Trust me! the moment I see that expression on his face, I couldn't hold my laughter, although I was in a library...and rushed to the comment section.........and .....here you are!!! well said bro, and he's fantastic.😀
You have to be the most important RUclips channel (out of hundreds) that I am subscribed to. You are providing such current information on helpful AI sources for Ph.D. students; it is very helpful and appreciated. Thank you.
00:01 The first step in writing a literature review is to come up with a structure. 01:46 Collect all the references from the most recent literature review 03:38 Use a reference manager like Mlay to organize and capture research papers 05:27 Finding high-level information and review papers for understanding organic photovoltaic devices. 07:08 Use Doc analyzer to analyze and organize documents for your literature review 08:58 Identifying important parts of documents requires specific keywords. 10:40 Using an AI tool like mlay makes it easy to generate a literature review by copying and pasting information with proper citations. 12:30 Organic photovoltaics and their future applications.
Sarcasm is not always obvious to me. I was prepared to disagree with you on Sci-Hub, but that pause and that expression made me rethink and then I realised it was sarcasm.
This video gave so much hope. I’ve been in my literature review section for almost 3 years due to being resistant to optimizing AI but I’m going to use these tools to get over this Proposal stage. It’s been too long!
Thank you for sharing, Andy! This is phenomenal in terms of being such a realistic, practical and actionable workflow. It's great to see the use of both Seed and Discover back-to-back as well. Seeing the rate of how quickly you pull this together isn't just impressive, but really reflective of the nature of research and how rapidly its evolving. Not so long ago, researchers were sifting manually through paper references -- and what used to take months is now done in seconds. Amazing, and intriguing to see how it all develops.
Thank you a lot, Andy .. I am a new Ph.D. student and I feel really frustrated, lost and don't know where to start since I am doing it 100% online... but you gave me a great roadmap to leap forward! Many thanks
This helped me a lot. When I think how I had to do this in the early 2000s. Going to the library, searching the book if available at all, standing in line at the copier for hours, crying silently in a corner... ;)
When I started framing my dissertation, I had a document that had categories that matched my major themes and sub-themes. I practically lived on Google Scholar doing keyword searches. Articles that are essentially mini-literature reviews of extant and current literature are the biggest time savers. As I did it, I created my reference list and put it into alpha order with DOI and the existing citations that the articles provided. Worked great.
Man, I do not have other words than that: I Love You. By knowing all the tips and talking about it so fluently I guess you could be an AI... or you are
what an amazing video, thank you so much Andy! 👏🔥 just starting my PhD adventure and I'm pretty sure all these tools will make a huge difference! All the best!
Thanks you Andy. One of your videos guided me successfully through the PhD application and interview process. This particular video is perhaps the most crucial and up-to-date resource for initiating my PhD journey. Much appreciated.
Love this! I tried asking my professors about tech tools (AI or not) for literature review and I got a blank stare. Maybe some of them are too far into their careers to feel the need to try a new tool. But the reality is that not learning how to use these tools responsibly will put you behind your peers. I use AI all the time to help process the vast amounts of reading I have to do, quiz myself on topics, and other supportive tasks. I obviously do the real work myself, otherwise I'm not learning (i.e., the point of the degree).
My advisor did his PhD in 1970s, with no internet. Wonder how they did it back then - it was quality over quantity. While amount of research has increased several fold, the fact that 'less is more' holds true to this day.
OMG! These tools would literally save me hours of manually searching literature. Thank you, Andy! From experience, which is better between Litmaps and Connected Papers?
This is fantastic. I guess Elsevier thinks we are just going to figure this out, but it is so quirky and buggy, as you point out, that it is hard to know what it is doing half the time. Thanks very much for explaining it. I thought my system config was all wrong. It turns out it is very useful, but bad software that requires patience and a persistence to see what it loaded correctly and what it didn't.
THANK YOU! I have detested doing Lit Reviews since my BA and I have never been able to master them. I feel like I can apply this video to my dissertation next year. Thank you so very much!!!
Wonderful video as always! However, I respectfully disagree with the point made at 3:07. I believe the importance of the reference (node) is made by the size of the circle more than its position in the chart.
