[Mathematical Linguistics] Subgroups, Semigroups, and Monoids

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 12

  • @cheevavitchawalaworn7099
    @cheevavitchawalaworn7099 3 года назад +2

    Great vids! U should also continue with ring, field, etc. That'll be very nice ☺️

  • @albertdillon6732
    @albertdillon6732 7 лет назад +3

    I am a student in computer science and we've already acquired discrete mathematics, computational theory and modern algebra. Consequently, this course is easy for me whereas it is a good opportunity to review these interesting points in this stage. Thank you for your sharing.

  • @andresgoens
    @andresgoens 4 года назад +1

    cool video! I came to them from the other side (I'm a computer scientist with a math background and was looking up stuff on semigroups). I'm very curious about how you use this in linguistics! You talk about the next video, but I can't find it on the playlist. Is there a next video, or a video where you talk about the applications to linguistics? I'd be very interested to see it!

  • @bansishah2091
    @bansishah2091 3 года назад

    At 5:41, you use the inverse.... could you please explain briefly about how inverses work when working with groups ?

  • @tokhirbeksobirjonov593
    @tokhirbeksobirjonov593 2 года назад

    Thank you

  • @francescos7361
    @francescos7361 Год назад

    Great , thanks .

  • @sachinkodagali
    @sachinkodagali 7 лет назад

    Quick question for even integers not being a monoid
    Z, * = 2 * 1 = 1 * 2 = 2 so 1 is a identity element
    Z, + = 2 + 0 = 0 + 2 = 2 so 0 is a identity element
    But as per above video, 2Z doesnt have a identity element and hence its a semigroup. Can you please elaborate?

    • @Trevtutor
      @Trevtutor  7 лет назад +7

      1 can't be an identity element of 2Z because 1 is not even, and thus not in the set.

    • @callbal392
      @callbal392 2 года назад

      They're identity elements for different operations. Since we're looking at (2Z,*), we must look for the identity element for the * operation (that being the integer 1). Since this is not present in the set 2Z, 2Z does not contain an identity element for the * operation, hence (2Z,*) cannot be a group.
      If we were looking at (2Z,+), then we would be looking for the identity element for the + operation, which is present in 2Z. Since the other 3 group axioms are satisfied, we have that 2Z is therefore a group.
      Hope this helps!

  • @tokhirbeksobirjonov593
    @tokhirbeksobirjonov593 2 года назад

    Could you teach me some problems

  • @bansishah2091
    @bansishah2091 3 года назад

    what is a dot b ?

    • @obzen12
      @obzen12 2 года назад

      you do that when you are proving closedness