This guy is way off. Lennon liked the song a lot. He’s even singing it while he’s dancing with his wife. There is no mockery going on. It’s pretty cool to see Harrison playing John Lennon’s guitar, and listening to the beautiful chords being fleshed out.🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
It was Lennon who was dismissive of Harrison's songs!! Look back as far as early 1966 & you will find that John hardly participated in ANY of George's songs from that point on!! At least Paul put a lot of time & effort into George's songs. "I Me Mine" is a great song - lyrically & musically. I agree - this probably was the point where George had had enough. Fast forward to 1974 where George really laid into John yelling "where were you when i needed you". That says it all.
George's 1974 comment was specifically referring to his Concert For Bangladesh. John was going to play, but George didn't want Yoko on stage so John didn't go.
Well the reason why Paul was usually involved was he was the bass player. Likewise Ringo as drummer. John as second guitarist wasn't always required. It's as simple as that. In the same way George as a guitarist wasn't always utilised on John's and Paul's songs. You do see John very involved in 'For You Blue' and 'Something' in the Get Back film.
John had a habit, on "The White Album" and "Abbey Road," of not attending sessions where George's songs were recorded---his presence would be minimal at best and disruptive at worst. For the "Get Back / Let It Be" sessions, there was no way he could avoid being there.
John was recovering from his car crash when they worked on George's songs for Abbey Road in July 1969. He was at the earlier session for 'Something' in about April. You also see he's a big supporter of that song in the Get Back film. Both John and George as guitarists weren't always required. Paul on bass and Ringo on drums though were for nearly every track. It's as simple as that.
All you have to know to answer these questions is that Harrison played on Lennon’s album after the breakup and Ringo played on Concert for Bangladesh but Harrison and McCartney never played together again. (Correction: They did not play together for 25 years after the breakup, until Free as a Bird in 1994.)
@ Were they playing together on anthology or was it remote? Were they playing together or just working together? wasn’t concert for George post-mortem? Thanks, I’ll check on my end, too.
You’re correct. They took the tape of 1977’s Free as a Bird in 1994 and pretended John had taken a break and left them to finish it. I had forgotten about that. I amend my statement. George did not play with Paul for 25 years after the breakup. Thanks for the correction. (But even after 25 years, they quickly agreed they couldn’t work together without supervision so they hired Jeff Lynne to produce.)
They worked together on George's tribute song to John in 1981, "All Those Years Ago". But for several years following the breakup, George worked with John (on the Imagine album) but not with Paul.
@@Freedom2111 Paul, Denny and Linda overdubbed vocals on All Those Years. My correction stands. They did not PLAY together for 25 years after the breakup, until Free as a Bird.
I think George wrote and was singing I Me Mine just FOR John and Paul. He just simply had enough of their insufferable egos. You can see in Ringo’s face that he knew the end was near.
@@lucasoheyze4597 and we know “hide your love away” as a direct descendant of the everlys but I don’t know of any other Beatles song that showed Simon and Garfunkel influence.
@@philharrisson7738 wouldn’t be the first time John saw something I didn’t. Still don’t. Different rhythm, different speed, different tone: bridge is rather melancholy, let it be (esp chorus) is rather joyful. I run through SG songs, Cecilia, keep the customer satisfied, boxer, and find few that have anything in common with Beatles. But that’s subjective.
if youve heard the Nagra tapes from the morning after George quit, the people gathered before John and Yoko show up make it very clear that George quit because he was annoyed by Yoko"s presence, John elevating Yoko to his equal creative partner above George and John's distance from the group to the point were behind the scenes Yoko was doing most of the talking for John. Im sure Johns indifference to georges songs was salt in the wound, but john had always had that attitude. Paul had always kind of guided the sessions. the only thing new was the ever present succubus. also, George and Patty had a major fight and she had left him the night before, so john and yokos constant inappropriate canoodling was very annoying to george.
@@joegordon2915Pattie did not leave him until much later, after George had an affair with Ringo’s wife Maureen (and after her affair with Ron Wood). George had sent Pattie mixed signals on Clapton’s love for her, but then made her choose and she stayed with George, causing Eric to take up heroin to ease the pain. She later divorced George and married Eric. Between Eric and George they wrote 11 songs about her.
@@julianrice7577 when I hear “she left him” in this context, it was safe to believe the speaker thought or meant that was a breakup, but clearly they were still together long after.
