We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice
The implementation of prenuptial agreements stands out as the most effective legal tool to address these issues, as they clearly outline terms related to spousal maintenance and child support. Such agreements, in my professional view, could act as a robust safeguard against the misuse of legal provisions by individuals seeking undue advantage. In the present case, there appears to be evidence suggesting that the woman may have exploited the legal system to benefit her brother. While avoiding direct accusations, if these allegations are substantiated, they raise serious concerns about judicial impartiality. The fact that the presiding judge was located in the ex-wife's locality further fuels suspicions of potential bias or undue influence. The deceased suffered significant psychological distress, being forced to attend court hearings repeatedly, despite the ex-wife's apparent ability to support herself financially. While child support obligations are justifiable, imposing alimony in this case seems unwarranted. A prenuptial agreement could have effectively deterred such baseless claims, protecting the rights of the aggrieved party. From a pragmatic standpoint, the concept of dowry, though controversial, may have relevance in specific contexts. Reports suggest that the deceased earned an impressive ₹14 lakhs per month, an achievement requiring immense personal investment. Expecting acknowledgment of such an investment should not be deemed unreasonable. Financial considerations undeniably influence matrimonial alliances in our society. For instance, recent data reveals that 70% of male administrative officers in India have spouses who cease professional endeavors post-marriage, while 100% of female officers have partners who continue working. This disparity highlights a societal bias that evaluates a man's financial capacity as a prerequisite for marriage, a standard rarely applied to women. In this context, dowry might be viewed as a response to systemic imbalances, warranting legislative frameworks that ensure equity for all parties. Marriage in India is revered as a sacred institution, with women often held in high regard. However, during divorce proceedings, men are frequently vilified and dehumanized, with their families subjected to undue legal and social harassment. Families uninvolved in marital discord often become collateral damage in such situations. Marriage has, in some instances, devolved into a means for certain individuals to exploit men and their families financially. To address these injustices and uphold justice, the formalization of prenuptial agreements is crucial. Regarding the woman’s statement in the video that "not all women are gold diggers," it is essential for such claims to be backed by a thorough analysis of facts and figures. Numerous cases illustrate how financial security plays a critical role in marital decisions, whether in love or arranged marriages. For example, low-income laborers have supported their wives’ education only to later face false allegations and severe harassment, rendering their lives unbearable. On lawmaking, I acknowledge that women historically faced substantial harassment, necessitating stringent protective laws. However, lawmakers must now account for current data and evolving societal dynamics. This is not an argument to dismantle laws favoring women but rather to advocate for balanced legislation. For instance, introducing prenuptial agreements can protect men from false allegations. Furthermore, women who file baseless accusations that cause undue suffering should face legal consequences, including imprisonment proportional to the harm caused. This would create a fair and equitable legal framework that prevents the misuse of protective laws while ensuring justice for all.
Jo ladkiya ya aurate, men ko support nahi kar rahe hai ya unke khilaf aisa galat karr rahi hai, vo ye baat bhul rahi hai ki ye sab unke bhai ya bete ke sath bhi ho sakta hai.
Atul took a wrong step. because of him actual genuine cases where men are real culprit would come out strong. Atul was the victim and stupid blanket law against men should be revised. but every case should be handled based on available facts not because someone committed s-cide.
:hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving:sir my superchat is.misses mera quistion h aap acharya parshnat ji ke sath podcast kab kar rahe h:hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving: 0:12
for me islam which don't even recognise marital rape and domestic voilence only option for women is to go to court get divorce or or just ask because i say to muslim to say three words mein tumhe talaq deta hoon talaq deta hoon talaq deta hoon when she itself asks then it's a place of shame for men so give it immediately
We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice
Allah aapko Salamat rakhe Bhai 😊❤
Nice stream ...always loving someone like you who is side of democracy of this country... thanks akash ❤️ no left no right only democracy.. jaihind
We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice
नहीं मिलेगा। क्या उखाड़ लोगे।
@@satya5003😂😂😂😂
The implementation of prenuptial agreements stands out as the most effective legal tool to address these issues, as they clearly outline terms related to spousal maintenance and child support. Such agreements, in my professional view, could act as a robust safeguard against the misuse of legal provisions by individuals seeking undue advantage. In the present case, there appears to be evidence suggesting that the woman may have exploited the legal system to benefit her brother. While avoiding direct accusations, if these allegations are substantiated, they raise serious concerns about judicial impartiality. The fact that the presiding judge was located in the ex-wife's locality further fuels suspicions of potential bias or undue influence.
The deceased suffered significant psychological distress, being forced to attend court hearings repeatedly, despite the ex-wife's apparent ability to support herself financially. While child support obligations are justifiable, imposing alimony in this case seems unwarranted. A prenuptial agreement could have effectively deterred such baseless claims, protecting the rights of the aggrieved party.
