, but to get hired for a media company that mostly advertises to children, that's where the suspicions get raised. Why expose children to this offender in any way at all? Give him some other job that doesn't put him in front of the camera and parents' suspicions.
He wouldn't find anything that would help his case and he would still be basically vaporized in the courts. If James Warren sued Dogpack it would be a NIGHTMARE for Dogpack.
@@jermseventy8341 Discovery here wouldn’t be about helping his case LMAO…. It’s about what Mr Beast would have to legally turn over, involuntarily… The documents Mr Beast gave the law firm in this video was voluntarily. So, do you get it now?
@@emilymschoener9193 Okay and? It's not going to help out Dogpack. Dogpack's core allegations were fired in the dark by employee rumors that we know are unreliable/jokes. Do you get it now? Dogpack is a loser who screwed the story.
@@r3dr4te963 Also cause 99% of dogpack statement is "allegation". Not proven facts. For example the James Warren situation, dogpack freaking accused him of DV in front of more than 2 million people. When proven wrong(he admitted in his twitter too) no video was done to take back his statement which would at least control the damage done to the guy reputation. The most he did was a fcking twitter post which is not even 10 percent of the people that saw it on youtube.
Humanity needs to come together and stop with this "influencer" BS. Stop worshiping these people. Stop treating them like gods. Because more often than not, they are NOT better or smarter than you or me. In fact, they are more often than not pure evil, greedy, and not very fit in the head.
You are proposing just straight up rewriting the nature of humans; unless you pull a Miquella somehow, no one is gonna go "Huh, you know, I am in the wrong, and will be reasonable and better as an individual from now on."
Im 40 i never liked none of this BS and they dare to call me.old fashion a boomer and negative in general ... geuss who is gonne get a smack in the face from reality itself at a certain point
Jake was already gunning for Jimmy, so either he or Delaware lied. Also really weird that his mum would be there, she’s not involved with the channel at all.
@Evanz111 you obviously dont know enough about the situation to have an opinion about it. Jimmys mom being hr lead is common knowledge. So stop trying to defend mr beast.
Jake the Viking isn't a reliable source of information. Let's be realistic. Why would Jimmy care about Delaware enough to pay money to overthrow his conviction? It doesn't make sense because it didn't happen and Jake the Viking is lying.
Theyre definitely biased. They knowingly hired someone who was convicted of a felony, they knew this person, PERSONALLY. This wasn't some "climbing in your windows, snatching your people up" guy off the street, if they didn't know him, he wouldn't have been hired and they knew to keep him away and cover his face. THEY KNEW.
"In a patent infringement lawsuit between Columbia University and NortonLifeLock Inc., Quinn Emanuel, representing Norton, was sanctioned for disobeying a judge's order. The court found the firm's conduct "egregious," leading to increased damages against Norton. " - Mr. Beast's Litigation law-firm of choice.
When I search that case I dont see quinn emanuel as the one who represents norton, where do you see this and where did you find that quote if it is one.
Jimmy knew 100% that Chris was attracted to minors and theres new evidence of this that has been confirmed true. Rosanna Pansino's new video. And Chris Tyson was employed at the company the entire time. Yet the law firm statement said they found that they didn't knowingly employ people with problematic stuff. The law firm were withold information here. Guaranteed.
I like how they add "AND MINORS" in the first bullet point, failing to address the fact that CP was shared between company employees, including MrBeast himself, as shown by several other leaked chats.
I have a question... Have you considered inviting DogPack for an interview on stream? As far as I know, he accepts when asked, whether it's a big streamer like Ludwig, or a small streamer with a few thousand subs on RUclips. He is still not monetising any of this content, only agreeing to clarify and answer questions to further spread awareness (something that RUclips appears to be working against). I am asking because I watched this video on your stream for the first time, and I saw how much information you and your viewers are not updated on. For example, the video from Mission Flight that you watched yesterday is not the first allegation (and not a completely convincing one either) about Mr. Beast faking charities. DogPack has shown concrete evidence of video editing, like digitally removing buildings, that his editor's behind-the-scenes footage shows already existing before the Mr. Beast crew arrived. For example. My point is.. DogPack could come summarize all for you and your audience, and you can make your judgement after, but with all the information needed to do so. Or simply ask him to clarify too.
At this point Dogpack may aswell be controlled opposition! The last couple of blunders due to lack of research have been big distractions from all his legitimate criticisms.
@@chemicalroryHe is a human being prone to make mistakes, and I would say some of the recent blunders aren't actually blunders and you guys don't understand that reporting a crime you believe is being committed is what the FBI wants, additionally I watched the clip and Kris believed that picture to be 13 Ivanka Trump, which is still a problem because Kris believed she was 13.
I feel like the reason Mr Beast hasn't taken legal action against DogPack is because he knows legally binding subpoenas and REAL external investigation would absolutely fuck his whole enterprise.
@@SwampyThingyif you made 10000 videos you would have to force smile :/ like ppl get brain.. after a while things make less fun but you keep up good face despite it.
@@TheRealCartman2 reality is your view, my view don't mean shit to other ppl. Unless his viewers/subscribers drop significantly, nothing is gonna change.
defense lawyers are expected to do everything possible to defend their client, and claiming your client is not guilty while you know he is guilty isn't a crime, the entirety of lying in a court room is a gray area that essentially comes down to "don't get caught red handed"
How many people did this investigation? 4,500,000, thats 50,000 documents per day. Assuming 8 hour days, thats 6250 documents per hour. That's 104.16 documents per minute. That's 1.74 Documents per second. If 3 people did this, then thats 0.58 documents per second. This excludes time given to interviewers, etc. not only that, but they had to spend time finding each document, piecing together each document, finding out the relevance of each document and more. How can you read a document in less than a minute and ascertain any important data or relevance of the messages, who it is to, etc. with proper judgement. How big is the team that did this research? They have 1638 Employees. Assuming 100% of their workforce worked on this, that's 3.81 documents each per hour. 1 document every 15 minutes. They have 1000 Attorneys, and 638 "other" Employees. Let's just say the other are admin/interns looking, that's still 9.8 documents each per hour. Assuming pay for each proper admin is $30/hour, that's $459,000 in admin fees for documents alone. All 638 of these employees would also need to communicate which documents are relevant to eachother, etc.
