Justin Baldoni Made This Big MISTAKE In His Amended Lawsuit Against Blake Lively And Ryan Reynolds:
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
- 😳 #JustinBaldoni #BlakeLively #RyanReynolds
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @perezhilton
Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: PerezPodcast.com
Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at / perezhilton
Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: / perezhilton
WEBSITE: PerezHilton.com
PEREZ'S INSTAGRAM: / theperezhilton
WEBSITE'S INSTAGRAM: / perezhilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: www.cameo.com/...
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE'S FACEBOOK: / perezhilton
PEREZ'S FACEBOOK: / theperezhilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: / perezhilton
PEREZ'S TWITTER: / theperezhilton
Check out my merch: BuyPopStuff.com
About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two RUclips channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films - as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!
Justin Baldoni Made This Big MISTAKE In His Amended Lawsuit Against Blake Lively And Ryan Reynolds:
• Justin Baldoni Made Th...
Perez Hilton
/ perezhilton
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Enjoy my channel? Become a member! Your support would be SO APPRECIATED! Plus, you'd get a badge that shows up every time you comment, access to my members-only lives every weekday at 7:15 PM EST and more! Subscribe to get access to all the perks HERE: ruclips.net/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Qjoin
So wish I could. Unfortunately, all of my money is going to 5 doctors and the hospital. Cancer is insanely expensive to treat!! Have you even slept in the last week?! I'm watching ALL the videos you drop! Thanks for staying on top of this and keeping us so well informed! You're the best!! Much Love from the beach, in SC ❤❤❤
Mr. Perez sir! You are the goat! 🐐 a god among men! You don’t just have it! You are it! You are literally the spokesperson for a new generation now! I was watching another channel (a news channel) and they quoted you regarding this case!
I’m so grateful that you are still kicking ass! I loved you back in the day and now my daughter is loving you ❤️❤️
I canceled my subscription to The New York Times last week. I no longer trust them.
Better late than never.
cant believe it took this long lol
As well you shouldn’t!
The NYT never contacted Kjersti Flaa for a comment. They’re the sloppy sleuths.
Me too, I was so dissatisfied by their misjudgment and misuse of the journalistic code, which basically values integrity and truth while investigate different sources before judging and publishing.
New York Times needs to take SEVERAL seats. They haven’t been truthful in YEARS.
They interviewed themselves on this. Can’t trust them.
Since the Pentagon Papers of Daniel Ellsberg.
That was the last time they did true journalism and speak true to power.
I love it. The New York Times running for cover by gaslighting internet investigators & the public. They didn’t bother to reach out to JB before releasing an article full of serious life altering accusations. Mainstream “journalism “ is dead. Long live the serious internet investigators.
They have been horrible for decades
Facts!!
I don't understand her! She likes Harvey Weinstein and Woody Allen but she has problems with Baldoni who tried everything he could to make her happy
Ikr!
She is a part of hollywoods evil cult. We are fighting a spiritual war between good and evil.
Like attracts like
both had much more power than justin so she had to gain from them. understand it not through morality lens but through perceived power and connections.
She just likes power.
The only mistake Baldoni made was not getting her to sign the actor agreement before beginning filming. Then she wouldn't have been able to use her promotion of the movie against them at every turn. Sickening how she manipulated everything and stole the movie he worked on for years. She'll get her karma as now she is a big liability for anyone to work with. Her narcissism is being exposed. I love that she admitted to the media that her husband wrote the rooftop scene. She is sadly pathetic. It's too bad she didn't put that much energy into being a good actress as she did in trying to destroy him.
And being too nice 😂
Amen!
Great points @daraberger7065. I would also add. Justin's second mistake was not setting appropriate, professional role, boundaries more clearly, assertively, and consistently with Blake. Narcissists ALWAYS push!! They push, push, push, and push. No is the only answer. Period. Offering up an alternative for the demon narc to sink their conniving ego into is also a nice tactic as a deflection if necessary. But No is always first. He 'massaged' her ego too much. He needed to replace all the ego massage with more silence, less attention, and more boundaries. A bit of ego massaging is understandable. Lastly I would add that this demonic thing called BL is not only a narc. But also a sociopath. The malignant narcissism is off the charts and definitely in the realm of sociopathy bordering closer to psychopathy! I am glad Justin had support financially on this lawsuit. To think how devastating if he hadn't. And yes. Why didn't she put this effort and work into the character? A big lesson for Hollywood, contractual agreements and legal must dos in preproduction film timelines. This lawsuit will effect many facets of Hollywood contracts from now on.