Anyone who is left with 6 month of PhD degree and browsing Andy's videos?)) Just subscribed to the docanalyzer. Totally worth the 12$. Thank you very much for the tips Andy! Keep the great work! Saving lazy people's life haha))
Hi Andy, I love your videos. Have you thought about doing a video series, showing your favorite AI tools and how to use them in combination to complete a research paper. Honestly, you have so many videos, with so many tools, it becomes overwhelming. Just some food for thought.
Another great information-packed edition, am trying to start my review currently and struggling to find papers on what I feel are relevant! Thanks for this great video they certainly make me think more lol
Looking at the bits we should not do. There was also paper exchange groups in Facebook, I'm sure they may exist elsewhere now. If your university/research centre has access to a paper that someone else does not and vice versa, you could request in those places and fulfil requests for others. I used that a lot back in the day. Now that all my old classmates are already academics, I just pester them instead ^_^ as I'm the one who changed academic interest 5 times and thus still doing her first PhD.
Dear Andy and readers, I'm delighted to have found this channel, which has been a significant aid in my writing. I'm seeking guidance on how to use Elicit and/or Connected Papers effectively. My confusion lies in whether I need to individually locate and download each paper? Are these platforms designed to help me summarize the content without full access to the papers themselves? I'm feeling overwhelmed by the time it takes to find each document, which hampers my progress. Any advice, tips, or even links to Andy's videos that offer a detailed explanation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
I booked a writing retreat and used this video as a guide for writing my literature review and I was quite disappointed. I already had the paid version of chatgpt, but paid for doc analyser and litmaps to make sure I was getting the most out of this three day writing retreat. Waste of money. My advise would be to stick with the paid version of chatgpt, ask it for help refining your questions to guide your lit review. Once you have your questions, upload two or three documents at a time and ask it to summarise them. Then start asking it the questions it helped you refine. Once you’ve asked it 7 or 8 questions open a new chat and do the same with that chat. However, you need to keep reminding it with every question to provide citation and page number. Also to tell you when it’s using a direct quote or when it’s doing the analysis for you.
Thank you. I have the paid verison of chatgptp, and was thinking about buying buying docanalyzer, but you tips about refining ChatGpt use seems it will be helpful. I appreciate it.
@@yume4437yeh I didn’t use litmaps at all and doc analyzer maybe works better in some areas of research than others. I wasted 2 days on doc analyser before realising that no matter what I done, chatgpt was much more efficient for refining my questions and analysing my documents. ChatGPT spat out an awful lot of repetition though - out of more than 21k words I was only able to use about 3000 or so and that was after some really heavy editing.
it was good. thank you Dr. Andy. i have a suggestion or maybe a request rom you. which is you could also make some longer video and do the whole process with more details and come up with solid samples you make out of this process at the end. just a request.
Excellent video. Super appreciative of these videos and the work you do. Being able to demystify the PHD process and make it more manageable if truly helping the next generation of Docs out there. Keep up the excellent work.
Great video. Seems like a very practical and straightforward way to conduct a Lit. Review. I would like to have an opinion on the part about taking notes. It seems that Andrew works directly on a Word document. I have been using the Zettelkasten methodology and Obsydian. However, my impression is that the work in building the notes and the connection is not adding value to the actual writing down of the final lit. review document. Did someone have some experience with this? Did the Zettelkasten method add value or is redundant (a waste of time) in the actual AI-powered research environment?
Thank you very much. That is nice and helpful. Kindly, put the links to these apps, please. It will be easier to find the exact one when we try to google them.
Informative, helpful, and brilliant as always. I am a new PhD, and your channel is my guidance. I have a question. Should we focuse on one single topic during the PhD in Australia? Could the PhD be done by publishing a groupe of papers on analysising different data in the same field?
Hey Andy! I'm a researcher coming back to the game after a few years off with babies. Been watching all your videos to catch up on how to answer big question using new tech. The only thing that I am not able to find yet is help with qualitative interviews. What are you suggesting people use for that?
