We thought THIS was the WORST Battlefield..
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 мар 2022
- Battlefield V now has more average max players than Battlefield 2042 on Steam. What happened? Is Battlefield 5 any better?
Most clips from my livestream: / stodeh
Jackfrags visibility video: • Battlefield 5 How bad ...
DannyOnPC BF5 Cheater Comp: • Spectating cheaters in...
Original invisible player post by u/zepistol
How to Snipe in 2042: • Don't make these Mista...
Best 2042 Settings: • Battlefield 2042 Best ...
Fast levelling in 2042: • This Class Setup makes...
Powered by GFUEL energy, use code STOD for 10-30% off: gfuel.ly/3eplyUd
Want a MAX Performance gaming PC? Check out PCSpecialist: pcspeciali.st/stodeh
🐦Twitter: / stodehtv
📷Instagram: / stodeh
Join my discord community!: / discord
Facebook: / stodeh
Stodeh's Keyboard US: amzn.to/2RDH0cQ
UK:amzn.to/37FjiCm
Stodeh's Headphones US: amzn.to/2tanrPV
UK: amzn.to/2RGAxhn
Stodeh's Mouse US: amzn.to/3aSu5v5
UK: amzn.to/2SdlhHR
This channel is all about snipers, sniping and FPS shooters! I mainly do Battlefield 2042 Sniping but I also play Call of Duty, Battlefront and I love Battle Royale. I often play solos, duos and squads on my livestream. I have 1000 hours experience in every Battlefield and I hope to play more FPS games in 2021. I hope you enjoy my 2042 sniper gameplay as much as I do making it. 
Игры
Players: "BF5 is the worst Battlefield ever made!"
Dice: "No. BF5 is the worst Battlefield made so far."
this still wasn’t true then lol
@Dylan i feel like the only way they could make a worse game than 2042 is to just top making games
Why didn't anyone go back to battlefield 1?
@@lt.lettuce2023 I can think about a few reasons:
- BF1 is just older and some people really do have prejudice towards older games dispite how good those older games may be.
- A lot of players prefer fps games with a more "modern" thematic. Both have "old themes" but in the players minds WW2 > WW1, probably.
- People now have the understanding that dispite the fact that BF5's release and first months (or year) had been shite near the end of it's life cicle the game got some good updates.
Dice - Dont be sad . This is how things happens sometimes.
We need to get new content on BFV. Imagine the battle of the bulge, Stalingrad, operation Barbarossa, all with BF music and ambience. It would be crazy.
Won’t happen. Dice won’t even fix 2042 in time.
Stalingrad: Comrade! Fight your way out of the Encirclement!
Yeah but gamers ran it into the ground so now you gotta live with the little content it has. You all decided to jump on the hate train and this is what you get
BFV is trash… 2042 is just soo bad that even BFV looks like a great BF…
@@FacTzZiiq then don’t play them. Easy enough. There’s no need to repeat what thousands have already said
I've been saying it since this game was canned, this is mechanically a GREAT Battlefield game.
As bad as everything was in the games life cycle, the absolute worst thing they could've done was cancel it.
It was on the path of true greatness with the Eastern Front.
Yep
Imagine Stalingrad!
@@korkunge it would have been glorious. And then they add that stupid scout grenade launcher that's literally the rear half of a Mosin. Such a slap in the face imo
totally agree
Saddest part is that there were soviet files in BFV, can’t believe they stopped bfv’s content for shitty 2042…what a huge waste
Let me add that I wasn’t really impressed until the pacific launch. That changed it for me greatly
They found their stride there and then, nada. What a shame we never got the Eastern Front etc
I skipped the week at school when launched. I was like this is it, they finally understood what we want. But I was wrong, week after, they messed the game with the new ttk and turned all the weapons into peanut shotters. For nothing.
Same, the pacific expansion really did it for me.
Same. It felt like they nailed it with the Pacific update then they pulled the plug on it 🤷♂️
@@vitezslavslavik6662 ttk got rolled back.... eventually
Gotta say, I loved BFV! Hilarious that it’s more popular than 2042!
Agree.
HALLO?! SANITAETER?!
Yep. Same
I loved it from the start. Nothing really was game breaking other than the revive loop but that was patched quickly. I didn't get annoyed about the stupid trailer but the devs saying "if you don't like it, don't buy it" was annoying.
But after bfv, it told me not to pre order, and to wait a bit of time after release. Still haven't bought 2042 and most likely won't.
Bf5 is awesome, we've gone backwards with 2042.
Loved the gunplay in BFV, a real improvement, had a slow start but after the Pacific update, i was finally looking forward to the future.