I worked for a government contractor that somehow hired a felon (my company was strictly against hiring felons as I worked for the prison systems). It’s maybe possible they hired a SO unintentionally but that is a massive HR failure and Mr. Beast should be held responsible for how his company operates.
The way that they're completely denying the "allegations" is a huge red flag. After everything that was exposed, and proven, they still still try to bullshit their way through. The lies and deceit continues...
@@MCnightchannelthere are articles from various sources such as the NY times etc claiming this. But its all allegations and the sources arent super credible lol
"Delawares" brother "Jake the Viking" said it in his video after the drama. He said his brother had a talk about his past with Jimmy and Jimmys mother before getting hired i believe.
Every collab he does is filled with comments from AI bots, his entire audience is children... he thinks he can clear himself from an employee and friend being predatory to his audience?
That lawfirm is incredibly dodgy. Regarding grooming: "the allegations were rejected by the alleged victim" Ah yes, and the wife with two black eyes, broken bones and blood coming from her nose is screaming at the police "MY HUSBAND DID NOTHING WRONG, LEAVE HIM ALONE" as they arrest him for domestic violence. The law firm knows this, they know victims will protect the assaulter, that's one reason why this law firm is doing this FOR mr beast, not for the truth. Secondly regarding employing people with criminal history, again they say it's rejected... The brother literally said he informed them of his criminal history. So this is obviously a lie. And finally they went though 4.5 million documents, that brought up an immediate red flag. This number OBVIOUSLY includes irrelevant files, that means they went through a few hard drives and take into account a fresh install of windows has about 300k files, that means they processed and reviewed 300k files that are not at all relevant, but counted it, a few hard drives and you're already getting to that 4.5 million number. The files that were important were less than 50, that's all they needed to look at was 50 files, but saying that wouldn't have been impressive, so they need to include every file in the statement to make it sound like it was a HUGE investigation.
That's sorta sad that I'm only the second to upvote your comment after two days. People who put a bit of effort into thinking about things in the YT comment section are often punished.
Millions of documents ? Let's say it's only 2 million documents, since that's the lowest amount you could have in "millionS" - if you look at each document for 1 second, that will take 555 hours. I highly doubt that there has been millions of documents.
Let’s just pour one out for the investigators who had to sort through 2.5 million documents when about 90% of them were childish memes being sent to each other and talking about anime. No matter how much they got paid: it wasn’t enough.
HR being glorified with the title Chief People Officer is TERRIFYING. Of course a department as trash as HR would elevate themselves like that. HR is on tier with reception work, how in the hell did we get to this point?
7:25 People have to realize, there is no amount of money MrBeast can pay this company to lie for them that would make up for career-ending damage that would be done if it came out they covered up facts/truth.
They're not lying. They just are telling the good parts of the truth. Your brain only seems to work 50%. How do you think their law business would fare if they regularly expose their clients?
Fun fact. Anyone has a price, the price could be money or a picture of their family. Another fun fact. You are extremely naive to believe integrity still exists.
@@humanchannel9421a law firm is paid for their reputation. If they get caught hiding for their clients in this kind of investigation, they lose reputation and lose all the money. They make WAY more money than Mr Beast, so they don't need him. A law firm that does expose clients in investigations has much more credibility when they investigate and find nothing, making their value higher, not lower.
Mr Beast claims that the company is unbiased, but given that he is still the one that pays them for the investigation, it would be naive to assume there is not a vested interest for them to return charitable results for the Mr Beast company, as that makes it more likely they will have another business relationship in the future. Now, I'm also pretty sure that they wouldn't straight up lie in their results, because they have a reputation to uphold, but let's not forget that you don't need to *lie* in order to lie. Language can be played like an instrument
So based on this Chris can sue Mr.Beast for firing him for no reason. They say no 'grooming' took place yet is that not why Chris was fired? Now he can use this statement to sue for wrongful termination.
I believe MB's mother was both CFO and Human Resources (CPO) until very recently. This wasn't an investigation. It was a "you're my lawyers, spin this to protect me and my company".
“Mrbeast is an Innocent Charitable Man” -Mrbeast
Based
LOL😂😂😂
lmao best comment
🥹Thank goodness! My day feels a little brighter knowing MrBeast confirmed his own purity.
Good enough for me :)
“The independent Investigator, my uncle, has worked thoroughly with our HR department, my mom, and have found myself clear of any wrongdoing.”
-MrBeast probably.
His mom was literally head of HR lol
@@DanielBlak How could her little bubu do anything wrong. That's fake news mama... :)
"Did I do this?" Asked Mr. Beast. To which Mr. Beast replied "No I did not." And then Mr. Beast turned towards Mr. Beast and said, "Your honor. No further questions."
@sirteabag8652 I need time to look into this to get the reference.... it's my first day?
"Mr. Beast then told the Jury that it was their duty and theirs alone to go through the facts and come to a decision. In a single microsecond the Jury, consisting of Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, KSI, and Mr. Beast declared Mr. Beast innocent on all charges. The crowd cheered as Mr. Beast kissed his wife, Mr. Beast, and decided to go home to tell his child Mr. Beast the good news. This has been Mr. Beast, live from Beast news. Back to you, Mr. Beast."
"Case Dismissed" - Chief Deputy Judge Jimmy Donaldson (Mr Beast)
@@Uppearance what are you talking about?
I am lost in this timeline :/...Is it a plot twist were he is from the future and get's to have babies with his own self but being a women ?
mr beast LITTERALLY changed tons of their videos cutting out certain scenes where the accusations casmer from...if he was innocent he would not have activly deleted countless of videos and e3dited the evidence out of them.
a innocent man wouldnt do such things.
If innocent man wouldn't do such things, another people would exploit this, with false accusations, just because it's will hype.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
There is no claim that the individual did not do certain things. Mainly that the company is not related to it. He can want to remove them afterwards even if his company isn't the problem.
I disagree. People would do that even if innocent. Because they know how it could „look“.