@ and yet she did not leave him for Clapton until 1974. And it is not accurate to say “going downhill” in 1969 is synonymous with “she left him in 1969.” And btw her bio says george would come home in a foul mood after fighting with the Beatles, not the other way around.
Stop with the propaganda of McCartney not supporting or dismissing Harrison's songs. The actual recordings prove the opposite. In fact, you should be asking where Lennon is on those recordings.
Well said ; It’s flavour of the month to slag off McCartney; a lot of people liking a saint / victim and a villain, but the Beatles were never that. They were the “Fab Four” for a reason! Paul worked harder on George’s songs than anyone!
@ginghamt.c.5973 Well I think he worked harder than anyone on George's songs did.Ringo worked harder.Both John and Paul had a tendency to hog the albums.
Contrary to popular belief Paul didn't really love The Beatles that much. He loved an idea of The Beatles playing the way he wanted, doing the things he wanted. The result: no more Beatles. You trying to make it as if John was mocking I Me Mine for dancing a waltz is ludicrous.
in their final stages I don't think that The Beatles were primarily a rock and roll band. Some great work on the latter albums, but some rubbish too, especially on White Album.
Primarily just music of many flavours, but on the White Album you DO get Back In The USSR, Birthday, Me and My Monkey, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Revolution 1, Glass Onion, Yer Blues, Helter Skelter etc, so rock fans should find plenty to enjoy 🤷🏻♀️
Paul McCartney was the one who wanted to keep the Beatles together by then.Lennon and McCartney didn't like that song because it was a dig against them bickering over the music
I me mine was such a fuck you to the northern songs…. He wrote that after those arguments. All through the day “I Me Mine” is all John and Paul really said
People make a lot of these arguments and fair enough it is the Beatles 😂 But what everyone has to understand is these guys were like brothers they lived out their lives together intensely in the early years it’s natural with their individual brilliance that they grew apart. I’ve always thought that had John not been shot I believe they would have re united for live aid I believe the cause would have drove John to make it happen. George would have been the hardest to pull in but that’s just my thoughts. John and Paul were in such an insane run of song writing it’s hard to be critical of them not listening to other ideas but yes they should of treated George’s efforts with more respect I think that’s fair to say.
I’m not sure if I agree with any of this analysis. When John and Yoko are dancing their silly waltz it doesn’t seem that George is being made fun of going by his reaction. And the fact is I Me Mine is not that great a song.
Hey presenter, Listen to the Nagra tapes and you'll see/hear that Paul wasn't just involved with the arrangement, but also the composition. he was incredibly invested in this song and George was happy for his involvement. People that present bullshit like this should get their facts right. There's more to this story than the 2 movies. The Nagra tapes are the real key.
what everyone forgets is that the Beatles were just people…humans…with egos & opinions…as anyone who’s ever been in a band knows, there’s going to be disagreements; I’m sure when John, Paul, George, & Ringo were playing cover tunes without screaming fans they were a lot more agreeable; George played lead guitar on all those great old rockers then had to settle for playing almost exclusively on Lennon/McCartney songs…I’m sure he enjoyed the early success but money changes everything…once George observed Lennon & McCartney earning all those composers royalties, he thought ‘I need to tap into that’…The Beatles were close when it was them again the crazy world; Paul compared it to army buddies forced to cohabitate & John described it as the eye of the hurricane…neither had anything to do with music
There's a point when Paul and John are playing around singing two of Us when George just looks over with what looks to me like sad longing... The amateur psychologist in me thinks he's thinking why isn't it three of us, dang it?
As a project Get Back was a mess, they had painted themselves into a corner with an unrealistic turnaround time. Adding to the stress was John deciding it was a good idea to insert Yoko into the fray. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
@chrisallen8250 John admitted that he and the others were lazy and that Paul was the workaholic of The Beatles and,like most of their projects at the time it was Paul's idea,and,as usual, Paul's enthusiasm and underlying desire to get back on the road overran him and the others,but it probably didn't help that Yoko was always there,and Paul was always telling the others how to play,and the original location for the sessions at that studio,stressed them all out.They were much happier back in the Abbey Road studio during the later scenes.