Dice had hinted at D-Day, the eastern front and more european stuff... i was really devastated to see DICE pull the plug for both BFV and Battlefront 2, but that just meant more hands to work on the next BF title... what could go wrong?
Too true that you had my feeling hurt again... Shiet how I wish it was never cancelled🤬
BF5's prone mechanic is the most underrated in FPS games, hands down. It needs to be a standard mechanic in every FPS game IMO.
2042 actually makes BF5 look like a masterpiece. I hated BF5 for so long, but eventually i grew to enjoy it, and after the pacific update i actually loved it... Switching from 2042 and playing a game of BF5 is such a massive difference . The gunplay and maps feel amazing (the 50+ FPS boost also helps). in just a few minutes of switching from 2042 to BF5 there is no way i can ever play another game of 2042.. its just so bad.
Broo I remember when the pacific launched it looked so good and it was sooo fun
@West Coast nothing wrong with that lower u keep ur standards more satisfied u will be
@West Coast So is Dice's, considering what they gave us.
Though not implemented the best way I really liked the concept of fortifications being able to build cover and flanking routes, supply stations for utility and ambushes but they're not in 2042 so either the community didn't agree with me or dice doesn't care
To be honest, Bf V was my first BF game, and I started playing on the pacific release (I played only the beta before) and I just loved it, I'm not one to care too much about ambiance and environment, and so it wasn't a problem to me, gameplay was perfect.
Afterwards I just slayed the game with like 1.5k hours (which is a lot for me, most other played game was pubg with 400 hours).
It's just a joy gameplay wise and I think that's why it's running this good atm compared to 2042
And there probably even worse no lives than me
Bf1 was awesome
I find BF1 feels a bit janky controls wise after BFV, and the guns are very underwhelming. Still fun and looks fantastic, just never feels smooth to me.
@Rob Haddock its supposed to feel weighty and grounded, you're not a supersoldier. Have you played bf4?
@@robhaddock2034 ^
What pissed me off so much about 2042. Is that dice had this line up of games that succeeded in a big part of the game and did ok in the other parts. Bf4 has the best sandbox, with bad movement, and no one even knew battlefield would be better with an atmosphere, bf1 had the greatest atmosphere ever, and bf5 had the best movement. But 2042 had none of these amazing qualities combined.
And there was BF3 that didn't excel at any of those but was really good at all of em (especially compared to shooters at the time). And it had the best maps and game modes. BF3 will always be my fav
yep, every bf game does some things better, but then does the things it did better in past games worse lol. they need to make a bf game that just adds all the best parts of bf combined. is that too much to ask?
the atmosphere on iwo jima rush was fantastic. charging up the mountain on the last point with explosions raining around you was such an experience
BFV is so good! The vehicle combat with the attrition system was a great balance, the building mechanics to help reinforce or rebuild destroyed areas, and the visuals of every environment are filled with details in every corner. It had a rough lunch and suffered from a similar "what direction do we go" that 2042 has now BUT when Pacific launched, the game was truly at its peak. There is an argument TTK 2.0 wasn't a bad idea, it just wasn't the time or game to do it. Maybe a community test environment trial and have it be something they developed for future titles, but it was the last rug pulled out from a lot of players, after a long year of bugs (challenges no tracking, invisible players, god-tier weapons, weird random jank) that pushed people out.
Oh now you (people) acknowledge that? I been saying bfv is a good game from the jump, the only issue was the lack of content.
@@Gurr-jm6ed A good game doesn't have lack of content, the game at the begining was crap, and the story still kinda is, plus it's hardly a ww2 game with so few factions.
I hate the attrition system. It is just anti-fun for all for me. As one of the best tankers on the NA servers, the vehicle balance is just awful. I can simply cheese the game with vehicle upgrades: the HEAT rounds at the final tiers of heavy tank can outright one hit medium and light tanks on top of having their own additional ammunition pool. Hull machineguns have infinite ammunition on top of zero recoil or spread, a single friend can turn your tank into an unstoppable killing machine that never needs to rearm. Against highly optimized tank builds by skilled players stock or alternate tank builds never stand a chance. They have to rearm more often, hit half as hard on top of often being less durable. The AA tanks are just weird, with some factions being way more effective. The armored cars and AA tanks are basically a detriment to the team when picked because they can’t hold their own against enemy tanks, that’s just bad game design. At least in BF1 the light tank and AA trucks aren’t completely helpless against enemy armor, unlike greyhounds which can get one hit by medium tanks and AA tanks which they nerfed to no longer deal chip damage to enemy tanks.
I don’t fly but people really complained about planes. Planes can resupply much faster than ground vehicles, leading bombers to just dominate matches with a rain of bombs that can outright flatten some objectives. Fjell mountaintops are the worst when the enemy runs multiple bombers on cramped mountain passes and shitty AA gun emplacements.