@@vugar_ibrahimov every sites requires you to give out sign up data to use their services . It takes couple of clicks to give out data to unnecessary sites . that’s why i asked for him to mention clearly about the free sites amongst them all which takes 2 seconds too . At this point this youtube account only seems to post or market about sites to gain views but not to help.
I love your videos!!! My field is Business and my dissertation is on Construction Labor Productivity. I love the tools you mention but the number of papers that come back are relatively few. Is there a way to fix that? I have had some success by iteratively finding key words or phrases in relevant paper titles and using that in the search field for tools like Elicit and Paper Digest.
These are useful tools; however, it is intended more for the replication of technical knowledge rather than for the creation of new knowledge, especially in the humanities and social sciences. You can definitely use it to write a technical literature review, but using it to write a literature review to argue your point will not be possible. It's best to use these apps as a way to cut down on time or organize resources. The more I use AI, the more I realize that these technologies are not about creativity and innovation, but about efficiency. However, this speed-up does not automatically mean the quality of thinking, writing, or making something. These technologies paradoxically embody the logic of capitalism with its mechanization, acceleration of the process of creating a product, and, at the same time, deprivation of subjectivity and a decrease in quality.
Would you please make (or share) a video that actually teaches how/what to do a good lit rev? I always struggle with it. Using AI is okay as king as I know why I am doing what. Please.
"DEFINITELY DON'T DO THAT". I love that face there, Andy!!! 😃
These are exceptionally perfect tips.
Trust me! the moment I see that expression on his face, I couldn't hold my laughter, although I was in a library...and rushed to the comment section.........and .....here you are!!! well said bro, and he's fantastic.😀
I thought he was serious with his words hah
He definitely had me going... 😅
😅😅😅😅 yes not good
no no no good. le terrible. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You have to be the most important RUclips channel (out of hundreds) that I am subscribed to. You are providing such current information on helpful AI sources for Ph.D. students; it is very helpful and appreciated. Thank you.
Your comments sounds Iranian 😅
I also warned my students about Sci-Hub and showed in detail what they should avoid doing.
I normally don’t comment on videos, but just want to express the love to your channel, especially the warning part about sci-hub 😂
why don't you comment? not commenting is not something to be proud of.
@@vugar_ibrahimovshy people exist.
Library Genesis also exists, but we shouldn't use it.
@@michaellillich1298definitely, I do not use libgen and plus I do not use z llibrary either.
O yeah, very important advice 😉😂😂😂
Hahahah.. true
00:01 The first step in writing a literature review is to come up with a structure.
01:46 Collect all the references from the most recent literature review
03:38 Use a reference manager like Mlay to organize and capture research papers
05:27 Finding high-level information and review papers for understanding organic photovoltaic devices.
07:08 Use Doc analyzer to analyze and organize documents for your literature review
08:58 Identifying important parts of documents requires specific keywords.
10:40 Using an AI tool like mlay makes it easy to generate a literature review by copying and pasting information with proper citations.
12:30 Organic photovoltaics and their future applications.
Hey you missed 4:36. Don't use scihub if you can't find pdf's. It's giving away papers for free which is ruining academic research.
Thanks
Mendeley*...
Sarcasm is not always obvious to me. I was prepared to disagree with you on Sci-Hub, but that pause and that expression made me rethink and then I realised it was sarcasm.
😂😂😂
I was expecting him to wink
Sci-Hub carried me for my senior undergrad capstone hehehe
the sci-hub part is brilliant! thx a lot for your work
This video gave so much hope. I’ve been in my literature review section for almost 3 years due to being resistant to optimizing AI but I’m going to use these tools to get over this Proposal stage. It’s been too long!
Thank you for sharing, Andy! This is phenomenal in terms of being such a realistic, practical and actionable workflow. It's great to see the use of both Seed and Discover back-to-back as well.
Seeing the rate of how quickly you pull this together isn't just impressive, but really reflective of the nature of research and how rapidly its evolving. Not so long ago, researchers were sifting manually through paper references -- and what used to take months is now done in seconds. Amazing, and intriguing to see how it all develops.