@abigailmacaria7717 what makes you say she is a psychopath?
The biggest mistake was to cast her at all. Big miss judge of character.😮
I hope Blake gets booed at the Super Bowl.
@shiitake1521- me to! 🤞🙏🏻
And swift
She ain’t going. Taylor’s gotta know that’s a career-killer for her too (even if temporarily)
The Snake most likely won’t have the gall to go.
There is NO WAY she is invited!! I will put money on it. TS cares more about her career than to be seen with the most hated women in America!
The NYT has lost its credibility
“Plantation Barbie” is literally the funniest name ever!!
Amateur internet sleuths are more professional than NYTimes journalists. How condescending
Yep. NYT "journalists" can be bought and are told what to say and what to ignore. This whole debacle has been the last nail in the mainstream media coffin. No one is googling news articles trying to figure out what's going on with this case. We all get on social media and look for independent journalists.
We’re more honest too. They most always have a hidden agenda
Oh please... The NYT no longer has any credence; they are scrambling to remain relevant.
Because journalists have agendas. They side the right people to keep their jobs or for personal ambitions. I don't trust most of them.
Agree. I hope they don’t get away with this one.
New York Times has been helping out who has the most money not with who is being TRUTHFUL.
Blake Lively seems one of the most self-unaware people through all the revelations
She thinks she’s the Lord’s gift to acting / producing / directing/ screen writing / everything under the sun. Probably due to never being told no and being spoiled her entire life.
She's taking a page out of Trump's playbook...lie, lie and lie some more.
Equal to megen markel
@@pattihorigan8700i bet you think democrats are for democracy
@@aliceobrien8390 I was just thinking the same. I wonder who would win if there was only the one microphone and camera in the room. 😅
NYT EDITED THE TEXTS!!! THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH
Yes!!
Or maybe Blake's publicist did?
@@PerezHilton NYT told Justin he has 14 hours to respond, but published in 12. It was a hit piece. The NYT are supposed to be the adults in the room.
@@PerezHiltonThats what I was thinking. Maybe her publicist handed over what she wanted them to see. But the fact that they still aren’t admitting to any wrongdoing is wild. You would think after all these receipts are being shown that someone over there would say…hmmm the texts we were given weren’t the whole story and we’re looking into it. Idk maybe they dont want to admit they f-ed up.
Thanks for breaking down the new info this weekend. It was a lot ❤
@@RuthSmith-o1g Not really 12 hrs to respond if NYT counted overnight hours when people are usually asleep!
I don’t know when Jennifer Aniston started following Justin on Instagram, but I know for a fact (because during the Johnny Depp trial I checked a lot of celebs to see if they were backing him up), that Jennifer (and others like Diane Keaton) started to follow Johnny RIGHT after Amber went on stand in trial haha.. like 1-2 days after
. I LUUUUV that Jennifer isn’t afraid to take a stand. SHE is an A lister and let’s be real FAR more credit than RR and BL!
Kjersti Flaa has mentioned Aniston as being extremely kind. This makes me like her more. Good for her!
LOVE JEN!! ❤️
Aniston is so fake herself.
@@Laurenpvu okay.. Well you can think that if you want, but you can’t deny that she got balls to take a stand
@Laurenpvu nope...
The fact that The NYT didn`t have the claim doesn`t mean that they weren`t aware of what will be included in the claim. They clearly worked with BL, so they knew even without an official complaint. If they don`t believe the internet, fine, invite any expert - they will explain any metadata. The girl who found the information knew what she was doing. By attacking and gasslighting the people they are just giving more reasons to dislike them,
For sure, so not logical for Google to have a random date as a part of the data that you can see. If they ever got questioned there is no way that they would back that up.
Even if we don't look at the images, the embedded texts say Oct 31. NYT is not trustworthy and colluded to bring down a man so Megan Twohey could say she "did it again". Such arrogance. She needs to go down as the worst journalist.
The NYT just picks a fight with the public and now said public is going to clap back.
The NYT never contacted Kjersti Flaa for a comment. They’re the sloppy sleuths.
Yup!
@@PerezHiltonclapping haaaard too!!!!