There isn't the common sense in its game design to call it balanced
Honestly I really enjoyed this game. Yes we have less people who play in South Africa so it's hard to get lobbies with reasonable ms like 32ms so I'm always forced to play in EU servers with about 170 to 200ms but I still enjoy it. I can hit my shots and I don't face any hit reg issues like I do in BF1. I've never played 2042 but I can say that BF5 is very enjoyable.
Are you blqck?
@@myhonorwasloyalty yeah bro
holy crap 170ms
@@farianandadiratama yep. People in SA play Warzone and CSGO mostly so it's almost impossible to find SA lobbies at 32ms. It's always EU servers. At least in BF5 my shots do hit though than in BF1 when I just spend the entire conquest getting killed and my bullets going through the enemy.
I've been thinking about getting it, but I keep reading reviews that say it's infested with hackers
Personally, I followed BFV from launch and experienced every single problem you mentioned in this video, but I actually enjoyed the game and I still do. A huge downside that I really cant forget is Firestorm. We would have been having the time of our lives in this perfect ww2 br experience but they put behind a pay wall and didnt really care about it that much. Overall BFV was, is and will be a game that I meme with my friends on the battlefield and I'm thankful for the great moments.
If they just cancelled Firestorm they probably would’ve had time to do the Eastern front as well as D day
@@ankitbhasi7794 Firestorm failed the same way Blackout failed. Both behind a $60+ paywall. Until Warzone was free, it blew up. Firestorm was an okay BR for Battlefield, but WW2 ain't my type of thing for a BR game. Would have much preferred a modern or semi-future BR and it being free
I personally think that the Iwo Jima breakthrough experience is one of the best experiences in any battlefield game. It can get very tense and fighting over the last sector is great chaos. The beach landings are great and every sector feels balanced except maybe the caves lol. Yes a good Japanese pilot can really imbalance the lobby on occasion but there are plenty of counters in place such as the AA and fliegerfaust.
I think the movement and gunplay is top notch in its current state and I think the vehicles are fairly balanced. Tanks and planes are powerful but they can be easily taken out if you put in a bit of effort. I wish they stayed a little more true to their vision with the attrition system because now you spawn with 200 bullets, and I kind of enjoyed that part of game when you only had a few bullets left or were on low hp and you felt like you had to make a final stand. Also rewarded team play and working with other players to take an objective. I also loved the idea of fortifications and I wish they explored this further then just doing sandbags mostly. The only big ick for me were the elite soldiers skins, especially when you see German soldiers in the pacific theater. Amazing game and I still play it today
100%. Has great music too, especially when the game is reaching it's climax. That adds to the experience.
Couldn’t agree more!!
I love it and fighting the last sector up the hill with your brothers and sisters in arms OMGGG its crazy fun and exciting!
Great recap I really enjoyed this video. BFV was my first Battlefield and loved it. I couldn’t understand the hate at the time but now realise why it frustrated BF veterans. I really wish they’d given it an extra years support. So much potential.
In comparison to 2042 the movement, gunplay and fortifications are all far superior. On console V still feels the newer game.
I grinded the hell out of BF5. Even through their bad TTK-decisions and the lack of anticheat. What kept bringing me back was the gunplay, movement and such. When you got in a squad that worked together and communicated or played with friends as a squad (and got a little sweaty with it) you could get some AMAZING BF-moments. One that I still remember is me and a buddy defending A-point on Arras breakthrough against half the enemy team with just us two and two other guys holding another position. Or (also on Arras) joining a game on the second to last sector with the defending team getting annihilated and just squeezing out a win as our squad spawned in and proceeded to cut through the attackers and steal a tank. Those are the moments you play BF for.
Let's also not forget the sniping...a squad of skilled snipers, a medic using the ranged boltaction rifle could be a LOT of fun too.
I did too and a lot of people give me shit for choosing BFV over BF1. I only played BF1 for like a month and stopped playing because I just didn’t feel it. Something about BFV made me grind the shit out of it and I haven’t done that since BO3 or maybe BF3
@@mokokoco4720 the promblem with one is the core game play. You can have all the content you want and atmosphere you want but if I enjoy the look and sound of the game more than I actuallly enjoy playing it, than I'd just watch a movie or someone else play it.
I still continue to play this game constantly and consistently. The game never gets old, Mechanics, music, and maps are just outstanding! Scenery is so majestical and realistic, I appreciate that the most.
I really enjoyed BFV and could never figure out why it was it was hated so much. It has great graphics,gameplay and huge maps (especially the Pacific maps) and an amazing soundtrack.
