Thank you for the review. It really is niche and rare line of AMD's CPU (Pro 5000 series is almost non-existent), so it's nice to see some tests for them. Also, they really shouldn't be limited to just A620, really, whatever suits you in terms of feature set is fine chipset to choose.
not bad video. keep them coming. i would suggest you rethink your benchmark presentation. i'm no expert, but it feels loose, slightly confusng to follow, (you need a second to readjust, and as you do, there's the next result, which is different again.... no idea what's a better way but this needs improving. other than that, very good presentation. i would have maybe referenced the prices, and say that - for example, at 15% cheaper than the regular ones, they are worth considering for DIY market. I doubt professionals will be buying this second hand...
Good video. Ryzen 7 Pro are not only for A620 chipsets. Those Ryzen PRO are supported on about 6 chipsets including the latest X670E and X670. The real problem is DDR5 speed for 7645 and 7745 also 7945 is only at 5200 but, is worth the risk adding 2x 16 GB ram modules 6000 next to 7745 for example??
From our test internally, we weren't able to get our PRO series of processor to have XMP enabled. It could be due to our motherboard, but that motherboard managed to run XMP (6000Mhz) on a non-PRO series 7700. So from our side, we won't really recommend the risk, but perhaps you could have better luck than us!
The most interesting the about the PRO variants is ECC support IMO. This matters for people doing serious workstation work or home servers for critical work.
So I put my hands on a 7945 Pro. Was not easy but my luck and my perseverance got me one in the end. Locked my DDR 5200 to 4800 increasing the latency to 80 ns. The pwr efficiency in low workloads and idle is bad, drawing for example 72.5W for 16% usage, 30W for 5 % and 46 Watts for 10 % workload. Maybe HW info or MSI and RIva doesn't report correctly, but temps are suggesting that it is, that shown PWR draw. However I never cared for OC but undervolting(that is considered still OC by AMD) for cooling purposes and PWR efficiency. Next step, ECC memory. This chip without ECC RAM is kind of blind and unused. I'm gonna look at the potential of AMD guard against ROP, not holding my breath , some ppl saying AMD guard is outdated and just a name... don't know will see. For who is interested Cinebench 24 -Multicore 1427 and single core 115.
Pro Series is not for gamming. (Although you can use if you want to) These PRO CPU's are more expensive and have less performance. The Pro Series is NOT for over clocking. The CPU / APU is for stability and longevity. Basically use this Pro CPU in a simple inexpensive server / work station. I would also probably get the APU variant so that Graphics outlasts a dedicated GPU Card. I build a system with a 5750G Pro with the idea of running it for 20 years. The APU never exceeds 55Degrees so as to ensure longevity. I will probably buy a second B550 mother board as a spare replacement, so that I can get 20 years out of this system.
"These PRO CPU's are more expensive and have less performance." how much CPU power you need when most of the people are GPU bound now days? including myself. "The CPU / APU is for stability and longevity." Stability if paired with ECC. Longevity - I'm trusting AMD as much I trust Intel with gen 13 and 14 recall and refunds :D I upgraded to red instead of blue not based on trust but, power and cooling efficiency . If the longevity will be as much as AM4 is/was is a very welcomed perk.
Thank you for the review. It really is niche and rare line of AMD's CPU (Pro 5000 series is almost non-existent), so it's nice to see some tests for them.
Also, they really shouldn't be limited to just A620, really, whatever suits you in terms of feature set is fine chipset to choose.
How will it work in the new B850-i chipset?
not bad video. keep them coming. i would suggest you rethink your benchmark presentation. i'm no expert, but it feels loose, slightly confusng to follow, (you need a second to readjust, and as you do, there's the next result, which is different again.... no idea what's a better way but this needs improving. other than that, very good presentation. i would have maybe referenced the prices, and say that - for example, at 15% cheaper than the regular ones, they are worth considering for DIY market. I doubt professionals will be buying this second hand...
Nice review . Well done !
thank you!
Good video. Ryzen 7 Pro are not only for A620 chipsets. Those Ryzen PRO are supported on about 6 chipsets including the latest X670E and X670. The real problem is DDR5 speed for 7645 and 7745 also 7945 is only at 5200 but, is worth the risk adding 2x 16 GB ram modules 6000 next to 7745 for example??
From our test internally, we weren't able to get our PRO series of processor to have XMP enabled. It could be due to our motherboard, but that motherboard managed to run XMP (6000Mhz) on a non-PRO series 7700.
So from our side, we won't really recommend the risk, but perhaps you could have better luck than us!
Got myself 7945 pro chip. B620 board . 32 gb ram and 4070. Loving it 😍
Worst chipset for AM5 >>A620, congrats on the CPU - what's the store you got it from?@@allistairsampson6217
The most interesting the about the PRO variants is ECC support IMO. This matters for people doing serious workstation work or home servers for critical work.
Thank you looking to get into the IT career field and this makes the choice easy
So I put my hands on a 7945 Pro. Was not easy but my luck and my perseverance got me one in the end. Locked my DDR 5200 to 4800 increasing the latency to 80 ns. The pwr efficiency in low workloads and idle is bad, drawing for example 72.5W for 16% usage, 30W for 5 % and 46 Watts for 10 % workload. Maybe HW info or MSI and RIva doesn't report correctly, but temps are suggesting that it is, that shown PWR draw.
However I never cared for OC but undervolting(that is considered still OC by AMD) for cooling purposes and PWR efficiency.
Next step, ECC memory. This chip without ECC RAM is kind of blind and unused.
I'm gonna look at the potential of AMD guard against ROP, not holding my breath , some ppl saying AMD guard is outdated and just a name... don't know will see.
For who is interested Cinebench 24 -Multicore 1427 and single core 115.
In my country pro series of Ryzen 7 7745 is at the same price as Ryzen 5 7600x.
Get one.
But can it run Crysis?
somewhat slowly
Pro Series is not for gamming. (Although you can use if you want to)
These PRO CPU's are more expensive and have less performance.
The Pro Series is NOT for over clocking.
The CPU / APU is for stability and longevity.
Basically use this Pro CPU in a simple inexpensive server / work station.
I would also probably get the APU variant so that Graphics outlasts a dedicated GPU Card.
I build a system with a 5750G Pro with the idea of running it for 20 years.
The APU never exceeds 55Degrees so as to ensure longevity.
I will probably buy a second B550 mother board as a spare replacement, so that I can get 20 years out of this system.
"These PRO CPU's are more expensive and have less performance." how much CPU power you need when most of the people are GPU bound now days? including myself.
"The CPU / APU is for stability and longevity." Stability if paired with ECC. Longevity - I'm trusting AMD as much I trust Intel with gen 13 and 14 recall and refunds :D I upgraded to red instead of blue not based on trust but, power and cooling efficiency . If the longevity will be as much as AM4 is/was is a very welcomed perk.
i have ryzen 7 5750g ez