Do repressive systems produce greater literature? George Steiner, Joseph Brodsky, Mary McCarthy 1982

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 36

  • @sibengerard1856
    @sibengerard1856 3 года назад +6

    Thanks for posting...This is a Jewel...The intelligence of all Four.

  • @mayk89
    @mayk89 Год назад

    Amazing! Thank you so much for putting this document to our disposal.

  • @akiva7774
    @akiva7774 10 месяцев назад +2

    These programs were on Channel 4 in its first years. Look at the state of it now and Steiner's diagnosis of the trivialisation of culture was clearly correct. - It would be a good thing for C4 to post these Voices discussions online.

  • @light1908
    @light1908 3 года назад +5

    Fantastic! And heartbreaking that it cut when it was really heating up. Nevertheless, thank you for uploading what you had.

    • @juantorres90
      @juantorres90 2 года назад

      My God! I was building up at that point and then it got all cut out in a second!

    • @actaeonpress
      @actaeonpress 2 года назад +1

      It's on the Channel 4 website, but I can't figure out how to download it. Maybe someone from UK can, or with a proxy.

  • @husseinm.4723
    @husseinm.4723 2 года назад +3

    Such a pleasure to bask in their erudition.

  • @sacredsoma
    @sacredsoma 3 года назад +6

    damn this was so good
    where can one find the rest? I love Steiner's voice even when he gets carried away

  • @juantorres90
    @juantorres90 2 года назад +5

    Brodsky: "A poet is, in a sense, like a bird. Starts to chirp on no matter what kind of branch he alights. Literature is much older and more inevitable a phenomenon than any state and it's going to be that way".

    • @italialibera2102
      @italialibera2102 2 года назад

      Plato said already that poet is a Winged thing

  • @DEWwords
    @DEWwords Год назад +1

    I love the way McCarthy is directly in his face about his huge assumptions.

  • @filcat13
    @filcat13 2 года назад +8

    If only they would let Brodsky speak more. He comes off as deeper and more interesting than Steiner who sounds pretentious and self-important.

    • @AlgebraicAnalysis
      @AlgebraicAnalysis 6 месяцев назад

      His hypothesis betrays his pseudo-intellectualism lol

    • @JoshuaOkwuosa
      @JoshuaOkwuosa 5 месяцев назад

      I love Steiner but he takes up way too much time in the beginning and doesn’t open up for a dialogue with the other guest. It’s actually crazy the host let him ramble for so long.

  • @lucianotomaz6895
    @lucianotomaz6895 3 года назад +4

    "a great writer, in fact, doesn't need History", Brodsky (19:58)

    • @DEWwords
      @DEWwords Год назад +1

      Well, that's too woo woo for me... even if it is Brodsky.

    • @edwardsamokhvalov6720
      @edwardsamokhvalov6720 Год назад +1

      well, he might be right that a great writer does not need history eventually, but making a great writer requires quite a material.

  • @d.mavridopoulos66
    @d.mavridopoulos66 11 месяцев назад

    Great fragment. Too bad the remainder is missing.

  • @abelromero8967
    @abelromero8967 3 года назад +7

    Steiner is too constrained and formalistic in his argument. You can't generalize about the quality of Eastern vs Western art especially when those categories themselves aren't essential or even well defined. Wish the artists had spoken more in this conversation.

    • @DEWwords
      @DEWwords Год назад +1

      He's inexact, actually. It's a long list of hasty generalities wedded to questionable heroic straw figures

    • @edwardsamokhvalov6720
      @edwardsamokhvalov6720 Год назад

      way too formalistic!

  • @brucellowayne4853
    @brucellowayne4853 3 года назад +3

    7:21 anyone know who this philosopher was?

    • @freeri87
      @freeri87 3 года назад

      A.J. Ayer?

    • @brucellowayne4853
      @brucellowayne4853 3 года назад

      @@freeri87 yeah, could be. Men with differing tolerances of profundity, it must be said...

  • @waynesmith6784
    @waynesmith6784 3 года назад +6

    Mc Carthy and Brodsky have the advantage of being artists as well as intellectuals who have been actively engaged in the arts and politics of their time; Steiner, who, face it was less gifted than either has the disadvantages of having had a relatively cloistered life with a captive audience of students.

    • @juantorres90
      @juantorres90 2 года назад +1

      As a note to your comment: in one of his last interviews, Steiner declared that the work of the smallest artist will always be far more important than that of the best critic.

    • @KnowNothing-wt3ks
      @KnowNothing-wt3ks 7 месяцев назад

      @@juantorres90 I think Hero of a Thousand Faces is more important than Rebel Moon.

  • @fungalbob
    @fungalbob 5 месяцев назад

    George Steiner looking fresh here

  • @prasantbanerjee8199
    @prasantbanerjee8199 3 года назад

    Great debate. Incomplete. Alas.

  • @foofkanon
    @foofkanon 3 года назад

    Hey major what year mate.

  • @nmaurok
    @nmaurok 11 месяцев назад +1

    George Steiner telling Brodsky and Mary McCarthy that they largely exaggerate the mysteries of writing - the nerve!!

  • @williamstuart9486
    @williamstuart9486 3 года назад +2

    4 very interesting people talking. Terrrific. Is the rest of the show lost?

  • @edwardsamokhvalov6720
    @edwardsamokhvalov6720 Год назад

    There is definitely an elephant in the room that everyone (all 4 of them) tries to ignore while still keeping the conversation flowing. Did anyone feel this?