@@Jschaefer04 I think people hated on it because it wasn’t accurate or something, like the characters. So much beauty in the game though. I’m actually gonna play today lol
@@ryanhanson937 main point where the agenda disaster resulting in bending history in what they wanted and insulting the players for criticising them.., with I fully agree with the players.
I got it for free so for what it is its a good game now (like Battlefront 2 now), text chat filter for simple words, bugs, balance weapon problems, real money credit system(which is still a big problem) and liveservice came also onto this mess. Firestorm where promoted with as main feature that came way too late (for the bAtTlE RoYal hype train anyways), also that mode was very broken if I remember correct.
But no where near bf1 feeling from the dark scenery, specific famous battles..flags..sadly for me.
I'm also with a friend the only one that actually played bfv for longer, all others (20+ players) stayed, if, with bf1 after a playing it by release . I miss unlocking everything by playing and not have to pay horrendous sums of real money credits for some skin, jacket or tank camo to blend in..🤢
@@ryanhanson937 also remember the trailer with the claw prostethic arm people and colorful make up all over the place, they heavy nerfed all these and kicked some out
@@g.koch. well said, I absolutely agree with you. You’re right. BF1 is by far the best when it comes down to game mechanics and how it operates as a whole. I do think it’s pretty simple to unlock weapons, skins etc. But yes, there are a lot of things you can only get if you pay, which is a bummer since I don’t pay to play. But yea it has its ups and downs, but still a beautiful game. And yea, they could have made something out of the fire storm, but they didn’t manage and made the right decisions with that. Could have been something good. Once again, well said.
I just hope that EA doesn't take away "OH WELL PEOPLE WANT MORE WW2" instead of "People want a solid shooter".
Personally I enjoy the ammo and medical supply stations on on the points as well as the vehicle resupply stations. It made the game feel more realistic in how they repaired/ got ammo and such.
I was so sad to see they didn’t bring back the reinforcement system with building wasn’t the most useful thing but damn did it feel cool building sandbag wall fortresses and holding down objectives
Considering how flat and open 2042's maps are, fortifications would've been really handy but nope! No cover for you!
I really loved BFV tbh, I played it near the end when all content was out and got the game for free. The best part of it is the customization of clothing. I loved changing my uniform to fit the map and can easily blend in and maybe get a half a second advantage due to my clothing. Which really did a lot.
Really loved the movement of BF5. When I came back to play BF3 or BF4 man the movement felt clunky even though I played these games for years xD. It was kinda hard to play past Battlefields but the nostalgia is really stronger.
Im 37, BFV was basically my first Battlefield that I put in significant time. I absolutely loved the gunplay and movement. I was happy it was WW2 but didnt feel like the traditional WW2 shooter. Rotterdam and Arras were Gems to me.. Also, sniping felt so good. The TTK update was the worst update Ive seen a developer make to a game. I have gone back and played BF1 after playing BFV. Yes the atmosphere is nice. but the gunplay feels clunky and not as smooth. Overall loved the game. Even the time consuming assignments that made you get headshots while standing in an objective area. Also, Im one of the rare ppl that actually didnt enjoy the pacific maps.
Feel like I’m looking into a mirror reading this. Agree with every word.
I'm staying for the glorious sniper kills you always manage to get no matter the game! Not to mention you have awesome video formatting/writing :)
Generally, I think the 20th century is the right place for Battlefield, and that going to the future means the developers have too much scope to do stuff. Battlefield One forced the developers meanwhile to make a constrained WWI experience as interesting as possible. Therefore, I think it’d be interesting to focus on the Interwar crisis period. You can justify including WWI and some WWII weapons, and you can go to interesting new environments. Poland, Hungary, Finland, Ireland, China and Iraq could be interesting places to hold battles and provide a lot of variety
I was really excited about BF V as I was craving a next-gen successor to BF 1942. When I found they were ending support prematurely after finally making the game good, I was very upset. I wishfully was hoping the next game would flop. I did not expect it to actually come true...lol
Really good analysis! BFV did have some good developments. It's a shame it didn't get the love it needed to thrive (firestrom f2p, more stable and consistent development, better showcase of gameplay/flow in its early days). Pacific was a banger of an update; if that level of care was kept up without the mad balances, imagine what could have been! It's a shame 2042 went down the same path but even further and worse. Great content Stod! 🤘🏻
Yeah first they should've kept the different modes. The game got boring just playing either conquest or breakthrough. I had some of the best games on frontlines or domination
Got into BF cause of 5, started in 2018. Fucking loved the game, the immersion and battles with friends I met along the way. I was never a fan of conquest so I enjoyed playing breakthrough; it felt like a genuine battlefield experience. All I was waiting for was the Eastern Front, and had my hopes up extremely high with the release of the Pacific and leaked files of plans for upcoming seasons. Unfortunately they ended support and turned to create an unplayable game. I sincerely hope that they think of going back to continue the live service to BFV as it could bring in extreme revenue and player-base back into the franchise. If not they will default. We will have to see though with the Summer update, although I will stand skeptical.