Having a Shadman poster in your video is a bad look, innocent or guilty. Cleaning up your image isn't an admission of guilt.
That being said, I don't believe Mr Beast is innocent either, but this isn't evidence.
Are you sure?? Because Mr. beast did that and for what Mr beast tells me, Mr beast is innocent.
MrBeast: The first person who can clear my name gets $1 million.
MrBeast: "I voulenter as tribute"
Anything to save a buck 😞
He paid a company to lie for him.
Except he isn't gonna pay the 1 million
"I voulenter"
@@aBadWizard I was hoping no one noticed 😂😂
The Law office did their job, but the key point is that they can only work with what they have. Mr. Beast can cherry-pick what ever he wants them to have and what not, and the law office gets to work based on that source material. So in a nutshell, this doesn't really mean anything, other than PR.
In theory, so can those making accusations. Do they have actual evidence or not?
They're paid by Mr Beast LLC...
It doesn't mean NOTHING. If some of the people the firm interviewed come forward and tell a different story, now the law firm can say, "You said something different in the past and here's the transcript that proves it." Likewise, the law firm can't be compelled to share anything BEAST said to them, but other evidence they found is not so protected. It's fair to say that if they found only bad news, Beast wouldn't have released the report and we wouldn't be hearing about it at all.
The report doesn't prove he's completely innocent (in fact, it lists a bunch of ways he contributed), but it does prove that it would be difficult to make a case against him in court.
Nothing screams innocent like collabing with KSI and Logan Paul!
That's business you can't expect things to be innocent if it's just business with their products 😂
@@alphaghoul7882uhhhh, what?😂 That's not... Nvm
@@alphaghoul7882Do you know how many scams Logan Paul and KSI did?
@@TimothyGodI mean the dude that made the main comment is basing innocence on doing a business collab 💀
I agree with Logan Paul but let’s be real, even tho he made a mid song and a mid drink and a mid food product, KSI never did anything that was a scam or illegal
Asmongold is completely off the mark here. At 14:25, he's missing the point: MrBeast hired these lawyers to protect his interests, not to work against him. High-profile firms like Quinn Emanuel are retained to *defend clients,* not to investigate them impartially. They’re not in court, so they aren’t bound by the same rules of evidence or testimony under oath, meaning they can frame findings in ways that cast the client in a better light, downplaying potential issues or reframing narratives to suit their agenda. These “independent” investigations often appear unbiased but are crafted to align with the client's goals, creating an illusion of transparency while keeping tight control over what’s disclosed and how it's presented to the public.
Yeah I see where you're coming from, it's from not knowing what you're talking about and if MrBeast ever saw your reaction to this he'd say "GOTTEM" or something that shows that this is the reaction he hoped because most people have no idea what they are talking about when a firm of lawyers slaps their name on something.
This is pretty false.
The company doesn't benefit from deliberately making probably false claims.
Their reputation is what is paid for, and being caught ruins them and their clients.
If a client is caught out, it benefits the firm to expose it, since now their clean investigations are more credible.
The financial incentive is there to actually call out clients that are guilty.
Only if the lawfirm is caught with undeniable evidence. Which will never happen. "We were not given x, y, or z" "that information was not disclosed by our client" etc etc. They are there to Protect the client. No one hires these companies when they are clean, they let the regular investigation happen. This is PURELY a pr firm in the guise of a law firm in this situation. Plausible deniability if caught and a boost to their True reputation of protecting clients if not caught. It's a no risk game for the law firm.
Yes and no. Yes, you hire a law firm because you want some kind of respectability but no, they're not going to throw themselves on a grenade to save you. That's why this process works in any sense. The law firm knows the law and they know what can be proven in court and what cannot. They're there to look at the evidence and give you the news... and if it was terrible news Beast would never have released the report at all; he would have just buried it.
They way to read these things is backwards. The report says what Beast NEEDED to do, so it's fair to say those are all the things he DIDN'T do which contributed to the situation. He didn't send a 'clear message'... in other words, people thought that PDF files were okay. There were no businesslike officials to tell him he was contributing to the culture in that way. There was no handbooks to say this wasn't allowed. And anyone who had suspicions had no one to tell, because Beast seemed completely okay with it all.
The lawyers basically acknowledged that everyone thought he knew what was going on and was on board. Since Beast can't be forced to testify against himself, there's no way in court to PROVE he knew what was going on and was on board.
yep, just like the yearly independent auditor in a company. It's all bussiness as usual
He pulled out a Blizzard move with this one.
Blizzard is unstoppable now Microsoft bought it
Mr. 666 is operating on a higher level
@@BigPeeve2 for real
Nah its a bit diffrent, Blizzard investigated itself (no outside people involved as far as i know atleast) MrBeast has hired a 3rd party investigation, the only problem there is that they can withhold certain information(MrBeast), which may make the result wrong(likely here to quite some extent) Blizzard incomparison just did so itself and can therefore say what they want, meaning atleast there isnt anything provably wrong in the investigation, doesnt mean its 100% that they are innocent/its unlikely. I bet they just withholded information.
hes scammed charitys and been semi proven for crypto rugpulls* since this. someone get a mod on this we need content. *double edit check the someordinary gamers vid for reference
How on earth did they assess 4,500,000 documents in 3 months - it's clear they didn't so who knows what they missed. that's 50,000 documents a day, not pages but documents which could have 1 page, 10 pages or 100 pages. This is clearly BS
maybe they are docs and or texts
@@ErikPThow fast do you read books ?
Books have like 200 - 500 pages.
Are you reading 100 books a day ?
Even with employees that would take a big f ing while
Programs exist buddy a large company like this is a playground for 4.500.000 documents they use to work with The most high company in the world who have milions of documents@@sparkyanimations213
@@sparkyanimations213 To be fair, there are language models finetuned to do just that, as well as entire software products built on top of those LLMs; even some product like Casetext specifically made to help lawyers significantly increase their productivity
@@sparkyanimations213you do realize theres text to speech reading apps plus most of the time law firms pass the discovery work like this to the new hires or interns plus from what ive heard as a lawyer or someone practicing law you read so much that you naturally become a speed reader you also learn how to skim read
Crazy how homie turned into an actual villain once things started to leak out
went mask off lmao
Truly what a 360
And Nikocado becoming beloved and wholesome?! Truly unreal times.