The end, some say, came when Paul heard Long and Winding Road with Spector’s orchestration. Paul had rejected it and felt that if he couldn’t get his own version (now on Naked) of his own song on his own label then the collaboration had come to its end. But those seeds were sown when Brian Epstein died and Lennon famously said “now we’re fugged.” And Paul wanted Linda’s dad to take over band management but the others refused because they feared he’d have an unconscious bias, so they hired a bunch of bozos instead.
@PeterCoventry-zb2zw They hired one bozo named Allan Klein, a cigar chomping New Yorker that Paul saw through,but John refused to listen because he thought Paul's in-laws were old-money snobs and Klein was a genuine down to earth regular straight-shooting guy.The others finally had to be grudgingly admit Paul was right,particularly when Klein bought the rights to "He's So Fine" so George would have to pay him the plagiarism money he owed for "My Sweet Lord,"but a judge thought that was a little too crooked of Klein and threw his claim out.
@ that is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg of the Klein story, as you probably know. Major grifter. Funny that music copyright laws changed in 1978. If you’re interested in the He’s So Fine story, also check out the Taurus/Stairway case. Absolutely fascinating. Appealed on grounds that the judge didn’t allow the jury to hear the songs, but in the end that didn’t matter because of how the law changed. Stairway is much closer to Taurus than My Sweet Lord was to He’s So Fine, but these cases hinge more on legal requirements than music. Even crazier was Matthew Fischer’s claim on Whiter Shade of Pale’s publishing. Didn’t he steal that from Bach? And claimed ownership 40 years later?
My take is I wish 'Isn't it a pity' or 'all things must pass' would have had the beatles touch and made abby road or let it be. Instead we we got 'the long winding road' such a boring song.
The truth : without Paul there is no "Beatles"..Johns attitude wouldn't have gotten him out of liverpool..George's talent was mediocre..ringo wouldn't have a career in music period. Listen to johns ist album and it's pure crap..listen to Paul's and it's symphonic in comparison and Paul plays every instrument and in doing so he eliminated every frustration that plagued him..his Ram album was the fastest produced album compared to the Beatles rate of production and Paul was too full of great music to walk with lead boots on.
The others were right. The song "I Me Mine" sucks. The bitter truth is, except for a couple of songs, Harrison's songs were just not of the same quality as Paul and John's.
This guy is way off. Lennon liked the song a lot. He’s even singing it while he’s dancing with his wife. There is no mockery going on. It’s pretty cool to see Harrison playing John Lennon’s guitar, and listening to the beautiful chords being fleshed out.🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
The song which split The Beatles was Cold Turkey, which was rejected as a Beatles tune. So John decided to go solo.
It was Lennon who was dismissive of Harrison's songs!! Look back as far as early 1966 & you will find that John hardly participated in ANY of George's songs from that point on!! At least Paul put a lot of time & effort into George's songs. "I Me Mine" is a great song - lyrically & musically. I agree - this probably was the point where George had had enough. Fast forward to 1974 where George really laid into John yelling "where were you when i needed you". That says it all.
John and Paul were both that way, but you exaggerate it.
George's 1974 comment was specifically referring to his Concert For Bangladesh. John was going to play, but George didn't want Yoko on stage so John didn't go.
Well the reason why Paul was usually involved was he was the bass player. Likewise Ringo as drummer. John as second guitarist wasn't always required. It's as simple as that. In the same way George as a guitarist wasn't always utilised on John's and Paul's songs. You do see John very involved in 'For You Blue' and 'Something' in the Get Back film.
@@lucasoheyze4597
Who would want Yoko on stage. There is only room for musicians who could add something to a performance,Yoko could do neither.
@johnbrereton5229 I think John wanted her there for emotional support as much as anything else 🤷🏻♀️
John had a habit, on "The White Album" and "Abbey Road," of not attending sessions where George's songs were recorded---his presence would be minimal at best and disruptive at worst. For the "Get Back / Let It Be" sessions, there was no way he could avoid being there.
John was recovering from his car crash when they worked on George's songs for Abbey Road in July 1969. He was at the earlier session for 'Something' in about April. You also see he's a big supporter of that song in the Get Back film.
Both John and George as guitarists weren't always required. Paul on bass and Ringo on drums though were for nearly every track. It's as simple as that.
@@gettinhungrig2 He wasn't recovering from a car crash in 1968, when he avoided George's sessions.
Et pourtant George a été infecte envers Paul..
it’s called heroin.John was a junkie as his wife got him into it to exert more control.
I me mine .....super bass lines!