BFV is my favorite BF game followed by BF3. At the end the gunplay, movement mechanics, attrition, and fortifications felt really solid and I wished they just carried that over to 2042. Also I prefer NOT having auto health regen after BFV. Auto health regen feels cheap, casual, and too easy after playing BFV.
BFV is the best one.
And spotting. No one wants that noob shit.
@@leolionroarrrrrrr5509 no
5:45, the tomphson at launch was a beast with rapid fire and 20 bullet mag, it had 0 recoil/spread when hip firing and was great sniping people.
That being said, it took a few games to unlock all this.
Really interesting, like the insights and analysis, thanks Stod. Must take you ages to write down your thoughts for these! Cheers
I came back to this game after all this was finished. BF5 is my absolute favorite BF game. It does so many things very well, maybe not the best, but everything comes together so well.
Regarding your point on the anti cheat being "effective" on bf 2042, supposedly the cheat devs said that because of how badly the game runs and the super low player count it was not worth it for them to create and maintain the cheats, hence stopped and offered the people who bought them cheaper prices for cheats on other games 😂
No way they said that😂😂
@@titaniumwolf8756 yeah lm not kidding look it up
@@TaimatCR that…thats fucking hilarious!!! Even cheaters don’t want to touch 2042!!!
@@titaniumwolf8756 yeap
Hello long term battlefield fan here. Battlefield 1 was may favorite battlefield and I was exited when I heard that the next battlefield would be ww2 because I thought dice would continue the authentic feel of battlefield 1 into a world war 2 setting. But then I was heavily let down by the trailers and the controversy surrounding the game around that period.
Soon I moved passed the initial controversy and started to like the game because it actually had genuine improvements over battlefield 1 like graphics, movement and gunplay. After the Pacific update I actually had hopes that with a few more major updates the game could redeem itself and become a great game after all. But then in summer 2020 the developers basically gave up on the game and wasted all it's potential, leaving me utterly disappointed once again. I still to this day think dice should at least have given battlefield 5 one more major update before moving on to 2042.
The best thing that dice could have done was to make battlefield 5 a traditional, AUTHENTIC WW2 game that focus on the best known battles of world war 2 and not the nich ones. The pacific front should have been a part of the BASE GAME on release, even if that meant the game got pushed back into releasing in 2019 instead of 2018, and the first major update should have been the soviets and eastern front, the second D-DAY and so on. This game had so much potential if it was just made as a generic, traditional world war 2 shooter as a follow up to battlefield 1 but dice really just had to mess it up. I really hope someone can relate to my feelings.
You're king to HS with sniper. Sens on BFV? Using smooth or 133% advanced aiming feature?
You forgot to mention that BFV is "WW2" game without the Eastern Front, but you can play a fantasy battle of Rotterdam where Japanese girls paradrop into the city from an American C-47 plane with Tiger tanks, golden post-war French weapons alongside ghillie suit Germans with dragon face paint.
Dude, sounds like your just a *BigOt*
i can't really compare them. bf2042 may be out a little while, yet nothing has happened aside from some minor balance/performance updates. so its future is pretty much unknown. what bf5 did really outstanding was being able to shot thrown grenades/throwing them back (although i do not like that the timer gets magicly reset). every core mechanic in bf2042 feels like a downgrade: movement like bf3 with supersprint from cod warzone. shooting like no other bf before it (haven't played hardline so i don't know if its comparable). visuals like bf bc2 (without the destruction), soapy tires on all tired vehicles. i want to say i like the wingsuit but i think it's just a cope since it would be impossible to play the game without it. so that narrows down my operator choice to 1 and done. honestly i think i could do without bf2042. i do not see where they could take it (with reasonable effort) that i would like it. i have played on partially empty servers before but this one really knows how to make you feel alone and meaningless to the result of the battle.
The shooting in Hardline was like BF4 they didn't switch up the mechanics on that one . BF Hardline was a less polished and reskinned version of BF4 basically .
Stodeh - Bravo bro, absolutely top notch, epic quality video, from top to bottom... beginning to end. Give us more of this, please!
Gotta love BF5! I would argue that it has amongst the very best large scale team play ever offered in a FPS. If you're willing to adapt, you can literally will your team to victory by filling vital team roles other than kill-kill-kill-die-repeat. Repairing vehicles, transporting troops, laying down smoke screens, running medic, resupplyling snipers, and so on. The variety of ways to play is freakin' awesome!
Such a shame about BF2042, the formula for a GREAT game is literally at their fingertips. To get it so wrong almost feels intentional. How in the world did they miss the mark so badly?!