Thank you a lot, Andy .. I am a new Ph.D. student and I feel really frustrated, lost and don't know where to start since I am doing it 100% online... but you gave me a great roadmap to leap forward!
Many thanks
How is everything going ?
did you manage to start?
This helped me a lot. When I think how I had to do this in the early 2000s. Going to the library, searching the book if available at all, standing in line at the copier for hours, crying silently in a corner... ;)
When I started framing my dissertation, I had a document that had categories that matched my major themes and sub-themes. I practically lived on Google Scholar doing keyword searches. Articles that are essentially mini-literature reviews of extant and current literature are the biggest time savers. As I did it, I created my reference list and put it into alpha order with DOI and the existing citations that the articles provided. Worked great.
Man, I do not have other words than that: I Love You. By knowing all the tips and talking about it so fluently I guess you could be an AI... or you are
When you said looking up papers was the 'fun part' (relatively speaking at least), that is when I knew for sure that you are legit.
never before have I been so excited to do a lit review!!!
Andy, you have been a God's sent to my doctoral dissertation! Thanks a bunch for this fantastic work!
I never thought I would be so informed and entertained when I clicked on this video. Thank you for the chuckle.
agreed!
Hi Andy, I'm a masters student but your channel is still so helpful, thank you
what an amazing video, thank you so much Andy! 👏🔥 just starting my PhD adventure and I'm pretty sure all these tools will make a huge difference! All the best!
Thanks you Andy. One of your videos guided me successfully through the PhD application and interview process. This particular video is perhaps the most crucial and up-to-date resource for initiating my PhD journey. Much appreciated.
Love this! I tried asking my professors about tech tools (AI or not) for literature review and I got a blank stare. Maybe some of them are too far into their careers to feel the need to try a new tool. But the reality is that not learning how to use these tools responsibly will put you behind your peers. I use AI all the time to help process the vast amounts of reading I have to do, quiz myself on topics, and other supportive tasks. I obviously do the real work myself, otherwise I'm not learning (i.e., the point of the degree).
Kahubi is worth mentioning, also super useful when you do a literature review
My advisor did his PhD in 1970s, with no internet. Wonder how they did it back then - it was quality over quantity. While amount of research has increased several fold, the fact that 'less is more' holds true to this day.
80% of phds are useless papers and wasted time
Conversely the amount of published scientific literature back then was much smaller and more easy to overlook.
Thank you so much! I'm a high school student writing my first literature review and this really helped!
You're so welcome!
OMG! These tools would literally save me hours of manually searching literature. Thank you, Andy!
From experience, which is better between Litmaps and Connected Papers?
I love how current and up-to-date your videos are. Thank you as always!
ALL THESE TIPS AND TOOLS ARE AMAZING!! Thank you so much !
Andy, so grateful for this video. You are The ultimate Academia Robinhood. God Bless you.
OMG, it´s going to help me a lot, i just have to do the tables with all the informatión, it would be the last i would search
This is fantastic. I guess Elsevier thinks we are just going to figure this out, but it is so quirky and buggy, as you point out, that it is hard to know what it is doing half the time. Thanks very much for explaining it. I thought my system config was all wrong. It turns out it is very useful, but bad software that requires patience and a persistence to see what it loaded correctly and what it didn't.
You are a super generous man and thank you so much for sharing your tips and knowledge. Really appreciated it.👍👍
THANK YOU! I have detested doing Lit Reviews since my BA and I have never been able to master them. I feel like I can apply this video to my dissertation next year. Thank you so very much!!!
Wonderful video as always! However, I respectfully disagree with the point made at 3:07. I believe the importance of the reference (node) is made by the size of the circle more than its position in the chart.
Anyone who is left with 6 month of PhD degree and browsing Andy's videos?)) Just subscribed to the docanalyzer. Totally worth the 12$. Thank you very much for the tips Andy! Keep the great work! Saving lazy people's life haha))
Must say though, your videos got a lot more interesting to follow! Make me watch several times and still laugh!
"Definitely should not go to sci hub " , Now that's clever wording !!