All you have to know to answer these questions is that Harrison played on Lennon’s album after the breakup and Ringo played on Concert for Bangladesh but Harrison and McCartney never played together again. (Correction: They did not play together for 25 years after the breakup, until Free as a Bird in 1994.)
@@PeterCoventry-zb2zw Not true, they recorded together for the Anthology records, Paul also played on Concert for George.
@ Were they playing together on anthology or was it remote? Were they playing together or just working together? wasn’t concert for George post-mortem? Thanks, I’ll check on my end, too.
You’re correct. They took the tape of 1977’s Free as a Bird in 1994 and pretended John had taken a break and left them to finish it. I had forgotten about that. I amend my statement. George did not play with Paul for 25 years after the breakup. Thanks for the correction. (But even after 25 years, they quickly agreed they couldn’t work together without supervision so they hired Jeff Lynne to produce.)
They worked together on George's tribute song to John in 1981, "All Those Years Ago". But for several years following the breakup, George worked with John (on the Imagine album) but not with Paul.
@@Freedom2111 Paul, Denny and Linda overdubbed vocals on All Those Years. My correction stands. They did not PLAY together for 25 years after the breakup, until Free as a Bird.
Gotta love John's dancing lol
Amazing how George topped them all with the song. "Something!"
Great video.. a quantum leap... If you know what I mean!
Oh boy! I've leaped into Paul of The Beatles! Wait! My mind isn't swiss-cheesed anymore! John! You're gonna be...!" Leaps out.
I think George wrote and was singing I Me Mine just FOR John and Paul. He just simply had enough of their insufferable egos. You can see in Ringo’s face that he knew the end was near.
Ringo always knew best..he ditched out early and went home during the Maharishnu "Enlghtenment" trip in '68,.
All Georges Beatle stuff was great... period
Amazing seeing THE BEATLES arguing in a band rehearsal just like a garage band…….
Sheesh…..
Imagine being dismissive of a BRILLIANT song like "I Me Mine" ???
Yet it was good enough to dance too. Or was that simply John obeying his orders? (Yoko's).
@@johnsergeiPaul at 3:32 "Arent they romantic? So romantic I could throw up! What drugs has that weird Jap woman been feeding him?!"
Two of us felt like lennon and McCartney doing their best simon and Garfunkel
@@MikeDavis-be8gf Everly Brothers. But I can see your point, too.
Was going to say the same, it's far more of an Everlys arrangement than Simon & Garfunkel.
@@lucasoheyze4597 and we know “hide your love away” as a direct descendant of the everlys but I don’t know of any other Beatles song that showed Simon and Garfunkel influence.
@@PeterCoventry-zb2zwLennon once said that « Let it be was Paul trying to redo Bridge over trouble water »
@@philharrisson7738 wouldn’t be the first time John saw something I didn’t. Still don’t. Different rhythm, different speed, different tone: bridge is rather melancholy, let it be (esp chorus) is rather joyful. I run through SG songs, Cecilia, keep the customer satisfied, boxer, and find few that have anything in common with Beatles. But that’s subjective.
if youve heard the Nagra tapes from the morning after George quit, the people gathered before John and Yoko show up make it very clear that George quit because he was annoyed by Yoko"s presence, John elevating Yoko to his equal creative partner above George and John's distance from the group to the point were behind the scenes Yoko was doing most of the talking for John. Im sure Johns indifference to georges songs was salt in the wound, but john had always had that attitude. Paul had always kind of guided the sessions. the only thing new was the ever present succubus. also, George and Patty had a major fight and she had left him the night before, so john and yokos constant inappropriate canoodling was very annoying to george.
@@joegordon2915Pattie did not leave him until much later, after George had an affair with Ringo’s wife Maureen (and after her affair with Ron Wood). George had sent Pattie mixed signals on Clapton’s love for her, but then made her choose and she stayed with George, causing Eric to take up heroin to ease the pain. She later divorced George and married Eric. Between Eric and George they wrote 11 songs about her.
Patty left George in the early stages of the let it be sessions later to return, because George had a hardly concealed affair.
@@julianrice7577 when I hear “she left him” in this context, it was safe to believe the speaker thought or meant that was a breakup, but clearly they were still together long after.
Read Patty’s biography. I quote: After New Year 1969 everything went downhill.