Good video. You should have expanded on the TTK changes, particularly the 2nd one in Christmas 2019. That was what made many, many players turn away from BF5 for good. DICE doubled down on the change claiming that it was to help newer players stay alive longer & not have them quit the game out of frustration. I believe they stood firm for a month or two if memory serves correct and even when they changed it back, it wasn't a complete revert.
A particularly sad period of public relations from DICE, mocking fans, telling us not to buy the game if we didn't like the direction of the game etc. There were good parts to this entry in the franchise like the mostly solid gunplay & smoother movement but way too many negatives. I stopped playing after the 2nd TTK change & even the Pacific didn't bring me back.
I truly believed that dice doesn’t know what their doing anymore. Theirs been so many deeply flawed design choices in the last few games. The last 5 games they’ve made feel heavily restricted on what you can do despite being sandbox style big battle shooters. BF1 and SWBF1 are better than their predecessors. Bf4 was their last great game and it’s slowly gotten worse since then.
They don't know what they are doing because most of them was replace by a new guys/girls. Old devs already left after Bf1 and Bf5 and regroup at a brand new studio.
The clips throughout this were insane. This was around the time I found Stods channel. Then went back and watched all the precious bf title videos. I loved BFV man. I’ll say it again theyre better off starting up bfv live service and making firestorm free then touching 2042
BF5 did a lot right. Movement. Gunplay, overall balance, lots of good maps like Arras, Rotterdam, Devastation. The medi packs you could take with you. Etc.
I have never touched firestorm.
Last year, I played BF5 with my sister (first-timer). We were struggling on a match and we're about to lose, so far away from winning. Then, the whole lobby started to use medic class. We lose tho, but that one area covered with big smoke 'cause tons of smoke grenade was used to help others. That's the best experience ever we had in BF5
I actually quit because of the second TTK change.
It was the principle of the thing, they told us they understood we didn't want the change and said they wouldn't do it.
Only to turn around and do it anyway.
Dont forget they actually made the looting in Firestorm better and then some random later patch reverted it, I dont think it ever got sorted again.
I’m still trying to get the mastery challenge V done for the MAB 38. 7 kills in one life over 30m is brutal with that smg.
People will never get satisfied. You like it, just enjoy it, hell what others think.
I actually enjoyed BF5 since playing the beta for the first time. I absolutely loved BF1 and was hungry for more historical combat like that. While BF5 was lacking in the historical aspect. I still enjoyed the game for it's tight gameplay and great battlefield moments.
Been watching Stodeh for years and years, imagine my surprise at 6:26 ... Love your channel man! Keep up the good content!
Always nice when stodeh uploads😁🙏🏽
Pacific DLC was the only good moment to remember for me, when they released the trailer, the hype was overload back then, and the content was a BANGER, sadly, nothing else was worth it apart from that (Content perspective)
One thing I never understood was how people complained about the TTK changes. The horrible visibility in the game, in addition to the super low initial ttk, made camping and sitting in hard to spot corners the most effective way to play the game. I recall so many instances of dying before even being able to identify where I was getting shot from. It was an awful compounding effect and once they made the TTK more like BF1's, that issue almost went away completely. While the changes did ruin some guns, I'd say made an overall net positive since it allowed for more playstyles to be effective and you could actually outplay people sitting in corners. Super low ttks work in games like CS, Valorant, and Siege since the whole game is designed around being tactical and having careful positioning. In a game like Battlefield, that can be super chaotic and unpredictable, I think a medium ttk suits the game best to account for that randomness, while also not making the game rely too much on teamwork such as higher ttk games like Overwatch, Apex, and Halo.
So glad you bring this up, I know I'm not the only 1 who loved bfv. I held a grudge against many content creators for posting how bad it supposedly was. Now we find those same people jumping back in and enjoying it.
Lots of great content at BFV launch. Loved how soldiers were more difficult spot, much more realistic.
1000h+ in bfv player : This is the worst bf i've ever played .
Great video Stods. I got into BFV as lock down kicked in. For that reason I have a completely perception of this game to most fans. I paid £13 for a game full of content, very few game breaking bugs and visuals and sound that absolutely blew me away as someone who had been playing COD since forever. Experiencing the final update with 2 infantry focused maps was just the cherry on top. Funny but It was because of my experience as late comer on BFV that I had such high expectations for 2042. The disappointment is immeasurable. A downgrade in EVERY department. Such a shame!
Just an example for why I think the game flopped, when wake island came out in that season battlepass there was the lunge mine gadget. When earned it was unuseable however like not able to equip. Then it was removed until a later date, I distinctly remember both my friend and I being confused and upset an analogy for the whole game tbh.