Understand the legal jargon by that NYT, they’re saying they didn’t have the complaint before she filed it. They likely didn’t. It’s nuances here. They instead had all of the information that she was gathering to put into the complaint. That’s what they’re going to stand. Standby. Read between the lines. They still had all of the information and should be held accountable.
Absolutely 💯%. The NYT colluded with Lively parties to smear Baldoni and the Lively parties provided the information to do it. This happened well before she had filed her complaint. Notice the NYT didn’t deny that part.
Or a "draft."
So then they should sue her, because she lied unless they colluded with her🤷🏻♀️
Well, a complaint isn't a complaint unless it is SIGNED. So, they may have the entire document and can still say they do not have the complaint because the document isn't signed.
Well, a complaint isn't a complaint unless it is SIGNED. So, they may have the entire document and can still say they do not have the complaint because the document isn't signed.
Wording is everything. The NYT's response is about when the complaint was filed/published and NOT WHEN they started working on the story or received all the information and messages.
And the files they were working on are titled "smear Justin"......they cant even say it was accidental.
@@ketty-x7t That's not a joke, right? I must've missed that
Not a joke@@bpxl53yewz29
Legacy media is dead, they missed their funeral
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Unpopular opinion, but I think comparing this entire saga to the *Johnny Depp & Amber Heard* one isn't accurate at all 🤷🏻♀ simply because, let's be honest, Johnny was in a really bad place at the time he was married to Amber & did some things too (even if- not all he was accused of)... while _Baldoni_ really doesn't seem to have any issues in his life... other thank Blake, LOL 😅 He seems like he really did nothing wrong - other than trying to please her 🤔
I agree! I don’t even think Amber heard would ever stoop so low as to sue a family man for SH bc she had to slow dance closely in a movie she signed up to do with love scenes. 😝 it’s a new low for sure.
I agree, Johnny and Justin can NOT be compared. But Blake is just as sick in the head as Amber is.
Depp was bigger than his accuser. Opposite here
@@kellykirk4244 Lol It's Blake or Amber Heard 2 you mean.
@e.a.8723 I actually think BL might be worse because she actually is abusing her real political power in Hollywood. Amber is a total clown with zero clout in Hollywood. She had/has zero political influence in Hollywood. Her only "power" was being a woman during the metoo movement.
NB: When I say "political" im.not talking about governmental politics. Im talking about organizational politics and power plays.
Shampoo Company Owner 0:14 Plantation Pricess 3:01. . .Perez is swinging with these!
I love his labels.
Yes, the Shampoo Company Owner & Plantation Princess is so funny
xoxo
Don’t forget woody Allen apologist
And I'm all for it!🎉
Based on your clip the NYT said they did not have her legal complaint in advance. They did not say they had no allegations from Lively's side that would go in the complaint.
Good catch!
It does not matter....they have no business having neither before the official lawsuit, its not like they are a law firm. They already had all the files prepared to smear Justin with 0 evidence and an intentional altered and out of context messages almost a month prior to the lawsuit.
@@ketty-x7t No, but it makes the title of this inaccurate and seems like clickbait.
Does the NYT think we are stupid?
Always
Sure just like Blake and Ryan. That's why they worked together with them. They wanted to fool a buch of non famous and non rich regular dumba*ses.
Y-E-S
No; they just are assuming only senile old boomers are their only readers.
They have been writing for stupid people for ages! Most fall for it and subscribe and are incapable of researching for themselves a little further and from direct sources.
Technically they are right. It is unrelated to when they posted it publicly. But it does have a lot of relevance to draft versions and receiving it in a directory. How do i know this? I've been a software engineer for almost 2 decades
NYT explanation doesn’t explain why they would KEEP those dates attached to each photo & only update the naming convention to say “justin smear.” Weird.
@@bymilliebphotography8249 i can explain that. They are dumb
Yep, as a front end web developer I agree. It should be easy to audit when the first draft was started and how often it was opened/edited before it was published.
Came to say the same. We all know it’s not related to when they officially posted it. The point was that they had inside info and started drafting, so Justin would not have leaked it. Saying this is google, come on, where does google get it from? My drafts don’t get magically indexed by google, i need to start a draft at least and yes date and time may vary (I had set up my account to a time zone in the EU once and took me while to realize why I would publish a post on Friday but the date listed unter it was Sat 😂 In my defense I was very new to website building at the time) but it was a few hours difference not months. The HTML didn’t magically type itself either. Not sure how their statement makes this better?