@@Marcheziora eeeeeh.. lets not get ahead of ourselves 😅
He's always been a scumbag behind the scenes. Now it's just apparent to everyone
I worked for a hotelcompany, and a lot of us were treated like shit, 7 day weeks, 9am-10pm, they then had a firm come in and conduct a investigation into some sort of inhumane work expectations, we all got interviewed and we said everything was completely fine because last time this happened the Bar Manager suddenly stopped showing up. If a company outsources investigation employees will side with the people paying for the roof over their head like I did, I only worked there for a year and it was horrible. Companies expectations are insane nowadays, no wonder no one said anything, employees don't have infinite resources like Jimmy.
It's certainly the first thing I thought. If any of ex-employees were paid off and signed NDAs they couldn't break them and current ones are unlikely to say what they know. It's a whitewash.
xqc's brother??? 🤔
Coward
People like you are responsible for working conditions across most jobs being horrible
@@Jordabrz No I'm not, I'm responsible for putting food on the table, chicken and cows don't fall from the sky brother.
Opinion, he investigated himself and deleted the evidence thats incriminating
The company that "investigated" him are the same lawyers that send C&D to dog
This shoukd be top comment. This investigation was absolutely about plugging leaks and cleaning up anything that the public doesn’t know yet.
It should be noted the law firm hired, while versed in many areas, is top in IP, Patent, Trademark, and Trade Secrets. Which is exactly why their finding sounds like an attempt at protecting their client and his property. This was not an attempt to investigate and provide accountability, it WAS however an attempt at protecting the value of "Mr Beast" and his company.
They hired a company to find and bury everything bad before it goes to court.
Can't be guilty if there isn't no evidence!
" a group of talented young individuals" why would a law firm write this LOL seems like mr beast petting his own back
They were paid to.
Fr, random glazing??? Suspicious...😂
Cause its true
Why the fk would a company hire untalented individual?
Its like you trying to make an editing firm and employing someone with an arts degree
@@DemonicEmperor2023 you must understand the difference of language " a group of talented young individuals" does nothing legally UNLESS you are trying to convince a jury or the public that your client is good. But from a purely legal language point its just incoherent scribble on a paper that means nothing.
@@demonsluger Which is what theyre trying to do????? Hello? Do you think they arent trying to win over the public by posting it to social media???? lmao
"Conducted 39 Interviews"... wow so brave and amazing.
39 interviews, not 39 interviewees. Could have been they interviewed Mr Beast 38 times and Ava once.
@@TheLitRight That's the big part. 39 interviews sounds like a decent number until you remember that it is highly likely that someone is going to be interviewed at multiple times throughout the process, since it isn't like the interviewer will know every possible question they want to ask on the record from the very beginning. It is just as meaningless number as the "millions of emails".
These aren't criminal interviews. Interviewees have every right to refuse to be interviewed. The attorneys may have contracted 200 people and only 39 showed up. I'm just saying that it's not necessarily nefarious.
“China!” “Wow what a great video!”
@@ShaggyRogers1 Not to mention if you're still working there and what you say will be reported back you're not going to feel comfortable spilling any beans.
The title:mr beast investigate himself
Asmongold:no mr beast didn't investigate himself
Yea that second bulletpoint almost instantly proves in itself that the company purposefully did not surrender the evidence that would incriminate them to the investigating law firm. Because if Quinn Emmanuel (One of the largest law firms in America by the way) found based on their findings that the company didn't know about Delaware's history for example, and Ava Tyson's history when there's new evidence in Rosanna Pansino's video that proves without a shadow of a doubt that Jimmy knew that Ava was sexually into underage girls the entire time, then there is no way Quinn Emmanuel was given all the information available. There is no way a law firm of this size would make a provably false statement, like Asmon said.
They hired a law firm to do an investigation for credibility and had to dupe the law firm that they hired themselves. This is not even a suspicion, this is just glaringly obvious and that second clause alone proves unequivocally that they withold evidence from the law firm.
That one guy is right. MrBeast is guilty on some weird shit.
I don't think so, I think they were hired to find everything in case it goes to trial and bury it before discovery. Lawyers are hired to protect you, not expose you.
Read the wording of the allegation they present as having no basis.
What they said was that they found that they didn't hire them BECAUSE of their criminal history, they never said anything about not being aware of said histories when they hired. Only that the hiring process did not consider those to be a factor.
@@SherrifOfNottingham They specifically phrase it as "knowingly hired", which is true. They probably didn't bother doing ANY background checks, so had no idea who they were hiring. Everyone at the company got there through nepotism connections. It isn't like they actually take applications.
Let’s be honest here, who actually believes they’re trans and not faking it to get away with a name change and to try to escape their past? Because I just don’t buy it
@@3adgamd3r wow brain big, much smarts
If you do the math, if they worked 24/7 for 90 days they reviewed 35 documents/evidence per minute... Something is wrong with this.
Homie never heard of Ctrl + F
bro fail school
@@yaumingchang5360 nope. The maths checks out. They claimed to have reviewed 4.5 million documents in 90 days. Do the maths yourself. Or are you incapable?
@@chrs-wltrsok so they did a copy of all documents and a word scan. Guess what, they can omit any incriminating words they don’t want to find and then claim they reviewed them all and found nothing.
I mean it depends on how many people worked on the case I guess, 1 guy certainly cant do that.
I bet their secret discord wasnt apart of the investigation. Just exclude what you dont want them investigating and call it a job done
Even their public discord had shit that proves without a shadow of a doubt that Ava Tyson was attracted to minors. And they were employed the whole time, while Jimmy "only now found out", which is unequivocally proven to be untrue and a blatant lie on Rosanna Pansino's new video starring DogPack404
@@yihadistxdl951 why you calling it ava lol
@@MrSatoshi-xn2dngotta protect the feelings of predators
The wording is important. They specifically say guilty of the act of, that doesn't say anything about someone's attractions. Legalise bs but still technically true.