I am disappointed that they did not finish BFV to the end, it had the potential to be the best ww2 game so far, but it lacks content, shame that they invested time in making bf 2042 which is horrible instead to complete bfv
4:45, that's a crispy headshot. 👏🤣
I enjoyed BFV since launch. I'm in the Army and a paratrooper. When I first played grand operations , you had to jump in as the attacking element. Yeah, that had me hyped.
The back proning alone ruined player recognision so much. Players got a completely different shape than you expect, they could hide their heads in corners while bipoding MMGs on their legs which absorbed bullets at lower damage, all while being completely camoflaged by overexaggerated shadows and pixelated textures that blended together at 10m or more. Fuck that. In BF1 you could see someone running in the open hundreds of meters away. BFV rarely even had that kind of engagement ranges without thick vegetations or the horrible mirrage effect on the desert maps. They also liked putting grass that hid prone players on every map along with pitch black shadows on every little rock on the ground.
2042's weirdest decision is there's no player only areas where you're relatively safe from vehicles.
can you imagine a map with ultra dense city high-rises with a few accessible floors and rooftops either side like that flooded map from 4 but bigger and better(I forgot the name forgive me) and then on the edges a massive highway with loads of trashed cars to hide behind but enough space for tanks to fight it out.
Battlefield 5 could never solve the cheating and team balance problem. The lack of content is ultimately what killed it.
The BF V redeemed itself on that pacific update then *poof* gone, reduced to atoms. They're already going in the right direction. I was even expecting that this is going to be like Battlefront 2 tbh, but no,just after a few months they just announced that it will be their last update. It was heartbreaking.
It would’ve been, if they stuck to it sad.
Great breakdown. You NEED to do a similar video for BF4/BF1
Bf 5 was an absolute masterpiece in comparison to 2042, not even kidding. The Pacific expansion was a great addition but they had to screw it up with the ttk to apease to the casuals..
Loved the gunplay when they were not messing around with ttk and the ost. It was in the same line as bf1's ost that was incredible too
This is my favorite Battlefield game. I'm a 35 year old gamer who's played since Battlefield 1942, and this title is the most solid, the most polished, and feels the best to play, in my opinion. Oh, and it has far and away the best soundtrack in modern first person shooters.
Played some games last night and had some peak battlefield moments winning the game 1-0 is the most intense feeling and the cheering once the victory screen faded in was just 👌👌
I was really hoping for a Battle of Kursk map. Or really the Eastern front in general with so many iconic battles to be shown
Great content!
I don't know what they were thinking when on launch they capped your level to 50. Everyone was level 50 in a matter of weeks. This is what made BF4 fun, working your way to level 140 took hundreds of hours.
These clips are outrageous. The sniping clips are mad. Barely looks before taking shots one after the other line sniping through smoke
Only bought BF5 after 2042 released as an anti-foot soldier vehicle swarming unatmospheric skeletal disaster, so my first look at BF5 was in it's end state. I really enjoy it the game, the maps are far superior to 2042, the guns are fun, and love the melee variety :) The squad-play is great, you literally get rewards for working together. The only thing that has completely ruined my BF5 experience are the hackers. They don't even hide it. Why would they, there's nothing to stop them. My personal "favourite" was a speed hack that allowed him to move on foot at around 10x speed, and wiped our teams foot soldiers with a katana. His name was something like SpeedBunny.
After playing each night for a month, the two matches I had without a hacker were awesome.
I tried playing BF1 yesterday and all servers were empty. Was that a bug or is the game dead?
For me what bf5 did right was the sniping mechanics and the added bullet velocity which was added later in game instead of at launch. This greatly improved sniping as a whole like previous bf titles and satisfied my sniping inch as a sniping main as I've been in all previous bf titles.
Love your take on all this, Stod. GG
One of the worst things in the recent BF games are the stupid assignments that need you to do very unusual things and you could only track 4 at a time (how was it almost a decade earlier possible to track every assignment at the same time??). For example you need to kill 20 people lying down in order to get some gold parts on your sniper, which is the stupidest playstylefor a sniper in a BF game.
Great narrative. I love, and still do, BFV. It was my first intro in to the BF franchise. The game play was great. Charging about tank busting. Sniping. Hot and sweaty medic revs. My take away from this video is I need to be patient with Dice to make 2042 in to the game we want. I have to have faith it’ll get there.
I didn't really like it until the Pacific update. Then I was playing it non-stop for a while. Then they messed with TTK and cheaters became rampant again and I just put it down. Haven't really played it since.
For me, sniping in battlefield peaked in BF1. The sweet spot mechanic rewarded good positioning, for other ranges they still did good damage and the handling felt realistic and smooth.