From a pragmatic standpoint, the concept of dowry, though controversial, may have relevance in specific contexts. Reports suggest that the deceased earned an impressive ₹14 lakhs per month, an achievement requiring immense personal investment. Expecting acknowledgment of such an investment should not be deemed unreasonable. Financial considerations undeniably influence matrimonial alliances in our society. For instance, recent data reveals that 70% of male administrative officers in India have spouses who cease professional endeavors post-marriage, while 100% of female officers have partners who continue working. This disparity highlights a societal bias that evaluates a man's financial capacity as a prerequisite for marriage, a standard rarely applied to women. In this context, dowry might be viewed as a response to systemic imbalances, warranting legislative frameworks that ensure equity for all parties.
Marriage in India is revered as a sacred institution, with women often held in high regard. However, during divorce proceedings, men are frequently vilified and dehumanized, with their families subjected to undue legal and social harassment. Families uninvolved in marital discord often become collateral damage in such situations. Marriage has, in some instances, devolved into a means for certain individuals to exploit men and their families financially. To address these injustices and uphold justice, the formalization of prenuptial agreements is crucial.
Regarding the woman’s statement in the video that "not all women are gold diggers," it is essential for such claims to be backed by a thorough analysis of facts and figures. Numerous cases illustrate how financial security plays a critical role in marital decisions, whether in love or arranged marriages. For example, low-income laborers have supported their wives’ education only to later face false allegations and severe harassment, rendering their lives unbearable.
On lawmaking, I acknowledge that women historically faced substantial harassment, necessitating stringent protective laws. However, lawmakers must now account for current data and evolving societal dynamics. This is not an argument to dismantle laws favoring women but rather to advocate for balanced legislation. For instance, introducing prenuptial agreements can protect men from false allegations. Furthermore, women who file baseless accusations that cause undue suffering should face legal consequences, including imprisonment proportional to the harm caused. This would create a fair and equitable legal framework that prevents the misuse of protective laws while ensuring justice for all.
Watching you from t v you tube very good video god bless. You ..
The conclusion at last was best
Like your dare job. Good journalism man.
Proud of you bro👍👍🇮🇳🇮🇳🎉🎉🎉🎉
Jo ladkiya ya aurate, men ko support nahi kar rahe hai ya unke khilaf aisa galat karr rahi hai, vo ye baat bhul rahi hai ki ye sab unke bhai ya bete ke sath bhi ho sakta hai.
Justice milna chahiye bhai ko bahut Shareef nekdil banda tha
Very nice
Sir you're great
love from Bangladesh ❤❤
Hello sir, big fan of u
Allah bless you 😊❤
#justiceforatulshubhash
Hi sir 🙏💐💐
Hello bro Original Deshbhakt
Justice for Atul
I think we have to tock about case 69
:sir my superchat is.misses mera quistion h aap acharya parshnat ji ke sath podcast kab kar rahe ❤❤😊...
Justice for atul
Politics are really important for a country?
रिश्वतखोरी का बिजनेस चलते रहना चाहिए। बाकी सब जाए कुएं में।
Sir aap ke har episode dekh ta hu
Hum kuchh nhi jaante : hum modi modi : hindu hindu karenge 🤧
Atul took a wrong step. because of him actual genuine cases where men are real culprit would come out strong. Atul was the victim and stupid blanket law against men should be revised. but every case should be handled based on available facts not because someone committed s-cide.
Ok
I love sir
आपके कॉमेंट्स करने से अगर देश में कुछ दवाईमत सकती है तो मेरा एक सिंपलक्वेश्चन है कांग्रेस evm पर सवाल क्यों नहीं पूछता
India me kuch change is nhi hai brother.....jha pe mp pseudoscience ko promot kre....wha ka development changa si kese ho skta h...
Sab kuch changa c
:hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving:sir my superchat is.misses mera quistion h aap acharya parshnat ji ke sath podcast kab kar rahe h:hand-pink-waving::hand-pink-waving: 0:12
Hiii
Case 69
Sab kuch change si
Yo
Ma kasam jisne Comment ko like nahi Kiya Wo pakka exam ma fail ho Gaya 😂😂
Abe anpadh, Abe bewakoof! Padhai krle, ye comment pr likes batorne se kuch nhi hone wala hai tera
for me islam which don't even recognise marital rape and domestic voilence only option for women is to go to court get divorce or or just ask because i say to muslim to say three words mein tumhe talaq deta hoon talaq deta hoon talaq deta hoon
when she itself asks then it's a place of shame for men so give it immediately
AKASH BHAI MODIYABIND
We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice We want justice
Sir aap ke har episode dekh ta hu