@@yihadistxdl951 Rosanna's new video is trash idk why they just keep uploading stuff instead of doing actual investigations
This reminds me of when Dream "hired" an expert to prove that he didn't cheat his Minecraft speedrun.
funny how it states no wrong doing was found, and then right after states ; mandatory company training, new policies, new ways to report, and hiring new HR.... but i thought no wrong doing was found.
The 3rd paragraph down says that there was some harassment and other things that were identified. It tries to downplay it and it really could be the crux of all the allegations just relegated to "well, MrBeast didn't do anything wrong but some of his employees were rowdy."
And that now there can be anonymous internal complaints. Which I take to mean those interviews were done on the basis the staff still working there knew anything they said would get back to Jimmy so they kept quiet.
yes that would be to prevent shitshows like this in the future...
Especially if you're hiring new HR....yeah, something went massively wrong lmao.
"mandatory company training, new policies, new ways to report, and hiring new HR" that's to avoid leaks
When he tweeted "all this transphobia is starting to piss me off"
I was like; oh scary, oh shiver me timbers.
Nah he is just setting up the 1$ vs 1.000.000$ lawyers video
underrated comment
The decimal points make your comment $1 vs $1
@@justina7794 Europeans/Asians use decimals in place of commas, and use commas in place of decimals.
@@justina7794some other countries use periods instead of commas
@@justina7794not too bright huh?
8:38 they didn't have to scrub anything. The kids Chris (Ava) was being a creep with were probably 16 or 17, and then Mr Beast paid their parents to shut them up to protect his activist friend. It's pretty obvious.
The part that gets me is the "Allegations were uniformly rejected" being their closer, as if the interviews were the only part of the investigation that mattered.
So it feels like what they're saying isn't: "We investigated and found no problems"
What it seems like they're really saying is: "None of the people we interviewed confirmed the allegations"
"Allegations were rejected" does not in any way shape or form mean the same thing as "Our Investigation discovered no misconduct". This really feels like the kind of half-truth or lie by omission that legal teams absolutely love to use.
they didnt lie, they were obviously withold information by the company. theres so many different ways to unequivocally prove that the company ABSOLUTELY KNEW about chris and delaware both ahead of time.
"After throwing enough money at the people interviewed, they rejected all allegation of misconduct."
@@yihadistxdl951 Why do they need the company to provide them this information when it's already publicly available and the entire internet knows it? They're obviously ignoring it intentionally and looking at very selective evidence to make this statement. So probably still lying but just not provably lying. They'll pretend their "investigator" didn't do a simple Google search to see what the allegations and evidence actually are.
That's legalese. It it stating that the investigation rejects them. Not that those interviewed reject them.
The lesson here is.. bananas are a great source of potassium.👍
Mr. Beast: replies to a 3 month old post to hide an update from being viewed by more people.
Asmongold: finds out about it, talks about it on stream and makes a RUclips video essentially signal boosting that which was meant to be hidden
And Asmongold recieves views and ad revenue, that's his entire business model, profiting from someone else's drama.
I'm not saying that it's bad, he's still a good watch in my humble opinion.
@@Kelanich i mean if he is gonna try and hide evidence maybe someone else deserves the money
Thanks for the play by play…
Why i love this guy despite not sharing all of his opinions he is against BS and so am i
@@Kelanichbullshit needs to be called out we need people like asmon
It's less "I have investigated myself, and I'm fine guys," and more "Yes, you may search my room... But stay out of my closet."
If there was nothing done wrong. Why do they need a new CEO, CPO, CFO and General Counsel (CLO).
We won't know if anything happened unless an actual investigation happens. This is the same crap Blizzard did a few years ago when they were accused of SA.
@@thepsychomagus but that was an actual investigation, did you not listen to what asmon said or what. Learn about the company that did this please and think twice why would they risk anything to cover up for a much smaller client than what is the norm for them.....
@@thepsychomagus The thing is that Blizzard was accused by the government, and then did the shakeup of management. This is them saying that "nothing is wrong here" and at the very same time saying that everyone is going to be kicked from the C-level positions. Replacing the entire C-suite isn't something an innocent company does.
Might just be me but it sounds like while they replaced the CEO, CPO and CLO but they didn't have a CFO before? 'soon to be hired' instead of 'new' like the other 3
Ehh that is par for the course whenever any company gets into hot water. They replace higher ups so they have something to point to and say "we eliminated the ones who are responsible" even if those people had no involvement. Top level guys like that are ultimately responsible for allowing any bad behavior to happen, they are supposed to be aware of everything that happens within the company. Which is technically impossible unless the company is extremely small and these people are in contact with regular staff all the time.
How the hell, if there are allegations of cp and pedophelia, are the police not directly involved in an investigation?!
One word: Money.
Money rules all can make or fix problems
Almost all this allegations is bs, and because of this, there has no reason to investigate.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@badluckdice4447 That's not how police work. If there's an allegation of criminality, they are obligated to investigate.
@@youtubasoarus really?
In internet allegations is everywhere, police just can't investigate everyone, so they don't initiate investigation, if they think that it is useless.
They reviewed "millions" of documents. If the documents had one word per page, that'd still be impossible.
Pretty sure documents can entail text messages and group chats, like even really short correspondence
@@Evanz111 he said even if it had 1 word, they still wouldn't be able to get thru them all.
6+ year long business no matter the type would have millions of documents lol. Don't be dumb.
3 months and millions of documents is legitimate child's play for law offices like these, especially when a company is as large as this.
@@nAcolz did you miss the part where the firm themselves said in the paper, 3.5 million documents?
I don't mind a child abuser getting work after their prison sentence has been completed, but to get hired for a media company that mostly advertises to children, that's where the suspicions get raised. Why expose children to this offender in any way at all? Give him some other job that doesn't put him in front of the camera and parents' suspicions.
Any man that looks dead in the eyes and sees into my soul through a screen like that cannot be up to any good
Yea the dead eyes tell everything you need to know, he's missing something that normal humans feel in terms of emotion.