@iva_81 yes! I definitely get that defense. I've had to do the same. Their defense is so dumb
At this point, I’m as invested in this saga as I am in Perez’s facial expressions and dramatic reading of this lawsuit 🤣.
"shampoo company owner" is hilarious 😂😂😂
Putting down the sleuths was a dumb move. We are all watching a crime documentary. The only difference is the victim was left alive, barely breathing, AND ABLE TO TALK!!
Elitist left! They still don’t understand why they lost the election. Elitist mentality of the media mob is beyond repair
Sleuths vs NYT. Let’s rumble!!!
Let's cancel our subscriptions. Boycott! They insulted the "mass". They think they can collude to bring down an innocent man and get away with it.
The only people less PR savvy than Blake are her legal team.
I hardly think Bryan Freedman took that info from social media about the metadata without checking it over with a techy first to confirm it was true. NYT are full of it. Good try though.
But the way they worded it, they haven’t said that they didn’t ‘receive info’ or got a copy of the draft version beforehand. The dates are still very indicative of when they first downloaded it from Google.
Even if the NYT info is not correct Justin's lawyer was still able to drop a ton of receipts before a possible "gag" order on Monday. Win!
Justin baldoni has already won the public court! I hope he wins against nyt, and blake and ryan. He deserves being paid for the damages and emotional stress they put him under.
Attacking the public is not a good move🤣🤣🤣
The Plantation Princess dig is chef's kiss! Thanks for the updates, Perez~
Saying "you're sexy" or kissing a little too much in a scene you know you'll be kissing really isn't 'sexual harrasement' now is it?
He NEVER said “you’re sexy” to her . He was talking about her character’s look in a specific wardrobe!
@@Lillian.Gao. yes after she had already written it previously. I guess my point is I can't imagine how any of these could be deemed harrasement. On a movie about DV. Seems *really* tone deaf.
Actors are crazy!!
@@grimmwerks if you’ve read Justin’s amended lawsuit (it’s all online now), being tone-deaf is the most innocent of Blake’s crimes - “extortion” is the appropriate word for what she and Ryan did, indeed!
I agree, it's way worse than jokes about suppositories, no teeth and tattooing perineum. What a monster!
Meta data real dates can be established by experts. The word of NYT is not enough.
I found the October metadata and ran it past my dad who is a senior IT specialist. I would never have done any video with it if he didn't say it was good. I emailed Freedman on Monday and I'm assuming he's had it checked by expert to even put it in the amended lawsuit
Agree
@@leannenewton1572 Again, you are so amazing!
The link for one of the photos even has ‘Justin-smear’ on it. Is that generated by Google too? 😂
@robintay1449 thank you 🥰
Perez!!! All these updates every few minutes. You are seriously cutting into my tv watching time! 🤪
Plantation Princess 😂😂😂😂😂
Baldoni lawyers can still find other ways to check the dates
Yes as many saw in the depp vs heard ITS ALL THERE!
Dragon #1 made Nicepool have a bigger nose to mock Justin. Almost 50 and making fun of people’s looks…cool…what a great role model for his daughters. 🙄
Did Nice Pool have a large nose - I knew RR’s nice pool character had a man bun but if RR enhanced his nose that is beyond vile and disgusting and shamefully horrid , this should be detailed in the future suit against Disney
Especially considering that they have their mother's genetics and we all know Blake wasn't born with her current nose.
He’s immature and petty
such gross behavior!
@@mindybaggetta00660 I looked it up and yes RR certainly did have a bigger nose as Nicepool to mock Justin - wow RR is a petty little man
Without internet sleuths we'd never have found Gaby Petito's body. I will never forget that. ❤
Amen!
R.I.P Gabby. I hope Brian's parents have faced some sort of punishment for how they prolonged the torture of her parents.
oi perez u should have read the amended lawsuit til the end. and so should have the nyt. baldoni's suit admits the dec 10 date stamp isn't indicative of the upload date or whatever. it's very techy-techy and am not gonna pretend i understand it. essentially they came to the same conclusion as the nyt. what's very telling is how come nyt did NOT address ALL THE OTHER METADATA from all the other pics/graphics in that article?!
Amber Heard should play Blake Lively in the Netflix adaption of this 😂
😂😂😂
with meghan markle as the executive producer and handbag harry as the lunch boy
🤣🤣
And Blake play Amber 😂😂😂
Omg, that would be the only way Amber could make a Hollywood comeback. I think people dislike Blake even more than Amber. She makes Amber look like a novice.