BF5s snipers were dissapointing. They still felt good to use, but without the sweet spot I struggled to give enemies anything more than hitmarkers before they got into cover, and more often than not I was outclassed by assault rifles on all ranges where I could reliably hit them.
The pacific update was the only time it felt like a ww2 game… EA is killing this franchise by trying to be like other games. They don’t seem to understand that people liked battlefield because it wasn’t like other games.
Oh and 2042’s love letter is still M.I.A.
Bro I was playing high asf earlier and BFV has just finished downloading from earlier so I decided to play Norway campaign and It was such an amazing gameplay I don’t know if it’s because I’m on the series x but the graphics looked beautiful and it just felt like a battlefield game/campaign all around
Always loved BF5. Still playing.. very happy to see some rounds full of gamers. 👍🏻👍🏻
"Supposed to add a dragging mechanic"
Battlebit...
Very good vid stod :)
BF4 a nearly 10 yr old game currently has more players than 2042.
We could’ve had great maps about the eastern front and operation market garden would’ve been a pretty cool one to could’ve map a view maps out of that
Imma just say it. Bf5 was brave in it's mechanics and most paid off for me. Biggest is the removal of 3d spotting. I really like how it wasn't "Shoot the Doritos" anymore and we need recons to...you know, RECON.
I played BFV since the beta. I always though that people gave it too much shit when it first came out, I always enjoyed it. I don't really remember the first TTK change all too much, but I do remember not caring about the changes it introduced as it made the TTK more similar to BF1 (Which happens to be my favorite BF). I do remember the second TTK change though, the one that made the FG 42 useless. That change pissed me off because I am a support main and it felt as though that class was hit the hardest, also the FG 42 was my go to gun so salt in the wound right there. At that point I went back to BF1 until the TTK was reverted.
You hit the nail on the head.
No need for an alt-WWII. Just wanted an authentic experience. I don’t understand the focus on things like skins and appearances, I’d much rather have that development spent onto different weapons and vehicles.
BFV is still vastly more fun to play than 2042.
Pacific maps were a huge addition. Never get tired of em. Only major thing missing in BFV is the complete lack of naval combat like in the dlc for BF4
When defensive play is taking on as the meta I think they should offer different XP values based on the weapon being used and if the player is moving. If someone is laying around sniping maybe they could get half the XP per kill and the players using faster paced weapons and moving would get an XP increase per kill. That would encourage people to play at a faster pace....cause we all love our XP.
I loved the tanks, silly overpowered but still venerable due to slow acceleration/speed and the anti vehicle weapons along with limited repair and ammo.
Also the movement improvements like dropping and grappling a ledge below, rolling out of drops and sliding.
The game should have continued with adding the Russian conflict against Germany and possibly Japan.
I've got to admit I sometimes jump on this game when I want a break from hell let loose and I still enjoy it. Stod great game play as always dude 🤘🤘🤘🤘
I despised the lack of cover in BF5. It seemed like every map was sprawling and all of the capture points overlooked each other with no cover in between. So half the match was just trying to push through "no man's land" while the entire enemy team was just waiting for someone to run in to their sights. Hated that game, and I was a loyal battlefield guy from Bad Company onward. Don't even get me started on the progression system and how convoluted all of the features were unless you learned about them all from a youtube video or something. The game felt foreign to me.
My worst things in BF5:
1. No Anticheat
2. faster paced
3. too fast TTD
4. the maps
I have pretty mixed feelings about Bfv but neither do I downright hate it or absolutely love it. It was definitely a good game before its development got cut off and after the devs got a lot of things right, and as someone who never stopped playing since launch and staunchly defended it throughout its life cycle, only to be betrayed by EA two years ago. I think Bfv is really fun, the gunplay is good, the vehicles are good as well even if there could’ve been a few more, and like he said it really does emphasize squad play. Hell, the whole fortifications system is a really good concept for battlefield games, because if you actually utilize it you’ll have an advantage and they aren’t completely useless either, this game had so so much potential for other theaters of ww2, it’s just that because of how much it was hated, EA and DICE dropped it and gave us 2042 after supposedly working on it for two years, it’s much better than that shitshow that’s for sure. And I’m happy that people are returning to BfV, that it literally has more players now than 2042. Yes there was a very stark contrast in terms of historical accuracy and dedication when compared to Bf1, and all of it is very iffy but there was a very good direction once DICE got their shit together, I think it was only dummed down by the terrible TTK and gameplay changes in the middle of its life cycle, but once they got it right, Bfv had a lot of potential.
Exactly how i feel i love it but im remind of the bugs, mismanagement and greed that happend throughout development
BFV wasn't perfect but i had a blast. Had the best ballistics and weapon feel to date. Loved the maps and the lack of 3d spotting.