@ and yet she did not leave him for Clapton until 1974. And it is not accurate to say “going downhill” in 1969 is synonymous with “she left him in 1969.” And btw her bio says george would come home in a foul mood after fighting with the Beatles, not the other way around.
I me mine is as much a masterpiece as any. Greatnsong
Stop with the propaganda of McCartney not supporting or dismissing Harrison's songs. The actual recordings prove the opposite. In fact, you should be asking where Lennon is on those recordings.
Well John and Paul did dismiss some of George's songs at various times.
Well said ; It’s flavour of the month to slag off McCartney; a lot of people liking a saint / victim and a villain, but the Beatles were never that. They were the “Fab Four” for a reason! Paul worked harder on George’s songs than anyone!
@ginghamt.c.5973 Well I think he worked harder than anyone on George's songs did.Ringo worked harder.Both John and Paul had a tendency to hog the albums.
Paul flat out told George his songs weren’t as good as his or John’s. Then he ate his words when “All things must pass” came out
@jimrahill4357 He ate his words before that when George had the two biggest hits on Abbey Road!
Contrary to popular belief Paul didn't really love The Beatles that much. He loved an idea of The Beatles playing the way he wanted, doing the things he wanted. The result: no more Beatles. You trying to make it as if John was mocking I Me Mine for dancing a waltz is ludicrous.
You can see George is neglected and seemingly ridiculed by Paul and John
in their final stages I don't think that The Beatles were primarily a rock and roll band. Some great work on the latter albums, but some rubbish too, especially on White Album.
Primarily just music of many flavours, but on the White Album you DO get Back In The USSR, Birthday, Me and My Monkey, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Revolution 1, Glass Onion, Yer Blues, Helter Skelter etc, so rock fans should find plenty to enjoy 🤷🏻♀️
Let it be was very poor apart from three songs,The white album was/is a classic.imho
@@lucasoheyze4597 I think that "Happiness Is a Warm Gun" was the favorite of John, Paul, and me.
The White Album is a weird one. Some of their greatest songs are on there, but also some truly bad/mediocre ones.
Paul McCartney was the one who wanted to keep the Beatles together by then.Lennon and McCartney didn't like that song because it was a dig against them bickering over the music
Ouch! that hurt
I me mine was such a fuck you to the northern songs…. He wrote that after those arguments. All through the day “I Me Mine” is all John and Paul really said
No, 'It's Only a Northern Song' is a fuck you to Northern Songs! What is WRONG with you kids today??
@ why can’t it be both? I me mine is 100% about Paul and John.
@natemccollum3731Another song that was a poke in the eye to John and Paul was "Not Guilty".
I can't understand why I me mine wasn't recognized immediately as a sure hit.
It was jettisoning All Things Must Pass in favor of I've got a Feeling
People make a lot of these arguments and fair enough it is the Beatles 😂
But what everyone has to understand is these guys were like brothers they lived out their lives together intensely in the early years it’s natural with their individual brilliance that they grew apart.
I’ve always thought that had John not been shot I believe they would have re united for live aid I believe the cause would have drove John to make it happen.
George would have been the hardest to pull in but that’s just my thoughts.
John and Paul were in such an insane run of song writing it’s hard to be critical of them not listening to other ideas but yes they should of treated George’s efforts with more respect I think that’s fair to say.
True there are some excellent tracks on the White (double) Album, but also fillers such as "why don't we do it in the road' and "rocky racoon"
I Me Mine is all right but not brilliant, had to repeat the thing to flesh it out to be long enough..........
I’m not sure if I agree with any of this analysis. When John and Yoko are dancing their silly waltz it doesn’t seem that George is being made fun of going by his reaction. And the fact is I Me Mine is not that great a song.
Hey presenter, Listen to the Nagra tapes and you'll see/hear that Paul wasn't just involved with the arrangement, but also the composition. he was incredibly invested in this song and George was happy for his involvement. People that present bullshit like this should get their facts right. There's more to this story than the 2 movies. The Nagra tapes are the real key.