Welcome to the new world of internet slueths replacing legacy media......what matters in court when the whole planet thinks you are guilty...
‘Plantation Princess’…I’m rolling 😂
He didn't say NYTimes had actual hard copy of complaint. Livey told them she was filing a complaint and provided particulars
Best coverage of the B list actress Ryan Reynolds wife and JB...here for it all
I can understand Google having photo images pre the release of the complaint but how did Google have the private texts on their platform? That is scary and incredulous
Google software named the picture "SMEAR campaign" ? 😂😂😂😂😂
Lively’s and Reynolds’ team are wrong. They should check with software engineers and similar professionals first. Dates in the metadata show when the article was drafted/worked on:
If article was worked on months before publication, the metadata can show those earlier dates, but it depends on how the website’s CMS handles metadata.
1. Will Metadata Show When the Article Was Worked On?
• Yes, if the CMS tracks edit history: Some content management systems store multiple timestamps, such as:
• Creation Date - When the article was first drafted.
• Modification Date - When the article was last edited.
• Publication Date - When the article was made public.
• If the CMS retains and displays the creation or modification date, you might see a date that reflects when the article was originally worked on, even if it was published later.
2. If Older Dates Appear, Are They the Dates When the Article Was Worked On?
• If you see older dates in the metadata, they likely represent when the article was first drafted or edited, especially if the CMS does not update metadata when an article is published.
• However, if the system does not update the “last modified” date when final edits are made, an even older edit date might be shown instead.
How Can You Verify This?
• If you have access to the CMS, you can check the article’s revision history.
• In the page source (Ctrl + U), look for metadata like:
• If older dates appear, they likely indicate when the article was first created or edited before publication.
Can they erase all the dates but the last one. I don't trust the NYTs at all!
@@lisa68743technically yes, but if they change them, the actual dates have now already been discovered anyway so it would be too late as everyone has already found out and it would be obvious that they would have been changed now
@@lisa68743they can erase the data but that can be tracked too, we can tell when the data was erased.
Thank you
Can we finally find a whistleblower from the Times?
Now THAT would be a Pulitzer prize winner. The downfall of a media giant
Now google will also sue the couple for defamation over wrong information on how it works. 😅
NO eFFING shame #NYT !
They have to blame it on something else like google...lol
While it may be true that the filenames aee generated by google, it doesn't mean that the dates are inaccurate.
It was a nonsensical argument.
How is Google creating the file names? Are they saving the files in the cloud? The dates are still a question mark because any date will be after the original upload. The cloud would not create a date before the desktop date, anyway.
@@socialmedia12450fr sure,this makes ny times look stupid😂
Even the name had the word ‘justin-smear’ on it! Is that generated by Google too?😂😂
2:55 Get google into the courtroom too 😂
For sure,a tech expert from Google has to be consulted😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
I may have missed something but I don’t think the lawsuit claims that the NYT had access to the complaint for months but that they had colluded with the shampoo business owner’s team and that they had been working on a story pertaining to her claims for months while waiting for the complaint to be lodged.
The fact that they have been working on that story for months as shown by the metadata unveiled by “amateurs” but they waited until after the complaint was lodged and only gave his team 14 hours, ended up posting the story 2 hours before the deadline and simply wrote that his side refused to comment (when they had sent a fairly lengthy paragraph) only further shows that they were never interested in publishing a balanced news story. Quite shameful actually.
Plantation princess 😂😂😂😂
The NYT was clearly doing someone a favor 😅 So much money involved!
Does the buck stop at Disney or what? 😂 They have so much on the line 😮
NYT feels like it's leaning on legalese and technicalities. From what I understand, their response is, we couldn't have written the article about the complaint that early because we didn't have it, which they didn't. Buuut they could have had all the details that would be out in the complaint. Which means the internet sleuths are right.
I feel like they aren't actually refuting that second piece...
Or they could have had a draft version. The date is more likely to have been when they downloaded it from Google.
They should issue an apology to JB and just pay!!
I agree that the meta-data thing doesn’t make a difference in the PR sense. But in the legal sense, I think the NYT’s attorney’s response is telling. They didn’t do anything to debunk the metadata claim except insult the masses. The data may have been “computer generated” but it strains credulity that an attorney would try to claim the auto generation backdated the post. I think Baldoni is going to be a very rich man after this because even if they dispute the accuracy of the date, it’s going to be up to a jury to decide whether or not this is true.