Holllly his eyes do look dead lmao… glad you pointed that out
He became famous from saying logan pauls name like a million times. He is incredibly austistic and probably lacks normal emotion
he looks AI generated, something is off about the guy. maybe it is his eyes.
For real, he has no life in those eyes
Man, I don’t want DogPack to have the stress but an actual discovery process here would be insane.
He wouldn't find anything that would help his case and he would still be basically vaporized in the courts. If James Warren sued Dogpack it would be a NIGHTMARE for Dogpack.
@@jermseventy8341 Discovery here wouldn’t be about helping his case LMAO…. It’s about what Mr Beast would have to legally turn over, involuntarily… The documents Mr Beast gave the law firm in this video was voluntarily. So, do you get it now?
@@emilymschoener9193 Okay and? It's not going to help out Dogpack. Dogpack's core allegations were fired in the dark by employee rumors that we know are unreliable/jokes. Do you get it now? Dogpack is a loser who screwed the story.
@@jermseventy83411$ lawyer
Jimmy is speaking like a true politician.
So he lies to us every time
@@nicknevco215don’t forget half truths, which can cause more harm than a simple lie
yea, he is not jimmy anymore, he is mrbeast brand
Don't give him any ideas dude!
This is the difference between MoistCritikal and Asmon. Charlie goes blind whenever there is something which involves MrBeast
hes a big fanboy
more like LeaistCritikal
Tbf, Charlie usually avoid confronting drama involving big youtubers. More so now after he get fooled by Sneako. Not really defending him
@@r3dr4te963 Also cause 99% of dogpack statement is "allegation". Not proven facts. For example the James Warren situation, dogpack freaking accused him of DV in front of more than 2 million people. When proven wrong(he admitted in his twitter too) no video was done to take back his statement which would at least control the damage done to the guy reputation. The most he did was a fcking twitter post which is not even 10 percent of the people that saw it on youtube.
@@r3dr4te963 He did make a video about Doctor Disrespect's situation immediately tho...
i’ve never seen MrBeast genuine smile in any pic/video, the eyes don’t lie
He just cant smile, not even in his videos. All he does is lift the corners of his mouth and grin
I remember an old video where Mr. Beast was playing Generation 5 Pokemon Showdown. Mr. Beast Poketuber timeline 😂.
I was done with this guy the moment i first heard about him like 6 years ago
Dead like a robot
Psychopath's smile that no emotion in a smile 😂
$1 dollar vs $1000000 dollar investigation
The "Knowingly employing" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that paragraph.
I mean, that's the basis of concern. Were they aware or not. Can't really judge someone for not being aware of something.
"Your honor. He investigated himself and found no wrongdoing"
Humanity needs to come together and stop with this "influencer" BS. Stop worshiping these people. Stop treating them like gods. Because more often than not, they are NOT better or smarter than you or me. In fact, they are more often than not pure evil, greedy, and not very fit in the head.
You are proposing just straight up rewriting the nature of humans; unless you pull a Miquella somehow, no one is gonna go "Huh, you know, I am in the wrong, and will be reasonable and better as an individual from now on."
I mean it's the same with sports it just newer generations have moved over to influencers now
Mr.beast still better than you.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Im 40 i never liked none of this BS and they dare to call me.old fashion a boomer and negative in general ... geuss who is gonne get a smack in the face from reality itself at a certain point
@@badluckdice4447 Nope. Not even remotely. I work in construction safety, therefor I am infinitely better than Mr Beast. Notsorry.
Hiring your own investigation team is the same as liking your own tweets.
I thought Jake the Viking said Delaware spoke to Jimmy and his mom about his situation when he was hired.
Jake was already gunning for Jimmy, so either he or Delaware lied. Also really weird that his mum would be there, she’s not involved with the channel at all.
They said she is HR manager for mrbeast
@@Evanz111No, his mom is involved as the hiring manager and works for the human resources department😂
@Evanz111 you obviously dont know enough about the situation to have an opinion about it. Jimmys mom being hr lead is common knowledge. So stop trying to defend mr beast.
Jake the Viking isn't a reliable source of information. Let's be realistic. Why would Jimmy care about Delaware enough to pay money to overthrow his conviction? It doesn't make sense because it didn't happen and Jake the Viking is lying.
Theyre definitely biased. They knowingly hired someone who was convicted of a felony, they knew this person, PERSONALLY. This wasn't some "climbing in your windows, snatching your people up" guy off the street, if they didn't know him, he wouldn't have been hired and they knew to keep him away and cover his face.
THEY KNEW.
"In a patent infringement lawsuit between Columbia University and NortonLifeLock Inc., Quinn Emanuel, representing Norton, was sanctioned for disobeying a judge's order. The court found the firm's conduct "egregious," leading to increased damages against Norton. " - Mr. Beast's Litigation law-firm of choice.
Underrated comment
When I search that case I dont see quinn emanuel as the one who represents norton, where do you see this and where did you find that quote if it is one.
@@bearsonboxes3302 It's literally the first google search result in Columbia vs Norton life lock lol
@@bearsonboxes3302 Maybe it's not a quote
"So i found out That I'm innocent"
ahh Investigation 💀
I refuse to believe that they had no knowledge of Delaware being a criminal
This statement does not read like an independent investigation, it reads like something a defense lawyer would put out.
Its wild that Chris Tyson wasn't removed a looong time ago honestly
@topdeckkek2266 yeah it's just insane how upside down ass backwards everything is
Jimmy knew 100% that Chris was attracted to minors and theres new evidence of this that has been confirmed true. Rosanna Pansino's new video. And Chris Tyson was employed at the company the entire time. Yet the law firm statement said they found that they didn't knowingly employ people with problematic stuff. The law firm were withold information here. Guaranteed.
He used the trans victim card
He put on makeup and got shielded with it.
I like how they add "AND MINORS" in the first bullet point, failing to address the fact that CP was shared between company employees, including MrBeast himself, as shown by several other leaked chats.
*That guy is just another illegitimate scamming influencer.*
Glad we agreed to never collaborate with other creators. You never know.