Sure that Paul wrote the fast part in the song : I me, me, mine
what everyone forgets is that the Beatles were just people…humans…with egos & opinions…as anyone who’s ever been in a band knows, there’s going to be disagreements; I’m sure when John, Paul, George, & Ringo were playing cover tunes without screaming fans they were a lot more agreeable; George played lead guitar on all those great old rockers then had to settle for playing almost exclusively on Lennon/McCartney songs…I’m sure he enjoyed the early success but money changes everything…once George observed Lennon & McCartney earning all those composers royalties, he thought ‘I need to tap into that’…The Beatles were close when it was them again the crazy world; Paul compared it to army buddies forced to cohabitate & John described it as the eye of the hurricane…neither had anything to do with music
“It puts me off”
That’s pretty fucked up
yoko is my favorite beatle
Same here… the most talented
There's a point when Paul and John are playing around singing two of Us when George just looks over with what looks to me like sad longing... The amateur psychologist in me thinks he's thinking why isn't it three of us, dang it?
The song was written about Paul’s wife Linda.
@@Guitarman19566you're not wrong
George points his finger to others but never includes himself
Jesus H, they must have rehearsed “Get Back” at Macca’s insistence a thousand times. That would drive anyone away.
Just like Ob La Di Ob La Da.
Bully John hey.
And maybe if the other Beatles had been nicer to Yoko,at least in John's estimation,maybe the Beatles were have lasted longer still.
As a project Get Back was a mess, they had painted themselves into a corner with an unrealistic turnaround time. Adding to the stress was John deciding it was a good idea to insert Yoko into the fray. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
@chrisallen8250 John admitted that he and the others were lazy and that Paul was the workaholic of The Beatles and,like most of their projects at the time it was Paul's idea,and,as usual, Paul's enthusiasm and underlying desire to get back on the road overran him and the others,but it probably didn't help that Yoko was always there,and Paul was always telling the others how to play,and the original location for the sessions at that studio,stressed them all out.They were much happier back in the Abbey Road studio during the later scenes.
The end, some say, came when Paul heard Long and Winding Road with Spector’s orchestration. Paul had rejected it and felt that if he couldn’t get his own version (now on Naked) of his own song on his own label then the collaboration had come to its end. But those seeds were sown when Brian Epstein died and Lennon famously said “now we’re fugged.” And Paul wanted Linda’s dad to take over band management but the others refused because they feared he’d have an unconscious bias, so they hired a bunch of bozos instead.
@PeterCoventry-zb2zw They hired one bozo named Allan Klein, a cigar chomping New Yorker that Paul saw through,but John refused to listen because he thought Paul's in-laws were old-money snobs and Klein was a genuine down to earth regular straight-shooting guy.The others finally had to be grudgingly admit Paul was right,particularly when Klein bought the rights to "He's So Fine" so George would have to pay him the plagiarism money he owed for "My Sweet Lord,"but a judge thought that was a little too crooked of Klein and threw his claim out.
@ that is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg of the Klein story, as you probably know. Major grifter. Funny that music copyright laws changed in 1978. If you’re interested in the He’s So Fine story, also check out the Taurus/Stairway case. Absolutely fascinating. Appealed on grounds that the judge didn’t allow the jury to hear the songs, but in the end that didn’t matter because of how the law changed. Stairway is much closer to Taurus than My Sweet Lord was to He’s So Fine, but these cases hinge more on legal requirements than music. Even crazier was Matthew Fischer’s claim on Whiter Shade of Pale’s publishing. Didn’t he steal that from Bach? And claimed ownership 40 years later?
Paul supported George’s songs and the evidence is in the Nagra Reels
My take is I wish 'Isn't it a pity' or 'all things must pass' would have had the beatles touch and made abby road or let it be. Instead we we got 'the long winding road' such a boring song.
The beatles ruined Yoko
John was known for ignoring Georges tracks, not even participating on several
George Said Paul was the one who ignored his music
The old credo that John seemed to have forgotten..."bros before hoes".
The truth : without Paul there is no "Beatles"..Johns attitude wouldn't have gotten him out of liverpool..George's talent was mediocre..ringo wouldn't have a career in music period. Listen to johns ist album and it's pure crap..listen to Paul's and it's symphonic in comparison and Paul plays every instrument and in doing so he eliminated every frustration that plagued him..his Ram album was the fastest produced album compared to the Beatles rate of production and Paul was too full of great music to walk with lead boots on.
The others were right. The song "I Me Mine" sucks. The bitter truth is, except for a couple of songs, Harrison's songs were just not of the same quality as Paul and John's.
I Me Mine is awful.
I agree. no one ever thinks about that song.
If Yoko would have been allowed more creative input, they’d still be making gold records to this day.