Do you actually sleep, you undercover vampire?! 😂
😂
Spot on about Main Stream Media, don’t consume it anymore
What makes her a B list? I’ve always thought Blake Lively was a C list actress and Ryan B list. Ryan ain’t no Leo or Denzel 😂
Agree. I think Barbie may have edged him to A-List even though I hated that movie.
@@elizgraham2844I think you’re thinking of Ryan Gosling. I don’t think Ryan Reynolds was in Barbie
Ryan is Deadpool, foul mouthed, over animated tosser
“C” is a stretch too. Always thought she was bland.
@@ohheyitsdee89 The nice Ryan who is married to the lovely Ms. Mendes. I don't think anyone has a bad word to say about Ryan Gosling.
Shampoo company owner 😮😂 🤭....
It’s like bed night stories with Perez. I’m loving this unraveling style.
Yes. I was thinking he should be reading by candlelight with a cup of hot cocoa 😂
Dramatic reading indeed 😂 I'm here for it!
Thanks for your effort in keeping us updated with the truth!! You have my respects after what you did for the last 24hrs !!❤❤
LOSERS! This whole mess RR and BL started has me livid!!! Stay strong Justin!!! The World ....WORLD 🌎🌍🌏has your back!!!!!!
Pay attention to wording: NYT says they didn't yet have access to Blively's civil rights complaint. That's true because she hadn't yet filed it.
HOWEVER, they're not denying that Blively had approached them early to tell them what WOULD be submitted as a civil rights complaint.
I like the dramatic reading better, than my inner voice.
Thank God that eye watering Burger shirt is gone! 😂😅
Lol
After watching all your shorts yesterday, I’m so pleased to see that the hamburger shirt is gone!
Great updates Perez, I’m so invested!
The meta data embedded in the photos doesn't lie, unlike the NYT.
Just because they didn’t release it doesn’t mean they didn’t work on the story prior to. It is relevant. Let’s let the people decide, or juries decide what is relevant and not relevant.
You still got it Perez Hilton! I have been enjoying this case through you and it is nothing but entertaining! 🎉
100%. It’s almost like they have contempt for their viewers/readers. NYT (and Deadline) need to read the room.
I’m so glad you got some sleep and showered Perez. I was concerned about you. 🥺
The bullies have bitten off more than they could chew😂 TEAM JUSTIN😘🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
What do you mean google software? 😂😂😂 You mean google SEO bots? NYT is just like Snake Lie-ly. And why on "Google software" put those photots up on its own a week earlier than the complaint was signed? 😂
So why the NYT does not reveal when and where they got the info? And why they have not given Baldoni's camp a reasonable time for them give their side of the story? Their article was so bias.
YOU are killing this guy!
"plantation princess" ... I DIED!!!!
🤣😂🤣😂YOU ARE A TRIP PEREZ!! I guess I’ve been under a rock my whole life cuz I’ve never heard of you. Glad I stumbled on to your channel about week or 2 ago love your personality oh and btw I’m 62 years old 😂🤣
Legacy media is DEAD to me
Plantation Princess, I am screaming!!!!!!!! 😂😂😂 you did that Perez!
Or “Plantation Barbie”!!
Grab your dragons, wear your florals, we're going to defame someone tonight.
They’re full of it they act like we’re all idiots
RR's cancelled former misstress turned second wife is acting craaaazy
I don’t understand why google would generate a random date “earlier” it doesn’t make sense to me
Perez, gracias for all your posts. You did all the work so I could clean the kitchen while listening. Yes, you still have it!!!
"Shampoo company owner".....you're hilarious!! She's gone from B list actress to the owner of a shampoo company...too funny!!!
Naked truths aren't always pretty! Best line in the movie!
PereZ you remind me of the Cheshire Cat! You’re hilarious. Haha loving every minute of these updates.
The timing of their receipt of the info from BL’a team and when it was created and thus imbedded into their report vs their assertion that the date was due to google can easily be proven through a court ordered subpoena of ALL of their communications and files pertaining to the case, wouldn’t it?
It’ll be funny if Google claps back
F*ckn dead at Perez’s commentary. Love you Perez! This is giving me life right now
“Shampoo company owner” 😭😭😭😭
“Shampoo company owner”😂😂😂😂
You’re a chronic chronicler- love the fresh tee shirt!❤
The checkers and chess of it all🤣Love it