Hi Andy, I love your videos. Have you thought about doing a video series, showing your favorite AI tools and how to use them in combination to complete a research paper. Honestly, you have so many videos, with so many tools, it becomes overwhelming. Just some food for thought.
Great idea! I'll add it to my list of video. Thank you for the suggestion.
Great vid Andy.. I've been thinking of using scite instead of elicit. Would love your take on how scite is different from elicit for lit reviews?
PhD Student over here, amazing video, thanks for the knowledge
Another great information-packed edition, am trying to start my review currently and struggling to find papers on what I feel are relevant! Thanks for this great video they certainly make me think more lol
DEFINITELY DON'T DO THAT". I love that face there, Andy!!! 🤣 Exceptional! Great work !
You should use Zotero!
Looking at the bits we should not do. There was also paper exchange groups in Facebook, I'm sure they may exist elsewhere now. If your university/research centre has access to a paper that someone else does not and vice versa, you could request in those places and fulfil requests for others. I used that a lot back in the day. Now that all my old classmates are already academics, I just pester them instead ^_^ as I'm the one who changed academic interest 5 times and thus still doing her first PhD.
Not all heroes wear capes! you are amazing, thank you so much for all that you share.
05:05 ,Roger that , message received loud and clear.
Dear Andy and readers,
I'm delighted to have found this channel, which has been a significant aid in my writing. I'm seeking guidance on how to use Elicit and/or Connected Papers effectively.
My confusion lies in whether I need to individually locate and download each paper?
Are these platforms designed to help me summarize the content without full access to the papers themselves? I'm feeling overwhelmed by the time it takes to find each document, which hampers my progress.
Any advice, tips, or even links to Andy's videos that offer a detailed explanation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Dude telling you what not to do by showing you what exactly you need to do ;) Lit!
I booked a writing retreat and used this video as a guide for writing my literature review and I was quite disappointed.
I already had the paid version of chatgpt, but paid for doc analyser and litmaps to make sure I was getting the most out of this three day writing retreat. Waste of money.
My advise would be to stick with the paid version of chatgpt, ask it for help refining your questions to guide your lit review.
Once you have your questions, upload two or three documents at a time and ask it to summarise them. Then start asking it the questions it helped you refine.
Once you’ve asked it 7 or 8 questions open a new chat and do the same with that chat.
However, you need to keep reminding it with every question to provide citation and page number. Also to tell you when it’s using a direct quote or when it’s doing the analysis for you.
Thank you. I have the paid verison of chatgptp, and was thinking about buying buying docanalyzer, but you tips about refining ChatGpt use seems it will be helpful. I appreciate it.
@@yume4437yeh I didn’t use litmaps at all and doc analyzer maybe works better in some areas of research than others. I wasted 2 days on doc analyser before realising that no matter what I done, chatgpt was much more efficient for refining my questions and analysing my documents. ChatGPT spat out an awful lot of repetition though - out of more than 21k words I was only able to use about 3000 or so and that was after some really heavy editing.
Thanks Andy this is very helpful your video are my source of help being an online student gets very lonely
it was good. thank you Dr. Andy. i have a suggestion or maybe a request rom you. which is you could also make some longer video and do the whole process with more details and come up with solid samples you make out of this process at the end. just a request.
Love your videos and that fantastic green shirt!
Thanks so much!
Excellent video. Super appreciative of these videos and the work you do. Being able to demystify the PHD process and make it more manageable if truly helping the next generation of Docs out there. Keep up the excellent work.
Andy, you are an effing genius! Thank you for this!
Save my life. Thank you, Dr. Andy.
Stellar video and info. Zotero = Ref Manager & PDF management
You are precious 🥺and i mean it 🤭.My goodness the struggle was real before these tips.
Thanks Andy for providing such an informative information in such a beautiful and brilliant way
Glad you enjoyed it
You're doing an amzing job helping us, Thank you so so much
my seocnd comment in the same video, this is genius ! OMG I am flattered
Thanks sooooooooooo much for sharing your experience. And for your advice
You should try the Undetectable AI Human Auto Typer for smth manually typing your copy paste context
“This mf don’t miss!” Dr. Stapleton is the GOAT.