@@MelRetro rina and mel
Cry more 😢 😪 😭
Sounds exactly like how Doc responded, "by the specific legal definition nothing happened"
SunnyV2 saw the Ava situation from 10 miles away but got completely trolled by Nikocado. oh well
Sunny had zero evidence that Ava was problematic, besides thinly veiled transphobia at the time.
@@Evanz111looks like a duck and quacks like a duck🤷♂️
@@Evanz111"Sunny had 0 evidence besides glaring mental issues displayed by said person along with sexual abnormalities"
@@Evanz111Sunny wasn't transphobic... It's just what YOU think!
@@Evanz111 Any one that calls out a criminal of that group get called that
MrBeast has absolutely been corrupted by money. Absolute soulless and corporate at this point.
I have a question... Have you considered inviting DogPack for an interview on stream? As far as I know, he accepts when asked, whether it's a big streamer like Ludwig, or a small streamer with a few thousand subs on RUclips. He is still not monetising any of this content, only agreeing to clarify and answer questions to further spread awareness (something that RUclips appears to be working against).
I am asking because I watched this video on your stream for the first time, and I saw how much information you and your viewers are not updated on. For example, the video from Mission Flight that you watched yesterday is not the first allegation (and not a completely convincing one either) about Mr. Beast faking charities. DogPack has shown concrete evidence of video editing, like digitally removing buildings, that his editor's behind-the-scenes footage shows already existing before the Mr. Beast crew arrived. For example.
My point is.. DogPack could come summarize all for you and your audience, and you can make your judgement after, but with all the information needed to do so. Or simply ask him to clarify too.
this, it seems like hes not fully aware
@@Entropy67 thank you! i would like to hear his opinion on what has come out so far
At this point Dogpack may aswell be controlled opposition! The last couple of blunders due to lack of research have been big distractions from all his legitimate criticisms.
@@chemicalroryHe is a human being prone to make mistakes, and I would say some of the recent blunders aren't actually blunders and you guys don't understand that reporting a crime you believe is being committed is what the FBI wants, additionally I watched the clip and Kris believed that picture to be 13 Ivanka Trump, which is still a problem because Kris believed she was 13.
Dogpack was literally tripping on mushrooms when Ludwig called him on stream a month ago, which is EXACTLY why no other big streamer has done it since
The allegations were rejected is not the same as refuted.
Basically ‘we don’t believe it’ instead of saying ‘we proved it didn’t happen’.
Mr.Beast reminds me of CIA, all the bad things only tho
ain't everything about the CIA the ''bad things''?
Na bro the CIA makes what Mr beats did look like child’s play
I might be confusing it, so don't quote me on it, but I think his mom is ex-CIA....so...
So just a copy of the CIA then?
There are good things?
Lol, like mexican politicians. Investigating oneself and found no wrong. Great!
Justin Trudeau and the Livberals have done this, and Canadian Msm is like, hmm, wow, ok!
....more like isreal politicians... "yes we levelled all 11 hospitals, but found we did no wrongdoing"... 🤷🏻♂️
I feel like the reason Mr Beast hasn't taken legal action against DogPack is because he knows legally binding subpoenas and REAL external investigation would absolutely fuck his whole enterprise.
Those dead eyes creep me out.
Its the smile. Something about it... just... Uhhhg
@@blairowens8912 Yeah very fake smile
@blairowens8912 it just looks so forced and fake
@@SwampyThingyif you made 10000 videos you would have to force smile :/ like ppl get brain.. after a while things make less fun but you keep up good face despite it.
It's just the whole face really
He could sue for defamation but he would have to provide all the discovery asked for. The team he hired only looked at documents provided by him.
The Mr beast falloff needs to be studied 😭🙏
Humans are stupid and really think strangers like them. Mr beast is no different then a stripper, just on a bigger stage.
still hits well over 100m views a video i dont think hes falling off for anyone besides twitter denizens lmao
@@jsuperhalo1but our view of him has definitely changed.
He will only fall off if his company/content (like the beast games) become such a problem that he can't upload the same videos he continues to do
@@TheRealCartman2 reality is your view, my view don't mean shit to other ppl. Unless his viewers/subscribers drop significantly, nothing is gonna change.
He’s being investigated for fraud, making 10 million in a few days on crypto scams.
Lawyers do lie, see OJ Simpson's entire defense team.
defense lawyers are expected to do everything possible to defend their client, and claiming your client is not guilty while you know he is guilty isn't a crime, the entirety of lying in a court room is a gray area that essentially comes down to "don't get caught red handed"
They wouldnt open themselves up to a perjury charge like that, but everything else was 'fair game' in that trial as I remember
How many people did this investigation? 4,500,000, thats 50,000 documents per day. Assuming 8 hour days, thats 6250 documents per hour. That's 104.16 documents per minute. That's 1.74 Documents per second. If 3 people did this, then thats 0.58 documents per second. This excludes time given to interviewers, etc. not only that, but they had to spend time finding each document, piecing together each document, finding out the relevance of each document and more. How can you read a document in less than a minute and ascertain any important data or relevance of the messages, who it is to, etc. with proper judgement. How big is the team that did this research? They have 1638 Employees. Assuming 100% of their workforce worked on this, that's 3.81 documents each per hour. 1 document every 15 minutes. They have 1000 Attorneys, and 638 "other" Employees. Let's just say the other are admin/interns looking, that's still 9.8 documents each per hour. Assuming pay for each proper admin is $30/hour, that's $459,000 in admin fees for documents alone. All 638 of these employees would also need to communicate which documents are relevant to eachother, etc.
Bro this before election is like comedy week.
I worked for a government contractor that somehow hired a felon (my company was strictly against hiring felons as I worked for the prison systems). It’s maybe possible they hired a SO unintentionally but that is a massive HR failure and Mr. Beast should be held responsible for how his company operates.
The way that they're completely denying the "allegations" is a huge red flag. After everything that was exposed, and proven, they still still try to bullshit their way through. The lies and deceit continues...
That's exposed, and proven, almost all bs for hype.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What evidence do you think they didn't see?
Actually watch the mission flight follow-up video, Mr Beast paid for those 62 surgeries today.