Great video. Seems like a very practical and straightforward way to conduct a Lit. Review. I would like to have an opinion on the part about taking notes. It seems that Andrew works directly on a Word document. I have been using the Zettelkasten methodology and Obsydian. However, my impression is that the work in building the notes and the connection is not adding value to the actual writing down of the final lit. review document. Did someone have some experience with this? Did the Zettelkasten method add value or is redundant (a waste of time) in the actual AI-powered research environment?
Thank you 🙏 what a useful video - very simple and informative 👍👍👍
This is the most interesting video I have ever watched. Your channel is sweet guy. Keep it up❤
My god you're really saving me here!! Thank you so much!
Thank you very much. That is nice and helpful. Kindly, put the links to these apps, please. It will be easier to find the exact one when we try to google them.
An entertaining explanation!
Thanks a lot.
This is fantastic information, thank you for sharing all of this information for students!
Thank you Andy such a wonderful and useful content👍
Warning about scihub well taken into consideration. Haha.
Thanks for the awesome videos
Thank you sir for wonderful tips sharing ❤
Gotta save it somewhere for my own literature review.... 😮
Bro, you saved my life. ❤
Informative, helpful, and brilliant as always. I am a new PhD, and your channel is my guidance.
I have a question. Should we focuse on one single topic during the PhD in Australia? Could the PhD be done by publishing a groupe of papers on analysising different data in the same field?
Hey Andy! I'm a researcher coming back to the game after a few years off with babies. Been watching all your videos to catch up on how to answer big question using new tech. The only thing that I am not able to find yet is help with qualitative interviews. What are you suggesting people use for that?
A thoroughly marvelous video, well done, very useful.
you are saving my life!!!!!
Haha scihub reference was funny. I have been NOT promoting it all my life as well 😏
u saved me!! i love this!!
which ones are subscription based apps ? It would be nice if you could also mention which ones are free and paid ones clearly
checking that is a work of a couple of minutes
@@vugar_ibrahimov every sites requires you to give out sign up data to use their services . It takes couple of clicks to give out data to unnecessary sites . that’s why i asked for him to mention clearly about the free sites amongst them all which takes 2 seconds too . At this point this youtube account only seems to post or market about sites to gain views but not to help.
Oh finally a human talking about ai 🎉🎉🎉
your cool and funny sarcasm about science hub got me hahahaha, I am subscribing to your channel
Thanks, please make your next recommended videos clickable on the video. it's easier
Hey Andy Great video. Do you use endnote? Which one do you prefer- Mendley or Endnote?
Thank you for the very useful information!
this video is exceptional! thank you!
The Sci-Hub part, you got me😂😂😂😅
I love your videos!!! My field is Business and my dissertation is on Construction Labor Productivity. I love the tools you mention but the number of papers that come back are relatively few. Is there a way to fix that? I have had some success by iteratively finding key words or phrases in relevant paper titles and using that in the search field for tools like Elicit and Paper Digest.
These are useful tools; however, it is intended more for the replication of technical knowledge rather than for the creation of new knowledge, especially in the humanities and social sciences. You can definitely use it to write a technical literature review, but using it to write a literature review to argue your point will not be possible. It's best to use these apps as a way to cut down on time or organize resources. The more I use AI, the more I realize that these technologies are not about creativity and innovation, but about efficiency. However, this speed-up does not automatically mean the quality of thinking, writing, or making something.
These technologies paradoxically embody the logic of capitalism with its mechanization, acceleration of the process of creating a product, and, at the same time, deprivation of subjectivity and a decrease in quality.
Thank you for this very insightful comment! :-)
I write using Claude AI and to make it undetected, I humanized them using Undetectable Ai
You are so strong, A+
This is amazing! Thanks so much.
Would you please make (or share) a video that actually teaches how/what to do a good lit rev? I always struggle with it. Using AI is okay as king as I know why I am doing what. Please.
Tq Dr for your info. Really save my day
this is really good content, thank you !
You’re a legend
Love your video, especially the warning about Sci-hub 😂
life changing video
Thank you for the video. What is the difference between petal and docanalyser? Do you prefer docanalyser over petal?