"I have found out that there is nothing wrong with Mr. Beast" - Mr.beast
this kinda the same as hireing a PR firm to write you a PR response so you dont look bad in public
11:20 I mean didn't MrBeast admit they did background check but still hired him because MrBeast believed the allegation to be untrue?
Where do you found this? Probably trust me bro 😂
@@MCnightchannelthere are articles from various sources such as the NY times etc claiming this. But its all allegations and the sources arent super credible lol
"Delawares" brother "Jake the Viking" said it in his video after the drama. He said his brother had a talk about his past with Jimmy and Jimmys mother before getting hired i believe.
@@MCnightchannelThe video of Jake the Viking defending his brother aka Delaware.
@@FearLegion-co8gg trust me bro
MrBeast being his own lawyer is crazy
"MR BEAST DID NOTHING WRONG!!!" - Mr beast
No way they thoroughly looked at MILLIONS of documents in a short 3 month period unless they had 100+ people doing just this part of the investigation
He's just a small indie channel, leave him alone 😔
Paying someone to do a 3rd party investigation means nothing, it has no legal weight.
What is next for Mr. Beast right now? Endorse Kamala Harris ?
he wouldnt because he knows she will come after taxing crypto
He aligns more with Trump. Don't lie to yourself.
kamala would raise taxes on him so of course not
If FBI found his diddy videos?
Every collab he does is filled with comments from AI bots, his entire audience is children... he thinks he can clear himself from an employee and friend being predatory to his audience?
The lawfirm that takes his money to investigate himself... is supposed to be honest and unbiased?
Yeah I can trust someone who considers Logan Paul a "friend"
That lawfirm is incredibly dodgy. Regarding grooming: "the allegations were rejected by the alleged victim"
Ah yes, and the wife with two black eyes, broken bones and blood coming from her nose is screaming at the police "MY HUSBAND DID NOTHING WRONG, LEAVE HIM ALONE" as they arrest him for domestic violence. The law firm knows this, they know victims will protect the assaulter, that's one reason why this law firm is doing this FOR mr beast, not for the truth.
Secondly regarding employing people with criminal history, again they say it's rejected... The brother literally said he informed them of his criminal history. So this is obviously a lie.
And finally they went though 4.5 million documents, that brought up an immediate red flag. This number OBVIOUSLY includes irrelevant files, that means they went through a few hard drives and take into account a fresh install of windows has about 300k files, that means they processed and reviewed 300k files that are not at all relevant, but counted it, a few hard drives and you're already getting to that 4.5 million number. The files that were important were less than 50, that's all they needed to look at was 50 files, but saying that wouldn't have been impressive, so they need to include every file in the statement to make it sound like it was a HUGE investigation.
That's sorta sad that I'm only the second to upvote your comment after two days. People who put a bit of effort into thinking about things in the YT comment section are often punished.
1 more day LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! 1 more VIDEO OF MRBEAST AND WE"LL FINE THE TRUTH!!!!
Millions of documents ? Let's say it's only 2 million documents, since that's the lowest amount you could have in "millionS" - if you look at each document for 1 second, that will take 555 hours. I highly doubt that there has been millions of documents.
Mr Beast paid Mr Beast a million dollars to investigate Mr Beast.
"The company isnt goingto publish something they know is false"
They didn't publish it though, mr beast did, and he certainly filtered it beforehand
Let’s just pour one out for the investigators who had to sort through 2.5 million documents when about 90% of them were childish memes being sent to each other and talking about anime. No matter how much they got paid: it wasn’t enough.
Paralegals*
I wonder if they just fed it to a computer
Diddy has conducted an internal investigation and found no wrong doing.
We looked at the evidence and changed it so we did nothing wrong
HR being glorified with the title Chief People Officer is TERRIFYING. Of course a department as trash as HR would elevate themselves like that. HR is on tier with reception work, how in the hell did we get to this point?
Dont let this distract you from the fact that Asmon is bald
Never forget
They paid a company to investigate themselves and they only had the testimonies and documents provided to them.....
Still happy to say I will never let my kids watch Mr Beast.
Delaware was probably not officially employed but just payed in cash or something like that.
7:25 People have to realize, there is no amount of money MrBeast can pay this company to lie for them that would make up for career-ending damage that would be done if it came out they covered up facts/truth.
Well you aren't lying if you are only telling the parts that are correct lol 😂
They're not lying. They just are telling the good parts of the truth.
Your brain only seems to work 50%. How do you think their law business would fare if they regularly expose their clients?
Fun fact. Anyone has a price, the price could be money or a picture of their family.
Another fun fact. You are extremely naive to believe integrity still exists.
Yeah, the company is 2.5x the revenue as Mr Beast LLC.
@@humanchannel9421a law firm is paid for their reputation. If they get caught hiding for their clients in this kind of investigation, they lose reputation and lose all the money.
They make WAY more money than Mr Beast, so they don't need him.
A law firm that does expose clients in investigations has much more credibility when they investigate and find nothing, making their value higher, not lower.
To be honest, this is the oldest trick companies use, "We have investigated ourselves and it turns out we did nothing wrong. LOL!"
This was such a horrible attempt to make himself look innocent
Mr Beast claims that the company is unbiased, but given that he is still the one that pays them for the investigation, it would be naive to assume there is not a vested interest for them to return charitable results for the Mr Beast company, as that makes it more likely they will have another business relationship in the future. Now, I'm also pretty sure that they wouldn't straight up lie in their results, because they have a reputation to uphold, but let's not forget that you don't need to *lie* in order to lie. Language can be played like an instrument
What's concerns me the most is where is chris tyson? Does he still have custody of his kid?
So based on this Chris can sue Mr.Beast for firing him for no reason.
They say no 'grooming' took place yet is that not why Chris was fired?
Now he can use this statement to sue for wrongful termination.
I believe MB's mother was both CFO and Human Resources (CPO) until very recently.
This wasn't an investigation. It was a "you're my lawyers, spin this to protect me and my company".
Yes and she was present when "Delaware" talked to her and Jimmy about his past, as stated by his brother "Jake The Viking".
Johnny Depp hired the same law firm, you loser